Blog

  • Gold prices are so high, even central banks are feeling FOMO

    Gold prices are so high, even central banks are feeling FOMO

    By Myra P. Saefong

    Central banks view gold as a ‘key, liquid component of their reserves’

    Germany’s central bank, the Deutsche Bundesbank, holds the world’s second-largest gold reserves, behind the U.S.

    Gold prices at record highs sounds like a broken record, but central banks have continued to buy more than they’re selling, even with prices for the precious metal at their highest levels ever.

    “Central banks continue to be consistent and strategic buyers of gold, even at record prices, because of the role it plays in strengthening their reserve portfolios,” Joe Cavatoni, senior market strategist at the World Gold Council, said in comments sent to MarketWatch Friday.

    “For many, this is about diversification, stability, and long-term confidence in their holdings,” he said.

    “In an environment of persistent geopolitical uncertainty, shifting interest rate expectations, and questions around the reliability of fiat currencies such as the U.S. dollar, gold remains a trusted store of value that’s independent of any one government or financial system,” Cavatoni said. “We’re seeing a structural, not cyclical, change in how central banks view gold – as a key, liquid component of their reserves.”

    Central banks around the world added 19 metric tons to their global reserves in August, according to data from the World Gold Council dated Oct. 3. That followed a month-to-month fall in July.

    Gold futures have climbed by nearly 60% this year, with prices on Comex notching record-high settlements 48 times so far in 2025, according to Dow Jones Market Data. Gold for December delivery (GC00) (GCZ25) last marked a record finish of $4,304.60 an ounce on Oct. 16.

    The record-high price “likely remains a constraint on the level of buying by central banks,” but the recent moderation in buying “does not necessarily signal that central banks as a whole are losing interest in gold,” the WGC said in its report.

    Central-bank purchases of gold rose in August.

    Strength in central-bank purchases “proves that central banks aren’t immune to FOMO,” which refers to the fear of missing out, Adrian Ash, director of research at BullionVault, told MarketWatch on Friday.

    Strength in central-bank gold purchases ‘proves that central banks aren’t immune to FOMO … [and] confirms that the bid from sovereign states remains keen, even at new record highs’ in gold prices.Adrian Ash, BullionVault

    “Why wait for gold prices to double?” he said. The central-bank purchases also confirm that the “bid from sovereign states remains keen, even at new record highs” in prices for the precious metal.

    Read: Gold is the hot topic at the IMF and World Bank meetings. Could that help put a lid on prices?

    As of October, the U.S. is the country with the largest gold reserves, according to BestBrokers, an investment-research platform, citing data from the WGC and International Monetary Fund.

    The U.S. holds about 8,133.5 metric tons of gold in its reserves.

    The U.S. holds about 8,133 metric tons of gold stored at U.S. Mint locations in Fort Knox, Kan.; West Point, N.Y.; and Denver, as well as a small amount in the vaults at the New York Federal Reserve, according to Edmund Moy, a former director of the U.S. Mint, which is part of the Treasury Department. He noted that the U.S. Mint’s director has custodial responsibility over U.S. gold reserves.

    Moy, who is now senior IRA strategist for precious-metals distributor U.S. Money Reserve, said the U.S. holds the most gold reserves as a direct result of U.S. President Franklin D. Roosevelt requiring Americans to turn in their gold coins to the federal government starting in 1933. It’s also a result of foreign nations paying in gold for American products during World War II, he said.

    At one point many years ago, America’s gold reserves stood at more than 20,000 metric tons and were used to back the U.S. dollar, but in the early 1970s, countries began to suspect that the U.S. had printed more dollars than it could back with gold, which started a run on redeeming dollars for gold, Moy said. President Richard Nixon stopped those redemptions in 1972, and U.S. gold reserves have remained stable at around 8,113 tons, he said.

    In August, the biggest central-bank gold buyer was the National Bank of Kazakhstan, and the National Bank of Bulgaria and Central Reserve Bank of El Salvador also jointed the buyers list, according to the WGC.

    The National Bank of Poland has been the largest purchaser year to date, and it “reaffirmed its commitment to gold by increasing its target share,” the WGC said.

    Poland, Turkey and the Czech Republic have added to their gold reserves for at least 24 months straight, said Moy. China and India have also been consistently building up their gold reserves – “both to strengthen their currencies and to reduce their dependence on the [U.S. dollar],” he said.

    Central banks continue to buy gold, even at record-high prices, primarily because they want to reduce their exposure to the U.S. dollar given their “concerns over the deteriorating U.S. fiscal condition and increasing economic uncertainty and [the] potential impact on their dollar holdings,” Moy said.

    ‘Central banks will continue to be big players in the gold market for the foreseeable future.’Edmund Moy, U.S. Money Reserve

    Some countries, such as Russia, want to have some of their reserves in a “sanction-proof asset,” he said, and others want to reduce their dependence on the U.S. dollar while “exploring alternatives” to displace the dollar as a reserve currency.

    “Increasing gold reserves will improve their positioning” in whatever direction those alternatives take, Moy said. “Central banks will continue to be big players in the gold market for the foreseeable future.”

    -Myra P. Saefong

    This content was created by MarketWatch, which is operated by Dow Jones & Co. MarketWatch is published independently from Dow Jones Newswires and The Wall Street Journal.

    (END) Dow Jones Newswires

    10-18-25 0700ET

    Copyright (c) 2025 Dow Jones & Company, Inc.

    Continue Reading

  • ER Doctors Say These Are The Heart Symptoms Women Should Never Ignore

    ER Doctors Say These Are The Heart Symptoms Women Should Never Ignore

    At one time, heart disease was believed to largely only happen to men, which meant women weren’t included in health studies on the topic.

    While this has changed ― and it’s now known that heart disease is the leading cause of death for women…

    Continue Reading

  • Blackstone says Wall Street is complacent about AI disruption

    Blackstone says Wall Street is complacent about AI disruption

    Stay informed with free updates

    Wall Street investors are underestimating artificial intelligence’s potential to make entire industries obsolete, Blackstone’s president has said, adding that the impact of the technology was now “top of our list” when evaluating deals.

    Jonathan Gray said that understanding AI risks has become a priority for the private capital group when assessing investments, with the technology already upending business models and causing job losses.

    “We’ve told our credit and equity teams: address AI on the first pages of your investment memos,” said Gray at the Financial Times Private Capital Summit in London this week.

    High valuations of lossmaking AI companies, and the circular financial relationships between many key players, have fuelled concerns about a bubble in the sector.

    Gray said investor exuberance meant it was inevitable that there would be some misallocation of capital to AI companies — “think of Pets.com in 2000”. But he added that the scale of the technology’s impact meant investors may still underestimate its potential to crush entire industries.

    FT interview with Blackstone’s Jonathan Gray

    Conducted by Arash Massoudi at Private Capital Summit in London.

    Some content could not load. Check your internet connection or browser settings.

    “People say, ‘This smells like a bubble,’” but they’re not asking: ‘What about legacy businesses that could be massively disrupted?’” said Gray.

    “If you think about rules-based businesses — legal, accounting, transaction and claims processing — this is going to be profound,” he added.

    Gray compared the looming disruption to New York City taxi licences, which grew almost 500-fold in value over many decades, before swiftly losing 80 per cent of their value when ride-hailing apps Uber and Lyft disrupted the market.

    Gray said Blackstone had elevated AI risks to the “top of our list” when assessing the potential downside of investments.

    “We’re spending enormous time on both new deals and, importantly, our existing portfolio: what does AI mean for enterprise software, for service businesses handling data and for rules-based work?” he added.

    The rise of AI algorithms created by OpenAI, Microsoft and Google is already disrupting white-collar sectors such as accounting, consulting and law, and threatening business models of companies such as advertisers, publishers and software groups.

    Machine -learning technology is also threatening manual jobs in areas such as manufacturing. 

    Blackstone, an early and prolific investor in the data centres used by OpenAI and others to power large language models, has been assessing AI risks for years. It has recently decided not to buy some software and call-centre companies seen as vulnerable to AI-related risks, according to people briefed on the matter.

    Blackstone has also invested heavily in utility companies that power data centres, even repositioning some of its industrial portfolio companies such as Copeland and Legence to sell products to providers of AI infrastructure.

    Despite its evaluation of AI-related risks, some of Blackstone’s investments are exposed to the impact of technological change. Its private credit business has lent billions of dollars to enterprise software companies, including Medallia, that risk losing customers to AI-driven competitors.

    Gray said that while AI would create some negative economic disruptions, the technology could also yield underestimated productivity benefits for large corporations and the global economy, creating trillions of dollars in new corporate wealth. So he has challenged dealmakers to also not miss AI-related opportunities.

    “We’re forcing the conversation. We don’t claim to know exactly how it all plays out. But if every deal team has to analyse AI impact then it’s the number-one topic in the room,” he said. 

    “Acting like it’s business as usual would be a mistake,” he added.

    Continue Reading

  • Every product Apple launched this week: M5 MacBook Pro, iPad, $3,500 Vision Pro, more

    Every product Apple launched this week: M5 MacBook Pro, iPad, $3,500 Vision Pro, more

    Jason Hiner/ZDNET

    Follow ZDNET: Add us as a preferred source on Google.


    ZDNET’s key takeaways

    • Apple’s M5 chipset will offer up to 4x the peak GPU compute performance than before.
    • The new M5 MacBook Pro, iPad Pro, and Vision Pro cost the same as…

    Continue Reading

  • Science news this week: Revived permafrost microbes spew CO2, scientists image object ‘moving’ at 99.9% the speed of light, and James Webb telescope spots something exciting blasting from black hole M87*

    Science news this week: Revived permafrost microbes spew CO2, scientists image object ‘moving’ at 99.9% the speed of light, and James Webb telescope spots something exciting blasting from black hole M87*

    This week’s science news was led by a spate of climate stories that were as worrying as they were fascinating. Topping the bill are microbes that were woken up after lying frozen in the Alaskan permafrost for up to 40,000 years, only for them to…

    Continue Reading

  • World’s smallest threadsnake has been rediscovered after 20 years

    World’s smallest threadsnake has been rediscovered after 20 years

    The Barbados threadsnake is tiny, secretive, and easy to miss in leaf litter. It is endemic to Barbados, but hasn’t been seen for 20 years. So, every verified record carries extra weight for the island and confirms that a unique line of life is…

    Continue Reading

  • ATC Islamabad issues arrest warrants for PTI Lawyers in Khawar Maneka assault case

    ATC Islamabad issues arrest warrants for PTI Lawyers in Khawar Maneka assault case

    During the hearing of the Iddat Nikah case against former Prime Minister and PTI founder Imran Khan, the Anti-Terrorism Court (ATC) in Islamabad also took up a related case concerning the alleged assault on Khawar Maneka.

    Presiding Judge Tahir…

    Continue Reading

  • Imperial College London campus to open in Nawaz Sharif IT City, announces CM Maryam Nawaz

    Imperial College London campus to open in Nawaz Sharif IT City, announces CM Maryam Nawaz

    The Punjab government has announced that a campus of Imperial College London will be established in the Nawaz Sharif IT City, Lahore. The decision was taken during a high-level meeting chaired by Chief Minister Maryam Nawaz Sharif on Saturday….

    Continue Reading

  • Kamisawa T, Wood LD, Itoi T, Takaori K. Pancreatic cancer. Lancet. 2016;388(10039):73–85.

    Article 
    PubMed 

    Google Scholar 

  • Halbrook CJ, Lyssiotis CA, Pasca di Magliano M, Maitra A. Pancreatic cancer:…

Continue Reading

  • Friend or foe? The China challenge on the Moray Firth

    Friend or foe? The China challenge on the Moray Firth

    Douglas FraserBusiness/economy editor, Scotland

    Getty Images A wind farm off the coast of Aberdeen Three wind turbines on the water spin, while a small ferry sails past nearby Getty Images

    The offer from Ming Yang would see parts built for wind turbines

    Accepting the offer to build parts for wind turbines looks like a no-brainer.

    About £1.5bn of investment, 1500 jobs – perhaps even double that – and at last, a sign that the renewables energy bonanza is going to offer some lasting benefit to Scottish manufacturing.

    Any government – Westminster, Holyrood or Highland Council – would normally be delighted by the plan for a factory making turbine blades of more than 100m in length as well as nacelles, the gearboxes weighing hundreds of tonnes which sit atop turbine towers.

    But this is not a normal offer. It comes from Ming Yang, one of the biggest industrial players in China’s rapid expansion of offshore wind, as that Asian giant has powered past the UK’s global lead.

    The company wants to locate production somewhere it can service the European market.

    Getty Images Workers in hard hats watch on as a wind turbine is loaded onto a large lorryGetty Images

    China is rapidly expanding its offshore wind market, seen here at the Dongying offshore wind power equipment industrial park in Shandong province

    Ardersier, to the east of Inverness, is a strong contender and favoured option.

    Under the ownership of a company set up to develop it, Haventus, it has 350 acres of space being developed with £400m of investment, to be ready for the boom in offshore renewables expected by the end of this decade.

    That’s the area of roughly 180 football pitches. Ardersier is the biggest industrial facility of its kind in Europe. It is included in the boundaries of the Cromarty Firth and Inverness Green Freeport, meaning generous tax breaks to attract investment.

    Around 100 acres is being prepared as lay-down space for equipment being assembled for float-out, so far most of it imported into the UK.

    The remaining 250 acres requires manufacturing to make that investment viable, a large chunk of it publicly-funded. Ming Yang would take up most of that space.

    Spy trial

    That’s if it gets the go-ahead. The company put out an unusual announcement of its plans. Usually, it would be announced once the deal was done.

    But the announcement made it clear that the hurdle it still has to clear is the UK government.

    The Chinese industrial giant was choosing to put pressure on Whitehall ministers, so that everyone knows how big the investment could be and what they could jeopardise.

    When it published the statement, late on Friday 10 October, it may have known some of what was to follow over the subsequent week, as UK politics became convulsed by one of the toughest questions facing Whitehall – of how to to handle China.

    The collapse of a planned trial of two British citizens, one from Edinburgh, accused of spying for China, had lit the fuse in September for a row that was to blow up at Westminster.

    Opposition figures were demanding to know why the Crown Prosecution Service had not received the co-operation of the UK government in providing a sufficiently strong witness statement about the risk China poses to national and economic security.

    Three witness statements provided to the prosecutors were published this week, which went some way to explaining that, yes, China is a significant threat to UK interests and capable of a large-scale espionage operation.

    Imperial powers

    But they also highlighted the dilemma at the heart of a key element of UK foreign policy.

    China is an important trading and investment partner. The UK has been courting China for decades as it became the world’s manufacturing powerhouse, and now emerges as a technological superpower.

    UK ministers have pushed at the trade doors to boost British exports of luxury goods, from cars to whisky, and they want to do far more in the service sector.

    But meanwhile, there’s a wariness, as China’s international clout has grown, and it has become ever more brazen in pursuing its national interest.

    Maybe it helps to be a former imperial power in recognising the rise of a new one.

    In much of the developing world, China’s Belt and Road initiative with developing nations has sought to ensure it has the raw materials, the growing markets and the dependent creditors with which to secure its economic interests and extend its influence.

    With developing countries, it has come to dominate some areas of exported manufacturing such as solar power, as much as it dominates toy and electronics production. With Australia, it has played hardball in securing raw materials and energy.

    Getty Images Donald Trump and Xi Jinping shake hands on a stage in front of large US and Chinese flags Getty Images

    Animosity has grown between the US and China over tariffs

    It has refused to let the US, under Donald Trump, dictate the terms of a new trading relationship, hitting back with tariffs at least as fiercely as the US president imposed them.

    China has found a vulnerable spot in America’s trading game, by curtailing export and the use of rare earths, necessary for numerous manufacturing processes.

    That is hitting the US’s closer allies too. China has the bulk of rare earth extraction, as well as the dirty processes of refining them, which other countries have been unwilling to host.

    Software sabotage

    This is similar to the way in which the US has used its technological lead to require other countries to curtail trade with China.

    It banned the use of US technology in supply chains that involved the telecoms giant Huawei. Under Joe Biden’s presidency, which became increasingly negative about China, as did the US Congress, the UK’s manufacturers were among those forced to fall into line.

    That is the outline of a complex and troubled trading relationship. The darker recesses of the relationship are also complex and wide-ranging.

    In the most recent of the witness statements to the prosecutors of the now-collapsed spy trial, deputy National Security Adviser Matthew Collins said China is capable of carrying out large-scale espionage against the UK, and that China represents “the biggest state-based threat to the country’s economic security”.

    Huawei’s presence in microchips and software within Britain’s computer systems and particularly its telecoms was seen as putting the UK under high vulnerability to surveillance, showing where people and their mobile devices are, and what they’re communicating, as well as offering ways of disabling them.

    There are concerns that TikTok’s technology could do the same, bringing a bar on its use on government mobile phones.

    Military research

    One of the main attractions of the UK to China is its world-class university system. It attracts tens of thousands of Chinese students to study in the UK.

    The dependence on Chinese fee income carries the threat of destabilising some institutions, including the more prestigious Scottish ones.

    Getty Images Glasgow University's main building, pictured from the courtyard look towards the turrets and windows on one side of the gothic building. A tree is shedding orange leaves on the grassGetty Images

    Several Scottish universities have Confucius Institutes, including the University of Glasgow

    The threat is more obvious in influence within universities, where Chinese money has funded Confucius Institutes as a focus for links. These are not only cultural, but in sensitive technology research.

    Speaking to the BBC this week, Nigel Inkster of the International Institute for Strategic Studies and formerly with the spy agency MI6, there are “a lot of cases of joint research which have clear military-defence applications, where I would have thought it would occur to those engaged to ask questions about the desirability of continuing with such activities”.

    His assessment is that the Chinese government will do whatever it takes, wherever it chooses, to protect its national interests.

    He argues that the ideology behind Beijing’s Communist Party rule means that paranoia about threats to its political dominance is hardwired and drives it to extensive surveillance.

    Steely sabotage

    A different threat emerged earlier this year with the Chinese owners of the Scunthorpe steel works, apparently running down supplies to blast furnaces close to the point where they could not be re-started.

    That brought MPs scurrying back to Westminster on a very rare Saturday sitting. They passed emergency legislation which effectively took control of the plant out of Chinese hands, asserting its importance as a strategic industrial asset that needs to be protected.

    Without it, Britain would become more dependent on imported steel, with Chinese steelmakers eager to sell Britain its lower-priced surplus.

    Getty Images Grangemouth oil refinery stands in front of the Clyde river with mountains in the background. The refinery has several tall towers, with one emitting flamesGetty Images

    Grangemouth ceased processing crude oil in April, leading to the direct loss of about 400 jobs

    A decision made to close Grangemouth oil refinery earlier this year was taken by a company half-owned by PetroChina.

    If there were strategic concerns raised within government, we didn’t hear them at the time. Instead, Petroineos was allowed to shut it down, and the government’s role was to put money into the transition of skills and the Forth Valley site for new sources of energy.

    And that brings us back to Ming Yang – not a state-owned firm, but all such private companies are subject to the requirement that they act in the Chinese government’s interests.

    The threat of mass surveillance, as with Huawei, is hardly matched by the building of turbine blades on the coast of the Moray Firth.

    So why might that £1.5bn investment cause concern to UK authorities, including the security services? Is it any worse than the 16-year Chinese ownership of a cashmere-spinning firm near Kinross?

    Self-destruct

    One reason is in industrial policy – the risk that cheaper Chinese production of turbines could undermine the growth of rival companies and countries, and grab a worryingly high share of the market. And turbine manufacture makes use of rare earths.

    That has been happening with electric vehicles. BYD vehicles claimed more than one in 30 UK car sales last month, almost ten times more than September last year.

    When Alexander Dennis announced closure of its Falkirk bus-building plant earlier this year, it cited the competition from China, taking the country’s share of UK bus sales from a tenth to more than a third within only two years.

    The other threat is in the software through which wind turbines are controlled, and the software which connects wind farms to the National Grid.

    It is possible, and not seen by China and energy experts as far-fetched, that software code could be inserted that gives the manufacturer the ability to disable the turbines.

    One specialist suggested that interference in those turbine controls could put such strains on the structures in very high winds that they could destroy themselves. And as the mainstay of Britain’s power production, that would be a vital economic asset at risk of compromise.

    ‘The Tinder of energy’

    A less dramatic inroad into the British energy system could be achieved through a new partnership between Ming Yang and Octopus Energy, biggest retailer of energy to British households and with a presence in six other retail markets.

    Their recently-signed Memorandum of Understanding begins to explore ways in which the two companies could collaborate.

    Getty Images An overhead view of the wind turbines of the Burradale wind farm, outside Lerwick in the Shetland Islands, north of the Scottish Mainland Getty Images

    Octopus wants to cut household bills. It’s investing in a rapid expansion of renewable power.

    It has an innovative way of identifying places to build onshore turbines. ‘Winder’ is an app described as ‘the Tinder of energy’ – matching communities where people want a local supply of green energy with those who want to develop wind farms.

    Ming Yang could be the supplier of the equipment, at lower prices than current suppliers, though Octopus insists the relationship would not be exclusive.

    High-level, high-stakes

    The Ming Yang factory planned for Ardersier looks focussed instead on offshore wind farms, and particularly floating turbines.

    Asked about the powers to block that plan, the UK government’s business department issued a terse two-sentence reply:

    “This is one of a number of companies that wants to invest in the UK. Any decisions made will be consistent with our national security.”

    It’s rare that the Scottish government misses an opportunity to call for more powers.

    In this case, perhaps it can see the dilemma it too would face, when a spokesman says: “We recognise that Ming Yang’s investment is subject to a decision from the UK government and look forward to the outcome of that process.”

    PA Media Director General of MI5 Sir Ken McCallum delivers the annual Director General's Speech at Thames House in front of an audiencePA Media

    Sir Ken McCallum, the head of MI5, recently warned that Chinese state operatives present a daily national security threat to the UK

    So what would be consistent with “our national security”? How does the UK government balance such concerns with the eagerness to attract foreign investment?

    It won’t say. Asked this week what the government’s position on China is, Dame Emily Thornberry, Labour chair of the Commons foreign affairs committee, said that she does not know because the government won’t say.

    Both Conservative and Labour ministers have avoided spelling out the dilemma because of the risk of causing offence in China and sparking a hostile response from Beijing.

    For that reason, a vital piece of Scotland’s energy transition hangs in the balance, at the mercy of high-level and high-stakes geopolitics.

    Continue Reading