Author: admin

  • NYT Strands Today: Hints, Answers & Spangram for August 3, 2025

    NYT Strands Today: Hints, Answers & Spangram for August 3, 2025

    If you are finding it hard to spot theme words in today’s puzzle, then you are in serious need of the Strands hints below. Those bored with sensational games like Wordle and Connections are turning their attention to Strands for a challenging new experience. If you happen to be one of them and are struggling with NYT Strands, we can get you sorted. So, to help you out, we have added the Strands hints, answers, and Spangram on Sunday, August 3, 2025, below.

    What is NYT Strands?

    NYT Strands is a word game created by The New York Times as part of its growing “Games” library. The aim of this New York Times game is to connect letters in a six-by-eight grid to form a bunch of words that share the same theme.

    To get you started, the puzzle will give you a theme for today’s NYT Strands. You can use it to form multiple “theme” words which will be relevant to this theme, along with one “special” word called the Spangram. This is a word or phrase that spans the length of the grid, vertically, horizontally, or diagonally, giving you the key to crack the rest of the Strands theme words.

    The theme for today’s Strands can be relevant in many different ways. So, the puzzle keeps you on your toes every day with its intriguing set of theme words and Spangrams.

    NYT Strands Hints for Today’s Theme: “Sorry, didn’t catch that”

    The theme for today’s Strands on August 3, 2025, is — “Sorry, didn’t catch that”.

    If you can’t figure out answers for today’s puzzle, here’s a quick Strands hint — what do you call a missed catch or a bad pass during a game?

    Here are hints for a couple of Strands theme words to make it easy for you to solve today’s puzzle on your own without having to scroll down to view the answers:

    • Hint #1: a situation when a computer program outputs incorrect results.
    • Hint #2: another name for a gag reel.

    NYT Strands Spangram Hint: Is It Vertical or Horizontal?

    The Spangram for today’s Strands on August 3, 2025, is mostly HORIZONTAL. It starts with the letters “SP”.

    The hint for today’s Spangram for Strands — a mistake, blunder, or a moment of foolishness that occurs during a competitive game.

    Spoiler Warning:

    Scroll past this point AT YOUR OWN RISK. Hints and answers for today’s Strands below.

    Today’s NYT Strands Answers for August 3, 2025

    Today’s Strands Spangram Answer

    The Spangram answer for today’s Strands on August 3, 2025, is — SportsGoof.

    All Theme Words in Today’s Strands

    Still looking for the theme words to get the answers for today’s NYT Strands? You can check them out below:

    • WHIFF
    • MUFF
    • ERROR
    • FAULT
    • BOBBLE
    • FUMBLE
    • BLOOPER
    Image Credit: NYT Games (screenshot by Ajaay Srinivasan/ Beebom)

    The answers for today’s Strands were pretty easy. I started with the first set of theme words – WHIFF and MUFF, which gave me a good idea on what the theme for today’s Strands might be about. As soon as I spotted GOOF, I was able to find the Spangram and solve the rest of the theme words.

    What is NYT Strands Spangram and How Does It Work?

    Every NYT Strands puzzle consists of a unique word or phrase that’s called the Spangram. This word or set of words will run the length of two opposite sides of the grid. One thing to note here is that, a Spangram doesn’t necessarily have to originate or end at the edge of the grid.

    In its essence, the Spangram is kind of like a bigger hint that sums up today’s Strands theme in just a word or two. Since it spans across two sides of the puzzle, solving it early helps you figure out the rest of the theme words and vice versa.

    Tips and Tricks for Mastering NYT Strands Puzzles

    Solving an NYT Strands puzzle successfully isn’t that hard in itself, but in some cases, the approach might not be as straightforward as it looks. So, here are simple tips and tricks that we suggest you follow to crack the theme words and Spangram for Strands puzzles:

    • Always start at the corners: No two puzzles are the same. But the chances of the Spangram extending to a diagonal form are quite low. So, the best strategy is to find and decrypt relevant words that are at the corners of the grid.
    • Don’t be ashamed to get hints: Sometimes, a theme word could be all you need to solve the entire puzzle. If that requires getting a hint using non-theme words, then that’s the first thing you should do. After all, the point is to have fun and figure this out, like all of us.
    • Think both literally and figuratively: Not all themes may land you in the same sense of thought. Some puzzles may welcome more clever answers that may convey something totally different from their actual meaning.
    • Aim for the Spangram: The Spangram is what splits the Strands board in half. So, figuring it out will help you cross out other potential approaches for a theme. Deciphering even half of the Spangram can get you close to the rest of the answers.

    Still finding it difficult to master the art of NYT Strands? Follow our guide and learn how to play Strands, along with more helpful tips and tricks.

    What is the NYT strands theme for August 3, 2025?

    The theme for today’s NYT strands puzzle is – “Sorry, didn’t catch that”.

    What are the NYT strands hints and answers for August 2, 2025?

    Today’s Strands puzzle is mostly HORIZONTAL, and the answers include different ways to describe a person who is known to make frequent mistakes. The Spangram answer for today’s Strands puzzle is — SportsGoof.

    What was yesterday’s NYT strands answer?

    The answer to yesterday’s NYT strands puzzle was – PhotoEditor and you can find the NYT Strands hints for August 2 here.

    Ajaay Srinivasan

    Ajaay’s love affair with technology started young, with the Nokia N-Gage piquing his interest. Since 2016, he’s channeled his passion for tech into crafting explainers and guides on iOS, macOS, Android, social media, privacy & cybersecurity, and AI. When it’s time to unplug, Ajaay enjoys playing EAFC, unwinding to music on a pair of open-backs, building his dream audiophile gear, or watching Arsenal struggle to keep a clean sheet.


    Continue Reading

  • MTG Final Fantasy card gets 109% price spike by offering powerful mana fixing

    MTG Final Fantasy card gets 109% price spike by offering powerful mana fixing

    This unassuming Magic: The Gathering Final Fantasy card has enjoyed a significant price spike thanks to its ability to help aggressive players get the early-game mana they need.

    The valuation for Starting Town, a rare from MTG’s Final Fantasy set, has risen by 109%, according to MTGGoldfish. The card is now valued at $34 (£25.60), more than twice its value at the start of the week.

    Resource management is a key element of Magic: The Gathering, as anyone who’s ever had too few (or too many) lands in hand will tell you. Starting Town boasts the rare ability to provide mana of any colour for players, at the cost of a single point of life. This means that aggressive decks with more than one colour can steeply benefit from lands like Starting Town, which will allow them to make powerful plays at the start of the game, no matter the colour of the card they’re casting.

    Starting Town is a common staple on decklists across Standard (one of MTG’s most played and competitive formats), highlighting the strength of aggro decks in the current metagame. For instance, both of the leading red and blue aggro decks on MTGGoldfish make ample use of the land. However, due to the card’s consistent performance, slower decks across the meta are also making ample use of Starting Town. Despite the card coming into play tapped after the third turn of the game, the sheer amount of versatility it offers more than makes up for this drawback.

    Though classic so-called ‘pain lands’ like City of Brass lack this drawback, the utility on offer with Starting Town is more than enough to make any deckbuilder turn their head. Unfortunately, this price hike will also play a role in raising the bar of accessibility to the Standard format – a bar which was already prohibitively high to begin with.

    Looking to make some trades? Check out the Wargamer community Discord.

    Continue Reading

  • Pakistan, Iran reaffirm commitment to boost defence ties – Samaa TV

    1. Pakistan, Iran reaffirm commitment to boost defence ties  Samaa TV
    2. Ishaq Dar, Iranian FM Discuss Strengthening Pak-Iran Ties  ptv.com.pk
    3. Two-state solution ‘the only answer,’ Pakistan’s deputy prime minister says ahead of landmark conference in New York  Arab News
    4. Pakistan, BD vow to deepen bilateral ties  The Express Tribune
    5. Pakistan urges full UN membership for Palestine, offers support in rebuilding  Geo.tv

    Continue Reading

  • ENG vs IND: Mohammed Siraj outsmarts Zak Crawley with clever setup before stumps

    ENG vs IND: Mohammed Siraj outsmarts Zak Crawley with clever setup before stumps

    India fast bowler Mohammed Siraj ended Day 3 of the fifth Test against England on a high as he got the prized scalp of Zak Crawley just before stumps at the Oval. Set a target of 374 runs in the fourth innings, England once again off to a terrific start as openers Zak Crawley and Ben Duckett added 50 runs for the first wicket.

    With England just two balls away from going into Day 4 without losing any wickets, Siraj decided to bluff Crawley as he brought deep square leg out on the boundary to give an indication of bowling a short delivery. However, he caught the England opener off guard with a yorker, which shattered into his stumps.

    ENG vs IND 5th Test Day 3 Updates

    As a result, India got the priceless wicket on the verge of stumps and ended a dominating day on a high. The smart work by captain Shubman Gill and Siraj also earned praise from Cheteshwar Pujara, who hailed them for their marvellous plan.

    “He had a deep square leg for Zak Crawley, who was expecting a short ball, and suddenly he bowls a yorker, which was very pleasing to see. When you outsmart a batter, that’s the best feeling one can have as a bowler. And on that occasion, Crawley didn’t have any clue where the ball was coming. He missed that ball completely, but credit goes to Mohammed Siraj because he works hard on his bowling. He’s always in the action, whether he’s bowling with the new ball or the old ball,” said Pujara on Sony Sports.

    Furthermore, Pujara hailed Siraj for bowling his heart out for the team on the tour and rising to the occasion whenever needed.

    “He’s the guy who deserves it, he bowls longer spells and is always there for the team. He has a character, and bowls his heart out. It’s never easy because if you are a fast bowler, bowling in overseas conditions, playing all five test matches, and still to have that energy and efficiency to bowl longer spells and to do it for the country, it’s a great moment for him,” he added.

    Legendary India batter Sunil Gavaskar also praised Gill for his plan at the end of the day’s play.

    “That last move was fantastic, sending a fielder there and bowling a yorker,” said Gavaskar in a video shared by Sony Sports.

    Meanwhile, Siraj’s late strike left England at 50/1 needing another 324 runs to win the Test match. Earlier, India scored 396 in their second innings to take a massive 373-run lead courtesy of a splendid hundred from Yashasvi Jaiswal (118) and half-centuries from Akash Deep (66), Ravindra Jadeja (53) and Washington Sundar (53).

    – Ends

    Published By:

    Rishabh Beniwal

    Published On:

    Aug 3, 2025

    Tune In

    Continue Reading

  • Hamas refuses to disarm until Palestinian state established

    Hamas refuses to disarm until Palestinian state established

    Thomas Mackintosh

    BBC News

    EPA-EFE/REX/Shutterstock Armed fighters from Hamas' Izz ad-Din al-Qassam Brigades stand guard during the handover of three Israeli hostages to Red Cross representatives in Al Nuseirat refugee camp, central Gaza Strip,EPA-EFE/REX/Shutterstock

    A file picture from February shows a group of armed Hamas fighters during the handover of Israeli hostages

    Hamas has reaffirmed that it will not agree to disarm unless a sovereign Palestinian state is established, in response to one of Israel’s key demands in talks about a ceasefire in Gaza.

    The Palestinian armed group said it was responding to remarks it attributed to US President Donald Trump’s Middle East envoy Steve Witkoff that Hamas had “expressed its willingness” to lay down its weapons.

    Israel considers the disarmament of Hamas one of several key conditions for any deal to end the conflict.

    Indirect negotiations between Israel and Hamas to secure a ceasefire and the release of hostages stalled last week.

    In the past few days, Arab governments have urged Hamas to disarm and surrender control of Gaza, after a number of Western countries – including France and Canada – announced plans to recognise a state of Palestine. The UK said it would if Israel did not meet certain conditions by September.

    But in its statement, Hamas said it could not yield its right to “resistance and its weapons” unless an “independent, fully sovereign Palestinian state with Jerusalem as its capital” was established.

    Israel Defense Forces (IDF)’s Lt Gen Eyal Zamir warned on Friday that there would be no respite in fighting in Gaza if negotiations failed to quickly secure the release of hostages being held by Hamas.

    And on Saturday, the family of hostage Evyatar David issued a statement after Hamas released a video showing him shirtless and emaciated in a dimly-lit tunnel.

    They accused Hamas of starving him as part of a propaganda campaign and appealed to the Israeli government and the United States to do everything possible to save him.

    Reuters Lishay Lavi, the wife of hostage Omri Miran who was kidnapped in the deadly October 7, 2023 attack on Israel by Hamas, sits amid security wire during a protest to demand the release of hostages held in GazaReuters

    Lishay Lavi, the wife of hostage Omri Miran who was kidnapped in the deadly October 7, 2023 attack on Israel by Hamas, sits amid security wire during a protest in Tel Aviv

    Witkoff has been visiting Israel as Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu’s government faces mounting pressure over the deteriorating humanitarian conditions in Gaza.

    UN agencies have warned there is man-made, mass starvation in Gaza, and have blamed Israel, which controls the entry of all supplies to the territory. Israel has insisted there are no restrictions on aid deliveries and that there is “no starvation”.

    Earlier on Saturday, Witkoff met in Tel Aviv with families of Israeli hostages who are still in Gaza.

    Footage posted online showed the Washington negotiator being greeted with applause and pleas for help by supporters of the hostages’ families as he arrived in a square that has become known for protests.

    Witkoff said peace efforts should focus on ending the conflict and bringing home all the hostages, instead of what he called a partial deal.

    As part of Witkoff’s trip, he met Netanyahu on Thursday and on Friday he inspected a widely-criticised aid site in southern Gaza.

    Latest figures from the United Nations say at least 1,373 Palestinians have been killed seeking food since late May.

    The majority have been killed by the Israeli military near Israeli and US-backed Gaza Humanitarian Foundation (GHF) distribution sites, the UN says.

    Israel has accused Hamas of instigating chaos near the sites and says its troops do not intentionally open fire on civilians.

    Office of United States Special Envoy to the Middle East Steve Witkoff shakes hands with a woman wearing a headscarfOffice of United States Special Envoy to the Middle East

    Steve Witkoff went to the Gaza Strip on Friday to see the humanitarian situation

    The Israeli military launched a campaign in Gaza in response to the Hamas-led attack on southern Israel on 7 October 2023, in which about 1,200 people were killed and 251 others were taken hostage.

    More than 60,000 people have since been killed in Gaza, and 169 people, including 93 children, have died from malnutrition, according to the territory’s Hamas-run health ministry.

    Continue Reading

  • England suffer late Zak Crawley blow in chase of 374 to win fifth Test and India series | England v India 2025

    England suffer late Zak Crawley blow in chase of 374 to win fifth Test and India series | England v India 2025

    At the end of a punishing third day for England came one last gut punch from the only fast bowler to stay the course in this series. Mohammed Siraj, scourge of the hosts 24 hours earlier, sent a searing yorker into Zak Crawley’s stumps to bring about the close and set India on course for a 2-2 draw.

    All that stands between Shubman Gill’s hardy tourists and this outcome are nine English wickets. And with Chris Woakes unlikely to bat with a dislocated shoulder, it may only take eight. After losing Crawley to the penultimate ball, England will resume in the morning on 50 for one but still with 324 more runs needed to win.

    The hosts certainly felt like the outside bet when Siraj hit the bullseye and the Indian supporters in the stands erupted. England’s target of 374 may just be three more than they cruised to in the first Test at Headingley but this is a far more capricious surface and the balance of power has long since shifted.

    Not only that, the highest successful run chase at the Oval is the 263 that England chased down against Australia, nine wickets down, in 1902. A certain Gilbert Jessop struck the record 76-ball century that day – the record that England’s aggressive current generation keep unsuccessfully flirting with.

    And there is also another injury concern in the ranks. Ben Duckett survived what was a hostile late 14-over burst from India’s quicks but as he walked off on 34 not out, his hand was throbbing following a brutish blow from Prasidh Krishna. If England are to stand any chance of securing a 3-1 series scoreline, they will likely need their incendiary opener fit and firing.

    If there was confidence to be found for England – and there was little to speak of as Siraj wheeled away in celebration – it came from the 396 all out that India stuck on the board in 88 overs. This was driven by Yashasvi Jaiswal’s 118 from 164 balls, a remarkable 66 from nightwatchman Akash Deep, and some late fireworks off the glowing bat of Washington Sundar.

    The Oval is usually Ollie Pope’s happy place but England’s stand-in captain endured a pretty torturous day. He was hampered by the absence of Woakes, his attack was strung out by just 51 overs of respite between innings, and further damaged by six catches going to ground across the innings.

    Jaiswal was afforded two of those lives on the second evening but, after resuming on 51, the left-hander did not offer another until, with the lead already sitting at 250 runs, he slashed Josh Tongue to deep backward point.

    Even this dismissal was a case of umpteenth time’s a charm, with Jaiswal previously murderous to anything short outside off stump. Mike Selvey once wrote that “were I ever to be condemned to beheading, I would like Robin Smith to be the swordsman” – a line that came to mind every time Jaiswal rocked back and powerfully cut the ball to the rope with precision.

    Yashasvi Jaiswal of India acknowledges the applause of the Oval after his 118 anchored their second innings. Photograph: Javier García/Shutterstock

    England knew all about the 23-year-old’s proficiency here, having witnessed the Jude Bellingham-style century celebration three times previously. More surprising was the identity of his partner during an initial third-wicket stand that, worth 107 runs, represented the highest of this fast forward match.

    Deep had previously made one half-century in senior cricket but over the course of the first 90 minutes he switched from nightwatchman to fully-fledged No 4. OK, not quite. But until Jamie Overton finally knocked him over, his 12 carved fours and assiduous defensive work demoralised a side that, in theory, should have started out with some optimism.

    One factor here was India correcting their day two mistake and requesting the heavy roller first thing, temporarily anesthetising a surface that had previously thrown up 21 wickets inside two days. Another was Crawley shelling Deep at slip on 21, setting the tone for an innings that eventually climaxed after tea with Sundar hammering 53 off 46 balls.

    England’s attack was running on fumes by the end, tenderised by Jaiswal class and, continuing a theme of the series, a 77-ball 53 from Ravindra Jadeja. Sundar ruthlessly applied the finishing touches, firing up the dhol drums among the Indian supporters with four fours and four heaved sixes. And no, none were struck off Harry Brook’s liquorice all sorts.

    skip past newsletter promotion

    Without a frontline spinner to offer both threat and relief, England’s three fit seamers deserve credit for their efforts. Tongue had a second Test five-wicket haul to show for it – five for 125, admittedly – while Gus Atkinson, the most consistent, took his match tally to eight. Among these was Gill lbw for 11 with the first ball after lunch, ending the Indian captain’s mighty series with 754 runs but, curiously, an average of just 13.5 inside the M25.

    This match has been a struggle for Overton, however, with his right-arm heft less suited to the pitch – his home pitch, no less – and his radar not helped by a lack of form in the lead-up: Deep’s removal ended a run of 63 overs in first-class cricket without a wicket, while Dhruv Jurel, lbw for 34 with a nice outswinger, was just his fourth of the season.

    While England largely eschewed rotation in the hope of winning this series early – ending up with Ben Stokes injured and both Brydon Carse and Jofra Archer needing a breather – Overton’s selection still felt like one that was made with an eye on the Ashes. With impressive resilience summed up by the indefatigable Siraj, India have simply kept coming.

    Continue Reading

  • Karachi Police book 8 suspects under terror, murder charges for gunning down senior lawyer – Pakistan

    Karachi Police book 8 suspects under terror, murder charges for gunning down senior lawyer – Pakistan

    The Darakshan Police on Saturday registered a case against eight nominated suspects under terrorism and murder charges for killing senior lawyer Khawaja Shamsul Islam and critically injuring his young son inside a mosque in Karachi’s Defence Housing Authority a day prior.

    South Deputy Inspector General (DIG) Syed Asad Raza had told Dawn.com on Friday that the firing took place after prayers at a mosque in DHA Phase 6. “As advocate Khawaja Shamsul Islam and his son [Khawaja Daniyal, 25] were about to leave the mosque, a lone gunman apparently resorted to firing on them and fled,” the DIG had said.

    The Darakshan Police registered a first information report (FIR) today upon the complaint of the victim’s brother and under Section 34 (acts done by several persons in furtherance of common intention), 109 (punishment of abetment if the act abetted committed in consequence and where no express provision is made for its punishment), 302 (premeditated murder) and 324 (attempted murder) of the Pakistan Penal Code and Section 7 (punishment for acts of terrorism) of the Anti-Terrorism Act.

    “My brother Khawaja Shamsul Islam, along with his two young sons and two guards had gone to offer Friday prayers and attend funeral prayers at the Quran Academy mosque located on Khayaban-i-Rahat, Phase 6,” the FIR read.

    “He was picking up his slippers at the staircase of the mosque when [the suspect] fired two shots at around 2:30pm. As a result, one bullet hit my brother and another hit his son. The suspect managed to escape while taking advantage of the rush.”

    The complainant added that the victim’s younger son was unharmed in the incident and took his injured father to a private hospital in Clifton, while unidentified persons took the injured son to another private hospital in the same locale.

    “Khawaja Shamsul Islam expired during treatment while his son was admitted with critical injuries,” the FIR added.

    The complainant alleged that the primary suspect, along with 15-20 accomplices, attacked the lawyer last November, in which he was shot twice and tortured. The case was registered with Clifton police under terror and other charges.

    “Now, the suspect, his two brothers and five other suspects attacked together … resulting in the death of the lawyer and serious injuries to his son,” the complainant stated, adding that the incident also triggered fear and chaos among the general public.

    The complainant said he wanted legal proceedings against the nominated suspects over terrorism, murder charges and criminal conspiracy.

    DIG Raza also told Dawn.com, “The prime suspect has confessed to the crime in a recorded video message.”

    On Friday, the DIG constituted a special team under the supervision of the South senior superintendent of police to arrest the suspects who murdered the advocate and injured his son.

    He had added that the prime suspect was the son of a police constable deployed for Islam’s security in the past, as witnesses heard him saying that he had taken “revenge” for the murder of his father.

    In a statement issued yesterday, the Karachi Bar Association condemned the murder of Islam and announced that its members would not appear before any court today to express solidarity with the slain senior lawyer.

    Continue Reading

  • Sofia Carson Interview on My Oxford Year, the New Netflix Movie

    Sofia Carson Interview on My Oxford Year, the New Netflix Movie

    [This story contains spoilers for Netflix’s My Oxford Year.]

    Audiences may have seen Sofia Carson fall in love onscreen in roles such as Netflix’s Purple Hearts and the Life List, but her new film is offering a revival of the traditional classic love story.

    “There’s a certain level of escapism that comes with falling in love with a love story that is so beautiful to be able to offer that, and this one in particular just felt timeless,” Carson tells The Hollywood Reporter. “It felt like it had been a while since I had seen a classic and timeless love story brought to life for this generation.”

    That love story is My Oxford Year, directed by Iain Morris and starring Carson (who also exec produce) and Queen Charlotte star Corey Mylchreest. The film, based on the 2018 book by Julia Wheelan, centers on Carson’s Anna, an ambitious young American woman who sets out for Oxford University to fulfill a lifelong dream. Though she has her life planned, things take an unexpected turn when she meets local and her professor Jamie (played by Mylchreest). They may find a connection through literature and poetry but soon their unforseen bond alters both of their lives.

    “It’s like these two people see each other for who they are for the very first time,” Carson says. “I think that’s one of the most beautiful parts of this film is that they fall in love through poetry. They fall in love through literature.”

    Amid the film’s release, Carson spoke with THR about bringing a new love story onscreen, the film’s emotional turn and hopes her character lets young women “feel represented.”

    What was it about this story that interested you and made you want to be a part of bringing it to life?

    So shortly after Purple Hearts came out, I met with Marty Bowen and Laura Quicksilver at Temple Hill, and I, of course, was very familiar with their work. They’ve brought to life some of the most beloved love stories of our time from Twilight to The Fault in Our Stars. And so in our meeting, Marty pitched wanting to bring this story to life with me as a producer and to star as Anna. I was so moved by that of course. By the moment I read the script, it was just the easiest yes. I fell so instantly in love with Anna and Jamie’s love story and with their world of poetry and literature, and it was just a beautiful love story, the kind of love that changes you. I felt so sure that Marty and Temple Hill were the partners to bring this to life, and it’s been a beautiful journey ever since.

    You’ve become quite the presence on Netflix having starred in multiple films, in particular romance stories. What is it about the romance genre that appeals to you and attracted you to want to tell these stories?

    I was always writing love songs years before I had ever even been close to being in love. I always gravitated towards love and romance. I think also as a consumer, there’s a certain level of escapism that comes with falling in love, with a love story that is so beautiful to be able to offer that, and this one in particular just felt timeless. It felt like a classic, and it felt like it had been a while since I had seen a classic and timeless love story brought to life for this generation. And that really excited me!

    What do you think are the necessities to make a romance film stand out and be a timeless story especially when we’ve had so many great romance stories told onscreen?

    Love is such an innate part of the human experience. It’s bound to be a part of most films that we bring to life as artists. This one is probably the closest to a straight romance story that I’ve ever had the privilege of telling. I’ve always been drawn towards really timeless classics from Audrey Hepburn’s films to Barbra Streisand’s The Way We Were and this film felt very reminiscent of that. I also tend to enjoy in my films, the enemies to lovers trope, which happened in Purple Hearts and also takes place in My Oxford Year. I think there’s always something really exciting about that dynamic. The cinematography of this film taking place in Oxford is just so sweeping and romantic and magical. It’s like every inch of Oxford is brimming with poetry and history, and it frames the story just so beautifully.

    For this film, Oxford felt like its own character and it was an immersive experience for the audience. But I read that you didn’t want to see Oxford before filming but rather save your immediate reaction to seeing it for the first time for the film. Why did you make that decision and what was your reaction when seeing it for the first time?

    I really wanted my first time witnessing and experiencing Oxford to take place on camera, so it was real and genuine and true to Anna’s honest reaction. It’s just as magical as it feels on film. It doesn’t feel real. It is so beautiful, every inch of it. It was such a privilege to be able to film this movie and bring this love story to life in one of the most historic institutions in the world.

    Anna may be new and not from London but she never appears to be a fish out of water. She goes in very confident and really seems to adapt easily to it. Was that intentional to not really portray this naïve person?

    Yeah, Anna walks into a room and makes her presence known. She’s beaming with confidence, and she knows that she’s earned it. She’s deserved it. I kind of walked with that as I walked in the room as Anna, and she’s the kind of person who also knows exactly who she is and what she wants out of life, and she takes the rose living deliberately, quite literally, and has planned every single moment of her life to live it deliberately. So when she’s in Oxford, she’s there to live every moment with confidence. And I’m glad that you felt that in meeting Anna.

    Sofia Carson as Anna in My Oxford Year.

    Chris Baker/Netflix

    There’s a notable scene in which Anna confronts someone in a pub who refers to her as “Miss Mexico” and “Miss Diversity Quota.” Can you talk about that moment and highlighting Anna’s background and how that also served as a foundation for understanding who she is? 

    It was so important to my mom and I — my mom and I both produced the film together — in creating Anna’s world was her background, who her mother is, who her father is and representing a woman of color (a Hispanic, Latin woman) in a way that I would feel so proud to be represented on screen. I myself am a Hispanic woman. I am an American with Hispanic parents who immigrated into this country as is Anna. And so to see a girl who looks like me in Oxford, in that institution, who has planned and worked her whole life to earn that moment, and then to be faced with the racism that we are still, unfortunately plagued with in this world, was so crucial to us. And to see how she handled it and how she stood up for herself, and how she always makes room for herself in every room that she walks into, even as the world is trying to take it away, was really important.

    There’s even a conversation between Anna and Jamie’s father during the ball where Jamie’s father talking about her background, and she says, “Yeah, my mom was a doctor in Argentina, studied medicine and now is a nurse, because her degree doesn’t transfer.” That was so important to me as well, because so often Hispanics are painted in only one very narrow stereotypical picture. I was really proud that we were able to bring Anna’s story to life in a really beautiful way that I hope a lot of young women will feel represented.

    “Anna walks into a room and makes her presence known.”

    Chris Baker/Netflix

    Anna and Jamie form a connection through their love of literature and poetry and it seems like they can communicate through the written word things they can’t articulate or are still trying to understand. Can you talk about poetry and literature being this foundation for them and how it helped them see each other in a way that others wouldn’t?

    That’s such a that’s such a beautiful question, and you’re right, that’s when they first truly connect. When they’re sitting in his office and she starts reading the poem that she picked, and he starts finishing her sentences, it’s like these two people see each other for who they are for the very first time. And I think that’s one of the most beautiful parts of this film is that they fall in love through poetry. They fall in love through literature. And we kind of discover these great poets like Alfred Tennyson or Elizabeth Barrett Browning and even some quotes from Emily Dickinson that I wasn’t familiar with that are such a tenant of their relationship. I think the one that encompasses Jamie’s love was written by Alfred Tennyson, maybe 100 years ago, and he said the words, “It is better to have loved and lost than never to have loved at all,” which I think are some of the most beautiful words ever written in the English language, and really encompass their love story. Life is too short to not live it in love and to not live it in joy, and to not live it in fulfillment, and that is what Anna learns through falling in love with Jamie.

    This story is emotional, but it’s rooted in laughter. One notable fun scene was the karaoke scene. Now when I spoke to Corey, he explained that it was rather traumatizing for him to watch himself. So I have to ask what was it like filming that and your thoughts on his performance especially given you’re a professional singer?

    (Laughs.) I’m so glad the comedy resonated with you. It was so crucial to us and and in bringing Iain Morris, our director — he created one of the most iconic comedy shows in British television The In Betweeners — it was so important that our film be grounded in laughter, because so often when life gets dark and hard, laughter is how we shed light. I love that moment and being in the audience! I thought it was so endearing, and I just felt the rest of the world was just going to fall in love with him even more for being so brave, free and so tender and honest in that moment. [He was] so visibly uncomfortable, but so game at the same time. It’s such a beautiful moment in the film. And also it ties together. He sings the song “Yellow” and then you see Anna in her yellow dress, and yellow becomes a really important theme for us in the film; What the color yellow means is hope and light. Marty literally cries watching that scene, because he thinks it’s really emotional, but it’s really endearing!

    With Jamie and Anna’s dynamic, Jamie wants things between them to be kept fun given the secret he’s keeping but it seems like it took somebody like Anna to challenge Jamie into thinking that maybe there is a person who could understand who he really is and the challenges he’s living through. And also maybe vice versa with how Jamie helps Anna. They seem to subvert each other’s expectations. Can you talk about the progression of their relationship?

    From Anna’s perspective, Anna walks into Oxford, and she’s not looking for any serious distractions. She’s a tremendously goal oriented young woman. She’s there to make the most out of her year, study as much, read as much, learn as much, absorb as much. So if she does have something with a boy, she doesn’t want it to be serious. And then Jamie, of course, we don’t know his secret, but he obviously has a profound reason for wanting to keep things fun and light. And so in the beginning, it works for both of them. But then, as we all know very well, love changes us, and falling in love changes you and it changed these two individuals in really powerful ways. It changed Anna [who went] into living the life that everything was just so perfectly planned and so deliberately thought through, into understanding that the beauty of life, no matter how painful it can be, exists in the messiness, in the freedom, the joy, in the love and the unexpected. And then for Jamie, I think she cracked something inside of him where he was so terrified of hurting and of pain. But I think her love transformed him in that way, and he wanted her there. He wanted to be loved by her, and he wanted that companionship more than ever, rather than pushing it away. It’s this beautiful, impossible, heartbreaking love, but it’s the kind of love that changes you forever.

    “She never asks him to be anything else and exactly who he is,” Carson says.

    Chris Baker/Netflix

    When we learn of Jamie’s illness and his decision to not continue treatment, Anna never seems to ever try to convince him to change his mind but rather instead convince him to not push her away and let her stand by his side through this journey regardless of how long he has left. Can you talk about her decision to remain by his side and respecting his choice?

    It was really admirable. I often didn’t understand it, but I think it was such proof of how much she knew him and understood him and loved him for exactly who he was, and stood by that decision regardless of how absolutely heart wrenchingly painful it would be. I mean, she even stands beside him when she’s speaking to his father, and she has to have a really difficult confrontation there, but she has such respect and I think an understanding of Jamie that she never asks him to be anything else and exactly who he is.

    At the end of the film, we don’t necessarily see Jamie pass away but rather get a snapshot of what could’ve been with him and Anna traveling and completing that bucket list that Jamie mentions. What did you make of the ending? Had Jamie not been sick, what did you envision for what could’ve been for him and for him and Anna?

    Wow, that’s a fantastic question that I have not thought of. But to touch on the first part of your question, I appreciate you enjoying how we decided to finish the movie, because it was definitely a big conversation for all of us. It was really important for Marty that we never know for sure if we never see Jamie leaving us. And it was also so important for us that this movie ended with hope, with life after love and seeing that snapshot of Anna and doing the things she always wanted to do. That sequence of them, traveling in Europe, we shot every scene in Amsterdam and Paris and Venice and Greece, both with myself and Corey and then me alone. And even while we were shooting, we weren’t exactly sure how it would cut together. There was thoughts of it cutting together with just Anna alone, of it only being the two of them and then we decided on the compilation of both where you kind of see them doing this trip together. Then that moment, which was so beautifully shot in Greece, where the camera kind of does the 360 around them, and then we see him disappear and it’s the implication that he’s gone and that she did this without him, was felt really impactful for us. For me, it was really important that it was clear that Anna was not stepping into Jamie’s shoes. Anna was stepping into her own. Her dream was always to do this, and in this love she I guess she gained the confidence or the realization that life is too short to not do and be the thing you’ve always wanted to do and be.

    “I do think they were each other’s great loves.”

    Courtesy of Netflix

    And then in terms of what they would’ve been, fantastic question because it changes so much of the relationship, doesn’t it? Even if he wasn’t sick, it changes so much of that dynamic. But I do think they were each other’s great loves, and I wonder if perhaps Anna would have gone back and worked a year in New York, and then she probably would have come to the realization on her own, but that’s not who she is, nor what she wants, and perhaps would have still ended up at Oxford teaching. I don’t know for certain, but I know without a doubt in my mind that they were each other’s love of their lives.

    What do you ultimately hope that people take away from this film and what did you take away from it and this character?

    I learned so much from Anna, and I related so much to her, because similarly to her, I’m a planner. I live deliberately by planning every single moment. And I learned through becoming her, I was reminded that the messiness of life is often the most beautiful and unexpected parts of life. I also think, like so many of us, we also fear heartbreak, but this movie is the reminder that it’s just so much better to have loved than never to have loved at all. I think what I hope people take away more than anything is what I mentioned earlier, is that life is too short to not live it in love and to not live it in joy and to not live it in complete and utter fulfillment, whatever that means to you.

    Now with My Oxford Year being the new addition to your growing list of stories we’ve seen onscreen, what’s next? A Purple Hearts sequel perhaps? What other stories are you looking forward to telling?

    (Laughs.) That is the question! You know, it’s been a really exciting and thrilling journey, especially this last year. Purple Hearts made history, and it did what it did, and I don’t think any of us expected that to happen a second time if it happened again. Carry-On went on to make history as the second most streamed movie in the history of Netflix, and then Life List did it again. So I think there’s a certain level of pressure that is weighing on my shoulders. A lot of it is self induced when it comes to now making these next decisions. But I think what I keep reminding myself of, with artists the most important thing that we can do is any story that you tell, whether it’s film or movie, it just has to be something that you love, that you believe in, that is honest and true to who you are, and is an important story to tell. And that’s kind of my compass in these next decisions. But we are in the middle of developing a few things that I’m really excited about. I’m excited to continue elevating the caliber of artists that I surround myself with —directors, actors, writers — and challenging myself as an actor and the stories that I tell. I have loved being able to bring stories that give light to people when it feels like the world is a bit of a dark place right now, and I don’t take that privilege lightly. I think it’s a beautiful thing to be able to do that.

    ***

    My Oxford Year is streaming now on Netflix.

    Continue Reading

  • Josh Hutcherson On Potential ‘Sunrise on the Reaping’ Return

    Josh Hutcherson On Potential ‘Sunrise on the Reaping’ Return

    With the next prequel in The Hunger Games hitting theaters on Nov. 20, 2026, at least one familiar face is open to returning.

    Josh Hutcherson, who originated the role of Peeta Mellark in the 2012 adaptation of Suzanne Collins‘ first novel in the YA series, recently addressed the possibility of reprising the role in Sunrise on the Reaping, which has been rounding out its cast in recent months.

    “That’d be cool. No, I know nothing in that world right now,” Hutcherson clarified to Brit + Co. “Hunger Games is amazing, and I’ve loved it for many years and I will love it forever.”

    Although the events of Sunrise on the Reaping are set 24 years before the events of The Hunger Games, the book briefly features a grown Peeta and Katniss Everdeen (originated by Jennifer Lawrence) as Haymitch Abernathy (which Joseph Zada is set to take over from Woody Harrelson) recounts the events of his Hunger Game to them.

    In March, Collins released the fifth book in the franchise, Sunrise on the Reaping, which marks the second prequel after 2020’s The Ballad of Songbirds and Snakes. A feature adaptation is set for a fall 2026 release.

    Josh Hutcherson in ‘The Hunger Games’ (2012)

    Murray Close/Lionsgate/Courtesy Everett Collection

    The cast also includes Whitney Peak as Haymitch’s love interest Lenore Dove Baird, Elle Fanning as Effie Trinket, Glenn Close as Drusilla Sickle, Jesse Plemons as Plutarch Heavensbee, McKenna Grace as Maysilee Donner, Billy Porter as Magno Stift, Kieran Culkin as Caesar Flickerman, Maya Hawke as Wiress, Lili Taylor as Mags and Ralph Fiennes as President Snow, among others.

    Hutcherson previously portrayed Peeta in The Hunger Games (2012), The Hunger Games: Catching Fire (2013), The Hunger Games: Mockingjay — Part 1 (2014) and Part 2 (2015), alongside Lawrence, Harrison and Liam Hemsworth as Gale Hawthorne.

    The actor has previously said he “would happily play Peeta again,” adding: “I think Peeta’s an incredible person to get to bring to life. I’m curious to know what happens between when they have their family and when the story ends, just to understand what happened in the world, how they got to that place. But I’m down. If you can talk to Suzanne Collins and tell her to write a book, I’m in. Sign me up.”

    Continue Reading

  • WhatsApp to roll out real-time voice chats with Meta AI

    WhatsApp to roll out real-time voice chats with Meta AI



    This representational image shows an illustration of the WhatsApp logo. — Unsplash

    WhatsApp is set to launch a feature enabling real-time voice chats with Meta AI, making interactions with the chatbot more dynamic and accessible.

    According to WABetaInfo, the new feature, available to some beta testers in the latest WhatsApp beta for iOS 25.21.10.76 update, which can be accessed via the TestFlight app for iOS, is set to be rolled out to more people over the coming weeks.

    With the new feature, users can initiate a voice session by tapping the waveform icon in the Chats tab. 

    There is also an option in voice preferences to automatically start voice chats when opening Meta AI from this tab, although this feature is disabled by default, allowing users to maintain control over their interactions.

    Additionally, some users can instantly start a voice conversation with Meta AI directly from the Calls tab, eliminating the need for additional steps.

    The updated interface includes a range of pre-made prompt suggestions to assist users in initiating conversations, addressing those unsure of what to ask or say.

    This screenshot shows the upcoming WhatsApp feature. — WABetaInfo
    This screenshot shows the upcoming WhatsApp feature. — WABetaInfo

    The interface also allows users to quickly attach and share photos directly from their gallery or camera right within the text input area to support their queries or messages visually.

    Voice chats with Meta AI can continue running when users switch to other apps by tapping the “collapse” icon. This allows Meta AI to listen and provide feedback as users, for example, read notes aloud or browse websites, creating an experience similar to a natural phone call with uninterrupted assistance.

    It’s important to note that privacy is emphasised throughout: users can mute the microphone or end the voice session manually by tapping the close button or switching back to text chat.

    On iOS devices, an orange dot appears in the top-right corner of the screen, near the signal and battery icons, whenever an app is actively using the microphone.

    This is part of Apple’s built-in privacy protections designed to keep users fully informed about when their microphone is in use. This indicator is managed at the system level by iOS and cannot be controlled, hidden, or modified by any app, including WhatsApp.

    This new voice chat feature eliminates the need to type, especially useful for those who may be multitasking, driving, or have mobility challenges. 

    Continue Reading