Author: admin

  • Trump Is Betting Big on Intel. Will the Chips Fall His Way?

    Trump Is Betting Big on Intel. Will the Chips Fall His Way?

    The US government is aiming to take an equity stake in Intel in exchange for grants the company was already committed to receive under the Biden era CHIPS Act, according to comments US commerce secretary Howard Lutnick made in an interview with CNBC. The move is part of the government’s efforts to boost US chip manufacturing.

    “We should get an equity stake for our money, so we’ll deliver the money which was already committed under the Biden administration,” Lutnick said. “We’ll get equity in return for it.” Previously, the government was discussing taking a 10 percent stake in Intel, according to the New York Times.

    The deal could help the venerable chipmaker fund its US-based semiconductor fabrication plants, or fabs, which have required billions of dollars to construct and maintain, even as demand for Intel chips has waned in recent years. Some chip industry experts and members of the Trump administration say that keeping Intel afloat is essential to US national security, because it lessens the country’s reliance on chipmakers overseas.

    But analysts and one notable economist say a potential tie-up between Intel and the US government could present a conflict of interest and may not result in the kind of domestic chipmaking industry the administration is angling for.

    “It’s not the right policy to have the US government own things, to have privatization in reverse,” says Stephen Moore, a visiting fellow at The Heritage Foundation and a former senior economic adviser to Trump’s 2016 campaign. “That’s similar to Europe’s industrial model, and we haven’t done that often here in the US, because a lot of it ends up failing.”

    Government Intervention

    The US government has some history of investing in the private sector. Moore cites a 1980s program called the Synthetic Fuels Corporation, a federally directed multibillion-dollar investment in companies producing liquid fuels from coal, oil shale, and tar sands. It was hailed by President Jimmy Carter as “the cornerstone of our energy policy” and had fallen apart by 1986.

    Then, in the wake of the 2008 financial crisis, the US government stepped in with multibillion-dollar bailouts to stop US automakers and some banks from going under. Those funds were issued either through the Troubled Asset Relief Program, in which the US Treasury Department bought up or guaranteed toxic assets, or in the form of bridge loans. Many were eventually repaid.

    More recently, the Department of Defense agreed to fund a US-based rare-earth magnet company, MP Materials, via equity and loans, in order to expand production and decrease the country’s reliance on China. The deal would in theory give MP Materials the capital to increase its manufacturing capacity from 3,000 to 10,000 metric tons.

    Moore says the ideal scenario is that these arrangements between the government and private industry have an end point. “It should be an agreement to own a short-term stake and then divest,” he says.

    But the current Trump administration has been taking some of these public-private business dealings a step further: In June, the administration approved a partnership between Japanese steel company Nippon Steel and Pittsburgh-based US Steel, dependent on a national security agreement and a so-called golden share provision. The government insisted that it have a say in US Steel’s company decisions, including board appointees and future relocation plans. (This deal was also designed to help the US compete with China on steel production.)

    Continue Reading

  • 2025 US Open women’s draw: Gauff, Keys and Anisimova together in bottom half – US Open Tennis

    1. 2025 US Open women’s draw: Gauff, Keys and Anisimova together in bottom half  US Open Tennis
    2. US Open draw: Emma Raducanu faces tough route if she can beat qualifier in first round  The Guardian
    3. US Open: Four women to watch beyond the favorites  The Express Tribune
    4. Past US Open champs Aryna Sabalenka, Iga Swiatek, Coco Gauff and Venus Williams highlight the field  Yahoo Sports
    5. US Open women’s singles tips: Swiatek the one to beat in New York  Betway Insider

    Continue Reading

  • Glucosylsphingosine affects mitochondrial function in a neuronal cell model

    Glucosylsphingosine affects mitochondrial function in a neuronal cell model

    Cell culture

    SH-Sy5y cells were purchased from the European Collection of Cell Cultures (Public Health England, UK). Cells used in this study were between passage 8 and 15. Cells were incubated in DMEM/F12 (1:1) supplemented with 10% human serum (Sigma, UK) due to high level of endogenous glucosylsphingosine present in standard 10% FBS supplemented culture medium. Cell viability was assessed using AlamarBlue™ HS cell viability reagent (Invitrogen, Thermo Fisher) as per manufacturer’s instructions. Cells were plated in 6 well plates at the density of 3 ×105 cells/well and treated with lyso-Gb3/GlcSph (Avanti lipids) dissolved in DMSO or vehicle for 24 h at the 20 ng/mL dose and 72 h at the 200 ng/mL dose. Cells were harvested using trypsin and centrifuged at 500 × g for 5 min, and further washed with PBS.

    Label Free proteomics and deep proteomic phenotyping

    Pelleted cells were lysed in PBS by three freeze-thaw cycles using 37 °C bath and dry ice. Cell lysate was ice-cold acetone precipitated at a volume of 1:3 and left at –20 °C for 4 h, then centrifuged to pellet precipitated proteins. The supernatant was removed and the protein pellet air dried. Precipitated protein was digested as described previously44. Briefly, protein was solubilised by the addition of 20 µL of 100 mM Tris buffer (pH 7.8) containing 6 M urea, 2 M thiourea and 2% (w/v) amidosulfobetain-14. Disulphide bridges in proteins were broken by the addition of 45 µg of dithioerythritol prepared fresh in 100 mM Tris buffer, pH 7.8 and left to shake for 60 min. Carbamidomethylation of cysteines was performed by the addition of 108 µg of iodoacetamide prepared fresh in buffer as before, and samples incubated in the dark for 45 min. To reduce urea concentration in the samples to below 1 M 160 µL of Milli-Q water was added to samples. 1 µg of trypsin Gold (Promega, Germany) was added to each sample and incubated at 37 °C for 16 h. Peptides were subject to high pH, low pH fractionation using Isolute 100 mg C18 cartridges (Biotage, Sweden) and eluted into 5 fractions at 6–50% ACN. Peptide eluents were dried by centrifugal evaporation and resuspended at a concentration of 300 ng/µL in 3% ACN, 0.1% FA.

    Ultra-definition mass spectrometry (UDMSE) analysis was performed as previously described44. Briefly, 0.3 µg of peptides were loaded onto a Waters NanoAquity Liquid Chromatography (LC) system and separated over 60 min on a 75 µm × 150 mm, 1.7 µm Peptide BEH C18 analytical column (Waters, UK), then injected into a Synapt-G2-Si mass spectrometer with Ion Mobility Separation (IMS) (Waters, UK).

    Raw data was imported to Progenesis QI version 4.1 (Waters, UK) and each fraction was processed separately before all five fractions were combined into one experiment. MS/MS spectra in the MS raw data files were searched against the UniProt most recent published human reference proteome database with manual addition of porcine trypsin (P00761). Enzyme digestion was set to trypsin, maximum missed cleavage number was set to 3. Cysteine carbamidomethylation was set as a fixed modification, methionine oxidation, protein N-terminal acetylation, glutamine deamidation and protein N-terminal pyrrolidone carboxylation were set as variable modifications. False discovery Rate (FDR) cut off was set at 1% at both peptide and protein level. Protein quantification was performed using unique peptides only. The resulting protein identifications and quantitative data were exported to Excel (Microsoft) for further analysis.

    The immobilisation and the identification of lyso-lipid interacting proteins

    Glucosylsphingosine and lyso-Gb3 standards in MeOH were evaporated by centrifugation, then glycosphingolipids were reconstituted in 150 mM phosphate buffered saline (PBS, pH 7.4) to a final concentration of 1 mg/mL. Five milligrams of Dynabeads® M-270 epoxy (Invitrogen, UK) were resuspended in 2 mL of dimethylformamide organic buffer, vortexed and aliquoted into 7 vials (blank, sample and a duplicate) at 3.3 ×108 beads per vial. Buffer was removed from the beads using a magnet. Beads were washed with 1 mL of 150 mM PBS (pH 7.4), resuspended in 0.1 mL of 100 mM sodium phosphate buffer (pH 7.4) and vortexed. One hundred microlitres of 1 mg/mL lysoGb3, glucosylsphingosine, or PBS (blank) was added to each aliquot of beads. To enhance glycosphingolipid-bead binding 0.1 mL of ammonium sulphate buffer (1 M final concentration) was added. The mixture was incubated at room temperature while mixing on a rotor for 24 h. The beads with bound lyso-glycosphingolipids were placed on a magnet and supernatants removed. The beads were washed with 0.5 mL of 150 mM PBS (pH 7.4) containing 2.5 mg/mL of blocking agent horse myoglobin and further washed in PBS. Lyso-glycosphingolipid bound beads were resuspended in 0.1 mL of 100 mM sodium phosphate buffer (pH 7.4), 0.035 mg/mL protein from SH-SY5Y cell lysate diluted in 150 mM PBS (pH 7.4) added and incubated at room temperature for 1 hour while mixing on the rotor. Supernatants were removed and beads washed with 0.5 mL of 150 mM PBS containing 0.1% Triton-100 (pH 7.4) for 15 min. Triton wash was removed and beads were washed with 150 mM PBS (pH 7.4) twice. Protein-glycosphingolipid bound partners were eluted from the beads by the addition of 40 µL of 100 mM Tris (pH 7.8), containing 6 M urea, 2 M thiourea, 0.2% ABS-14 (w/v), subjected to in-solution digestion without fractionation and LC-MS/MS proteomics analysis44. Data were imported to ProteinLynx Global SERVER v3 (Waters, UK), protein identification was performed using UniProt’s most recent published human reference proteome FASTA database (https://www.uniprot.org/proteomes/UP000005640) with manual addition of porcine trypsin (P00761) and horse myoglobin (P68082). Protein quantitative data were exported to Excel (Microsoft) for further analysis. Proteins identified were considered to interact with a glycosphingolipid if they were not detected in the blank – those found to interact with the beads without glycosphingolipid bound to the beads.

    Ubiquitinated protein analysis

    Mouse IgG1 antibody that recognises mono and polyubiquitin chains (Clone FK2, Sigma, UK) on proteins was diluted in 200 µL of PBS containing 0.02% of Tween 20 and coupled to protein G magnetic beads (Dynabeads®, Invitrogen, Sigma) at 4 µg antibody/0.5 mg beads overnight while on a rotor at 4 °C. The bead-antibody complex was placed on a magnet, the supernatant removed, the bead-antibody complex washed twice with 200 µL of PBS-Tween 20, then the bead-antibody complex was incubated with 250 µL horse myoglobin (2.5 mg/mL) for 15 min at room temperature while shaking to reduce nonspecific binding. Horse myoglobin was washed off twice with 200 µL of PBS-Tween 20. The bead-antibody complex was incubated for 1 hour at room temperature on the rotor with SH-SY5Y cell lysates prepared as described above. Bead-antibody-antigen complex was washed with 200 µL of PBS-Tween 20 twice, following which antibody-antigen complex was eluted from the beads with 40 µL of digest buffer containing 100 mM Tris (pH 7.8), 6 M urea, 2 M thiourea, 2% (w/v) ASB-14 while rotating for 2 min. Supernatants containing the antibody-antigen complex were subject to proteomic analysis44. Identification of proteins present in the FK2 antibody immunocapture was performed as described in the previous section with the only difference that mouse immunoglobulin gamma-1 chain C (P01868) from the commercial antibody was also added to the database. Relative protein quantitation was achieved based on the amount of mouse immunoglobulin gamma-1 chain C peptide added to beads. Data were exported to Microsoft Excel for further analysis.

    Tubulin polymerisation assay

    The assay was performed according to the manufacturer’s protocol using Cytoskeleton BK011P kit. GlcSph and lyso-Gb3 stocks in DMSO and DMSO buffer control were diluted with Milli-Q water at 10 x desired concentrations. Taxol in DMSO and colchicine were diluted in Milli-Q water at 30 µM. Infinite 200 plate reader (Tecan, Switzerland) was set into fluorescence (excitation 340 nm, emission 435 nm) top reading kinetic mode at 37 °C with a 30 s interval, 30 nm gain and 3 flashes per reading. A black, flat bottom, 96-well pate (Corning, costar, #3686) was placed into the reader for 10 min to warm up. DMSO, taxol, colchicine, and GlcSph and lysoGb3 samples were pipetted in duplicates into the plate and an assay buffer containing final concentration of GTP (1 mM), tubulin (2 mg/mL), glycerol (15%, v/v) was added to each well. The plate was immediately placed into the reader, shaken for 10 s in orbital mode, then fluorescence was recorded for 60 min. The data were exported into Excel (Microsoft Inc) for further processing and visualised using Graghpad, v 10.4 (Prism).

    Analysis of cellular energy charge

    Five hundred millilitres of 1 M ice-cold perchloric acid was added to the cells, they were scraped and collected into chilled tubes. Two hundred microliters of 0.5 M Potassium Hydrogen Carbonate in 1 M Potassium Hydroxide were combined with 250 µL of cell extract, vortexed, centrifuged at 14,000 × g for 5 min at 4 °C and the supernatant collected into a clean tube. This was stored at −80 °C until derivatisation. One hundred µL of 1 M sodium acetate, pH 4.5 and 10 µL of 4 M chloracetaldehyde were added to 100 µL of cell extract. The mixture was incubated at 60 °C for 40 min and the reaction quenched by putting the sample on ice. Once cool the samples were analysed at 4 °C using High-Performance Liquid Chromatography (HPLC) coupled to fluorescence detector. HPLC equipment consisted of PU-1580 intelligent pumps, AS-950 autosampler and DG-1580-53 in-line mobile phase degasser (Jasco Inc.). Etheno-adenine nucleotides were chromatographically separated over a 150 mm × 4.6 mm, 3 µm ODS C18 analytical column (Hypersil) using a 100 – 0% 0.2 M potassium phosphate, pH 5 and 0.2 M potassium phosphate with 10% acetonitrile, pH 5 over a 31-min linear gradient at a flow rate of 0.8 mL/min. The FP-920 fluorescence detector (Jasco) was maintained at 290 nm excitation and 415 nm emission wavelength respectively and the data collected with EZChrom Elite v3.17 software (Jasco Inc.). Chromatographic peaks acquired for ATP, ADP and AMP were integrated using elution times of corresponding standards and were used to calculate adenylate energy charge (AEC) according to equation equation45:

    $${AEC}=frac{left[{{{rm{ATP}}}}right]+frac{1}{2left[{{{rm{ADP}}}}right]}}{left[{ATP}right]+left[{ADP}right]+left[{AMP}right]}$$

    Analysis of glutathione reductase activity

    Cells in PBS were scraped into microcentrifuge tubes, PBS removed by centrifugation for 5 min at 4 °C at 1000 × g, 200 µL of ice-cold assay buffer added, the pellets centrifuged for 15 min at 10,000 × g at 4 °C and supernatants collected and stored at −80 °C until ready for analysis. The assay was performed using ab83461 GR assay kit (Abcam, UK) according to the manufacturer’s instructions. GR reduces GSSG, which in turn reacts with 5,5’-dithiobis-2-nitrobenzoic acid (DTNB) to generate a coloured product (TNB) with strong absorbance at 405 nm. Endogenous GSH was destroyed with 3% hydrogen peroxide (5 µL) added to the sample (100 µL) for 5 min at room temperature, followed by the treatment with catalase (5 µL) for another 5 min. A 0–50 nmol/well TNB standard curve was prepared using a TNB standard and ran alongside the samples, which were added to a 96-well plate (30 µL). A reaction mixture containing GR assay buffer, DTNB, GSSG and NADPH solutions was added to each well (50 µL) and the absorbance read immediately at 405 nm in an Infinite 200 plate reader at room temperature generating an initial reading (A1). The samples were incubated at first for 10 min and the absorbance read again in a kinetic mode with an interval of 1 min for the next hour. TNB standard curve was plotted and a change in absorbance between the initial reading and another time point determined to fall within the linear range of the reaction was applied to the standard curve to interpolate the amount of TNB in each sample. The activity of GR was calculated as follows: GR activity = (∆B*Sample dilution factor)/((T2–T1)*0.9*V) (nmol/min/mL), where ∆B (nmol) is the amount of TNB interpolated from the standard curve, T1 (min) is the time of the initial reading, T2 (min) is the time of the second reading, V (mL) is the sample volume and 0.9 is the sample volume change factor. The resulting value was normalised to total protein determined by the Bradford method to yield GR activity (nmol/min/mg).

    Analysis of malate dehydrogenase activity

    Cells were collected by scaping. PBS was removed by centrifugation for 5 min at 4 °C at 1000 × g and pellets homogenised in 100 µL of ice-cold assay extraction buffer for 10 min on ice. The pellets were centrifuged at 10,000 × g for 5 min at 4 °C, the supernatants collected and stored at −80 °C until ready for analysis. The assay was performed using an MDH assay kit (Abcam, ab183305, UK) according to the manufacturer’s instructions. One hundred microlitres of ice-cold assay buffer was added to each pellet, placed on ice for 10 min and spun at 10,000 × g for 5 min at 4 °C, the supernatants collected and diluted 1 in 10 in the assay buffer. Ten microlitres of each sample dilution was aliquoted out for total protein measurement by the Bradford method. Samples were analysed in duplicates. A 6-point calibration curve containing 0–12.5 nmol of NADH standard was prepared in duplicates and sample blanks for each sample dilution was run alongside. The reaction mixture for the samples and standards contained samples/standards, assay buffer, enzyme mix, developer and substrate. Sample blanks had all the above except for the substrate. After an initial shake the plate was incubated at 37 °C in Infinite 200 plate reader, the initial absorbance measured at 450 nm, then the absorbance was measured in a kinetic cycle for 30 min every 5 min until the value of the most active sample was greater than the value of the highest standard. The activity of MDH was calculated as follows: ({{{rm{MDH; activity}}}}=frac{{{{rm{Sa}}}}}{left({{{rm{Reaction; Time}}}}right){{{rm{x; Sv}}}}}) where Sa is the amount of NADH (nmol) generated in the sample between the final and initial time of reading (interpolated from the standard curve) ({{{rm{Reaction; Time}}}}) is the difference between the final and initial time of reading (min) ({{{rm{Sv}}}}) is the sample volume used in the rection (mL). The resulting value was normalised to total protein to yield MDH activity (nmol/min/mg).

    Analysis of mitochondrial malate dehydrogenase activity

    Samples were prepared in the same manner as for MDH assay with the exception that the pellets were incubated in 200 µL of assay extraction buffer for 20 min on ice. The sample protein was determined by the Bradford assay and each sample was diluted to contain 150 µg of protein. The assay was performed using MDH2 activity kit (ab119693, Abcam, UK) according to the manufacturer’s protocol. Samples were diluted with incubation buffer and together with a dilution series of a control sample (100 µL) were added to the wells to capture mitochondrial MDH2 and incubated at room temperature while shaking at 300 rpm for 3 h. The buffer was removed, samples washed with blocking buffer and the wash repeated. An activity solution (100 µL) containing sodium malate, NAD+, coupler, reagent dye and assay buffer giving the final concentration of malate and NAD+ 5 mM and 4 mM respectively was added to the samples, absorbance read at 450 nm in a kinetic cycle for 25 min with a 20 s interval with shaking before and between readings. MDH2 activity was calculated using the Beer-Lambert law and the dye extinction coefficient was 37 mM−1 cm−1.

    Analysis of citrate synthase activity

    CS activity was determined by a modified method based on the premise that upon the action of CS Coenzyme A and citrate are liberated and Coenzyme A reacts with DTNB, which causes a colorimetric change and can be monitored at 412 nm38. Cells were collected on ice and centrifuged at 4 °C, the PBS removed and the pellet re-suspended in 500 µL of 10 mM Tris buffer, pH 7.4 containing 320 mM sucrose and 1 mM EDTA. Each pellet was split into two 250 µL aliquots, one for the CS the other for complex I activity assays, and quickly snap frozen on dry ice before storage at −80 °C prior to analyses. Cell lysates were thawed and snap frozen twice using ethanol and dry ice and each sample cuvette was prepared to contain 950 µL of 100 mM Tris/ 0.1% Triton, (v/v), pH 8.0, 20 µL of cell homogenate, 10 µL of 10 mM acetyl-CoA and 10 µL of 20 mM DTNB. The corresponding reference cuvettes were prepared in the same way but had 960 µL of 100 mM Tris/0.1% Triton, (v/v). The cuvettes were covered with parafilm, gently inverted twice before they were put into a Kontron Uvikon 941 spectrophotometer (Nothstar Scientific) maintained at 30 °C. Ten microlitres of 20 mM oxaloacetate was added to the sample cuvettes only, gently mixed, and the reaction monitored at 412 nm for 30 min and measured every 30 s. CS activity was calculated using the Beer-Lambert Law, where path length was 1 cm, total volume was 1 mL and the extinction coefficient of DTNB was 13.6 mM−1 cm−1. CS activity was expressed in nmol/min/mg.

    Analysis of mitochondrial complex I activity

    A modified method of Ragan et al. was used to determine complex I activity46. Each sample was prepared to contain 800 µL of 25 mM phosphate buffer containing 10 mM magnesium chloride, pH 7.2, 10 µL of 100 mM potassium cyanide, 50 µL of 50 mM BSA, 30 µL of 5 mM NADH, 20 µL of cell homogenate and 80 µL of water. The corresponding reference cuvettes were prepared in the same way but contained 90 µL of water. The cuvettes covered with parafilm were gently inverted twice before being put into a Kontron Uvikon 941 spectrophotometer maintained at 30 °C. Ten microlitres of Coenzyme Q1 was added to the sample cuvettes only, gently mixed and left to reach 30 °C, and the reaction measured at 340 nm for 5 min at 30 s intervals. After 5 min elapsed 20 µL of 1 mM rotenone was added to the sample cuvettes only and after a 2–3 min wait the measurement continued for a further 5 min. Using the Beer-Lambert Law the concentration of oxidised NADH was calculated where the change in absorbance at 340 nm after rotenone addition was subtracted from the change in absorbance before rotenone addition, the extinction coefficient of NADH was 6.22 mM−1 cm−1, path length was 1 cm and volume was 1 mL. The resulting value expressed as nmol/min/mg was divided by the value of CS activity to obtain a ratio.

    Analysis of mitochondrial complex II/III activity

    The activity of complex II/III was assayed based on the King method47. The oxidation of succinate to fumarate by complex II shuttling electrons from Coenzyme QH2 to reduce cytochrome c by complex III and is measured spectrophotometrically at 550 nm as a succinate dependent antimycin A (AA) sensitive reduction of cytochrome c. Each sample cuvette was prepared to contain a final concentration of 1 mM potassium cyanide, 300 µM EDTA, 100 µM cytochrome c, in a 166 mM potassium phosphate buffer pH 7.4 with addition of 185 µL of water. The corresponding reference cuvette was prepared in the same manner but 225 µL of water was added. 20 µL of sample was then added to each sample cuvette only, gently mixed and left to warm to 30 °C in the spectrophotometer. The reaction was initiated by the addition of 40 µL of 0.5 mM succinate into the sample cuvettes and the absorbance followed for 5 min. The absorbance for each sample was determined by subtracting the difference in absorbance prior to and after the addition of AA and Beer-Lambert law was applied using extinction coefficient of cytochrome c as 19.2 ×103 M−1 cm−1. The resulting values were normalised to the activity of CS and expressed as ratios.

    Analysis of alpha enolase activity

    The activity was examined using an Abcam ab117994 kit according to manufacturer’s protocol. Cells were washed with ice-cold PBS and collected on ice by scraping. PBS was removed by centrifugation at 500 × g for 5 min at 4 °C and aspiration, pellets washed with 100 µL ice-cold PBS, centrifugation repeated and PBS removed. Pellets were dissolved in 200 µL of the kit extraction buffer while incubated on ice for 20 min, spun at 16,000 × g at 4 °C for 20 min, supernatants collected, total protein determined by the Bradford method and the supernatants stored at −80 °C till ready for analysis. Samples were diluted with incubation buffer to contain 150 µg of protein and a control sample dilution series from 0 to 250 µg of total protein was prepared. The native ENO1 was immunocaptured from the samples during a 2-h incubation at room temperature while shaking at 300 rpm. The buffer was removed, samples washed with blocking buffer and the wash repeated. An activity solution (100 µL), containing 0.5 mM NADH, 0.25 mM 2DG, PK, LDH and assay buffer was added to the samples and absorbance was immediately recorded at 340 nm over a period of 40 min with an interval of 20 s at 37 °C in an Infinite f200 plate reader. ENO1 activity was determined as the change in absorbance per min per µg of protein being proportionate to the consumption of NADH in the reaction mixture by the Beer-Lambert Law using the extinction coefficient of NADH as 6.22 mM−1 cm−1.

    Analysis of ATP production and glycolytic rates using Agilent XFp Seahorse analyser

    Sample preparation

    XFp cartridges were left hydrating overnight prior to the day of the assay in MilliQ water. Alamar blue cell viability reagent was added to each well (1/10th volume) and left to permeate the cells overnight. On the day of the analysis cell viability was assessed by measuring colour change and fluorescence of the dye (excitation 530 nm, emission 590 nm) using an Infinite f200 plate reader (Tecan, Switzerland). Fresh XF DMEM assay medium pH 7.4 was prepared with 1 mM sodium pyruvate, 2 mM glutamine and 10 mM glucose on the day of the assay. Following the 72-h GlcSph treatment cell culture medium was carefully removed and cells checked under the microscope for any perturbations. They were then washed with XF medium, 180 µL of assay medium was added to each well, the plate checked under the microscope again and incubated for 1 h at 37 °C with no CO2 for 45–60 min to remove CO2. After degassing cells were washed with the assay medium, checked under the microscope and the plate placed in the Seahorse analyser for the analysis.

    ATP production rate

    Port A of the XFp cartridge was designated for acute treatment of both control and lyso-GSL treated cells with 3 µM UK5099 (mitochondrial pyruvate shuttle inhibitor). Manufacturer’s protocol was followed using ATP rate assay kit where port B contained 1.5 µM oligomycin, port C contained 0.5 µM rotenone/antimycin A. Data were exported into Seahorse Wave software (v 2.6.1, Agilent), normalised to cell viability and an ATP rate report was generated.

    Glycolytic rate

    Port A contained 0.5 µM rotenone/antimycin A and port B contained 500 µM 2-deoxy-D-glucose – an allosteric hexokinase inhibitor for glycolysis inhibition. The data were exported into Seahorse Wave software (v 2.6.1, Agilent), normalised to cell viability and a glycolytic rate report was generated.

    Statistics and reproducibility

    Data from the ATP and glycolytic rate reports and functional assays were exported into Graphpad Prism software (V9, USA) and analysed by a 2-way ANOVA with a Sidak’s post-hoc multiple comparison test for the ATP production and glycolytic rates, and a Kruskal–Wallis test with a Dunn’s post-hoc test for the activity of mitochondrial complexes I-III, citrate synthase, malate dehydrogenases, glutathione reductase, alpha enolase and cellular energy charge assays. Results were considered to be statistically significant with p value < 0.05.

    Proteomics data were analysed for pathway enrichment using IPA (QIAGEN Inc, https://digitalinsights.qiagen.com/products-overview/discovery-insights-portfolio/analysis-and-visualization/qiagen-ipa/). Input variables were set to proteins that demonstrated a significantly altered expression between the control and lyso-lipid treated cells, with fold-change as expression observation. The output pathways were set to those with p < 0.05. Gene ontology annotations were extracted using PANTHER bioinformatics tool (https://www.pantherdb.org/).

    Reporting summary

    Further information on research design is available in the Nature Portfolio Reporting Summary linked to this article.

    Continue Reading

  • ‘Percy Jackson’ Season 3 Casts Artemis, Zoe Nightshade Roles

    ‘Percy Jackson’ Season 3 Casts Artemis, Zoe Nightshade Roles

    Disney+ is continuing to build out the mythology-drenched world of Percy Jackson and the Olympians.

    Dafne Keen and Saara Chaudry are the latest actors to join the Disney+ series, signing to to play recurring roles in the show’s third season. Keen (Deadpool & Wolverine, His Dark Materials) will play Artemis, the Greek goddess of the moon and the hunt. Saara Chaudry (The Mysterious Benedict Society, The Breadwinner) will play Zoë Nightshade, an immortal hunter and Artemis’ lieutenant.

    Keen and Chaudry join fellow season three additions Levi Chrisopulos and Olive Abercrombie, who are playing siblings Leo and Bianca di Angelo.

    Season three of Percy Jackson is currently in production in Vancouver. It’s based on The Titan’s Curse, the third book in author Rick Riordan’s series of novels about the young Greek demigod (Walker Scobell). Leah Sava Jeffries, Aryan Simhadri, Charlie Bushnell, Dior Goodjohn and Daniel Diemer also star in the series.

    Keen’s Artemis “prefers the freedom of the outdoors to the politics and formality of Olympus,” per a character description. “Her immortal hunters are her constant companions, and she has little contact with mortals, making her a bit out of touch with modern human culture. She is regal and an honorable fighter who will stand up to grave challenges.”

    Zoë Nightshade, to be played by Chaudry, is the “loyal lieutenant to Artemis and first among the immortal hunters. She has been at Artemis’ side for more than 2,000 years. She is a strong warrior and sometimes overly serious in ways that amuse the demigods, but she is also a crucial quest member, willing to strive and sacrifice for the good of all.”

    Season two of Percy Jackson and the Olympians, meanwhile, is set to premiere Dec. 10 on Disney+.

    Riordan and Jonathan E. Steinberg created Percy Jackson and the Olympians. They executive produce with Dan Shotz, Rebecca Riordan, Craig Silverstein, Bert Salke, The Gotham Group’s Ellen Goldsmith-Vein, Jeremy Bell and D.J. Goldberg, James Bobin, Jim Rowe, Albert Kim, Jason Ensler and Sarah Watson.

    Keen is repped by Independent Talent Group, UTA, Liebman Entertainment, Goodman Genow and Public Eye Communications. Chaudry is repped by The Characters Talent Agency and Innovative Artists.

    Continue Reading

  • Monsoon floods kill more than 700 in Pakistan, with heavy rains set to continue – UN News

    1. Monsoon floods kill more than 700 in Pakistan, with heavy rains set to continue  UN News
    2. What’s causing Pakistan’s deadly floods?  Al Jazeera
    3. What are cloudbursts and why might a warming world make them even more dangerous?  CNN
    4. PM Shehbaz visits KP’s flood-affected areas as 14 more bodies recovered  Dawn
    5. King Charles grieved over flood losses  The Express Tribune

    Continue Reading

  • Karl Moore Accepts Doping Sanction

    Karl Moore Accepts Doping Sanction

    USADA announced today that Karl Moore, of the United Kingdom, has accepted the maximum one-year sanction for a violation of the Professional Fighters League (PFL) Anti-Doping Policy.

    Moore, 33, tested positive for recombinant erythropoietin (rEPO) as the result of an out-of-competition sample collected on April 9, 2025. rEPO is prohibited at all times in the class of Peptide Hormones, Growth Factors, Related Substances, and Mimetics under the PFL Anti-Doping Policy (ADP) and PFL Prohibited List.

    Under Section 10.2 of the current version of the PFL ADP, the default period of ineligibility for the use of a prohibited substance is six months but can be increased up to a year in certain circumstances. Here, Moore received a one-year period of ineligibility because his reckless conduct—injecting an unlabeled drug that did not belong to him—led to his positive test. Moore’s one-year period of ineligibility began on April 9, 2025, the date his positive sample was collected.

    USADA conducts a year-round, independent anti-doping program for PFL athletes. USADA is an independent, non-profit, non-governmental agency whose sole mission is to stand with athletes to champion their right to clean sport, inspire true and healthy sport, and promote the integrity of sport. In an effort to aid PFL athletes, as well as their support team members, in understanding the rules applicable to them, USADA provides comprehensive instruction on the PFL Anti-Doping Program webpage regarding the testing process and prohibited substances, how to obtain permission to use a necessary medication, and the risks and dangers of taking supplements, as well as performance-enhancing and recreational drugs.

    In addition, the agency manages a drug reference hotline, Global Drug Reference Online, conducts educational sessions, and proactively distributes a multitude of educational materials.

    USADA makes available a number of ways to report the abuse of performance-enhancing drugs in sport in an effort to protect clean athletes and promote clean competition. Any tip can be reported using the USADA Play Clean Tip Center.


    For more information or media inquiries, email media@usada.org.

     


    Continue Reading

  • ‘A Man on the Inside’ Season 2 Gets Premiere Date, First Pics

    ‘A Man on the Inside’ Season 2 Gets Premiere Date, First Pics

    Charles Nieuwendyk is back on the case.

    Netflix has set a Nov. 20 premiere date for season two of A Man on the Inside, its comedy series starring Ted Danson as Charles, a retired professor who in the first season becomes an undercover agent for a private investigator (Lilah Richcreek Estrada) in a retirement community. The second season will see Charles taking on a new case — but maintaining some ties to the people he met in season one.

    The latter fact is evident in the first photos from season two, which show Charles interacting with his friend Calbert (Stephen McKinley Henderson) and the director of the retirement community, Didi (Stephanie Beatriz).

    Stephen McKinley Henderson and Ted Danson as Charles in ‘A Man on the Inside’ season 2.

    Courtesy of Netflix

    Stephanie Beatriz in ‘A Man on the Inside’ season 2

    Netflix

    Series creator Michael Schur told The Hollywood Reporter after the first season debuted that he would “sign up for this [show] through 2050” if Netflix wanted it, and that while that season featured a definite conclusion, he and the show’s writers left several doors open for future seasons.

    “Before the season was even over, we had started saying [a second season] could be this, could be this, and trying to figure out how it would be different and how it would be the same,” Schur said. “… What you have at the end of the season is a 76-year-old man with a new lease on life and a new sense of purpose and a new kind of fledgling career as an undercover detective. … You have a lot of building blocks for future seasons.”

    The new case will take Charles to a college whose president (Max Greenfield) is being blackmailed. The season two description reads, “Who’s making these threats? Does it have something to do with the iconoclastic billionaire Brad Vinick (Gary Cole) and his proposed donation to the school? Charles finds no shortage of possible suspects, but his attention gets diverted by free-spirited music teacher Mona (Mary Steenburgen, Danson’s real-life wife), whose zest for life awakens feelings he thought he’d buried after the passing of his wife. Is he ready to open his heart again at this stage in his life? And more importantly, has he fallen for the very criminal he’s been sent to unmask? Meanwhile, his daughter Emily (Mary Elizabeth Ellis) is inspired by the changes in her father and uncovers a long-ignored passion, while PI Julie (Estrada) embarks on her own journey of growth as she reconnects with an important figure from her past.”

    The season two cast also includes Michaela Conlin, Lisa Gilroy, Madison Hu, Sam Huntington, Jason Mantzoukas, Constance Marie, Linda Park, David Strathairn and Jill Talley.

    A Man on the Inside is based on the Oscar-nominated documentary The Mole Agent. Schur (The Good Place, Parks and Recreation) is the showrunner and executive produces via his Fremulon production company. Morgan Sackett, David Miner of 3 Arts Entertainment, Maite Alberdi and Marcela Santibañez ( of Micromundo Producciones, and Julie Goldman and Christopher Clements of Motto Pictures also executive produce.

    More photos from season two are below.

    Max Greenfield in ‘A Man on the Inside’

    Colleen E. Hayes/Netflix

    David Strathairn and Ted Danson in ‘A Man on the Inside.’

    Colleen E. Hayes/Netflix

    Jason Mantzoukas and Constance Marie in ‘A Man on the Inside’

    Colleen E. Hayes/Netflix

    Continue Reading

  • Huda Returns & Olandria Breaks Down In Peacock Preview

    Huda Returns & Olandria Breaks Down In Peacock Preview

    The cast of Love Island USA Season 7 returns for a reunion special that will clear things up that happened in the villa and all the rumors that ensued after the villa.

    Andy Cohen joins Ariana Madix as co-host of the reunion set to drop on Peacock on Monday, August 25 at 9 p.m. ET and 6 p.m. PT.

    Peacock released the trailer for the reunion special (which you can stream below), with Season 7 winners Amaya Espinal and Bryan Arenales sharing an update on their relationship status and meeting the parents.

    During the preview, Bryan confesses he had a “lapse of judgment,” which teases the cheating rumors that have been abuzz on social media.

    RELATED: ‘Love Island Games’ Season 2 Sets Ariana Madix As Host & Gets Premiere Date On Peacock

    One of the most controversial Islanders of the season was Huda Mustafa, whose appearance at the reunion was questioned. Huda made it to the reunion and was confronted by her fellow Islanders to address the many allegations she has raised.

    Following her exit from the villa, Huda has made some claims about Chris, with whom she was coupled up in the villa. Ariana Madix asks Chris what he thinks about what she has said, to which he says, “I don’t respect it at all.”

    Andy Cohen addresses Huda, claiming she felt bullied in the villa, which sparks more debate among the Islanders.

    RELATED: All Of Ariana Madix’s Outfits As Host Of ‘Love Island USA’ Season 7

    “It’s like I’ve seen two different people,” Chelley Bissainthe says about Huda. “You were saying things like, ‘Oh, I want you to meet my daughter.’ I was excited for those moments but then when we get out, it was like a complete switch.”

    Olandria Carthen breaks down at the reunion, telling Huda something she did hurt her and adding, “You didn’t really speak up for me.”

    RELATED: ‘Love Island USA’ Season 7: All The Dumped Islanders From Jeremiah Brown To Cierra Ortega & More

    The trailer also previews a tense moment between Jeremiah Brown and Ace Greene.

    “I’m going through hell right now, and you’re calling me a scammer?” Jeremiah says.

    Ace also addresses the controversy about Jeremiah’s exit and how much he influenced the group to dump him from the villa.

    The Love Island USA Season 7 reunion will also air an unseen, extended version of the heart rate challenge that leaves the Islanders gagged.

    RELATED: Peacock’s ‘Love Island USA’ Makes Call For “Respect & Kindness” To Islanders

    Love Island USA Season 7 garnered over 18.4 billion minutes streamed on Peacock during its six-week run, according to the streamer. Season 7 also became Peacock’s most-watched original season of all time, with 49% of audiences being new Love Island viewers.

    Watch the trailer for the Love Island USA Season 7 reunion below.

    Scroll through the Love Island USA Season 7 Reunion trailer photo gallery below.

    Continue Reading

  • These Processed Foods Are Secretly Sabotaging Your Diet

    These Processed Foods Are Secretly Sabotaging Your Diet

    Dr. Dicken says that it’s important to consider how ultra-processed foods (especially health-branded ones) are being used in someone’s diet. He uses protein bars as an example. If someone is eating a protein bar instead of a candy bar, he says that’s a beneficial switch even though they are both ultra-processed foods. But if they’re eating a protein bar instead of protein-rich whole foods like nuts or eggs, that’s not as optimal. In other words, it depends on what one’s overall diet is like and the role ultra-processed foods are playing in their diet.

    Ultra-processed foods to minimize—and what to eat instead

    With all of this in mind, we’ve put together a guide to identifying common ultra-processed foods in your diet (you’ll be surprised at what some of them are) and replacing them with healthier, less processed alternatives.

    Breakfast

    The unexpected sabotagers: Protein bars, instant oatmeal, flavored yogurt

    The replacements: Eggs, nuts, seeds, rolled oats, plain yogurt

    “Protein bars and powders can be a great supplement in a pinch, or a horrible excuse for a meal replacement,” says registered dietitian and clinical exercise physiologist Jon Lanman, MS, RD, CEP.

    Echoing Dr. Dicken’s earlier point, he says that it comes down to why you are using them. “If you’re rushing to the gym after work and haven’t eaten in hours, a protein shake or bar can save the day. But if it’s replacing a balanced meal, you’re missing out on a lot of other benefits like fiber, healthy fats, and other vitamins and phytonutrients,” Lanman says.

    If a protein bar is your go-to breakfast, Lanman and Dr. Landry both recommend replacing it with whole foods that are naturally high in protein, like eggs and Greek yogurt (which is minimally processed as opposed to ultra-processed). “When you do reach for a protein bar or powder, check the label. Aim for at least 10 grams of protein, minimal added sugar, and a short list of recognizable ingredients,” Lanman says.

    Another secretly processed breakfast food? Instant oatmeal.

    “Oatmeal has a lot of benefits,” Lanman says. “For example, it’s high in a particular type of fiber called beta-glucan that can help reduce cholesterol. But instant oatmeal packets are one of the worst breakfast items. They market themselves using the health benefits of oatmeal, but they are typically full of sugar, and have no balance between carbs, fat, and protein. That means it won’t stick with you for very long. They tend to spike your blood sugar, then cause you to crash soon after.

    With this in mind, go for rolled oats over instant oatmeal.

    Lanman says that flavored yogurt is also sneakily ultra-processed. While it does have protein, calcium, and probiotics, he says that yogurts are also often full of sugar. Instead, he recommends opting for plain yogurt and sweetening it with less processed ingredients like berries and honey.

    Lunch

    The unexpected sabotagers: Deli meat, refined breads, bottled salad dressings

    The replacements: Chicken, ready-to-eat fish, whole grain bread, homemade salad dressing

    Continue Reading

  • Respiratory Syncytial Virus Immunization Coverage Among Infants Through Receipt of Nirsevimab Monoclonal Antibody or Maternal Vaccination — United States, October 2023–March 2024

    Respiratory Syncytial Virus Immunization Coverage Among Infants Through Receipt of Nirsevimab Monoclonal Antibody or Maternal Vaccination — United States, October 2023–March 2024

    Discussion

    This report is the first analysis conducted at CDC to provide population-based estimates of the percentage of infants who were immunized against RSV in numerous U.S. states and to analyze the timing of immunization. IIS data from 33 states and DC found that during the first season after approval of nirsevimab for infants and an RSV vaccine for pregnant women, 28.9% of infants born during October 2023–March 2024 were immunized against RSV, either through receipt of nirsevimab or through maternal RSV vaccination. The percentages of infants covered varied widely by state, from 10.8% to 53.1%. Only 38.1% of infants who received nirsevimab received the antibodies within the first week of life (0–6 days after birth), the optimal timing for maximum protection.§§

    An analysis of data from an internet panel survey conducted by CDC during March 26–April 11, 2024, estimated that approximately double the percentage (55.8%) of U.S. infants received protection against RSV through maternal RSV vaccination and nirsevimab during the 2023–24 season as the percentage estimated in this report (8). Differences between the findings of that study and those in this report might be due to an overestimation of coverage in the survey (from self-selection bias, recall bias, or limited sample size) or an underestimation in IIS-based estimates of infant protection in some states because of jurisdictional policies and variation in reporting by immunization providers that might limit the capture of all immunizations administered.¶¶ Some RSV immunization providers, including birthing hospitals (those with more than one birth within the previous year or at least one registered maternity bed) and outpatient obstetric health care providers who administer immunizations less frequently, might not participate in their jurisdictional IIS, which might limit the data that were used in this report. Several other recent studies (46,9) also reported higher immunization coverage estimates than those in this report; however, most of those analyses were from a single institution or health care network with targeted interventions to promote RSV immunization. A population-based study in Wisconsin using IIS data reported coverage estimates similar to those in this report (36.2%) (7).

    Several factors might have contributed to low RSV immunization coverage during the 2023–24 respiratory virus season. First, although nirsevimab was recommended in August 2023, supply issues limited its availability in some areas, particularly at the beginning of the season (10). Second, lack of familiarity among patients and providers about nirsevimab for infants and maternal RSV vaccine, as well as the complexity of the related pediatric and maternal recommendations, might have contributed to limited acceptance or delayed administration. Third, cost concerns might have also played a role. Private health insurers are allowed a 1-year grace period before they are required to cover ACIP-recommended vaccines under the Affordable Care Act.*** In addition, because nirsevimab might have been too expensive for some hospitals to include as part of routine newborn care, they might have opted not to stock it. Finally, this report only included immunizations administered during the ACIP-recommended months for most geographic areas (2,3); some doses might have been administered outside those months. Preliminary data from the 2024–25 respiratory virus season suggest RSV immunization coverage among infants aged <8 months through maternal vaccination or nirsevimab increased to 57% nationally.††† Receipt of nirsevimab among infants during the first week of life was more common toward the end of the season, potentially indicating improvements in supply, administration in birthing hospitals, and increased familiarity with nirsevimab use, among other factors. Continued monitoring of when infants receive nirsevimab will be important during the upcoming respiratory virus season. Nirsevimab coverage by birth month decreased across the season, which might reflect shorter duration of eligibility to receive nirsevimab or increased opportunities for maternal vaccination among infants born later in the season.

    The findings in this report indicate wide variation in both nirsevimab and maternal RSV vaccine use across U.S. states and DC. Differences in age at receipt of nirsevimab were also found according to infants’ VFC eligibility status, with VFC-eligible infants less likely to receive nirsevimab within 3 days of birth, the period in which most infants are likely to be in a hospital after their birth. This might be an indication of a limited number of birthing hospitals being accredited as VFC providers. Despite ACIP approval occurring shortly before the respiratory virus season and challenges around nirsevimab supply and insurance reimbursement, in six states and DC in this analysis, ≥40% of infants were covered by one of the RSV immunization products. Another monoclonal antibody (clesrovimab) was also recently approved for use by the Food and Drug Administration and recommended by ACIP for infants aged <8 months who are not immunized through maternal vaccination, allowing additional options to provide infant immunization against RSV in upcoming seasons.§§§ This baseline information from the first season after RSV immunization product approval can be used by pediatric and obstetric health care providers and public health professionals to guide focused immunization strategies for future respiratory virus seasons.

    Limitations

    The findings in this report are subject to at least seven limitations. First, although adult women who received RSV vaccine (Abrysvo) were assumed to be pregnant, IIS data do not include pregnancy status. Therefore, inclusion of vaccinated women who were not pregnant would have resulted in an overestimation of coverage. Second, because maternal and infant records could not be linked through the deidentified IIS data reported to CDC, determining whether some infants received immunization coverage both through nirsevimab and maternal vaccination was not possible. The proportion of infants receiving immunization coverage was estimated by summing the total number of adult women who received RSV vaccine and the number of infants who received nirsevimab then dividing the total by the total number of live births. This might have led to overestimation of the numerator for infant coverage if a mother and infant collectively were immunized through both methods; however, this is only recommended in rare instances and has not been reported frequently in other studies (5,7,9). Third, IIS data do not identify multiple pregnancies (which account for approximately 3% of live births¶¶¶) or stillbirths (approximately 0.6% of births****). Thus, IIS dose data might not fully align with the denominator of live births by state. Fourth, although infants born to mothers aged <18 and >49 years were not included in the denominator for calculations of infant coverage, nirsevimab doses received by these infants could not be identified and removed from the numerator. This might have resulted in an overestimate of the percentage of infants covered; however, this is likely to represent a small number because births to adolescents and women aged ≥50 years represent a small proportion of total live births. Fifth, each jurisdiction’s IIS data might not include all doses administered because of consent and provider reporting policies, particularly among adult populations. This might have led to an underestimation of numerators for estimates of infant coverage. Sixth, 22% of infant records were missing VFC eligibility status, limiting the ability to fully interpret those data. Finally, because these results are from 33 states and DC, they might not be generalizable to the entire U.S. population.

    Implications for Public Health Practice

    Additional efforts are needed to increase infant protection against severe RSV through maternal or infant immunization. Continued work is also needed to increase birthing hospital enrollment in VFC and improve obstetric provider reporting of immunizations to the IIS. IISs provide timely, population-based data that can be used to estimate state-level infant RSV immunization coverage and monitor trends. Preliminary data from the 2024–25 season suggest increases in RSV immunization coverage, and the recent ACIP recommendation for an additional monoclonal antibody, clesrovimab, could increase access to RSV protection for infants in the 2025–26 respiratory virus season.††††

    Continue Reading