Dopamine D2 receptor modulation of insulin receptor signaling in the central amygdala: implications for compulsive-like eating behavior

Absence of D2Rs increases compulsive-like eating

We evaluated compulsive-like eating in wild-type (WT) and dopamine D2R knock-out (Drd2^−/−) mice by employing a palatable food (PF) self-acquisition task. When a mouse pressed the active lever, a sucrose pellet (i.e., PF) was delivered. After 7 days, the number of lever presses required to obtain PF was increased, shifting from a fixed ratio of 1 (FR1) to FR2 and FR3 training schedules (Fig. 1A). Both groups successfully acquired lever pressing as the sessions progressed (Fig. 1B, C), although Drd2^−/− mice displayed slightly less active lever pressing than WT mice across sessions, probably due to decreased locomotor activity in these mice [27]. During FR1 to FR3 sessions, both WT and Drd2^−/− mice exhibited significantly increased active lever pressing than inactive lever press, demonstrating that the increase in lever pressing is specific to PF-seeking (Supplementary Fig. 1B–E).

After the FR3 sessions, additional FR3 sessions with delivery of electric foot shock (FS) were administered (FR3 + FS), and the perseverance of lever pressing to obtain PF despite the delivery of foot shocks was used as an indicator of compulsive-like food-seeking. Surprisingly, Drd2^−/− mice exhibited significantly higher active lever pressing despite receiving foot shocks (Fig. 1B, D), showing perseverance in reward-seeking despite punishment. In contrast, WT mice exhibited significantly increased inactive lever press compared to active lever during FR3 + FS sessions (Supplementary Fig. 1F). When the rewards were omitted and only foot shocks were delivered (FS only), lever pressing was comparable between WT and Drd2^−/− mice (Fig. 1B, E, Supplementary Fig. 1B, G), indicating similar sensitivity to foot shocks, but greater compulsivity in Drd2^−/− mice, driving active lever pressing despite punishment. These data, together with previous observations [11], indicate that the absence of D2Rs promotes compulsive-like eating behavior.

CeA D2Rs regulate compulsive-like eating

To further address the role of D2Rs in the control of compulsive eating, we targeted D2Rs in the CeA based on our previous finding that CeA D2Rs play a crucial role in reward-related impulsive and compulsive behaviors [11]. We generated Drd2 ^flox/flox mice (Supplementary Fig. 2) and injected AAV-Cre-eGFP virus into the CeA to selectively eliminate D2R expression in the CeA (CeA-Drd2KO mice) (Fig. 1F), resulting in a 73% reduction in D2R expression in CeA-Drd2KO mice (Cre-GFP) compared with control flox mice in which AAV-eGFP virus was injected (CeA-Drd2WT, GFP) (Fig. 1G, H). We then trained mice in the PF self-acquisition task.

Both control (GFP) and CeA-Drd2KO (Cre-GFP) mice displayed successful FR1-FR3 performance with no difference between groups (Fig. 1I, J, Supplementary Fig. 3B–E). However, CeA-Drd2KO mice (Cre-GFP) showed more active lever pressing than CeA-Drd2WT mice (GFP) during the FR3 + FS sessions (Fig. 1I, K) while CeA-Drd2WT mice exhibited significantly increased inactive lever press compared to active lever during FR3 + FS sessions (Supplementary Fig. 3F). In FS-only sessions, both CeA-Drd2WT and CeA-Drd2KO mice showed low levels of lever pressing (Fig. 1I, L, Supplementary Fig. 3G). Taken together, these data suggest that D2Rs in the CeA critically contribute to the compulsive-like perseverance of PF-seeking behavior.

CeA D2Rs regulate InsR signaling

Recent reports indicate that InsRs are highly expressed in the CeA and are associated with reduced food intake [28,29,–30]. Using Drd2-EGFP mice, we observed abundant expression of InsRs in the CeA and found that ~61% of CeA D2R- expressing neurons co-expressed InsRs (Fig. 2A, B). Interestingly, in Drd2^−/− mice, InsR expression was decreased to 42% in the CeA compared with WT mice (Fig. 2C, D). In addition, in CeA-specific Drd2 KO (CeA-Drd2KO) mice, InsR expression was reduced by ~60% compared with control CeA-Drd2WT mice (Fig. 2E–G).

A D2R and InsR expression in the CeA of Drd2-eGFP mice. Left: Low magnification. Right: High magnification of area in the yellow box shown in the left. Red: InsR, green: Drd2-eGFP, blue: DAPI. B Quantitative analysis of D2R and InsR expression in the CeA of Drd2-eGFP mice. Drd2-eGFP n = 6 (8 sections/mouse). C InsR expression in the CeA of WT and Drd2^−/− mice. Green: InsR, blue: DAPI. D Proportion of InsR-expressing cells in the CeA of WT and Drd2^−/− mice. Unpaired Student’s t-test, two-tailed,***p = 0.0005. WT n = 3, Drd2^−/− n = 3 (6sections/mouse). E Schematic diagram of AAV-GFP or AAV-Cre-GFP injection into the CeA of Drd2^flox/flox mice. F Left: Representative images of GFP or Cre-GFP virus expression in the CeA in low magnification. Right: InsR expression in the CeA of GFP and Cre-GFP virus- injected mice as detected by immunohistochemistry. Red; InsR, Green: GFP or Cre-GFP, Blue: DAPI. Scale bar: low magnification, 100 μm, high magnification, 20 μm. G Quantitative analysis of InsR expression in the CeA. The proportion of InsR expression in GFP and Cre-GFP-injected Drd2^flox/flox mice. Unpaired Student’s t-test, two-tailed, *p = 0.0123. GFP n = 3, Cre-GFP n = 3. H Expression of pInsR^Tyr972 with GFP or Cre-GFP-injected Drd2^flox/flox mice. Saline/Insulin (10 mU)/quinpirole (1 µg) was infused 30 min before sacrifice. Left: low-magnification of the CeA of saline(S), insulin(I), or quinpirole(Q)-infused mice. Middle/Right: high-magnification of pInsR^Tyr972 expression in the CeA detected by immunohistochemistry. Quantitative analysis: three sections of one hemisphere/mouse, 4mice/group. Red: pInsR^Tyr972, Green: GFP/Cre-GFP, Blue: DAPI, Arrowhead: pInsR^Tyr972-positive cells. I pInsR^Tyr972 expression in the CeA of GFP or Cre-GFP-injected Drd2^flox/flox mice. Two-way ANOVA, Bonferroni posthoc tests, group×drug interaction: F_2,18 = 9.09, **p = 0.0019. GFP S/I/Q n = 4, Cre-GFP S/I/Q n = 4. J pAkt^Ser473 expression in the CeA of GFP or Cre-GFP-injected Drd2^flox/flox mice. Two- way ANOVA, Bonferroni posthoc tests, group×drug interaction: F_2,26 = 5.66, **p = 0.0091, GFP S/I/Q n = 6, Cre-GFP S/Q n = 5, Cre-GFP I n = 4. K Expression of pPTP1B^Ser50 in CeA of GFP/Cre-GFP-injected Drd2^flox/flox mice. Quantitative analysis: three sections of one hemisphere/mouse, n=4mice/group. Red: pPTP1B, Green: GFP/Cre-GFP, Blue: DAPI, Arrowhead: pPTP1B-positive cells. L pPTP1B^Ser50 expression. Two-way ANOVA,Bonferroni posthoc tests, group×drug interaction: F_2,18 = 5.13, *p = 0.0173, GFP S/I/Q n = 4, Cre-GFP S/I/Q n = 4. Scale bars in all images: low-magnification, 100μm, high-magnification, 20μm. All values in the data represent mean ± SEM.

We next examined InsR activity by assessing insulin-mediated phosphorylation of InsRs in the CeA of CeA-Drd2WT (Drd2^flox/flox + GFP) and CeA- Drd2KO (Drd2^flox/flox+Cre-GFP) mice as well as the possible regulation of InsR phosphorylation by a D2R agonist. We analyzed phosphorylation of Tyr-972 (pInsR^Tyr972), an important residue for the recruitment of IRS-1, phosphorylation of Tyr1162/1163 (pInsR^Tyr1162/1163) in the activation loop of the InsR catalytic domain [31, 32], and phosphorylation of Akt (pAkt^Ser473) in the downstream InsR signaling cascade [32]. After 12 h of food deprivation, saline, insulin (10 mU), or D2R agonist quinpirole (1 μg) were infused into the CeA. A robust increase in the number of pInsR^Tyr972-positive cells was observed 30 min after insulin or quinpirole infusion in CeA-Drd2WT mice (Drd2^flox/flox + GFP), whereas CeA-Drd2KO mice (Drd2^flox/flox+Cre-GFP) showed higher basal levels of pInsR^Tyr972-positive cells, but no increase after insulin or quinpirole infusion (Fig. 2H, I, Supplementary Fig. 4A). Insulin or quinpirole infusion significantly increased the number of pInsR^Tyr1162/1163-positive cells in the CeA of CeA-Drd2WT mice (GFP). By contrast, CeA-Drd2KO mice (Cre-GFP) showed a higher basal level of pInsR^Tyr1162/1163-positive cells, but insulin or quinpirole infusion had little or no effect on their levels (Supplementary Fig. 4B, D, E). Insulin or quinpirole infusion significantly increased the number of pAKT^Ser473-positive cells in the CeA of CeA-Drd2WT mice but not in CeA-Drd2KO mice (Fig. 2J, Supplementary Fig. 4C, D).

To understand how the D2R activation induces the tyrosine phosphorylation of InsRs, we hypothesized that D2R activation with Gi protein coupling promotes the phosphorylation of InsRs. Several studies demonstrate that the cAMP-inhibiting Gi proteins, including G_αi2, positively regulate InsR activation [33,34,35,–36]. By contrast, the expression and activity of protein-tyrosine phosphatase 1B (PTP1B) is decreased in tissue expressing constitutively active Gα_i2 [37]. We examined the involvement of PTP1B by analyzing the phosphorylation level of PTP1B at Ser50 (pPTP1B^Ser50), which negatively modulates its phosphatase activity, thus creating a positive feedback mechanism for insulin signaling [38]. We observed that D2R activation by quinpirole significantly increased the number of pPTP1B^Ser50-positive cells in CeA-Drd2WT (Drd2^flox/flox + GFP) mice, whereas insulin or quinpirole infusion had little or no effect on number of pPTP1B^Ser50-positive cells in CeA-Drd2KO mice (Drd2^flox/flox+Cre-GFP) (Fig. 2K, L and Supplementary Fig. 4F). These data suggest that D2R activation induces PTP1B inhibition and impairs its ability to dephosphorylate InsRs, leading to increased insulin signaling. Thus, the stimulation of CeA D2Rs may induce concomitant activation of InsR signaling in the CeA, and the absence of D2Rs severely impairs InsR signaling.

CeA InsRs impact compulsive-like eating

We next tested the effect of selective loss of InsR expression in CeA D2R- expressing neurons on compulsive-like eating behavior. To accomplish this, we used a gene knockdown strategy with Cre-dependent AAV vectors expressing a short-hairpin RNA (shRNA) targeting InsRs to induce cell type-specific loss of function while simultaneously visualizing recombination through mCherry labeling using AAV-DIO-DSE-mCherry-PSE-shInsR [39]. Selective expression of shInsR in D2R- expressing neurons in the CeA (CeA-D2R^shInsR) resulted in an ~80% reduction in InsR expression compared with control mice in which AAV-DIO-eYFP was injected (CeA-D2R^eYFP) (Fig. 3A–C). We found that D2R-specific loss of InsRs in the CeA exacerbated compulsive-like eating phenotype, as evidenced by robust perseverance of active lever pressing despite foot shock punishment (Fig. 3D–F, Supplementary Fig. 5B–F). In FS-only sessions, no difference in lever pressing was observed between control and CeA-D2R^shInsR mice (Fig. 3D, G, Supplementary Fig. 5G). Together, these data suggest that InsRs and the interaction between InsRs and D2Rs in the CeA are critical for the control of compulsive-like eating behavior.

A Schematic diagram of AAV-DIO-eYFP or AAV-DIO-DSE-mCherry-PSE-shInsR injection into the CeA of Drd2-Cre mice. B Representative InsR expression in the CeA of CeA-D2R^eYFP control and CeA-D2R^shInsR mice. Virus expression was observed in three sections per mouse used for experiments. CeA-D2R^eYFP n = 3, CeA-D2R^shInsR n = 3. Red: eYFP or shInsR, green: InsR, blue: DAPI. Scale bar: low magnification, 100 μm, high magnification, 20 μm. C Quantitative analysis of InsR expression in the CeA of CeA-D2R^eYFP control and CeA-D2R^shInsR mice. CeA-D2R^eYFP n = 3, CeA-D2R^shInsR n = 3. Unpaired student’s t-test, two-tailed, *p = 0.0344. D Number of active lever presses per hour by CeA-D2R^eYFP and CeA-D2R^shInsR mice across days. CeA-D2R^eYFP n = 3, CeA-D2R^shInsR n = 4. E Number of active lever presses per hour in FR1 to FR3 sessions. One-way ANOVA followed by Bonferroni post hoc tests, #p < 0.05, ###p < 0.001 vs. FR1. CeA-D2R^eYFP n = 3, CeA-D2R^shInsR n = 4. F Number of active lever presses per hour in the first 3 days of FR3 + FS sessions. Unpaired Student’s t-test, two-tailed, **p = 0.0061. CeA-D2R^eYFP n = 3, CeA- D2R^shInsR n = 4. G Number of active lever presses per hour in FS only sessions. CeA-D2R^eYFP n = 3, CeA-D2R^shInsR n = 4. All values in the data represent mean ± SEM.

PF and insulin modulate CeA D2R-expressing neuronal activity

To understand how CeA D2R-expressing neurons respond to PF, we used fiber photometry to perform in vivo calcium imaging. We virally expressed the Cre- dependent calcium indicator GCaMP6s (AAV-DIO-GCaMP6s-mCherry) in the CeA of Drd2-Cre mice (Fig. 4A) and recorded changes in GCaMP6s fluorescence signal through an optic fiber placed above CeA D2R-expressing neurons during exposure to PF in a light/dark box test. Histological analysis revealed that ~96% of GCaMP6-expressing cells overlapped with Cre-expressing CeA D2R-expressing cells (Fig. 4B, C). After measuring baseline body weight and food intake, mice underwent a pre-test without food for 15 min to measure their time spent in the light and dark chambers of the light/dark box [11]. Mice were then divided into two groups: one group was fed a NC diet, and the other group was fed a PF diet high in sugar and fat ad libitum for 14 days. After a 48-h PF withdrawal, mice were returned to the light/dark box for 15 min, with PF placed in the light chamber, to assess compulsive-like eating behavior [11], during which we recorded GCaMP signals from CeA D2R-expressing neurons (Fig. 4D). As shown by peri-event time histogram (PETH) analysis, there was a significant decrease in z-score (i.e., normalized ΔF/F) during PF consumption (Fig. 4E, G), whereas no significant change in GCaMP signal was observed during exposure to NC (Fig. 4E, F), indicating a decrease in CeA D2R-expressing neuronal activity in response to PF. This suppression was accompanied by increased PF intake in the light chamber, supporting a link between reduced D2R neuron activity and compulsive-like eating behavior (Fig. 4H).

A Left: diagram of AAV-DIO- GCaMP6s injection into the CeA of Drd2-Cre mice. Right: Representative images of AAV-DIO-GCaMP6s virus expression in the CeA at low magnification. Virus expression was observed in three sections per mouse. Scale bar: 100 μm. Drd2– Cre n = 3. B Colocalization of Cre- and GCaMP6s-positive cells in the CeA. Red; Cre, green; GCaMP6s, blue; DAPI. Scale bar: 20 μm. C Quantification of Cre- and GCaMP6s-positive cells in the CeA of three Drd2-Cre mice. D Experimental scheme of the light/dark box test with fiber photometry. NC; normal chow, PF; palatable food. E Normalized z-score during NC and PF consumption. F Average z-score pre- ( − 2 to 0 s) and post- (0 to +10 s) NC consumption. Drd2-Cre n = 8. G Average z-score pre (-2s to 0 s) and post (0 s to +10 s) PF consumption. Drd2-Cre n = 12. Paired student’s t-test, two- tailed, *p = 0.0023. H Food consumption for 10 min. Drd2-Cre NC n = 7, Drd2-Cre PF n = 11. Unpaired student’s t-test, two-tailed, ***p = 0.0007. All values in the data represent mean ± SEM.

We next recorded changes in the GCaMP6s signal from CeA D2R-expressing neurons during exposure to PF in the light/dark box test after infusion of saline, quinpirole, insulin, quinpirole+insulin, or the D2 receptor antagonist sulpiride into the CeA (Fig. 5A). Under saline infusion, CeA D2R neurons exhibited significantly reduced activity during PF consumption (Fig. 5B, C), consistent with the dynamics observed in Fig. 4E, and G. Quinpirole or insulin infusion, also induced significant reductions in z-scores during PF consumption (Fig. 5D–F) which was accompanied by a reduction in PF consumption (Fig. 5D–F, L). However, when quinpirole and insulin were co-infused, the suppression of neuronal activity was alleviated (Fig. 5D, G, L) corresponding to reduced PF consumption. In contrast, sulpiride infusion resulted in a significant suppression of neuronal activity and an increase in PF consumption (Fig. 5H, I, L), while its effect was slightly reversed by quinpirole (Fig. 5H, J, L) and fully alleviated by quinpirole+insulin, which also reduced PF consumption (Fig. 5H, K, L). These data indicate that D2R activation in the presence of insulin effectively enhances CeA D2R-expressing neuronal activity, thereby contributing to the suppression of PF consumption.

A Experimental scheme of light/dark box test and fiber photometry with drug infusion. B Normalized z-score during PF consumption after saline infusion. C Average z-score during PF consumption after saline infusion. Saline: Drd2-Cre n = 7. Paired student’s t-test, two-tailed, **p = 0.0095. D Normalized z-score during PF consumption after quinpirole (1 µg), insulin (5 mU), or quinpirole+insulin infusion. E-G Average z-score during PF consumption after drug infusion. E Quinpirole: Drd2-Cre n = 10. Paired student’s t-test, two-tailed, *p = 0.0153. F Insulin: Drd2-Cre n = 10. Paired student’s t-test, two-tailed, **p = 0.0045. G Quin+Ins: Drd2-Cre n = 9. Paired student’s t-test, two-tailed, p = 0.3200. H Normalized z-score during PF consumption after sulpiride (1 µg), sulpiride+quinpirole, or sulpiride+quinpirole+insulin infusion. I-K Average z-score on pre (-2s to 0 s) and post (0 s to +10 s) during PF consumption after drug infusion. I Sulpiride: Drd2-Cre n = 12. Paired student’s t-test, two-tailed, **p = 0.0021. J Sulp+Quin: Drd2-Cre n = 13. Paired student’s t-test, two-tailed, *p = 0.0442. K Sulp+Quin+Ins: Drd2-Cre n = 11. Paired student’s t-test, two-tailed, p = 0.8766. L PF consumption for 10 min. in drug-infused mice. Saline, Quinpirole, Insulin, Quin+Ins Drd2-Cre n = 13. Repeated measure One-way ANOVA, Bonferroni posthoc tests **p = 0.0048, #p < 0.05 vs. saline. Sulpiride, Sulp+Quin, and Sulp+Quin+Ins Drd2– Cre n = 13. Repeated measure One-way ANOVA, Bonferroni posthoc tests, ***p = 0.0002, †††p < 0.001 vs. saline, **p < 0.01, ***p < 0.001 vs. group. Solid line: average z-score of food consumption. Shaded line: standard error of the mean. All values in the data represent mean ± SEM.

We further explored the effect of insulin on CeA D2R neuronal activity by ex vivo electrophysiological recordings in brain slices from Drd2-EGFP mice. Bath application of quinpirole alone (10 µM) failed to significantly change the membrane excitability of D2R-expressing CeA neurons (Supplementary Fig. 6A–E). CeA D2R neurons did not show significant changes in rheobase or membrane potential. However, when co-treated with insulin (500 nM), quinpirole dramatically depolarized their resting membrane potential and increased their excitability, as shown by decreased rheobase and enhanced input resistance (Supplementary Fig. 6C–E). When insulin alone was perfused into the recording chamber, it significantly hyperpolarized the resting membrane potential of CeA D2R neurons and decreased their firing probabilities by increasing rheobase and reducing input resistance (Supplementary Fig. 6F–J). These ex vivo electrophysiological studies suggest that the activation of D2Rs and InsRs has a synergistic effect that substantially increases the excitability of D2R neurons in the CeA. Furthermore, this interaction may be critical for the regulation of compulsive-like eating behavior, supporting our GCaMP6s photometry analysis following quinpirole or insulin infusion.

Next, we examined the effect of selective optogenetic inhibition of CeA D2R-positive neurons expressing halorhodopsin in the CeA of Drd2-Cre mice by injecting AAV-DIO-eNpHR3.0-eYFP virus (Fig. 6A, B) and conducted the light/dark box test (Fig. 6C–H). Bilateral photoinhibition of CeA D2R neurons resulted in a significant and specific increase in palatable food consumption in the light compartment (Fig. 6G, H and Supplementary Video 1). We further tested whether InsR signaling contributes to the regulation of CeA D2R-mediated PF consumption by selectively activating CeA D2R neurons. To this end, we injected AAV-DIO-eYFP (eYFP) or AAV-DIO-ChR2-eYFP (ChR2) into the CeA of Drd2-Cre mice followed by CeA infusion of the InsR antagonist S961 (Supplementary Fig. 7, Supplementary Fig. 8A, B). Mice underwent the light/dark box test, and pre-test evaluations revealed no differences in basal body weight, food intake, or light/dark box preference between groups expressing eYFP (control) or ChR2 in CeA D2R neurons (Supplementary Fig. 8C–F). Following this, the mice were divided into two groups: one group was maintained on a NC diet, while the other was provided with PF for 14 days. Afterward, mice were reintroduced to the light/dark box for a 25-minute test, with PF placed in the light compartment. Fifteen minutes before testing, mice received CeA infusions of either saline or S961.

A Diagram of AAV-DIO-eNpHR3.0-eYFP injection into the CeA. B Experimental scheme of light/dark box test using optogenetic inhibition. Optic stimulation: 532 nm, 5 mW, continuous. C-D Basal body weight and food intake for 1 week. E-F Time spent in each box and the number of crossovers during 15-min pre-test. G Food consumption in light box during 10-min total laser-off and -on periods. Two- way ANOVA, Bonferroni post hoc tests, genotype × laser interaction: F_1,20 = 18.86, p = 0.0003, **p < 0.01 vs. WT, ##p < 0.01 vs. laser-off. H Time course of food consumption in laser-off and -on 5-min periods. Green shaded-square: laser-on period. Unpaired student’s t-test, two-tailed, *p = 0.0261, **p = 0.0019. WT NC/PF n = 6, Drd2-Cre NC n = 5, PF n = 6. All values in the data represent mean ± SEM. I proposed interplay between D2Rs and InsRs in the CeA. A decrease in CeA D2R-expressing neuronal activity is associated with palatable food (PF) consumption. Activation of D2R induces InsR phosphorylation via Gi protein coupling and PTP1B inhibition as demonstrated in this study. The synergistic activation of D2Rs and InsRs enhances CeA D2R-expressing neuron activity, thereby controlling PF intake. Conversely, loss or blockade of D2Rs disrupts InsR signaling, leading to reduced CeA D2R-expressing neuron activity and increased PF consumption. Therefore, proper coordination between D2R and InsR signaling is critical for fine-tuning brain insulin sensitivity and managing normal or maladaptive eating behavior.

In the PF-fed group, optogenetic activation of CeA D2R neurons significantly suppressed PF consumption in ChR2-expressing mice. However, this suppression was abolished when S961 was infused into the CeA, demonstrating that InsR signaling is necessary for CeA D2R-mediated regulation of compulsive-like PF consumption (Supplementary Fig. 8G, H). These findings indicate that CeA D2R neurons, in conjunction with InsR signaling, are critical for modulating compulsive-like eating behavior specific to PF. In the NC group, however, optogenetic activation of CeA D2R neurons had no effect on NC consumption, even after six hours of food deprivation prior to testing. Furthermore, S961 infusion did not alter NC consumption in either eYFP control or ChR2-expressing mice (Supplementary Fig. 8G, H). Together, these data indicate that reduced CeA D2R-expressing neuronal activity is associated with increased PF consumption whereas activation of CeA D2R neurons suppresses compulsive-like eating in an InsR-dependent manner (Fig. 6I).

DA release during PF consumption and its modulation by CeA D2R knockdown

Next, we examined changes in DA release in the CeA in response to PF using the genetically encoded fluorescence DA sensor GRAB-DA2m [40]. We prepared two groups of Drd2-Cre mice: one receiving AAV- DIO-DSE-mCherry-PSE-shLacZ in the CeA as a control (shLacZ) and the other receiving AAV- DIO-DSE-mCherry-PSE-shD2R (shD2R) for selective D2R knockdown in CeA D2R neurons (Supplemental method). Selective expression of shD2R in D2R-expressing CeA neurons resulted in a ~ 77% reduction in D2R expression compared to the control group injected with shLacZ (Supplementary Fig. 9A–C). Both groups were injected with AAV-hSyn-GRAB_DA2m viruses bilaterally into the CeA and a fiber optic cannula was implanted unilaterally to enable real-time measurement of DA levels during PF-seeking behavior (Supplementary Fig. 9A, D). After one week of NC access, there was no significant difference in the GRAB signal between the shLacZ and shD2R mice (Supplementary fig. 9F, G). Subsequently, mice were randomly assigned to two groups: one with limited PF access (1 hr/day, PF limited) and the other with extended PF access (24 hr/day, PF extended) for two weeks (Supplementary Fig. 9D). In the PF-limited condition, shD2R mice consumed approximately 64% of their daily caloric intake during the 1-hour PF access period, significantly more than shLacZ mice, despite similar overall daily caloric intake between groups. This behavior indicates binge-like eating in shD2R mice with CeA D2R downregulation (Supplementary Fig. 9E). In the PF-extended condition, both groups displayed similar daily caloric intakes, derived almost exclusively from PF consumption (Supplementary Fig. 9E). In terms of body weight, PF-extended shD2R mice showed a slight, non-significant increase compared to shLacZ mice (Supplementary Fig. 9F).

After two weeks of PF exposure, DA release profiles during PF consumption were similar between shLacZ and shD2R mice in the PF-limited condition. However, in the PF-extended condition, shD2R mice exhibited a blunted DA signal in the CeA compared to shLacZ controls (Supplementary Fig. 9I–L), These findings indicate that CeA D2R deficiency leads to attenuated DA release under prolonged PF exposure, emphasizing the importance of CeA D2R in modulating reward-related DA signaling.