Brodie, J. P. & Strader, J. Extragalactic globular clusters and galaxy formation. Annu. Rev. Astron. Astrophys. 44, 193–267 (2006).
Google Scholar
Simon, J. D. The faintest dwarf galaxies. Annu. Rev. Astron. Astrophys. 57, 375–415 (2019).
Google Scholar
Simon, J. D. et al. Timing the r-process enrichment of the ultra-faint dwarf galaxy Reticulum II. Astrophys. J. 944, 43 (2023).
Google Scholar
Ji, A. P., Frebel, A., Simon, J. D. & Chiti, A. Complete element abundances of nine stars in the r-process galaxy Reticulum II. Astrophys. J. 830, 93 (2016).
Google Scholar
Rodriguez, C. L. et al. The observed rate of binary black hole mergers can be entirely explained by globular clusters. Res. Not. Am. Astron. Soc. 5, 19 (2021).
Portegies Zwart, S. F., Baumgardt, H., Hut, P., Makino, J. & McMillan, S. L. W. Formation of massive black holes through runaway collisions in dense young star clusters. Nature 428, 724–726 (2004).
Google Scholar
Häberle, M. et al. Fast-moving stars around an intermediate-mass black hole in ω Centauri. Nature 631, 285–288 (2024).
Google Scholar
Bañares-Hernández, A., Calore, F., Camalich, J. M. & Read, J. I. New constraints on the central mass contents of Omega Centauri from combined stellar kinematics and pulsar timing. Astron. Astrophys. 693, A104 (2025).
Google Scholar
Evans, A. J., Strigari, L. E. & Zivick, P. Dark and luminous mass components of Omega Centauri from stellar kinematics. Mon. Not. R. Astron. Soc. 511, 4251–4264 (2022).
Google Scholar
Carlberg, R. G. & Grillmair, C. J. The dark matter halo of M54. Astrophys. J. 935, 14 (2022).
Google Scholar
Wan, Z. et al. Dynamics in the outskirts of four Milky Way globular clusters: it’s the tides that dominate. Mon. Not. R. Astron. Soc. 519, 192–207 (2023).
Google Scholar
Grudić, M. Y. et al. Great balls of FIRE – I. The formation of star clusters across cosmic time in a Milky Way-mass galaxy. Mon. Not. R. Astron. Soc. 519, 1366–1380 (2023).
Google Scholar
Ashman, K. M. & Zepf, S. E. The formation of globular clusters in merging and interacting galaxies. Astrophys. J. 384, 50–61 (1992).
Google Scholar
Sameie, O. et al. Formation of proto-globular cluster candidates in cosmological simulations of dwarf galaxies at z > 4. Mon. Not. R. Astron. Soc. 522, 1800–1813 (2023).
Google Scholar
Naoz, S. & Narayan, R. Globular clusters and dark satellite galaxies through the stream velocity. Astrophys. J. Lett. 791, L8 (2014).
Google Scholar
Lake, W. et al. The Supersonic Project: star formation in early star clusters without dark matter. Astrophys. J. Lett. 956, L7 (2023).
Google Scholar
Peebles, P. J. E. & Dicke, R. H. Origin of the globular star clusters. Astrophys. J. 154, 891 (1968).
Google Scholar
Fall, S. M. & Rees, M. J. A theory for the origin of globular clusters. Astrophys. J. 298, 18–26 (1985).
Google Scholar
Kravtsov, A. V. & Gnedin, O. Y. Formation of globular clusters in hierarchical cosmology. Astrophys. J. 623, 650–665 (2005).
Google Scholar
Peebles, P. J. E. Dark matter and the origin of galaxies and globular star clusters. Astrophys. J. 277, 470–477 (1984).
Google Scholar
Boley, A. C., Lake, G., Read, J. & Teyssier, R. Globular cluster formation within a cosmological context. Astrophys. J. Lett. 706, L192–L196 (2009).
Google Scholar
Gutcke, T. A. Low-mass globular clusters from stripped dark matter halos. Astrophys. J. 971, 103 (2024).
Google Scholar
Mashchenko, S. & Sills, A. Globular clusters with dark matter halos. II. Evolution in a tidal field. Astrophys. J. 619, 258–269 (2005).
Google Scholar
Baumgardt, H. & Mieske, S. High mass-to-light ratios of ultra-compact dwarf galaxies – evidence for dark matter?. Mon. Not. R. Astron. Soc. 391, 942–948 (2008).
Google Scholar
Vitral, E. & Boldrini, P. Properties of globular clusters formed in dark matter mini-halos. Astron. Astrophys. 667, A112 (2022).
Google Scholar
Kim, C.-G. & Ostriker, E. C. Momentum injection by supernovae in the interstellar medium. Astrophys. J. 802, 99 (2015).
Google Scholar
Agertz, O. et al. EDGE: the mass–metallicity relation as a critical test of galaxy formation physics. Mon. Not. R. Astron. Soc. 491, 1656–1672 (2020).
Google Scholar
Larsen, S. S., Brodie, J. P., Huchra, J. P., Forbes, D. A. & Grillmair, C. J. Properties of globular cluster systems in nearby early-type galaxies. Astron. J. 121, 2974–2998 (2001).
Google Scholar
Renaud, F., Agertz, O. & Gieles, M. The origin of the Milky Way globular clusters. Mon. Not. R. Astron. Soc. 465, 3622–3636 (2017).
Google Scholar
Gray, E. I. et al. EDGE: a new model for nuclear star cluster formation in dwarf galaxies. Mon. Not. R. Astron. Soc. 539, 1167–1179 (2025).
Google Scholar
Kirby, E. N. et al. The universal stellar mass–stellar metallicity relation for dwarf galaxies. Astrophys. J. 779, 102 (2013).
Google Scholar
Rey, M. P. et al. EDGE: from quiescent to gas-rich to star-forming low-mass dwarf galaxies. Mon. Not. R. Astron. Soc. 497, 1508–1520 (2020).
Google Scholar
Lahén, N., Naab, T. & Szécsi, D. Star clusters forming in a low-metallicity starburst – rapid self-enrichment by (very) massive stars. Mon. Not. R. Astron. Soc. 530, 645–667 (2024).
Google Scholar
Lahén, N. et al. The GRIFFIN project—formation of star clusters with individual massive stars in a simulated dwarf galaxy starburst. Astrophys. J. 891, 2 (2020).
Google Scholar
Calura, F. et al. Sub-parsec resolution cosmological simulations of star-forming clumps at high redshift with feedback of individual stars. Mon. Not. R. Astron. Soc. 516, 5914–5934 (2022).
Google Scholar
Schneider, A., Smith, R. E., Macciò, A. V. & Moore, B. Non-linear evolution of cosmological structures in warm dark matter models. Mon. Not. R. Astron. Soc. 424, 684–698 (2012).
Google Scholar
Lapi, A. et al. Astroparticle constraints from cosmic reionization and primordial galaxy formation. Universe 8, 476 (2022).
Google Scholar
Bond, H. E. Where is population III? Astrophys. J. 248, 606–611 (1981).
Google Scholar
Trussler, J. A. A. et al. On the observability and identification of Population III galaxies with JWST. Mon. Not. R. Astron. Soc. 525, 5328–5352 (2023).
Google Scholar
Martin, N. F. et al. A stellar stream remnant of a globular cluster below the metallicity floor. Nature 601, 45–48 (2022).
Google Scholar
Errani, R. et al. The Pristine survey – XVIII. C-19: tidal debris of a dark matter-dominated globular cluster? Mon. Not. R. Astron. Soc. 514, 3532–3540 (2022).
Google Scholar
Simon, J. D. et al. Eridanus III and DELVE 1: carbon-rich primordial star clusters or the smallest dwarf galaxies? Astrophys. J. 976, 256 (2024).
Google Scholar
Hayes, C. R. et al. GHOST commissioning science results: identifying a new chemically peculiar star in Reticulum II. Astrophys. J. 955, 17 (2023).
Google Scholar
Jeon, M., Besla, G. & Bromm, V. Highly r-process enhanced stars in ultra-faint dwarf galaxies. Mon. Not. R. Astron. Soc. 506, 1850–1861 (2021).
Google Scholar
Rey, M. P. et al. EDGE: the origin of scatter in ultra-faint dwarf stellar masses and surface brightnesses. Astrophys. J. Lett. 886, L3 (2019).
Google Scholar
Rey, M. P. et al. EDGE: what shapes the relationship between H i and stellar observables in faint dwarf galaxies?. Mon. Not. R. Astron. Soc. 511, 5672–5681 (2022).
Google Scholar
Orkney, M. D. A. et al. EDGE: the shape of dark matter haloes in the faintest galaxies. Mon. Not. R. Astron. Soc. 525, 3516–3532 (2023).
Google Scholar
Eisenstein, D. J. & Hut, P. HOP: a new group-finding algorithm for N-body simulations. Astrophys. J. 498, 137 (1998).
Google Scholar
Knollmann, S. R. & Knebe, A. AHF: Amiga’s halo finder. Astrophys. J. Suppl. Ser. 182, 608 (2009).
Google Scholar
Katz, N. & White, S. D. M. Hierarchical galaxy formation: overmerging and the formation of an X-ray cluster. Astrophys. J. 412, 455–478 (1993).
Google Scholar
Ade, P. A. R. et al. Planck 2013 results. XVI. Cosmological parameters. Astron. Astrophys. 571, A16 (2014).
Google Scholar
Teyssier, R. Cosmological hydrodynamics with adaptive mesh refinement-A new high resolution code called RAMSES. Astron. Astrophys. 385, 337–364 (2002).
Google Scholar
Kravtsov, A. V., Klypin, A. A. & Khokhlov, A. M. Adaptive refinement tree: a new high-resolution N-body code for cosmological simulations. Astrophys. J. Suppl. Ser. 111, 73–94 (1997).
Google Scholar
Pontzen, A. et al. EDGE: a new approach to suppressing numerical diffusion in adaptive mesh simulations of galaxy formation. Mon. Not. R. Astron. Soc. 501, 1755–1765 (2021).
Google Scholar
Stopyra, S., Pontzen, A., Peiris, H., Roth, N. & Rey, M. P. GenetIC—a new initial conditions generator to support genetically modified zoom simulations. Astrophys. J. Suppl. Ser. 252, 28 (2021).
Google Scholar
Roth, N., Pontzen, A. & Peiris, H. V. Genetically modified haloes: towards controlled experiments in ΛCDM galaxy formation. Mon. Not. R. Astron. Soc. 455, 974–986 (2016).
Google Scholar
Rey, M. P. & Pontzen, A. Quadratic genetic modifications: a streamlined route to cosmological simulations with controlled merger history. Mon. Not. R. Astron. Soc. 474, 45–54 (2018).
Google Scholar
Rosen, A. & Bregman, J. N. Global models of the interstellar medium in disk galaxies. Astrophys. J. 440, 634 (1995).
Google Scholar
Agertz, O., Kravtsov, A. V., Leitner, S. N. & Gnedin, N. Y. Toward a complete accounting of energy and momentum from stellar feedback in galaxy formation simulations. Astrophys. J. 770, 25 (2013).
Google Scholar
Andersson, E. P., Agertz, O., Renaud, F. & Teyssier, R. INFERNO: galactic winds in dwarf galaxies with star-by-star simulations including runaway stars. Mon. Not. R. Astron. Soc. 521, 2196–2214 (2023).
Google Scholar
Andersson, E. P., Agertz, O. & Renaud, F. How runaway stars boost galactic outflows. Mon. Not. R. Astron. Soc. 494, 3328–3341 (2020).
Google Scholar
Steinwandel, U. P., Bryan, G. L., Somerville, R. S., Hayward, C. C. & Burkhart, B. On the impact of runaway stars on dwarf galaxies with resolved interstellar medium. Mon. Not. R. Astron. Soc. 526, 1408–1427 (2023).
Google Scholar
Andersson, E. P. et al. EDGE-INFERNO: simulating every observable star in faint dwarf galaxies and their consequences for resolved-star photometric surveys. Astrophys. J. 978, 129 (2025).
Google Scholar
Dalla Vecchia, C. & Schaye, J. Simulating galactic outflows with kinetic supernova feedback. Mon. Not. R. Astron. Soc. 387, 1431–1444 (2008).
Google Scholar
Dalla Vecchia, C. & Schaye, J. Simulating galactic outflows with thermal supernova feedback. Mon. Not. R. Astron. Soc. 426, 140–158 (2012).
Google Scholar
Kravtsov, A. V. On the origin of the global Schmidt law of star formation. Astrophys. J. 590, L1–L4 (2003).
Google Scholar
Saitoh, T. R. et al. Toward first-principle simulations of galaxy formation: I. How should we choose star-formation criteria in high-resolution simulations of disk galaxies? Publ. Astron. Soc. Jpn. 60, 667–681 (2008).
Google Scholar
Hopkins, P. F. et al. Galaxies on FIRE (Feedback In Realistic Environments): stellar feedback explains cosmologically inefficient star formation. Mon. Not. R. Astron. Soc. 445, 581–603 (2014).
Google Scholar
Rey, M. P. et al. EDGE: the emergence of dwarf galaxy scaling relations from cosmological radiation-hydrodynamics simulations. Mon. Not. R. Astron. Soc. 541, 1195–1217 (2025).
Google Scholar
Prgomet, M. et al. EDGE: the sensitivity of ultra-faint dwarfs to a metallicity-dependent initial mass function. Mon. Not. R. Astron. Soc. 513, 2326–2334 (2022).
Google Scholar
Orkney, M. D. A. et al. EDGE: two routes to dark matter core formation in ultra-faint dwarfs. Mon. Not. R. Astron. Soc. 504, 3509–3522 (2021).
Google Scholar
Orkney, M. D. A., Read, J. I., Petts, J. A. & Gieles, M. Globular clusters as probes of dark matter cusp-core transformations. Mon. Not. R. Astron. Soc. 488, 2977–2988 (2019).
Google Scholar
Orkney, M. D. A. et al. EDGE: the puzzling ellipticity of Eridanus II’s star cluster and its implications for dark matter at the heart of an ultra-faint dwarf. Mon. Not. R. Astron. Soc. 515, 185–200 (2022).
Google Scholar
Klypin, A., Prada, F., Yepes, G., Heß, S. & Gottlöber, S. Halo abundance matching: accuracy and conditions for numerical convergence. Mon. Not. R. Astron. Soc. 447, 3693–3707 (2015).
Google Scholar
Knebe, A. et al. Haloes gone MAD: The Halo-Finder Comparison Project. Mon. Not. R. Astron. Soc. 415, 2293–2318 (2011).
Google Scholar
Pujol, A. et al. Subhaloes gone Notts: the clustering properties of subhaloes. Mon. Not. R. Astron. Soc. 438, 3205–3221 (2014).
Google Scholar
Forouhar Moreno, V. J. et al. Assessing subhalo finders in cosmological hydrodynamical simulations. Preprint at https://arxiv.org/abs/2502.06932 (2025).
McInnes, L., Healy, J. & Astels, S. hdbscan: hierarchical density based clustering. J. Open Source Softw. 2, 205 (2017).
Google Scholar
Plummer, H. C. On the problem of distribution in globular star clusters. Mon. Not. R. Astron. Soc. 71, 460–470 (1911).
Google Scholar
Pontzen, A., Roškar, R., Stinson, G. & Woods, R. pynbody: N-body/SPH analysis for python (2013).
Pontzen, A. & Tremmel, M. TANGOS: the agile numerical galaxy organization system. Astrophys. J. Suppl. Ser. 237, 23 (2018).
Google Scholar
Girardi, L. et al. The ACS Nearby Galaxy Survey Treasury. IX. Constraining asymptotic giant branch evolution with old metal-poor galaxies. Astrophys. J. 724, 1030–1043 (2010).
Google Scholar
Marigo, P. et al. Evolution of asymptotic giant branch stars. II. Optical to far-infrared isochrones with improved TP-AGB models. Astron. Astrophys. 482, 883–905 (2008).
Google Scholar
Kravtsov, A. V. The size–virial radius relation of galaxies. Astrophys. J. Lett. 764, L31 (2013).
Google Scholar
Pace, A. B. The Local Volume Database: a library of the observed properties of nearby dwarf galaxies and star clusters. Preprint at https://doi.org/10.48550/arXiv.2411.07424 (2024).
Kim, D. & Jerjen, H. A hero’s little horse: discovery of a dissolving star cluster in Pegasus. Astrophys. J. 799, 73 (2015).
Google Scholar
Torrealba, G., Belokurov, V. & Koposov, S. E. Nine tiny star clusters in Gaia DR1, PS1, and DES. Mon. Not. R. Astron. Soc. 484, 2181–2197 (2019).
Google Scholar
Voggel, K. et al. Probing the boundary between star clusters and dwarf galaxies: a MUSE view on the dynamics of Crater/Laevens I. Mon. Not. R. Astron. Soc. 460, 3384–3397 (2016).
Google Scholar
Weisz, D. R. et al. A Hubble Space Telescope study of the enigmatic Milky Way halo globular cluster crater. Astrophys. J. 822, 32 (2016).
Google Scholar
Cerny, W. et al. Six more ultra-faint Milky Way companions discovered in the DECam Local Volume Exploration survey. Astrophys. J. 953, 1 (2023).
Google Scholar
Martin, N. F. et al. SMASH 1: a very faint globular cluster disrupting in the outer reaches of the LMC? Astrophys. J. Lett. 830, L10 (2016).
Google Scholar
Mau, S. et al. A faint halo star cluster discovered in the Blanco Imaging of the Southern Sky Survey. Astrophys. J. 875, 154 (2019).
Google Scholar
Balbinot, E. et al. A new Milky Way halo star cluster in the Southern Galactic Sky. Astrophys. J. 767, 101 (2013).
Google Scholar
Homma, D. et al. Boötes. IV. A new Milky Way satellite discovered in the Subaru Hyper Suprime-Cam Survey and implications for the missing satellite problem. Publ. Astron. Soc. Jpn. 71, 94 (2019).
Google Scholar
Mau, S. et al. Two ultra-faint Milky Way stellar systems discovered in early data from the DECam Local Volume Exploration survey. Astrophys. J. 890, 136 (2020).
Google Scholar
Fadely, R. et al. Segue 3: an old, extremely low luminosity star cluster in the Milky Way’s halo. Astron. J. 142, 88 (2011).
Google Scholar
Muñoz, R. R. et al. A MegaCam survey of outer halo satellites. III. Photometric and structural parameters. Astrophys. J. 860, 66 (2018).
Google Scholar
Conn, B. C., Jerjen, H., Kim, D. & Schirmer, M. On the nature of ultra-faint dwarf galaxy candidates. I. DES1, Eridanus III, and Tucana V. Astrophys. J. 852, 68 (2018).
Google Scholar
Longeard, N. et al. Detailed study of the Milky Way globular cluster Laevens 3. Mon. Not. R. Astron. Soc. 490, 1498–1508 (2019).
Google Scholar
Cerny, W. et al. DELVE 6: an ancient, ultra-faint star cluster on the outskirts of the Magellanic Clouds. Astrophys. J. Lett. 953, L21 (2023).
Google Scholar
Longeard, N. et al. The pristine dwarf-galaxy survey – III. Revealing the nature of the Milky Way globular cluster Sagittarius II. Mon. Not. R. Astron. Soc. 503, 2754–2762 (2021).
Google Scholar
Mutlu-Pakdil, B. et al. A deeper look at the new Milky Way satellites: Sagittarius II, Reticulum II, Phoenix II, and Tucana III. Astrophys. J. 863, 25 (2018).
Google Scholar
Richstein, H. et al. Deep Hubble Space Telescope photometry of Large Magellanic Cloud and Milky Way ultrafaint dwarfs: a careful look into the magnitude–size relation. Astrophys. J. 967, 72 (2024).
Google Scholar
Muñoz, R. R. et al. The discovery of an ultra-faint star cluster in the constellation of Ursa Minor. Astrophys. J. Lett. 753, L15 (2012).
Google Scholar
Luque, E. et al. Deep SOAR follow-up photometry of two Milky Way outer-halo companions discovered with Dark Energy Survey. Mon. Not. R. Astron. Soc. 478, 2006–2018 (2018).
Google Scholar
Cerny, W. et al. Discovery of an ultra-faint stellar system near the Magellanic Clouds with the DECam Local Volume Exploration Survey. Astrophys. J. 910, 18 (2021).
Google Scholar
Gatto, M. et al. Deep very large telescope photometry of the faint stellar system in the Large Magellanic Cloud periphery YMCA-1. Astrophys. J. Lett. 929, L21 (2022).
Google Scholar
Kim, D., Jerjen, H., Milone, A. P., Mackey, D. & Da Costa, G. S. Discovery of a faint outer halo Milky Way star cluster in the southern sky. Astrophys. J. 803, 63 (2015).
Google Scholar
McConnachie, A. W. & Irwin, M. J. Structural properties of the M31 dwarf spheroidal galaxies. Mon. Not. R. Astron. Soc. 365, 1263–1276 (2006).
Google Scholar
McConnachie, A. W. The observed properties of dwarf galaxies in and around the Local Group. Astron. J. 144, 4 (2012).
Google Scholar
Makarova, L. N. et al. A nearby isolated dwarf: star formation and structure of ESO 006-001. Astrophys. J. 943, 139 (2023).
Google Scholar
Kirby, E. N., Bullock, J. S., Boylan-Kolchin, M., Kaplinghat, M. & Cohen, J. G. The dynamics of isolated Local Group galaxies. Mon. Not. R. Astron. Soc. 439, 1015–1027 (2014).
Google Scholar
Dalcanton, J. J. et al. The ACS Nearby Galaxy Survey Treasury. Astrophys. J. Suppl. Ser. 183, 67–108 (2009).
Google Scholar
Koribalski, B. S. et al. The 1000 brightest HIPASS galaxies: H I properties. Astron. J. 128, 16–46 (2004).
Google Scholar
Newman, M. J. B. et al. An empirical calibration of the tip of the red giant branch distance method in the near infrared. I. HST WFC3/IR F110W and F160W filters. Astrophys. J. 966, 175 (2024).
Google Scholar
Jones, M. G. et al. Pavo: discovery of a star-forming dwarf galaxy just outside the Local Group. Astrophys. J. Lett. 957, L5 (2023).
Google Scholar
Karachentsev, I. D. et al. A new galaxy near the Local Group in Draco. Astron. Astrophys. 379, 407–411 (2001).
Google Scholar
Higgs, C. R. et al. Solo dwarfs II: the stellar structure of isolated Local Group dwarf galaxies. Mon. Not. R. Astron. Soc. 503, 176–199 (2021).
Google Scholar
Kirby, E. N. et al. Chemistry and kinematics of the late-forming dwarf irregular galaxies Leo A, Aquarius, and Sagittarius DIG. Astrophys. J. 834, 9 (2017).
Google Scholar
McQuinn, K. B. W. et al. Pegasus W: an ultrafaint dwarf galaxy outside the halo of M31 not quenched by reionization. Astrophys. J. 944, 14 (2023).
Google Scholar
Bernstein-Cooper, E. Z. et al. ALFALFA discovery of the nearby gas-rich dwarf galaxy Leo P. V. neutral gas dynamics and kinematics. Astron. J. 148, 35 (2014).
Google Scholar
McQuinn, K. B. W. et al. Leo P: an unquenched very low-mass galaxy. Astrophys. J. 812, 158 (2015).
Google Scholar
Sand, D. J. et al. Tucana B: a potentially isolated and quenched ultra-faint dwarf galaxy at D ≈ 1.4 Mpc. Astrophys. J. Lett. 935, L17 (2022).
Google Scholar
Young, L. M., van Zee, L., Lo, K. Y., Dohm-Palmer, R. C. & Beierle, M. E. Star formation and the interstellar medium in four dwarf irregular galaxies. Astrophys. J. 592, 111–128 (2003).
Google Scholar
Hargis, J. R. et al. Hubble Space Telescope imaging of Antlia B: star formation history and a new tip of the red giant branch distance. Astrophys. J. 888, 31 (2020).
Google Scholar
Sand, D. J. et al. Antlia B: a faint dwarf galaxy member of the NGC 3109 association. Astrophys. J. Lett. 812, L13 (2015).
Google Scholar
Zoutendijk, S. L. et al. The MUSE-Faint survey. III. No large dark-matter cores and no significant tidal stripping in ultra-faint dwarf galaxies. Preprint https://arxiv.org/abs/2112.09374 (2021).
Tully, R. B. et al. The Extragalactic Distance Database. Astron. J. 138, 323–331 (2009).
Google Scholar
McQuinn, K. B. W. et al. Discovery and characterization of two ultrafaint dwarfs outside the halo of the Milky Way: Leo M and Leo K. Astrophys. J. 967, 161 (2024).
Google Scholar
Carlin, J. L. et al. Tidal destruction in a low-mass galaxy environment: the discovery of tidal tails around DDO 44. Astrophys. J. 886, 109 (2019).
Google Scholar
Battaglia, G., Rejkuba, M., Tolstoy, E., Irwin, M. J. & Beccari, G. A wide-area view of the Phoenix dwarf galaxy from Very Large Telescope/FORS imaging. Mon. Not. R. Astron. Soc. 424, 1113–1131 (2012).
Google Scholar
Kacharov, N. et al. Prolate rotation and metallicity gradient in the transforming dwarf galaxy Phoenix. Mon. Not. R. Astron. Soc. 466, 2006–2023 (2017).
Google Scholar
van de Rydt, F., Demers, S. & Kunkel, W. E. Phoenix: an intermediate dwarf galaxy in the Local Group. Astron. J. 102, 130–136 (1991).
Google Scholar
Bouchard, A., Jerjen, H., Da Costa, G. S. & Ott, J. Detection of neutral hydrogen in early-type dwarf galaxies of the Sculptor Group. Astron. J. 130, 2058–2064 (2005).
Google Scholar
Savino, A. et al. The Hubble Space Telescope Survey of M31 Satellite Galaxies. I. RR Lyrae-based distances and refined 3D geometric structure. Astrophys. J. 938, 101 (2022).
Google Scholar
McNanna, M. et al. A search for faint resolved galaxies beyond the Milky Way in DES Year 6: a new faint, diffuse dwarf satellite of NGC 55. Astrophys. J. 961, 126 (2024).
Google Scholar
Simon, J. D. & Geha, M. The kinematics of the ultra-faint Milky Way satellites: solving the missing satellite problem. Astrophys. J. 670, 313–331 (2007).
Google Scholar
Leaman, R. et al. The comparative chemical evolution of an isolated dwarf galaxy: a VLT and Keck spectroscopic survey of WLM. Astrophys. J. 767, 131 (2013).
Google Scholar
Taibi, S. et al. The Tucana dwarf spheroidal galaxy: not such a massive failure after all. Astron. Astrophys. 635, A152 (2020).
Google Scholar
Barnes, D. G. & de Blok, W. J. G. On the neutral gas content and environment of NGC 3109 and the Antlia dwarf galaxy. Astron. J. 122, 825–829 (2001).
Google Scholar
Hoffman, G. L. et al. Arecibo H i mapping of a large sample of dwarf irregular galaxies. Astrophys. J. Suppl. Ser. 105, 269–298 (1996).
Google Scholar
Karachentsev, I. D., Makarova, L. N., Tully, R. B., Wu, P.-F. & Kniazev, A. Y. KK258, a new transition dwarf galaxy neighbouring the Local Group. Mon. Not. R. Astron. Soc. 443, 1281–1290 (2014).
Google Scholar
Karachentsev, I. D., Makarova, L. N., Makarov, D. I., Tully, R. B. & Rizzi, L. A new isolated dSph galaxy near the Local Group. Mon. Not. R. Astron. Soc. 447, L85–L89 (2015).
Google Scholar
Karachentsev, I. D., Kniazev, A. Y. & Sharina, M. E. The isolated dSph galaxy KKs3 in the local Hubble flow. Astron. Nachr. 336, 707–714 (2015).
Google Scholar
Baumgardt, H. & Hilker, M. A catalogue of masses, structural parameters, and velocity dispersion profiles of 112 Milky Way globular clusters. Mon. Not. R. Astron. Soc. 478, 1520–1557 (2018).
Google Scholar
Baumgardt, H., Sollima, A. & Hilker, M. Absolute V-band magnitudes and mass-to-light ratios of Galactic globular clusters. Publ. Astron. Soc. Aust. 37, e046 (2020).
Google Scholar
Baumgardt, H. & Vasiliev, E. Accurate distances to Galactic globular clusters through a combination of Gaia EDR3, HST, and literature data. Mon. Not. R. Astron. Soc. 505, 5957–5977 (2021).
Google Scholar
Kunder, A. et al. The Milky Way Bulge extra-tidal star survey: BH 261 (AL 3). Astron. J. 167, 21 (2024).
Google Scholar
Simpson, J. D. The most metal-poor Galactic globular cluster: the first spectroscopic observations of ESO280-SC06. Mon. Not. R. Astron. Soc. 477, 4565–4576 (2018).
Google Scholar
Kobulnicky, H. A. et al. Discovery of a new low-latitude Milky Way globular cluster using GLIMPSE. Astron. J. 129, 239–250 (2005).
Google Scholar
Harris, W. E. A new catalog of globular clusters in the Milky Way. Preprint at https://arxiv.org/abs/1012.3224 (2010).
Kunder, A., Crabb, R. E., Debattista, V. P., Koch-Hansen, A. J. & Huhmann, B. M. Spectroscopic observations of obscured populations in the inner galaxy: 2MASS-GC02, Terzan 4, and the 200 km s−1 stellar peak. Astron. J. 162, 86 (2021).
Google Scholar
Pallanca, C. et al. Internal kinematics and structure of the bulge globular cluster NGC 6569. Astrophys. J. 950, 138 (2023).
Google Scholar
Souza, S. O. et al. Photo-chemo-dynamical analysis and the origin of the bulge globular cluster Palomar 6. Astron. Astrophys. 656, A78 (2021).
Google Scholar
Kurtev, R., Ivanov, V. D., Borissova, J. & Ortolani, S. Obscured clusters. II. GLIMPSE-C02 – a new metal rich globular cluster in the Milky Way. Astron. Astrophys. 489, 583–587 (2008).
Google Scholar
Strader, J. & Kobulnicky, H. A. A probable new globular cluster in the Galactic disk. Astron. J. 136, 2102–2106 (2008).
Google Scholar
Carraro, G., Zinn, R. & Bidin, C. M. Whiting 1: the youngest globular cluster associated with the Sagittarius dwarf spheroidal galaxy. Astron. Astrophys. 466, 181–189 (2007).
Google Scholar
Taylor, E. et al. EDGE: initial condition files. Zenodo https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.16536387 (2025).