Taking a bold and much-needed move to sanitise its virtual world, YouTube has officially declared a huge change in its monetisation policy from July 15, 2025. The change is not a rebranding of the site but a strong reset to its core principles: originality, creativity, and authenticity.
At the centre of the update is a more rigorous enforcement against “inauthentic content” — a catch-all phrase for videos that are produced on a mass scale, repetitive, or simply low-quality. And nowhere is the shift more impactful than in India, where YouTube has become a cultural phenomenon, a business hub, and a storytelling community for millions.
India is YouTube’s biggest user market with more than 500 million daily users consuming content in over 20+ Indian languages. It is a nation where a teenager from a Tier-2 town can overnight become a national phenomenon and where YouTube is frequently the gateway to economic independence and personal stardom. But this same accessibility has not been without a price.
Also Read: What does YouTube’s latest monetisation update mean for content creators?
The ease of entry resulted in a digital gold rush, where an infinite number of creators, bots, and opportunists flooded the platform with low-quality content for the sole purpose of views and ad money. Indian viewers are often exposed to AI-voiceover videos reciting Wikipedia articles, roundups of viral clips with sensationalist titles, and production-line reaction videos that lack intellectual or emotional contribution.
The new monetisation policy is set to reverse all that. Channels are still required to hit the minimum eligibility levels — 1,000 subscribers and either 4,000 public watch hours within the last 12 months or 10 million Shorts views within the last 90 days — but from now on, hitting those numbers no longer necessarily means the green light is on for monetisation.
A human review team will now strictly vet whether a creator’s content is authentic and original. In an environment such as India, where thousands of new channels appear on YouTube daily, this human gatekeeping may prove to be a watershed event. It is a powerful message: effort and imagination are valuable once more.
It is both a challenge and a possibility for Indian creators. The policy specifically calls out what will no longer be accepted — mass-generated content from automated software, monotonous styles with no added value, and low-effort algorithm-gaming spam videos made only to trick the system. This means the thousands of faceless “fact channels” repeating the same stories in robotic voices, spiritual and astrology videos with generic visuals and AI narration, and many so-called “motivational” shorts that are themselves plagiarised from others.
But the policy does not ban AI entirely. Indeed, it draws a crucial line. AI-generated content is fine, provided that the human author is clearly engaged in bringing value — via commentary, storytelling, analysis, or editing.
Also Read: A career in Fashion Communication, the new language of fashion
A thoughtfully researched explainer video utilising AI technology to script and animate but grounded in a human voice with original insights stays within the rule book. This provides opportunities for numerous Indian creators employed in local languages, who might not have costly production equipment but possess rich cultural insights and creative ideas.
The direct impact of this policy is likely to be a demonetisation wave. Numerous Indian channels that were established solely using stock footage, AI voices, and recycling of trending topics might have their advertisement revenue wiped out overnight.
Though a few will cry foul, this will probably give room to breathe for genuinely creative voices overwhelmed by algorithm-following spam. A Kozhikode comic artist, an indie musician from Shillong, or a Patna-based political commentator might now better be able to connect with their audience, free from competing with mass-uploaded garbage content.
Most importantly, the policy enforces the idea of “transformative” content. In India, where reaction videos, remix compilations, and dubbed film scenes rule a tremendous amount of views, this shift will compel creators to think more critically about what they’re providing. Are they providing context? Commentary? Humor? Insight? Or are they simply coasting on someone else’s intellectual labour? This shift is in line with the very concept of content as expression — not duplication.
The stakes for advertisers and brands in India are also high. As advertisers move increasingly away from mainstream media and invest heavily in online platforms, they have become cautious about partnering with spammy or deceptive content.
With YouTube’s renewed emphasis on quality, advertisers can feel more assured of the platform’s integrity, knowing that their ads are being shown against reliable and entertaining videos. This would indirectly help Indian content creators who invest in quality content, resulting in improved CPM (Cost Per Mille: a metric that represents the cost an advertiser pays for one thousand views or impressions of an advertisement) rates, sponsorships, and brand partnerships.
This latest monetisation format also introduces a psychological change in viewers. Indian viewers are emotional and smart; they can instantly detect authenticity — or the absence of it.
Years of frustration from users with deceptive thumbnails, auto-tuned narration, and channels producing five videos a day with nothing to say have led to this tightening of policies. Maybe a cleaner feed, more accurate recommendations, and greater user trust will be the result. Either way, the viewing experience is enhanced when the platform is not filled with content designed for machines and not human brains.
The YouTube policy update will also impact India’s thriving regional content ecosystem. As internet penetration in rural India increases and affordable data plans continue to be the norm, an increasing number of users in non-metro cities are consuming and producing content in Bhojpuri, Kannada, Tamil, Marathi, and Malayalam languages. These platforms have also become breeding grounds for low-effort content — videos based on sensationalism, misinformation, or cut-and-paste entertainment.
A more rigorous monetisation filter can contribute towards a higher regional content ecosystem where local creators such as storytellers, comedians, teachers, and artists get better visibility for their fresh takes on the digital space.
In addition, for Indian educational creators — those describing NEET exam tactics, talking about Hindi-language government policies, or instructing programming in Tamil — the policy might be a godsend. Such creators frequently toil in obscurity even as their high-value, high-effort content goes unnoticed.
If the algorithm will de-emphasise “AI slop” and spam, then a teacher at an Indore secondary school or a retired instructor from Trivandrum may at last receive recognition for his or her efforts.
But with this change, there are growing pains. There are thousands of would-be Indian creators that might feel deterred by the increased scrutiny. Others will not be aware of what is “transformative” or “original” content, particularly if they are new.
In these situations, proper communication and education from YouTube will come into play. Tutorials, regional content guidelines, and creator workshops would help a lot to make sure good creators are not penalised based on confusion or inaccessibility.
Subjectivity in human reviews is also a concern. What one reviewer considers low-effort, another may see as valuable content. Regional content styles and cultural nuances can be misinterpreted if there isn’t diversity in the review process.
YouTube India has to make sure its content reviewers are attuned to India’s broad culture range, recognising that a Bhojpuri poem read over rural imagery isn’t necessarily “low-effort,” and that a Tamil parody loses none of its ingenuity because it copies a Bollywood trend.
But for all these worries, the overall trend is promising. With this new policy, YouTube is in effect reaffirming its devotion to being a people’s platform, not an uploads-only platform. It is resisting the industrialisation of content and re-asserting the importance of human creativity in a digital world that is increasingly controlled by machines.
And for India, a nation whose people run stories through their veins, this is the start of a creative revival.
In the long run, the policy has the potential to unlock a fresh generation of unique voices from all over the Indian subcontinent. Reporters might begin YouTube channels in local dialects to analyse regional politics.
Young directors might post experimental shorts that combine AI animation with folktales. Social reformers and teachers might discover a more attentive crowd. Stand-up comedians would be given the spotlight they rightfully deserve without using gimmicks. And young women from traditional families might have safer, more dignified platforms to speak through, free of the debris and mess of exploitative content.
As YouTube draws its focus towards authenticity, Indian creators stand at a turning point. The age of content mills is over. The age of careful, audacious, value-based storytelling is upon us. And with the world as an audience, India’s future digital storytellers are being summoned not only to entertain but to take the platform — and maybe even the culture itself — to a higher level.