Blog

  • New Biomarkers, Drug Targets Identified for Colorectal Cancer

    New Biomarkers, Drug Targets Identified for Colorectal Cancer

    Using bioinformatics, researchers identified region-specific biomarkers—FGFR4, FLT1, and WNT5A—that drive distinct tumor behaviors and may serve as diagnostic and therapeutic targets.1 Additionally, the researchers identified 2 promising drugs, dovitinib and nintedanib, which could enhance precision treatment strategies for patients with colorectal cancer (CRC).

    The findings from this analysis are published in BMC Cell Communication and Signaling.

    “By integrating bulk-RNA-[sequencing] data with secretome data, we developed an approach that enabled us to infer the process of cellular interaction in CRC through the construction of an interactome,” wrote the researchers of the study. “This analysis revealed the presence of distinct molecular markers depending on the tumor’s site of origin.”

    Comprehensive genomic profiling (CGP) is increasingly shaping precision medicine in CRC by revealing how specific genetic alterations influence prognosis and treatment decisions.2 Using next-generation sequencing, CGP can analyze hundreds of cancer-related genes and key biomarkers in a single test, helping guide therapy selection, identify actionable mutations, and support enrollment in clinical trials. Although a recent study showed that CGP-guided therapies have not yet yielded significant survival advantage, mutations in TP53 and SMAD4 were linked to poorer outcomes, and PTEN alterations were associated with improved survival. These insights highlight the growing role of CGP in informing personalized CRC care and identifying potential targets for future drug development.

    In this study, researchers analyzed gene expression data from the TCGA-COAD database, focusing on tumor location and purity to uncover molecular differences in CRC.1 Using RNA-seq data, they identified region-specific ligands and receptors based on a reference secretome list, revealing key signaling pathways within the tumor microenvironment. The researchers then built an interactome to visualize these cell-to-cell interactions and pinpoint the most influential genes. Finally, survival analysis and drug susceptibility assessments were performed to evaluate the prognostic potential of these genes and identify candidate drugs for targeted CRC therapy.

    Distinct molecular signatures were revealed between right- and left-sided CRCs, highlighting how tumor location influences biological behavior. Through integration of secretome data and interactome analysis, FGFR4, FLT1, and WNT5A emerged as key biomarkers linked to carcinogenesis, fibroblast recruitment, and cell division. These genes demonstrated strong diagnostic and prognostic potential, underscoring their role in tumor progression and treatment response. Importantly, drug analysis identified dovitinib and nintedanib as promising targeted therapies, as both agents interact with multiple biomarkers, offering new opportunities for personalized CRC treatment.

    Overall, the researchers believe the study advances understanding of CRC by uncovering region-specific biomarkers that influence tumor behavior and therapeutic response. The identification of FGFR4, FLT1, and WNT5A as key molecular drivers provides a foundation for developing more precise diagnostic tools and personalized treatments. Moreover, the prediction of dovitinib and nintedanib as potential targeted therapies highlights opportunities to enhance treatment efficacy and overcome drug resistance. Together, these findings offer valuable insights into the tumor microenvironment and lay the groundwork for future experimental validation and clinical translation in CRC care.

    “Nonetheless, the conclusions are constrained by the absence of experimental validation,” acknowledged the researchers. “Future investigations should incorporate comprehensive in vitro and in vivo studies to substantiate the diagnostic and therapeutic efficacy of these candidate genes and drugs. Such validation is essential to elucidate their mechanistic roles and to advance their clinical application in CRC management.”

    References

    1. Caxali GH, Aal MCE, Osvaldo CWG, et al. Integrating the secretome and interactome to identify novel biomarkers and therapeutic targets in colorectal cancer. Cell Commun Signal. 2025;23(1):428. doi:10.1186/s12964-025-02424-4

    2. Steinzor P. Genomic profiling in colorectal cancer reveals prognostic markers. AJMC®. September 11, 2025. Accessed October 17, 2025. https://www.ajmc.com/view/genomic-profiling-in-colorectal-cancer-reveals-prognostic-markers

    Continue Reading

  • WFIU 75th Anniversary Special: Meryl Streep On Profiles

    WFIU 75th Anniversary Special: Meryl Streep On Profiles

    As part of WFIU’s 75th anniversary celebration, we’re mining the archives to offer you samples of our best programming from across the years. This week, it’s a vintage episode of our long-running…

    Continue Reading

  • Osimertinib Plus Chemo Demonstrates OS Benefit in EGFR+ NSCLC With Poor Prognostic Factors

    Osimertinib Plus Chemo Demonstrates OS Benefit in EGFR+ NSCLC With Poor Prognostic Factors

    Treatment with the combination of osimertinib (Tagrisso) and platinum-based chemotherapy and pemetrexed led to an improvement in overall survival (OS) compared with osimertinib monotherapy across subgroups of patients with EGFR-mutated non–small cell lung cancer (NSCLC), including those with poor prognostic factors, according to data from an exploratory analysis of the phase 3 FLAURA2 trial (NCT04035486).1

    Previously reported data from the trial’s final OS analysis showed that patients treated with osimertinib plus chemotherapy (n = 279) achieved a median OS of 47.5 months (95% CI, 41.0-not calculable [NC] vs 37.6 months (95% CI, 33.2-43.2) for those treated with osimertinib alone (n = 278; HR, 0.77; 95% CI, 0.61-0.96; P = .02).1,2

    The exploratory analysis, which was presented at the 2025 ESMO Congress, examined outcomes for patients based on the following 6 prognostic factors:1

    • Central nervous system (CNS) metastases (yes vs no)
    • Bone metastases (yes vs no)
    • Liver metastases (yes vs no)
    • EGFR mutation status (exon 21 L858R mutation vs exon 19 deletion)
    • TP53 status (altered vs wild-type)
    • Plasma EGFR mutations in circulating tumor DNA (ctDNA; detected vs undetected)

    • In the trial’s final OS analysis, osimertinib plus chemotherapy yielded a median OS of 47.5 months vs 37.6 month for osimertinib alone.
    • An exploratory analysis presented at the 2025 ESMO Congress showed the OS benefit was consistent with osimertinib plus chemotherapy across subgroups, including those with poor prognostic factors.
    • Data from FLAURA2 supported the 2024 FDA approval of osimertinib plus chemotherapy for EGFR-mutated advanced NSCLC.

    “Hazard ratios for OS favored the combination arm, regardless of baseline prognostic factors, and were consistent with the overall population,” lead study author Pasi A. Jänne, MD, PhD, said in a presentation of the data. Jänne is a senior physician, senior vice president for Translational Medicine, director of the Belfer Center for Applied Cancer Science, director of the Chen-Huang Center for EGFR Mutant Lung Cancers, and the David M. Livingston, MD, Chair at Dana-Farber Cancer Institute, as well as a professor of medicine at Harvard Medical School in Boston, Massachusetts.

    What Were the FLAURA2 OS Outcomes by Prognostic Subgroup?

    In patients harboring CNS metastases at baseline, the median OS was 40.9 months (95% CI, 35.2-46.6) for osimertinib plus chemotherapy (n = 116) compared with 29.7 months (95% CI, 25.6-35.8) for osimertinib monotherapy (n = 110; HR, 0.72; 95% CI, 0.52-0.99). The 3-year OS rates in this subgroup were 57% (95% CI, 48%-66%) and 40% (95% CI, 31%-49%), respectively. In patients without CNS metastases at baseline, the median OS was not reached (NR; 95% CI, 45.0-NC) for osimertinib plus chemotherapy (n = 163) vs 43.9 months (95% CI, 37.8-53.3) for osimertinib alone (n = 168; HR, 0.77; 95% CI, 0.57-1.05).

    Patients harboring EGFR exon 21 L858R mutations treated with osimertinib plus chemotherapy (n = 106) achieved a median OS of 38.1 months (95% CI, 33.4-42.0) vs 32.4 months (95% CI, 28.0-37.6) for osimertinib alone (n = 107; HR, 0.76; 95% CI, 0.55-1.07). The respective 3-year OS rates were 54% (95% CI, 44%-63%) and 42% (95% CI, 32%-51%). In patients harboring EGFR exon 19 deletions, the median OS was NR (95% CI, 47.2-NC) for osimertinib plus chemotherapy (n = 172) vs 43.0 months (95% CI, 35.7-51.9) for osimertinib alone (n = 169; HR, 0.76; 95% CI, 0.56-1.02).

    Among patients with EGFR mutations detected in plasma ctDNA, the median OS was 38.4 months (95% CI, 33.2-46.6) for osimertinib plus chemotherapy (n = 148) vs 32.5 months (95% CI, 28.8-35.8) for osimertinib monotherapy (n = 161; HR, 0.79; 95% CI, 0.60-1.03). The 3-year OS rates in this subgroup were 53% (95% CI, 45%-61%) for osimertinib plus chemotherapy vs 42% (95% CI, 35%-50%) for osimertinib alone. In patients without EGFR mutations detected in plasma ctDNA, the median OS was NR (95% CI, 50.8-NC) and NR (95% CI, 46.0-NC) for the combination (n = 65) and osimertinib monotherapy (n = 48), respectively (HR, 0.79; 95% CI, 0.44-1.44).

    In the subgroup of patients with liver metastases at baseline, osimertinib plus chemotherapy (n = 43) generated a median OS of 36.6 months (95% CI, 24.4-NC) compared with 28.0 months (95% CI, 21.3-32.5) for osimertinib alone (n = 66; HR, 0.66; 95% CI, 0.41-1.05). The 3-year OS rates were 54% (95% CI, 38%-68%) and 35% (95% CI, 24%-47%), respectively. In patients without liver metastases at baseline, the median OS was 49.6 months (95% CI, 43.0-NC) for osimertinib plus chemotherapy (n = 236) vs 41.8 months (95% CI, 35.7-49.8) for osimertinib alone (n = 212; HR, 0.83; 95% CI, 0.64-1.07).

    For patients with bone metastases, the median OS was 40.2 months (95% CI, 33.9-47.2) for osimertinib plus chemotherapy (n = 132) vs 32.3 months (95% CI, 26.7-36.5) for osimertinib monotherapy (n = 142; HR, 0.76; 95% CI, 0.56-1.02). The 3-year OS rates were 55% (95% CI, 46%-63%) and 42% (95% CI, 34%-50%), respectively. In patients without bone metastases, the median OS was NR (95% CI, 46.6-NC) and 44.5 months (95% CI, 38.3-NC) for osimertinib plus chemotherapy (n = 147) and osimertinib alone (n = 136), respectively (HR, 0.79; 95% CI, 0.57-1.10).

    Finally, in patients harboring TP53 alterations, those given osimertinib plus chemotherapy (n = 46) experienced a median OS of 51.1 months (95% CI, 35.0-NC) vs 43.1 months (95% CI, 34.0-50.1) for those administered osimertinib alone (n = 40; HR, 0.71; 95% CI, 0.40-1.27). The 3-year OS rates were 65% (95% CI, 49%-77%) and 58% (95% CI, 41%-71%), respectively. In patients with TP53 wild-type disease, the median OS was NR (95% CI, 46.6-NC) for osimertinib plus chemotherapy (n = 33) and NR (95% CI, 41.3-NC) for osimertinib alone (n = 34; HR, 0.70; 0.32-1.54).

    How Was the FLAURA2 Trial Designed?

    Notably, prior data from this study supported the February 2024 FDA approval of osimertinib plus platinum-based chemotherapy for use in patients with locally advanced or metastatic NSCLC harboring EGFR exon 19 deletions or exon 21 L858R mutations, as detected by an FDA-approved test.3

    FLAURA2 enrolled patients at least 18 years of age with previously untreated, pathologically confirmed locally advanced or metastatic nonsquamous NSCLC harboring EGFR exon 19 deletions or exon 21 L858R mutations.1 Patients were also required to have a World Health Organization performance status of 0 or 1. Patients with stable CNS metastases were allowed to enroll, and brain scans were mandatory at baseline.

    Patients were randomly assigned 1:1 to receive osimertinib at 80 mg per day in combination with pemetrexed at 500 mg/m2 and carboplatin at area under the curve 5 or cisplatin at 75 mg/m2 once every 3 weeks for 4 cycles, followed by osimertinib at 80 mg once per day plus pemetrexed at 500 mg/m2 once every 3 weeks as maintenance therapy; or osimertinib alone at 80 mg per day. Treatment beyond disease progression was permitted at investigator discretion.

    Investigator-assessed progression-free survival per RECIST 1.1 criteria served as the trial’s primary end point. OS was a key secondary end point.

    Disclosures: Jänne reported serving on an advisory board or committee for AstraZeneca, Mirati Therapeutics, Boehringer Ingelheim, Plizer, Roche/Genentech, Chugai, El Lilly, Ignyta, Takeda, Novartis, Voronoi, SFJ Pharmaceuticals, Biocartis, LOXO Oncology, PUMA, Sanofi, Transcenta, Daichi Sankyo, Bayer, Silicon Therapeutics, AbbVie, Monte Rosa, Merus, Allorion Therapeutics, Accutar Biotech, Scorpion Therapeutics, Merus, Frontier Medicines, Hongyun Biotechnology, Duality Biologics, Blueprint Medicines, Dizal Pharmaceuticals, GSK, Tolremo, Myris Therapeutics, and Bristol Myers Squibb; and receiving grants or contracts from AstraZeneca, Boehringer Ingelheim, Eli Lilly, Takeda, PUMA, Astellas Pharmaceuticals, and Daiichi Sankyo. He also is the co-inventor of the Dana-Farber Cancer Institute (DFCI)–owned patent on EGFR mutations licensed to Lab Corp, and he reported royalties on DFCI-owned intellectual property on EGFR mutations licensed to Lab Corp.

    References

    1. Jänne PA, Planchard D, Kobayashi K, et al. FLAURA2: exploratory overall survival analyses in patients with poorer prognostic factors treated with osimertinib ± platinum-pemetrexed as first-line treatment for EGFR-mutated advanced NSCLC. Presented at: 2025 ESMO Congress; October 17-21, 2025; Berlin, Germany. Abstract LBA77.
    2. Tagrisso plus chemotherapy demonstrated a median overall survival of nearly four years, the longest benefit ever reported in a global Phase III trial in EGFR-mutated advanced lung cancer. News release. AstraZeneca. September 7, 2025. Accessed October 17, 2025. https://www.astrazeneca.com/media-centre/press-releases/2025/tagrisso-plus-chemotherapy-demonstrated-a-median-overall-survival-of-nearly-four-years.html
    3. FDA approves osimertinib with chemotherapy with chemotherapy for EGFR-mutated non-small cell lung cancer. FDA. February 16, 2024. Accessed October 17, 2025. https://www.fda.gov/drugs/resources-information-approved-drugs/fda-approves-osimertinib-chemotherapy-egfr-mutated-non-small-cell-lung-cancer

    Continue Reading

  • Walton Goggins Joins Amber Midthunder James Cameron-Produced Painter

    Walton Goggins Joins Amber Midthunder James Cameron-Produced Painter

    Walton Goggins has signed on to star opposite Amber Midthunder in Painter, an action movie project from John Wick creator Derek Kolstad that was just acquired by 20th Century Studios.

    As part of the acquisition, James Cameron, whose…

    Continue Reading

  • Prem: Newcastle 19-36 Northampton – Saints go top, Red Bulls remain winless

    Prem: Newcastle 19-36 Northampton – Saints go top, Red Bulls remain winless

    Newcastle Red Bulls: Chamberlain; Spencer, Hearle, Clarke, Williams; Connon, Benitez Cruz; Brocklebank, McGuigan, Palframan, Hodgson, Clarke, Lee-Warner, Gordon, Mafi.

    Replacements: Fletcher, McCallum, De Bruin, Usher, Lockwood, Elliott,…

    Continue Reading

  • Here’s what banks are looking at to spot economic trouble as credit quality sparks concerns

    Here’s what banks are looking at to spot economic trouble as credit quality sparks concerns

    By Steve Gelsi and Greg Robb

    While the economy seems to be chugging along, the list of possible threats appears to be getting longer as banks clock signs of tariff stress

    Fifth Third Bank Chief Executive Tim Spence says his business clients are optimistic about the economy despite uncertainty over tariffs and other unknowns.

    Bankers tend to use a variety of data points to gauge the state of the economy, depending on the institution and the individual doing the forecasting. And after this week’s stock-market drop for bank stocks, they’ve scoured every one of them.

    Despite the customary optimism from banks as a way to encourage economic activity, this week’s earnings updates revealed that lenders continue to watch for key data points around tariffs impacting client costs, as well as some weakness in certain sectors – such as sluggish home construction and softness in the auto-financing business.

    Banks are also increasing their scrutiny of their business-lending activities, after bank stocks sold off this week due to the fallout from high-profile bankruptcies at auto-parts seller First Brands and subprime auto lender Tricolor. But so far, they haven’t reported any alarming rises in delinquent loans, another key metric.

    JPMorgan Chase & Co. (JPM) Chief Executive Jamie Dimon raised the possibility of more “cockroaches” in the form of credit problems, which has banks studying their balance sheets.

    Fifth Third Bancorp (FITB) Chief Executive Tim Spence summed up the current environment as “nauseous optimism” – a variation on the more common term, “cautious optimism.”

    The nauseousness comes from tariff uncertainty that “absolutely continues to weigh” on some clients, he said. It’s a factor in more persistent inflation, which in turn impacts consumer spending and borrowing.

    On the other hand, expected interest-rate cuts by the Federal Reserve are providing hope among businesses of improved demand and investment.

    Clients that have put off capital improvements are now seeking loans, Spence noted.

    “We are getting requests now for financing that are reflected in the pipeline in the middle-market business, in particular, to support that sort of shift from rent to own,” Spence said. “So I think that’s quite positive.”

    The bank’s customers in the logistics business function as a “good bellwether” on the economy and have also been somewhat upbeat, he added.

    “We’re hearing from logistics clients that there hasn’t exactly been a huge rebound, but that the activity has stabilized and is moving on the upswing,” Spence said, with help from businesses lifted by government infrastructure investments and AI-infrastructure efforts.

    On the down side, however, has been residential construction and autos, according to Spence.

    Credit problems appear to be idiosyncratic for now

    Dimon’s comments about the possibility for more trouble in bank loans came up again Friday on an earnings call for Huntington Bancshares Inc. (HBAN), as the bank reported stronger-than-expected third-quarter earnings.

    “I’m obviously aware of Jamie’s comments this week, but I don’t see it broadly affecting the industry, and many of those who reported are suggesting the consumer is in relatively good shape,” said Huntington CEO Stephen Steinour. “We certainly are not seeing forward indicators in terms of delinquency or other measures.”

    Bankers this week told MarketWatch that the U.S. economy is so complex, there’s no single indicator that would sum up the outlook for the consumer. Since economic downturns tend to crop up for a variety of reasons, it’s challenging at best to anticipate the most important data point among thousands.

    “As we look at the data, we’re not seeing any imminent signs of a recession,” Zach Wasserman, Huntington’s chief financial officer, told MarketWatch. He said the bank uses a battery of both internal and external data to weigh economic strength on the horizon.

    Unemployment remains a key macro factor, because if people can’t pay back their loans, banks’ credit will suffer. If more people lose their jobs, it’s widely expected to have a negative impact on bank credit.

    To gauge the health of the consumer, banks also look at credit-card spending, as well as interest-rate changes in the U.S. Treasury market and corporate bond markets.

    Bank balance sheets tend to benefit when the Treasury yield curve holds on to its historic shape of a steep yield curve. But signs that short-term rates may be dropping sharply could also signal a flattening of the yield curve, which is less favorable for banks.

    Loan growth is another key metric, with Huntington Bank now forecasting 2025 loan growth of about 8%, up from its earlier estimate of 6% to 8%.

    But questions continue to swirl around problems with collateral that caused Fifth Third to lose money on loans to Tricolor, while other lenders took losses on loans to First Brands.

    Asked about banks’ credit strength this week, St. Louis Fed President Alberto Musalem said his understanding is that the credit concerns at regional banks appeared related to individual circumstances, and were not systemic or tied to general macroeconomic conditions.

    Also read: Zions takes $50 million loan loss as another credit ‘cockroach’ appears. Regional-bank stocks are falling.

    -Steve Gelsi -Greg Robb

    This content was created by MarketWatch, which is operated by Dow Jones & Co. MarketWatch is published independently from Dow Jones Newswires and The Wall Street Journal.

    (END) Dow Jones Newswires

    10-17-25 1646ET

    Copyright (c) 2025 Dow Jones & Company, Inc.

    Continue Reading

  • Ferrari Just Built a New F40 Tribute as a One-Off – Road & Track

    1. Ferrari Just Built a New F40 Tribute as a One-Off  Road & Track
    2. Ferrari SC40: A 1-of-1 Modern Homage to the F40  duPont REGISTRY News
    3. This One-Off Ferrari F40 Tribute Is Missing Two Things From The Original  CarBuzz
    4. One-off Ferrari SC40 is inspired…

    Continue Reading

  • What the FRLD means

    What the FRLD means



    People wade across a flooded street after heavy monsoon rainfall in Karachi on July 25,…

    Continue Reading

  • Animal Print Takes the Spotlight at Conner Ives and Jimmy Choo’s Tribeca Dinner

    Animal Print Takes the Spotlight at Conner Ives and Jimmy Choo’s Tribeca Dinner

    The limited-edition Conner Ives x Jimmy Choo capsule may have debuted at Ives’s Autumn/Winter 2025 show during London Fashion Week, but the celebrations carried on stateside. On Thursday night, the designer gathered friends and muses for an…

    Continue Reading

  • Introductory Remarks at the IMF’s Western Hemisphere Department Press Briefing By Rodrigo Valdés Director of the Western Hemisphere Department 2025 Annual Meetings

    Introductory Remarks at the IMF’s Western Hemisphere Department Press Briefing By Rodrigo Valdés Director of the Western Hemisphere Department 2025 Annual Meetings


    Introductory Remarks at the IMF’s Western Hemisphere Department Press Briefing




    By Rodrigo Valdés, Director of the Western Hemisphere Department
    2025 Annual Meetings




    October 17, 2025















    Over the past months, Latin America and the Caribbean have been navigating through shifting winds of a changing and uncertain global environment. Our Regional Economic Outlook discusses how the region has fared and the challenges ahead. Let me share a few highlights from our report.

    Growth in Latin America and the Caribbean has experienced no major disruptions in the first half of 2025. It is projected to remain steady at 2.4 percent in 2025 and moderate slightly next year, with risks tilted to the downside.

    Despite uncertainty, global conditions have been broadly supportive:

    1. Commodity prices have stabilized after a brief period of volatility;
    2. Financial conditions have eased amid declining sovereign spreads and a weaker US dollar; and
    3. Regional exports have kept pace with global trends.

    Labor markets remained robust, generally supporting private consumption in most economies. Low trade exposure of many economies to the United States and lower tariffs compared with other emerging economies have also provided buffers.

    Against this background, macroeconomic policy calibration remains a challenge in several countries. While most countries are expected to strengthen their fiscal positions, structural primary balances are projected to be lower than anticipated, indicating unwelcome delays in fiscal consolidation.

    In fact, with public debt ratios rising, fiscal consolidation is increasingly important to mitigate risks of decompression in risk premiums. Insufficient fiscal effort complicates not only debt sustainability but also the effectiveness of monetary policy—I will come back to this later.

    On the monetary policy front, inflation remains above target in some countries, amid relatively balanced risks. While robust labor markets and fiscal concerns slow disinflation, recent exchange rate appreciation is helping in some cases.

    Central banks have responded appropriately, remaining data driven, and inflation expectations are stable but also remain above targets. Continued caution is warranted, especially in cases where economic slack is not evident and inflation remains above targets.

    Looking ahead, the region’s potential growth remains stuck in its low historical average and lagging its peers. This reflects slowing labor force expansion, low capital accumulation, and stagnant productivity.

    This year’s report has undertaken two analytical studies to better understand some policy challenges.

    One focuses on interactions between monetary and fiscal policies. Reforms to enhance central bank independence have helped achieve price stability. However, high public debt and deficits can constrain monetary policy. To safeguard price stability, countries must focus on advancing fiscal consolidation and improving fiscal frameworks. Lower debt levels make monetary policy more effective, aiding convergence to inflation targets.

    The second investigates some drivers of low total factor productivity in the region. Exploring firm-level data, we show that this is partly explained by persistent resource misallocation and sluggish productivity growth among firms. More productive firms face barriers to expand, which calls for reforms to address frictions—including size-based regulations, financial constraints, and limited competition.


    The Fund remains closely engaged with the region through policy advice, capacity development, and financial support.

    In terms of program engagement, since April, Barbados completed its arrangement under the Extended Fund Facility and the Resilience and Sustainability Facility, and a new Flexible Credit Line (FCL) has been launched with Costa Rica, while Colombia canceled its FCL.


    To sum up, the global landscape is shifting, but this is no reason for inaction. As the saying goes, countries may not control the winds, but they can adjust their sails. Reinforcing policy frameworks, rebuilding fiscal buffers, and fostering growth opportunities are the sails to adjust.


    Before returning to Julie, let me also remind you that I will be leaving the Western Hemisphere Department by the end of this month, moving to the Fiscal Affairs Department. WHD new director will be Nigel Chalk – sitting here – who already supervises several countries and activities and guarantees a seamless transition.


    IMF Communications Department
    MEDIA RELATIONS

    PRESS OFFICER: Julie Ziegler

    Phone: +1 202 623-7100Email: MEDIA@IMF.org





    Continue Reading