LAHORE: Pakistan’s construction sector stands at a crossroads. With large-scale infrastructure projects, ranging from road networks and dams to urban development and special economic zones, either underway or planned, the potential for growth is considerable.
Yet, despite these promising prospects, domestic engineering and construction firms are struggling to keep pace. Their inefficiencies have created an opening for more agile and competent foreign competitors. Chinese, South Korean and European firms continue to outbid local players and secure high-value contracts across Pakistan.
This dominance is not solely a matter of superior machinery or deeper financial resources. It reflects operational discipline, structured learning and a commitment to innovation — traits that remain largely underdeveloped in Pakistani firms. Central to this problem is low productivity, rooted in a complex web of institutional weaknesses.
Poor accountability, ineffective talent management, and the absence of standardised procedures lead to delays and cost overruns. Many companies operate on outdated models, reinventing the wheel with each new project rather than building on past experience. Attempts to adopt technology are rare, and when made, often fail due to inadequate planning or training.
Perhaps the most glaring shortcoming is the absence of institutional memory. Successful international firms learn systematically from both failure and success, codifying insights into frameworks that guide future operations. In contrast, Pakistani firms operate project-to-project, with little cohesion or continuity. Lessons are not captured, and mistakes are repeated.
More worrying is the lack of long-term resilience among local construction giants. In the past four decades, only a handful of firms have demonstrated institutional longevity. Most collapse after a high-profile failure — undone by poor planning, overextension or weak internal controls. This cycle discourages investment in staff development and systems improvement, both of which are essential for sustained competitiveness.
A further critical weakness is ineffective planning and target-setting. Without the ability to reliably estimate costs, timelines, or resource needs, companies cannot formulate credible plans or meaningful performance indicators. The result is underperformance, client dissatisfaction, and increasing marginalisation of local firms in major bids.
To remain competitive and reclaim lost ground, Pakistani construction firms must pursue strategic transformation. This begins with articulating a shared set of values and measurable goals, internalised at every level — from top management to workers on site. Firms must institutionalise performance tracking, invest in capacity-building, and embrace pilot programmes to test innovations before scaling them.
Moreover, technology adoption is no longer optional. From project management software to Building Information Modelling (BIM) and AI-driven risk analysis, digital tools can dramatically improve efficiency and accuracy. However, effective deployment depends on a trained workforce and a shift in mindset away from traditional practices.
Pakistan’s expanding infrastructure needs should present a major opportunity for domestic firms. But this potential will remain unrealised unless they adapt — quickly and decisively. The industry must abandon its reactive stance and embrace a forward-looking, learning-oriented approach. Only then can it compete with global players and play a meaningful role in the country’s economic development.