WHO. World malaria report addressing inequity in the global malaria response. Geneva: World Health Organization; 2024. p. 2024.
Google Scholar
Rosenthal PJ, Asua V, Bailey JA, Conrad MD, Ishengoma DS, Kamya MR, et al. The emergence of artemisinin partial resistance in Africa: how do we respond? Lancet Infect Dis. 2024;24:e591–600.
Article
CAS
PubMed
Google Scholar
Ishengoma DS, Mandara CI, Bakari C, Fola AA, Madebe RA, Seth MD, et al. Evidence of artemisinin partial resistance in northwestern Tanzania: clinical and molecular markers of resistance. Lancet Infect Dis. 2024;24:1225–33.
Article
CAS
PubMed
PubMed Central
Google Scholar
Phyo AP, Nkhoma S, Stepniewska K, Ashley EA, Nair S, McGready R, et al. Emergence of artemisinin-resistant malaria on the western border of Thailand: a longitudinal study. Lancet. 2012;379:1960–6.
Article
PubMed
PubMed Central
Google Scholar
van der Pluijm RW, Imwong M, Chau NH, Hoa NT, Thuy-Nhien NT, Thanh NV, et al. Determinants of dihydroartemisinin-piperaquine treatment failure in Plasmodium falciparum malaria in Cambodia, Thailand, and Vietnam: a prospective clinical, pharmacological, and genetic study. Lancet Infect Dis. 2019;19:952–61.
Article
PubMed
PubMed Central
Google Scholar
WHO. Malaria: Artemisinin partial resistance. Geneva: World Health Organization; 2025 [cited 2025 Jan 6]. Available from: https://www.who.int/news-room/questions-and-answers/item/artemisinin-resistance
Talisuna AO, Karema C, Ogutu B, Juma E, Logedi J, Nyandigisi A, et al. Mitigating the threat of artemisinin resistance in Africa: improvement of drug-resistance surveillance and response systems. Lancet Infect Dis. 2012;12:888–96.
Article
CAS
PubMed
PubMed Central
Google Scholar
Bwire GM, Ngasala B, Mikomangwa WP, Kilonzi M, Kamuhabwa AA. Detection of mutations associated with artemisinin resistance at k13-propeller gene and a near complete return of chloroquine susceptible falciparum malaria in Southeast of Tanzania. Sci Rep. 2020;10:3500.
Article
CAS
PubMed
PubMed Central
Google Scholar
Juliano JJ, Giesbrecht DJ, Simkin A, Fola AA, Lyimo BM, Pereus D, et al. Country wide surveillance reveals prevalent artemisinin partial resistance mutations with evidence for multiple origins and expansion of high level sulfadoxine-pyrimethamine resistance mutations in northwest Tanzania. medRxiv. (preprint), 2023.
Thawer SG, Chacky F, Runge M, Reaves E, Mandike R, Lazaro S, et al. Sub-national stratification of malaria risk in mainland Tanzania: a simplified assembly of survey and routine data. Malar J. 2020;19:177.
Article
PubMed
PubMed Central
Google Scholar
Conrad MD, Asua V, Garg S, Giesbrecht D, Niaré K, Smith S, et al. Evolution of partial resistance to artemisinins in malaria parasites in Uganda. N Engl J Med. 2023;389:722–32.
Article
CAS
PubMed
PubMed Central
Google Scholar
Noviyanti R, Miotto O, Barry A, Marfurt J, Siegel S, Thuy-Nhien N, et al. Implementing parasite genotyping into national surveillance frameworks: feedback from control programmes and researchers in the Asia-Pacific region. Malar J. 2020;19:271.
Article
PubMed
PubMed Central
Google Scholar
Sarah-Matio EM, Guillochon E, Nsango SE, Abate L, Ngou CM, Bouopda GA, et al. Genetic diversity of Plasmodium falciparum and distribution of antimalarial drug resistance mutations in symptomatic and asymptomatic infections. Antimicrob Agents Chemother. 2022;66: e0018822.
Article
PubMed
Google Scholar
He Q, Chaillet JK, Labbe F. Antigenic strain diversity predicts different biogeographic patterns of maintenance and decline of antimalarial drug resistance. Elife. 2024;12:RP90888.
Article
PubMed
PubMed Central
Google Scholar
National Bureau of Statistics. National Climate Change Statistics Report, 2019, Tanzania Mainland. Dodoma, Tanzania; 2020.
WHO. Guidelines for malaria [Internet]. Geneva: World Health Organization; 2022 [cited 2025 Mar 13]. Available from: https://www.who.int/publications/i/item/guidelines-for-malaria
Koliopoulos P, Kayange NM, Daniel T, Huth F, Gröndahl B, Medina-Montaño GC, et al. Multiplex-RT-PCR-ELISA panel for detecting mosquito-borne pathogens: Plasmodium sp. preserved and eluted from dried blood spots on sample cards. Malar J. 2021;20:66.
Article
CAS
PubMed
PubMed Central
Google Scholar
Snounou G. Genotyping of Plasmodium spp. nested PCR. Malar Methods Protoc. 2002;72:103–16.
Article
CAS
Google Scholar
Some AF, Bazie T, Zongo I, Yerbanga RS, Nikiema F, Neya C, et al. Plasmodium falciparum msp1 and msp2 genetic diversity and allele frequencies in parasites isolated from symptomatic malaria patients in Bobo-Dioulasso, Burkina Faso. Parasit Vectors. 2018;11:323.
Article
PubMed
PubMed Central
Google Scholar
Aubouy A, Migot-Nabias F, Deloron P. Polymorphism in two merozoite surface proteins of Plasmodium falciparum isolates from Gabon. Malar J. 2003;2:12.
Article
PubMed
PubMed Central
Google Scholar
Oboh MA, Ndiaye T, Diongue K, Ndiaye YD, Sy M, Deme AB, et al. Allelic diversity of MSP1 and MSP2 repeat loci correlate with levels of malaria endemicity in Senegal and Nigerian populations. Malar J. 2021;20:38.
Article
CAS
PubMed
PubMed Central
Google Scholar
Ariey F, Witkowski B, Amaratunga C, Beghain J, Langlois A-C, Khim N, et al. A molecular marker of artemisinin-resistant Plasmodium falciparum malaria. Nature. 2014;505:50–5.
Article
PubMed
Google Scholar
Li J, Chen J, Xie D, Monte-Nguba SM, Eyi JU, Matesa RA, et al. High prevalence of pfmdr1 N86Y and Y184F mutations in Plasmodium falciparum isolates from Bioko Island. Equatorial Guinea Pathog Glob Health. 2014;108:339–43.
Article
CAS
PubMed
Google Scholar
StataCorp. Stata Statistical Software: Release 15. College Station (TX): StataCorp LLC; 2017.
R Core Team. R: A Language and Environment for Statistical Computing. Vienna, Austria: R Foundation for Statistical Computing; 2023. Available from: https://www.R-project.org/
Kang JM, Moon SU, Kim JY, Cho SH, Lin K, Sohn WM, et al. Genetic polymorphism of merozoite surface protein-1 and merozoite surface protein-2 in Plasmodium falciparum field isolates from Myanmar. Malar J. 2010;9:131.
Article
PubMed
PubMed Central
Google Scholar
Yakubu B, Longdet IY, Jen TH, Davou DT, Obishakin E. High-complexity Plasmodium falciparum infections, North Central Nigeria, 2015–2018. Emerg Infect Dis. 2019;25:1330–8.
Article
CAS
PubMed
PubMed Central
Google Scholar
Bakari C, Mandara CI, Madebe RA, Seth MD, Ngasala B, Kamugisha E, et al. Trends of Plasmodium falciparum molecular markers associated with resistance to artemisinins and reduced susceptibility to lumefantrine in Mainland Tanzania from 2016 to 2021. Malar J. 2024;23:71.
Article
CAS
PubMed
PubMed Central
Google Scholar
Uwimana A, Legrand E, Stokes BH, Ndikumana J-LM, Warsame M, Umulisa N, et al. Emergence and clonal expansion of in vitro artemisinin-resistant Plasmodium falciparum kelch13 R561H mutant parasites in Rwanda. Nat Med. 2020;26:1602–8.
Article
CAS
PubMed
PubMed Central
Google Scholar
Ajogbasile FV, Oluniyi PE, Kayode AT, Akano KO, Adegboyega BB, Philip C, et al. Molecular profiling of the artemisinin resistance Kelch 13 gene in Plasmodium falciparum from Nigeria. PLoS ONE. 2022;17: e0264548.
Article
CAS
PubMed
PubMed Central
Google Scholar
Boussaroque A, Fall B, Madamet M, Camara C, Benoit N, Fall M, et al. Emergence of mutations in the K13 propeller gene of Plasmodium falciparum isolates from Dakar, Senegal, in 2013–2014. Antimicrob Agents Chemother. 2015;60:624–7.
Article
PubMed
PubMed Central
Google Scholar
Ndwiga L, Kimenyi KM, Wamae K, Osoti V, Akinyi M, Omedo I, et al. A review of the frequencies of Plasmodium falciparum Kelch 13 artemisinin resistance mutations in Africa. Int J Parasitol Drugs Drug Resist. 2021;16:155–61.
Article
CAS
PubMed
PubMed Central
Google Scholar
WHO, Global Malaria Programme. Artemisinin and artemisinin-based combination therapy resistance [Internet]. Geneva: World Health Organization; 2016. Available from: https://www.who.int/publications/i/item/artemisinin-and-act-resistance
Wernsman Young N, Gashema P, Giesbrecht D, Munyaneza T, Maisha F, et al. High frequency of artemisinin partial resistance mutations in the Great Lakes region revealed through rapid pooled deep sequencing. J Infect Dis. 2025;231:269–80.
Article
PubMed
Google Scholar
Kakulu RK, Msuya MM, Makora SH, Lucas AM, Kapinga JV, Mwangoka NK, et al. Characterization of population connectivity for enhanced cross-border surveillance of yellow fever at Mutukula and Namanga borders in Tanzania. IJID Reg. 2024;13: 100476.
Article
PubMed
PubMed Central
Google Scholar
Deane KD, Samwell Ngalya P, Boniface L, Bulugu G, Urassa M. Exploring the relationship between population mobility and HIV risk: evidence from Tanzania. Glob Public Health. 2018;13:173–88.
Article
PubMed
Google Scholar
Malmberg M, Ferreira PE, Tarning J, Ursing J, Ngasala B, Bjorkman A, et al. Plasmodium falciparum drug resistance phenotype as assessed by patient antimalarial drug levels and its association with pfmdr1 polymorphisms. J Infect Dis. 2013;207:842–7.
Article
CAS
PubMed
Google Scholar
Veiga MI, Dhingra SK, Henrich PP, Straimer J, Gnadig N, Uhlemann AC, et al. Globally prevalent PfMDR1 mutations modulate Plasmodium falciparum susceptibility to artemisinin-based combination therapies. Nat Commun. 2016;7:11553.
Article
CAS
PubMed
PubMed Central
Google Scholar
Okell LC, Reiter LM, Ebbe LS, Baraka V, Bisanzio D, Watson OJ, et al. Emerging implications of policies on malaria treatment: genetic changes in the Pfmdr-1 gene affecting susceptibility to artemether-lumefantrine and artesunate-amodiaquine in Africa. BMJ Glob Health. 2018;3: e000999.
Article
PubMed
PubMed Central
Google Scholar
Marwa KJ, Lyimo E, Konje ET, Kapesa A, Kamugisha E, Swedberg G. Plasmodium falciparum merozoite surface proteins polymorphisms and treatment outcomes among patients with uncomplicated malaria in Mwanza, Tanzania. J Trop Med. 2022;2022:5089143.
Article
PubMed
PubMed Central
Google Scholar
Sondo P, Derra K, Rouamba T, Nakanabo Diallo S, Taconet P, Kazienga A, et al. Determinants of Plasmodium falciparum multiplicity of infection and genetic diversity in Burkina Faso. Parasit Vectors. 2020;13:427.
Article
CAS
PubMed
PubMed Central
Google Scholar
Budodo R, Mandai SS, Bakari C, Seth MD, Francis F, Chacha GA, et al. Performance of rapid diagnostic tests, microscopy, and qPCR for detection of Plasmodium parasites among community members with or without symptoms of malaria in villages located in North-western Tanzania. Malar J. 2025;24:115.
Article
CAS
PubMed
PubMed Central
Google Scholar
Mwesigwa A, Ocan M, Musinguzi B, Nante RW, Nankabirwa JI, Kiwuwa SM, et al. Plasmodium falciparum genetic diversity and multiplicity of infection based on msp-1, msp-2, glurp and microsatellite genetic markers in sub-Saharan Africa: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Malar J. 2024;23:97.
When NETL’s Dirk Van Essendelft first met with leaders of the American artificial intelligence company Cerebras Systems Inc. in October 2019, he quickly realized the potential of the company’s groundbreaking Wafer-Scale Engine (WSE) to revolutionize how the Lab modeled energy systems.
More than five years later, the NETL-Cerebras collaboration has racked up an impressive list of accomplishments, several of which were featured during the Lab’s 25th anniversary poster event.
“Right from the beginning, we saw that the WSE was a much faster computational tool — hundreds of times faster — than the traditional high-performance computer hardware we were using to run our computational fluid dynamics (CFD) software,” Van Essendelft said. “Furthermore, it was achieving these speeds while consuming a fraction of the energy compared to traditional processing units. Based on these initial promising results, we formed a partnership that is still yielding powerful results today.”
NETL has been modeling complex energy systems for more than three decades with its renowned Multiphase Flow with Interphase eXchanges (MFiX), a versatile toolset for understanding the behavior and characterizing the performance of energy conversion processes. CFD software such as MFiX accelerates reactor development, reduces costs, optimizes performance and reduces design risk. The WSE could make all of this happen faster and with far less energy.
“We’ve accomplished much in the last five years,” Van Essendelft said. “From the development of a simple user interface that allows researchers to easily program the WSE to setting a world record for speed in several critical models, we’re seeing massive gains in compute speed in an extremely energy efficient manner. We also now have a very capable library to solve a variety of scientific problems related to materials and subsurface modeling in addition to CFD.”
Research using the WSE continues, and Van Essendelft and his team continue to pioneer applications of national importance that require increasingly advanced computing to model complex phenomena and manage extensive data. They plan to continue using the unique capabilities of the WSE to support technologies that will develop American energy technologies and help promote the use of the nation’s abundant, reliable, affordable, domestic energy resources.
NETL is a DOE national laboratory dedicated to advancing the nation’s energy future by creating innovative solutions that strengthen the security, affordability and reliability of energy systems and natural resources. With laboratories in Albany, Oregon; Morgantown, West Virginia; and Pittsburgh, Pennsylvania, NETL creates advanced energy technologies that support DOE’s mission while fostering collaborations that will lead to a resilient and abundant energy future for the nation.
Peshay’s iconic 1996 Studio Set is back on YouTube following a copyright dispute and multiple takedowns.
Sharing the news on Instagram earlier this week, the UK drum & bass DJ confirmed that the 2025 remastered version and original fan-uploaded mix from 2018, which was uploaded with Peshay’s permission to Ambiance channel and has nearly 4 million plays, have both been restored. One of the mix’s featured tracks, ‘Links’ by Chameleon, aka Tom Middleton and Mark Pritchard, has also been returned to the platform.
Peshay has been campaigning to have his legendary mix and ‘Links’ returned to YouTube following alleged “wrongful copyright claims” by Dice Ryu Sykes, who runs the Ninj Yang Productions channel. Sykes is reported to have registered ‘Links’, released by LTJ Bukem’s Good Looking Records in 1995, with the US Copyright Office earlier this year under a new title, ‘Tropical Jungle (Remade)’, and subsequently filed a DMCA claim with YouTube to have Peshay’s mix taken down.
Despite the restoration, Peshay has stressed that this is not the end of his campaign against what he describes as a trend of “abusive copyright strikes on legacy music”. “During this process, we were contacted by numerous artists who have also faced, and continue to face, alarmingly similar situations,” Peshay wrote.
“The fight is far from over. Whilst the infringing tracks, in our case, have been removed from YouTube, they remain live across other major platforms including Spotify and Apple Music. The individual’s US Copyright Office registrations are also still active, and tellingly, their YouTube channel has been restored with what appears to be zero consequences for their actions.”
He said his “management team has been in direct conversations with all major UK music bodies about this issue”, with hopes to continue to fight the alleged copyright abuse. “…The restoration of our content proves that when the music community speaks up, platforms listen. But this is just the beginning. Legacy music deserves proper protection, and artists should not have to fight tooth and nail to reclaim their own cultural heritage.”
A Change.org petition was launched by Peshay last month to help raise awareness of the situation and currently has over 2,600 signatures.
Revisit Anu Shukla’s in-depth report on Peshay’s campaign against “abusive copyright strikes” from May.
Read Peshay’s statement in full and listen to Studio Set (1996) below.
The winners of next season’s AFC Champions League Two, Asia’s second-tier club competition, will receive about £1.8m. The winners of the Saudi King’s Cup will receive just over £1m. Prize money for the Saudi Pro League is not disclosed, but by the most recent available figures (for 2022-23) is in roughly the same area. Weekly attendances at the King Saud University Stadium, where top-tier ticket prices start at about £12, range between 10,000 and 25,000, although of course you also have to factor in pie and programme sales above that.
And so you really have to applaud Al-Nassr’s ambition in handing an estimated £492m to Cristiano Ronaldo over the next two years. Even if they sweep the board at domestic level, if they fight their way past Istiklol of Tajikistan’s 1xBet Higher League and Al-Wehdat of the Jordanian Pro League, if they extract maximum value from merch and sponsorships, you still struggle to see how they can cover a basic salary that comes to £488,000 a day, even before the bonuses and blandishments that will push the total package well beyond that.
Cristiano Ronaldo celebrates scoring for Al-Nassr against Al-Wehda in May. Photograph: Reuters
According to reports, the deal also involves Ronaldo taking a 15% ownership stake in Al-Nassr, extra incentives for winning the Pro League or the Golden Boot, a private jet allowance, 16 full-time staff including two chefs and three gardeners, and a bonus for every time he successfully presses an opposition player. Last one was a joke, obvs. And amid the stultifying assault of numbers, Ronaldo’s new contract – announced to great fanfare last week – marks a significant shift in the evolution of the superstar athlete, a further blurring of the lines between what we used to call “sport” and what we used to call “the other stuff”.
The first question to put: what exactly is Saudi Arabia getting for its money? Because of course Al-Nassr are a majority fund-owned club, an arm of the Saudi state, which is funnelling untold riches into its domestic league free from the encumbrance of cost controls or financial fair play rules. Ronaldo himself is in effect a Saudi employee, albeit one who has enjoyed much better fortune then most migrant workers who have entered the country in recent years.
On the pitch, Ronaldo’s influence has been highly visible: 99 goals in 111 games under four coaches. Give him a half chance in a tight space and even at the age of 40, there are still few players you would back over him. At the same time Al-Nassr have won no major trophies since his arrival and the club’s two other big attacking talents, Jhon Durán and Sadio Mané, have found themselves overshadowed to such an extent that both may leave this summer. Let’s charitably describe this one as: jury out.
In recent months there was talk of Ronaldo getting a short-term deal to play in the Club World Cup, a competition that would seem perfect for him: based entirely around celebrity power, influencer fame and a distinct lack of running. Politically and commercially, there was literally no reason for this not to happen. And so we can conclude that while many clubs were interested in his star wattage, none were prepared to pay the going rate to remould their entire system around a 40-year-old striker who lost his last half-yard of pace in about 2017.
But of course these days what Ronaldo can do on a football pitch is but a fraction of his total appeal. In an age when power itself is being reimagined along the lines of social media clout, when the attention economy and the actual economy are rapidly converging into one and the same thing, the fact Ronaldo is the most followed person on Instagram – and the third-most followed on X behind Elon Musk and Barack Obama – matters. In a way Ronaldo’s fame renders him a kind of one-man city state, an influencer first and an athlete second, his goals and assists entirely tangential to the eyeballs he can garner in the process.
What we have, in essence, is the professional athlete reimagined as a kind of plutocratic demigod, able to construct entire new realities around themselves. One in which the 2034 World Cup in Saudi Arabia will be “the most beautiful ever”, or where the Saudi Pro League is “one of the top five leagues in the world”, as he recently put it. “It’s highly competitive, and those who don’t know that simply haven’t played here.” Fundamentally, this is not true on any measure: Opta ranks the Saudi Pro League as the world’s 29th best. And of course by his own criteria, Ronaldo would have had to play in all the others in order to make a reasoned assessment. But when you have 659 million Instagram followers, perhaps whatever you say becomes true simply by saying it.
Which is not to say the football is an irrelevance. Football is clearly still inherent to Ronaldo’s self-image, albeit these days more as an adjunct to his power than as the source of it. Ronaldo still plays football in the same way that Donald Trump plays golf: as part of a broader cult of personality, something to get photographed doing, content for the feed. A branding exercise stripped entirely of context or objective judgment, complete with massaged numbers and a coterie of obedient applauding acolytes. As is the continuing fixation on his physique, the positioning of Ronaldo as a kind of Übermensch, a transcendent individual, a higher form of biology, albeit one that still possesses an unerring ability to put free-kicks straight into the wall.
skip past newsletter promotion
after newsletter promotion
And so Al-Nassr (and to a lesser extent the Portuguese national team) are no longer paying for Ronaldo the footballer. What they’re buying is Ronaldo the spiritual leader, the attention machine, the aura, the abdominals, the soft-power influence. They’re buying a place on his grid, the opportunity to allow one of the world’s most famous men to do their bidding. Perhaps it helps to think of his new contract as a kind of trade deal, a strategic alliance between two cynical regimes drunk on their own power and with largely congruent social views.
A billboard welcomes Cristiano Ronaldo to Saudi Arabia after he joined Al-Nassr at the end of December 2022. Photograph: Amr Nabil/AP
“I belong to Saudi Arabia,” Ronaldo stated proudly on announcing his new contract last week. And of course many star athletes in many sports have succumbed to the lure of the Saudi riyal, and will continue to do so. But there is a tonal difference between taking the money of a rogue state and actively advocating for them on the broadest possible stage. For years we have spoken of Saudi investment as a kind of moral dilemma, a fine balance of pecuniary motives, reputational concerns and human rights. For Ronaldo, it is clear that no such dilemma exists.
Do you have an opinion on the issues raised in this article? If you would like to submit a response of up to 300 words by email to be considered for publication in our letters section, please click here.
Gracie Abrams had never set foot at Glastonbury before this year, but you couldn’t tell: the 25-year-old singer navigated the weekend at Worthy Farm like a seasoned pro, watching her friends Olivia Rodrigo and Charli XCX perform (she even stepped in as Charli’s “Apple” girl for the night), and dancing on the shoulders of Paul Mescal, all while nailing effortlessly cool festival fashion (Adidas trackpants and a nice top are officially a look). “I hear that [Glastonbury] is the mecca of community and culture and music and belonging, and I am really about that, so 100% of me is excited,” Abrams told Vogue ahead of the festival. It probably didn’t hurt that she’s also a fan of camping: “I like waking up with my friends.”
Off the back of her mega hit “That’s So True” topping the UK charts for eight weeks, it was perhaps no surprise that Abrams took to the stage—in a crimson Rodarte dress—to find an enormous, bandana-clad crowd waiting for her (with Sir Paul McCartney, no less, watching from side of stage), ready to sing along with every word. As for her pre-show ritual? “We always do a big huddle with the band and crew. Occasionally someone will share their secret of the day. We chant a bit. Very sweet and very grounding.”
Below, Gracie Abrams shares her Glastonbury camera roll with Vogue.
ISLAMABAD, Jul 01 (APP):In a series of consecutive meetings, the Judicial Commission of Pakistan has finalized nominations for appointment of the Chief Justices of four High Courts i.e Peshawar, Baluchistan, Sindh and Islamabad.
The JCP, in separate meetings held Tuesday at the Supreme Court premises, with majority votes of the total membership, nominated Mr. Justice S.M. Attique Shah, Acting Chief Justice of Peshawar High Court, as Chief Justice of the Peshawar High Court, Mr. Justice Rozi Khan Barrech, Acting Chief Justice of the High Court of Balochistan, as Chief Justice of the High Court of Balochistan, Mr. Justice Muhammad Junaid Ghaffar, Acting Chief Justice of the High Court of Sindh, as Chief Justice of the High Court of Sindh and Mr. Justice Sardar Muhammad Sarfraz Dogar, Acting Chief Justice of Islamabad High Court, as Chief Justice of Islamabad High Court.
Holders Bordeaux-Begles and last season’s finalists Northampton Saints have been drawn in Pool 4 for the 2025-26 Investec Champions Cup.
In May, Bordeaux defeated Saints 28-20 in Cardiff to lift their first Champions Cup title.
Premiership semi-finalists Bristol Bears, Scarlets, Top 14 side Pau and United Rugby Championship (URC) runners-up Bulls are also in Pool 4.
Three-time winners Saracens are in Pool 1 alongside record six-time champions Toulouse.
They are joined by Glasgow Warriors, Sale Sharks, Clermont Auvergne and South African side Sharks.
Premiership champions Bath, who won last year’s Challenge Cup, are in Pool 2 with Munster, Gloucester, Edinburgh, Castres and three-time winners Toulon.
In Pool 3, Leinster, who lost to Northampton in last year’s semi final, again are drawn in the same pool as Ronan O’Gara’s La Rochelle, who defeated the Irish province in back-to-back finals in 2022 and 2023.
Leo Cullen’s team squeezed past the Top 14 side 16-14 in last year’s pool stage.
Leicester Tigers and Harlequins are also in Pool 3, with Bayonne and South African side Stormers.
Each team will play four different opponents in the pool stage, but not teams from their own league, with fixtures still to be announced.
In the Challenge Cup, Ulster, who finished 14th in last season’s URC have been drawn in the same pool as Parisian rivals Racing 92 and Stade Francais in Pool 3.
Ospreys and Connacht have a kinder draw in Pool 1, which contains Georgian side Black Lion.
Senate Republicans on Tuesday passed Donald Trump’s massive tax and spending bill after spending all night voting on amendments. The bill, which the GOP has dubbed the One Big Beautiful Bill Act, now returns to the House of Representatives, which passed their version last month, before a Friday deadline the president has imposed for the legislation to be on his desk.
Extending big tax cuts
After taking office in 2017, Trump signed the Tax Cuts and Jobs Act, which lowered taxes and increased the standard deduction for all taxpayers, but generally benefited high earners more than most. Those provisions are set to expire after this year, but the “big, beautiful bill” makes them permanent, while increasing the standard deduction by $1,000 for individuals, $1,500 for heads of households and $2,000 for married couples, albeit only through 2028.
Cutting tax on tips or overtime
The bill has an array of new tax write-offs – but only while Trump is president. Several of the new exemptions stem from promises Trump made while campaigning last year. Taxpayers will be able to write off income from tips and overtime, and interest made on loans to purchase cars assembled in the United States. People aged 65 and over are eligible for an additional deduction of $6,000, provided their adjusted gross income does not exceed $75,000 for single filers or $150,000 for couples. But all of these incentives expire at the end of 2028, right before Trump’s term as president ends.
Money for mass deportations and a border wall
As part of Trump’s plan to remove undocumented immigrants from the country, Immigration and Customs Enforcement (Ice) will receive $45bn for detention facilities, $14bn for deportation operations and billions of dollars more to hire an additional 10,000 new agents by 2029. More than $50bn is allocated for the construction of new border fortifications, which will probably include a wall along the border with Mexico.
Slashing Medicaid and food stamps
Republicans have attempted to cut down on the bill’s cost by slashing two major federal safety-net programs: Medicaid, which provides healthcare to poor and disabled Americans, and the Supplemental Nutrition Assistance Program (Snap), which helps people afford groceries. Both are in for funding cuts, as well as new work requirements. The left-leaning Center on Budget and Policy Priorities estimates the Medicaid changes could cost as many as 10.6 million people their healthcare, and about eight million people, or one in five recipients, their Snap benefits.
Cuts to green energy
The bill will phase out many tax incentives created by Congress during Joe Biden’s presidency meant to encourage consumers and businesses to use electric vehicles and other clean-energy technology. Credits for cleaner cars will end this year, as will subsidies for Americans seeking to upgrade their homes to cleaner or more energy-efficient appliances. While a draft of the bill targeted wind- and solar-energy projects with a new excise tax, senators voted to remove that at the last minute.
State and local tax relief (Salt)
One of the thorniest issues the bill addresses is how much relief to provide from state and local taxes (Salt), which many Americans must also pay in addition to their federal tax. Several House Republicans representing districts in Democratic-led states withheld their support from the bill until the Salt deductibility cap was raised from $10,000 to $40,000, but Senate Republicans made clear they would change that. The Senate’s version keeps the $40,000 cap, but only through 2028.
Raising the debt ceiling
The bill will increase the US government’s authority to borrow, known as the debt limit, by $5tn. The US treasury secretary, Scott Bessent, has predicted the government will hit the limit by August, at which point it could default on its debt and spark a financial crisis.
More benefits for the rich than the poor
Wealthier taxpayers appear set to receive more benefits from this bill than poorer ones, according to the Budget Lab at Yale University. Taxpayers in the lowest-income quintile will see a 2.5% decrease in their incomes, largely due to the Snap and Medicaid cuts, while the highest earners will see their incomes grow by 2.4%, the Budget Lab estimated. The impact could change based on which amendments the Senate adopts.
A huge price tag
Despite the GOP’s attempts to use the bill as a vehicle to rein in government spending, the bill would increase the deficit by $3.3tn through 2034, according to the non-partisan Congressional Budget Office. Most of that price tag is the extension of the 2017 tax cuts. The heavy budgetary impact could complicate the bill’s chances of passing the House, where fiscal hardliners have demanded budget-deficit reductions.
