Author: admin

  • Nogizaka46’s ‘Same numbers’ Hits No. 1 on Japan Hot 100

    Nogizaka46’s ‘Same numbers’ Hits No. 1 on Japan Hot 100

    Nogizaka46’s “Same numbers” soars to No. 1 on the Billboard Japan Hot 100, on the chart released Aug. 6.

    The J-pop girl group’s 39th single dropped on July 30 and sold 775,982 copies in its first week (No. 1 for the metric), powering the track to the top spot from No. 41. This is the second-biggest first-week sales for any act this year, and is also significantly more than the group’s previous single, “Navel Orange,” which launched with 611,511 copies.

    The top 3 songs with highest first-week sales this year so far are:

    Explore

    See latest videos, charts and news

    1. Snow Man “SERIOUS” (909,496 copies)
    2. Nogizaka46 “Same numbers” (775,982 copies)
    3. &TEAM “Go in Blind” (620,541 copies)

    “Same numbers” also comes in at No. 10 for downloads, No. 27 for streaming, and No. 6 for radio airplay. It’s the popular group’s 29th No. 1 hit on the Japan Hot 100.

    ENHYPEN follows at No. 2 with “Shine On Me.” The track is off the group’s fourth Japan single called “YOI” and is being featured as the ending theme song for the drama series Ebi datte Tai ga tsuritai. The track launched with 575,330 copies to come in at No. 2 for sales, while also hitting No. 18 for downloads, topping radio. The K-pop group scores its fifth top 10 hit on the Japan Hot 100.

    HANA’s “Blue Jeans” is at No. 3. The track tops streaming for the third week in a row, while radio is at 115% compared to last week.

    LiSA’s “Shine in the Cruel Night” rises a notch to No. 4. The theme song for the latest Demon Slayer: Kimetsu no Yaiba blockbuster movie is up to 114% for streaming and 109% for video views.

    Mrs. GREEN APPLE’s “KUSUSHIKI” rises 10-5 this week, coming in at No. 2 for streaming, No. 6 for video, No. 29 for downloads, and No. 21 for karaoke.

    Other notable chart moves include 7m!n (Seven Minute) debuting at No. 8 with “JOY!,” veteran trio THE ALFEE’s “HEART OF RAINBOW” at No. 17, and King & Prince’s “I Know” at No. 31. Also, ORANGE RANGE’s “Hana” from 2004 makes its first-ever appearance on the Japan Hot 100 at No. 47.

    The Billboard Japan Hot 100 combines physical and digital sales, audio streams, radio airplay, video views and karaoke data.

    See the full Billboard Japan Hot 100 chart, tallying the week from July 28 to Aug. 3, here. For more on Japanese music and charts, visit Billboard Japan’s English X account.

    Continue Reading

  • Why Nvidia and other chip stocks are shrugging off Trump’s latest tariff threat

    Why Nvidia and other chip stocks are shrugging off Trump’s latest tariff threat

    By Emily Bary

    Trump vows to impose roughly 100% tariffs on semiconductors unless companies build in the U.S. Is it the latest installment of the ‘TACO’ trade?

    Earlier this year, Nvidia pledged to make AI supercomputers in the U.S.

    President Donald Trump threatened steep tariffs for the semiconductor industry if they don’t build in the U.S., but major chip stocks are largely shrugging off his latest comments.

    Trump’s Wednesday remarks were somewhat vague, with Trump saying he “will be putting a tariff of approximately 100% on chips and semiconductors” but declining to provide details on when those rules would go into effect.

    He also said there would be exceptions for companies “building” in the U.S., without going into detail about how much domestic manufacturing these companies actually have to be doing.

    “If you’re building in the United States of America, there’s no charge,” he said. “Even though you’re building and you’re not producing yet in terms of the big numbers of jobs and all of the things that you’re building, if you’re building, there will be no charge.”

    Trump made his comments alongside Apple Inc. (AAPL) Chief Executive Tim Cook, who pledged $100 billion more in U.S. investments on top of the $500 billion the company had previously committed over a multiyear span. As part of the latest round, Apple will spend $2.5 billion to manufacture cover glass for iPhones and watches at a Corning Inc. (GLW) facility in Kentucky.

    See more: Apple’s stock gains as new announcement with Trump could help its tariff problem

    While Trump got to hail the investment as a win for domestic iPhone production, analysts remain skeptical that the latest pledge will drive a dramatic change in Apple’s iPhone manufacturing process.

    “The reality continues to be that producing iPhones in the U.S. is unrealistic given the cost structure vs. Asia/India and remains a fairy tale concept in our view,” Wedbush’s Daniel Ives wrote on Wednesday.

    Meanwhile, Nvidia Corp. shares (NVDA) rose 0.6% in Wednesday’s extended session, while shares of Advanced Micro Devices Inc. (AMD) gained 1%. Marvell Technology Inc. stock (MRVL) was fractionally higher, while Broadcom Inc. (AVGO), and Qualcomm Inc. (QCOM) edged slightly lower.

    Nvidia has already made a U.S. investment pledge, saying in April that it would domestically produce up to $500 billion of artificial-intelligence infrastructure, including AI supercomputers, over four years. While the company is still producing other products overseas, the pledge could land favorably with Trump and chip-sector investors may reason that other big companies will follow suit if they haven’t already made public commitments of their own.

    Shares Texas Instruments Inc. (TXN) and GlobalFoundries Inc. (GFS), two chip companies with more established U.S. presences already, gained about 2% and 8%, respectively, while Intel Corp.’s stock (INTC) rose 0.7% in Wednesday’s after-hours action.

    Investors may also see the latest commentary factoring into another installment of the “TACO” trade – an acronym for “Trump always chickens out.” The term captures a sentiment by some on Wall Street that Trump makes draconian threats but ultimately backs off.

    -Emily Bary

    This content was created by MarketWatch, which is operated by Dow Jones & Co. MarketWatch is published independently from Dow Jones Newswires and The Wall Street Journal.

    (END) Dow Jones Newswires

    08-06-25 2025ET

    Copyright (c) 2025 Dow Jones & Company, Inc.

    Continue Reading

  • Lundin Mining Reports Second Quarter 2025 Results

    Lundin Mining Reports Second Quarter 2025 Results

    Lundin Mining Reports Second Quarter 2025 Results

    August 6, 2025

    VANCOUVER, BC, Aug. 6, 2025 /CNW/ – (TSX: LUN) (Nasdaq Stockholm: LUMI) Lundin Mining Corporation (“Lundin Mining” or the “Company”) today reported its second quarter 2025 financial results. Unless otherwise stated, results are presented in United States dollars on a 100% basis.

    Jack Lundin, President and CEO commented, “Our portfolio of high-quality assets continued to generate solid results during the quarter keeping us firmly on track to achieve the midpoint of our production guidance. This resulted in over $930 million in revenue and $211 million in free cash flow from operations1. Consolidated copper cash costs decreased to $1.92/lb, down 7% from last quarter. Importantly, our record safety performance in Q1 continued into Q2, with the Company achieving the lowest Total Recordable Injury Frequency Rate recorded in the past ten years.

    “With the successful $1.4 billion sale of our European assets, we paid down our term loan and reduced net debt excluding lease liabilities1 to $135 million as at the end of Q2. At our Capital Markets Day (“CMD”) event in June, we showcased medium-term brownfield expansion opportunities that complement the long-term growth potential of the Vicuña Project. The Vicuña Project team continues to progress with parallel studies supporting a multi-phased development plan and an integrated technical report remains on track for Q1 2026. Our five-year financial outlook provided at the CMD event demonstrates our ability to fund these transformational growth initiatives while maintaining shareholder returns in the form of share buybacks and dividends. We look forward to continuing to build off the solid first half performance for the remainder of 2025.”

    Second Quarter Operational and Financial Highlights

    Strong operational results drove earnings in the second quarter supported by continued higher gold prices. The Company’s balance sheet was also strengthened from the sale of its European assets. 2025 production guidance was reaffirmed in the quarter and cash cost guidance was improved.

    • Copper Production: Production of 80,073 tonnes of copper in the second quarter from continuing operations.
    • Other Production: During the quarter, 38,118 ounces of gold and 2,713 tonnes of nickel were produced.
    • Revenue: $937.2 million in the second quarter from continuing operations with a realized copper price1 of $4.40 /lb and a realized gold price1 of $3,478 /oz.
    • Net Earnings and Adjusted Earnings1: During the quarter, net earnings from continuing operations attributable to shareholders of the Company was $126.1 million ($0.15 per share) and adjusted earnings from continuing operations was $98.2 million ($0.11 per share).
    • Adjusted EBITDA1: $394.7 million was generated from continuing operations for the quarter.
    • Cash Generation: Cash provided by continuing operations was $314.6 million and free cash flow from operationswas $211.1 million, which was impacted by significant cash income taxes paid at Candelaria in the quarter due to timing of payments and increased taxable income.
    • Growth: During the quarter the Company outlined strategic aspirations to become a global top-ten copper producer and achieve copper production of over 500,000 tonnes per year and gold production of over 550,000 ounces per year:
      • On April 16, 2025 Lundin Mining completed the sale of Neves-Corvo and Zinkgruvan to Boliden AB (“Boliden”) for cash proceeds of $1,314.6 million, net of cash disposed and transaction costs, and subsequently repaid in full its term loan of $1,150 million and repaid $170.0 million of amounts drawn on its revolving credit facility.
      • During the quarter the Company announced a Mineral Resource estimate (the “Vicuña Mineral Resource”) for the Vicuña Project which highlighted one of the world’s largest copper, gold and silver Mineral Resources, with the potential to support a globally ranked mining complex. The Company continues to advance the integrated study of the Filo del Sol and Josemaria deposits, which is expected to be completed in Q1 2026. The resource contains:
        • Contained copper of 13 million tonnes (“Mt”) Measured and Indicated at 0.35% copper (“M&I”) and 25 Mt Inferred at 0.32% copper.
        • Contained gold of 32 million ounces (“Moz”) M&I at 0.27 g/t gold and 49 Moz Inferred at 0.19 g/t gold.
        • Contained silver of 659 Moz M&I at 5.6 g/t silver and 808 Moz Inferred at 3.2 g/t silver.
      • On June 18, 2025, the Company hosted a Capital Markets Day, which outlined medium-term, low-cost brownfield expansion opportunities alongside the Vicuña Project which offers transformational long-term growth potential. The Company also provided guidance on financial performance for the next five years that outlined its ability to fund future growth plans.
    • 2024 Sustainability Report Published: The Company continues to demonstrate its commitment to sustainability as an integral part of the Company’s overall strategy for disciplined growth and released its annual 2024 Sustainability report on May 26, 2025.
    • Shareholder Returns: A quarterly dividend of $0.0275 per share has been declared. In addition, the Company purchased 4,629,000 common shares during the quarter at an average share price of C$10.91 for total consideration of $36.2 million under its normal course issuer bid. So far during 2025, Lundin Mining has cancelled 13,058,800 common shares at a cost of approximately $104.0 million.
    • Outlook: The Company reaffirms it is tracking to full year guidance for production of all metals, including 303,000 – 330,000 tonnes of copper. The Company has further revised cash cost guidance at Chapada which supports its previously lowered overall consolidated cash cost guidance for the Company to $1.95 to $2.15 per pound cash cost. Annual sustaining capital expenditure guidance has remained unchanged with reductions at Caserones being offset by higher capital expenditure at Chapada. Expansionary capital guidance has increased, driven by an increase in the Vicuña Project budget.
    • Discontinued Operations: On April 16, 2025, the Company completed the sale of its European assets, Neves-Corvo and Zinkgruvan, to Boliden. The operating results of the Neves-Corvo and Zinkgruvan reporting segments have been classified as net earnings from discontinued operations. Net earnings from discontinued operations for the quarter of $102.4 million includes a gain on disposal of $106.4 million, net of income tax.

    _________

    These are non-GAAP measures. Free cash flow from operations of $211 million is from continuing operations. Please refer to the Company’s discussion of non-GAAP and other performance measures in its Management’s Discussion and Analysis (“MD&A”) for the three and six months ended June 30, 2025 and the Reconciliation of Non-GAAP Measures section at the end of this news release.

    Summary Financial Results 

    Three months ended

    June 30,

    Six months ended

    June 30,

    (US$ millions continuing operations except where noted, except per share amounts)

    2025

    2024

    2025

    2024

    Revenue

    937.2

    878.3

    1,901.1

    1,690.6

    Gross profit

    271.3

    228.5

    580.2

    426.1

    Attributable net earningsa

    126.1

    84.3

    264.1

    122.7

    Net earnings

    159.6

    119.4

    340.9

    202.3

    Adjusted earningsa,b (all operations)

    99.9

    122.1

    246.1

    167.3

    Adjusted earningsa,b — continuing operations

    98.2

    83.4

    192.1

    139.7

    Adjusted earningsa,b,c — discontinued operations

    1.7

    38.7

    53.9

    27.6

    Adjusted EBITDAb (all operations)

    395.8

    460.9

    846.5

    823.7

    Adjusted EBITDAb — continuing operations

    394.7

    369.9

    782.6

    708.3

    Adjusted EBITDAb,c — discontinued operations

    1.0

    91.0

    63.9

    115.4

    Basic earnings per share (“EPS”)a (all operations)

    0.27

    0.16

    0.41

    0.18

    Diluted earnings per share (“EPS”)a (all operations)

    0.27

    0.16

    0.41

    0.17

    Basic and diluted earnings per share (“EPS”)a — continuing operations

    0.15

    0.11

    0.31

    0.16

    Basic and diluted earnings per share (“EPS”)a,c — discontinued operations

    0.12

    0.05

    0.10

    0.02

    Adjusted EPSa,b (all operations)

    0.12

    0.16

    0.29

    0.22

    Adjusted EPSa,b — continuing operations

    0.11

    0.11

    0.22

    0.18

    Adjusted EPSa,b,c — discontinued operations

    0.00

    0.05

    0.06

    0.04

    Cash provided by operating activities (all operations)

    334.6

    491.8

    511.4

    759.3

    Cash provided by operating activities – continuing operations

    314.6

    440.0

    436.9

    672.3

    Cash provided by operating activities – discontinued operationsc

    20.0

    51.8

    74.5

    87.0

    Adjusted operating cash flowb (all operations)

    279.4

    369.9

    672.0

    683.6

    Adjusted operating cash flowb — continuing operations

    277.2

    291.2

    614.2

    585.3

    Adjusted operating cash flowb,c — discontinued operations

    2.2

    78.7

    57.8

    98.3

    Adjusted operating cash flow per shareb (all operations)

    0.33

    0.48

    0.79

    0.89

    Adjusted operating cash flow per shareb — continuing operations

    0.32

    0.38

    0.72

    0.76

    Adjusted operating cash flow per shareb,c — discontinued operations

    0.00

    0.10

    0.06

    0.13

    Free cash flowb (all operations)

    175.9

    236.9

    128.2

    235.1

    Free cash flowb — continuing operations

    165.0

    226.3

    111.8

    226.1

    Free cash flowb,c — discontinued operations

    10.9

    10.6

    16.4

    9.0

    Free cash flow from operationsb (all operations)

    222.6

    337.6

    254.4

    405.2

    Free cash flow from operationsb — continuing operations

    211.1

    324.7

    232.6

    391.3

    Free cash flow from operationsb,c— discontinued operations

    11.5

    12.9

    21.8

    13.9

    Cash and cash equivalents

    279.3

    452.8

    279.3

    452.8

    Net debt excluding lease liabilitiesb

    (135.1)

    (893.8)

    (135.1)

    (893.8)

    Net debtb

    (380.2)

    (1,152.9)

    (380.2)

    (1,152.9)

    a Attributable to shareholders of Lundin Mining Corporation.

    b These are non-GAAP measures. Please refer to the Company’s discussion of non-GAAP and other performance measures in its MD&A for the three and six months ended June 30, 2025 and the Reconciliation of Non-GAAP Measures section at the end of this news release.

    c Discontinued operations are to April 16, 2025.

    • For the quarter ended June 30, 2025, the Company generated revenue from continuing operations of $937.2 million (Q2 2024 – $878.3 million).
    • Gross profit from continuing operations for the quarter of $271.3 million was $42.8 million higher than in the prior year comparable period of $228.5 million. The increase was primarily due to higher sales volume, lower treatment charges, and cost savings from operational efficiencies.
    • Net earnings from continuing operations for the quarter of $159.6 million was higher than in the prior year comparable period of $119.4 million. The increase was primarily due to an increase in gross profit combined with lower interest expense due to the repayment of debt in the quarter with cash proceeds received from the sale of the Neves-Corvo and Zinkgruvan operations.
    • Adjusted earnings2 from continuing operations for the quarter of $98.2 million, increased from $83.4 million primarily as a result of higher gross profit.
    • Cash provided by operating activities related to continuing operations for the quarter of $314.6 million represented a decrease of $125.4 million from the prior year comparable period of $440.0 million. The decrease was primarily due to significant cash income taxes paid in the quarter of $168.0 million (Q2 2024 – $47.1 million), primarily at Candelaria, and a reduction in working capital inflows of $111.4 million to $37.4 million from $148.8 million in the prior year comparable period.
    • In the quarter, sustaining capital expenditures3 from continuing operations of $115.9 million were lower than in the prior year comparable period of $126.6 million. The reduction was primarily due to lower spending at Candelaria from reduced deferred stripping.
    • Expansionary capital expendituresof $33.7 million in the quarter were lower than $87.1 million in the prior year comparable period due to the formation of Vicuña, a 50/50 joint arrangement with BHP Investments Canada Inc. (“BHP”) (the “Joint Arrangement”), on January 15, 2025. From this date, the Company’s expansionary capital expenditures include 50% of Vicuña’s capital expenditures.
    • Free cash flowfrom continuing operations for the quarter of $165.0 million was lower than in the prior year comparable period of $226.3 million primarily due to reduced cash provided by operating activities related to continuing operations, partially offset by lower sustaining and expansionary capital expenditures.
    • As at August 6, 2025, the Company had cash of approximately $276 million and net debt excluding lease liabilities2 of approximately $139 million.

    _____________

    2 These are non-GAAP measures. Please refer to the Company’s discussion of non-GAAP and other performance measures in its MD&A for the three and six months ended June 30, 2025 and the Reconciliation of Non-GAAP Measures section at the end of this news release.

    3 This is a supplementary financial measure. Please refer to the Company’s discussion of non-GAAP and other performance measures in its MD&A for the three and six months ended June 30, 2025 and the Reconciliation of Non-GAAP Measures section at the end of this news release.

    Operational Performance

    Total Production

    (Contained metal)a

    2025

    2024

    YTD

    Q2

    Q1

    Total

    Q4

    Q3

    Q2

    Q1

    Continuing Operations

    Copper (t)b

    156,847

    80,073

    76,774

    336,875

    94,094

    91,772

    71,614

    79,395

    Gold (oz)b

    69,967

    38,118

    31,849

    158,436

    46,456

    46,712

    32,439

    32,829

    Nickel (t)

    5,009

    2,713

    2,296

    7,486

    1,617

    893

    1,721

    3,255

    Molybdenum (t)b

    982

    380

    602

    3,183

    912

    693

    714

    864

    Discontinued OperationsC

    Copper (t)

    8,319

    1,225

    7,094

    32,192

    7,397

    8,083

    8,094

    8,618

    Zinc (t)

    58,233

    9,285

    48,948

    191,704

    51,946

    46,610

    47,460

    45,688

    a –  Tonnes (t) and ounces (oz).

    b – Candelaria and Caserones production are on a 100% basis.

    c – Discontinued operations results are to April 16, 2025.

    Candelaria (80% owned): Candelaria produced 36,999 tonnes of copper and 20,574 ounces of gold in concentrate on a 100% basis during the quarter. Production in the quarter and year-to-date periods were positively impacted by increased throughput as a result of softer ore feed and higher ball mill runtime due to rescheduled maintenance in the quarter. Mining and processing in the quarter was focused on Phase 11 with some contribution from higher grade areas of Phase 12. Cash cost4 of $1.81/lb during the quarter was positively impacted by higher production and favourable foreign exchange.

    Caserones (70% owned): Caserones produced 29,290 tonnes of copper and 380 tonnes of molybdenum on a 100% basis during the quarter. Production in the quarter was impacted by lower grades as a result of mine sequencing with mining focused on Phases 6 and 7 as mining of Phase 5 nears completion. Throughput was impacted slightly by a temporary reduction in primary crusher availability during the quarter and copper cathode production benefitted from increased material placed on the leach pad. Cash cost of $2.45/lb in the quarter benefitted from lower mining and milling costs, as well as lower treatment and refining charges and favorable foreign exchange.

    Chapada (100% owned): Chapada produced 11,274 tonnes of copper and 17,544 ounces of gold in concentrate during the quarter. Ore from the North and South open pits was mined and processed, resulting in higher grades as compared to the prior quarter which focused on processing ore from the older low-grade stockpile. Cash cost of $0.75/lb was the lowest amount since 2021, and benefitted from higher gold by-product credits as a result of higher realized gold prices, combined with favourable foreign exchange and higher copper sales volume.

    Eagle (100% owned): Eagle produced 2,713 tonnes of nickel and 2,510 tonnes of copper in the quarter. Production was impacted by a temporary reduction in equipment availability and reduced throughput as a result of an unplanned four-day power outage. Production gradually increased to normal levels following the completion of ramp rehabilitation at Eagle East in the previous quarter. Nickel cash cost of $2.02/lb was positively impacted by higher by-product credits and higher nickel sales volumes.

    Outlook

    The Company remains on track to meet annual production guidance for all metals. In light of higher gold prices, the cash cost guidance range for Chapada is further reduced from that announced on June 17, 2025.

    At Candelaria, production in the second half of the year is expected to be in line with the first half of the year to meet the Company’s annual production guidance for 2025. Cash costs at Candelaria are tracking to the mid-point of guidance for the full year.

    At Caserones, higher copper head grades anticipated in the second half of the year, together with strong cathode production are expected to sustain the Company’s annual production guidance for 2025.

    At Chapada, production is expected to be weighted to the second half of the year as copper grades and recoveries in the second half of the year are expected to remain in line with the second quarter. Mine sequencing is expected to result in processing increased fresh ore from the North and South pits and less lower-grade stockpile material. Cash costs are expected to continue to benefit from higher gold prices, leading to a further reduction in annual guidance as compared to that previously announced by the Company (see News Release dated June 17, 2025).

    At Eagle, grades and mining rates are expected to normalize in the second half of the year, supporting annual production guidance. Mining at the Eagle deposit is expected to be completed towards the end of the year and higher grade ore from Eagle East will be sourced.

    ___________

    4 This is a non-GAAP measure. Please refer to the Company’s discussion of non-GAAP and other performance measures in its MD&A for the three and six months ended June 30, 2025 and the Reconciliation of Non-GAAP Measures section at the end of this news release.

    See below for revised 2025 Guidance:

    2025 Production and Cash Cost Guidancea

    Guidancea

    Revised Guidance

    (contained metal)

    Production

    Cash Cost ($/lb)b

    Production

    Cash Cost ($/lb)b

    Copper (t)

    Candelaria (100%)

    140,000 – 150,000

    1.60 – 1.80c

    140,000 – 150,000

    1.80 – 2.00c

    Caserones (100%)

    115,000 – 125,000

    2.40 – 2.60

    115,000 – 125,000

    2.40 – 2.60

    Chapada

    40,000 – 45,000

    1.30 – 1.50d

    40,000 – 45,000

    1.10 – 1.30d

    Eagle

    8,000 – 10,000

    8,000 – 10,000

    Total

    303,000 – 330,000

    1.95 – 2.15

    303,000 – 330,000

    1.95 – 2.15

    Gold (oz)

    Candelaria (100%)

    78,000 – 88,000

    78,000 – 88,000

    Chapada

    57,000 – 62,000

    57,000 – 62,000

    Total

    135,000 – 150,000

    135,000 – 150

    Nickel (t)

    Eagle

    8,000 – 11,000

    3.05 – 3.25

    8,000 – 11,000

    3.05 – 3.25

    a. Guidance as outlined in the news release “Lundin Mining Highlights Strategic Vision and Financial Outlook for Leading Growth and Shareholder Returns” dated June 17, 2025.

    b. 2025 cash costs are based on various assumptions and estimates, including but not limited to: production volumes,  commodity prices (Cu: $4.40/lb, Au: $3,000/oz, Mo: $20.00/lb, Ag: $30.00/oz), foreign exchange rates (USD/CLP:950, USD/BRL:5.75) and operating costs. Cash cost is a non-GAAP measure –  see the Reconciliation of Non-GAAP Measures section at the end of this news release.

    c. 68% of Candelaria’s total gold and silver production are subject to a streaming agreement. Cash costs are calculated based on receipt of approximately $433/oz gold and $4.32/oz silver.

    d. Chapada’s cash cost is calculated on a by-product basis and does not include the effects of its copper stream agreements. Effects of the copper stream agreements are reflected in copper revenue and will impact realized price per pound.

    2025 Capital Expenditure Guidancea,b,c

    ($ millions)

    Guidance

    Candelaria (100% basis)

    205

    Caserones (100% basis)

    200

    Chapada

    100

    Eagle

    25

    Other

    Total Sustaining

    530

    Expansionary – Candelaria (100% basis)

    50

    Expansionary – Vicuña Joint Arrangement (50% basis)

    215

    Total Capital Expenditures

    795

    a. Guidance as outlined in the news release “Lundin Mining Highlights Strategic Vision and Financial Outlook for Leading Growth and Shareholder Returns” dated June 17, 2025.

    b. Sustaining capital expenditure is a supplementary financial measure, and expansionary capital expenditure is a non-GAAP measure – see the Reconciliation of Non-GAAP Measures section at the end of this news release.

    c. Capital expenditures are based on various assumptions and estimates, including, but not limited to foreign currency exchange rates (USD/CLP: 950, USD/BRL: 5.50)

    2025 Exploration Investment Guidance

    Total exploration expenditure guidance for 2025 remains at $40 million, which has potential to increase subject to successful exploration results at the Boulderdash property. Drilling metres (“m”) across the Company have been re-allocated to account for the anticipated earn-in agreement with Talon Metal Corp. (“Talon”) and the Boulderdash property. 

    Exploration

    During the quarter, exploration activity focused on in-mine and near-mine targets at the Company’s operations. Exploration drilling at Candelaria was focused on Candelaria South (Mariana) and Candelaria Norte with a total of 1,533m completed during the quarter.

    At Caserones, drilling started for the year early in the quarter with one rig at the Caserones pit targeting deep high-grade copper breccias and two rigs at Angelica targeting copper sulphides beneath the Angelica oxide deposit, totaling 3,097m.

    A total of 5,077m was drilled using two rigs at Chapada. One rig was in the Saúva resource area, focusing on adding high grade resources. A second rig was testing shallow targets outside the Saúva resource area and near-mine targets.

    At Eagle, drilling commenced at the Boulderdash property with two rigs targeting potential extensions of the known nickel-copper mineralized intrusion. This drilling is part of an exclusivity agreement with Talon to negotiate an earn-in agreement for the right to acquire up to a 70% ownership interest in the Boulderdash property that is near the Company’s Eagle mine. Total drilling for the quarter was 1,874m, as part of the proposed 10,000m Phase 1 earn-in drilling program.

    Vicuña

    On January 15, 2025, the Company completed the joint acquisition of all of the issued and outstanding common shares of Filo Corp. not already owned by Lundin Mining and concurrently formed the Joint Arrangement, resulting in the Company indirectly holding a 50% interest in Vicuña Corp., an independently managed joint operation which owns the Josemaria project in Argentina and the Filo del Sol project in Argentina and Chile. BHP indirectly owns the remaining 50% interest in Vicuña.

    In 2025, work continues to focus on advancing studies related to the synergies between the Filo del Sol and Josemaria projects, continuing the drilling program, and progressing the development of the Josemaria project.

    Activities at Josemaria during the quarter focused on the completion and submission of the Environmental Impact Assessment (“EIA”), power infrastructure planning, and continued advancement of the water program. Mobilization and preparatory works for the northern access road commenced in the quarter with full construction scheduled to begin later in 2025 following the winter season. Work also continued on a multi-phased development concept pertaining to the Josemaria and Filo del Sol deposits. An integrated technical report is targeted to be complete by early 2026.

    Government relations activities continued with both the national and provincial governments. In conjunction, discussions on provincial agreements continued to be advanced. Work also progressed in the quarter on an application for the Argentinean Basis Law – Incentive Regime for Large Investments (“RIGI”).

    Community investment programs were launched in 2025 with a focus on gender, youth training, cooperative development, and rural livelihoods.

    On May 4, 2025, the Company announced an initial Mineral Resource estimate for the Filo del Sol sulphide deposit, an update to the Mineral Resource estimate for the Filo del Sol oxide deposit and an update to the Mineral Resource estimate for the Josemaria deposit, which highlighted the combined Vicuña Project as one of the largest copper, gold and silver resources in the world. Details of the Vicuña Mineral Resource are set out in the “NI 43-101 Technical Report on the Vicuña Project, Argentina and Chile” with an effective date of April 15, 2025 (the “Vicuña Technical Report”).

    The Filo del Sol and Josemaria deposits have significant high-grade mineralization that could provide the initial years of mining for the Project.

    • Filo del Sol high-grade core at cut-off of 0.75% copper equivalent (“CuEq”): 606 million Mt (M&I) at 1.14% CuEq5 (0.74% Cu) for contained metal of 4.5 Mt copper at 0.74%, 9.6 Moz gold at 0.49 g/t and 259 Moz silver at 13.3 g/t.
    • Near surface Josemaria high-grade core at cut-off of 0.60% CuEq: 196 Mt (M&I) at 0.73% CuEq6 (0.50% Cu) for contained metal of 978 kt copper at 0.50%, 2.4 Moz gold at 0.38 g/t and 11 Moz silver at 1.7 g/t.

    The Filo del Sol deposit also contains copper oxide mineralization at surface.

    • Lower capital intensity heap leach oxide cap of 434 Mt (M&I) at 0.34% copper (1.5 Mt), 0.28 g/t gold (3.9 Moz) and 2.5 g/t silver (35 Moz)
    • High-grade oxides at a cut-off of 0.60% CuEq of 181 Mt (M&I) at 1.05% CuEq7(0.50% Cu) for contained metal of 911 kt copper at 0.50%, 2.3 Moz gold at 0.39 g/t and 230 Moz silver at 39.6 g/t.

    There is clear potential for expansion. Drilling at Filo del Sol bottomed in mineralization and is open at depth, while drilling at the Flamenco zone approximately 2 kilometers to the south has intercepted mineralization beyond the limits of the current resource pit shell.

    During the quarter, the Company spent $32.2 million in capital expenditures compared to $87.1 million in the prior year comparable period. On a year-to-date basis, the Company spent $74.9 million compared to $143.1 million in the prior year comparable period. Reduced spending in both the quarter and year-to-date periods is due to the formation of Vicuña on January 15, 2025. From this date, the Company’s expansionary capital expenditures include 50% of Vicuña’s capital expenditures.

    Expansionary Projects

    The Company has a number of brownfield expansionary projects that are expected to contribute to medium-term growth in its existing operating asset portfolio. Combined, these opportunities could add 30,000 to 40,000 tonnes of copper production growth and 60,000 to 70,000 ounces of annual gold production through low capital intensity growth projects.

    Candelaria

    Projects are ongoing to support the mine life extension under the Environmental Impact Assessment (“2040 EIA”). During the quarter, $1.5 million was spent on relocation of electrical transmission lines to allow for expansion of the open pit. During the year-to-date period, $21.7 million of spending also included key equipment deliveries as well as the acquisition of mining rights.

    Additionally, the Company is working on an expansion opportunity which re-envisions the previously disclosed Candelaria Underground Expansion Project (“CUGEP”) to a lower-capital intensive option with only marginally lower production rates. The Company forecasts that this could increase underground throughput capacity by approximately 50% to 60% to ~22,000 tonnes per day from current levels of 12,000 to 14,000 tonnes per day and increase annual copper production by approximately 10% or 14,000 tonnes of copper per year. The opportunity includes insourcing of the Company’s underground mining contract, which is anticipated to provide incremental copper production gains from higher productivity rates through improved mechanical availability and higher development rates. Initial recruitment has begun as part of the internalization process, along with training and licensing of blast technicians. It is expected that by mid-2026, the initial underground mining crews will have been internalized. 

    Caserones

    While cathode production at Caserones has remained strong over recent quarters, the Company is anticipating that through continued improvements with its leaching practices and additional oxide material, incremental future production can be realized in the range of 7,000 to 10,000 tonnes of copper per year.

    Chapada

    The development of the Saúva deposit, approximately 15 kilometers from the Chapada mine, represents a near mine opportunity to add approximately 15,000 to 20,000 tonnes of copper production per year and 50,000 to 60,000 ounces of gold production per year, representing 50% and 100% production increases respectively. This is expected to be achieved through the installation of additional grinding capacity and by offsetting lower grade material with higher grade ore from Saúva. Permitting and technical work is ongoing to further define the project and the Company anticipates completing a pre-feasibility study by the end of 2025.

    __________

    5 Filo del Sol CuEq assumes average metallurgical recoveries of 78% for copper, 62% for gold and 62% for silver, and metal prices of $4.43/lb Cu, $2,185/oz Au and $28.80/oz Ag. The CuEq formula is: CuEq= Cu% + (0.59 * Au g/t) + (0.008 * Ag g/t).

    6 Josemaria high-grade core CuEq assumes metallurgical recoveries of 84% for copper, 67% for gold and 63% for silver, and metal prices of $4.43/lb Cu, $2,185/oz Au and $28.80/oz Ag. The CuEq formula is: CuEq= Cu% + (0.58 * Au g/t) + (0.007 * Ag g/t).

    7 Filo del Sol oxide CuEq assumes average metallurgical recoveries of 78% for copper, 62% for gold and 62% for silver, and metal prices of $4.43/lb Cu, $2,185/oz Au and $28.80/oz Ag. The CuEq formula is: CuEq= Cu% + (0.59 * Au g/t) + (0.008 * Ag g/t).

    Second Quarter 2025 Results Conference Call and Webcast Details 

    The Company will hold a webcast and conference call on Thursday, August 7, 2025 to present the results. Webcast and conference call details are provided below. 

    Webcast / Conference Call Details:

    Date: Thursday, August 7, 2025

    Time: 7:00 AM PT | 10:00 AM ET

    Listen Only Webcast: WEBCAST LINK

    Dial In for Investor & Analyst Q&A: DIAL IN LINK

    To participate in the call click on the dial in LINK above and complete the online registration form. Once registered you will receive the dial-in information and a unique PIN to join the call and ask questions.

    A replay of the webcast will be available by clicking on the webcast LINK above and will be archived on the Company’s website for a limited period of time.

    About Lundin Mining

    Lundin Mining is a diversified Canadian base metals mining company with projects or operations focused in Argentina, Brazil, Chile and the United States of America, and primarily producing copper, gold and nickel.

    The information in this release is subject to the disclosure requirements of Lundin Mining under the EU Market Abuse Regulation. The information was submitted for publication, through the agency of the contact persons set out below on August 6, 2025 at 17:30 Vancouver Time.

    Technical Information 

    The scientific and technical information in this document pertaining to the Vicuña Mineral Resource is based on the Vicuña Technical Report. The Vicuña Technical Report was prepared by Luke Evans, M.Sc., P.Eng. of SLR Consulting (Canada) Ltd, Paul Daigle, P.Geo. of AGP Mining Consultants Inc., Sean Horan, P.Geo. of Resource Modeling Solutions Ltd., Jeffrey Austin, P.Eng. of International Metallurgical and Environmental Inc., and Bruno Borntraeger, P.Eng. of Knight Piésold Ltd, each of whom reviewed, verified and approved the scientific and technical information pertaining to the Vicuña Mineral Resource that is related to his respective scope of responsibility. Each of the foregoing individuals is a “Qualified Person” as defined by National Instrument 43-101 – Standards of Disclosure for Mineral Projects (“NI 43-101”) and independent of the Company.

    The scientific and technical information in this document other than that pertaining to the Vicuña Mineral Resource has been reviewed and approved in accordance with NI 43-101 by Eduardo Cortés, Registered Member (Comisión Calificadora de Competencias en Recursos y Reservas Mineras (Chilean Mining Commission)), Vice President, Mining & Resources at Lundin Mining, a “Qualified Person” under NI 43-101. Mr. Cortés has verified the data disclosed in this document and no limitations were imposed on his verification process.

    The Vicuña Mineral Resource estimates are shown on a 100% basis and have an effective date of April 15, 2025. For further information related to the Vicuña Mineral Resource, including the key assumptions, parameters, and methods used to estimate the Vicuña Mineral Resource, risks and cautionary statements, see the Vicuña Technical Report and the Company’s News Release “Lundin Mining Announces Initial Mineral Resource at Filo Del Sol Demonstrating One of the World’s Largest Copper, Gold, and Silver Resources” dated May 4, 2025.

    Reconciliation of Non-GAAP Measures  

    The Company uses certain performance measures in its analysis. These performance measures have no standardized meaning within generally accepted accounting principles under International Financial Reporting Standards and, therefore, amounts presented may not be comparable to similar data presented by other mining companies. For additional details please refer to the Company’s discussion of non-GAAP and other performance measures in its Management’s Discussion and Analysis for the three and six months ended June 30, 2025 which is available on SEDAR+ at www.sedarplus.com.

    Cash Cost per Pound and All-in Sustaining Costs per pound can be reconciled to Production Costs as follows:

    Three months ended June 30, 2025

    Continuing Operations

    Candelaria

    Caserones

    Chapada

    Consolidated

    Eagle

    Total –
    continuing
    operations1

    ($ millions, unless otherwise noted)

    (Cu)

    (Cu)

    (Cu) 

    (Cu)

    (Ni)

    Sales volumes (Contained metal):

    Tonnes                    

    36,603

    30,076

    10,284

    76,963

    2,226

    Pounds (000s)

    80,696

    66,307

    22,672

    169,675

    4,907

    Production costs     

    186.1

    204.7

    75.0

    465.8

    40.4

    506.6

    Less: Royalties and other

    (3.9)

    (9.8)

    (6.3)

    (20.0)

    (4.1)

    (24.5)

    182.2

    194.9

    68.7

    445.8

    36.3

    482.1

    Deduct: By-product credits2

    (42.8)

    (31.8)

    (51.8)

    (126.3)

    (26.4)

    (152.7)

    Add: Treatment and refining

    6.6

    (0.5)

    0.2

    6.3

    6.3

    Cash cost

    146.0

    162.6

    17.1

    325.8

    9.9

    335.7

    Cash cost per pound ($/lb)

    1.81

    2.45

    0.75

    1.92

    2.02

    Add: Sustaining capital         

    50.2

    31.9

    27.4

    6.4

    Royalties

    4.0

    8.5

    3.6

    4.1

    Reclamation and other closure accretion and depreciation

    2.0

    1.3

    1.7

    1.2

    Leases & other

    1.6

    17.1

    1.0

    0.9

    All-in sustaining cost

    203.9

    221.4

    50.8

    22.5

    AISC per pound ($/lb)

    2.53

    3.34

    2.24

    4.58

    1 Includes immaterial amounts related to other segments.

    2 By-product credits are presented net of the associated treatment and refining charges.

    Three months  ended June 30, 2025

    Discontinued Operations1

    Neves-Corvo

    Zinkgruvan

    Total –
    discontinued
    operations

    ($ millions, unless otherwise noted)

    (Cu)

    (Zn)

    Sales volumes (Contained metal):

    Tonnes                    

    1,394

    1,548

    Pounds (000s)

    3,073

    3,413

    Production costs     

    14.3

    2.7

    17.0

    Less: Royalties and other

    (0.2)

    (0.2)

    14.1

    2.7

    16.8

    Deduct: By-product credits2

    (7.5)

    0.8

    (6.7)

    Add: Treatment and refining

    0.8

    0.6

    1.4

    Cash cost

    7.4

    4.0

    11.5

    Cash cost per pound ($/lb)

    2.42

    1.18

    Add: Sustaining capital         

    9.1

    Royalties

    0.2

    Reclamation and other closure accretion and depreciation

    0.1

    All-in sustaining cost

    7.7

    13.1

    AISC per pound ($/lb)

    2.51

    3.85

    1 Discontinued operations results are to April 16, 2025.

    2 By-product credits are presented net of the associated treatment and refining charges.

     

    Three months ended June 30, 2024

    Continuing Operations

    Candelaria

    Caserones

    Chapada

    Consolidated

    Eagle

    Total –
    continuing
    operations1

    ($ millions, unless otherwise noted)

    (Cu)

    (Cu)

    (Cu) 

    (Cu)

    (Ni)

    Sales volumes (Contained metal):

    Tonnes                    

    29,999

    29,862

    8,293

    68,154

    2,018

    Pounds (000s)

    66,137

    65,834

    18,283

    150,254

    4,449

    Production costs     

    175.4

    208.9

    69.2

    453.5

    37.7

    490.6

    Less: Royalties and other

    (4.6)

    (9.3)

    (3.2)

    (17.1)

    (4.0)

    (20.5)

    170.8

    199.6

    66.0

    436.4

    33.7

    470.1

    Deduct: By-product credits2

    (35.8)

    (37.3)

    (31.2)

    (104.3)

    (19.9)

    (124.2)

    Add: Treatment and refining

    8.9

    8.9

    2.8

    20.6

    0.6

    21.3

    Cash cost

    143.9

    171.3

    37.6

    352.8

    14.4

    367.2

    Cash cost per pound ($/lb)

    2.18

    2.60

    2.05

    2.35

    3.23

    Add: Sustaining capital         

    60.5

    35.3

    25.2

    4.0

    Royalties

    3.6

    9.3

    1.6

    3.9

    Reclamation and other closure accretion and depreciation

    1.9

    1.1

    2.7

    1.6

    Leases & other

    3.0

    18.6

    0.8

    1.5

    All-in sustaining cost

    212.9

    235.6

    67.9

    25.4

    AISC per pound ($/lb)

    3.22

    3.58

    3.72

    5.71

    1 Includes immaterial amounts related to other segments.

    2 By-product credits are presented net of the associated treatment and refining charges.

    Three months ended June 30, 2024

    Discontinued Operations

    Neves-Corvo

    Zinkgruvan

    Total –
    discontinued
    operations

    ($ millions, unless otherwise noted)

    (Cu)

    (Zn)

    Sales volumes (Contained metal):

    Tonnes

    7,898

    18,510

    Pounds (000s)

    17,412

    40,808

    Production costs

    83.1

    32.7

    115.9

    Less: Royalties and other

    (1.8)

    (1.8)

    81.3

    32.7

    114.1

    Deduct: By-product credits1

    (58.1)

    (27.8)

    (85.9)

    Add: Treatment and refining charges

    6.5

    10.8

    17.3

    Cash cost

    29.7

    15.7

    45.5

    Cash cost per pound ($/lb)

    1.70

    0.39

    Add: Sustaining capital expenditure

    27.9

    13.3

    Royalties

    1.2

    Reclamation and other closure accretion and depreciation

    1.3

    1.0

    Leases and other

    0.2

    0.1

    All-in sustaining cost

    60.3

    30.1

    AISC per pound ($/lb)

    3.46

    0.74

    1 By-product credits are presented net of the associated treatment and refining charges.

     

    Six months ended June 30, 2025

    Continuing Operations

    Candelaria

    Caserones

    Chapada

    Consolidated

    Eagle

    Total –
    continuing
    operations1

    ($ millions, unless otherwise noted)

    (Cu)

    (Cu)

    (Cu) 

    (Cu)

    (Ni)

    Sales volumes (Contained metal):

    Tonnes                    

    71,577

    66,257

    18,630

    156,464

    3,974

    Pounds (000s)

    157,800

    146,072

    41,072

    344,944

    8,761

    Production costs     

    358.2

    448.7

    138.5

    945.3

    77.5

    1,023.5

    Less: Royalties and other

    (5.0)

    (23.4)

    (11.3)

    (39.7)

    (9.2)

    (49.6)

    353.2

    425.3

    127.2

    905.6

    68.3

    973.9

    Deduct: By-product credits2

    (86.3)

    (68.4)

    (86.1)

    (240.9)

    (43.2)

    (284.1)

    Add: Treatment and refining

    13.8

    6.7

    3.1

    23.7

    23.7

    Cash cost

    280.7

    363.5

    44.2

    688.4

    25.1

    713.5

    Cash cost per pound ($/lb)

    1.78

    2.49

    1.08

    2.00

    2.86

    Add: Sustaining capital         

    98.0

    70.1

    49.6

    10.8

    Royalties

    7.5

    18.4

    5.6

    6.3

    Reclamation and other closure accretion and depreciation

    4.1

    2.6

    3.4

    2.4

    Leases & other

    3.1

    34.6

    2.1

    1.8

    All-in sustaining cost

    393.4

    489.2

    104.9

    46.4

    AISC per pound ($/lb)

    2.49

    3.35

    2.55

    5.29

    1 Includes immaterial amounts related to other segments.

    2 By-product credits are presented net of the associated treatment and refining charges.

    Six months ended June 30, 2025

    Discontinued Operations1

    Neves-Corvo

    Zinkgruvan

    Total –
    discontinued
    operations

    ($ millions, unless otherwise noted)

    (Cu)

    (Zn)

    Sales volumes (Contained metal):

    Tonnes                    

    6,745

    20,698

    Pounds (000s)

    14,870

    45,631

    Production costs     

    90.2

    36.9

    127.1

    Less: Royalties and other

    (1.3)

    (1.3)

    88.9

    36.9

    125.8

    Deduct: By-product credits2

    (67.0)

    (23.3)

    (90.3)

    Add: Treatment and refining

    5.4

    7.2

    12.6

    Cash cost

    27.4

    20.8

    48.1

    Cash cost per pound ($/lb)

    1.84

    0.46

    Add: Sustaining capital         

    27.7

    30.4

    Royalties

    1.2

    Reclamation and other closure accretion and depreciation

    0.7

    0.3

    Leases & other

    0.9

    All-in sustaining cost

    57.9

    51.5

    AISC per pound ($/lb)

    3.89

    1.13

    1 Discontinued operations results are to April 16, 2025.

    2 By-product credits are presented net of the associated treatment and refining charges.

     

    Six months ended June 30, 2024

    Continuing Operations

    Candelaria

    Caserones

    Chapada

    Consolidated

    Eagle

    Total –
    continuing
    operations1

    ($ millions, unless otherwise noted)

    (Cu)

    (Cu)

    (Cu) 

    (Cu)

    (Ni)

    Sales volumes (Contained metal):

    Tonnes                    

    63,535

    65,073

    17,035

    145,643

    4,181

    Pounds (000s)

    140,071

    143,461

    37,556

    321,088

    9,218

    Production costs     

    336.6

    406.6

    133.8

    877.0

    78.2

    955.9

    Less: Royalties and other

    (7.1)

    (18.1)

    (6.4)

    (31.5)

    (6.9)

    (39.2)

    329.5

    388.5

    127.4

    845.5

    71.3

    916.7

    Deduct: By-product credits2

    (70.4)

    (72.1)

    (58.6)

    (201.1)

    (38.3)

    (239.4)

    Add: Treatment and refining

    24.2

    21.4

    7.5

    53.1

    0.6

    53.7

    Cash cost

    283.4

    337.7

    76.3

    697.4

    33.6

    731.1

    Cash cost per pound ($/lb)

    2.02

    2.35

    2.03

    2.17

    3.65

    Add: Sustaining capital         

    160.1

    78.1

    54.4

    8.1

    Royalties

    6.5

    18.1

    3.2

    6.6

    Reclamation and other closure

    4.0

    2.1

    5.4

    3.6

    Leases & other

    6.1

    34.0

    1.5

    2.8

    All-in sustaining cost

    460.1

    470.0

    140.9

    54.6

    AISC per pound ($/lb)

    3.28

    3.28

    3.75

    5.92

    1 Includes immaterial amounts related to other segments.

    2 By-product credits are presented net of the associated treatment and refining charges.

    Six months ended June 30, 2024

    Discontinued Operations

    Neves-Corvo

    Zinkgruvan

    Total –
    discontinued
    operations

    ($ millions, unless otherwise noted)

    (Cu)

    (Zn)

    Sales volumes (Contained metal):

    Tonnes

    13,784

    34,335

    Pounds (000s)

    30,388

    75,696

    Production costs

    154.8

    62.8

    217.7

    Less: Royalties and other

    (3.1)

    (3.1)

    151.7

    62.8

    214.6

    Deduct: By-product credits1

    (92.0)

    (44.0)

    (136.0)

    Add: Treatment and refining charges

    12.1

    19.7

    31.8

    Cash cost

    71.7

    38.6

    110.3

    Cash cost per pound ($/lb)

    2.36

    0.51

    Add: Sustaining capital expenditure

    50.3

    27.6

    Royalties

    1.9

    Reclamation and other closure accretion and depreciation

    2.7

    2.1

    Leases and other

    0.3

    0.2

    All-in sustaining cost

    126.9

    68.5

    AISC per pound ($/lb)

    4.18

    0.91

    1 By-product credits are presented net of the associated treatment and refining charges.

    Adjusted EBITDA can be reconciled to Net Earnings (Loss) as follows:

    Three months ended

    June 30,

    Six months ended

    June 30,

    ($ millions)

    2025

    2024

    2025

    2024

    Net earnings — continuing operations

    159.6

    119.4

    340.9

    202.5

    Add back:

    Depreciation, depletion and amortization

    159.3

    159.2

    297.4

    308.6

    Finance costs, net

    20.4

    33.2

    64.3

    66.4

    Income taxes expense

    69.6

    47.3

    120.4

    104.0

    EBITDA — continuing operations

    408.9

    359.0

    823.0

    681.4

    Unrealized foreign exchange loss (gain)

    (1.5)

    3.2

    7.8

    (11.6)

    Unrealized losses (gains) on derivative contracts

    (10.7)

    (6.7)

    (46.7)

    27.2

    Ojos del Salado sinkhole expenses (recoveries)

    0.1

    0.7

    1.2

    (0.3)

    Revaluation gain on marketable securities

    (2.1)

    (0.1)

    (1.6)

    (2.5)

    Gain on partial disposal and contribution to Vicuña

    (3.0)

    Partial suspension of underground operations at Eagle

    9.8

    9.8

    Revaluation of Caserones purchase option

    (12.4)

    (11.7)

    Write-down of assets

    17.2

    17.2

    Other

    0.1

    (0.8)

    2.0

    (1.0)

    Total adjustments — EBITDA

    (14.2)

    10.8

    (40.4)

    26.9

    Adjusted EBITDA — continuing operations

    394.7

    369.9

    782.6

    708.3

    Including discontinued operations:

    Net earnings — discontinued operations

    102.4

    37.3

    88.7

    12.8

    Add back:

    Depreciation, depletion and amortization

    38.5

    73.5

    Finance costs, net

    0.4

    3.2

    4.8

    5.6

    Income taxes expense

    (1.2)

    8.8

    5.3

    2.7

    EBITDA — discontinued operations

    101.6

    87.8

    98.7

    94.7

    Unrealized foreign exchange loss (gain)

    2.5

    1.5

    (0.7)

    Unrealized losses (gains) on derivative contracts

    2.8

    (0.1)

    21.7

    Asset impairment

    65.7

    Gain on disposal of subsidiaries

    (106.4)

    (106.4)

    Contingent consideration revaluation

    3.1

    3.1

    Other

    0.3

    0.4

    1.3

    (0.4)

    Total adjustments — EBITDA discontinued operations

    (100.6)

    3.2

    (34.8)

    20.6

    Adjusted EBITDA — discontinued operations

    1.0

    91.0

    63.9

    115.4

    Adjusted EBITDA (all operations)

    395.8

    460.9

    846.5

    823.7

    Adjusted Earnings and Adjusted EPS can be reconciled to Net Earnings (Loss) Attributable to Lundin Mining Shareholders as follows:

    Three months ended

    June 30,

    Six months ended

    June 30,

    ($ millions, except share and per share amounts)

    2025

    2024

    2025

    2024

    Net earnings attributable to Lundin Mining shareholders — continuing operations

    126.1

    84.3

    264.1

    122.7

    Add back:

    Total adjustments – EBITDA

    (14.2)

    10.8

    (40.4)

    26.9

    Tax effect on adjustments

    0.2

    3.8

    (4.5)

    6.2

    Deferred tax expense due to change in tax rate

    Recognition of Caserones Tax Asset

    Deferred tax arising from foreign exchange translation

    (13.5)

    (13.7)

    (34.7)

    (20.0)

    Deferred tax arising from partial disposal and contribution to Vicuña

    9.0

    Non-controlling interest on adjustments

    (0.4)

    (1.8)

    (1.5)

    4.0

    Total adjustments

    (27.9)

    (0.9)

    (72.1)

    17.1

    Adjusted earnings — continuing operations

    98.2

    83.4

    192.1

    139.7

    Including discontinued operations:

    Net earnings attributable to Lundin Mining shareholders – discontinued operations1

    102.4

    37.3

    88.7

    12.8

    Add back:

    Total adjustments – EBITDA – discontinued operations

    (100.6)

    3.2

    (34.8)

    20.6

    Tax effect on adjustments

    (0.2)

    (1.8)

    0.1

    (6.0)

    Total adjustments

    (100.7)

    1.4

    (34.7)

    14.7

    Adjusted earnings — discontinued operations

    1.7

    38.7

    53.9

    27.6

    Adjusted earnings (all operations)

    99.9

    122.1

    246.1

    167.3

    Basic weighted average number of shares outstanding

    856,788,215

    776,173,888

    854,532,557

    774,033,611

    Net earnings attributable to Lundin Mining shareholders – continuing operations

    0.15

    0.11

    0.31

    0.16

    Total adjustments

    (0.03)

    (0.08)

    0.02

    Adjusted EPS — continuing operations

    0.11

    0.11

    0.22

    0.18

    Net earnings attributable to Lundin Mining shareholders – discontinued operations

    0.12

    0.05

    0.10

    0.02

    Total adjustments

    (0.12)

    (0.04)

    0.02

    Adjusted EPS — discontinued operations

    0.05

    0.06

    0.04

    Net earnings attributable to Lundin Mining shareholders

    0.27

    0.16

    0.41

    0.18

    Total adjustments

    (0.15)

    (0.13)

    0.04

    Adjusted EPS (all operations)

    0.12

    0.16

    0.29

    0.22

    Represents Net earnings attributable to Lundin Mining Corporation shareholders less Net earnings from continuing operations attributable to Lundin Mining Corporation shareholders.

    Free Cash Flow from Operations and Free Cash Flow can be reconciled to Cash provided by Operating Activities on the Company’s Condensed Interim Consolidated Statements of Cash Flows as follows:                                                  

    Three months ended

    June 30,

    Six months ended

    June 30,

    ($ millions)

    2025

    2024

    2025

    2024

    Cash provided by operating activities related to continuing operations

    314.6

    440.0

    436.9

    672.3

    Sustaining capital expenditures

    (115.9)

    (126.6)

    (228.5)

    (303.1)

    General exploration and business development

    12.4

    11.3

    24.2

    22.1

    Free cash flow from operations — continuing operations

    211.1

    324.7

    232.6

    391.3

    General exploration and business development

    (12.4)

    (11.3)

    (24.2)

    (22.1)

    Expansionary capital expenditures

    (33.7)

    (87.1)

    (96.6)

    (143.1)

    Free cash flow — continuing operations

    165.0

    226.3

    111.8

    226.1

    Cash provided by operating activities related to discontinued operations

    20.0

    51.8

    74.5

    87.0

    Sustaining capital expenditures

    (9.1)

    (41.2)

    (58.1)

    (78.0)

    General exploration and business development

    0.6

    2.3

    5.4

    4.9

    Free cash flow from operations — discontinued operations

    11.5

    12.9

    21.8

    13.9

    General exploration and business development

    (0.6)

    (2.3)

    (5.4)

    (4.9)

    Free cash flow — discontinued operations

    10.9

    10.6

    16.4

    9.0

    Free cash flow from operations (all operations)

    222.6

    337.6

    254.4

    405.2

    Free cash flow (all operations)

    175.9

    236.9

    128.2

    235.1

    Adjusted Operating Cash Flow and Adjusted Operating Cash Flow per Share can be reconciled to Cash Provided by Operating Activities on the Company’s Condensed Interim Consolidated Statements of Cash Flows as follows:

    Three months ended

    June 30,

    Six months ended

    June 30,

    ($ millions, except share and per share amounts)

    2025

    2024

    2025

    2024

    Cash provided by operating activities related to continuing operations

    314.6

    440.0

    436.9

    672.3

    Changes in non-cash working capital items

    (37.4)

    (148.8)

    177.3

    (87.0)

    Adjusted operating cash flow — continuing operations

    277.2

    291.2

    614.2

    585.3

    Cash provided by operating activities related to discontinued operations

    20.0

    51.8

    74.5

    87.0

    Changes in non-cash working capital items

    (17.8)

    26.9

    (16.7)

    11.3

    Adjusted operating cash flow — discontinued operations

    2.2

    78.7

    57.8

    98.3

    Adjusted operating cash flow (all operations)

    279.4

    369.9

    672.0

    683.6

    Basic weighted average number of shares outstanding

    856,788,215

    776,173,888

    854,532,557

    774,033,611

    Adjusted operating cash flow per share — continuing operations

    $              0.32

    0.38

    $              0.72

    0.76

    Adjusted operating cash flow per share — discontinued operations

    $              0.00

    0.10

    $              0.06

    0.13

    Adjusted operating cash flow per share (all operations)

    $              0.33

    0.48

    $              0.79

    0.89

    Net debt and net debt excluding lease liabilities can be reconciled to Debt and Lease Liabilities, Current Portion of Debt and Lease Liabilities and Cash and Cash Equivalents on the Company’s Condensed Interim Consolidated Balance Sheets as follows:                               

    ($ millions), continuing operations

    June 30, 2025

    December 31, 2024

    Debt and lease liabilities

    (415.1)

    (1,610.9)

    Current portion of debt and lease liabilities

    (239.9)

    (395.2)

    Less deferred financing fees (netted in above)

    (4.5)

    (7.7)

    Add debt and lease liabilities related to liabilities classified as held-for-sale

    (16.3)

    (659.5)

    (2,030.1)

    Cash and cash equivalents

    279.3

    357.5

    Add cash and cash equivalents related to assets classified as held-for-sale

    74.8

    Net debt

    (380.2)

    (1,597.8)

    Lease liabilities

    245.1

    249.1

    Lease liabilities related to liabilities classified as held-for-sale

    16.3

    Net debt excluding lease liabilities

    (135.1)

    (1,332.4)

    Cautionary Statement on Forward-Looking Information

    Certain of the statements made and information contained herein are “forward-looking information” within the meaning of applicable Canadian securities laws. All statements other than statements of historical facts included in this document constitute forward-looking information, including but not limited to statements regarding the Company’s plans, prospects, business strategies and strategic vision and aspirations and their achievement and timing; the Company’s guidance on the timing and amount of future production and its expectations regarding the results of operations; expected financial performance, including expected costs and expenditures and other financial metrics; expected metal prices and foreign exchange rates; the Company’s growth and optimization initiatives and expansionary projects, and the potential costs, outcomes, results and impacts thereof and timing thereof; permitting requirements and timelines; timing and possible outcome of pending litigation; the results of any Preliminary Economic Assessment, Pre-Feasibility Study, Feasibility Study, or Mineral Resource and Mineral Reserve estimations, life of mine estimates, and mine and mine closure plans; anticipated market prices of metals, currency exchange rates and interest rates; the Company’s shareholder distribution policy, including with respect to share buybacks and the payment and amount of dividends and the timing thereof; the development and implementation of the Company’s Responsible Mining Management System; the Company’s liquidity, contractual obligations, commitments and contingencies, and the Company’s capital resources and adequacy thereof; the Company’s ability to comply with contractual and permitting or other regulatory requirements; anticipated exploration and development activities, including potential outcomes, results, impacts and timing thereof; the Company’s integration of acquisitions and expansions and any anticipated benefits thereof, including the anticipated project development and other plans and expectations with respect to the Vicuña Project and the 50/50  joint arrangement with BHP; mineral resource estimation for the Vicuña Project, including the parameters and assumptions related thereto; the operation of Vicuña with BHP; the realization of synergies and economies of scale in the Vicuña district; the development and future operation of the Vicuña Project; the timing and expectations for future studies and technical reports with respect to the Company’s operations and projects, including the Vicuña Project and the Saúva Project; the potential for resource expansion; the terms of the contingent payments in respect of the completion of the sale of the Company’s European assets and expectations related thereto; the earn-in arrangement in respect of the Boulderdash properties, including the entering into of an option agreement in respect thereof and the terms of such option agreement; future actions taken by Talon Metals Corp. and Lundin Mining in relation to the Boulderdash properties and the outcomes and anticipated benefits thereof; and expectations for other economic, business, and/or competitive factors. Words such as “believe”, “expect”, “anticipate”, “contemplate”, “target”, “plan”, “goal”, “aim”, “intend”, “continue”, “budget”, “estimate”, “may”, “will”, “can”, “could”, “should”, “schedule” and similar expressions identify forward-looking information.

    Forward-looking information is necessarily based upon various estimates and assumptions including, without limitation, the expectations and beliefs of management, including that the Company can access financing, appropriate equipment and sufficient labour; assumed and future price of copper, gold, zinc, nickel and other metals; anticipated costs; currency exchange rates and interest rates; ability to achieve goals; the prompt and effective integration of acquisitions and the realization of synergies and economies of scale in connection therewith; that the political, economic, permitting and legal environment in which the Company operates will continue to support the development and operation of mining projects; timing and receipt of governmental, regulatory and third party approvals, consents, licenses and permits and their renewals; positive relations with local groups; the accuracy of Mineral Resource and Mineral Reserve estimates and related information, analyses and interpretations; and such other assumptions as set out herein as well as those related to the factors set forth below. While these factors and assumptions are considered reasonable by Lundin Mining as at the date of this document in light of management’s experience and perception of current conditions and expected developments, such information is inherently subject to significant business, economic, political, regulatory and competitive uncertainties and contingencies. Known and unknown factors could cause actual results to differ materially from those projected in the forward-looking information and undue reliance should not be placed on such information. Such factors include, but are not limited to: dependence on international market prices and demand for the metals that the Company produces; political, economic, and regulatory uncertainty in operating jurisdictions, including but not limited to those related to permitting and approvals, nationalization or expropriation without fair compensation, environmental and tailings management, labour, trade relations, and transportation; operating jurisdictions, including but not limited to those related to permitting and approvals, nationalization or expropriation without fair compensation, environmental and tailings management, labour, trade relations, and transportation; risks relating to mine closure and reclamation obligations; health and safety hazards; inherent risks of mining, not all of which related risk events are insurable; risks relating to tailings and waste management facilities; risks relating to the Company’s indebtedness; challenges and conflicts that may arise in partnerships and joint operations; risks relating to development projects, including Filo del Sol and Josemaria; risks that revenue may be significantly impacted in the event of any production stoppages or reputational damage in Chile; the impact of global financial conditions, market volatility and inflation; business interruptions caused by critical infrastructure failures; challenges of effective water management; exposure to greater foreign exchange and capital controls, as well as political, social and economic risks as a result of the Company’s operation in emerging markets; risks relating to stakeholder opposition to continued operation, further development, or new development of the Company’s projects and mines; any breach or failure information systems; risks relating to reliance on estimates of future production; risks relating to litigation and administrative proceedings which the Company may be subject to from time to time; risks relating to acquisitions or business arrangements; risks relating to competition in the industry; failure to comply with existing or new laws or changes in laws; challenges or defects in title or termination of mining or exploitation concessions; the exclusive jurisdiction of foreign courts; the outbreak of infectious diseases or viruses; risks relating to taxation changes; receipt of and ability to maintain all permits that are required for operation; minor elements contained in concentrate products; changes in the relationship with its employees and contractors; the Company’s Mineral Reserves and Mineral Resources which are estimates only; uncertainties relating to inferred Mineral Resources being converted into Measured or Indicated Mineral Resources; payment of dividends in the future; compliance with environmental, health and safety laws and regulations, including changes to such laws or regulations; interests of significant shareholders of the Company; asset values being subject to impairment charges; potential for conflicts of interest and public association with other Lundin Group companies or entities; activist shareholders and proxy solicitation firms; risks associated with climate change; the Company’s common shares being subject to dilution; ability to attract and retain highly skilled employees; reliance on key personnel and reporting and oversight systems; risks relating to the Company’s internal controls; counterparty and customer concentration risk;  risks associated with the use of derivatives; exchange rate fluctuations; the terms of the contingent payments in respect of the completion of the sale of the Company’s European assets and expectations related thereto; the earn-in arrangement in respect of the Boulderdash properties, including the entering into of an option agreement in respect thereof and the terms of such option agreement; future actions taken by Talon Metals Corp. and Lundin Mining in relation to the Boulderdash properties and the outcomes and anticipated benefits thereof; and other risks and uncertainties, including but not limited to those described in the “Risks and Uncertainties” section of the Company’s MD&A for the three and six months ended June 30, 2025, the “Risks and Uncertainties” section of the Company’s MD&A for the year ended December 31, 2024, and the “Risks and Uncertainties” section of the Company’s Annual Information Form for the year ended December 31, 2024, which are available on SEDAR+ at www.sedarplus.ca under the Company’s profile.

    All of the forward-looking information in this document is qualified by these cautionary statements. Although the Company has attempted to identify important factors that could cause actual results to differ materially from those contained in forward-looking information, there may be other factors that cause results not to be as anticipated, estimated, forecasted or intended and readers are cautioned that the foregoing list is not exhaustive of all factors and assumptions which may have been used. Should one or more of these risks and uncertainties materialize, or should underlying assumptions prove incorrect, actual results may vary materially from those described in forward-looking information. Accordingly, there can be no assurance that forward-looking information will prove to be accurate and forward-looking information is not a guarantee of future performance. Readers are advised not to place undue reliance on forward-looking information. The forward-looking information contained herein speaks only as of the date of this document. The Company disclaims any intention or obligation to update or revise forwardlooking information or to explain any material difference between such and subsequent actual events, except as required by applicable law.

    Lundin Mining Reports Second Quarter 2025 Results (CNW Group/Lundin Mining Corporation)

    SOURCE Lundin Mining Corporation

    For further information, please contact: Stephen Williams, Vice President, Investor Relations +1 604 806 3074; Robert Eriksson, Investor Relations Sweden: +46 8 440 54 40

    Continue Reading

  • 6 Foods with More Fiber Than Beans

    6 Foods with More Fiber Than Beans

    • Chia seeds, avocados and raspberries are tasty, high-fiber alternatives to beans.
    • Green peas, lentils and artichokes offer fiber plus protein and gut health benefits.
    • Easy swaps like adding seeds, legumes or veggies can help you meet daily fiber needs.

    Beans are well known for their fiber, and for good reason. One half-cup of cooked black beans provides around 7.7 grams of fiber, which is a solid start toward the recommended daily intake. According to the 2020–2025 Dietary Guidelines for Americans, adults should aim for the following:

    • Women ages 19-50 years: 25-28 grams per day
    • Women 51 years and older: 22 grams per day
    • Men ages 19-50 years: 31-34 grams per day
    • Men 51 and older: 28 grams per day

    But what if you’re not a fan of beans? Don’t worry, there are plenty of other fiber-rich foods that can help you meet your daily needs. While beans offer a lot of fiber in just a small portion, these other foods can still offer impressive amounts of fiber per serving. Whether you’re looking to shake things up or just want more variety, these six foods bring big fiber benefits—no beans required.

    1. Chia Seeds 

    1 oz (about 2 tablespoons) = 9.75 grams of fiber

    Chia seeds may be small, but they’re surprisingly nutrient-dense. Just two tablespoons provide 9.75 grams of fiber, plus plant-based omega-3s and protein so they’re super satisfying, support heart health and help reduce inflammation. These seeds absorb liquid and form a gel-like texture, which makes them ideal for smoothies, oatmeal and creamy desserts. “Try mixing them into overnight oats, sprinkling over nut butter toast or using them in a berry chia pudding,” says Sheila Patterson, RD, CDCES.

    2. Avocado 

    1 avocado = 9.25 grams of fiber

    Avocados are known for their creamy texture and heart-healthy fats, but they also contain an impressive amount of fiber—about 9 grams per avocado, or roughly 5 grams per half. Plus, they’re easy to incorporate into meals in a variety of ways. “Avocados are extremely versatile,” says Jaime Bachtell-Shelbert, RDN, LDN. “Use them in dips and dressings, spread on toast, add to smoothies or toss into salads for a fiber upgrade.”

    3. Green Peas 

    1 cup (cooked) = 8.8 grams of fiber

    Adding green peas to your meals is an easy and cost-effective way to boost your fiber intake. One cup of cooked peas offers more fiber than a half-cup of black beans, plus about 9 grams of plant-based protein. “Green peas contain both soluble and insoluble fiber that support beneficial bacteria in the gut and contribute to a more diverse gut microbiome,” says Bachtell-Shelbert. She recommends blending them into pesto for a subtly sweet, fiber-rich boost. Patterson also suggests pureeing green peas with chickpeas and herbs to make a delicious, nutrient-packed dip.

    4. Artichokes

    1 artichoke = 8.75 grams of fiber

    Artichokes are one of the highest-fiber vegetables; yet, they’re often overlooked. But you don’t have to prepare fresh artichokes to enjoy their benefits. Choosing canned artichokes can make them a quick and easy add to a variety of meals. Their mild, earthy flavor works well in many different dishes. “Add chopped artichoke hearts on top of pizza on pizza night,” suggests Katharine Rosenthal, RDN. They’re also great tossed into grain bowls, stirred into pasta or roasted as a simple side.

    5. Raspberries 

    1 cup = 8 grams of fiber

    Raspberries are one of the highest-fiber fruits and they offer a sweet, tangy flavor that works well in everything from breakfast to dessert. “They’re not only rich in fiber, but also are packed with antioxidants and polyphenols, which support immune and neurological function,” says Patterson. Toss them into a yogurt bowl, enjoy them on their own or “use fresh raspberries to make a homemade raspberry jam,” suggests Rosenthal.

    6. Lentils 

    1/2 cup (cooked) = 7.8 grams of fiber

    Lentils are a fiber-rich legume that cook faster than many other dried beans, making them a convenient addition to your pantry. Just a half-cup of cooked lentils provides nearly 8 grams of fiber, along with plant-based protein and iron. Their nutty and mild flavor pairs easily with spices, herbs and vegetables. Add them to soups and stews, toss them into a warm grain bowl or stir into pasta sauces for an easy way to boost both fiber and flavor.

    Fiber-Rich Recipes to Try

    Our Expert Take 

    Fiber doesn’t have to come from beans alone. From chia seeds and raspberries to green peas and avocados, there are plenty of delicious ways to add fiber to your plate. These foods aren’t just high in fiber, they’re also versatile, easy to prep and packed with nutrients that support your overall health. As our dietitians shared, small tweaks like adding lentils to soup or tossing peas into pasta can make a big difference. The key is finding fiber-rich foods you actually enjoy and working them into meals you’re already making.

    Continue Reading

  • Closing date this week for first international optical technologies awards

    Closing date this week for first international optical technologies awards

    The closing date to enter the best in commercial optical security technologies for the first ‘Excellence in Optical Technologies Awards’ has been announced.

    Recognising advancement and technical achievement in technologies such as holography, micro-lens arrays, micro-mirrors, plasmonics, nano-gratings, colour change, caustics, polarisation, photonic crystals, special print-generated effects, or a combination of all of these, the awards are organised by the new global trade body, the International Optical Technologies Association (formerly the International Hologram Manufacturers Association).

    Nominations will be accepted up to 8 August, and entries will be judged by a panel of experts in authentication, design and optical security, including the IOTA Board.

    The awards will be presented at the annual Optical & Digital Document Security Conference – the highly respected technical conference for physical, digital and virtual document security, which takes place from 15 – 17 September in Warsaw, Poland.

    Involving delegates from suppliers, manufacturers, and users from around the world, the awards recognise outstanding achievement and progress, marking those who have been at the forefront of some of the most significant sector developments in recent times.

    They reflect innovative or commercially viable optical security products or techniques which have been introduced or launched since September 2023. Any company or individual is eligible to enter the award categories covering:

    Best Innovation in Optically Variable Technologies

    • Best Origination
    • Best Disruptive Technology
    • Best Integrated Technology / Best Document Security Application
    • Best Product Security Application
    • Best Decorative/Packaging Product

    In addition, a Lifetime Achievement Award will be presented to the individual who has made a special contribution to the industry throughout their career.

    Dr Mark Deakes (pictured), chair of IOTA, said: “These inaugural awards are a landmark moment for the optical security industry. They recognise not only the best in design and technical excellence, but also the spirit of innovation that drives our sector forward. Optical technologies continue to play a vital role in protecting brands, securing identities, and defending against counterfeiting.

    “Through these awards, we aim to celebrate the groundbreaking ideas, commercial impact, and creative applications that are shaping the future of optical security. We encourage entries from across the globe to showcase the strength and diversity of this dynamic industry.”

    Those involved in a project can still enter, while others can nominate optical solutions projects for an award if they provide details of the user or producer of the technology. More information at https://iot-association.org/excellence-in-optical-technologies-awards/ while the link to the nomination site itself is  https://iota.awardsplatform.com/

    The International Optical Technologies Association – www.iot-association.org/ – is made up of the world’s leading holography, micro-lens arrays, micro-mirrors, plasmonics, nano-gratings, colour change, caustics, polarisation, photonic crystals, special print-generated effects, or a combination of these manufacturers, suppliers and convertors. These technologies are used in a wide range of banknote security, anti-counterfeiting, brand protection, packaging, graphics and other commercial applications around the world. Member companies actively cooperate to maintain the highest professional, security and quality standards.

     


    Continue Reading

  • Heart Age Calculator Reveals Many Are Living With Premature Aging

    Heart Age Calculator Reveals Many Are Living With Premature Aging

    A new study suggests many people have a heart that’s biologically at least a decade older than their chronological age, putting them at increased risk for heart attacks and strokes. The findings were published in JAMA Cardiology.

    “Even though many people in their thirties or forties may feel ‘too young’ to worry about their risk for heart disease, we know that risk can often be silent until it is too late,” says senior study author Sadiya Khan, MD, a cardiologist and associate professor at the Northwestern University Feinberg School of Medicine in Chicago.

    Heart Age Calculator Revealed Hidden Risk

    Dr. Khan and her team arrived at these findings, published in JAMA Cardiology, by developing a heart age calculator to determine how heart-disease risk is affected by a wide variety of factors, including:

    • Health issues like high blood pressure and elevated cholesterol
    • Lifestyle characteristics like exercise habits and smoking status
    • Socioeconomic issues like poverty or limited education

    Then, the scientists calculated heart risk for more than 14,000 people between 30 and 79 years old who had no history of heart disease.

    Continue Reading

  • Does your morning coffee or tea really boost your mood? Here’s what science says

    Does your morning coffee or tea really boost your mood? Here’s what science says

    New research shows your morning cup of caffeine can lift your spirits, but when and how you drink it, and who you’re with, makes all the difference.

    Study: The association of caffeine consumption with positive affect but not with negative affect changes across the day. Image Credit: Brian A Jackson / Shutterstock

    In a recent article published in the journal Scientific Reports, researchers investigated the relationship between caffeine consumption and emotional states in everyday life, examining whether this relationship varies by context, individual characteristics, and time of day.

    They found that caffeine intake was generally followed by a small-to-moderate increase in positive emotions, particularly when consumed within the first 2.5 hours after waking up, with a smaller but significant uptick around 10–12.5 hours after waking, though social context and tiredness influenced the strength of these associations.

    Background

    Caffeine is widely consumed worldwide and is known for its ability to boost mood, performance, and alertness. While laboratory studies support these benefits, less is known about how caffeine affects emotional states in real-world settings.

    Caffeine acts as a stimulant by blocking adenosine, a brain chemical that promotes drowsiness and is linked to depression and anxiety. By preventing adenosine from working, caffeine boosts noradrenaline and dopamine, likely enhancing mood.

    These effects could be strongest in the morning when people are most tired and vulnerable to sleep inertia. However, some evidence suggests that caffeine may also cause anxiety or sleep disturbances, especially in sensitive individuals or when consumed in high doses or later in the day. Moreover, emotional responses to caffeine may be shaped not just by biology but by context, such as whether it is consumed alone or socially.

    In this study, researchers set out to explore how caffeine intake influences momentary emotional experiences, referred to as affect, during daily life. The researchers also explored how this relationship is shaped by factors like time of day, individual variations in sleep quality, caffeine dependence, mental health, and social context.

    About the Study

    The researchers hypothesized that caffeine would be associated with increased positive and decreased negative affect and that these effects would be strongest shortly after waking. The other questions were exploratory due to limited prior research.

    To test these hypotheses, they analyzed data from two experience sampling method (ESM) studies conducted in Germany. Participants aged 18–25 in the first study and 18–29 in the second study were recruited and asked to complete short smartphone-based surveys multiple times a day for two to four weeks.

    The first study lasted 15 days, while the second study lasted 29 days. Participants reported whether they had consumed caffeine in the past 90 minutes, along with their mood, tiredness, sleep, social context, and daily routine. Surveys were randomly scheduled throughout the day, with a minimum 90-minute gap between prompts.

    Baseline measures included typical caffeine intake (converted to mg using standard values), caffeine dependence, depressive symptoms, anxiety, and sleep quality. Participants also completed daily sleep diaries.

    In total, 115 participants from the first study and 121 from the second study provided sufficient data. Multilevel models were used to test associations between caffeine intake and affective states, controlling for variables like sleep duration and timing. Moderators such as time of day, tiredness, social setting, workday status, and individual traits were examined.

    Key Findings

    Across both studies, participants reported consuming caffeine in approximately 16% of their surveys. Multilevel analyses revealed that caffeine consumption was significantly associated with higher momentary positive affect in both studies.

    This association varied between individuals, particularly linked to increased feelings of enthusiasm in both samples and happiness and contentment in the second study. Caffeine was associated with lower negative affect only in the second study, including reduced feelings of sadness and upset, though not for worry, and the effect was small and inconsistent across studies.

    The strength of the caffeine-positive affect link depended on time since awakening, with the most pronounced effects occurring within the first 2.5 hours after waking, declining thereafter, and showing a smaller but significant increase around 10–12.5 hours after waking. No time-of-day effects were observed for negative affect.

    Individual differences such as caffeine dependency, habitual intake, depression, anxiety, or sleep quality did not moderate the caffeine-affect relationship.

    However, momentary tiredness (current and prior) enhanced caffeine’s positive mood effects, while being around others reduced them. No contextual or physiological moderators influenced negative affect.

    Conclusions

    This study provides real-world evidence that caffeine enhances positive affect, especially shortly after waking, with no consistent or robust effects on negative affect. The morning effect remained strong even when using different time metrics (clock time, sleep midpoint). Notably, individual traits like caffeine sensitivity or mental health symptoms did not moderate these associations, while situational factors such as tiredness and social context did.

    The findings suggest that caffeine’s mood-enhancing effects are strongest in the morning, potentially due to habitual consumption patterns, though the withdrawal reversal hypothesis remains contested in the literature, given evidence of mood boosts in non-habitual users or circadian rhythm influences. The second study’s stronger and more consistent effects are likely due to its larger sample size and timing during fewer pandemic-related restrictions compared to the first study.

    However, limitations include reliance on self-reported data, a young and gender-skewed sample, a lack of exact caffeine timing, and no direct assessment of chronotype. Future studies should explore first daily consumption, withdrawal symptoms, and objective circadian measures.

    In conclusion, caffeine is reliably linked to increased positive mood, especially in the morning, influenced more by contextual states than stable individual traits.

    Journal reference:

    • The association of caffeine consumption with positive affect but not with negative affect changes across the day. Hachenberger, J., Li, Y., Realo, A., Lemola, S. Scientific Reports (2025). DOI: 10.1038/s41598-025-14317-0, https://www.nature.com/articles/s41598-025-14317-0

    Continue Reading

  • Academy of Motion Picture Arts and Sciences Launches the Next Chapter of ACES with the Academy Software Foundation

    The open source Academy Color Encoding System (ACES) is the industry standard for managing color throughout the life cycle of a motion picture or television production.
     

    LOS ANGELES, August 6, 2025 – The Academy of Motion Picture Arts and Sciences and the Academy Software Foundation (ASWF) today announced that the Academy Color Encoding System (ACES), the global standard for color management, is joining the ASWF, a home for open source software developers in the motion picture and broader industries.

    Developed and maintained by the Academy of Motion Picture Arts and Sciences for more than a decade, ACES is an open source framework for color management and image interchange across the entire motion picture production life cycle, from on-set acquisition, visual effects, post-production, mastering, and archiving. It has become the global standard for ensuring a consistent color experience and maintaining creative vision, used on films including Captain America: Brave New World, The Wild Robot, Wicked, and more. The release of ACES 2.0 this past spring introduced numerous enhancements, including improved color rendering, more consistent display across different dynamic ranges, better transform invertibility, and expanded support for custom output devices.

    “ACES has become a foundational part of modern motion picture workflows, shaped through cross-industry collaboration across hundreds of filmmakers, technologists, and color scientists,” said Annie Chang, VP of Creative Technologies at NBCUniversal, who serves as an Academy Governor, the Academy’s Science and Technology Council Chair, and an ACES Project Co-chair. “Joining the Academy Software Foundation will ensure that ACES continues to evolve in an open and collaborative environment, benefiting filmmakers and content creators around the world.”

    As an Academy Software Foundation project, ACES will leverage the Foundation’s open governance model, legal framework, and community infrastructure, increasing the quality and quantity of open source contributions to ACES. This move will benefit both creative users and technical implementers, driving collaboration and integration between ACES and other key open source projects such as OpenColorIO, OpenEXR, and MaterialX.

    “Open source is the invisible backbone of modern film production, for both animation and live action, including nearly every aspect of visual effects. Recognizing this, the Academy spearheaded the creation of the Academy Software Foundation to empower filmmakers with collaborative, free, and open tools. Entrusting ACES to the Foundation is a fulfillment of that vision, ensuring this critical standard for color will continue to evolve and thrive with the direct support of the community it serves,” said Rob Bredow, SVP of Creative Innovation at Lucasfilm, who serves as an Academy Governor, the Academy’s Science and Technology Council Vice Chair, and the Academy Software Foundation Governing Board Chair.

    “The Academy Software Foundation was created to ensure that we have a healthy, vibrant open source community that can maintain and grow the projects that the motion picture industry relies on,” said David Morin, Executive Director of the Academy Software Foundation. “Over the past seven years, we have seen a dramatic increase in developer participation, cross-industry collaboration, and community adoption of Academy Software Foundation projects. ACES is a critical project for our industry, and we are honored to provide a home where it will continue to thrive and grow.”

    As an Academy Software Foundation project, ACES development will be guided by a Technical Steering Committee composed of long-standing members of the ACES leadership and development community, ensuring continuity of vision while welcoming expanded participation. The Academy of Motion Picture Arts and Sciences will continue to participate actively in the development of ACES at the Academy Software Foundation.

    Additional details about ACES and the transition to the Academy Software Foundation will be shared during Open Source Days on August 10 and 11 at the Marriott Pinnacle in Vancouver and virtually. Hosted by the Academy Software Foundation, Open Source Days is the leading event dedicated to furthering open source software development for the visual effects, animation, and digital content creation industries. Featured ACES sessions include:
     

    View the full Open Source Days schedule and register for free here.

    About the Academy of Motion Picture Arts and Sciences 
    The Academy of Motion Picture Arts and Sciences is home to a global membership of more than 11,000 of the most accomplished film industry artists and leaders. The Academy recognizes and celebrates all aspects of the arts and sciences of moviemaking through renowned awards for cinematic achievement, including the Oscars®. With the largest film-related collection in the world, the Academy is a leader in the fields of conservation, preservation and exhibition of film-related objects and materials. Through its Academy Museum of Motion Pictures, the Academy presents powerful exhibitions, screenings and programs about cinema’s past, present, and future. The Academy also inspires young artists and creates opportunities for underrepresented communities to engage with the film world. Across all initiatives, the Academy connects global audiences – its members, the film industry, and film fans – through their shared passion for making and watching films.

    www.oscars.org
    www.facebook.com/TheAcademy
    www.youtube.com/Oscars
    www.instagram.com/TheAcademy
    www.threads.net/@theacademy
    www.tiktok.com/@Oscars
    www.x.com/TheAcademy

    About Academy Software Foundation
    Developed in partnership by the Academy of Motion Picture Arts and Sciences and the Linux Foundation, the Academy Software Foundation was created to provide a world-class home for open source software developers in the motion picture and broader media industries to share resources and collaborate on technologies for image creation, visual effects, animation and sound. The Academy Software Foundation is home to DPEL, MaterialX, OpenAssetIO, OpenColorIO, OpenCue, OpenEXR, OpenFX, OpenImageIO, Open Shading Language, OpenTimelineIO, OpenVDB, Open Review Initiative, OpenAPV, rawtoaces, and Rez. For more information about the Academy Software Foundation, visit https://www.aswf.io/.


    Continue Reading

  • Tech multinationals are saying ‘goodbye globalism, hello geopolitics’

    Tech multinationals are saying ‘goodbye globalism, hello geopolitics’

    The age of borderless tech is ending.

    For decades, global technology firms operated on the assumption that markets were open, supply chains integrated and politics a background variable.

    In the global economy, politics is no longer a background variable. Picture: Getty Images

    Now, multinationals must navigate a landscape in which compliance with state authority outweighs cost-efficiency and scale.

    What was once a question of strategy is now a matter of survival.

    Nowhere is this shift more apparent than in the technology sector. US export controls, tariffs and investment restrictions – especially those targeting China – have redrawn the boundaries of market access, research and development (R&D), collaboration and supply chain design.

    China, in turn, has tightened procurement standards and retaliated against firms deemed complicit in Washington’s containment agenda.

    The result is a world where geopolitical sensitivities govern commercial viability.

    Drawing of a business man leaping from the US flag to the Chinese flag

    The end of global arbitrage

    The traditional model of multinational expansion – arbitraging labour, regulatory gaps and tax jurisdictions (in other words, finding the cheapest workforce, laxest red tape and most advantageous tax regime) – has unravelled under rising techno-nationalism.

    For decades, tech multinationals thrived on a transnational division of labour: design and intellectual property in Silicon Valley or Eindhoven; high-volume manufacturing in Guangdong or Jiangsu; and increasingly, component production or final assembly in emerging sites like Thailand or Vietnam.

    That model is now under siege.

    US tariffs under Section 301, far-reaching export controls on advanced semiconductors (including AI-optimised chips), and the restrictions embedded in the CHIPS and Science Act have raised transaction costs and introduced new political risks.

    View over two modern low buildings
    Multinationals tech companies often design their products in Silicon Valley, but most of the manufacturing occurs in China. Picture: Getty Images

    But more than that, they have signalled a normative shift. Global value chains are no longer governed solely by economic logic but by strategic imperatives around security and autonomy.

    Researchers are seeing that geopolitical fragmentation is compelling firms to reconfigure supply chains around blocs of political alignment – friend-shoring, redundancy and regional clustering are rapidly replacing ‘just-in-time’ globalism.

    Multinationals like Nvidia, ASML and Applied Materials are now being forced to decouple parts of their supply chains from China – even as they depend on Chinese demand for scale, margins and technological relevance.

    These firms sit at the heart of critical infrastructure for AI, advanced semiconductors and industrial automation.

    Yet US export controls increasingly limit what they can sell to Chinese clients.

    Man in protective clothing holding a silicon chip in tweezers

    At the same time, Beijing has begun issuing informal ‘window guidance’ to state entities to avoid procurement from firms like Intel and AMD – signalling a strategic shift away from foreign suppliers perceived as aligned with Washington’s containment strategy.

    The contradiction is sharp: to lead globally in advanced tech still requires presence in China, but that very presence is now politically contingent.

    Weaponised interdependence

    The United States has not only constrained trade – it has repurposed global networks as tools of coercion.

    As American political economists Professor Henry Farrell and Professor Abraham Newman argue, weaponised interdependence allows states to exert power over firms through their dominance of key chokepoints – finance, software, standards and intellectual property.

    For tech multinationals, this has created new fault lines.

    A group of people waving to a robot in a large exhibition space
    Nvidia cannot export its most advanced GPUs to Chinese customers. Picture: Getty Images

    American giant, Nvidia, cannot export its most advanced graphics processing units (or GPUs) to Chinese customers, even via third countries.

    ASML, a Dutch firm, is prohibited from selling extreme ultraviolet lithography systems – used for semi-conductor manufacturing – to China under US pressure.

    These restrictions aren’t symbolic; they sever firms from the world’s second-largest market, undermining both revenue and the scale needed for frontier R&D.

    Beijing, in response, is enforcing its own restrictions.

    Foreign firms seen as aligned with US controls are being excluded from procurement by state-owned enterprises and government agencies.

    A calendar showing a four-day working week

    The result is a fragmented commercial landscape where multinationals are no longer truly global – they are segmented, disciplined and increasingly defined by the geopolitical posture of their home country.

    Strategic adaptation

    But all is not lost. Tech multinationals still have room to manoeuvre – if they recalibrate.

    A full decoupling is unlikely; what we are witnessing is selective disentanglement and strategic realignment.

    First, firms can focus on China’s vast enterprise and small-to-medium enterprise sector, which remains more commercially driven and less bound by state procurement mandates.

    These segments continue to demand high-end chips, automation systems and digital services – areas where foreign firms still hold a competitive edge.

    Trucks coming and going from an immigration checkpoint on the Chinese border
    Intra-Asia trade has intensified in recent years, deepening economic interdependence between China and ASEAN nations. Picture: Getty Images

    Second, China remains a critical base for export-oriented manufacturing, particularly into Southeast Asia.

    Intra-Asian trade has intensified in recent years, with deepening economic interdependence between China and ASEAN countries.

    The Regional Comprehensive Economic Partnership (RCEP) – the world’s largest free trade agreement – further integrates China into a broader Asia-Pacific production ecosystem.

    For multinationals, this provides a pathway to retain operations in China while strategically reorienting toward third-party markets.

    Third, firms can pivot toward new growth corridors – like Central Asia, the Middle East or Eastern Europe – where China’s Belt and Road Initiative is expanding infrastructure and digital connectivity.

    A US and Australian flag in a small stand on a table

    These regions are increasingly important to second-order demand and can serve as hedges against US-China volatility.

    The key for these big companies is not withdrawal, but segmentation.

    Commercial strategies must now reflect political geography. Product lines, partnerships and R&D pathways must be tailored to the realities of a divided world.

    Navigating fragmentation

    In this new era, the globally dominant, efficiency-maximising multinational may be a relic.

    But a regionally embedded, politically agile and strategically selective tech firm is not only viable – it may define the next chapter of globalisation.

    Innovation no longer happens in a vacuum. It unfolds within the constraints of geopolitical power.

    The challenge for multinationals is not how to restore the old global order – but how to survive, adapt and lead within its fracture.

    Continue Reading

  • X played key role in spreading hate against Muslims in Southport, says Amnesty – Newspaper

    X played key role in spreading hate against Muslims in Southport, says Amnesty – Newspaper

    LONDON: Social media platform X played a “central role” in amplifying false and inflammatory content targeting Muslims and migrants after the deadly Southport attack in Britain last year, according to research released by Amnesty International on Wednesday.

    The report accuses X’s algorithm systems and weakened content moderation policies of facilitating the spread of harmful narratives that contributed to real-world violence and anti-Muslim sentiment in the United Kingdom.

    Three girls were fatally stabbed in Southport on July 29 last year by Axel Rudakubana, a British national born in Wales.

    Despite the suspect’s background, false claims spread rapidly online alleging he was a Muslim asylum seeker. Within hours, anti-Muslim and anti-migrant content surged, leading to attacks on mosques and shelters housing migrants.

    Amnesty’s technical analysis revealed that X’s recommender system prioritises content that provokes outrage and engagement, with little regard for the potential harm. “As long as a post drives engagement, the algorithm appears to have no mechanism to assess the damage it may cause, unless users flag it manually,” the report states.

    One such post by an account known for Islamophobic content, falsely linking the attacker to immigration and Islam, reached over four million views. Posts repeating similar falsehoods gained a staggering 27 million impressions within 24 hours.

    Amnesty linked this surge in hate to major changes at X under Elon Musk, including mass layoffs of moderation staff, the disbanding of safety teams, and the reinstatement of banned accounts such as that of far-right agitator Tommy Robinson.

    “These design and policy choices created fertile ground for hate to thrive,” said Pat de Brun of Amnesty. “They continue to pose a serious human rights risk.”

    Elon Musk has not issued any direct response to the Amnesty International’s analysis. Amnesty confirmed that it had sent its findings in a formal letter to X on July 18, but X had not responded by the time of the report’s release on Wednesday Aug 6.

    Musk has previously made public comments on the platform related to the incident, notably tweeting on Aug 5 last year during the riots following the Southport murders, declaring that “civil war is inevitable” as tensions surged around slavery and immigration themes.

    These statements were widely criticised, including by the British government, which accused him of contributing to escalating violence.

    Published in Dawn, August 7th, 2025

    Continue Reading