Bohr, A. & Memarzadeh, K. in Artificial Intelligence in Healthcare (eds Bohr, A. & Memarzadeh, K.) 25–60 (Academic, 2020).
Dwyer, D. B., Falkai, P. & Koutsouleris, N. Machine learning approaches for clinical psychology and psychiatry. Annu. Rev. Clin. Psychol. 14, 91–118 (2018).
Google Scholar
Lattie, E. G., Stiles-Shields, C. & Graham, A. K. An overview of and recommendations for more accessible digital mental health services. Nat. Rev. Psychol. 1, 87–100 (2022).
Google Scholar
Torous, J. & Blease, C. Generative artificial intelligence in mental health care: potential benefits and current challenges. World Psychiatry 23, 1–2 (2024).
Google Scholar
Graham, S. et al. Artificial intelligence for mental health and mental illnesses: an overview. Curr. Psychiatry Rep. 21, 116 (2019).
Google Scholar
Habicht, J. et al. Closing the accessibility gap to mental health treatment with a personalized self-referral chatbot. Nat. Med. 30, 595–602 (2024).
Google Scholar
Jacobson, N. C. & Bhattacharya, S. Digital biomarkers of anxiety disorder symptom changes: Personalized deep learning models using smartphone sensors accurately predict anxiety symptoms from ecological momentary assessments. Behav. Res. Ther. 149, 104013 (2022).
Google Scholar
Johnson, A. E. et al. Utilizing artificial intelligence to enhance health equity among patients with heart failure. Heart Fail. Clin. 18, 259–273 (2022).
Google Scholar
Olawade, D. B. et al. Enhancing mental health with artificial intelligence: current trends and future prospects. J. Med. Surg. Public Health 3, 100099 (2024).
Google Scholar
Anderson-Lewis, C., Darville, G., Mercado, R. E., Howell, S. & Di Maggio, S. mHealth technology use and implications in historically underserved and minority populations in the United States: systematic literature review. JMIR mHealth uHealth 6, e8383 (2018).
Google Scholar
McGuire, T. G. & Miranda, J. New evidence regarding racial and ethnic disparities in mental health: policy implications. Health Aff. 27, 393–403 (2008).
Google Scholar
Belenguer, L. AI bias: exploring discriminatory algorithmic decision-making models and the application of possible machine-centric solutions adapted from the pharmaceutical industry. AI Ethics 2, 771–787 (2022).
Google Scholar
Chouldechova, A. & Roth, A. A group of industry, academic, and government experts convene in Philadelphia to explore the roots of algorithmic bias. Commun. ACM 63, 82–89 (2020).
Google Scholar
Fulmer, R., Davis, T., Costello, C. & Joerin, A. The ethics of psychological artificial intelligence: Clinical considerations. Couns. Values 66, 131–144 (2021).
Google Scholar
Timmons, A. C. et al. A call to action on assessing and mitigating bias in artificial intelligence applications for mental health. Persp. Psychol. Sci. 18, 1062–1096 (2023).
Google Scholar
Chen, F., Wang, L., Hong, J., Jiang, J. & Zhou, L. Unmasking bias in artificial intelligence: a systematic review of bias detection and mitigation strategies in electronic health record-based models. J. Am. Med. Inform. Assoc. 31, 1172–1183 (2024).
Google Scholar
Noor, P. Can we trust AI not to further embed racial bias and prejudice? BMJ 368, m363 (2020).
Google Scholar
Adler, D. A. et al. Measuring algorithmic bias to analyze the reliability of AI tools that predict depression risk using smartphone sensed-behavioral data. npj Ment. Health Res. 3, 17 (2024).
Google Scholar
Mizock, L. & Harkins, D. Diagnostic bias and conduct disorder: improving culturally sensitive diagnosis. Child. Youth Serv. 32, 243–253 (2011).
Google Scholar
Rajkomar, A., Hardt, M., Howell, M. D., Corrado, G. & Chin, M. H. Ensuring fairness in machine learning to advance health equity. Ann. Intern. Med. 169, 866–872 (2018).
Google Scholar
Cowgill, B. et al. Biased programmers? Or biased data? A field experiment in operationalizing AI ethics. In Proc. 21st ACM Conf. Economics and Computation 679–681 (ACM, 2020).
Obermeyer, Z., Powers, B., Vogeli, C. & Mullainathan, S. Dissecting racial bias in an algorithm used to manage the health of populations. Science 366, 447–453 (2019).
Google Scholar
Chen, R. J. et al. Algorithmic fairness in artificial intelligence for medicine and healthcare. Nat. Biomed. Eng. 7, 719–742 (2023).
Google Scholar
Mehrabi, N., Morstatter, F., Saxena, N., Lerman, K. & Galstyan, A. A survey on bias and fairness in machine learning. ACM Comput. Surv. 54, 115 (2021).
Pagano, T. P. et al. Bias and unfairness in machine learning models: a systematic review on datasets, tools, fairness metrics, and identification and mitigation methods. Big Data Cogn. Comput. 7, 15 (2023).
Google Scholar
Kamishima, T., Akaho, S., Asoh, H. & Sakuma, J. Model-based and actual independence for fairness-aware classification. Data Min. Knowl. Discov. 32, 258–286 (2018).
Google Scholar
Nilsen, P. et al. Accelerating the impact of artificial intelligence in mental healthcare through implementation science. Implement. Res. Pract. 3, 26334895221112033 (2022).
Google Scholar
Nazer, L. H. et al. Bias in artificial intelligence algorithms and recommendations for mitigation. PLoS Digit. Health 2, e0000278 (2023).
Google Scholar
O’Brien, J., Fossey, E. & Palmer, V. J. A scoping review of the use of co-design methods with culturally and linguistically diverse communities to improve or adapt mental health services. Health Soc. Care Comm. 29, 1–17 (2021).
Google Scholar
Brotherdale, R., Berry, K., Branitsky, A. & Bucci, S. Co-producing digital mental health interventions: a systematic review. Digit. Health https://doi.org/10.1177/20552076241239172 (2024).
Halvorsrud, K. et al. Identifying evidence of effectiveness in the co-creation of research: a systematic review and meta-analysis of the international healthcare literature. J. Publ. Health 43, 197–208 (2021).
Google Scholar
Åkerblom, K. B. & Ness, O. Peer workers in co-production and co-creation in mental health and substance use services: a scoping review. Adm. Policy Ment. Health 50, 296–316 (2023).
Google Scholar
Elwan, M. Co-creation and recovery in mental health services: a lived experience perspective. Ir. J. Psychol. Med. 7, 1–3 (2024).
Google Scholar
Kuipers, S. J., Cramm, J. M. & Nieboer, A. P. The importance of patient-centered care and co-creation of care for satisfaction with care and physical and social well-being of patients with multi-morbidity in the primary care setting. BMC Health Serv. Res. 19, 13 (2019).
Google Scholar
Powell, N., Dalton, H., Lawrence-Bourne, J. & Perkins, D. Co-creating community wellbeing initiatives: what is the evidence and how do they work? Int. J. Ment. Health Syst. 18, 28 (2024).
Google Scholar
Soklaridis, S. et al. A balancing act: navigating the nuances of co-production in mental health research. Res. Inv. Engag. 10, 30 (2024).
Google Scholar
Mulvale, G. et al. Co-creating a new charter for equitable and inclusive co-creation: insights from an international forum of academic and lived experience experts. BMJ Open 14, e078950 (2024).
Google Scholar
Sliep, Y., Tankink, M. & Bubenzer, F. Co-creation as a methodology to integrate mental health and psychosocial support and peacebuilding. Interv. J. Ment. Health Psychosoc. Support Conflict-Affected Areas 21, 89–95 (2023).
Google Scholar
Uricchio, W. & Cizek, K. Co-creating with AI. Minn. Rev. 2023, 118–131 (2023).
Google Scholar
McCaffrey, L. et al. Adult co-creators’ emotional and psychological experiences of the co-creation process: a Health CASCADE scoping review protocol. Syst. Rev. 13, 231 (2024).
Google Scholar
Israilov, S. & Cho, H. J. How co-creation helped address hierarchy, overwhelmed patients, and conflicts of interest in health care quality and safety. AMA J. Ethics 19, 1139–1145 (2017).
Google Scholar
Laurisz, N., Ćwiklicki, M., Żabiński, M., Canestrino, R. & Magliocca, P. Co-creation in health 4.0 as a new solution for a new era. Healthcare 11, 363 (2023).
Google Scholar
Tuhiwai Smith, L. Decolonizing Methodologies: Research And Indigenous Peoples (Bloomsbury, 2012).
Fadus, M. C. et al. Unconscious bias and the diagnosis of disruptive behavior disorders and ADHD in African American and Hispanic youth. Acad. Psychiatry 44, 95–102 (2020).
Google Scholar
Topol, E. J. Welcoming new guidelines for AI clinical research. Nat. Med. 26, 1318–1320 (2020).
Google Scholar
Yang, J., Soltan, A. A. S., Eyre, D. W., Yang, Y. & Clifton, D. A. An adversarial training framework for mitigating algorithmic biases in clinical machine learning. npj Digit. Med. 6, 55 (2023).
Google Scholar
Berk, R., Heidari, H., Jabbari, S., Kearns, M. & Roth, A. Fairness in criminal justice risk assessments: the state of the art. Sociol. Meth. Res. 50, 3–44 (2021).
Google Scholar
Alvarez, J. M. et al. Policy advice and best practices on bias and fairness in AI. Ethics Inf. Technol. 26, 31 (2024).
Google Scholar
Ferrara, E. Fairness and bias in artificial intelligence: a brief survey of sources, impacts, and mitigation strategies. Sci. 6, 3 (2024).
Google Scholar
Ferrara, C., Sellitto, G., Ferrucci, F., Palomba, F. & De Lucia, A. Fairness-aware machine learning engineering: how far are we? Emp. Softw. Eng. 29, 9 (2024).
Google Scholar
Vucinich, S. & Zhu, Q. The current state and challenges of fairness in federated learning. IEEE Access 11, 80903–80914 (2023).
Google Scholar
Liu, M., Meng, Q., Yu, G. & Zhang, Z.-H. Fairness as a robust utilitarianism. Prod. Op. Manag. 34, 563–574 (2025).
Google Scholar
Wenar, L. in The Stanford Encyclopedia of Philosophy (ed. Zalta, E. N.) (Metaphysics Research Lab, Stanford University, 2021).
Bevan Jones, R. et al. Practitioner review: co-design of digital mental health technologies with children and young people. J. Child. Psychol. Psychiatry 61, 928–940 (2020).
Google Scholar
Dugstad, J., Eide, T., Nilsen, E. R. & Eide, H. Towards successful digital transformation through co-creation: a longitudinal study of a four-year implementation of digital monitoring technology in residential care for persons with dementia. BMC Health Serv. Res. 19, 366 (2019).
Google Scholar
Grindell, C., Coates, E., Croot, L. & O’Cathain, A. The use of co-production, co-design and co-creation to mobilise knowledge in the management of health conditions: a systematic review. BMC Health Serv. Res. 22, 877 (2022).
Google Scholar
Ito-Jaeger, S., Perez Vallejos, E., Logathasan, S., Curran, T. & Crawford, P. Young people’s trust in cocreated web-based resources to promote mental health literacy: focus group study. JMIR Ment. Health 10, e38346 (2023).
Google Scholar
Porche, M. V., Folk, J. B., Tolou-Shams, M. & Fortuna, L. R. Researchers’ perspectives on digital mental health intervention co-design with marginalized community stakeholder youth and families. Front. Psychiatry 13, 867460 (2022).
Google Scholar
Schneider, M. L. et al. Individual and organizational outcomes of engaging peers in the cocreation of digital mental health interventions. Psychol. Serv. https://doi.org/10.1037/ser0000889 (2024).
Thabrew, H., Fleming, T., Hetrick, S. & Merry, S. Co-design of eHealth interventions with children and young people. Front. Psychiatry 9, 481 (2018).
Google Scholar
Batalden, M. et al. Coproduction of healthcare service. BMJ Qual. Saf. 25, 509–517 (2016).
Google Scholar
Fusco, F., Marsilio, M. & Guglielmetti, C. Co-creation in healthcare: framing the outcomes and their determinants. J. Serv. Manag. 34, 1–26 (2023).
Google Scholar
Norton, M. J. Coproduction and mental health service provision: a protocol for a scoping review. BMJ Open 12, e058428 (2022).
Google Scholar
Braun, V. & Clarke, V. Using thematic analysis in psychology. Qual. Res. Psychol. 3, 77–101 (2006).
Google Scholar
Duara, R., Chowdhury, D., Dey, R., Goswami, S. & Madill, A. Using cocreated visually informed community mental health education in low- and middle-income countries: a case study of youth substance misuse in Assam, India. Health Expect. 25, 1930–1944 (2022).
Google Scholar
Bruen, C., Brugha, R., Kageni, A. & Wafula, F. A concept in flux: questioning accountability in the context of global health cooperation. Glob. Health 10, 73 (2014).
Google Scholar
Greenhalgh, T., Jackson, C., Shaw, S. & Janamian, T. Achieving research impact through co-creation in community-based health services: literature review and case study. Milbank Q. 94, 392–429 (2016).
Google Scholar
Perna, A., O’Toole, T., Baraldi, E. & Gregori, G. L. The value co-creation journey: a longitudinal process unfolding in a network through collaboration. J. Bus. Ind. Mark. 37, 182–196 (2022).
Google Scholar
Zicari, R. V. et al. Co-design of a trustworthy AI system in healthcare: deep learning based skin lesion classifier. Front. Hum. Dyn. 3, 688152 (2021).
Google Scholar
Crotty, M. J. The Foundations of Social Research: Meaning and Perspective in the Research Process (Sage, 1998).
Phillips, D. C. & Burbules, N. C. Postpositivism and Educational Research (Bloomsbury, 2000).
Lincoln, Y. S. & Guba, E. G. Naturalistic Inquiry (Sage, 1985).
Schwandt, T. A. in Handbook of Qualitative Research (eds Denzin, N. K. & Lincoln, Y. S.) 189–213 (Sage, 2000).
Kincheloe, J. L. & Mclaren, P. in Key Works in Critical Pedagogy (eds Hayes, K., Steinberg, S. R. & Tobin, K.) 285–326 (SensePublishers, 2011).
Veldmeijer, L. et al. Design for mental health: can design promote human-centred diagnostics? Des. Health 7, 5–23 (2023).
Heron, J. & Reason, P. A participatory inquiry paradigm. Qual. Inq. 3, 274–294 (1997).
Google Scholar
Denzin, N. K. & Lincoln, Y. S. (eds) The SAGE Handbook of Qualitative Research (Sage, 2017).
Buda, T. S. et al. Foundations for fairness in digital health apps. Front. Digital Health 4, 943514 (2022).
Google Scholar
Morgan, P. & Cogan, N. A. Using artificial intelligence to address mental health inequalities: co-creating machine learning algorithms with key stakeholders and citizen engagement. J. Public. Ment. Health https://doi.org/10.1108/JPMH-07-2024-0095 (2024).
Yang, J. et al. Mitigating machine learning bias between high income and low–middle income countries for enhanced model fairness and generalizability. Sci. Rep. 14, 13318 (2024).
Google Scholar
Konttila, J., Korkiakoski, V., Kurikka, J., Pääkkönen, J. & Kyngäs, H. Co-creation: an approach to developing digitalized mental healthcare. Psych. Fenn. 52, 138–146 (2021).
Kohlgrüber, M., Maldonado-Mariscal, K. & Schröder, A. Mutual learning in innovation and co-creation processes: integrating technological and social innovation. Front. Educ. 6, 498661 (2021).
Google Scholar
Hardt, M., Price, E., Price, E. & Srebro, N. Equality of opportunity in supervised learning. In Advances in Neural Information Processing Systems (eds Lee, D. et al.) Vol. 29, 3323–3331 (Curran Associates, 2016).
Brewer, L. C. et al. Fostering African-American improvement in total health (FAITH!): an application of the American Heart Association’s life’s simple 7TM among midwestern African-Americans. J. Racial Ethn. Health Disparities 4, 269–281 (2017).
Google Scholar
Gupta, M., Gao, J., Aggarwal, C. C. & Han, J. Outlier detection for temporal data: a survey. IEEE Trans. Knowl. Data Eng. 26, 2250–2267 (2014).
Google Scholar
Widmer, G. & Kubat, M. Learning in the presence of concept drift and hidden contexts. Mach. Learn. 23, 69–101 (1996).
Google Scholar
Guan, H., Bates, D. & Zhou, L. Keeping medical AI healthy: a review of detection and correction methods for system degradation. Preprint at https://doi.org/10.48550/arXiv.2506.17442 (2025).
Gianfrancesco, M. A., Tamang, S., Yazdany, J. & Schmajuk, G. Potential biases in machine learning algorithms using electronic health record data. JAMA Intern. Med. 178, 1544–1547 (2018).
Google Scholar
Alqahtani, F., Winn, A. & Orji, R. Co-designing a mobile app to improve mental health and well-being: focus group study. JMIR Form. Res. 5, e18172 (2021).
Google Scholar
Sarri, G., Forsythe, A., Elvidge, J. & Dawoud, D. Living health technology assessments: how close to living reality? BMJ Evidence-based Med. 28, 369–371 (2023).
Google Scholar
Ni, Y. & Jia, F. A scoping review of AI-driven digital interventions in mental health care: mapping applications across screening, support, monitoring, prevention, and clinical education. Healthcare 13, 1205 (2025).
Google Scholar
Nahum-Shani, I. et al. Just-in-time adaptive interventions (JITAIs) in mobile health: key components and design principles for ongoing health behavior support. Ann. Behav. Med. 52, 446–462 (2018).
Google Scholar
Almirall, D., Nahum-Shani, I., Sherwood, N. E. & Murphy, S. A. Introduction to SMART designs for the development of adaptive interventions: with application to weight loss research. Transl. Behav. Med. 4, 260–274 (2014).
Google Scholar
Carpenter, S. M., Menictas, M., Nahum-Shani, I., Wetter, D. W. & Murphy, S. A. Developments in mobile health just-in-time adaptive interventions for addiction science. Curr. Addict. Rep. 7, 280–290 (2020).
Google Scholar
Hardeman, W., Houghton, J., Lane, K., Jones, A. & Naughton, F. A systematic review of just-in-time adaptive interventions (JITAIs) to promote physical activity. Int. J. Behav. Nutr. Phys. Act. 16, 31 (2019).
Google Scholar
Kidwell, K. M. & Almirall, D. Sequential, multiple assignment, randomized trial designs. JAMA 329, 336–337 (2023).
Google Scholar
Juarascio, A. S. et al. Just-in-time adaptive interventions: a novel approach for enhancing skill utilization and acquisition in cognitive behavioral therapy for eating disorders. Int. J. Eat. Disord. 51, 826–830 (2018).
Google Scholar
Lorenzoni, G. et al. Use of sequential multiple assignment randomized trials (SMARTs) in oncology: systematic review of published studies. Br. J. Cancer 128, 1177–1188 (2023).
Google Scholar
Nahum-Shani, I. et al. Just-in-time adaptive interventions (JITAIs) in mobile health: key components and design principles for ongoing health behavior support. Ann. Behav. Med. 52, 446–462 (2016).
Google Scholar
Perski, O. et al. Technology-mediated just-in-time adaptive interventions (JITAIs) to reduce harmful substance use: a systematic review. Addiction 117, 1220–1241 (2022).
Google Scholar
Wang, L. & Miller, L. C. Just-in-the-moment adaptive interventions (JITAI): a meta-analytical review. Health Commun. 35, 1531–1544 (2020).
Google Scholar
Glaz, A. L. et al. Machine learning and natural language processing in mental health: systematic review. J. Med. Internet Res. 23, e15708 (2021).
Google Scholar
van der Wal, O. et al. Undesirable biases in NLP: addressing challenges of measurement. J. Artif. Intell. Res. 79, 1–40 (2024).
Google Scholar
Demszky, D. et al. Using large language models in psychology. Nat. Rev. Psychol. 2, 688–701 (2023).
Huerta, E. A. et al. FAIR for AI: an interdisciplinary and international community building perspective. Sci. Data 10, 487 (2023).
Google Scholar
Rubeis, G. iHealth: the ethics of artificial intelligence and big data in mental healthcare. Internet Interv. 28, 100518 (2022).
Google Scholar
Bajorek, J. P. Voice recognition still has significant race and gender biases. Harvard Business Review https://hbr.org/2019/05/voice-recognition-still-has-significant-race-and-gender-biases (10 May 2019).
Koenecke, A. et al. Racial disparities in automated speech recognition. Proc. Natl Acad. Sci. 117, 7684–7689 (2020).
Google Scholar
Schueller, S. M., Hunter, J. F., Figueroa, C. & Aguilera, A. Use of digital mental health for marginalized and underserved populations. Curr. Treat. Options Psychiatry 6, 243–255 (2019).
Google Scholar
Grother, P., Ngan, M. & Hanaoka, K. Face Recognition Vendor Test (FVRT): Part 3, Demographic Effects (National Institute of Standards and Technology, 2019).
Milintsevich, K., Sirts, K. & Dias, G. Your model is not predicting depression well and that is why: a case study of PRIMATE dataset. Preprint at https://doi.org/10.48550/arXiv.2403.00438 (2024).
Aikens, R. C., Chen, J. H., Baiocchi, M. & Simard, J. F. Feedback loop failure modes in medical diagnosis: how biases can emerge and be reinforced. Med. Decis. Mak. 44, 481–496 (2024).
Google Scholar
Chawla, N. V., Bowyer, K. W., Hall, L. O. & Kegelmeyer, W. P. SMOTE: synthetic minority over-sampling technique. J. Artif. Intell. Res. 16, 321–357 (2002).
Google Scholar
Kamiran, F. & Calders, T. Data preprocessing techniques for classification without discrimination. Knowl. Inf. Syst. 33, 1–33 (2012).
Google Scholar
Fajemisin, A. O., Maragno, D. & den Hertog, D. Optimization with constraint learning: a framework and survey. Eur. J. Oper. Res. 314, 1–14 (2024).
Google Scholar
Pleiss, G., Raghavan, M., Wu, F., Kleinberg, J. & Weinberger, K. Q. On fairness and calibration. Adv. Neural Inf. Process. Syst. 31, 5684–5693 (2017).
Gao, R. & Shah, C. Toward creating a fairer ranking in search engine results. Inf. Process. Manag. 57, 102138 (2020).
Google Scholar
Raghavan, M. The Societal Impacts of Algorithmic Decision-Making (ACM, 2023).
Kehrenberg, T., Chen, Z. & Quadrianto, N. Tuning fairness by balancing target labels. Front. Artif. Intell. 3, 33 (2020).
Google Scholar
Zhu, D., Al Mahmud, A. & Liu, W. Design requirements for a digital storytelling application for people with mild cognitive impairment (MCI). Digit. Health 10, 20552076241282237 (2024).
Google Scholar
Hsu, Y.-C., Verma, H., Mauri, A., Nourbakhsh, I. & Bozzon, A. Empowering local communities using artificial intelligence. Patterns 3, 100449 (2022).
Google Scholar
Pomeroy–Stevens, A., Goldman, B. & Grattan, K. Participatory systems mapping for municipal prioritization and planning. J. Urban. Health 99, 738–748 (2022).
Google Scholar
Chan, S. et al. Co-designing generative AI technologies with older adults to support daily tasks. An MIT Exploration of Generative AI https://doi.org/10.21428/e4baedd9.4f2a95fc (2024).
Chang, W.-L. & Shao, Y.-C. Co-creating User Journey Map — a systematic approach to exploring users’ day-to-day experience in participatory design workshops. In Proc. Human–Computer Interaction (eds Kurosu, M. & Hashizume, A.) https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-031-35596-7_1 (Springer Nature, 2023).
Listiyandini, R. A. et al. Culturally adapting an internet-delivered mindfulness intervention for Indonesian university students experiencing psychological distress: mixed methods study. JMIR Form. Res. 7, e47126 (2023).
Google Scholar
Xie, Y., Chen, M., Kao, D., Gao, G. & Chen, X. A. CheXplain: enabling physicians to explore and understand data-driven, AI-enabled medical imaging analysis. In Proc. 2020 CHI Conf. Human Factors in Computing Systems (eds Bernhaupt, R. et al.) https://doi.org/10.1145/3313831.3376807 (ACM, 2020).
Cheng, H.-F. et al. Soliciting stakeholders’ fairness notions in child maltreatment predictive systems. In Proc. 2021 CHI Conf. Human Factors in Computing Systems (eds Kitamura, Y. et al.) 390 (ACM, 2021).
Bergman, S. et al. STELA: a community-centred approach to norm elicitation for AI alignment. Sci. Rep. 14, 6616 (2024).
Google Scholar
Benda, N. et al. Patient perspectives on AI for mental health care: cross-sectional survey study. JMIR Ment. Health 11, e58462 (2024).
Google Scholar
Suh, J. et al. Toward tailoring just-in-time adaptive intervention systems for workplace stress reduction: exploratory analysis of intervention implementation. JMIR Ment. Health 11, e48974 (2024).
Google Scholar
Orzikulova, A. et al. Time2Stop: adaptive and explainable human–AI loop for smartphone overuse intervention. In Proc. CHI Conf. Human Factors in Computing Systems (Mueller, F. F. et al.) 250 (ACM, 2024).
Ospina-Pinillos, L. et al. Co-designing, developing, and testing a mental health platform for young people using a participatory design methodology in Colombia: mixed methods study. JMIR Hum. Factors 12, e66558 (2025).
Google Scholar
Bødker, S., Ehn, P., Sjögren, D. & Sundblad, Y. Co-operative design — perspectives on 20 years with ‘the Scandinavian IT Design Model’. Proc. NordiCHI 2000, 22–24 (2000).
Ehn, P. Work-Oriented Design of Computer Artifacts (Arbetslivscentrum, 1988).
Brown, T. Change by Design: How Design Thinking Transforms Organizations and Inspires Innovation (Harper Business, 2019).
Norman, D. A. The Design of Everyday Things (MIT Press, 2013).
Bate, P. & Robert, G. Bringing User Experience to Healthcare Improvement: the Concepts, Methods and Practices of Experience-Based Design (CRC Press, 2023).
Sanders, E. B.-N. & Stappers, P. J. Co-creation and the new landscapes of design. CoDesign 4, 5–18 (2008).
Google Scholar
Loeffler, E., Power, G., Bovaird, T. & Hine-Hughes, F. Co-production of Health and Wellbeing in Scotland (Governance International, 2013).
Ostrom, E. Crossing the great divide: coproduction, synergy, and development. World Dev. 24, 1073–1087 (1996).
Google Scholar
Wallerstein, N. & Duran, B. Community-based participatory research contributions to intervention research: the intersection of science and practice to improve health equity. Am. J. Publ. Health 100, S40–S46 (2010).
Google Scholar
Colliga Apps Corp. A just-in-time adaptive intervention for child and family mental health. clinicaltrials.gov https://clinicaltrials.gov/study/NCT06443918 (2024).