Rare dermoscopic vascular manifestations of clonal seborrheic keratosi

1Department of Occupational Disease, Hangzhou Hospital for the Prevention and Treatment of Occupational Disease, Hangzhou, Zhejiang, People’s Republic of China; 2Department of Dermatology, Zhuji People’s Hospital of Zhejiang Province, Shaoxing, Zhejiang, People’s Republic of China

Correspondence: Jie Chen, Department of Dermatology, Zhuji People’s Hospital of Zhejiang Province, 9 Jianmin Road, Shaoxing, Zhejiang, 311800, People’s Republic of China, Tel +86 15068586037, Email [email protected]

Abstract: Clonal seborrheic keratosis (SK) represents a rare histological subtype of seborrheic keratosis that is challenging to distinguish from conventional SK and other skin neoplasms based solely on clinical presentation and dermoscopic features. Current clinical observations indicate that vascular-related manifestations in this subtype are exceedingly rare. Our report herein reports the uncommon globular vascular findings identified on dermoscopic examination of clonal SK, which not only holds great significance for the diagnosis and differential diagnosis between clonal SK, ordinary SK and other cutaneous tumors, but also provides strong support for the development of standardized dermoscopic diagnostic criteria and treatment advice for clonal SK.

Keywords: clonal, seborrheic keratosis, Borst-Jadassohn phenomenon, vessel, dermoscopy

Introduction

Seborrheic keratosis (SK) is one of the most common benign epidermal tumors encountered in dermatological practice. While typically diagnosed based on characteristic clinical and dermoscopic features-such as comedo-like openings, milia-like cysts, and fissures-certain variants may pose diagnostic challenges.1,2 The presence of vessels, notably hairpin vessels, can also be observed in SK, especially when inflamed.3 Among these, clonal SK represents a distinct histopathological subtype characterized by intraepidermal nests of monomorphic keratinocytes. Dermoscopically, it often presents with a pattern of sharply demarcated, round to oval, whitish or bluish-gray globules and structureless areas.4 Notably, vascular features have rarely been described in association with this variant,4–6 and their presence may lead to diagnostic uncertainty, potentially mimicking ordinary SK and other benign or malignant neoplasms such as melanocytic lesion and basal cell carcinoma (BCC).7 Under such circumstances, the early identification and diagnosis, along with the selection of a suitable individualized treatment regimen, are of significant importance. Herein, we report a case of clonal SK presenting with uncommon globular vascular findings on dermoscopic examination, aims to provide a reference and therapeutic basis for the future dermoscopic diagnosis of clonal SK.

Case Presentation

A 70-year-old woman presented with a 10 years history of a growing-gradually, asymptomatic, pigmented lesion on her left lower leg. No treatment had been received during this period. The physical examination showed an irregular, reddish-brown flat plaque with 2cm×1.5cm of dimension, medium hardness, and non-tender (Figure 1A). Dermoscopy revealed a demarcated border lesion with diffuse yellowish-pink background with moth-eaten edges, globular blood vessels distributed in a circular pattern, multiple blue-brown globules, comedo-like and fingerprint-like pigment structures (Figure 1C and D).

Figure 1 (A) Physical examination showed an irregular, reddish-brown flat plaque with 2cm×1.5cm with a rough surface on the left lower leg. (B) The histopathology disclosed classical Borst-Jadassohn phenomenon include intraepidermal nests, horn cysts and melanin within the basaloid cells (hematoxylin-eosin staining; original magnification, ×40). (C) Dermoscopic imagines revealed multiple blue-brown globules, comedo-like and fingerprint-like pigment structures within a demarcated border lesion with diffuse yellowish-pink background with moth-eaten edges. (D) Globular blood vessels distributed in a circular pattern.

Based on the atypical dermoscopic appearance, an excisional biopsy was performed to rule out malignancy. Histopathological examination disclosed hyperkeratosis of the epidermis, the epithelial cells are arranged in a concentric whorled configuration, aggregating to form nests containing brownish pigment granules, along with lymphocytic infiltration and dilated capillaries within the dermis, corresponding to the Borst-Jadassohn phenomenon (BJP). No cytologic atypia, which diagnosis is consistent with clonal SK (Figure 1B).

Discussion

The dermoscopic identification of unequivocal vascular structures in clonal SK is exceptionally uncommon.4–6,8 While the classic dermoscopic criteria for clonal SK primarily focus on keratin-related and pigmentary patterns, our case illustrates that a distinct globular vascular pattern. This finding confirms and expands the known dermoscopic characterize of this histologic variant.

The presence of vessels in SK is generally considered uncommon and is more frequently reported in irritated or inflamed lesions.3 However, in our case, there was no histological evidence of irritation or significant inflammation. The observed dermoscopic circular-pattern globular blood vessels likely correspond to dilated capillaries trapped between the intraepidermal nests of tumor cells, representing an intrinsic architectural feature rather than a secondary change. This unique anatomical configuration explains why they manifest dermoscopically as well-defined, globular structures, as opposed to the more superficial, linear, hairpin or dotted vessels seen in conventional SK.5 Furthermore, in contrast to the classic dermoscopic pattern of SK (comedo-like and fingerprint-like pigment structures), our case exhibited a predominance of blue-brown globules, corresponding histopathologically to pigmented intraepidermal, tightly aggregated keratinocyte nests, which offers a compelling illustration of the direct correlation between its underlying histopathology and dermoscopic features.

Clinically, it is difficult to distinguish clonal SK from typical SK or other cutaneous neoplasms based on lesion morphology, as they often present as similar light brown or black papules or plaques with either a smooth or rough surface.5,9,10 As the most widely utilized non-invasive diagnostic modality in dermatology, dermoscopy holds clinical precedence over cutaneous biopsy. The presence of characteristic dermoscopic features permits a preliminary diagnosis for certain diseases.11 However, the combination of dermoscopic blue-brown globules and circular-pattern globular blood vessels in clonal SK could potentially be mistaken for the vascular patterns seen in melanocytic lesions, BCC, or Spitz nevus, creating a potential for misdiagnosis.1,7,12–15 Thus, the identification of dermoscopic hallmarks specific to clonal SK for the differentiation between clonal SK and other skin tumors would substantially contribute to refine the preoperative differential diagnosis and therapeutic decision-making.

The BJP as histopathological hallmark of clonal SK is not pathognomonic for a single entity but represents a shared architectural pattern seen in a spectrum of benign and malignant skin tumors mainly include Hidroacanthoma simplex (HS) and Bowen’s disease.16–18 Therefore, accurate diagnosis requires a thorough clinicopathological correlation, integrating key clinical features with detailed histopathological analysis. HS is a benign cutaneous tumor that poses a significant challenge for clinical differentiation from clonal SK. The key distinction lies in their differing cellular lineages on histopathology-HS comprise nests of poroid cells within an acanthotic epidermis and contain cystic or ductal structures in the nests which are absent in the basaloid keratinocyte nests of clonal SK.18 Bowen’s Disease is a in situ lesion of squamous cell carcinoma (SCC), classically presents as a solitary, slowly enlarging, well-demarcated erythematous plaque with fine scale and a crusted surface, also pose a significant diagnostic challenge by mimicking clonal SK.19 Histopathologically, Bowen’s disease can exhibit intraepidermal nesting, but the nests are composed of severely atypical keratinocytes with pleomorphic, hyperchromatic nuclei and abundant mitotic figures, characteristics that are not present in clonal SK.19 For the purpose of distinguishing clonal SK from typical SK, HS, melanocytic nevus, BCC, Bowen’s disease and Spitz nevus, a detailed summary of key diagnostic points is provided in Table 1.

Table 1 Comprehensive Differential Diagnosis of Clonal Seborrheic Keratosis

Currently, clonal SK is classified as benign cutaneous neoplasm. The polymorphic vascular patterns include linear-irregular, dotted, corkscrew, arborizing, glomerular and hairpin vessels observed under dermoscopy are generally indicative of malignant lesions due to the dysregulation of the intracellular environment.3 In contrast, the monomorphic, uniform circular-pattern globular vessels observed in our case of clonal SK are unlikely a result of active, tumor-driven angiogenesis. Instead, they are best explained by mechanically compresses and distorts of the progressive expansion intraepidermal “clonal” nests of keratinocytes, indicate not a marker of malignant potential. However, we propose that clonal SK requires a more radical therapeutic strategy as it exhibits a significantly elevated recurrence rate and a higher likelihood of progressing to SCC in comparison with typical SK, especially in incomplete excision and cytologic atypia.13,20,21 The immunohistochemical investigation of BJP reveals a core hyperproliferative phenotype with strong epidermal growth factor-receptors (EGF-R), Ki-67, p63 and p53 expression within intraepidermal nests, indicate enhanced invasive potential.22 The lesion was excised with a 1-cm margin of surrounding tissue in our case due to regarding the underlying risk of malignancy and no recurrence was observed after one-year follow-up.

Conclusions

In conclusion, our case does more than simply document a rare dermoscopic finding, it elucidates how the microscopic anatomy of clonal SK directly dictates its macroscopic dermoscopic pattern. Bridging specific dermoscopic features with their underlying pathological substrates is a crucial step towards achieving more precise, non-invasive diagnosis in clinical dermatology. In addition, the presence of the BJP in SK or other skin tumors mandates a nuanced diagnostic evaluation and therapeutic approach to rule out potential malignancy. However, evidence from reported cases remains exceedingly limited currently. Consequently, more robust data from larger cohorts with extended follow-up are necessary to confirm this finding.

Data Sharing Statement

The data that support the findings of this study are available from the corresponding author upon reasonable request.

Ethics Approval

Institutional approval for the publication of anonymized case details was granted by the Ethics Committee of Zhuji People’s Hospital of Zhejiang Province. This study was performed in accordance with the Declaration of Helsinki.

Consent Statement

A written informed consent form has been obtained from the patient, consenting to the publication of anonymous patient information in this article.

Author Contributions

All authors made a significant contribution to the work reported, whether that is in the conception, study design, execution, acquisition of data, analysis and interpretation, or in all these areas; took part in drafting, revising or critically reviewing the article; gave final approval of the version to be published; have agreed on the journal to which the article has been submitted; and agree to be accountable for all aspects of the work.

Funding

This work was supported by grants from the Zhejiang Province Medical and Health Science and Technology Plan Project (No. 2023XY199) and the Zhuji Medical and Health Technology Plan Project (No. 2023YW048).

Disclosure

The authors declare no conflicts of interest in this work.

References

1. Minagawa A. Dermoscopy-pathology relationship in seborrheic keratosis. J Dermatol. 2017;44(5):518–524. doi:10.1111/1346-8138.13657

2. Bujoreanu FC, Radaschin DS, Badea MA, et al. Psoriasis and seborrheic keratoses: insights from biologic therapy and skin imaging. Life. 2025;15(3). doi:10.3390/life15030485

3. Alvarez-Salafranca M, Gomez-Martin I, Banuls J, et al. Dermoscopy of inflamed seborrheic keratosis: a great mimic of malignancy. Australas J Dermatol. 2022;63(1):53–61. doi:10.1111/ajd.13781

4. Uzuncakmak TK, Akay BN, Ozkanli S. Different dermoscopic features of clonal seborrhoeic keratoses. Br J Dermatol. 2019;180(1):197–198. doi:10.1111/bjd.17087

5. Ramyead S, Diaz-Cano SJ, Pozo-Garcia L. Dermoscopy of clonal seborrheic keratosis. J Am Acad Dermatol. 2015;73(2):e47–9. doi:10.1016/j.jaad.2015.04.013

6. Wang JC, Liu J. A case of clonal seborrheic keratosis with characteristic dermoscopic features. Chin Med J. 2020;133(4):499–500. doi:10.1097/CM9.0000000000000630

7. Vatamanesku I, Parasca SV, Parasca OM, et al. Basal cell carcinoma of the nasal pyramid excision margins: a retrospective study. Rom J Morphol Embryol. 2019;60(4):1261–1268.

8. Namiki T, Nojima K, Hashimoto T, et al. Borst-Jadassohn phenomenon arising from a seborrhoeic keratosis and its characteristic dermoscopic features. Clin Exp Dermatol. 2018;43(8):940–941. doi:10.1111/ced.13653

9. Wozniak-Rito AM, Rudnicka L. Bowen’s disease in dermoscopy. Acta Dermatovenerol Croat. 2018;26(2):157–161.

10. Yagerman SE, Marghoob AA. Clonal seborrheic keratosis versus epidermal nevus. J Am Acad Dermatol. 2013;69(2):e43–4. doi:10.1016/j.jaad.2013.02.023

11. Campos-do-Carmo G, Ramos-e-Silva M. Dermoscopy: basic concepts. Int J Dermatol. 2008;47(7):712–719. doi:10.1111/j.1365-4632.2008.03556.x

12. Udare S, Patil P. Clonal seborrheic keratosis: a diagnostic dilemma. Dermatol Pract Concept. 2021;11(4):e2021095. doi:10.5826/dpc.1104a95

13. Goldsmith JF, Montaser Kouhsari L, Tahan SR. Clonal-pattern seborrheic keratosis: risk of recurrence and progression to carcinoma. Am J Surg Pathol. 2022;46(12):1642–1649. doi:10.1097/PAS.0000000000001973

14. Lallas A, Apalla Z, Ioannides D, et al. Update on dermoscopy of Spitz/Reed naevi and management guidelines by the international dermoscopy society. Br J Dermatol. 2017;177(3):645–655. doi:10.1111/bjd.15339

15. Cabrera R, Recule F. Unusual clinical presentations of malignant melanoma: a review of clinical and histologic features with special emphasis on dermatoscopic findings. Am J Clin Dermatol. 2018;19(Suppl 1):15–23. doi:10.1007/s40257-018-0373-6

16. Yanagihara S, Oiso N, Hirota N, et al. Acantholytic bowen’s disease histopathologically showing the borst-jadassohn phenomenon. Eur J Dermatol. 2019;29(3):332–333. doi:10.1684/ejd.2019.3545

17. Baykal C, Buyukbabani N, Babuna G, et al. Giant bowen’s disease histologically showing borst-jadassohn phenomenon and complicated with squamous cell carcinoma development. J Eur Acad Dermatol Venereol. 2016;30(10):e88–e89. doi:10.1111/jdv.13335

18. Souza BCE, Luce MCA, Cunha T, et al. Dermatoscopy of the borst-jadassohn phenomenon in hidroacanthoma simplex. An Bras Dermatol. 2020;95(1):95–97. doi:10.1016/j.abd.2019.03.004

19. Palaniappan V, Karthikeyan K. Bowen’s disease. Indian Dermatol Online J. 2022;13(2):177–189. doi:10.4103/idoj.idoj_257_21

20. Takayama E, Takai T, Fujimoto M, et al. Bowen disease with sebaceous differentiation arising from clonal seborrheic keratosis. J Dermatol. 2024;51(10):1350–1354. doi:10.1111/1346-8138.17180

21. Bouhamed M, Bacha D, Abdelmoula F, et al. Clonal seborrheic keratosis: a rare skin tumor. Pan Afr Med J. 2019;34:54. doi:10.11604/pamj.2019.34.54.13415

22. Lora V, Chouvet B, Kanitakis J. The “intraepidermal epithelioma” revisited: immunohistochemical study of the borst-jadassohn phenomenon. Am J Dermatopathol. 2011;33(5):492–497. doi:10.1097/DAD.0b013e3181fe6f90

Continue Reading