Acceptance of telemedicine among care personnel in inpatient and outpatient elderly care: a systematic review | BMC Geriatrics

Dall TM, Gallo PD, Chakrabarti R, West T, Semilla AP, Storm MV. An aging population and growing disease burden will require a large and specialized health care workforce by 2025. Health Aff (Millwood). 2013;32(11):2013–20.

Google Scholar 

Schaeffer D, Hämel K. Kooperative Versorgungsmodelle. Eine international vergleichende betrachtung. In: Jungbauer-Gans M, Kriwy P, editors. Handbuch gesundheitssoziologie. Wiesbaden: Springer Fachmedien Wiesbaden; 2017. pp. 1–18.

Google Scholar 

Needleman J, Buerhaus P, Pankratz VS, Leibson CL, Stevens SR, Harris M. Nurse staffing and inpatient hospital mortality. N Engl J Med. 2011;364(11):1037–45.

Google Scholar 

Lang TA, Hodge M, Olson V, Romano PS, Kravitz RL. Nurse-patient ratios: a systematic review on the effects of nurse staffing on patient, nurse employee, and hospital outcomes. J Nurs Adm. 2004;34(7–8):326–37.

Google Scholar 

Pickard L. A growing care gap? The supply of unpaid care for older people by their adult children in England to 2032. Aging Soc. 2015;35(1):96–123.

Google Scholar 

Ehrlich H, McKenney M, Elkbuli A. The need for actions to protect our geriatrics and maintain proper care at U.S. Long-Term care facilities. J Trauma Nurs. 2020;27(4):193–4.

Google Scholar 

Pruszyński J, Cianciara D, Pruszyńska I, Włodarczyk-Pruszyńska I. Staff shortages and inappropriate work conditions as a challenge geriatrics and contemporary healthcare service at large faces. J Educ Health Sport. 2022;12(7):136–47.

Google Scholar 

Brivio P, Paladini MS, Racagni G, Riva MA, Calabrese F, Molteni R. From healthy aging to frailty: in search of the underlying mechanisms. Curr Med Chem. 2019;26(20):3685–701.

Google Scholar 

Bierman AS, Tinetti ME. Precision medicine to precision care: managing Multimorbidity. Lancet. 2016;388(10061):2721–3.

Google Scholar 

Landi F, Liperoti R, Russo A, Capoluongo E, Barillaro C, Pahor M, et al. Disability, more than multimorbidity, was predictive of mortality among older persons aged 80 years and older. J Clin Epidemiol. 2010;63(7):752–9.

Google Scholar 

Ouslander JG, Berenson RA. Reducing unnecessary hospitalizations of nursing home residents. N Engl J Med. 2011;365(13):1165–7.

Google Scholar 

Marcantonio ER. Delirium in hospitalized older adults. N Engl J Med. 2017;377(15):1456–66.

Google Scholar 

Field MJ, Committee on Evaluating. Telemedicine: Telemedicine: A Guide to Assessing Telecommunications for Health Care. Washington, D.C.: National Academy Press; 1996. Available from: URL: http://gbv.eblib.com/patron/FullRecord.aspx?p=3377053.

Harst L, Lantzsch H, Scheibe M. Theories predicting End-User acceptance of telemedicine use: systematic review. J Med Internet Res. 2019;21(5):e13117.

Google Scholar 

Sood S, Mbarika V, Jugoo S, Dookhy R, Doarn CR, Prakash N, et al. What is telemedicine? A collection of 104 peer-reviewed perspectives and theoretical underpinnings. Telemed J E Health. 2007;13(5):573–90.

Google Scholar 

Chen W, Flanagan A, Nippak PM, Nicin M, Sinha SK. Understanding the experience of geriatric care professionals in using telemedicine to care for older patients in response to the COVID-19 pandemic: mixed methods study. JMIR Aging. 2022;5(3):e34952.

Google Scholar 

Elbaz S, Cinalioglu K, Sekhon K, Gruber J, Rigas C, Bodenstein K, et al. A systematic review of telemedicine for older adults with dementia during COVID-19: an alternative to In-person health services? Front Neurol. 2021;12:761965.

Google Scholar 

Donelan K, Barreto EA, Sossong S, Michael C, Estrada JJ, Cohen AB, et al. Patient and clinician experiences with telehealth for patient follow-up care. Am J Manag Care. 2019;25(1):40–4.

Google Scholar 

Edirippulige S, Martin-Khan M, Beattie E, Smith AC, Gray LC. A systematic review of telemedicine services for residents in long term care facilities. J Telemed Telecare. 2013;19(3):127–32.

Google Scholar 

Thaker DA, Monypenny R, Olver I, Sabesan S. Cost savings from a telemedicine model of care in Northern Queensland, Australia. Med J Aust. 2013;199(6):414–7.

Google Scholar 

Sabesan S, Roberts LJ, Aiken P, Joshi A, Larkins S. Timely access to specialist medical oncology services closer to home for rural patients: experience from the Townsville teleoncology model. Aust J Rural Health. 2014;22(4):156–9.

Google Scholar 

Barbosa W, Zhou K, Waddell E, Myers T, Dorsey ER. Improving access to care: telemedicine across medical domains. Annu Rev Public Health. 2021;42:463–81.

Google Scholar 

Huang F, Blaschke S, Lucas H. Beyond pilotitis: taking digital health interventions to the National level in China and Uganda. Global Health. 2017;13(1):49.

Google Scholar 

Wade V, Eliott J. The role of the champion in telehealth service development: a qualitative analysis. J Telemed Telecare. 2012;18(8):490–2.

Google Scholar 

Moffatt JJ, Eley DS. Barriers to the up-take of telemedicine in Australia – a view from providers. RRH. 2011;11(2):1581.

Keenan AJ, Tsourtos G, Tieman J. The value of applying ethical principles in telehealth practices: systematic review. J Med Internet Res. 2021;23(3):e25698.

Google Scholar 

Joseph V, West RM, Shickle D, Keen J, Clamp S. Key challenges in the development and implementation of telehealth projects. J Telemed Telecare. 2011;17(2):71–7.

Google Scholar 

Offermann-van Heek J. Perspektiven-abhängige Wahrnehmung von Altern und Pflege verbunden mit der Akzeptanz unterstützender Technik (1st Edition). Aachen: Apprimus Verlag. [Dissertation, HCIC Center, RWTH Aachen University].

Kuhlmey A, Blüher S, Nordheim J, Zöllick J. Technik in der Pflege – Einstellungen von professionell pflegenden zu Chancen und Risiken neuer Technologien und technischer assistenzsysteme. Abschlussbericht für das Zentrum für Qualität in der Pflege (ZQP); 2019. https://www.zqp.de/wp-content/uploads/ZQP-Bericht-Technik-profPflege.pdf

Piras I, Barbieri B, Bellini D, Pibiri V, de Simone S, Mondo M, et al. Nurses’ experience with telecare: a qualitative analysis of perceptions and implications for caring and the nursing profession. BMC Nurs. 2025;24(1):908.

Google Scholar 

Kamal SA, Shafiq M, Kakria P. Investigating acceptance of telemedicine services through an extended technology acceptance model (TAM). Technol Soc. 2020;60:101212.

Google Scholar 

Rahimi B, Nadri H, Lotfnezhad Afshar H, Timpka T. A systematic review of the technology acceptance model in health informatics. Appl Clin Inf. 2018;9(3):604–34.

Google Scholar 

Davis FD, Perceived, Usefulness. Perceived ease of Use, and user acceptance of information technology. MIS Q. 1989;13(3):319.

Google Scholar 

Venkatesh V, Morris MG, Davis GB, Davis FD. User acceptance of information technology: toward a unified view. MIS Quarterly 2003:425–78. https://doi.org/10.2307/30036540

Livesay K, Petersen S, Walter R, Zhao L, Butler-Henderson K, Abdolkhani R. Sociotechnical challenges of digital health in nursing practice during the COVID-19 pandemic: National study. JMIR Nurs. 2023;6:e46819.

Google Scholar 

Karsh B-T, Holden RJ, Alper SJ, Or CKL. A human factors engineering paradigm for patient safety: designing to support the performance of the healthcare professional. Qual Saf Health Care. 2006;15(Suppl 1):i59–65.

Google Scholar 

May CR, Mair F, Finch T, MacFarlane A, Dowrick C, Treweek S, et al. Development of a theory of implementation and integration: normalization process theory. Implement Sci. 2009;4:29.

Google Scholar 

Hastall MR, Dockweiler C, Mühlhaus J. Achieving end user acceptance: Building blocks for an Evidence-Based user-Centered framework for health technology development and assessment. In: Antona M, Stephanidis C, editors. Universal access in Human–Computer Interaction. Human and technological environments. Cham: Springer International Publishing; 2017. pp. 13–25. (Lecture Notes in Computer Science).

Google Scholar 

Garavand A, Aslani N, Nadri H, Abedini S, Dehghan S. Acceptance of telemedicine technology among physicians: A systematic review. Inf Med Unlocked. 2022;30:100943.

Google Scholar 

Ross J, Stevenson F, Lau R, Murray E. Factors that influence the implementation of e-health: a systematic review of systematic reviews (an update). Implement Sci. 2016;11(1):146.

Google Scholar 

Mair FS, May C, O’Donnell C, Finch T, Sullivan F, Murray E. Factors that promote or inhibit the implementation of e-health systems: an explanatory systematic review. Bull World Health Organ. 2012;90(5):357–64.

Google Scholar 

Page MJ, McKenzie JE, Bossuyt PM, Boutron I, Hoffmann TC, Mulrow CD, et al. The PRISMA 2020 statement: an updated guideline for reporting systematic reviews. BMJ. 2021;372:n71.

Google Scholar 

Harrison R, Jones B, Gardner P, Lawton R. Quality assessment with diverse studies (QuADS): an appraisal tool for methodological and reporting quality in systematic reviews of mixed- or multi-method studies. BMC Health Serv Res. 2021;21(1):144.

Google Scholar 

Cormi C, Chrusciel J, Fayol A, van Rechem M, Abou-Amsha K, Tixier M et al. The use of telemedicine in nursing homes: A Mixed-Method study to identify critical factors when connecting with a general hospital. Int J Environ Res Public Health 2021; 18(21):11148.

Kozikowski A, Shotwell J, Wool E, Slaboda JC, Abrashkin KA, Rhodes K, et al. Care team perspectives and acceptance of telehealth in scaling a Home-Based primary care program: qualitative study. JMIR Aging. 2019;2(1):e12415.

Google Scholar 

Øyen KR, Sunde OS, Solheim M, Moricz S, Ytrehus S. Understanding attitudes toward information and communication technology in home-care: information and communication technology as a market good within Norwegian welfare services. Inf Health Soc Care. 2018;43(3):300–9.

Google Scholar 

Toh HJ, Chia J, Koh E, Lam K, Magpantay GC, de Leon CM et al. User Perceptions of the Telemedicine Programme in Nursing Homes – The Singapore Perspective. In: Proceedings of the 1st International Conference on Information and Communication Technologies for Ageing Well and e-Health. SCITEPRESS – Science and and Technology Publications; 2015. pp. 97–105. https://www.scitepress.org/papers/2015/54369/54369.pdf

Appleman ER, O’Connor MK, Rockefeller W, Morin P, Moo LR. Using video telehealth to deliver Patient-Centered collaborative care: the G-IMPACT pilot. Clin Gerontol. 2022;45(4):1010–19.

O’Sullivan JL, Gellert P, Hesse B, Jordan L-M, Möller S, Voigt-Antons J-N et al. Exploring attitudes of healthcare professionals towards ICT-based interventions for nursing home residents with dementia: A mixed-methods approach. Contemp Nurse. 2018; 54(1):13–25. Available from: URL: https://search.ebscohost.com/login.aspx?direct=true%26;db=psyh%26;AN=2018-21753-003%26;site=ehost-live.

Chang J-Y, Chen L-K, Chang C-C. Perspectives and expectations for telemedicine opportunities from families of nursing home residents and caregivers in nursing homes. Int J Med Inf. 2009;78(7):494–502.

Google Scholar 

Piau A, Vautier C, de Mauleon A, Tchalla A, Rumeau P, Nourhashemi F, et al. Health workers perception on telemedicine in management of neuropsychiatric symptoms in long-term care facilities: two years follow-up. Geriatr Nurs. 2020;41(6):1000–5.

Google Scholar 

Plunger P, Eitenberger M, Kletecka-Pulker M, Wochele-Thoma T, Klager E, Ruf AK et al. Using telemedicine in nursing homes during the COVID-19 pandemic: A multi-perspective view on the implementation process. Nurs Open. 2022;9(2):1155-63.

Sävenstedt S, Bucht G, Norberg L, Sandman PO. Nurse-doctor interaction in teleconsultations between a hospital and a geriatric nursing home. J Telemed Telecare. 2002;8(1):11–8.

Google Scholar 

Silsand L, Severinsen G-H, Berntsen G. Preservation of person-centered care through videoconferencing for patient follow-up during the COVID-19 pandemic: case study of a multidisciplinary care team. JMIR Form Res. 2021;5(3):e25220.

Google Scholar 

van der Cingel M, Bulle-Smid L, Holterman S, Prins H, Keuning W, Hettinga M. From clinical reasoning to ehealth interventions; a study on how nurses asses care and ehealth in home care. Nurse Educ Pract. 2021;50:102925.

Google Scholar 

Bagot K, Moloczij N, Arthurson L, Hair C, Hancock S, Bladin CF, et al. Nurses’ role in implementing and sustaining acute telemedicine: A Mixed-Methods, Pre-Post design using an extended technology acceptance model. J Nurs Scholarsh. 2020;52(1):34–46.

Google Scholar 

Newbould L, Ariss S, Mountain G, Hawley MS. Exploring factors that affect the uptake and sustainability of videoconferencing for healthcare provision for older adults in care homes: a realist evaluation. BMC Med Inf Decis Mak. 2021;21(1):13.

Google Scholar 

DelliFraine JL, Dansky KH, Rumberger JS. The use of knowledge management in telemedicine and perceived effects on patient care activities. International Journal of Healthcare Technology and Management. 2009;10(3):196–209. Available from: URL:https://www.embase.com/search/results?subaction=viewrecord&id=L354694172&from=export.

Eastman P, Dowd A, White J, Carter J, Ely M. Telehealth: rapid adoption in community palliative care due to COVID-19: patient and professional evaluation. BMJ Support Palliat Care; 2021;14:e438-e442.

Lemon C, Liu N, Lane S, Sud A, Branley J, Khadra M, et al. Changes in user perceptions of a telemedicine system over time: from initial implementation to everyday use. Telemed J E Health. 2018;24(7):552–9.

Google Scholar 

Omboni S, Padwal RS, Alessa T, Benczúr B, Green BB, Hubbard I, et al. The worldwide impact of telemedicine during COVID-19: current evidence and recommendations for the future. Connect Health. 2022;1:7–35.

Google Scholar 

Cresswell K, Sheikh A. Organizational issues in the implementation and adoption of health information technology innovations: an interpretative review. Int J Med Inf. 2013;82(5):e73–86.

Google Scholar 

Magi CE, Longobucco Y, Amato C, Camedda C, Balestri C, El Aoufy K, et al. Enhancing the comfort of hospitalized elderly patients: pain management strategies for painful nursing procedures. Front Med (Lausanne). 2024;11:1390695.

Google Scholar 

Solimini R, Busardò FP, Gibelli F, Sirignano A, Ricci G. Ethical and legal challenges of telemedicine in the era of the COVID-19 pandemic. Med (Kaunas). 2021;57(12):1314.

Nittari G, Khuman R, Baldoni S, Pallotta G, Battineni G, Sirignano A, et al. Telemedicine practice: review of the current ethical and legal challenges. Telemed J E Health. 2020;26(12):1427–37.

Google Scholar 

Mort M, Roberts C, Pols J, Domenech M, Moser I. Ethical implications of home Telecare for older people: a framework derived from a multisited participative study. Health Expect. 2015;18(3):438–49.

Google Scholar 

Langarizadeh M, Moghbeli F, Aliabadi A. Application of ethics for providing telemedicine services and information technology. Med Arch. 2017;71(5):351–5.

Google Scholar 

Thomas EE, Taylor ML, Ward EC, Hwang R, Cook R, Ross J-A et al. Beyond forced telehealth adoption: A framework to sustain telehealth among allied health services. J Telemed Telecare 2022;30(3):559-69.

Gallegos-Rejas VM, Thomas EE, Kelly JT, Smith AC. A multi-stakeholder approach is needed to reduce the digital divide and encourage equitable access to telehealth. J Telemed Telecare. 2023;29(1):73–8.

Google Scholar 

Wetzlmair L-C, O’Carroll V, O’Malley AS, Murray S. Teleconsultation in health and social care professions education: A systematic review. Clin Teach. 2022;19(5):e13519.

Google Scholar 

World Health Organization. Consolidated telemedicine implementation guide; 2022. [cited 2024 Jul 21]. Available from: URL: https://iris.who.int/bitstream/handle/10665/364221/9789240059184-eng.pdf?sequence=1.

Orrange S, Patel A, Mack WJ, Cassetta J. Patient satisfaction and trust in telemedicine during the COVID-19 pandemic: retrospective observational study. JMIR Hum Factors. 2021;8(2):e28589.

Google Scholar 

Yee V, Bajaj SS, Stanford FC. Paradox of telemedicine: Building or neglecting trust and equity. Lancet Digit Health. 2022;4(7):e480–1.

Google Scholar 

Barchielli C, Marullo C, Bonciani M, Vainieri M. Nurses and the acceptance of innovations in technology-intensive contexts: the need for tailored management strategies. BMC Health Serv Res. 2021;21(1):639.

Google Scholar 

Venkatesh, Thong. Xu. Consumer acceptance and use of information technology: extending the unified theory of acceptance and use of technology. MIS Q. 2012;36(1):157.

Google Scholar 

Kissi J, Dai B, Dogbe CS, Banahene J, Ernest O. Predictive factors of physicians’ satisfaction with telemedicine services acceptance. Health Inf J. 2020;26(3):1866–80.

Google Scholar 

Damschroder LJ, Reardon CM, Widerquist MAO, Lowery J. The updated consolidated framework for implementation research based on user feedback. Implement Sci. 2022;17(1):75.

Google Scholar 

Kirk MA, Kelley C, Yankey N, Birken SA, Abadie B, Damschroder L. A systematic review of the use of the consolidated framework for implementation research. Implement Sci. 2016;11:72.

Google Scholar