- Labour pledged to decide on 150 major infrastructure projects within five years, but half (52%) of all such decisions in 2025 have faced a delay by ministers
- Across 14 delayed projects, ministers have been responsible for 1,333 days of dithering beyond the initial three-month decision period
- At current rates, the Government is set to miss its target by nearly a third, approving just 107 projects instead of 150
- One in six approved projects also face legal challenges that can delay delivery by a year or more
Ministers are stifling major infrastructure projects through dithering and delay, new analysis shows. Despite Labour’s pledge to accelerate delivery, ministerial indecision has added nearly four years of cumulative delay in 2025 alone, and the Government is already falling behind its target of deciding on 150 projects by 2029.
A briefing published today by the Centre for Policy Studies reveals that of 27 major projects that have had or were expecting a decision in 2025, 14 (52%) have been delayed beyond the statutory three-month period for ministerial sign-off.
The consequences are severe. The Cambridge Waste Water Treatment Plant, which would have unlocked 8,500 homes, faced a six-month ministerial delay before eventually being cancelled due to rising costs, to which the delay undoubtedly contributed. Over £80m was spent on planning, including £14m by the council, only for the project to be scrapped.
Delays and uncertainty make infrastructure more expensive and harder to build. Projects must either risk demobilising staff or postpone construction until consent is secured. With a coin toss’s chance of facing delays of unknown length, even projects that are approved promptly are impacted by the uncertainty in the system.
Legal challenges compound the problem. One in six approved projects face court battles that can delay delivery by a year or more. Both airport expansions approved this year, Luton and Gatwick, now face legal challenges, a warning sign for the Government’s Heathrow third runway ambitions.
The Government is already falling behind its 150-project target. Ministers have made 32 decisions between the start of the Parliament and the end of 2025 but should have made 45 to stay on track. And analysis of the major projects pipeline suggests that, even without further delays or withdrawals, there will not be enough projects coming forward – in part due to the cost and uncertainty of the process. At current rates, the Government will approve just 107 major projects by 2029, missing its target by nearly a third.
Ben Hopkinson, Head of Housing and Infrastructure at the Centre for Policy Studies, said:
‘Labour promised to be the builders, not the blockers. Instead, ministers have presided over nearly four years of cumulative delay to major projects in 2025 alone. When half of all infrastructure decisions are delayed by ministerial dithering, you can’t blame the planning system – you have to blame the people making the decisions.
‘These delays have real consequences by slowing delivery, raising costs, and deterring investment. Unless the Government gets a grip, they’re on track to miss their own infrastructure target by a third.’
ENDS
NOTES TO EDITORS
- Nationally Significant Infrastructure Projects (NSIPs) include large energy plants, motorways, railways, and airport expansions
- The NSIP approval process is meant to take around 15 months from acceptance to decision, with the final three-month period for ministerial sign-off
- Ben Hopkinson is the Head of Housing and Infrastructure at the Centre for Policy Studies
- ‘Dithering not Delivering’ is available under embargo here
- For further comment and media requests, please contact Emma Revell on 07931 698246 or [email protected]
- The Centre for Policy Studies is one of the oldest and most influential think tanks in Westminster. With a focus on taxation, economic growth, housing, immigration, and energy abundance, its goal is to develop policies that widen enterprise, ownership and opportunity
Date Added: Tuesday 23rd December 2025