Vanessa Williams walked the red carpet at The 2026 Powerlist Celebration of Black Excellence Awards wearing a pair of floral heels Ron White designed with her in mind. Williams paired the pumps with a green dress from the Pamella…
Blog
-

How to Watch ‘Talamasca: The Secret Order’: Premiere Date, Stream Free
If you purchase an independently reviewed product or service through a link on our website, The Hollywood Reporter may receive an affiliate commission.
This story was created in paid partnership with DIRECTV.
Anne Rice’s Immortal…
Continue Reading
-

X’s advertising boss leaves in latest departure from Elon Musk’s businesses
Unlock the Editor’s Digest for free
Roula Khalaf, Editor of the FT, selects her favourite stories in this weekly newsletter.
X’s advertising chief, once touted as a potential successor to Linda Yaccarino as chief executive, has left Elon Musk’s social media platform after only 10 months, marking the latest departure from the billionaire’s executive ranks.
John Nitti, who joined X in January as its global head of revenue operations and advertising innovation, left the company on Friday, according to people familiar with the matter.
Yaccarino, who was chief executive for two years, resigned in July. Since then, her duties have been split between several leaders including Angela Zepeda, global head of marketing, and Nitti, who was considered a contender for the CEO position by industry insiders.
His departure comes as Musk contends with an ongoing wave of senior exits across the business, which was taken over by his artificial intelligence start-up xAI in March.
Mike Liberatore, who was xAI’s chief financial officer, also quit over the summer after three months in the role, soon followed by its general counsel Robert Keele.
In early October, X’s chief financial officer Mahmoud Reza Banki, announced that he was leaving after less than a year in the role, a departure first reported by the Financial Times.
The churn reflects frustration among some executives with Musk’s sudden changes of strategy, and difficulty executing their own objectives given the hands-on approach of their billionaire boss.
X’s advertising leaders have long faced demands from Musk to boost revenues. That pressure has increased as he spends billions of dollars on infrastructure and chips in the race to develop superhuman AI to compete with the likes of OpenAI and Google’s DeepMind.
At the same time, advertisers have been put off by Musk’s decision to relax content moderation standards, citing his “free speech” ideals, and his response to marketers who disagreed with his approach to “go fuck” themselves.
Certain brands have been persuaded to return, while xAI has recently clinched media partnerships with companies such as Disney. The company has also told brands that its advertising metrics are improving due to its use of xAI’s AI technology, according to an email seen by the FT.
However, some advertisers have complained in private that they felt pressured to spend on X after it sued several brands such as Shell and Pinterest for allegedly undertaking “illegal boycott” of the platform, which they deny.
Nitti, a former Verizon executive, was among the sales leaders who had become frustrated with Musk’s approach to the advertising business, according to one insider.
In the first half of the year, Musk had been distracted by his role in Donald Trump’s administration, which ended over the summer in a falling out with the US president.
Since then, he began making unilateral decisions around advertising without consulting the advertising leadership, according to two people familiar with the matter. This included banning hashtags from advertising on X, one of the people said, which frustrated some advertisers.
xAI and X have also appointed new leadership recently. Earlier this month, Anthony Armstrong, a former Morgan Stanley banker who advised on Musk’s $44bn takeover of X, was named xAI CFO.
X did not respond to a request for comment.
Continue Reading
-

A New Galileo Project Observatory is Celebrated on the Joe Rogan Experience and NASCAR | by Avi Loeb | Oct, 2025
Press enter or click to view image in full sizeThe Galileo Observatory on top of Sphere overlooking the city of Las Vegas. (Image credit: Alex Delacroix, Lily Kuan and Ezra Kelderman on behalf of the Galileo research team) In September, 2024, two…
Continue Reading
-

Netflix shuts down game studio behind ‘Squid Game: Unleashed’
Item 1 of 2 A performer dressed as a ‘Squid Game’ soldier stands in front of the Netflix and Squid Game logos before a parade through central Seoul, followed by a fan event with cast to celebrate the release of the third season of Netflix’s hit…
Continue Reading
-
Netflix shuts down game studio behind 'Squid Game: Unleashed' – Reuters
- Netflix shuts down game studio behind ‘Squid Game: Unleashed’ Reuters
- Netflix shuts down its Squid Game mobile studio The Verge
- Netflix has seemingly shut down Boss Fight Entertainment Gamereactor UK
- Days After Hyping Games Business To Investors,…
Continue Reading
-

AI tool beats humans at detecting parasites in stool samples, Utah study finds
Scientists at ARUP Laboratories have developed an artificial intelligence (AI) tool that detects intestinal parasites in stool samples more quickly and accurately than traditional methods, potentially transforming how…
Continue Reading
-

Claudia Raschke Welcomed as New ASC Member
Claudia Raschke, ASC decided to pursue a career behind the camera after moving to New York from her native Germany to study modern dance with Martha Graham. It was a conversation with a fellow restaurant worker — who also happened to…
Continue Reading
-

Coursera (COUR) Losses Narrow, But Profitability Remains Distant Despite Slower Revenue Growth
Coursera (COUR) narrowed its losses over the past five years at an average annual rate of 7.9%, but remains unprofitable and is expected to stay in the red for at least three more years. Revenue is projected to grow 6.1% per year, which lags the broader US market’s 10% forecast, while shares currently trade at $9.20, below some analyst estimates of fair value. Against a backdrop of ongoing unprofitability and share price volatility, investors will be weighing slower growth and risks against discounted valuation and signs of operational improvement.
See our full analysis for Coursera.
Now, it’s time to see how these results measure up to the dominant stories and expectations in the market. We will dive into the prevailing narratives next.
See what the community is saying about Coursera
NYSE:COUR Earnings & Revenue History as at Oct 2025 -
Coursera’s profit margin stands at -7.1%. While it is narrowing its losses by an average of 7.9% per year, there is no expectation from analysts for the company to reach profitability within the next three years.
-
According to the analysts’ consensus view, rising demand for tech and job-relevant credentials coupled with enterprise partnerships is fueling gradual improvements in average revenue per user. However, persistent costs and only modest margin improvement have delayed any near-term path to positive earnings.
-
Consensus narrative notes that ongoing product innovation and new features could improve user retention, but heavy reliance on external partners makes faster margin expansion uncertain.
-
Expected revenue growth of just 6.1% per year will also limit how quickly these margin improvements materialize.
-
-
To see how analysts balance hopes for gradual progress with ongoing risks, check the full consensus narrative for deeper context. 📊 Read the full Coursera Consensus Narrative.
-
The share price, at $9.20, is volatile and below the single analyst price target of 12.38. The past quarter saw significant insider selling, signaling potential caution from company leadership.
-
Consensus narrative flags that even as global demand for upskilling expands the user base, weak share price trends and insider selling reinforce investor concerns about Coursera’s ability to drive consistent performance.
-
Bears argue that short-term price uncertainty and lack of profitability deter value-focused investors, especially when major holders are offloading shares.
-
The analysts’ consensus also highlights how ongoing macroeconomic pressures and competitive threats can further weigh on the stock’s stability.
-
Continue Reading
-
-

Profit Margin Slips Challenges Bullish Growth Narrative Despite Strong Revenue Outlook
Ladder Capital (LADR) posted a 22.4% annual earnings growth rate over the past five years, but most recent results show earnings have turned negative versus last year. Net profit margins slipped to 34.1% from 37.4%, and while revenue is forecast to grow at 16.7% per year, outpacing the US market, earnings are only expected to rise 10.2% annually, which trails the broader market’s 15.5% rate. Investors are likely to focus on the company’s ability to sustain above-average revenue growth and monitor ongoing shifts in profitability and income streams.
See our full analysis for Ladder Capital.
Next up, we’ll see how the latest numbers stack up against the dominant narratives, highlighting where the data supports and where it complicates the market’s expectations for Ladder Capital.
See what the community is saying about Ladder Capital
NYSE:LADR Earnings & Revenue History as at Oct 2025 -
Ladder’s debt costs have decreased thanks to achieving investment-grade status and issuing unsecured bonds, making its access to capital both cheaper and broader compared with previous years.
-
Consensus narrative notes that reduced funding costs and access to deeper capital markets help Ladder reinvest in higher-yield assets, supporting long-term earnings growth.
-
Structural changes in commercial property lending and increased demand in major US urban markets support this growth story, but analysts project profit margins to slip from 36.3% today to 33.3% over three years as competition and higher funding rates put net margins under pressure.
-
While Ladder’s diversified portfolio helps manage risk, maintaining margin stability remains a key test for bulls focusing on income sustainability.
-
-
Consensus narrative suggests Ladder’s evolving cost structure gives bulls something to cheer, but margin trends could limit future upside.
See how this narrative compares with today’s figures and analyst views: 📊 Read the full Ladder Capital Consensus Narrative.
-
Two risks top the list: dividend sustainability and questions around Ladder’s financial position, which could directly impact future payouts and investor confidence.
-
Analysts’ consensus view highlights concern that slowing commercial real estate lending and rising tenant credit risk threaten stable income streams.
-
Shrinking profit margins and exposure to longer lease terms mean that small shifts in tenant quality or rent levels may have outsize impacts on distributable earnings and book value per share.
-
Ongoing muted loan origination volumes and sector recovery delays add to the argument that investors need to keep a close watch on potential shocks to asset quality or reserves.
-
Continue Reading
-
