After seven months on the market, Assassin’s Creed Shadows has sold less on PS5 (2.4M) than Ghost of Yotei did (2.5M) in under three weeks, showing that this samurai showdown is just about settled.
When archaeologists lifted a skeleton from beneath a parking lot in Leicester in 2012, they suspected they had found England’s most contentious king, Richard III. Blunt force trauma to the skull matched battlefield accounts, and a pronounced…
Meme stocks redux! Several stocks, many with high short-interest, traded huge option volumes Wednesday. High short interest was a characteristic some speculators used to identify opportunities in the meme stock craze of early 2021. During that period, stocks like GameStop (GME) and AMC Entertainment (AMC) experienced huge moves, and participants on Reddit’s WallStreetBets forum, like Roaring Kitty, became famous (or infamous). Betting on meme stocks can be exciting — the adrenaline rush of watching volatile price swings, the camaraderie of online forums and the prospect of quick profits can make it feel like entertainment more than investing. That’s probably a good perspective to have because the most recent meme stock craze, featuring stocks like Beyond Meat (BYND) , Krispy Kreme (DNUT) , and others, is a reminder that this kind of trading should only be done with money that you’re fully prepared to lose. Lack of fundamentals At its core, the meme stock phenomenon has little to do with fundamentals. Companies like BYND and DNUT have real businesses, but those businesses are losing money. Their valuations in these surges do not stem from improvements in earnings, revenue growth or realistic market share expectations. Prices are driven instead by online narratives — posts on Reddit, X (Twitter), or TikTok — where momentum, humor and social sentiment outweigh financial analysis. That is not to say, though, that there is no rationale. The aforementioned high “short interest” is in some cases the sole reason a stock may have been chosen. The logic is that when the number of shares sold short (by those betting against the share price) is high relative to the number of shares outstanding, the large institutional short interest will eventually be forced to “cover” their short positions if a retail buying frenzy drives the stock price higher, meaning they (the institutional shorts) will be compelled to buy back the shares. This, in turn, adds more fuel to the fire and can accelerate a price increase even further. Rather than retail traders trying to “tag along” with institutional traders, they instead bet against them — sometimes promoting a “David vs Goliath” narrative along the way, insisting that a large number of retail traders can overwhelm even large and well-capitalized institutions. Sometimes they’re right. The danger is that meme stocks tend to spike rapidly and collapse just as fast, as speculators race into and out of the stock market. It’s a strategy that depends on staying ahead of the crowd, buying before the frenzy takes place, and taking profits before everyone heads for the exits. In 2021, traders in GameStop and AMC saw once-in-a-lifetime gains evaporate within weeks as liquidity dried up and retail enthusiasm faded. The same dynamic has resurfaced in 2024–25 with smaller, thinly-traded stocks like BYND and DNUT, where a few viral posts or option trades move prices dramatically. DNUT (Krispy Kreme Inc.) traded 38 times its 20-day average options volume. BYND (Beyond Meat) traded more than 3.3 million contracts, ~9.4 times its average 20-day volume. Part of the reason for the explosion in options volume is that both of these stocks are under $5 per share, which generally makes the shares ineligible for trading on margin. Options provide leverage. The stocks may also be hard or impossible to borrow for those interested in making bearish bets. Again, options permit a bearish bet when access to stock to borrow to short is limited (it cannot be overstated how risky shorting a stock in a short-squeeze can be, by the way). The most active contract Wednesday in Beyond Meat was the Oct. 24 weekly 3 strike puts, with nearly 147,000 traded at an average price of ~0.415/contract. BYND would need to fall $1 per share, or almost 28% in the next two trading days, just for that trade to break even! The weekly 4 strike calls were also active. Approximately 104k contracts traded at an average price of 1.455/contract. In this case, the stock would need to rise to $5.455/share, or more than 52%, by the end of the week just to break even! At least one, but possibly both of those options, will be worthless by Friday 4 pm. People buy lottery tickets as entertainment. They bet on sports as entertainment and they gamble on table games in Las Vegas as entertainment. If you are trading options on these stocks as entertainment, with money you can afford to lose, enjoy the ride and good luck, but do so knowing that while long-term investors make money over time, most of those buying options speculating on the direction of these stocks at the enormously high premiums these options currently command will not. DISCLOSURES: None. All opinions expressed by the CNBC Pro contributors are solely their opinions and do not reflect the opinions of CNBC, NBC UNIVERSAL, their parent company or affiliates, and may have been previously disseminated by them on television, radio, internet or another medium. THE ABOVE CONTENT IS SUBJECT TO OUR TERMS AND CONDITIONS AND PRIVACY POLICY . THIS CONTENT IS PROVIDED FOR INFORMATIONAL PURPOSES ONLY AND DOES NOT CONSITUTE FINANCIAL, INVESTMENT, TAX OR LEGAL ADVICE OR A RECOMMENDATION TO BUY ANY SECURITY OR OTHER FINANCIAL ASSET. THE CONTENT IS GENERAL IN NATURE AND DOES NOT REFLECT ANY INDIVIDUAL’S UNIQUE PERSONAL CIRCUMSTANCES. THE ABOVE CONTENT MIGHT NOT BE SUITABLE FOR YOUR PARTICULAR CIRCUMSTANCES. BEFORE MAKING ANY FINANCIAL DECISIONS, YOU SHOULD STRONGLY CONSIDER SEEKING ADVICE FROM YOUR OWN FINANCIAL OR INVESTMENT ADVISOR. Click here for the full disclaimer.
A French oil company engaged in “misleading commercial practices” about the scope of its environmental commitments, a court has ruled.
TotalEnergies, which this month said it aimed to “ramp up production of gas”, was found on Thursday to have probably misled consumers with claims about its climate policies. The civil court in Paris ordered the company to remove messages from its website that said it wanted to reach carbon neutrality by 2050 and be a big player in the energy transition.
The case, brought by NGOs including Greenpeace France and Friends of the Earth France, is the first time the country’s “greenwashing” laws have been applied to a fossil fuel company. Courts in the Netherlands and Germany have already found that airlines misled consumers with vague environmental claims.
The French court gave TotalEnergies a month to take down the misleading statements or face a fine of €10,000 (£8,700) a day. It was also ordered to post the court’s ruling on its website, with the same penalty for noncompliance, as well as to pay €8,000 to each of the three NGOs and €15,000 for their legal costs.
“The French justice system is finally tackling the impunity of fossil fuel greenwashing that Total has enjoyed until now,” said Justine Ripoll, campaigns manager at Notre Affaire à Tous, one of the NGOs that brought the case. “It sends a clear message: climate disinformation is not an acceptable business strategy.”
TotalEnergies has been approached for comment.
The company, which aims to achieve 100 gigawatts of renewable power generation by 2030 but has made fossil gas a “cornerstone” of its strategy, has said it was a multi-energy company aiming to “responsibly, cost-effectively and sustainably produce the energy that we all need in our daily lives”.
The ruling is the result of a legal action brought by NGOs in 2022 in response to a campaign when the company changed its name from Total.
The court ordered TotalEnergies to remove statements that said it placed sustainable development at the heart of its strategy and that it “contributed to the wellbeing of populations” in line with the UN’s sustainable development goals.
Judges dismissed a further accusation of greenwashing over the company’s claims about fossil gas and biofuels. The court found that although the statements contained some disputed claims, they were for informational rather than commercial purposes.
Climate activists and green groups have increasingly taken fossil fuel companies to court for environmental claims that do not align with published climate science.
skip past newsletter promotion
after newsletter promotion
In a landmark report in 2022, the Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change found that the world had enough existing and planned fossil fuel infrastructure to blow past the goal of limiting global heating to 1.5C above preindustrial levels. Meanwhile, the International Energy Agency found that “no new oil and gas” exploration was compatible with its key scenario for keeping planetary heating to that level.
Jonathan White, a lawyer for ClientEarth, which supported the NGOs, said TotalEnergies appeared to be continuing with oil and gas projects despite warnings from climate experts.
“This landmark judgment sends a clear warning shot to other oil and gas majors in Europe and beyond,” he said. “Claiming to be part of the transition while backing new fossil fuel projects comes at a tried-and-tested legal price.”
“Regretting You,” the latest film based on a blockbuster Colleen Hoover novel and the first since “It Ends With Us” infamously sparked a legal battle between its co-stars, is getting panned by critics who question whether the many…
Headway Norfolk and Waveney
