Sánchez, M. A. A multi-level perspective on financial technology transitions. Technol. Forecast. Soc. Chang. 181, 121766 (2022).
Arner, D. W. et al. Sustainability, fintech and financial inclusion. Eur. Bus. Organ. Law Rev. 21, 7–35 (2020).
Macchiavello, E. & Siri, M. Sustainable finance and fintech: can technology contribute to achieving environmental goals? A preliminary assessment of green fintech and sustainable digital finance. Eur. Co. Financial Law Rev. 19 (1), 128–174 (2022).
Shanmuganathan, M. Behavioural finance in an era of artificial intelligence: longitudinal case study of robo-advisors in investment decisions. J. Behav. Experimental Finance. 27, 100297 (2020).
Alkaraan, F. et al. Sustainable strategic investment decision-making practices in UK companies: the influence of governance mechanisms on synergy between industry 4.0 and circular economy. Technol. Forecast. Soc. Chang. 187, 122187 (2023).
Tan, G. K. S. Robo-advisors and the financialization of Lay investors. Geoforum 117, 46–60 (2020).
Google Scholar
Bei, J. & Wang, C. Renewable energy resources and sustainable development goals: evidence based on green finance, clean energy and environmentally friendly investment. Resour. Policy. 80, 103194 (2023).
Folqué, M., Escrig-Olmedo, E., Corzo, T. & Santamaría Sustainable development and financial system: integrating ESG risks through sustainable investment strategies in a climate change context. Sustain. Dev. 29 (5), 876–890 (2021).
Chen, L. & Aklikokou, A. K. Determinants of E-government adoption: testing the mediating effects of perceived usefulness and perceived ease of use. Int. J. Public. Adm. 43 (10), 850–865 (2020).
Nguyen, T. P. L. et al. Factors influencing acceptance of Robo-Advisors for wealth management in Malaysia. Cogent Eng. 10 (1), 2188992 (2023).
Google Scholar
Tan, Y. & Zhu, Z. The effect of ESG rating events on corporate green innovation in china: the mediating role of financial constraints and managers’ environmental awareness. Technol. Soc. 68, 101906 (2022).
Asif, M. & Sarwar, F. Impact of customer relationship management, financial literacy and social influence on online banking adoption: the moderating role of personal innovativeness. Asia-Pacific J. Bus. Adm. 17 (3), 744–764 (2024).
Kasmon, B. et al. FinTech application in Islamic social finance in Asia region: a systematic literature review. Int. J. Ethics Syst. 41 (1), 213–237 (2025).
Ho, S. M., Ocasio-Velázquez, M. & Booth, C. Trust or consequences? Causal effects of perceived risk and subjective norms on cloud technology adoption. Computers Secur. 70, 581–595 (2017).
Namahoot, K. S. & Laohavichien, T. Assessing the intentions to use internet banking: the role of perceived risk and trust as mediating factors. Int. J. Bank. Mark. 36 (2), 256–276 (2018).
Gupta, S. & Dey, D. K. Risk perception and adoption of digital innovation in mobile stock trading. J. Consumer Behav. 23 (2), 639–654 (2024).
Galeone, G., Ranaldo, S. & Fusco, A. ESG and fintech: are they connected? Res. Int. Bus. Finance. 69, 102225 (2024).
Knewtson, H. S. & Rosenbaum, Z. A. Toward Understanding fintech and its industry. Managerial Finance. 46 (8), 1043–1060 (2020).
Sciarelli, M. et al. Socially responsible investment strategies for the transition towards sustainable development: the importance of integrating and communicating ESG. TQM J. 33 (7), 39–56 (2021).
Roh, T., Park, B. I. & Xiao, S. S. Adoption of AI-enabled Robo-advisors in fintech: simultaneous employment of UTAUT and the theory of reasoned action. J. Electron. Commer. Res. 24 (1), 29–47 (2023).
Gigante, G. & Zago, A. DARQ technologies in the financial sector: artificial intelligence applications in personalized banking. Qualitative Res. Financial Markets. 15 (1), 29–57 (2023).
Amnas, M. B. et al. Understanding the determinants of fintech adoption: integrating UTAUT2 with trust theoretic model. J. Risk Financial Manage. 16 (12), 505 (2023).
Macchiavello, E. & Siri, M. Sustainable finance and fintech: Can technology contribute to achieving environmental goals? A preliminary assessment of ‘green fintech’and ‘sustainable digital finance’. European Company and Financial Law Review, 19 (1), 128–174 (2022).
Saqib, N. et al. Harnessing digital solutions for sustainable development: a quantile-based framework for designing an SDG framework for green transition. Environ. Sci. Pollut. Res. 30 (51), 110851–110868 (2023).
Shan, S., Umar, M. & Mirza, N. Can robo advisors expedite carbon transitions? Evidence from automated funds. Technol. Forecast. Soc. Chang. 180, 121694 (2022).
Naseer, M. M. et al. Sustainable investments in volatile times: nexus of climate change risk, ESG practices, and market volatility. Int. Rev. Financial Anal. 95, 103492 (2024).
Chakraborty, D. et al. Corporate governance and investment decisions of retail investors in equity: do group affiliation and firm age matter? Managerial Auditing J. 38 (1), 1–34 (2023).
Google Scholar
Davis, F. D. Perceived usefulness, perceived ease of use, and user acceptance of information technology. MIS Q. 13, 319–340 (1989).
Wang, J. S. Exploring biometric identification in fintech applications based on the modified TAM. Financial Innov. 7 (1), 42 (2021).
Bagozzi, R. P. The legacy of the technology acceptance model and a proposal for a paradigm shift. J. Association Inform. Syst. 8 (4), 243–254 (2007).
Schierz, P. G., Schilke, O. & Wirtz, B. W. Understanding consumer acceptance of mobile payment services: an empirical analysis. Electron. Commer. Res. Appl. 9 (3), 209–216 (2010).
Pavlou, P. A. Consumer acceptance of electronic commerce: integrating trust and risk with the technology acceptance model. Int. J. Electron. Commer. 7 (3), 101–134 (2003).
Hung, N. T. & Hang, V. T. T. A studying on factors affecting decision to use smart tourism applications using extended TAM. WSEAS Trans. Bus. Econ. 17, 288–299 (2020).
Balaskas, S. et al. FinTech services adoption in greece: the roles of trust, government support, and technology acceptance factors. FinTech 3 (1), 83–101 (2024).
Chueca, C. & Ferruz Agudo, L. Fintech and sustainability: do they affect each other? Sustainability 13 (13), 7012 (2021).
Bajunaied, K., Hussin, N. & Kamarudin, S. Behavioral intention to adopt fintech services: an extension of unified theory of acceptance and use of technology. J. Open. Innovation: Technol. Market Complex. 9 (1), 100010 (2023).
Belanche, D., Casaló, L. V. & Flavián, C. Artificial intelligence in fintech: Understanding robo-advisors adoption among customers. Industrial Manage. Data Syst. 119 (7), 1411–1430 (2019).
Faradynawati, I. A. A. & Söderberg, I. L. Sustainable investment preferences among robo-advisor clients. Sustainability 14 (19), 12636 (2022).
Au, C. D. et al. Business model of sustainable robo-advisors: empirical insights for practical implementation. Sustainability 13 (23), 13009 (2021).
Khalil, M. K. & Khalil, R. Leveraging buyers’ interest in ESG investments through sustainability awareness. Sustainability 14 (21), 14278 (2022).
Karwowski, M. & Raulinajtys-Grzybek, M. The application of corporate social responsibility (CSR) actions for mitigation of environmental, social, corporate governance (ESG) and reputational risk in integrated reports. Corp. Soc. Responsib. Environ. Manag. 28 (4), 1270–1284 (2021).
Orgeldinger, J. Digital transformation with robo-advising and AI in asset management: A critical appraisal. J. AI Rob. Workplace Autom. 3 (2), 151–167 (2024).
Bohn, J., Goldberg, L. R. & Ulucam, S. Sustainable investing from a practitioner’s viewpoint: what’s in your ESG portfolio. J. Invest. Manage. 20 (2), 14–29 (2022).
Rousseau, S. et al. ESG tech: attractions and challenges for fintechs in the age of COVID-19. Bank. Finance Law Rev. 37 (1), 57–96 (2021).
Jo, H. Understanding the key antecedents of users’ continuance intention in the context of smart factory. Technol. Anal. Strateg. Manag. 35 (2), 153–166 (2023).
Yi, T. Z. et al. The adoption of robo-advisory among millennials in the 21st century: trust, usability and knowledge perception. Sustainability 15 (7), 6016 (2023).
Asl, M. G. et al. Fintech’s impact on conventional and Islamic sustainable equities: Short-and long-term contributions of the digital financial ecosystem. Glob. Financ. J. 62, 101022 (2024).
Islam, H. et al. Nexus between perception, purpose of use, technical challenges and satisfaction for mobile financial services: theory and empirical evidence from Bangladesh. Technological Sustain. 3 (2), 147–170 (2024).
Sabir, A. A. et al. Consumer acceptance and adoption of AI robo-advisors in fintech industry. Mathematics 11 (6), 1311 (2023).
Paetzold, F. & Busch, T. Unleashing the powerful few: sustainable investing behaviour of wealthy private investors. Organ. Environ. 27 (4), 347–367 (2014).
Akhmedova, A., Vila-Brunet, N. & Mas-Machuca, M. Building trust in sharing economy platforms: trust antecedents and their configurations. Internet Res. 31 (4), 1463–1490 (2021).
Ng, E. & Pan, S. L. Competitive strategies for ensuring fintech platform performance: evidence from multiple case studies. Inform. Syst. J. 34 (3), 616–641 (2024).
Addy, W. A. et al. Data-driven sustainability: how fintech innovations are supporting green finance. Eng. Sci. Technol. J. 5 (3), 760–773 (2024).
Al-Somali, S. A., Gholami, R. & Clegg, B. An investigation into the acceptance of online banking in Saudi Arabia. Technovation 29 (2), 130–141 (2009).
Tyrväinen, O., Karjaluoto, H. & Saarijärvi, H. Personalization and hedonic motivation in creating customer experiences and loyalty in omnichannel retail. J. Retailing Consumer Serv. 57, 102233 (2020).
Li, M. W., Teng, H. Y. & Chen, C. Y. Unlocking the customer engagement-brand loyalty relationship in tourism social media: the roles of brand attachment and customer trust. J. Hospitality Tourism Manage. 44, 184–192 (2020).
Hassan, M. S. et al. Drivers influencing the adoption intention towards mobile fintech services: a study on the emerging Bangladesh market. Information 13 (7), 349 (2022).
Davis, F. D., Bagozzi, R. P. & Warshaw, P. R. User acceptance of computer technology: A comparison of two theoretical models. Manage. Sci. 35 (8), 982–1003 (1989).
Saif, M. A. et al. Determinants of the intention to adopt digital-only banks in malaysia: the extension of environmental concern. Sustainability 14 (17), 1–32 (2022).
Cheng, J. C. et al. Building customer satisfaction with tour leaders: the roles of customer trust, justice perception, and Cooperation in group package tours. Asia Pac. J. Tourism Res. 22 (4), 395–407 (2017).
Malär, L. et al. Emotional brand attachment and brand personality: the relative importance of the actual and the ideal self. J. Mark. 75 (4), 35–52 (2011).
Samala, N. et al. Investigating the role of participation and customer-engagement with tourism brands (CETB) on social media. Acad. Mark. Stud. J. 23 (1), 1–16 (2019).
Google Scholar
Touni, R. et al. Antecedents and an outcome of customer engagement with hotel brand community on Facebook. J. Hospitality Tourism Res. 44 (2), 278–299 (2020).
Hair, J. et al. An updated and expanded assessment of PLS-SEM in information systems research. Industrial Manage. Data Syst. 117 (3), 442–458 (2017).
Henseler, J., Ringle, C. M. & Sinkovics, R. R. The use of partial least squares path modeling in international marketing, in new challenges to international marketingp. 277–319 (Emerald Group Publishing Limited, 2009).
D’Souza, C. et al. CSR investments and innovation–Aligning and creating shared value. J. Clean. Prod. 481, 144189 (2024).
Rodríguez, N. G., Pérez, M. J. S. & Gutiérrez, J. A. T. Can a good organizational climate compensate for a lack of top management commitment to new product development? J. Bus. Res. 61 (2), 118–131 (2008).
Hair, J. F. et al. When to use and how to report the results of PLS-SEM. Eur. Bus. Rev. 31 (1), 2–24 (2019).
Fornell, C. & Larcker, D. F. Evaluating structural equation models with unobservable variables and measurement error. J. Mark. Res. 18 (1), 39–50 (1981).
Henseler, J., Ringle, C. M. & Sarstedt, M. A new criterion for assessing discriminant validity in variance-based structural equation modeling. J. Acad. Mark. Sci. 43, 115–135 (2015).
Hair, J. F. et al. An assessment of the use of partial least squares structural equation modeling in marketing research. J. Acad. Mark. Sci. 40, 414–433 (2012).
Tenenhaus, M. et al. PLS path modeling. Comput. Stat. Data Anal. 48 (1), 159–205 (2005).
Google Scholar
Voorhees, C. M. et al. Discriminant validity testing in marketing: an analysis, causes for concern, and proposed remedies. J. Acad. Mark. Sci. 44, 119–134 (2016).
Shahzad, M. F. et al. Effect of stakeholder pressure on environmental performance: do virtual CSR, green credit, environmental and social reputation matter? J. Environ. Manage. 368, 122223 (2024).
Google Scholar
Bhatia, A. et al. Role of financial literacy and trust in perceived usefulness of robo advisory services. in international conference on information and communication technology for competitive strategies. Springer. (2023).
Kumar, J. & Rani, V. Financial innovation and gender dynamics: a comparative study of male and female FinTech adoption in emerging economies. In. J. Account. Inf. Ma. ahead-of-print(ahead-of-print) (2024).
Adeoye, O. B. et al. Integrating artificial intelligence in personalized insurance products: a pathway to enhanced customer engagement. Int. J. Manage. Entrepreneurship Res. 6 (3), 502–511 (2024).
Wang, M., Cho, S. & Denton, T. The impact of personalization and compatibility with past experience on e-banking usage. Int. J. Bank. Mark. 35 (1), 45–55 (2017).
Asif, M. & Sarwar, F. Customer relationship management, financial literacy, and online banking adoption: social influence moderation-insights from technology adoption. RADS J. Bus. Manage. 5 (2), 129–144 (2023).