Author: admin

  • Greece eliminate reigning EuroBasket champions Spain

    Greece eliminate reigning EuroBasket champions Spain

    The official EuroBasket app

    LIMASSOL (Cyprus) – There will be a new champion at FIBA EuroBasket 2025 as Greece eliminated reigning champs Spain from contention by bouncing back from their last loss to head to the FIBA EuroBasket 2025 knockout stage with confidence.

    Greece set the tone early in beating the four-time winners 90-86 for a 4-1 record and first place in Group C. Spain for their part finished group play with a 2-3 record, failing to advance from the opening stage for the first time since 1977.

    Greece’s win means Georgia also booked their ticket for Riga as they had a 2-3 record and beat Spain.

    Turning Point

    Tyler Dorsey scored 14 points and Greece went on a 14-0 run to open a 30-14 lead – thanks to 8 of 10 three-pointers. Spain fought back into the game and pulled within 38-33 before the Greeks responded with a 13-2 close to the first half and went into the break up 50-36.

    Spain fought all the way to tie the game 71-71 and eventually pulled ahead 84-82. But Giannis Antetokounmpo scored two baskets to shift the momentum back to Greece. Juancho Hernangomez missed all three free throws with 13 seconds left and Spain down 88-84 and Santi Aldama only split two foul shots with 9.4 seconds remaining.

    TCL Player of the Game

    Giannis Antetokounmpo started the game slow scoring wise with just 2 points in the first quarter but he had 4 assists. The NBA superstar finished the game flirting with a triple-double in gathering 25 points, 13 rebounds and 9 assists.

    Tyler Dorsey added 22 points on 6 three-pointers, 5 rebounds and 4 assists and Kostas Sloukas chipped in 12 poinrs and 6 assists in the victory. Jaime Pradilla had 14 points to lead Spain, who also had Mario Saint-Supery score 13 points and Santi Aldama added 12 points and 6 rebounds.

    Stats Don’t Lie

    Greece shot 53 percent for the game including 48 percent on three-pointers. Spain only committed 7 turnovers but they made just 21 of 37 free throws for 57 percent

    Bottom Line

    Greece finished top of the group and will go to Riga on a high having beaten and eliminated the reigning champions Spain. With the loss, Spain became the first champion unable to advance from the first group stage since 1993 winners Germany were ousted in 1995.

    Spain actually had dominated Greece of late with a 19-7 record including seven wins in the eight games since 2006, including the FIBA Basketball World Cup 2006 Final, the Semi-Finals of the 2007 and 2009 EuroBaskets and the 2015 EuroBasket Quarter-Finals.

    They Said

    This game report will be updated in the coming moments. Stay tuned.

    For more quotes, tune in to the official post-game press conference!

    FIBA

    Continue Reading

  • Cat euthanized after eating H5N1-contaminated RAWR raw food

    Cat euthanized after eating H5N1-contaminated RAWR raw food

    The Food and Drug Administration (FDA) has confirmed H5N1 highly pathogenic avian influenza (HPAI) contamination in specific lots of RAWR Raw Cat Food Chicken Eats following the death of a cat that consumed the product. Whole genome sequencing indicates the virus strains detected in the animal and the contaminated pet food originated from a common source.

    The San Francisco Department of Public Health notified federal authorities after a cat became ill with H5N1 and was subsequently euthanized. The animal had consumed product from Lot CCS 25 093 with a sell-by date of October 3, 2026. Initial PCR testing of the open product sample collected from the pet owner detected H5N1, which was later confirmed through additional testing by USDA National Veterinary Services Laboratories.

    FDA collected and tested two retail samples of the same product from a different lot (CCS 25 077, sell-by date September 18, 2026). Both samples tested positive for Influenza A Virus, with one sample confirmed positive for H5N1 through whole genome sequencing.

    The contaminated products are sold frozen in 2.5-pound resealable plastic bags containing 40 one-ounce sliders. The yellow and white bags with black lettering are distributed in retail stores nationwide and online. Lot CCS 25 077 is printed on the center back of affected bags.

    “FDA is concerned about the lots of RAWR Raw Cat Food Chicken Eats described above because whole genome sequencing suggests the H5N1 detected in the now-deceased cat and in Lots CCS 25 093 and CCS 25 077 of the Chicken Eats product originated from a common source of contamination,” the agency stated in its release.

    Laboratory analysis identified the virus as genotype B3.13, which has previously been found in other raw poultry-based pet food brands associated with feline illness or death. The sequencing results showed H5N1 from all three samples were within the same cluster, indicating relatedness to a virus lineage detected from November to December 2024 that is no longer circulating.

    H5N1 can cause illness and death in birds, poultry and mammals including domestic cats and large felids such as panthers, bobcats and mountain lions. While dogs can contract the virus, they typically exhibit mild clinical signs and lower mortality rates compared to cats. No cases have been detected in dogs within the U.S., though fatal cases have occurred in other countries.

    The FDA reports no known human cases of HPAI contracted through exposure to contaminated pet food. The agency continues its investigation and will provide updates as new information becomes available.

    Continue Reading

  • Stardew Valley Creator ConcernedApe has a Cameo Role in Hollow Knight: Silksong

    Stardew Valley Creator ConcernedApe has a Cameo Role in Hollow Knight: Silksong

    Stardew Valley creator Eric “ConcernedApe” Barone has a cameo role in Team Cherry’s new mega hit indie game, Hollow Knight: Silksong.

    The sequel to Team Cherry’s original bleak and beloved metroidvania game finally launched across PC and consoles earlier today, bringing an end to more than six painful years of anticipation. As what is sure to be millions of fans swarm to see if the wait was worth it, The Verge has pointed out that the Hollow Knight: Silksong credits tease a special cameo from one of the most notable indie developers of the last decade.

    Those who navigate to the Hollow Knight sequel’s credits – which can be found in the “extras” option on the main menu – will notice that Barone is featured among the shortlist of names included under “Additional Character Voices.” It means that, if you know where to look, you’ll be able to hear the mastermind behind farming sim sensation Stardew Valley among those lending their voice talents to the land of Pharloom and all of its insect inhabitants.

    Hollow Knight: Silksong Credits Feature Stardew Valley Creator Eric “ConcernedApe” Barone. Image captured in Hollow Knight: Silksong by IGN.

    Unfortunately, it’s a bit unclear how exactly Barone is featured in Hollow Knight: Silksong. ConcernedApe’s head of operations and business development, Cole Medeiros, confirmed with The Verge that, while the Stardew Valley creator does indeed play a role in the Hollow Knight follow-up, they aren’t ready to reveal who he plays. Medeiros added that Barone would “rather not say which character(s) so as not to spoil any surprises for anyone.”

    Although hundreds of thousands of players have already logged in to Steam to play Hollow Knight: Silksong on a Thursday morning, it might take some time to find how Barone is featured. Team Cherry made the metroidvania sequel available for players today, September 4, 2025, for $19.99 for PC, Nintendo Switch, Nintendo Switch 2, PlayStation 4, PlayStation 5, Xbox One, and Xbox Series X | S, and it immediately helped cause digital storefronts like Steam and the Nintendo eShop to crash. As fans continue to pour in, they’ll be met with a game that appears to be substantially bigger than the already quite large original Hollow Knight.

    As fans continue to turn over every bug boss and creepy enemy in search of Barone, you can see how players can take advantage of enhanced features in the Switch 2 version of Hollow Knight: Silksong. You can also see why the announcement of Hollow Knight: Silksong’s release date had a few other developers ready to change their own schedules.

    Michael Cripe is a freelance writer with IGN. He’s best known for his work at sites like The Pitch, The Escapist, and OnlySP. Be sure to give him a follow on Bluesky (@mikecripe.bsky.social) and Twitter (@MikeCripe).

    Continue Reading

  • AMGEN TO PRESENT AT THE MORGAN STANLEY 23RD ANNUAL GLOBAL HEALTHCARE CONFERENCE| Amgen

    AMGEN TO PRESENT AT THE MORGAN STANLEY 23RD ANNUAL GLOBAL HEALTHCARE CONFERENCE| Amgen

    THOUSAND OAKS, Calif., Sept. 4, 2025 /PRNewswire/ — Amgen (NASDAQ:AMGN) will present at the Morgan Stanley 23rd Annual Global Healthcare Conference at 9:15 a.m. ET on September 9, 2025. Peter Griffith, executive vice president and chief financial officer at Amgen, and Kave Niksefat, senior vice president of Global Marketing and Access at Amgen, will present at the conference. The webcast will be broadcast over the internet simultaneously and will be available to members of the news media, investors and the general public.

    The webcast, as with other selected presentations regarding developments in Amgen’s business given by management at certain investor and medical conferences, can be found on Amgen’s website, www.amgen.com, under Investors. Information regarding presentation times, webcast availability and webcast links are noted on Amgen’s Investor Relations Events Calendar. The webcast will be archived and available for replay for at least 90 days after the event.

    About Amgen

    Amgen discovers, develops, manufactures and delivers innovative medicines to help millions of patients in their fight against some of the world’s toughest diseases. More than 40 years ago, Amgen helped to establish the biotechnology industry and remains on the cutting-edge of innovation, using technology and human genetic data to push beyond what’s known today. Amgen is advancing a broad and deep pipeline that builds on its existing portfolio of medicines to treat cancer, heart disease, osteoporosis, inflammatory diseases and rare diseases. 

    In 2024, Amgen was named one of the “World’s Most Innovative Companies” by Fast Company and one of “America’s Best Large Employers” by Forbes, among other external recognitions. Amgen is one of the 30 companies that comprise the Dow Jones Industrial Average®, and it is also part of the Nasdaq-100 Index®, which includes the largest and most innovative non-financial companies listed on the Nasdaq Stock Market based on market capitalization. 

    For more information, visit Amgen.com and follow us on X (formerly known as Twitter), LinkedIn, Instagram, YouTube and Threads.

    CONTACT: Amgen, Thousand OaksElissa Snook, 609-251-1407 (media) Adam Elinoff, 805-490-9578 (investors)   

     

    Cision View original content to download multimedia:https://www.prnewswire.com/news-releases/amgen-to-present-at-the-morgan-stanley-23rd-annual-global-healthcare-conference-302546881.html

    SOURCE Amgen


    Continue Reading

  • Charlie Munger Called Himself A Costco ‘Addict’ — ‘They Did It All Right And They Had a Lot of Parking,’ Praising Oversized 10-Foot Spaces

    Charlie Munger Called Himself A Costco ‘Addict’ — ‘They Did It All Right And They Had a Lot of Parking,’ Praising Oversized 10-Foot Spaces

    Charlie Munger passed away in November 2023 just weeks before his 100th birthday, but one of his final longform conversations gave fans a parting gift: more of his unfiltered wisdom, and yes, another sermon on Costco (NASDAQ:COST).

    Recorded at his Los Angeles home for the “Acquired” podcast in October 2023, the dinner-table interview stretched across nearly every corner of Munger’s career — from early mistakes in retail to his partnership with Warren Buffett — but it was Costco that brought out some of his sharpest, most memorable lines.

    Buffett had long teased him about it. At one Berkshire Hathaway (NYSE:BRK, BRK.B))
    meeting, Buffett joked that if hijackers offered Munger one last request, he’d ask to deliver his speech on the virtues of Costco — prompting Buffett to quip, “Shoot me first.” Munger didn’t deny it. “Warren was kidding me for being so repetitive on the subject,” he admitted.

    Don’t Miss:

    But for him, Costco wasn’t just another retailer. It was one of those rare moments in investing when conviction met clarity. “There aren’t many times in a lifetime when you know you’re right and you know you have one that’s really going to work wonderfully,” Munger said.

    Asked what made Costco so special, he was ready with an answer. “They really did sell cheaper than anybody else in America and they did it in big, efficient stores,” Munger explained. “The parking spaces were 10 feet wide instead of eight or nine feet or whatever they normally are. They did it all right and they had a lot of parking spaces.”

    That little detail about parking spaces summed up how Munger thought about business: small touches mattered, especially when they reflected a bigger philosophy of efficiency and customer focus. He admired how Costco turned those efficiencies into loyalty. “They gave special benefits to the people who did come to the stores in the way of reward points,” he said, nodding to the company’s executive membership program. “Yeah. It all worked.”

    Trending: 7 Million Gamers Already Trust Gameflip With Their Digital Assets — Now You Can Own a Stake in the Platform

    He also respected Costco’s financial discipline. The company ran what he described as a capital-light model, stretching payment terms with suppliers and avoiding bloated balance sheets. With more than 900 warehouses worldwide, Costco had achieved scale without losing sight of fundamentals.

    Continue Reading

  • Best AI Wearables 2025 – Forbes Vetted

    Best AI Wearables 2025 – Forbes Vetted

    If you thought AI was already almost indispensable, watch out, because now you can wear an AI gadget designed to record everything you say and hear, and distill it down to a handy summary. These devices promise to give you perfect recall of every conversation. Record every meeting. Settle arguments. Make a to-do list plucked out of your conversations, seemingly like magic. That’s what the best AI wearables like the Bee Pioneer Edition and Plaud NotePin promise, anyway.

    I tested all of the AI wearables you can buy right now—Bee, Plaud Pin, Omi and Limitless Pendant—for a full month. When you think of these gadgets, some people might imagine an episode of Black Mirror. But the reality was that these gadgets proved to be surprisingly helpful. What’s it like to wear a device that takes detailed notes on your every waking moment? Read on to see what I thought of each of these wearable gadgets.

    Graphic The 6 Best Places To Buy Contacts Online In 2025 (Including My Personal Go-To)
    Graphic The 3 Best Automatic Litter Boxes Of 2025 That Excelled In My 3-Cat Household

    AI Wearables, At A Glance:

    Let’s not bury the lede—here are the best reasons to buy each of these AI pendants:

    • Bee Pioneer Edition: A great way to get your feet wet in the world of AI wearables; works far better than you have any right to expect for $50, and there’s no monthly subscription fee.
    • Plaud NotePin: Superb summaries, transcriptions and mind maps, though you’ll need to turn it on and off throughout the day. Even so, it’s my favorite for the workplace.
    • Limitless Pendant: With short, bulleted summaries that expand into the actual transcription for details, Limitless is probably too concise and not helpful enough for some people.
    • Omi: Good summaries with a strong emphasis on its app ecosystem and future extendibility. This gadget has a ton of potential, though I do worry a little about its data privacy.

    Read on to see what I thought about each one of these AI pendants.


    Dimensions: Pill-shaped, 1.8 x 0.8 inches | Charging: USB-C | Data and Security: Not HIPAA compliant, raw audio deleted immediately | Wear style: Clip on, wristband | Recording mode: All day/lifelogging | Battery life: Seven days

    Pros:

    • Elegant UI that shows to-dos and summarizes your day as well as individual meetings and conversations
    • Ridiculously inexpensive with no ongoing subscription
    • Always on (unless you mute it)
    • A full week of battery life

    Cons:

    • You have to approve every to-do and fact about yourself; fall behind and it becomes unmanageable
    • Frequently hallucinates or misunderstands the details of conversations and meetings
    • Right now, iPhone only (Android reportedly coming soon)

    You can wear the Bee as a pendant—it comes with a clip you can pin to your clothing—or around your wrist like a fitness band. Aside from a mute button, there are no controls on the Bee itself; the Bee just sits in the background, listening and recording. (Unlike the other AI pendants, Bee lights up when muted; all the others display a recording light.)

    Like the other AI wearables, all the action happens in the mobile app. Right now, it’s only compatible with iPhone, though an Android version is reportedly coming soon. The app displays daily summaries and suggests to-dos based on what it has heard. You can also use the chat mode to ask Bee questions, like “what day did we agree to go see the new Superman movie?” or “what tasks did my team want to give to the new hire?” That’s an important feature; Bee knows a lot more about your day than you’ll find in the summary, so if you want to know something specific, just ask.

    Among all the wearables, Bee tries the hardest to make you the hero of your personal story. Bee paints a picture of your day with an effusive headline (one of mine: “A day of home, dogs, cars, media, and shared moments with loved ones, punctuated by humor and affection”) and then waxes poetically about your day in the overview. For example: “Your day was a vibrant mix of personal routines, dog care, and a deep engagement with a variety of people whom you work with.” You get “key takeaways”—a bulleted list of the most important events—“atmosphere,” which describes the emotional tone of the day, and summaries of each major meeting and event throughout the day, arranged chronologically with time stamps. The transcript tab offers snippets of dialog throughout the day, organized by topic.

    But Bee can be more trouble than it’s worth. It hordes suggested to-dos that you need to manually approve one-by-one to move to the actual to-do tab, and I routinely get dozens of suggestions each day—many of which are teased out of entertainment content that Bee has mistaken for things I said. If you miss a day or two, things spiral out of control and you may have hundreds of suggested to-dos to wade through, enough to make me want to declare AI bankruptcy and toss Bee into a drawer forever.

    Likewise, it collects facts about me, which I have to review as well. Not only are many of these facts also mistakenly pulled from TV shows, podcasts, and other people I’ve talked to (“Dave is a criminal lawyer,” “Dave has previously worked at a rehabilitation center,” “Dave’s full name is David Elfman,”), but it offers contradictory facts from one day to the next, suggesting it isn’t internalizing its own data—and it’s entirely unclear what purpose this fact collection is supposed to serve, anyway. Bee doesn’t seem to use any of these facts to improve the way it processes information about me, which makes the whole exercise of reviewing these facts seem pointless. On the plus side, for Severance fans, it feels like Bee is telling you facts about your outie.

    Speaking of AI hallucinations, Bee isn’t good at knowing who is speaking at any given moment or outright thinks additional people were present for conversations. The good news is that while this is often amusing or perplexing, it generally doesn’t affect the usefulness of the summaries it provides.

    Bottom line: Bee is remarkable. It’s roughly as good as the competition for a fraction of the price, and now that Omi has moved to a subscription model, it’s the only pendant that doesn’t have an ongoing fee to pay each month. More than once I’ve used it to win a bet by proving what I said days earlier. It’s a somewhat reliable note-taker in meetings (even though it doesn’t know who’s speaking). I listen to a lot of podcasts, and sometimes it knows I’m listening to content, sometimes it doesn’t. But all this is likely to improve with software updates, so for a first-generation device with a fire-sale price, color me thoroughly impressed.


    Dimensions: Button shaped, 1.9 x 0.7 inches | Charging: Proprietary dock | Data and Security: HIPAA compliant, end-to-end data encryption | Wear style: Magnetic clip, optional wristband or lanyard | Recording mode: Per meeting | Battery life: 3-4 days, depending on how many meetings you record

    Pros:

    • Uses ChatGPT and Claude for excellent, accurate and multi-lingual transcriptions
    • Delivers the most immediately readable and useful summaries for each meeting and conversation
    • Preserves original recordings as well as transcripts and summaries
    • You can choose from summary templates for different professionals and applications

    Cons:

    • Most expensive wearable and requires an ongoing subscription
    • No overall to-do tracking like some AI wearables, though each meeting lists action items
    • You need to activate it for specific conversations—isn’t always on
    • Need to wait for recordings to transfer to your phone before summaries are available

    The Plaud NotePin is different than the other wearables in this roundup in two important ways. First, it’s not designed to be an always-on, life-logging device, capturing everything it hears all day long. Instead, you press the NotePin until it vibrates (and a small recording light comes on) to start capturing a specific meeting or conversation, and then press again to stop when the meeting is over.

    Secondly, while other gadgets emphasize their summaries, Plaud makes it super easy to access the original audio recordings as well as complete, aesthetically formatted transcripts in addition to excellent summaries—plus a visual tree-like mind map that organizes the topics from your conversation in a smart and visually engaging way. In fact, Plaud should be applauded for the elegance and usability of its app. And of course, you can use the Ask AI chat window to extract and synthesize information from the conversation as well.

    The NotePin is clearly optimized for professionals who need to capture details of interactions with co-workers or clients in vivid detail. Plaud includes an ecosystem of summary templates, which you can choose depending on the kind of meeting or conversation you need to transcribe. The default summary template is excellent and was all I needed for my day-to-day needs, but you can also choose templates created by a Plaud developer community for class lectures, job interviews, construction project meetings and medical sessions (like psychotherapy notes and and medical consultations).

    Out of the box, Plaud doesn’t automatically transcribe and summarize its recordings; I found that I had to select recently uploaded conversations and ask the app to create a summary. This is because Plaud ties its device to a subscription service—if you don’t have the unlimited plan ($240 per year) then you may need to be selective about which conversations you transcribe and summarize. You can buy 1,200 minutes per month for $99.

    If you do have the unlimited plan—or you’re not otherwise worried about running out of minutes—then AutoFlow is a cool feature. AutoFlow is automation you can use to automatically perform certain tasks. I was able to tell NotePin to automatically transcribe and summarize every conversation, for example, and that’s just for starters. I found you could transcribe only conversations with certain keywords, apply specific summary templates based on the kind of conversation, and optionally send emails when the transcription is complete.

    In many ways, Plaud seems like the most mature of the AI wearables. While it isn’t intended for always-on recording—something all the other gadgets are designed to do—its polished interface and community ecosystem of summary templates and potential integrations suggests it’s a formidable product.


    Dimensions: Button shaped, 1.2 x 0.5 inches | Charging: USB-C | Data and Security: HIPAA compliant, private and secure data | Wear style: Magnetic clip | Recording mode: All day/lifelogging | Battery life: Roughly two days

    Pros:

    • Bulleted summaries accompanied by transcriptions good for encapsulating meetings
    • Learns voices to distinguish speakers
    • Subscription tiers include free (20 hours/month) service
    • Always on (unless you mute it)

    Cons:

    • You don’t get thorough summaries—you need to crawl through transcriptions for detailed notes about meetings
    • Hyper-focused on summarizing meetings; you don’t get to-dos or broad summaries of the day

    Limitless looks like what you get if you connect a pair of Apple Airtags with a rubber hinge. The two discs stick together magnetically, so you can clip the pendant over clothes—but if you prefer, you can slip it onto a lanyard and wear it around your neck. That’s my preference, because the magnet isn’t especially powerful and more than once it slipped off my shirt. It has a side button you can use to start and stop recording.

    Like most of the products in this roundup, Limitless is designed to listen in the background all day long. Throughout the day, it uploads your conversations to the phone and groups your summaries with descriptive titles and timestamps for easy reference.

    Limitless organizes your conversations a little differently than other AI pendants: Within each conversation, Limitless creates a set of nested bullet points, breaking events into chunks. For example, Limitless divided an hour-long lunch chat into short 15-minute segments and entitled one, “A wide-ranging conversation about electric cars, including selling a Tesla, renting a Nissan, and the politics of tax credits.” Within that summary are a half dozen bullets summarizing part of the conversation, like: “Recounting a recent attempt to sell a Tesla” and “Frustration with a rented Nissan key fob and tire pressure.” Expand each of those bullets, and you get the actual transcribed conversations, divided by timestamp and speaker. It’s a no-nonsense, utilitarian way to encapsulate your day, but it’s not as fun to read as Bee or as elegantly organized as Plaud. And the info isn’t really summarized in the same way as, say Bee or Plaud. Some may appreciate the brevity, but I found relying on Limitless to be a lot of work. Of course, you can use the chat tab to ask the Limitless AI to find and summarize anything it has recorded.

    Unlike the other apps, which present each day one after the other in an infinite scroll, Limitless puts each day on its own page. You can swipe pages to change days, or tap a calendar to zip right to a specific date.

    The app has a ton of customization features—language, a custom word dictionary, how long to keep audio clips and much more. In theory, it also learns your voice, so it knows when you are speaking and can pick you out of a group conversation. You can also teach it other voices it’ll commonly hear, like coworkers, friends and family. All that said, I didn’t see it clearly understanding it was me when I was speaking throughout testing—but hopefully it’ll get better at that over time.

    Limitless gets pricey, though. The pendant has a one-time cost of $199 and comes with 20 hours per month of usage for free. You’ll probably burn through that pretty fast, though. It’s designed to be on all day long. A better bet is the Pro subscription (100 hours per month) for $19 per month, or the unlimited plan for $29 per month.


    Dimensions: Button shaped, 1.1 x 0.4 inches | Charging: Proprietary dock | Data and Security: Not HIPAA compliant, encryption at rest and in transit, secure storage | Wear style: Lanyard | Recording mode: All day/lifelogging | Battery life: One day

    Pros:

    • Exciting ecosystem of apps to process your recordings in different ways
    • Learns voices to distinguish speakers
    • Automatically collects relevant to-dos from your conversations
    • Always on (unless you mute it)

    Cons:

    • Omi transitioning from free service to $20/month subscription
    • Reasonable concerns about the privacy and security of the apps and integrations

    I find Omi utterly fascinating. While the app is similar to Bee—it summarizes your conversations while also extracting to-dos and various facts—it is the most future-facing of the AI pendants you can buy today. That’s because Omi’s parent company, Based Hardware, has built an open ecosystem of apps—essentially, plugins for the Omi app—that let you synthesize and manipulate your recordings in all sorts of cool and unexpected ways.

    In addition to the standard summarizer, there are hundreds of other options you can select, such as a cognitive bias detector (which gives recommendations for more objective thinking), a mentor app that dispenses advice about your conversations, a “lie detector,” a joke extractor that sniffs out humor in your day and many others. Don’t expect all of these apps to be gems, but the fact that Based Hardware is laying the groundwork for this kind of integration is really exciting. On the other hand, to use these apps, you need to give third party developers access to your personal data, which could be alarming to some.

    The Omi pendant is shaped like a fat coin (about a half-inch thick) and is meant to be worn around your neck on a lanyard. A button starts or stops recording, but you can leave it running all day long.

    The UI is a bit more minimalist than some of the competing AI pendants, but even so, the summaries are fun to read. Each one starts with a broad summary (and weirdly, the greeting, “hey now”), along with sections for the mood of the activity, action items, key takeaways, questions raised and funny or ‘otherwise’ notable quotes (like when Omi caught my fiancé in a rare moment admitting an error, saying: “‘You’re right. We should’ve turned right.’ — Beth.”)

    In keeping with the more minimalist approach, transcripts are a little harder to get to. There’s no way to see them directly in the app, though you can use a menu to export them, such as via email. Need more information than you can find in the summaries? Use the AI chat.

    I really like the fact that Omi confidently creates a pretty effective to-do list without forcing me to approve each one, like the overly-cautiously Bee. On the other hand, Omi’s fact collector—which seems similar to Bee’s—is weird in a different way. Its facts are referred to as “memories,” and there’s no apparent rhyme or reason for why Omi selects the ones that it does. Memories are a crazy combination of things I’ve personally said, other people have said, and things it overheard media saying. Aarav Garg, one of Omi’s founders, told me that the long term plan is for Omi to use these facts to build sophisticated understanding of the user and its environment, but they don’t appear to do much, if anything, at the moment. Moreover, like Limitless, Omi promises to learn both your own voice and those of others, though in my experience Omi couldn’t reliably tell me apart from others in practice.


    AI Recording Wearables, In Summary

    There are already no fewer than four AI wearables on the market, giving you a lot of choice if you want to clip a recorder to your shirt and let artificial intelligence keep track of your day for you. And while the tech is still in its infancy—ChatGPT debuted to the public less than three years ago, and these are all first-gen AI pendants—they’re quite good. I thoroughly enjoyed testing them, and will continue to use them (especially Plaud and Omi) long after this article has been published.

    If you’re looking to dabble in AI recording and mostly want to use a wearable to keep tabs on your personal life, you can’t go wrong with Bee. But if you want to be better organized at work, I suggest that you try one of the other three. I’m most excited about Plaud, but it has the disadvantage of requiring you to start and stop recording for each meeting; Omi and Limitless work in the background all day long.

    None of them work perfectly, and the most common problem I encountered was they all either confused who was speaking or didn’t even try to tell everyone apart. Many of my summaries confused me with my co-workers, or simply said “someone suggested” a particular idea. Is that a problem? Six months from now, I’ll have forgotten the context of the conversation and this kind of ambiguity could at times be confusing. But a few days after the conversation, this is a minor inconvenience, and the summaries are super helpful.

    It’s not unreasonable to have concerns about data privacy, security, and the pervasiveness of everyone being recorded all the time, often without their knowledge. This gives me a little pause as well. Even so, AI recording feels like the future to me, and I would not be surprised if lifelogging—i.e., all-day AI recording—were common, routine and mundane as soon as five years from now. In fact, these devices might be the iPods of the 2020s; eventually, AI recording with be built into our smartwatches, smartphones and smart glasses, making standalone AI pendants as quaintly obsolete in 2030 as the iPod Nano is today.


    Why Trust Forbes Vetted

    The Forbes Vetted team has published hundreds of tech and electronic guides that leverage our hands-on testing and research, including audio stories, like the best outdoor speakers and more.

    • This story was written by executive editor Dave Johnson, a veteran tech journalist who has authored nearly three dozen books on consumer technology and digital photography.
    • He’s obsessed with tools and tech related to generative AI, and is the author of our roundup of the best AI writing tools. For this story, Johnson tested all the wearable devices for at least five weeks.
    • When he’s not testing AI wearables, Johnson shares the latest insights on the best pizza ovens after making over 150 pizzas. He has also ridden hundreds of miles to find the best electric bikes.
    • This article weas edited by consumer tech and electronics editor Rebecca Isaacs, who has been involved in tech journalism for over six years. During her time at Forbes Vetted, she’s tested many wearables, from the Ray-Ban Meta Smart Glasses to the Apollo Wearable and more. When she’s not writing about the best smartwatches for women, she’s testing most types of audio equipment, including wireless headphones, wireless earbuds and Bluetooth speakers.

    Continue Reading

  • Real Madrid ‘Brace’ for Turkiye Approach for Academy Standout

    Real Madrid ‘Brace’ for Turkiye Approach for Academy Standout

    Turkish outfit Beşiktaş are reportedly interested in signing Real Madrid defender Raúl Asencio before the summer transfer window in Türkiye closes.

    Defensive woes marred Real Madrid’s final campaign under Carlo Ancelotti. The Spanish giants conceded 83 goals across all competitions last season amid an injury crisis that saw Dani Carvajal, David Alaba, Éder Militão and Ferland Mendy miss extend periods of time.

    One of the only bright spots defensively for Los Blancos in their poor 2024–25 campaign was Asencio. The 22-year-old was plucked from Real Madrid Castilla and inserted into Ancelotti’s backline, going against the likes of Barcelona, Liverpool and Arsenal in the biggest matches of the season.

    The breakout year seemingly prompted interest from the Süper Lig. According to AS, Beşiktaş are in the market for a center back and Asencio fits the bill. The club named the Spaniard its “priority” target this summer, but Real Madrid have reportedly no interest in parting ways with the defender.

    Raúl Asencio

    Raúl Asencio only played 121 minutes in the United States this summer. / Angel Martinez/Getty Images

    Real Madrid recently included Asencio in their 2025–26 Champions League squad and have made no move to offload the Spain international despite his poor performances the FIFA Club World Cup.

    Asencio only started three matches in the newly expanded tournament and committed a massive error in each. The Real Madrid Castilla product conceded a penalty against Al Hilal, received a red card against Pachuca and gifted Fabián Ruiz PSG’s opener in the semifinals.

    Dean Huijsen, Militão and Antonio Rüdiger are all above Asencio in Xabi Alonso’s defensive pecking order, leaving last season’s savior without much hope of playing consistent minutes moving forward.

    On paper, cashing in on the defender seems like the smart move for Real Madrid, but the club nor the player seem willing to explore a deal. Beşiktaş could still move forward with an official bid for Asencio, though, since the transfer window in Türkiye does not shut until Sept. 12.

    READ THE LATEST REAL MADRID NEWS, TRANSFER RUMORS AND MORE

    Continue Reading

  • Home-Based Intervention Drops Blood Pressure in Rural South Africa

    Home-Based Intervention Drops Blood Pressure in Rural South Africa

    Health workers going to patients’ houses and nurses prescribing medications were key aspects of the program’s success.

    MADRID, Spain—Leaning on the support of community health workers (CHWs) and the ability of nurses to prescribe medications helped bring blood pressure under control among adults with hypertension in rural South Africa, according to the results of the IMPACT-BP trial.

    The effort, with or without the automated transfer of data from home BP monitors to primary care clinics, provided a greater reduction in mean systolic readings by 6 months compared with standard care—by 8 to 9 mm Hg, Thomas Gaziano, MD (Mass General Brigham, Boston, MA), reported earlier this week at the European Society of Cardiology Congress 2025.

    By 1 year, the reduction had risen to about 10 mm Hg. Rates of hypertension control—to below 140/90 mm Hg—increased dramatically as well.

    “In rural South Africa in a very impoverished community, we were able to reduce blood pressure up to 10 mm Hg, persistent through 12 months of the study, and increase control of blood pressure by 20 to 30%,” Gaziano said.

    The findings were published simultaneously in the New England Journal of Medicine.

    The IMPACT-BP Trial

    Globally, Gaziano noted, only 56% of individuals with hypertension are aware they have high BP, 31% are receiving treatment for it, and 18% have it under control, with even worse numbers in certain parts of the world where there are greater challenges accessing healthcare.

    In South Africa, for example, the waiting time to see a provider within the public healthcare system is up to 3.5 hours, with individuals having to deal both with travel costs and time lost at work, he said.

    “The staff are overworked,” said Gaziano. “Most of the clinics and primary care clinics in South Africa in rural areas are not serviced by physicians, but by nurses only. They’re extremely overworked with the burden of chronic disease as well as infectious disease, and people living with HIV in particular.”

    The South African government has been interested in lessening the crowding of clinics and moving care into the communities, he said. That has been done for antiretroviral therapy for HIV, and Gaziano’s team wanted to test whether it was achievable for hypertension management.

    IMPACT-BP was conducted in the uMkhanyakude district of the KwaZulu-Natal province of South Africa, with investigators recruiting 774 adults with hypertension (BP > 140/90 mm Hg on two measurements separated by more than 6 months) from primary care clinics. The mean age of the participants was 62 years, and 76% were women. At baseline, mean systolic BP was 147 mm Hg, with 20.2% of patients having a reading of at least 160 mm Hg. Nearly half (46.5%) were HIV-positive and only a minority had running water in their home (14.5%) or were employed (11.2%).

    The patients were randomized to three arms:

    • Standard of care: Participants would go to the clinic, where a nurse would measure BP and prescribe medications, if necessary. Patients would go to the pharmacy to pick up the antihypertensive drugs.
    • CHW-led care: Participants would get a home-based BP monitor and a trained CHW would ensure that it was working and record measurements off the device. Those readings would be entered into a clinical decision support tool. Nurses would examine the data and prescribe antihypertensives. The CHW would then take the medications to patients’ homes.
    • CHW-plus care: This was similar to the CHW-led model, but with a home BP monitor equipped with a cuff designed to automatically transfer data to the nurse at the clinic. CHWs would still visit patients to deliver medications and assess adherence.

    The primary outcome was the change in systolic BP at 6 months, and that favored both CHW arms of the trial. At that time, average systolic BP was 145.8 mm Hg with standard care, 137.5 mm Hg with CHW-led care, and 136.5 mm Hg with CHW-plus care (P < 0.001 for both CHW arms versus standard of care). Those figures were 144.8, 134.1, and 134.0 mm Hg, respectively, at 1 year.

    The rate of BP control to a goal of less than 140/90 mm Hg at 6 months was 57.6% with standard care, 76.9% with CHW-led care, and 82.8% with CHW-plus care. The proportions in the two intervention arms increased—to 82.8% and 85.7%—by 1 year.

    There were no adverse events deemed to be related to the study.

    ‘Robust Proof-of-Concept’

    The discussant for the study, Tazeen Jafar, MD (Duke-NUS Medical School, Singapore, and Duke Global Health Institute, Durham, NC), said an important finding is that the added electronic element—automated data transfers from the BP cuff—did not enhance the BP reductions obtained with CHW-led care.

    “The overall message from this [is] that interaction of humans with the patients was key to improving blood pressure control” in the trial, she said.

    Similar multicomponent, CHW-led interventions in other low- and middle-income countries—like the one studied in COBRA-BPS, which Jafar led, for instance—have provided generally consistent results, with some variation in the magnitude of the BP impact, she added.

    The mean reduction in systolic BP was about 5 mm Hg with the intervention tested in COBRA-BPS, and the smaller effect compared with IMPACT-BP could be related to how care was delivered, Jafar suggested. In COBRA-BPS, the intervention was delivered by CHWs who worked for the public health sector, whereas in IMPACT-BP, the CHWs were hired specifically for the trial and were not performing other tasks. In addition, medications were not delivered for free in COBRA-BPS.

    “I think when IMPACT-BP is scaled up and integrated into the health sector, one would expect to see attenuation of the benefit that we are seeing in the standalone program,” Jafar said.

    Another challenge for wider applicability of the approach studied in IMPACT-BP is that nurses were responsible for prescribing medications, something that is not available in many countries. And it will be important moving forward to move recruitment of patients beyond the clinics, where participants were enrolled for IMPACT-BP, Jafar said, noting that many people with hypertension are not seeking care at healthcare facilities.

    These issues aside, IMPACT-BP was an excellent study that “fills a large knowledge gap by providing robust proof-of-concept evidence regarding the success of this community health worker-led intervention in the region,” she said. “Community health workers are a readily available resource in many low- and middle-income countries, and they can be leveraged upon to scale up the intervention.”

    She added that this type of intervention could have relevance, too, for underserved populations in higher-income countries.


    Continue Reading

  • It’s Stud Budz Season, and Everyone Is Watching

    It’s Stud Budz Season, and Everyone Is Watching

    What is her type?

    “Badies,” she says, offering that she’s a sucker for a girly girl with a nice smile, who can also be “a bit of a bro.”

    “Me and T, we differ on that,” Williams chimes in. “I like very feminine, submissive energy. I don’t need my woman to be my bro.”

    “And that’s good because we don’t like the same girls,” Hiedeman says.

    Neither one is seriously seeing anyone right now, though last month, they did stream themselves going on a double date.

    “But that was just for fun,” Williams says. “That wasn’t looking for love. I’m not looking for no love; T’s always looking for love.”

    “If love finds me, it finds me,” Hideman admits.

    “If love finds me, I don’t want to be found!” Williams says. “On God. The perfect girl can fall in my lap and I’m gonna be like, ‘Yeah, nah, not right now. We can have fun though.”

    It is not lost on them that not everyone feels as safe or empowered to live so freely. “Me and Courtney are blessed,” Hiedeman says. “My family [and] all my friends were super accepting of who I was, so that made it so much easier for me to be me. I know that everybody doesn’t have that luxury. We try to inspire people to be who they are, if they don’t have support elsewhere, because again, I know that path is not the same for everybody, or as easy.” Thus, what started as a way for Hideman and Williams to further connect with fans and monetize a friendship seemingly made for the camera, has morphed into something far more meaningful. Yes, they want to share their fun-filled lives as professional athletes and best friends, but what’s most important, they say, is that that they do so while wearing their gayness and masculinity on their sleeves.

    Continue Reading

  • Federal court orders remedies in Google antitrust case, rejects DOJ call for breakup

    The US District Court for the District of Columbia issued, on September 2, 2025, a landmark ruling in the US Department of Justice’s (DOJ) antitrust case against Google, imposing significant remedies to address the company’s monopoly in general search and search advertising – but stopping short of ordering a breakup of the tech giant.

    Overview of remedies imposed

    After finding the company in violation of Section 2 of the Sherman Act last year, Judge Amit Mehta opted for a measured approach to restore competition and deter future misconduct. Notably, the emergence of generative artificial intelligence (GenAI) as a nascent competitor threat to Google’s dominance played a key role in fashioning antitrust remedies.

    At the heart of the court order is a ban on exclusive contracts and practices that previously ensured Google’s search engine was the default choice on nearly all desktops and mobile devices nationwide. By eliminating these agreements, the court aimed to lower barriers for rival search providers and nascent GenAI entrants to compete for user attention. And yet, the overall effect of the court’s order recognizes the innovations contributed by Google and the desire to not impede further innovations.

    In addition to prohibiting exclusivity, the court prevented Google from tying its lucrative Play Store licenses and revenue-sharing agreements to the placement of its search tools, ensuring device manufacturers and partners can freely choose alternative providers.

    Furthermore, Google must provide “Qualified Competitors” with access to certain search index and user-interaction data, helping rivals overcome the scale disadvantage created by Google’s past conduct. Google does not have to make ads data available. However, the court narrowed the scope of data to avoid overreach and protect proprietary information.

    Google is also required to offer search and search text ads syndication services to competitors on terms consistent with its current commercial practices, enabling new entrants to deliver high-quality results and ads while building their own capabilities.

    Lastly, Google is required to publicly disclose any material changes it makes to its ad auction processes. A Technical Committee will be established to assist in implementing and enforcing the judgment, with the remedies set to remain in effect for six years.

    Remedies the court declined

    The court considered, but ultimately rejected, several far-reaching remedies proposed by the plaintiffs. Notably, it declined to order Google to divest assets, such as Chrome or Android; ban all forms of payments to distribution partners; or mandate consumer-facing “choice screens” for search engine selection on devices. Proposals such as public education campaigns, broad advertiser data sharing, and anti-retaliation measures were also deemed unnecessary or outside the direct scope of Google’s violations.

    Monopoly maintained through exclusive deals

    The case, brought by the DOJ and multiple states, centered on allegations that Google used exclusive distribution agreements to unlawfully sustain its dominance in the sector. The court found that for over a decade, Google secured its position as the default search engine on browsers, smartphones, and other devices by entering into exclusive distribution agreements with device manufacturers, wireless carriers, and browser developers.

    Industry implications

    While Google has already signaled it will appeal the court’s decision, this marks one of the most significant antitrust interventions in the tech sector in decades, with potential ripple effects for how digital markets are regulated and how dominant platforms interact with competitors in both search and AI. Equally, DOJ has indicated that it will evaluate an appeal on the remedies order. A practical effect of the appeals is that impact at industry or consumer levels will not be immediate but rather, possibly, in several years.

    For more information, please contact the authors.

    Continue Reading