Chinese online companies costly battle for dominance
The battle has seen companies burn through massive amounts of cash, with Nomura analysts estimating industry-wide cash burn at over $4 billion in the second quarter alone. Executives have openly discussed the pressures. JD.com CEO Sandy Xu warned of “excessive competition,” while Meituan CEO Wang Xing noted a “new phase of competition.”The price war started earlier this year when JD.com launched a food-delivery app to compete directly with Meituan’s core business. Alibaba, which owns the Ele.me food-delivery app, quickly followed suit by increasing its own investments in the segment.Analysts believe this high-stakes competition will persist. Kenneth Fong, head of internet research for UBS Investment Bank in China, described the landscape as a “high-stakes ‘game of chicken’” and anticipates the competition will continue through at least the Singles’ Day shopping festival in November.
‘Worry’ for Chinese government
This downward pricing spiral is of particular concern to Chinese regulators, who are worried about a deflationary trend amid weak property prices and job instability. They have repeatedly warned platforms against a “race to the bottom” in pricing. As a result, Meituan, Alibaba, and JD.com released statements in July pledging to curb price wars. Ying Wang, a senior analyst at Moody’s Ratings, expects that these commitments will “gradually rationalize competitive dynamics.”
Impact on profits and broader Chinese economy
The financial toll is significant. S&P Global analysts predict that Meituan, JD.com, and Alibaba could spend at least 160 billion yuan ($22.37 billion) over the next 12 to 18 months. They anticipate “significant downward revisions” to profits and believe margins will not recover for at least another 12 to 24 months.Meituan is expected to be the most affected, as food delivery is its main revenue source. The Reuters report notes that JD.com’s food-delivery losses nearly erased its second-quarter profit.The competitive landscape is also impacting companies that have largely stayed out of the instant retail battle. PDD Holdings, which operates the Pinduoduo platform, is seeing its low-cost advantage eroded by rivals’ aggressive discounting.