Blog

Unlock the Editor’s Digest for free

Roula Khalaf, Editor of the FT, selects her favourite stories in this weekly newsletter.

Hong Kong investor CK Infrastructure, whose overture for Thames Water was spurned earlier this year, has called on the UK to renationalise the troubled utility, warning that an unsatisfactory bidding process has led to a plan that imperils the company.

Potential bidders for Thames Water, which is struggling under nearly £20bn of debt, were “excluded” from making an offer, according to a complaint by CKI to the sector regulator, Ofwat, earlier this month and seen by the Financial Times.

KKR, the private equity firm that Thames Water selected as its preferred bidder to take it over, walked away in June. That has left Britain’s largest water company in the hands of its creditors, which include the hedge fund Elliott Management and the US private capital firm Apollo Global Management.

CKI accused the creditors — who have said they would publicly list Thames Water and write down its debt by 25 per cent in exchange for leniency on fines and targets — of short-termism, in an explosive intervention to Ofwat.

The Hong Kong-based firm slams the creditors’ plan as a “high-risk proposition that gives rise to unnecessary risk of further failures”.

“Only a single consortium is allowed to take part [in the rescue process], including distressed debt hedge funds who lack tangible operating experience in the water sector and who so far appear to be aiming for an early exit and payout in March 2030, with Thames Water’s future then passed to someone else,” CKI said in the Ofwat letter, signed by Andrew Hunter, deputy managing director of CK Infrastructure’s UK business.

CKI, which owns Northumbrian Water, added that it “would willingly put our plan to the test against that of others”, if the government temporarily renationalises Thames Water.

The Sunday Times reported that CKI had written to Ofwat.

The regulator is currently mulling the creditors’ proposal, which would see them take over the business formally in exchange for £3.15bn equity, a writedown of the debt and a stock market listing as soon as 2030.

Hunter warned that the creditors are not injecting sufficient cash and that the additional debt is being loaned at “high” interest rates, suggesting that an even larger proportion of customers’ cash will go towards servicing the borrowings.

If the creditor plan does not go ahead, Thames Water — which provides water and sewerage services to 16mn households in London and the south east — could become the first water company in England to be temporarily renationalised under the government’s special administration regime.

The intervention by CKI throws down the gauntlet to the government, which has insisted that it favours a “market-led” solution while refusing to comment on the creditors’ proposals.

The special administration regime, or SAR, is designed to ensure that essential utilities keep running if a company fails. A special administrator — a private company — would be brought into stabilise and restructure the business ahead of a sale to new owners or renationalisation.

CKI alleged in the letter that bidding was far from market-led, given that KKR was given exclusivity and that the process has not reopened since the private equity firm walked away.

CKI’s letter goes on to claim that the creditors’ request for leniency on fines and pollution targets creates a “moral hazard” and that CKI would seek no such special treatment.

CKI and Ofwat declined to comment.

The Department for the Environment, Food and Rural Affairs said: “The company remains financially stable, but we have stepped up our preparations and stand ready for all eventualities, including applying for a Special Administration Regime if that were to become necessary.”

The creditors’ consortium said on Sunday that it had “put forward a comprehensive plan which restores the company’s financial resilience and delivers a stretching operational turnaround led by an experienced world-class board.”

It countered that CKI had not put in a “viable” proposal for Thames Water, and that its plan to invest in infrastructure would have “slowed the turnaround and significantly delayed a return to compliance” and “alienated the UK’s debt markets for water companies”.

Thames Water referred queries to the creditor consortium.