Good morning, Aston Martin Aramco fans. This is your Captain speaking. Welcome to your special training detachment. You all know Formula One, but just how much do really know about the science of what a driver is subjected to in the cockpit?
This…
Good morning, Aston Martin Aramco fans. This is your Captain speaking. Welcome to your special training detachment. You all know Formula One, but just how much do really know about the science of what a driver is subjected to in the cockpit?
This…
Infinatamab deruxtecan (I-DXd) demonstrated intracranial efficacy with acceptable safety in patients with extensive-stage small cell lung cancer (ES-SCLC) and baseline brain metastases, according to data from the primary analysis of the phase 2 IDeate-Lung01 trial (NCT05280470) presented during the
In those with baseline brain metastases (n = 65), the intracranial confirmed objective response rate (cORR) was 46.2% (95% CI, 33.7%-59.0%). Specifically, 30.8% of patients achieved a complete response (CR) as their best overall response, 15.4% experienced a partial response (PR), and 44.6% had stable disease (SD); 1.5% of patients experienced progressive disease (PD), and 7.7% were not evaluable (NE). The confirmed disease control rate (cDCR) was 90.8% (95% CI, 81.0%-96.5%). The median duration of response (DOR) was 6.2 months (95% CI, 4.0-7.9), and the median time to response (TTR) was 1.4 months (range, 0.9-8.5).
Moreover, in patients who had not previously received brain radiotherapy for baseline brain metastases (n = 26), I-DXd elicited an intracranial cORR of 57.7% (95% CI, 36.9%-76.6%). In those with baseline brain target lesions (n = 29), the intracranial cORR with the agent was 65.5% (95% CI, 45.7%-82.1%), and the central nervous system (CNS) cDCR was 96.6% (95% CI, 82.2%-99.9%).
“Intracranial efficacy with I-DXd [at] 12 mg/kg was promising, with 30.8% of patients achieving an intracranial CR, contributing to an intracranial cORR of 46.2% and DCR of 90.8%,” Pedro Simoes da Rocha, MD, PhD, said in a presentation of the data. Rocha is a medical oncologist at Vall d’Hebron University Hospital in Barcelona, Spain, and an International Association for the Study of Lung Cancer (IASLC) SCLC committee member.
The multicenter, randomized, open-label, phase 2 study included patients with histologically or cytologically documented ES-SCLC who were at least 18 years of age, had an ECOG performance status no higher than 1, and had previously received at least 1 but no more than 3 lines of platinum-based chemotherapy.2 Patients must have experienced radiologically documented disease progression on or after their most recent previous systemic treatment; they also needed to have at least 1 measurable lesion by RECIST 1.1 criteria. Those with asymptomatic brain metastases were allowed.
For part 1 of the study, the dose-optimization portion of the research, patients were randomly assigned 1:1 to receive I-DXd at 8 mg/kg every 3 weeks (n = 46; arm 1) or at 12 mg/kg every 3 weeks. For part 2, the extension portion, the agent was further examined at the 12-mg/kg dose.
The primary end point was ORR by blinded independent central review (BICR), and secondary end points included DOR, progression-free survival (PFS), DCR, and TTR by BICR and investigator assessment. Other end points comprised overall survival (OS), investigator-assessed ORR, safety, pharmacokinetics, and immunogenicity.
A subgroup analysis of patients with asymptomatic brain metastases identified by CNS BICR at study baseline was conducted and shared during the 2025 ESMO Congress.1 Brain CT or MRI was done at baseline for all patients. Those determined to have brain metastases had brain CT/MRI every 6 weeks for 36 weeks and every 12 weeks thereafter.
Of the 137 total patients who received I-DXd at a dose of 12 mg/kg, 65 had baseline brain metastases, and 72 did not. Of those who did, 39 received prior brain radiotherapy, and 26 did not. A total of 29 patients had brain target lesions at baseline with a median size of 17 mm (range, 10-68); 15 of these patients had prior brain radiotherapy and 14 did not.
The median patient age was 61.0 years (range, 39.0-76.0). Moreover, 80.0% of patients had an ECOG performance status of 1, and 20.0% had a status of 0. The median number of prior lines of systemic therapy received was 2 (range, 1-3).
In those with baseline brain metastases, the agent led to a systemic cORR of 46.2% (95% CI, 33.7%-59.0%). Best overall responses included CR (1.5%), PR (44.6%), and SD (43.1%); 7.7% of patients had PD, and 3.1% were NE. The systemic cDCR was 89.2% (95% CI, 79.1%-95.6%), the median DOR was 4.3 months (95% CI, 3.0-5.8), the median TTR was 1.4 months (range, 1.0-8.1), the median PFS was 4.5 months (95% CI, 4.0-5.4) and the median OS was 10.4 months (range, 7.9-15.3).
In those without baseline brain metastases (n = 72), the cORR with the agent was 50.0% (95% CI, 38.0%-62.0%) with best overall responses of CR in 2.8% of patients, PR in 47.2% of patients, and SD in 36.1% of patients; 6.9% of patients had PD, and 6.9% were NE. The cDCR in this group was 86.1% (95% CI, 75.9%-93.1%), the median DOR was 5.9 months (95% CI, 4.0-8.3), the median TTR was 1.4 months (range, 1.2-4.0), the median PFS was 5.4 months (95% CI, 4.2-6.7), and the median OS was 10.1 months (95% CI, 8.4-13.3).
Concordance between systemic and CNS objective response was 75.4%, Rocha said, adding that the concordance between systemic and CNS disease control was 86.2%. “OS and PFS were similar for patients with and without baseline brain metastases,” he said.
I-DXd showed intracranial efficacy irrespective of previous treatment for brain metastases at baseline. In those with prior radiotherapy (n = 39), the cORR was 38.5% (95% CI, 23.4%-55.4%); in those who received prior radiotherapy within 6 months prior to the study (n = 28), the cORR was 39.3% (95% CI, 21.5%-59.4%) and in those who received it 6 months or longer before study (n = 11), the cORR was 36.4% (95% CI, 10.9%-69.2%).
“Progression in the brain was uncommon, suggesting that I-DXd may prevent brain metastases,” Rocha added. Among the 65 patients with baseline brain metastases, 35.4% experienced progression in the brain; in those who had not received prior radiotherapy (n = 26), this rate was 23.1%, and in those who had (n =39), this rate was 43.6%. In those without baseline brain metastases (n = 72), 12.5% experienced progression in the brain.
The agent also elicited responses in those with brain target lesions at baseline (n = 29), he added. The CNS cORR in those without prior radiotherapy (n = 14) was 71.4% (95% CI, 41.9%-91.6%); in those with prior radiotherapy (n = 15), the CNS cORR was 60.0% (95% CI, 32.3%-83.7%). Concordance between systemic and CNS objective response was 69.0%, according to Rocha. The CNS DOR was 5.7 months (95% CI, 4.1-7.1) and the CNS TTR was 1.3 months (range, 0.9-3.0).
Any-grade treatment-related adverse effects (TRAEs) were experienced by 87.7% of patients with brain metastases at baseline (n = 65) and 91.7% of those without baseline brain metastases (n = 72); these effects were grade 3 or higher for 30.8% and 41.7% of patients, respectively. They were serious in 10.8% and 25.0% of cases. In those with baseline brain metastases, TRAEs led to dose delay, reduction, or treatment discontinuation for 23.1%, 15.4%, and 7.7% of patients; in those without baseline brain metastases, these rates were 27.8%, 15.3%, and 11.1%. TRAEs proved fatal for 1.5% and 6.9% of patients, respectively.
The most common TRAEs experienced by at least 10% of patients with baseline brain metastases were nausea (any grade, 49.2%; grade ≥3, 1.5%), decreased appetite (32.3%; 1.5%), neutropenia (30.8%; 6.2%), anemia (27.7%; 7.7%), asthenia (23.1%; 1.5%), fatigue (20.0%; 3.1%), lymphopenia (20.0%; 12.3%), diarrhea (16.9%; 0%), leukopenia (15.4%; 0%), thrombocytopenia (13.8%; 6.2%), increased aspartate aminotransferase level (10.8%; 1.5%), constipation (10.8%; 0%), and pneumonitis (10.8%; 0%).
The phase 3 IDeate-Lung02 study (NCT06203210) will be evaluating the intracranial activity of I-DXd vs physician’s choice of treatment in the form of topotecan, amrubicin, or lurbinectedin (Zepzelca) in patients with relapsed SCLC.3
The past week has been a whirlwind of activity in the tech sector, with artificial intelligence (AI) taking center stage. From a $40 billion data center project to a new AI chip, the industry’s biggest players are making significant strides in…
I can’t tell you how many times I’ve needed files converted from one form to another. I might need to convert an image from .png to .jpg so it takes up less storage on my web hosting platform. I might need to convert a video from one…
The FiiO audio brand has made a name for itself by bringing high-quality audio products to market that have a long list of features, but most importantly, sound great — case in point, the new FiiO M21 digital audio player, or DAP. People are…
Urgency addiction makes speed look like progress. With AI amplifying false certainty, leaders must slow down to protect sound judgment and strategy.
getty
When I work with high-performing leadership teams, it’s easy to notice a bias for action….
Suspected scam investment companies are exploiting Trustpilot’s review system by giving themselves five-star ratings to persuade would-be investors that they are legitimate businesses, a report has warned.
An investigation by the verification firm KwikChex found operators using fake reviews, forged certificates and stolen corporate identities to lure victims.
One operator posed as a regulated law firm able help investors recover lost money, despite having no listing with the Solicitors Regulation Authority (SRA).
“These scammers see Trustpilot as a vital part of their playbook,” said Chris Emmins, KwikChex’s co-founder.
According to the report, scammers are deploying networks of fake reviewers, who leave glowing endorsements for multiple linked companies while attacking rivals.
Patterns in posting behaviour and use of language revealed clusters of suspicious reviews, while cross-checks of business information raised red flags such as virtual office addresses and falsified incorporation documents.
In many cases, KwikChex said it had discovered the scam companies using cloned websites and counterfeit certificates.
Trustpilot responded to the report by launching an investigation and removing several reviews that had a significant impact on the companies’ ratings. One review page was also taken down.
Fake reviews have become a business, with companies dedicated to selling positive or negative feedback online.
In response, regulators such as the UK’s Competition and Markets Authority have made it illegal to commission or host fabricated feedback. These measures are aimed at restoring consumer confidence, but critics have questioned whether the marketplace can be policed, because of its sheer scale.
Trustpilot uses artificial intelligence software to spot fake reviews. The company removed 7.4% of reviews submitted in 2024, compared with 6.1% the year before.
The vast majority of removed reviews were taken down automatically by AI as it identified patterns that flagged concerns.
One company that carried a 4.7-star rating was Crypto-Benefits247. After the company was flagged by the Guardian, Trustpilot removed some of its positive ratings and its score fell to 2.8. The Financial Conduct Authority has warned that the firm may be operating illegally. KwikChex found Crypto-Benefits247’s incorporation certificate was a forgery, crudely edited from another company’s legitimate document.
There is a one-star score from someone who said they lost more than £65,000 to Crypto-Benefits247 after being lured in with small, successful withdrawals before the company began inventing fees for certificates, upgrades and “activation keys”.
Another company, Oakvests Crypto, had a 4.5-star score but used a video of the chief executive of a different business, Oakvest, on its website. Oakvest’s finance director, David Wells, said: “We are grateful to KwikChex for alerting us to this identity theft and wish them success in tracking down the fraudsters.”
Since the account was flagged to Trustpilot, Oakvests Crypto’s rating has dropped to 3.2, with a number of reviews taken down.
Quantum Recovery Law Group, rated 4.1 stars from 82 reviews, presented itself as a wealth recovery law firm. The SRA has issued a scam alert against it. Trustpilot removed the account after being presented with the findings of KwikChex’s report.
The exact names of companies are used in this article, as such entities often imitate or reference real businesses.
Emmins said: “The successful use of fake reviews undermines every legitimate business that works to earn a genuine reputation. Meanwhile, scammers use Trustpilot to polish their lies.”
KwikChex has called on Trustpilot to drop its slogan “find a company you can trust” and to stop using “verified” banners on reviews, warning that the platform’s system is too easily exploited. In response to this specifically, Trustpilot said: “As we have not seen the mentioned report we cannot comment on its findings at this time.”
None of the companies identified by KwikChex responded to the Guardian’s attempt to reach them for a comment.
A spokesperson for Trustpilot said it takes the integrity of reviews extremely seriously, adding that its systems were always learning and it did not “always get it right”. They said that was why the community was encouraged to flag suspicious reviews.
“We have previously taken action against the companies mentioned, removing fabricated reviews and issuing both warnings and legal cease and desist letters for guideline breaches,” the spokesperson said.
“Since further concerns have been raised we have launched a deeper investigation and removed further fabricated reviews from each profile. Each profile now displays a consumer alert, warning consumers about these companies. Our investigation is ongoing.”
Trustpilot said it was continuing “strengthening” its systems to stay ahead of “evolving tactics”.
A newly discovered way to monitor magma movements beneath Mount Etna could help scientists forecast when it might erupt.
Mount Etna, located on the Italian island of Sicily, is Europe’s largest active volcano. Humans have documented its activity…
With borrowing costs rising and western governments including the UK cutting their aid budgets, unsustainable debts are driving a development crisis across the global south.
In the latest evidence, Ethiopia last week faced the threat of being sued…