Julian PaszkiewiczYou and Yours, Teddington and
Eve WatsonLondon

A homeowner in west London says “he does not know what to believe” after his home’s energy performance was incorrectly rated after he spent £60,000 on green upgrades.
Michael De Podesta, who owns a1920s semi-detached house in Teddington, told BBC Radio 4’s You and Yours about work done to his home such as solar panels and triple glazing to make it more energy efficient.
Afterwards, the home was given an EPC (Energy Performance Certificate) rating of B however after having more work carried out it incorrectly went down to a C.
The company which carried out the last assessment, Compass Property Projects, said it made a mistake however there are calls for the government to overhaul the system.

EPCs, which were introduced in 2007, rate properties by energy efficiency, with the most efficient properties rated A and the least efficient G.
They are important because an EPC is needed to sell or rent out a home. There are plans to force landlords to get all their properties up to a C rating or better by 2030.
‘Extraordinarily efficient’
Mr De Podesta, a chartered physicist, started by installing triple glazing, external insulation and solar panels which gave his old house a B rating.
Pleased with that, he then completed the final phase of the project which involved getting a heat pump and more solar panels.
“I had this EPC B and thought this house is extraordinarily efficient to run. All the bills for heating last year came to £160 – it’s crazily efficient. Surely it should have an A rating?”

However after he had another EPC assessment after finishing all the work, he said he was astonished to find out his rating had dropped to a C.
“I just don’t know what to trust. I don’t think it reliably reflects the state of the property,” Mr De Podesta said.
Compass Property Projects has apologised to Mr De Podesta, refunded him and restored his home’s B rating.
It also said an energy performance rating was not a full structural survey.
He has since had another survey, which recorded an A EPC rating.
‘Hundreds of complaints’
All EPCs and the people who carry out the assessments must be accredited.
Elmhurst Energy runs software assessors used to collect information, calculate a rating and produce the certificate.
Its CEO, Stuart Fairlie, said incorrect ratings was a common problem and he has had hundreds of complaints.
“Unfortunately, the methodology by which the energy assessors uses is based on price and electricity is more expensive than gas,” he said.
Mr Fairlie said the process was “out of date” but there was not a lot which could be done unless the government changed the methodology.
He said he hoped it would happen next year.
Last year a Which? investigation found eight out of 11 homeowners it spoke to found basic errors in the information recorded on their EPCs.
Mr Fairlie said his company was independent of assessors and tries to “arbitrate for the truth”.
“Most of these problems were all about education and telling people that actually, yes you have put this particular type of heating in and that’s made a difference, but there were one or two that were honest mistakes by energy assessors and [homeowners] ended up with a correct certificate,” he added.
The Department of Housing, Communities and Local Government finished a consultation on the topic in February.
The department also announced that all rented homes would need to have an EPC rating of at least C by 2028 for new tenancies and all tenancies by 2030.
A spokesperson said the department was still working through the responses.