Japanese stocks climbed after President Donald Trump signed an executive order implementing his trade agreement with Japan, with a maximum 15% tariff on most of its products, including autos.
The Topix rose 0.8% to 3,106.31 as of 9:15 a.m. Tokyo time, while the blue-chip heavy Nikkei 225 Stock Average advanced 1.2% to 43,109.47. The yen was up 0.1% to 148.36 against the dollar.
Players have become increasingly powerful in modern football and there is no better example than the transfer window.
Every summer, clubs from across the world are held to ransom by their own employees, forced to sell their prized assets when players decide they want to leave. Unsolicited interviews, strikes and social media posts are all contemporary tactics for forcing an exit, with clubs seldom able to combat player power.
A formal or informal transfer request is often the beginning of the end and usually has the desired effect for players, with plenty of high-profile instances of the tactic being employed both successfully and unsuccessfully over the years.
Here are some of the most shocking transfer requests ever.
NEWSLETTER. SI FC Newsletter CTA. U.S. Readers—Subscribe for Insight, Analysis and More from SI FC. dark
It’s hard to conceive of a player more fiercely loyal to Liverpool than Steven Gerrard, but the summer of 2005 almost saw the midfielder’s career head in a very, very different direction.
The Liverpool skipper had already established himself as a hero on Merseyside after guiding the club to the most famous of Champions League final victories—the Reds overcoming a three-goal half-time deficit to beat Milan on penalties in Istanbul in 2004–05. However, amid a contract standoff between Gerrard and Liverpool, the door opened to other possibilities.
Unhappy with how the Reds were conducting themselves in contract negotiations, Gerrard handed in a shock transfer request in July, 2005. Supporters were furious and the club stunned, with Chelsea soon lodging a £32 million bid for the then 25-year-old.
It was swiftly rejected and Gerrard soon opted against leaving Anfield under the scrutiny of fan backlash, instead committing to a new deal that would ensure his Liverpool legacy stayed firmly intact.
Few relationships have turned quite as sour as the one between Chelsea and William Gallas. The Frenchman joined the Blues from Marseille in 2001 and spent five years with the club before demanding an improved contract in the summer of 2006.
The defender decided to strike in an attempt to manipulate his employers, eventually choosing to pursue a move to Chelsea’s fierce rivals Arsenal. After eventually allowing his transfer to the Gunners, the Blues released a statement revealing that Gallas had threatened to score an own goal or get a red card if he was forced to turn out for the club again.
Gallas denied the accusations and ended up representing Arsenal for four years, before leaving for their neighbours Tottenham Hotspur in 2010 on a free transfer. He was reportedly offered a new Arsenal contract but turned it down, with the club’s chairman at the time, Peter Hill-Wood, describing his demands as “quite extravagant”.
Despite claiming that he never formally handed in a transfer request, Manchester United legend Wayne Rooney spoke publicly about his desire to leave the Red Devils in 2010. He revealed he would not sign a new contract with the club as he wasn’t offered assurances over their ambitions in the transfer market.
However, Rooney ultimately decided against leaving and penned a five-year extension shortly after his critique of United’s transfer policy, proceeding to win the Premier League title with the club in two of the next three seasons.
But the drama wasn’t done there. After a falling out with Sir Alex Ferguson in 2013, shortly before the legendary United manager’s retirement, Rooney decided he wanted to leave Old Trafford once again. Chelsea even tabled a £20 million bid for the England international, but were rebuffed in their approach. Arsenal and Real Madrid were other interested parties.
David Moyes insisted that Rooney wasn’t for sale after he succeeded Ferguson, with the forward ultimately continuing at Old Trafford for another four years before returning to Everton.
Raheem Sterling emerged as a superstar from Liverpool’s academy and was integral in the club’s surprise push for the Premier League title in 2013–14, but the forward decided to pursue pastures greener in 2015.
Sterling conduced a 27-minute BBC interview without the club’s permission in April, 2015, in which he admitted he had turned down a new contract offer from Liverpool and was flattered by interest from Arsenal. The player’s agent then revealed that no amount of money could convince his client to stay at Anfield as tensions rose.
Sterling asked to be left out of Liverpool’s pre-season tour of Asia to focus on engineering a move elsewhere and, eventually, he did secure his desired departure. The forward joined Manchester City for just shy of £50 million, burning all bridges with the Reds and their supporters in the process.
In a summer of high-profile transfers and lengthy sagas, Alexander Isak’s future was the focal point. The ex-Newcastle United striker had his head turned by interest from Liverpool in mid-July, with the Reds making an informal approach for the Sweden international.
However, the Magpies were adamant that Isak was not for sale and Liverpool turned their attention to other targets, signing Hugo Ekitiké—a player wanted by Newcastle—for £79 million. Shortly after the Reds signed the Frenchman, Isak revealed his desire to leave St James’ Park over the summer, with Liverpool the only club he wanted to join.
Newcastle insisted that Isak would not depart and the player went into exile, eventually releasing a shock statement in which he claimed the Magpies had broken their promises over his future. The club rejected the 25-year-old’s comments, once again closing the door to his exit.
But Newcastle were eventually pushed to their limit and knew they needed to cash in on Isak to preserve his value. They quickly signed replacement strikers in Nick Woltemade and Yoane Wissa before sanctioning Isak’s Premier League record £125 million transfer to Liverpool.
Donald Trump is expected to sign an executive order on Friday authorizing the US Department of Defense to rebrand itself as the “department of war”, the White House said, as part of an attempt to formalize the name change without an act of Congress.
The order will designate “department of war” as a “secondary title”, an administration official said, as a way to get around the need for congressional approval to formally rename a federal agency.
But the order will instruct the rest of the executive branch to use the “department of war” name in internal and external communications, and allows the defense secretary Pete Hegseth and other officials to use “secretary of war” as official titles.
The order – seemingly in recognition of the limitation of the executive action alone – also directs Hegseth to recommend potential legislative moves the administration could take to permanently rename the defense department.
Trump and Hegseth have been publicly pushing for the rebrand for weeks, claiming the change would present the US military as more aggressive to the world by reverting to the name that was used when the US was victorious in the first and second world wars.
“Everybody likes that we had an unbelievable history of victory when it was the Department of War,” Trump told reporters in the Oval Office last week. “Then we changed it to Department of Defense.”
Asked about the need for congressional approval to change the name of a federal agency, Trump suggested the administration saw it as a formality. “We’re just going to do it. I’m sure Congress will go along, if we need that. I don’t think we even need that,” he said.
White House officials privately suggested on Thursday that they were keen to do something symbolic to mark the 200th day of Trump’s second term.
The US government had a Department of War until shortly after the second world war, when the Truman administration split the US army and air force and merged it with the navy. In 1949, Congress amended the National Security Act, which named the new agency the Department of Defense.
The rebrand to the Department of War comes as Trump has repeatedly made the case that he should receive the Nobel peace prize for pushing for the end of conflicts in the Middle East and the Ukraine war.
But critics have suggested the renaming of effort runs counter to the aims of the prize and his interventions to try to end conflicts have come at a cost, arguing Trump often aligns himself with aggressors.
Additional reporting by Lauren Gambino
Chevron’s reputation as a reliable operator—coupled with its strategically placed LNG hubs worldwide—has helped give its LNG business a leading edge, said Essner.
For 75 years, Chevron has partnered closely with Japan, particularly on LNG supply.
With the Chevron-operated Gorgon and Wheatstone projects in Australia, plus the company’s stake in the Northwest Shelf Project in the country, Chevron is among Japan’s largest LNG suppliers.
“This relationship with Japan helped build the investment support that enabled our large-scale projects like Gorgon and Wheatstone,” said Makiko Matsukizono, Chevron’s general manager for Japan in its LNG origination organization. “This is a testament to our commitment to powering progress and the global impact of our LNG business.”
Chevron also has significant natural gas holdings spanning the Asia Pacific, the Eastern Mediterranean, and West Africa. In the U.S., its holdings range from the Permian and DJ basins to Chevron’s expanding presence along the U.S. Gulf Coast. These holdings position Chevron to support the world’s evolving energy mix and energy security needs.
Long-term relationships built on a foundation of trust between communities, researchers and the natural world can transform science, education and climate adaptation. That is the central message of a study published in Emotion, Space and Society by Scott Laursen, a climate adaptation extension specialist with the University of Hawaiʻi at Mānoa Pacific Islands Climate Adaptation Science Center (PI-CASC).
The article, co-led by long-term Kealakekua residents, cultural practitioners and lineal descendants, showcases a decade of community-driven work on Hawaiʻi Island and its connection to multiple UH Hilo projects.
“When science is co-led by communities rooted in place and guided by respect for human and more-than-human relationships, communities and science innovate rapidly; they drive effective actions, and create lasting solutions,” said Laursen. “Moving at the ‘speed of trust’ has been fundamental to the human condition since the dawn of time. Locating and empowering long-term, place-based networks offers a powerful way forward in a rapidly changing world.”
The research focuses on how “relational worldviews”—where people, places and ecosystems are seen as deeply interconnected—are shaping new and effective approaches to climate adaptation. From coral restoration in Kapukapu to rethinking shoreline management on Hawaiʻi Island, the article demonstrates how sustained collaboration addresses urgent local challenges while training the next generation of scientists and resource stewards.
The publication emphasizes:
The article uses the metaphor of hoe waʻa to illustrate how collaboration functions. Just as a canoe crew must trust each other and stay attuned to changing ocean conditions to navigate successfully, research partnerships require skill, humility, flexibility and an awareness of their surroundings.
Co-author Akoni Palacat-Nelsen, executive director of Hoʻāla Kealakekua Nui and Kapukapu ʻOhana co-founder, connected this approach to on-the-ground action.
“Climate adaptation is a global initiative. Hoʻāla Kealakekua Nui redirected its resources to address climate adaptation by implementing traditional ecological knowledge,” said Palacat-Nelsen. “It is critical to first re-establish the broken relationship between humans and the impacted resource(s), such that we transcend notions of ‘resources’ and instead engage such arenas as the ‘source’ of life. Place-based traditional knowledge employs methods like kilokilo (community-driven data collection), as seen in our Kanu Koʻa project, which focuses on rebuilding resilient coral communities and restoring the habitat for ʻopae ʻula (shrimp) in our anchialine pools at Kealakekua Bay. The practice of kilokilo reinforces trust in the long-term relationship between humans and the more-than-human experiences.”
Other co-authors include artists, NOAA and National Park Service employees, a policy professional, UH Hilo geography and environmental science professor Ryan Perroy, recent UH Hilo graduate students Aloha Kapono and Rose Hart, and PI-CASC’s Executive Director Darren Lerner.
R.F. Kuang In Conversation with Dean Nelson
6:30 p.m. Thursday, September 11
Brown Chapel, Point Loma Nazarene University
Lomaland Dr, San Diego, CA 92106
$43 + tax and fee (includes a copy of the book)
MORE INFO
Rebecca F. Kuang was in the middle of pursuing her doctorate at Yale when she heard people around her joking that “academia is hell.”
“ So being me, I took that very literally and I thought, ‘What if academia literally was hell?’” Kuang said. “‘How silly would that be?’”
“Katabasis” is Kuang’s sixth novel. The book follows two graduate students, Alice Law and Peter Murdoch, on a journey into hell to save their professor’s soul after he is accidentally killed during a magical experiment.
But what started out as a satire of academia, evolved into something darker, as Kuang began exploring themes of mental health, suicide and chronic illness.
Kuang joined Midday Edition to talk about her inspirations for “Katabasis” and the absurdities of academia.
The following interview has been edited for length and clarity.
The reason why hell is a university in this novel is that I have a theory that hell presents itself differently to everybody who encounters it. And we see a lot of this in ancient depictions and myths of hell. There’s a lot of Chinese paintings, for instance, where hell is just a regular courtroom.
And of course, the Egyptian pharaohs were expecting to die and wake up surrounded by their favorite pets and their favorite servants and all the things they liked. So I was really curious that people thought that the afterlife was just a mirror image — a continuation of their life. They knew one possible explanation for this is that the punishments in hell would only make sense within a moral universe that was legible to you — a world that you were already familiar with, but were looking at from a different angle.
I think geographically it is very on the nose inspired by Dante’s “Inferno” — the descriptions of desert landscapes, the barren rocks and the suffocating bogs of wrath.
R.F. Kuang
So that’s why Peter and Alice are in hell as a campus, but actually hell is the state of flux that constantly reconstitutes itself and presents itself differently the further they trek throughout.
I think the point I’m trying to get across is not that academia is uniquely hellish, but for these two people who have spent their whole lives mired in academia, the punishments of hell would only make sense in a campus format.
I think geographically it is very on the nose inspired by Dante’s “Inferno” — the descriptions of desert landscapes, the barren rocks and the suffocating bogs of wrath. All of that is imagery that I was so taken with when I read it in “Inferno” that I put my own riff on them in “Katabasis.”
But it’s actually T.S. Eliot’s “The Waste Land” that is the most influential text on how hell is described. There is this line in “The Waste Land” that reads, “I will show you fear in a handful of dust.” And when I read that, I got full-body shivers. I thought, “This is amazing.” That line forms the backbone of the alienating, disquieting creep of fear that Alice and Peter feel as they trek further into the deeper courts and start realizing that perhaps they’re not alone and something is stalking them throughout this desert landscape.
Alice’s issue is that she’s totally delusional, and I think this is a common personality type in academia. People who constantly believe against the impossible, who are so passionate and obsessive about their research, that they’re willing to overlook a lot of things. For instance, the joke that every PhD student implicitly understands is the existence of a job market. Most of us doing PhD knows that we probably won’t get jobs — there just aren’t enough positions to go around. The PhD is in this impossible endeavor, but Alice thinks that if you just close your eyes and pretend that there’s nothing wrong — that everything’s going to be OK — then these systems of belief are going to keep you going up until the very end.
On a very personal level, the book was a way for me to explore this basic question of why life is worth living and how you get there.
R.F. Kuang
So the key to Alice’s character is understanding that she’s wrapped herself in all these catechisms, these cages of belief that will ultimately fail her and fall apart. And when that happens, she will have nothing to orient herself. So much of the book is exploring how she finally comes to terms with the truth and learns to break free of the delusions that she has relied on for her survival.
I like to write rival dynamics. They’re always so much fun for me because a rivalry is a kind of romance, and there’s so many examples in great works of literature where the rivalry feels more intimate and more sensual, almost, than a romantic relationship.
As academic rivals, Alice and Peter have been forced to pay very close attention to one another. They’re probably the most careful readers of the other’s work. I mean, Alice can recognize every single letter of Peter’s handwriting. They understand how the other thinks. They understand the patterns of their minds, the mistakes that they tend to make or their particular forms of brilliance. That means that when they’re opposed to each other, they can go to nearly deadly warfare.
But when they’re working on the same team, they’re basically unstoppable. That was a really fun dynamic to write.
I find that every book feels harder to write because I’m learning more about craft and I am more attentive to issues that I never even would’ve noticed before. So I think certainly with this book, I was very careful with every sentence, every word choice. I wasn’t like that earlier in my career.
When I was writing “The Poppy War” trilogy, the words just sort of flowed out of me because I wasn’t interested in the art of the sentence. I was just interested in getting my ideas across. Now I’m learning more about poetry and I’m thinking more about the rhythm and the musicality of a sentence. I did a lot more reading out loud of this book than I have with previous books.
I think my ear is just becoming sharper and sharper for the sound and shape of language as I get better at writing, and I hope that’s reflected in the prose.
Oh, I think it’s amazing. I’ve been shown some of these videos and they make me really, really happy. I think in an era of all these attacks against intellectualism and a general dumbing down of culture, the fact that young people are on TikTok telling each other to read the “Aeneid” is so, so cool. I’m happy to have contributed to that in any little way.
Personally, I don’t think that there’s a list that you have to read before you read the book. I’ve tried to make everything very accessible and intelligible, even if you have no background in any of the fields that I’m writing about, because I also don’t have an academic background in philosophy or logic or math. I’ve had to explain these concepts in terms that were accessible to myself.
What I hope most of all is that readers who pick up on references in “Katabasis” then go on and read those texts as well. So if you read the book and then decide you wanna read T.S. Eliot or Jorge Luis Borges or Nabokov or Dante, then all power to you — and I hope you have a really good time.
I think on a very personal level, the book was a way for me to explore this basic question of why life is worth living and how you get there. So I hope that anybody who is in a similar place will find some comfort in the book and also think that the question of life has gotten more interesting.
Here you’ll find a list of hotfixes that address various issues related to World of Warcraft: The War Within, Mists of Pandaria Classic, Season of Discovery, WoW Classic Era, and Hardcore. Some of the hotfixes below take effect the moment they were implemented, while others may require scheduled realm restarts to go into effect. Please keep in mind that some issues cannot be addressed without a client-side patch update. This list will be updated as additional hotfixes are applied.
September 4, 2025
Character Services
Delves
Dungeons and Raids
Mists of Pandaria Classic
September 2, 2025
Classes
Creatures and NPCs
Dungeons and Raids
Items
Quests
Mists of Pandaria Classic
August 26, 2025
Characters
Classes
Delves
Dungeons and Raids
Items
K’aresh
Player versus Player
Quests
Mists of Pandaria Classic
August 20, 2025
Mists of Pandaria Classic
August 19, 2025
Classes
Delves
Dungeons and Raids
Items
Player versus Player
Quests
August 15, 2025
Dungeons
Items
Renown
August 14, 2025
Achievements
Delves
Items and Rewards
Dungeons
K’aresh
Mists of Pandaria Classic
August 13, 2025
Classes
Dungeons
Player versus Player
Quests
Mists of Pandaria Classic
August 12, 2025
Classes
Player versus Player
Delves
Dungeons and Raids
Items and Rewards
K’aresh
Quests
Mists of Pandaria Classic
August 8, 2025
Classes
Delves
Items
K’aresh
Quests
Mists of Pandaria Classic
August 7, 2025
Achievements
Classes
Items
K’aresh
Quests
Mists of Pandaria Classic
August 6, 2025
Achievements
Delves
K’aresh
Quests
Mists of Pandaria Classic
The hotfix notes for the previous patch can be found here.
Office workers are seen reflected in a window as they walk to a train station.
Chris Mcgrath | Getty Images News | Getty Images
Japanese real wages turned positive for the first time in seven months on the back of hefty summertime bonuses, but elevated inflation added to pressure on consumption, data showed on Friday.
Inflation-adjusted real wages, a key determinant of households’ purchasing power, edged up 0.5% in July from a year earlier, the first increase since December last year when they inched up by 0.3%. Special payments, including the bonuses, jumped 7.9%, labour ministry data showed.
“The significant contribution to real wage growth comes from factors such as bonus increases and the steady rise in regular wages,” a labour ministry official said.
The consumer inflation rate the ministry uses to calculate real wages, which includes fresh food prices but not rent costs, rose 3.6% year-on-year in July.
While it rose at the slowest pace since November last year, it far exceeds the Japanese central bank’s 2% inflation target.
Regular pay, or base salary, grew 2.5% in July, the fastest rise in seven months. Overtime pay, a barometer of strength in corporate activity, rose 3.3%, the highest since November 2022.
Total cash earnings, or nominal pay, increased 4.1% to 419,668 yen ($2,848.49) in July, the fastest growth in seven months.
Major Japanese firms, on average, agreed to pay hikes of more than 5% during annual spring wage talks this year.
Bank of Japan Governor Kazuo Ueda said last month that wage hikes were spreading beyond large firms and likely to keep accelerating due to a tightening job market, but there are lingering worries that the U.S. tariffs would cause a global economic slowdown and squeeze corporate profits.