Sunstar Engineering Europe GmbH v. Ceracon GmbH, Mannheim Local Division, June 6, 2025 (UPC_CFI_745/2024)
The UPC has recently clarified its strict approach to amending counterclaims for revocation in patent litigation. The Mannheim Local Division ruled that parties cannot introduce new prior art or grounds for revocation after the initial filing of a counterclaim, if the omission was caused by an oversight in a prior art search. This decision underscores the importance of comprehensive preparation at the outset of UPC proceedings.
Background
Sunstar Engineering commenced infringement proceedings against CeraCon, and, in response, CeraCon filed a counterclaim for revocation of the patent (EP4108413), which included prior art references and arguments. Two months later, CeraCon sought to introduce an additional piece of prior art, arguing that they had only recently become aware of the new material, despite a diligent prior art search by a reputable firm. CeraCon contended that allowing the amendment would not prejudice Sunstar, particularly given that the prior art is Sunstar’s own patent application, which was filed by the same representatives representing Sunstar in these proceedings. CeraCon further argued that the requirements of an amendment of case according to Rule 263 Rules of Procedure (RoP), if applicable to counterclaims for revocation, should at least be applied generously, and that neither the UPCA nor the Rules of Procedure explicitly exclude the introduction of new grounds for invalidity in the Reply to the Defense to a counterclaim for revocation. According to Rule 263.2 RoP, the court shall grant leave to amend a case only if (a) the amendment in question could not have been made with reasonable diligence at an earlier stage, and (b) the amendment will not unreasonably hinder the other party in the conduct of its action. Sunstar opposed the request and, in the alternative, requested a two-month deadline to respond to the new prior art.
Decision
The Mannheim Local Division rejected the request to amend the counterclaim. Rule 263 RoP applies equally to counterclaims for revocation as it does to infringement claims, prohibiting the late introduction of new prior art or grounds. The court emphasized that all grounds and supporting documents must be included in the initial counterclaim, as required by Rule 25 RoP. The interests of the counterdefendant in having certainty in preparing its defense and not having to defend itself against a new attack for the first time in the rejoinder outweighed the counterclaimant’s interest in introducing new arguments at a later stage, regardless of the reasons for the initial omission.
Key takeaways
This decision signals a strict procedural approach by the UPC. This contrast with more flexible practices in some national courts, such as Germany, where submission of prior art in later stages of the proceedings is sometimes permitted. Litigants in the UPC should therefore ensure that all relevant grounds and supporting documents are identified and included when a counterclaim for revocation is filed. UPC proceedings require thorough and early preparation.
Electronic cigarette (e-cigarette) use is rapidly increasing worldwide, especially among teenagers and young adults. Vaping, the inhalation of aerosol from e-cigarettes, has become a common practice, no longer limited to niche groups, said Neena Chandrasekaran, MD, a pulmonologist and critical care physician in Florida, in a video on Medscape.com.
Once considered a harmless alternative to smoking, vaping has become a global health concern with serious and, at times, permanent consequences. One of the most dangerous is e-cigarette or vaping product use-associated lung injury (EVALI), a potentially life-threatening condition.
Vaping can cause serious and permanent pulmonary damage, as seen in the case of David, a 17-year-old student from the US. He had planned to join the Navy, but that dream ended after he developed a severe pulmonary illness associated with vaping. He was diagnosed with EVALI caused by inhaling a homemade liquid containing tetrahydrocannabinol (THC) and vitamin E acetate.
David is not alone. In 2020, approximately 2600 individuals in the US were hospitalized with EVALI, and the number has continued to rise. To date, approximately 50 people have died from this condition nationwide.
In Europe, additives in e-liquids are more strictly regulated, and no similar cases of widespread EVALI have been reported. However, doctors should remain aware of the symptoms, as the condition can still occur, particularly among individuals who mix their own vaping liquids.
Toxic Contents
e-Cigarettes function by heating a liquid containing various additives, producing an aerosol that users inhale. Although this may seem harmless, inhaling certain ingredients can cause serious lung damage.
Vitamin E acetate is a common and extensively studied additive that is potentially harmful when inhaled. A study published in The New England Journal of Medicine found vitamin E acetate in the bronchoalveolar lavage fluid of patients with EVALI.
The authors suggested that vitamin E acetate irritates the lung mucous membranes when inhaled, even though it is considered safe when taken orally.
THC, a psychoactive component of cannabis, is also thought to contribute to the development of EVALI. In many cases, high concentrations of THC have been detected in the bronchoalveolar lavage fluid.
This suggests that the risk is linked not only to vaping but also to the chemical composition of the inhaled liquid.
The diagnosis of EVALI remains challenging. This clinicopathologic syndrome mimics other pulmonary conditions and often resembles atypical viral pneumonia.
Common symptoms include shortness of breath, cough, chest pain, and fever. Physical examination often reveals hypoxemia and tachycardia.
When patients present with hypoxemia and ground-glass opacities on chest imaging, clinicians often suspect COVID-19 or other viral respiratory infections.
EVALI should be considered in differential diagnosis, particularly when patients present with typical viral symptoms but no identifiable infectious pathogens and report using e-cigarettes.
Identifying the specific components of inhaled products, such as THC or vitamin E acetate, is essential for accurate diagnosis and appropriate treatment planning.
Before confirming a diagnosis of EVALI, other causes must be carefully excluded, including influenza, Streptococcus pneumoniae, Legionella species, and Mycoplasma pneumoniae infections. However, this diagnostic process can be challenging.
Certain indications of EVALI include leukocytosis with neutrophil predominance and elevated inflammatory markers, such as C-reactive protein, erythrocyte sedimentation rate, and procalcitonin. Chest radiography is suitable for the initial evaluation; however, CT with or without contrast is often required to identify characteristic imaging findings.
Typical CT findings include bilateral ground-glass opacities resembling those seen in pneumonia or diffuse alveolar damage. Differentiation can be difficult because similar imaging patterns are present in various pulmonary diseases. In uncertain cases, bronchoscopy or lung biopsy may be necessary to confirm the diagnosis of vaping-associated lung injury.
Treatment and Prognosis
The initial management of EVALI generally includes empirical antibiotic treatment as a precautionary measure for community-acquired pneumonia. Systemic corticosteroids are commonly administered concurrently and have demonstrated efficacy in reducing the inflammatory response in the lungs and oxidative stress at the cellular level. Most patients show rapid improvement in oxygen saturation and resolution of pulmonary infiltrates after steroid treatment.
In severe cases, such as acute respiratory failure, mechanical ventilation may be required to maintain oxygenation. One case series reported that 56% of hospitalized patients required intensive care, with 27% requiring mechanical ventilation. Approximately 1 in 4 patients developed acute respiratory distress syndrome and required extracorporeal membrane oxygenation in some cases.
Despite the potential for severe illness, the overall prognosis is favorable, provided that the diagnosis is made early and e-cigarette use is discontinued immediately.
EVALI is a serious but treatable pulmonary condition that should be included in the differential diagnosis of acute respiratory symptoms in individuals with a history of e-cigarette use. Early recognition and prompt cessation of treatment are essential for recovery.
This story was translated fromMedscape’s German edition.
Want to play Battlefield 6 before the rest of the world? Razer’s giving fans a rare shot at scoring early access codes, and if you’re quick and smart, you can be one of them. Whether you’re a hardcore FPS player or just curious about EA’s next big thing, this guide lays out exactly how to snag your Razer Battlefield 6 early access code before it’s too late.
Step 1: Join the Razer Discord Server (ASAP)
The first, and most crucial, step is hopping onto the official Razer Discord. That’s where all the action starts. From giveaways to exclusive announcements, this server is the main hub for Battlefield 6 early access drops from Razer.Search “Razer Discord” or visit discord.gg/razer to join instantly.
Step 2: Complete the Quick Verification
Once inside the server, you’ll need to:
Verify your Discord account using the instructions provided in the welcome or verification channel.
Grant access to Gleam (Razer’s contest partner) if prompted.
This process takes under 2 minutes—don’t skip it or your code won’t generate.
Step 3: Head Over to the Gleam Page
After verification, look for the official Gleam.io giveaway link shared by the Razer mods. This page is where you’ll:
Confirm your Discord account is linked
Hit the “Continue” button
Let Gleam validate your participation
If codes are still available, you’ll receive your Battlefield 6 early access code right there.
Step 4: Redeem the Code on EA’s Official Site
Got the code? Perfect. Now go to: ea.com/games/battlefield/battlefield-6/redeemThen:
Log in to your EA account
Paste your early access code in the redemption box
Confirm submission
You’ll then be granted early access to the open beta—live from August 7, 2025.
What If Codes Are Already Gone?
These codes are flying fast. If you missed out:
Stay in the Razer Discord for bonus drops
Watch for Twitch Drops from partnered streamers
Follow @Razer and @Battlefield on X (Twitter) for surprise giveaways
Razer has hinted at wave-based releases, so keep your alerts on as you might still get lucky.Battlefield 6 early access via Razer is all about speed, timing, and community. Join the Discord, verify fast, and keep your eyes on those Gleam links. Don’t wait, because once those codes are gone, they’re really gone.
Agreement on Putin-Trump talks ‘essentially reached,’ Kremlin aide says, but plays down three-way summit with Zelenskyy
Senior Kremlin aide and former Russian ambassador to the US Yuri Ushakov has just said that the two sides “essentially reached” an agreement to hold a meeting between Putin and Trump “in the coming days.”
“We are now beginning concrete preparations together with our American colleagues,” he added in televised comments.
But as my colleague Shaun Walker notes, there is a pretty major difference there compared to Trump’s original intentions of a three-way summit that would also include Zelenskyy.
In his comments, Ushakov has thrown cold wateron the US suggestion that a three-way meeting with Zelenskyy would follow shortly after.
“As for a three-way meeting, which for some reason Washington was talking about yesterday, this was just something mentioned by the American side during the meeting in the Kremlin. But this was not discussed. The Russian side left this option completely without comment,” said Yuri Ushakov, a key aide to Vladimir Putin.
Key events
Zelenskyy holds talks on ‘deep strikes’ on Russia as he warns ‘prolonging war will come at cost’
Meanwhile, Zelenskyy said he just held a meeting on “deep strikes” into the Russian teritory, where he received a report on the latest activities.
He said the discussion covers the latest updates on “the scale of damage inflicted on Russia, the cost-effectiveness of each strike, and the impact on the aggressor’s war machine.”
“Russia’s attempts to prolong the war will come at a cost,” he warned.
Prospect of Putin-Trump talks without Ukraine or allies likely to alarm Kyiv – snap analysis
Shaun Walker
in Kyiv
The prospect of Putin and Trump trying to come to an agreement on Ukraine with no one else in the room is likely to alarm Kyiv and European capitals.
Zelenskyy has repeatedly called for direct discussions with Putin, with either Trump or the Turkish president, Recep Tayyip Erdoğan, as a mediator.
Putin has so far dismissed the possibility, suggesting that lower-level negotiation groups should come to an agreement first. However, little progress has been made at a series of direct talks in Turkey, with Moscow sending a junior delegation and not appearing ready for real talks.
It is not clear where a Trump-Putin summit might take place but the most likely options are Turkey or the Middle East. Ushakov said a location had already been decided but declined to name it.
Europe must be part of talks on ending Ukraine war, Zelenskyy says after speaking with Germany’s Merz
As we were following trade developments, Ukraine’s president Volodymyr Zelenskyy offered his take on the phone call with German chancellor Friedrich Merz.
Germany’s chancellor Friedrich Merz standing alongside Ukraine’s President Volodymyr Zelenskyy. Photograph: Markus Schreiber/AP
He said the two leaders “share the view that the war must be ended as soon as possible with a dignified peace, and the parameters of ending this war will shape the security landscape of Europe for decades to come.”
He insisted that with Ukraine being an integral part of Europe and in the process of EU accession, “Europe must be a participant in the relevant processes” on ending the war.
“Today, security advisors will hold an online meeting to align our joint views – Ukraine and the whole Europe, the United States,” he added.
Separately, Zelenskyy appeared to put more pressure on Russia to agree to a three-way leaders’ meeting, saying:
“Yesterday, various potential formats for leader-level meetings to bring peace were also discussed – two bilateral and one trilateral.
Ukraine is not afraid of meetings and expects the same brave approach from the Russian side.
It is time we ended the war.”
Ireland works on plan to diversify its economy in face of Trump’s tariffs
Lisa O’Carroll
The Irish government is to publish a plan to diversify its economy in the wake of Donald Trump’s punitive tariffs on imports from the EU and almost 70 other trading partners around the world.
Tanaiste Simon Harris speaks to media outside the Government Buildings in Dublin. Photograph: Grainne Ni Aodha/PA
The deputy prime minister Simon Harris said on Friday that he would publish the national strategy later this month.
“We must also look for other opportunities to diversify markets for Irish business. While we want to continue to do business with the US and indeed want to grow business. It is important that we take every opportunity to identify new markets. This month we will publish Ireland’s new Market Diversification Action Plan,” he said.
The Irish government has been criticised in some quarters for not building up contingencies in its export-driven economy that could soften the blow of a sudden shock such as the US presidents decision to impose 15% tariffs on all imports from the EU.
Ireland is also bracing itself for a new assault on pharmaceutical exports next week.
Although the US and the EU agreed that any tariffs would not go beyond 15%, Ireland, whose exports are driven by pharmaceutical sales to the US, remains nervous that other barriers could be erected by Trump to force US multinationals to divert investment to the US.
Trump singled out China and Ireland’s pharma sectors during an interview on CNBC earlier this week.
“In many ways, the EU and the US are interdependent when it comes to pharma. In the very first instance, it’s vital that the US keeps its agreement in terms of a tariff rate of no higher than 15% on the pharma industry,” said Harris on Thursday.
“But actually, in the time ahead, it’s important that we seek to further improve that. US pharma companies need to have a base in the European Union – and Ireland has been a very constructive, very good home for those businesses. They’ve done very well in Ireland,” he added.
German car industry grows impatient with delays on US tariff reduction
Lisa O’Carroll
The German car industry has called on the US to speedily deliver on its promise to reduce the tariff on cars from 27.5% to the 15% ceiling agreed at Donald Trump’s golf course 10 days ago.
A general view of a production line of German car manufacturer Mercedes-Benz at a factory, in Rastatt, Germany. Photograph: Christoph Steitz/Reuters
EU manufacturers have found themselves in the same boat as the UK industry which had to wait before the agreement struck between Trump and prime minister Keir Starmer on a10% rate came into force.
Hildegard Müller, president of the German car industry federation, the VDA, said the EU-US deal had “brought no clarity or improvement” to the industry.
“The sectoral tariffs on cars and automotive parts of 27.5 percent, which have been in effect since April and May, respectively, remain in place and place a significant burden on German automakers and automotive suppliers, as well as on transatlantic trade.
“It is important that the promised agreement is reached now and the relief measures are implemented promptly. The US must now suspend the so-called Section 232 and withdraw the sectoral tariffs for the European and thus also the German automotive industry. The EU Commission and the German Federal Government must vigorously advocate for this,” she said.
Other sectors including the wine and spirits industry have also called on the White House to act fast to reduce the current 15% tariff now applying to alcohol exports.
However this is unlikely to be settled for weeks, if not months, as the EU and the US continue to negotiate carve outs for the sector.
Although the EU was hoping for a zero for zero tariff rate on alcohol sales in both directions, a small tariff that applied to wine and spirits before Trump was elected is still likely to apply after the 15% ceiling is unapplied.
This is because a reduction to zero would require Trump to get approval from the Congress.
Trump tariffs on alcohol which range from 0.5% on Sherry to 1.8% on sparkling wine will apply even if the EU-US agree to eliminate the extra tariff.
Jakub Krupa
The technical point on cars, pharma and semiconductors is particularly important as more and more industries are growing impatient – let’s quickly cross to Lisa O’Carroll on this point to explain.
EU-US work on ‘stabilising text’ on trade, with ball in US court to move, EU spokesperson says
The EU has also given a brief update on the state of play in the EU-US trade talks.
Shipping containers stacked at the Rhine-Neckar commercial port in Mannheim, Germany. Photograph: Ronald Wittek/EPA
Trade spokesperson Olof Gill said the two sides were working on “stabilising the text” of the much-awaited joint statement taking further the general agreement reached in Scotland. He said it would still be non-binding, but help to set the road ahead.
“To all intents and purposes, the ball is in the US court now, and we look forward to them helping us to move the process forward,” he said.
He added that “a vast majority [of the text] is agreed” and “we have made it very clear where we can and can’t go now; we look forward to our American counterparts doing the same.”
Gill also was asked about the EU’s spending commitments that Trump spoke about earlier this week, with the US president portraying them as in his “gift” that he can do whatever he wants with (our blog on Tuesday).
The EU’s spokesperson explained that the EU “transmitted to the US administration … sort of aggregate intentions … by EU companies,” but added that these numbers are not binding the commission and it has no power to enforce it.
Gill was also asked about the progress on cars, pharmaceutical and semiconductors, but said he couldn’t offer a more detailed timeline, with the EU waiting for the US.
Zelenskyy spoke to Germany’s Merz about US mediation efforts after contact with Putin
German chancellor Friedrich Merz is the latest European leader to speak to Ukrainian president Volodymyr Zelenskyy.
The German government spokesperson, Stefan Kornelius, said in a statement the pair spoke by telephone to discuss yesterday’s meeting between US special envoy Steve Witkoff and Russian president Vladimir Putin.
The statement said:
“Both acknowledged the American president’s mediation efforts and agreed that Russia must end its war of aggression, which violates international law.
Both agreed to maintain close contact with European partners and the United States.
The Chancellor assured the Ukrainian president of his continued support.”
Putin-Trump meeting likely to take place next week – Russian media
Russian news agency Ria Novosti has just reported that the meeting between Putin and Trump is “likely to take place next week.”
Separately, asked for updates on Gaza, the European Commission has confirmed that “Israeli authorities continue not to authorise or allow EU access to Gaza” as the bloc “is not considered a humanitarian actor,” and it has to rely on UN reports.
“What we can say is that despite this partial progress, we are not where we would want to be in terms of the amount of trucks being able to make their way to the destination,” a spokesperson said.
But the spokespeople steered away from stronger language used by the commission’s second most senior official, Teresa Ribera, who said in an interview with Politico that the situation in Gaza “looks very much” like genocide.
EU confirms von der Leyen not part of Trump-Zelenskyy call
European Commission president Ursula von der Leyen was not among European leaders involved in yesterday’s call between US president Donald Trump and Ukrainian president Volodymyr Zelenskyy, her spokesperson confirmed.
Commission spokesperson Arianna Podestà said:
“The president was not in the call yesterday.She has been extensively debriefed, was in touch with the leaders like always. She’s in constant contact with them, especially on such an important matter.
Of course, you know our position on peace talks very well. We support a just and lasting peace for Ukraine, and our commitment on that has not changed in any way.
For what concerns these possible trilateral peace talks, I understand that the timing, the format, the logistics, are still to be seen, so it’s very much premature to say exactly what is going to happen if and when there is further information.”
Challenged twice, she declined to name which leaders von der Leyen spoke with.
Foreign affairs spokesperson Anitta Hipper added that “no one wants peace more than Ukraine and the EU,” while noting that at the moment “it is very clear that Russia is not interested in any peace as such, because we have seen it in their actions, not in their words.”
She added the EU welcomes “any pressure when it comes to ensuring that Russia is at the negotiation table.”
Ukraine says it struck Russian oil refinery with drones
Meanwhile, in the last few minutes, the Ukrainian military said its drone units had hit the Afipsky oil refinery in Russia’s Krasnodar region, sparking flames in gas processing equipment.
Russian emergency services reported a fire at the plant caused by falling drone debris.
Speculations mount about possible venue of Putin-Trump summit
There is a lot of speculation about a possible venue for the Putin-Trump meeting, which the Kremlin’s aide Ushakov said had been already agreed, but would only be announced later.
Reuters noted that Putin was due on Thursday to meet the president of the United Arab Emirates, which sources have previously suggested as a possible venue.
Meanwhile, we have an update on the Ukrainian gas interconnector hit by Russian drones yesterday (yesterday’s Europe Live), with its operator saying it remains operational despite the attack.
The gas pumping station in Ukraine’s southern Odesa region is used to import LNG from the US and Azerbaijan, with the attack thought to seek to undermine preparations for winter.
“Deliveries are made in the same manner as before,” an official from the operator told Reuters today.
Kremlin tries to bank summit with Trump but ignore Zelenskyy in classic Putin/Trump dynamic – snap analysis
Shaun Walker
in Kyiv
In recent months, Putin has made it clear he does not want to be in the same room as Volodymyr Zelenskyybut would be keen on a set-piece summit with Trump.
US president Donald Trump is open to meeting with Russian counterpart Vladimir Putin and Ukraine’s Volodymyr Zelenskyy, the White House said. Photograph: Olga Maltseva/AFP/Getty Images
The reports out of Washington yesterday suggested Steve Witkoff had come to a compromise with Putin: first a two-way meeting with Trump, then a three-way adding Zelenskyy.
This morning, the Kremlin is making it clear it is working to a different agreement, banking the big summit with Trump and ignoring the part about Zelenskyy.
It all looks like the classic Putin/Trump dynamic we have got used to in recent months: Trump promises something that sounds like a breakthrough, then the Kremlin throws cold water on it.
Agreement on Putin-Trump talks ‘essentially reached,’ Kremlin aide says, but plays down three-way summit with Zelenskyy
Senior Kremlin aide and former Russian ambassador to the US Yuri Ushakov has just said that the two sides “essentially reached” an agreement to hold a meeting between Putin and Trump “in the coming days.”
“We are now beginning concrete preparations together with our American colleagues,” he added in televised comments.
But as my colleague Shaun Walker notes, there is a pretty major difference there compared to Trump’s original intentions of a three-way summit that would also include Zelenskyy.
In his comments, Ushakov has thrown cold wateron the US suggestion that a three-way meeting with Zelenskyy would follow shortly after.
“As for a three-way meeting, which for some reason Washington was talking about yesterday, this was just something mentioned by the American side during the meeting in the Kremlin. But this was not discussed. The Russian side left this option completely without comment,” said Yuri Ushakov, a key aide to Vladimir Putin.
A Trump-Putin meeting would be the first US-Russia leadership summit since former president Joe Biden met with Putin in Geneva in 2021, AFP noted.
But there is no indication as to where the meeting could take place this time round.
Trump told reporters that there was a “good chance” that it could happen “very soon,” with US media reporting it could be as early as next week, with Trump hoping it could later lead to a three-way meeting with Ukraine’s Zelenskyy, too.
Morning opening: Planning the next steps
Jakub Krupa
With White House officials saying that US president Donald Trump could meet Russian president Vladimir Putin as soon as next week to discuss the war, Ukrainian president Volodymyr Zelenskyy is hitting the phones today to consult with European partners on the how to best plan the next steps.
Ukrainian president Volodymyr Zelenskyy visits Kharkiv, Ukraine. Photograph: APAImages/Shutterstock
We don’t know the details of what Zelenskyy learned from Trump during their phone call last night, joined by some European leaders, but it is clear that there is a momentum to push Russia further, and Kyiv will want to make the most of it.
In a morning update, Zelenskyy said he had already spoken with Nato secretary general Mark Rutte and Finnish president Alexander Stubb, and that he would have further calls with German chancellor Friedrich Merz and the leaders of France and Italy. Separately, there will be some technical talks at the level of national security advisers.
Zelenskyy explained his thinking:
“The priorities are absolutely clear.
First – an end to the killing, and it is Russia that must agree to a ceasefire.
Second – a format for leaders, so that such a meeting can lead to a truly lasting peace. We in Ukraine have repeatedly said that finding real solutions can be truly effective at the level of leaders. It is necessary to determine the timing for such a format and the range of issues to be addressed.
Third – long-term security. This is possible together with the United States and Europe.”
He then added:
“Ukraine has never wanted war and will work toward peace as productively as possible. The main thing is for Russia, which started this war, to take real steps to end its aggression.
The world has leverage over the aggressor and the means to verify whether promises are being kept. I’m grateful to everyone who is firmly committed to bringing this war to a dignified end.”
Elsewhere, we will be looking at the latest on EU-US trade from Brussels, as the “joint statement” fleshing out the details of the agreement is now long overdue.
I will bring you all the key updates here.
It’s Thursday, 7 August 2025, it’s Jakub Krupa here, and this is Europe Live.
A study led by researchers from South China University of Technology published a research paper in the special issue “Latest Advances in Artificial Intelligence Generated Content” of Frontiers of Information Technology & Electronic Engineering 2024, Vol. 25, No. 1. They proposed an innovative music generation algorithm capable of creating a complete musical composition from scratch based on a specified target style.
Rule-based music generation models rely on theoretical knowledge, making it difficult to capture deep structures and limiting the diversity of outputs. Among deep learning-based music generation models, generative adversarial networks (GANs), variational auto-encoders (VAEs), and Transformers each have their advantages but face issues such as high training difficulty, insufficient handling of long sequences, or lack of style control. Although style-based music generation research has introduced style information, it has not considered the model’s structural awareness. This paper combines structural awareness with interpretive ability, conducting research and verifying the effectiveness of the method in emotion and composer style generation.
A music generation model under style control, namely style-conditioned Transformer-GANs (SCTG), is proposed. The importance of data representation, style-conditioned linear Transformer, and style-conditioned patch discriminator in the style music generation model is discussed. Data representation includes the representation of MIDI event sequences with inserted style information and grouped musical information. The style-conditioned linear Transformer addresses the limitations in music style-conditioned generation by embedding style information, which is directly embedded into the hidden space of the model and combined with output features to influence the output of the entire sequence. The conversion of generated music into discrete scores enhances the learning effect of the discriminator and promotes the expression of style information in the generated music.
Experiments were conducted using the emotion-style dataset EMOPIA and the composer-style dataset Pianst8, comparing with two state-of-the-art models. Objective evaluations showed that the proposed model achieved the best results in traditional metrics as well as style distance (SD) and classification accuracy (CA), with outstanding style consistency of generated music and similarity to the original data. In subjective evaluations, participants gave the highest scores to the music generated by this model in terms of humanness, richness, and overall quality, indicating its potential for practical use.
Based on CP-Transformer, style conditions are innovatively embedded and a style-conditioned patch discriminator is implemented. Comparisons between the style-conditioned generator and the style-conditioned patch discriminator showed that the music style information in the model helps the generator discriminate music styles and enables it to generate music of specific styles. Additionally, the model performs poorly when either loss is removed; therefore, both Loss₍Cls₎ and Loss₍Gan₎ are important for the performance of the style-conditioned patch discriminator
The paper “Style-conditioned music generation with Transformer-GANs” authored by Weining WANG, Jiahui LI, Yifan LI and Xiaofen XING. Full text of the open access paper: https://doi.org/10.1631/FITEE.2300359.
Since the early 2000s, the Indo-American relationship has largely been characterised by increasing strategic convergence, particularly in the domains of defence cooperation, trade, and shared concerns about the rise of China. However, during the presidency of Donald J. Trump (2017–2021), this relationship saw several unexpected dips, moments of diplomatic chill, and public expressions of dissatisfaction—especially from the American side. Contrary to the earlier fanfare about the natural alliance between the world’s largest democracies, the Trump administration’s posture towards India was often marked by cold pragmatism and visible discontent. This departure from the optimistic tones of the Obama era merits detailed examination.
President Trump, known for his transactional foreign policy, publicly voiced his frustration with India on multiple occasions. One of the earliest signs of this came on 2 January 2018, when Trump tweeted his tough stance on Pakistan, stating that the United States had “foolishly given Pakistan more than 33 billion dollars in aid over the last 15 years” and received “nothing but lies and deceit.” While this tweet was directed at Islamabad, it implicitly signalled a shift in Washington’s South Asia policy—one that placed pressure on regional allies, including India, to demonstrate their worth in tangible, deliverable terms.
Trump’s dissatisfaction with India became more explicit during trade negotiations. On 5 June 2019, the U.S. formally terminated India’s designation as a beneficiary developing country under the Generalized System of Preferences (GSP), affecting $5.6 billion in Indian exports. The U.S. Trade Representative’s office stated India had failed to provide “equitable and reasonable access to its markets.”
Despite Prime Minister Narendra Modi’s public bonhomie with Trump—especially at the “Howdy Modi” event in Houston on 22 September 2019, where Trump and Modi shared a stage before a crowd of over 50,000—the unresolved issues beneath the surface remained. Trump’s speech praised India’s democracy and economic rise, but in follow-up interviews and policy actions, trade friction continued without resolution.
On the defence front, while India signed key agreements such as the Communications Compatibility and Security Agreement (COMCASA) on 6 September 2018 and the Basic Exchange and Cooperation Agreement (BECA) on 27 October 2020, it irked Washington by proceeding with the purchase of the Russian S-400 missile system, valued at over $5 billion. Despite repeated warnings from U.S. officials, including then-Secretary of State Mike Pompeo during his June 2019 visit to New Delhi, India showed no signs of backing down. Pompeo warned that India risked sanctions under the Countering America’s Adversaries Through Sanctions Act (CAATSA) if it proceeded with the deal.
Further unease emerged over India’s reluctance to align with American strategic goals in Asia directly. Washington expected India to play a stronger role in the Indo-Pacific alliance. The Trump administration’s 2017 National Security Strategy named India as a key partner, yet U.S. strategists grew frustrated with India’s cautious approach. Despite participating in Quad meetings (Quadrilateral Security Dialogue) and the Malabar naval exercises, India hesitated to escalate tensions with China beyond controlled diplomatic means—especially during the Doklam standoff in 2017 and the Galwan Valley clash in June 2020.
The friendship was real, but conditional. Trump wanted India to “buy more, do more, align more.” But from the American perspective, India did not seem to be meeting American expectations
An episode that particularly strained trust was President Trump’s claim on 22 July 2019, during a joint press conference with Pakistani Prime Minister Imran Khan at the White House, that Prime Minister Modi had asked him to mediate on Kashmir. Trump said, “I was with Prime Minister Modi two weeks ago, and he actually said, ‘Would you like to be a mediator or arbitrator?’”. The Indian Ministry of External Affairs immediately issued a denial, reiterating that “no such request was made,” and that Kashmir was strictly a bilateral issue.
Trump’s overtures towards Pakistan further complicated the Indo-U.S. relationship. After starting his presidency with a sharp rebuke of Islamabad, the tone shifted significantly by mid-2019, particularly as Pakistan facilitated U.S.-Taliban peace talks in Afghanistan. During Khan’s visit to Washington in July 2019, Trump publicly thanked Pakistan for its “tremendous help” and emphasised a “very good relationship” going forward. This contrasted with the expectation in New Delhi that Washington would align more firmly with India post-Uri and Pulwama episodes.
India’s continued engagement with Russia remained a consistent source of tension—even beyond Trump’s presidency. Following Russia’s invasion of Ukraine in February 2022, the Biden administration and its NATO allies swiftly imposed severe sanctions on Moscow and expected global partners—including India—to join the Western consensus. However, New Delhi maintained a balanced, non-aligned stance. India abstained from several UN resolutions condemning Russia and continued to engage with Moscow diplomatically and economically.
A key point of contention was India’s increased import of Russian crude oil at discounted rates. While the West moved to isolate Russia economically, India ramped up its purchases, citing national energy security and consumer price stability. By late 2022, Russia had become India’s largest oil supplier, surpassing Iraq and Saudi Arabia. This drew criticism from American and European officials, but India defended its position firmly. At a press briefing in Washington in April 2022, Indian External Affairs Minister Dr. S. Jaishankar, when questioned about oil purchases, replied, “If you’re looking at energy purchases from Russia, I would suggest your attention be focused on Europe… We do buy some energy, which is necessary for our energy security.”
Herein lies the deeper question: is the diplomatic chill merely about oil, or does it reflect Washington’s growing unease with India’s role in BRICS, its economic alignment with the Global South, and its potential to challenge the global supremacy of the U.S. dollar? India, along with China, Brazil, Russia, and South Africa, has been promoting alternative payment mechanisms in BRICS, including cross-border trade in national currencies and potential expansion of a non-dollar reserve structure. For the United States, which relies on the dollar’s role as the global reserve currency to maintain its economic leverage and sanction regime, this trend is strategically alarming. While India is not overtly antagonistic towards the West, its pursuit of financial multipolarity—symbolised by energy payments to Russia in rupees and participation in non-dollar settlements—directly challenges the architecture of U.S.-led economic dominance. From Washington’s view, such developments may explain not only its pressure on New Delhi but also its lukewarm attitude, even during periods of public cordiality.
This episode underscores a long-standing Indian doctrine: multi-alignment rather than alliance dependency. It also reveals the enduring misalignment in expectations between Washington and New Delhi. While the U.S. wants India to stand firmly in the Western camp—against both China and Russia—India views its interests through a prism of regional balance, strategic autonomy, and economic necessity. American impatience, whether under Trump or Biden, could not alter this fundamental reality.
In retrospect, the Trump-Modi era presented a paradox: public displays of camaraderie concealed policy-level disconnects. The friendship was real, but conditional. Trump wanted India to “buy more, do more, align more.” But from the American perspective, India did not seem to be meeting American expectations.
Thus, the chill in Indo-American relations during Trump’s presidency—and even beyond—was not the result of any single rupture, but of unmet expectations, clashing diplomatic styles, and divergent national interests. If anything, it served to remind both nations that a strategic partnership requires more than smiles and slogans—it requires trust, respect for each other’s red lines, and above all, realistic expectations.
Researchers at Mount Sinai have mapped how the 5-HT1A serotonin receptor controls brain signalling – finding a hidden lipid ‘co-pilot’ that could lead to the development of more targeted antidepressants.
In a new discovery, researchers at the Icahn School of Medicine at Mount Sinai have developed new insights into how a critical brain receptor works at the molecular level. This could eventually lead to the development of more targeted antidepressant medications.
The study, published in Science Advances, focuses on the 5-HT1A serotonin receptor – a major component in regulating mood and a common target for traditional antidepressants. Despite its clinical importance, this receptor has remained poorly understood, with many of its molecular and pharmacological properties hugely understudied – until now.
A molecular ‘control panel’ for brain function
“This receptor is like a control panel that helps manage how brain cells respond to serotonin, a key chemical involved in mood, emotion and cognition,” says senior author Dr Daniel Wacker, Assistant Professor of Pharmacological Sciences and Neuroscience, at the Icahn School of Medicine at Mount Sinai. “Our findings shed light on how that control panel operates – what switches it flips, how it fine-tunes signals and where its limits lie. This deeper understanding could help us design better therapies for mental health conditions like depression, anxiety and schizophrenia.”
Using new lab techniques, the research team found that the 5-HT1A receptor is inherently wired to favour certain cellular signalling pathways over others – regardless of the drug used to target it. However, drugs can still influence the strength with which those pathways are activated.
Cryo-EM sheds light on key interactions
To explore these mechanisms in more detail, the researchers combined experiments in lab-grown cells with high-resolution cryo-electron microscopy (cryo-EM) – an imaging technology that reveals molecular structures at near-atomic resolution. Their work focused on how various drugs activate the 5-HT1A receptor and how the receptor interacts with internal signalling proteins known as G proteins.
As scientists better understand which pathways are activated, they can more precisely design drugs that treat specific symptoms or conditions without unwanted side effects.
Different signalling pathways controlled by the 5-HT1A receptor are linked to different aspects of mood, perception and pain. As scientists better understand which pathways are activated, they can more precisely design drugs that treat specific symptoms or conditions without unwanted side effects.
“Our work provides a molecular map of how different drugs ‘push buttons’ on this receptor – activating or silencing specific pathways that influence brain function,” says study first author Dr Audrey L Warren, a former student in Dr Wacker’s lab who is now a postdoctoral researcher at Columbia University. “By understanding exactly how these drugs interact with the receptor, we can start to predict which approaches might lead to more effective or targeted treatments and which ones are unlikely to work. It’s a step toward designing next-generation therapies with greater precision and fewer side effects.”
A hidden ‘co-pilot’ molecule
In a surprising finding, the researchers discovered that a phospholipid – a type of fat molecule found in cell membranes – plays a major role in steering the receptor’s activity, almost like a hidden co-pilot. This is the first time a role like this has been observed among the more than 700 known receptors of this type in the human body.
While current antidepressants often take weeks to work, scientists hope this new understanding of 5-HT1A signalling could help explain those delays and lead to faster-acting alternatives.
“This receptor may help explain why standard antidepressants take long to work,” says Dr Wacker. “By understanding how it functions at a molecular level, we have a clearer path to designing faster, more effective treatments, not just for depression, but also for conditions like psychosis and chronic pain. It’s a key piece of the puzzle.”
Looking ahead: from the lab to clinic
Next, the researchers plan to dig deeper into the role of the phospholipid ‘co-factor’ and to test how their lab-based findings hold up in more complex experiments. They are also working on turning these discoveries into real-world compounds that could become future psychiatric medications, building on their earlier success with drug candidates derived from psychedelics.
This breakthrough not only broadens scientific understanding of brain signalling but could also enable the design of mental health treatments that are faster, more precise and have fewer side effects.
‘Rural crime has a serious impact’published at 08:19 British Summer Time
08:19 BST
Lauren Woodhead Data journalist
We’ve been hearing about what makes farming such a special job, but it’s not without its challenges – including the threat of being targeted by criminals.
It is an issue that farming-focused insurer NFU Mutual tracks closely.
According to its data, rural crime cost £44.1m in 2024 – down about 17% from the year before.
It saw drops in the theft of GPS units, quad bikes and all-terrain vehicles, but tractor theft and trailer theft rose by 17% and 15% respectively.
NFU Mutual’s data also painted a picture across the UK, with Wales being the only place to see the cost of rural crime rising.
Rachel Hallos, NFU vice-president, said such crimes “have a serious impact on farming families, from the financial cost of stolen equipment to the emotional distress caused by livestock attacks”.
One of those passes – a Triffus piked (triple front pike half out) to quadruple back tuck – set the world difficulty record earlier this year. It had been years in the making.
“It’s a pass that I’ve been training since 2021,” he said. “The hardest part about that pass is like the mental side of it, just telling yourself to go for four flips in one jump is crazy.”
He attempted it at U.S. nationals without landing one in training.
“You might call me crazy, but I hadn’t landed it,” he said with a laugh. “I ended up over-rotating and almost missing my feet… I wanted some redemption on that, and so Portugal [World Cup] was about a week and a half later. I think I was lucky enough to make it around that time.”
While Padilla says double mini has come most naturally to him, the 24-year-old also trains and competes in trampoline and tumbling.
“I definitely have to work more for trampoline. I feel like I’m a lot more built for double mini. It just comes a lot more natural,” he said.
It’s a difficult balancing act, Padilla explains.
“I train about six days a week, and for five of the days I’ll train trampoline, and one of the days I’ll double mini,” he said. “We’re doing Monday through Friday, and then Tuesdays and Thursdays we’re doing two a day… so it’s twice a week now. So, a little bit more.”
It’s somewhat ironic, then, that his biggest successes to date have come in double mini, a discipline he didn’t initially prioritise.
“Ever since I was young, I’ve trained trampoline as like my main event,” he said. “At that point it kind of like flipped a switch in my brain. I was like, oh, like, double mini is like something I’m good at, I should like work on it more and more.”
He’s excelled at both, qualifying to be the U.S. alternate for trampoline to Paris 2024. It’s an experience that, like his disappointment three years ago at the World Games, has renewed his fire for the sport.
“Just being like right there, but knowing that it’s possible…,” says Padilla, “yeah, came back, trained really hard, and I’m really excited for the next coming years.”