‘Adventurous’ vs ‘homebody’ anemonefish – research reveals key influences in diversification and evolution

video: 

Fish swimming in tank


view more 

Credit: Manon Mercader

Research Summary

This work aimed to understand how anemonefish — the colorful reef dwellers best known from Finding Nemo — evolved into such a diverse group of species. Scientists have long assumed that their tight-knit relationship with sea anemones, their protective hosts, was the main engine behind their evolutionary diversification. But the team wondered if other ecological factors could also have played a critical role. This question matters because anemonefish are one of the few examples of adaptive radiation in marine environments — where species rapidly diversify to fill ecological roles. Understanding how this happened can teach us how biodiversity forms and is maintained, especially under changing environmental pressures.

Research significance

The study challenges long-held ideas about what drives species diversification, revealing that the story of anemonefish evolution is much more complex than host specialization alone. The team shows that distinct ecological lifestyles — such as how much a fish ventures away from its anemone or how efficiently it swims — also shaped how different species evolved. This matters because it underscores how fine-scale behaviors and physiological traits influence biodiversity. In a time of rapid environmental change, understanding these hidden dimensions of animal adaptation helps us better predict which species may be more resilient or vulnerable. The work also positions anemonefish as a new model system for studying how ecological and evolutionary forces interact — with future research potentially revealing how behavior, physiology, and even personality influence species’ survival and coexistence. 

Conclusions

The researchers discovered that anemonefish have evolved into distinct “eco-morphotypes” — functionally different types that vary in how much they rely on their host and how well they swim. Surprisingly, these differences are not linked to the number of host species a fish uses (host specificity), as traditionally thought. Instead, they found that swimming efficiency, muscle architecture, and behavior better explain their ecological strategies. Some species are “adventurers” that roam widely with powerful muscles and low energy costs, while others are “homebodies” that stay close to their anemone, have smaller muscles, and use more energy to swim. This fine-tuned diversification likely played a key role in the adaptive radiation of anemonefish — and highlights the importance of traits we often overlook when thinking about evolution.

Methods

In the wild, the researchers filmed fish around their anemone hosts to measure how much time they spent inside or outside the host. In the lab, they used swim tunnels to test their endurance and oxygen use — like putting them on tiny fish treadmills. They also used 3D imaging and computer simulations to examine muscle anatomy and hydrodynamics, revealing how body shape affects swimming performance.

Example imagery from this project

The variety of techniques used in this research means a wealth of imagery available for journalists. These include images and videos of anemonefish in their natural habitat, as well as video swimming in the lab and the output of computational fluid dynamics simulations.


Disclaimer: AAAS and EurekAlert! are not responsible for the accuracy of news releases posted to EurekAlert! by contributing institutions or for the use of any information through the EurekAlert system.

Continue Reading