In her much-awaited memoir, Mother Mary Comes To Me, Arundhati Roy writes, “Once you’ve had a rocky and unsafe childhood, you can’t trust safety. I learned early that the safest place can be the most dangerous. And that even when it isn’t, I make…
Harrop, J. S. et al. Congress of neurological surgeons systematic review and evidence-based guidelines for perioperative spine: preoperative surgical risk assessment. Neurosurgery 89, S9–S18 (2021).
Ton, A. et al. The evolution of risk assessment in spine surgery: a narrative review. World Neurosurg. 188, 1–14 (2024).
Bakhsheshian, J. et al. The performance of frailty in predictive modeling of short-term outcomes in the surgical management of metastatic tumors to the spine. Spine J. 22, 605–615 (2022).
Ton, A. et al. The impact of frailty on postoperative complications in geriatric patients undergoing multi-level lumbar fusion surgery. Eur. Spine J. 31, 1745–1753 (2022).
Shahrestani, S. et al. Inclusion of frailty improves predictive modeling for postoperative outcomes in surgical management of primary and secondary lumbar spine tumors. World Neurosurg. 153, e454–e463 (2021).
Thommen, R., Bowers, C. A., Segura, A. C., Roy, J. M. & Schmidt, M. H. baseline frailty measured by the risk analysis index and 30-day mortality after surgery for spinal malignancy: analysis of a prospective registry (2011–2020). Neurospine 21, 404–413 (2024).
Chan, V. et al. Frailty adversely affects outcomes of patients undergoing spine surgery: a systematic review. Spine J. 21, 988–1000 (2021).
Shahrestani, S. et al. Integration of chronological age does not improve the performance of a mixed-effect model using comorbidity burden and frailty to predict 90-day readmission after surgery for degenerative scoliosis. World Neurosurg. 187, e560–e567 (2024).
Miller, E. K. et al. External validation of the adult spinal deformity (ASD) frailty index (ASD-FI). Eur. Spine J. 27, 2331–2338 (2018).
Miller, E. K. et al. External validation of the Adult Spinal Deformity (ASD) Frailty Index (ASD-FI) in the scoli-RISK-1 patient database. Spine (Phila Pa 1976) 43, 1426–1431 (2018).
Adida, S. et al. Machine learning in spine surgery: a narrative review. Neurosurgery 94, 53–64 (2024).
Karandikar, P. et al. Machine learning applications of surgical imaging for the diagnosis and treatment of spine disorders: current state of the art. Neurosurgery 90, 372–382 (2022).
Ghosh, A. et al. Preoperative anemia is an unsuspecting driver of machine learning prediction of adverse outcomes after lumbar spinal fusion. Spine J. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.spinee.2025.01.031 (2025).
Yahanda, A. T. et al. Current applications and future implications of artificial intelligence in spine surgery and research: a narrative review and commentary. Global Spine J. 15, 1445–1454 (2025).
Shahrestani, S. et al. Optimizing predictive model performance in adult spinal deformity surgery: a comparative head-to-head analysis of learning models for perioperative complications. Neurosurg. Focus 58, E12 (2025).
van Buuren, S. & Groothuis-Oudshoorn, K. Mice: multivariate imputation by chained equations in R. J. Stat. Soft. 45, 1–67 (2011).
Pedregosa, F. et al. Scikit-learn: machine learning in python. J. Mach. Learn. Res. 12, 2825–2830 (2011).
Azur, M. J., Stuart, E. A., Frangakis, C. & Leaf, P. J. Multiple imputation by chained equations: what is it and how does it work?. Int. J. Methods Psychiatr. Res. 20, 40–49 (2011).
Hancock, J. T. & Khoshgoftaar, T. M. Survey on categorical data for neural networks. J. Big Data 7, 28 (2020).
Poslavskaya, E. & Korolev, A. Encoding categorical data: is there yet anything ‘hotter’ than one-hot encoding? Preprint at https://doi.org/10.48550/arXiv.2312.16930 (2023).
Gilbert, T. et al. Development and validation of a hospital frailty risk score focusing on older people in acute care settings using electronic hospital records: an observational study. The Lancet 391, 1775–1782 (2018).
Clegg, A. et al. Development and validation of an electronic frailty index using routine primary care electronic health record data. Age Ageing 45, 353–360 (2016).
Chin, M. et al. Comparing the hospital frailty risk score and the clinical frailty scale among older adults with chronic obstructive pulmonary disease exacerbation. JAMA Netw. Open 6, e2253692 (2023).
Pajewski, N. M., Lenoir, K., Wells, B. J., Williamson, J. D. & Callahan, K. E. Frailty screening using the electronic health record within a medicare accountable care organization. J. Gerontol. A Biol. Sci. Med. Sci. 74, 1771–1777 (2019).
Krell, R. W., Girotti, M. E. & Dimick, J. B. Extended length of stay after surgery: complications, inefficient practice, or sick patients?. JAMA Surg. 149, 815–820 (2014).
Olson, R. S. & Moore, J. H. TPOT: A tree-based pipeline optimization tool for automating machine learning. In Proc. of the Workshop on Automatic Machine Learning 66–74 (PMLR 2016).
Olson, R. S. et al. automating biomedical data science through tree-based pipeline optimization. In applications of evolutionary computation (eds. Squillero, G. & Burelli, P.) 123–137 (Springer International Publishing, Cham). https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-31204-0_9 (2016)
Koza, J. R. Genetic programming as a means for programming computers by natural selection. Stat. Comput. 4, 87–112 (1994).
Shanthi, D. L. & Chethan, N. Genetic algorithm based hyper-parameter tuning to improve the performance of machine learning models. SN Comput. Sci. 4, 119 (2022).
Alibrahim, H. & Ludwig, S. A. Hyperparameter optimization: comparing genetic algorithm against grid search and bayesian optimization. In 2021 IEEE Congress on Evolutionary Computation (CEC) 1551–1559 https://doi.org/10.1109/CEC45853.2021.9504761 (2021)
Vincent, A. M. & Jidesh, P. An improved hyperparameter optimization framework for AutoML systems using evolutionary algorithms. Sci. Rep. 13, 4737 (2023).
Salehi, F., Abbasi, E. & Hassibi, B. The impact of regularization on high-dimensional logistic regression. In advances in neural information processing systems 32 (Curran Associates, Inc., 2019).
Winter, E. Chapter 53 The shapley value. In handbook of game theory with economic applications 3 2025–2054 (Elsevier 2002).
Lundberg, S. M. & Lee, S.-I. A Unified approach to interpreting model predictions. In Advances in Neural Information Processing Systems 30 (Curran Associates, Inc., 2017).
Band, S. S. et al. Application of explainable artificial intelligence in medical health: A systematic review of interpretability methods. Inform. Med. Unlocked 40, 101286 (2023).
Yang, C. C. Explainable artificial intelligence for predictive modeling in healthcare. J. Healthc. Inform Res. 6, 228–239 (2022).
Youden, W. J. Index for rating diagnostic tests. Cancer 3, 32–35 (1950).
Urbanowicz, R. J., Olson, R. S., Schmitt, P., Meeker, M. & Moore, J. H. Benchmarking relief-based feature selection methods for bioinformatics data mining. J. Biomed. Inform. 85, 168–188 (2018).
Ritchie, M. D. et al. Multifactor-dimensionality reduction reveals high-order interactions among estrogen-metabolism genes in sporadic breast cancer. Am. J. Hum. Genetics 69, 138–147 (2001).
Granizo-Mackenzie, D. & Moore, J. H. Multiple threshold spatially uniform relieff for the genetic analysis of complex human diseases. In Evolutionary Computation Machine Learning and Data Mining in Bioinformatics (eds. Vanneschi, L., Bush, W. S. & Giacobini, M.) 1–10 (Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg). https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-642-37189-9_1 (2013)
Freda, P. J., Ye, S., Zhang, R., Moore, J. H. & Urbanowicz, R. J. Assessing the limitations of relief-based algorithms in detecting higher-order interactions. BioData Mining 17, 37 (2024).
World Health Organization. Haemoglobin concentrations for the diagnosis of anaemia and assessment of severity. https://www.who.int/publications/i/item/WHO-NMH-NHD-MNM-11.1.
Shahrestani, S., Brown, N. J., Yue, J. K. & Tan, L. A. Developing mixed-effects models to optimize prediction of postoperative outcomes in a modern sample of over 450,000 patients undergoing elective cervical spine fusion surgery. Clin. Spine Surg. 36, E536–E544 (2023).
Kim, D. U. et al. Central sarcopenia, frailty and comorbidity as predictor of surgical outcome in elderly patients with degenerative spine disease. J. Korean Neurosurg. Soc. 64, 995–1003 (2021).
Han, D. et al. Comparison of three frailty evaluation tools in predicting postoperative adverse events in older patients undergoing lumbar fusion surgery: a prospective cohort study of 240 patients. Eur. Spine J. 34, 1741–1749 (2025).
Hersh, A. M. et al. Comparison of frailty metrics and the charlson comorbidity Index for predicting adverse outcomes in patients undergoing surgery for spine metastases. J. Neurosurg. Spine 36, 849–857 (2022).
Song, X., Mitnitski, A., Cox, J. & Rockwood, K. Comparison of machine learning techniques with classical statistical models in predicting health outcomes. Stud. Health Technol. Inform 107, 736–740 (2004).
Huang, Y., Li, W., Macheret, F., Gabriel, R. A. & Ohno-Machado, L. A tutorial on calibration measurements and calibration models for clinical prediction models. J. Am. Med. Inform. Assoc. 27, 621–633 (2020).
Stevens, R. J. & Poppe, K. K. Validation of clinical prediction models: what does the “calibration slope” really measure?. J. Clin. Epidemiol. 118, 93–99 (2020).
Van Calster, B. et al. Calibration: the Achilles heel of predictive analytics. BMC Med. 17, 230 (2019).
Fluss, R., Faraggi, D. & Reiser, B. Estimation of the youden index and its associated cutoff point. Biom. J. 47, 458–472 (2005).
Raj, R., Kannath, S. K., Mathew, J. & Sylaja, P. N. AutoML accurately predicts endovascular mechanical thrombectomy in acute large vessel ischemic stroke. Front. Neurol. 14, 1259958 (2023).
Wang, J., Xue, Q., Zhang, C. W. J., Wong, K. K. L. & Liu, Z. Explainable coronary artery disease prediction model based on AutoGluon from AutoML framework. Front. Cardiovasc. Med. 11, 1360548 (2024).
Zhu, Z. et al. Integrating machine learning and the SHapley Additive exPlanations (SHAP) framework to predict lymph node metastasis in gastric cancer patients based on inflammation indices and peripheral lymphocyte subpopulations. J. Inflamm. Res. 17, 9551–9566 (2024).
Wang, L. et al. Identification of testicular cancer with T2-weighted MRI-based radiomics and automatic machine learning. BMC Cancer 25, 563 (2025).
IOWA CITY – The first test of the 2026 season for the Illinois State gymnastics team will be a…
Although constipation and diarrhea may seem like opposite problems, they both hinge on the same underlying issue: how much fluid moves into the gut. These common issues affect millions of people in the U.S. each year, yet scientists…
Continuing to fulfill its commitment to voters when Measure M passed in 2016, Metro has reached significant milestones for two pillar projects that would transform the way Angelenos move around the County. At the January Board meeting, the Metro Board will consider certification of the Final Environmental Impact Report (FEIR) for the C Line Extension to Torrance and selection of the Locally Preferred Alternative (LPA) for the Sepulveda Transit Corridor Project.
“Connecting the San Fernando Valley and West Los Angeles and extending rail in the South Bay means opening doors to better jobs, classrooms, entertainment centers and more. It means cleaner air and less time stuck in traffic. This is the kind of bold, future-driven investment that carries a region and its people into the future,” said Metro Board Chair and Whittier City Councilmember Fernando Dutra. “These projects represent an important step in the right direction for Los Angeles County’s public transportation system.”
C Line Extension to Torrance
The Board will consider certifying the Final Environmental Impact Report (FEIR) for the voter-approved C Line Extension to Torrance, which will operate as part of the K Line. This critical 4.5-mile project would launch a new age of mobility in the South Bay, promising commuters, travelers and families a fast, convenient 19-minute trip from Torrance directly to Los Angeles International Airport (LAX), while seamlessly connecting Torrance and Redondo Beach to Los Angeles County’s expanding transit network. The project will also create easy transfers to the C and E lines for people connecting to Santa Monica, downtown Los Angeles, Norwalk and other locations throughout the county.
Metro studied three light rail and a high frequency bus alternative for this project. The Board selected LPA was chosen for its efficient use of the existing Metro-owned historic freight rail corridor, which significantly reduces the need for costly private land acquisition and minimizes construction-related disruptions to neighborhoods. And provides new walking paths in neighborhoods to serve as active green spaces, as well as upgrades to existing freight to enhance safety and reduce freight horn noise from nearby homes. This project is also designed to support economic growth in the South Bay. By linking directly to the Redondo Beach Transit Center and Torrance Transit Center, the LPA ensures superior local and regional connectivity. And the project will generate roughly 15,000 jobs and is estimated to deliver $16.47 billion in regional economic benefits over 20 years.
Sepulveda Transit Corridor
Also, during its January meeting, the Board will consider the staff recommendation for a Locally Preferred Alternative (LPA) for the voter-approved Sepulveda Transit Corridor Project, marking another step forward for this major project that is planned to connect the San Fernando Valley and West Los Angeles.
The selection of the LPA follows the release this past summer of the Draft Environmental Impact Report (EIR), which analyzed five alternatives for a fast, reliable rail transit option for those traveling through the Sepulveda Pass. Community members and stakeholders submitted more than 8,000 comments — a historic number of comments — on the future of the Sepulveda Transit Corridor during the Draft Environmental Impact Report (DEIR) public comment period, during which Metro held 10 public meetings in both virtual and in-person formats to educate stakeholders.
Based on technical evaluation and community and stakeholder input, Metro staff proposed Modified Alternative 5 as the LPA. Modified Alternative 5 is heavy rail transit underground between the Van Nuys Metrolink Station and E Line Expo/Sepulveda Station modified to connect to the Van Nuys G Line Station and future East San Fernando Valley Light Rail station at the G Line at Van Nuys Boulevard.
Modified Alternative 5 incorporates key elements of Alternative 5, including automated vehicles in a single-bore tunnel, a terminus at the E Line Expo/Sepulveda Station and 2.5-minute frequencies during peak travel times. It leverages the strengths of Alternative 5 – high ridership, high frequencies, and shorter station construction sites, while avoiding construction of a ventilation shaft in the Santa Monica Mountains. It also offers the connectivity benefits of Alternative 6 along Van Nuys Boulevard instead of Sepulveda Boulevard, which reduces the project’s overall length and is anticipated to reduce cost.
The staff recommendation also includes project phasing to allow for mobility benefits to be realized as funds become available. Nearly all Metro rail projects have been phased. Specifically, the recommendation includes focusing on an initial operating segment (IOS) between the San Fernando Valley (at the Metro G Line) and Westside (at the Metro D Line). The modifications to Alternative 5 facilitate direct connections to the transit network, avoiding the need to transfer twice to access the project. Direct connections enhance the time competitiveness of transit and anticipated ridership.
After carefully reviewing comments received during the Draft EIR public comment period, Modified Alternative 5 addresses many of the key themes voiced by the community and stakeholders:
The preliminary capital cost for Alternative 5 is $24.2 billion (in 2023). This would be updated to reflect Modified Alternative 5. Beyond funds provided under Measure M and other local sources, Metro anticipates the need for additional funding and financing for the project, including from federal, state and local sources, as well as private investment through a potential public-private partnership (P3).
The project is an investment in the local and regional economy. During construction alone, the project would result in 12,000 to 17,000 jobs per year, increasing economic output in the Los Angeles region by $25.5 billion to $42.9 billion, and generating $7.3 billion to $12.1 billion in additional wages due to construction.
Following Board approval of the LPA, Metro would initiate design refinement efforts consistent with the LPA, which includes evaluating phasing, identifying opportunities for value engineering, evaluating the P3 delivery model, and making refinements to Alternative 5 to allow for connection to the G Line at Van Nuys Boulevard. Following design refinements, the environmental process would continue, including corresponding community outreach and opportunities for public comment.
Continuing to Build Connectivity
Metro has the most ambitious capital program in the country. Over the past 40 years, Metro has built 118 miles of rail and more than 20 additional miles are currently in the planning or construction phase. Metro recognizes what is possible when people have a real alternative to driving. These two projects offer the promise of a more connected, accessible and hopeful future for Angelenos.
Both of these projects will also help California achieve its climate goals through the significant reduction of vehicle miles travelled and greenhouse gases. By providing high-capacity transit alternatives, these new lines will remove tens of millions of vehicle miles from our roads annually, reduce greenhouse gas emissions, reduce smog and ease congestion to ensure a cleaner, more mobile Los Angeles County for generations to come.
“In 2016, LA County voters told us, loud and clear, that they want a robust Metro system to transform their commutes and improve their quality of life,” said Stephanie Wiggins, CEO of Metro, “By advancing these two projects, Metro is making good on this promise. These two projects will transform transportation for people from the South Bay to the San Fernando Valley and beyond, improving access to jobs, education, health care, and all the things that make living in LA great. We look forward to continuing to work with the Board and project stakeholders as we take the next steps on these two transformative projects.”
The Metro Planning & Programming Committee will consider these projects at its meeting on January 14, 2026 at 11:00am. More information can be found at: https://boardagendas.metro.net/
Subscribe to get the latest posts sent to your email.
Here at Autocar, arguments rage pretty much daily. One of the biggest ones we have is over the best car from each manufacturer’s back catalogue.
Some of our staffers see the merits of the MG ZT-T 260…while some don’t. Some pick the obvious,…
Scientists have uncovered a new explanation for how swimming bacteria change direction, providing fresh insight into one of biology’s most intensively studied molecular machines.
Bacteria move through liquids using propellerlike…
After further appointments, on 15 October 2001 I was diagnosed with SMA type two. My parents were told I may not live beyond two years old.
The neurologist told my parents he would see us again in the New Year for a check-up.
SMA severely impacts…
