Author: admin

  • Creating a Lidar-based Elevation Map of the Moon

    Creating a Lidar-based Elevation Map of the Moon

    ESA’s Moonraker lunar mapping mission will use a custom-designed lidar mapping payload by NUVIEW GmbH for landing site selections and broader scientific purposes.

    Micro- and small-satellite builder SFL Missions recently announced it was chosen to form part of a team led by geospatial technology provider NUVIEW GmbH to conduct a study for the Moonraker lunar mapping mission, a three-year wide-area mapping project of the lunar polar regions to aid mission planners in landing site selections.

    SFL Missions was chosen to become a member of the team for this study as their spacecraft have a great track record of on-orbit reliability and provide a best-in-class precision pointing capability, which is critical for the Moonraker mission. Moreover, SFL is developing NUVIEW’s technology demonstration satellite, so both companies were already working together on a similar mission.

    SFL’s contribution to supporting the Moonraker mission concept

    As part of the Pre-Phase A contract led by NUVIEW, SFL Missions is supporting the mission concept by contributing to transit trajectory analysis, orbit design, and satellite platform conceptual design for Moonraker. For Moonraker in particular, SFL is leveraging its largest lunar platform, the DAUNTLESS-L platform.

    The mission analysis examines launch options and trajectories for efficient lunar orbit insertion and assesses how orbital parameters affect spacecraft design and data collection. The system design addresses payload integration, spacecraft configuration, and subsystem sizing, with particular focus on ensuring the propulsion system has sufficient fuel for transit and maintaining orbit against lunar gravity perturbations. Additionally, detailed mission and system requirements are established to inform future design phases.

    Moonraker’s lidar payload

     The Moonraker mission will consist of a single orbiter operating in a low-altitude polar orbit around the Moon. The orbiter will host a lidar payload to capture highly accurate elevation points of the terrain that will be used to generate 3D elevation models for assessing and selecting  future landing sites.

    The payload will be a mapping lidar custom-designed and developed by NUVIEW for the Moonraker mission. It will leverage the heritage of the lidar payload developed for NUVIEW’s technology demonstrator. The wide-area lidar mapper will cover both polar regions, or about 5 M square kms. The enhanced, high-fidelity zoom lidar will be tasked to cover individual landing sites approximate 425 x 425 m squared. Moonraker will fly in a circular polar orbit with a 50 km (mean) altitude.

    Moonraker’s lidar data will also serve a broader scientific purpose, including scanning permanently shadowed regions for water ice and providing valuable insights into the Moon’s geological and interior composition.

    Selecting a lunar landing site

    There are many factors that mission planners consider when selecting a lunar landing site. First and foremost is whether the mission’s payload requires certain locations or environmental conditions to execute its scientific objectives. 

    Next is landing safety, which is the aspect Moonraker’s data will impact. Craters, boulders, and slopes can easily tip a lander. Given the extreme lighting conditions of the lunar poles and the relatively low resolutions of current digital elevation models (DEMs), safe landing sites are not guaranteed for lunar landers. Most landers today either land blindly and hope for the best, or they execute a hover maneuver over their landing site and scan it with a short range hazard detection and avoidance (HDA) lidar.

    If no safe landing site can be found, the lander needs to carry sufficient propellant onboard to divert to a secondary landing site and repeat the process. This carries substantial risk that no safe landing site can be found, which is especially critical for manned landers. Moonraker’s data will enable mission planners to identify hazards down to small boulders and craters (considered the smallest obstacles which could tip a lander) before their missions ever launch.

    Finally, there are other considerations such as length of the lunar day at the landing site latitude, thermal effects of the surrounding environment, and visibility of Earth for direct line-of-sight communications. 

    Continue Reading

  • Kirkland Advises Jahez on Agreement to Acquire Snoonu | News

    Kirkland & Ellis is advising Jahez International Company for Information System Technology (“Jahez”, TASI: 6017) on the signing of a Share Purchase and Subscription Agreement (SPSA) where Jahez will acquire 76.56% of the share capital of Snoonu, Qatar’s fastest growing technology and on-demand delivery company. The transaction values Snoonu at QAR 1.165 billion (USD 320 million), making it Qatar’s first ever start-up to surpass the QAR 1 billion valuation milestone.

    Read the transaction release

    The Kirkland team included corporate lawyers Noor Al-Fawzan, Noura Abdulrahman and Fahad Alarifi.

    Continue Reading

  • Warming climate, volcanos raise risk of ice falls on Chile's glaciers – Reuters

    1. Warming climate, volcanos raise risk of ice falls on Chile’s glaciers  Reuters
    2. Melting glaciers and ice caps could unleash wave of volcanic eruptions, study says  The Guardian
    3. Scientists warn hundreds of dormant volcanoes could soon erupt thanks to climate change  MSN
    4. Glacier retreat could lead to volcanic eruptions worldwide, including in Antarctica: Study  Down To Earth
    5. More great news about climate change: It’s also causing more volcanic eruptions  Fast Company

    Continue Reading

  • 10 songs that were hyperpop before the subgenre was born : World Cafe : NPR

    10 songs that were hyperpop before the subgenre was born : World Cafe : NPR

    SOPHIE

    Courtesy of MSMSMSM

    hide caption

    toggle caption

    Courtesy of MSMSMSM

    Years before it became associated with an algorithm-driven playlist on streaming services, hyperpop was an unruly and nebulous internet subculture driven by independent musicians obsessed with pop music.

    Chief among them was SOPHIE, whose debut project celebrates its 10th anniversary this year. PRODUCT wasn’t necessarily the first hyperpop record let loose into the world, but this maximalist and alien-sounding collection of songs helped catapult hyperpop into the mainstream.

    When the late British producer released PRODUCT in 2015, the subculture’s mycelia had already begun to spread beyond the darker corners of the internet. Producers like SOPHIE, A.G. Cook and 100 gecs’ Dylan Brady and Laura Les would stake hyperpop’s flag into the music industry. Soon after, pop acts like Charli xcx, Carly Rae Jepsen and Clairo would become early investors, turning the subculture into a bonafide mainstream movement.

    Listen to World Cafe’s Proto-Hyperpop Mix

    To commemorate 10 years of SOPHIE’s PRODUCT, we wanted to thread the needle between past and present by considering older tracks that preceded hyperpop but are imbued with the subgenre’s experimental and oddball spirit.

    “Temporary Secretary,” by Paul McCartney

    YouTube

    This is basically McCartney noodling about with a new toy — a sequencer that produces those squelching synthesized arpeggios. Combined with his robotic vocal delivery and nonsensical lyrics, “Temporary Secretary” feels in line with the synthetic sonic textures and “uncanny valley” feel that defined a lot of SOPHIE’s signature sound.

    “Let Your Body Learn,” by Nitzer Ebb

    YouTube

    Much more minimalist than most hyperpop tracks, Nitzer Ebb’s single from 1987’s That Total Age still pulses with a frantic energy. It’s an aggressive fusion of punk, industrial and techno that hyperpop acts would continue to push and distort in subsequent decades.

    “Pluto,” by Björk

    YouTube

    This deep cut from the Icelandic musician’s Homogenic is a chaotic ball of fire, fueled by powerful lines about destruction, transformation and rebirth. It feels spiritually tethered to SOPHIE’s work, which often explores how we perceive ourselves versus how others perceive us — and how we have the power to reshape ourselves into new forms.

    “We Like To Party! (The Vengabus),” by Vengaboys

    YouTube

    Long before hyperpop sprung from the cyber-ether, faceless producers across Western Europe were engineering some of the campiest and most cartoonish facsimiles of pop music ever recorded. If songs were food, “We Like To Party!” is high-fructose corn syrup made from genetically modified kernels.

    “Volcano,” by Swans

    YouTube

    Hyperpop isn’t all sugar. There are moments on PRODUCT that bite too. This track from Swans’ 2001 album, Soundtracks for the Blind, is cut from the same cloth. “Volcano” is a 5-minute odyssey through a violent, metallic and ghostly soundscape that channels hyperpop’s more abrasive edges.

    “What If,” by Aaliyah

    YouTube

    SOPHIE wasn’t just a music producer. She was a sound designer who stretched and distorted musical elements beyond recognition. It’s an approach you can hear on this track from the late pop star’s self-titled album from 2001. Producer Timbaland pits rubbery beats against distorted guitar riffs, creating a weirdly synthetic take on R&B that hyperpop will eventually pull from.

    “Grindin’,” by Clipse

    YouTube

    In a 2020 interview with The Face, SOPHIE credited this early hit from the hip-hop duo of Malice and Pusha T as a formative song for her. The connection is pretty obvious once those jagged, impossibly crisp beats — courtesy of The Neptunes — hit your ears.

    “Tokyo Drift (Fast & Furious),” from The Fast And The Furious: Tokyo Drift OST

    YouTube

    By the mid-aughts, the sheen of the internet was leaving a clear mark on pop music. This NOS-charged track from the third film in the Fast & Furious franchise is a mish-mash of global influences, American commercialism and modern technology. It’s the perfect embodiment of hyperpop’s appreciation for fast cars, cute ringtones and undeniably viral music samples.

    “Bubble Pop Electric,” by Gwen Stefani

    YouTube

    “Bubble Pop Electric” has all the ingredients for a hyperpop masterpiece. You’ve got Stefani’s coquettish vocals, a playful cameo from André 3000 and an innuendo-fueled, B-movie, drive-in theater concept built around a flurry of popping bubble sound effects.

    “XXXO,” by M.I.A.

    YouTube

    Deeply misunderstood upon its release in 2010, M.I.A.’s third studio album was a clarion call, in retrospect. “XXXO” is 3 minutes of glitchy, glossy, noisy pop that is as alluring as it is grating. No one knows if SOPHIE heard this song, but the following year, she’d begin uploading the glitchy, glossy and noisy demos that would eventually become PRODUCT.

    Continue Reading

  • Hopeless Records Acquires Fat Wreck Chords Catalog

    Hopeless Records Acquires Fat Wreck Chords Catalog

    Punk rock record label Hopeless Records has closed on a deal to acquire the catalog of Fat Wreck Chords — the label co-founded by NOFX’s Fat Mike and Erin Kelly-Burkett — the two companies announced on Wednesday.

    The companies didn’t disclose financial details of the purchase. As part of the deal, Hopeless and Fat Wreck Chords said that all the unrecouped balances for Fat Wreck’s roster will be cleared. Also as part of the deal, Hopeless has agreed to a “no-new-signings policy” that the companies said would ensure all focus and resources stay on FAT’s existing roster. Fat Mike (real name Michael John Burkett) and Kelly-Burkett will retain ownership of Fat Wreck Chords’ name, logo and trademark.

    Hopeless Records is particularly known in the punk and metal scenes, having released records for artists including Avenged Sevenfold, All Time Low, Taking Back Sunday, YSum 41 and Destroy Boys among others since Louis Posen founded the label in 1993. Fat Wreck Chords, meanwhile, has been home for artists including NOFX and Rise Against since its launch in 1990.

    In their announcement, Posen, Fat Mike and Kelly-Burkett describe the new partnership as a “full-circle moment” given their nearly 30 years of friendship. Posen, originally a music video director, first met Fat Mike after reaching out to direct a video for the NOFX song “Bob,” and Mike and Kelly-Burkett later gave Posen guidance on running an indie label. “Without Fat Wreck Chords, there would be no Hopeless,” the companies said in their announcement.

    “The opportunity to lead the history, catalog, and roster of Fat Wreck Chords into the future, alongside Mike and Erin, is the honor and privilege of my 30-year career,” Posen said in a statement. “We are incredibly grateful that Mike and Erin have entrusted the Hopeless team to care for their 35 years of passion and hard work. “I don’t know when it will fully sink in, but we are deeply committed to honoring and continuing the remarkable history of Fat Wreck Chords.”

    Fat Mike said that his label had been in touch with several other companies about a potential deal over the past three years, but that after looking around “Erin and I realized that Hopeless was the only choice.”

    “We’ve been friends with Louis for over 30 years and he is someone who always seems to doing things for the greater good,” he said. “I completely trust his ethics and acumen with the legacy of Fat Wreck Chords.”

    Kelly-Burkett called the deal “one of the biggest decisions I’ve ever made,” but also “one of the most exciting.”

    “FAT has been my baby for 35 years,” she said. “To me, it’s more than a label; it’s a community, a home, and a legacy built from the ground up. Louis understands that, and I can’t think of anyone better than Hopeless to carry FAT forward. As a true fan, Louis knows firsthand what FAT is all about, and will build on the foundation Mike and I laid with care and respect. These bands are my family, and I know they’re in good hands with the Hopeless family.”

    Continue Reading

  • China’s Chang’e-6 sheds first light on evolution history of moon’s far side-Xinhua

    BEIJING, July 9 (Xinhua) — A series of research findings by Chinese scientists on the samples collected by the Chang’e-6 mission from the moon’s far side have unveiled the volcanic activity, ancient magnetic field, water content and geochemical characteristics of the moon mantle, shedding the first light on the evolutionary history of its dark side.

    Four studies by the research teams from the Institute of Geology and Geophysics (IGG), the National Astronomical Observatories, both under the Chinese Academy of Sciences (CAS), Nanjing University, and other institutions were published in the latest issue of Nature.

    As the moon’s revolution cycle is the same as its rotation cycle, the same side always faces Earth. The other face, most of which cannot be seen from Earth, is called the far, or dark, side of the moon. This term doesn’t refer to visible darkness, but rather the mystery shrouding the moon’s largely unexplored terrain.

    The moon’s near and far sides exhibit significant differences in morphology, composition, crustal thickness and magmatic activities. However, the mechanisms behind these disparities remain unresolved, representing a key issue in lunar science. Previously, scientific understanding of the far side relied primarily on remote sensing studies, scientists say.

    In 2024, Chang’e-6 made history by bringing 1,935.3 grams of lunar far-side samples back to Earth. These samples were collected from the South Pole-Aitken (SPA) Basin, the largest, deepest and oldest basin on the moon, which provided a rare opportunity to clarify the compositional differences between the near and far sides and to unravel the long-standing mystery of their asymmetry.

    “The SPA Basin is one of the moon’s three major tectonic units, measuring approximately 2,500 kilometers in diameter. The energy from the impact that formed this crater is estimated to be 1 trillion times greater than that of an atomic bomb explosion. Yet, the exact influence of such a massive collision on the moon’s evolution has remained an unsolved mystery,” Wu Fuyuan, an academician of CAS and a leading researcher with the IGG, said at a CAS press conference on Wednesday.

    The four papers published in Nature systematically reveal, for the first time, the effects of this colossal impact, which is the core highlight of these findings, said Wu.

    Over the past year, Chinese scientists have achieved multiple pioneering breakthroughs through the study of the Chang’e-6 samples.

    They found the evidence of volcanic activity on the moon’s far side approximately 4.2 billion and 2.8 billion years ago, indicating such activity had persisted for at least 1.4 billion years.

    For the first time, scientists obtained the ancient magnetic field information from the far side of the moon, revealing a possible rebound in the moon’s magnetic field intensity around 2.8 billion years ago. This discovery indicates the presence of fluctuations in the driven power of the lunar dynamo.

    Scientists have found that the water content in the lunar far-side mantle is significantly lower than that of the near side, indicating a significant difference in water distribution between the two hemispheres.

    “We found that the mantle source of basalt from the SPA basin is extremely depleted in incompatible elements, which are commonly used to reveal the geological processes that rocks have undergone,” said Yang Wei, a researcher with IGG.

    This depletion could mean either the original lunar mantle was very low in the incompatible elements, or the massive impact event melted the rocks and carried these elements away. This discovery underscores the profound influence of large impacts on the evolution of the moon’s deep interior, Yang said.

    “The new discovery marks humanity’s first direct access to key evidence of the deep interior material properties on the far side of the moon. It provides us with unique information to understand how the moon’s early interior became layered, cooled and evolved, representing a crucial step toward unraveling the mystery behind the dramatic differences between the lunar near and far sides,” said Li Chunlai, a researcher at the National Astronomical Observatories of CAS and deputy chief designer of the Chang’e-6 mission.

    Additionally, Chinese scientists have made other discoveries. They unveiled the physical, mineralogical and geochemical characteristics of the Chang’e-6 lunar samples.

    Meanwhile, Chinese scientists precisely determined for the first time that the SPA Basin formed 4.25 billion years ago, providing humanity with a more accurate anchor point for studying the history of large-scale impacts in the early solar system.

    Mahesh Anand, a professor at the Open University in the UK, said, “We have had samples from the moon for over 50 years, samples collected by the Apollo and Luna missions. And we have many lunar meteorites.”

    “But there are lots of new findings that are coming out based on the work that has been done on Chang’e-6 samples that are actually turning many of the well established hypotheses and theories in the field of lunar science upside down, necessitating reexamination of many of those theories,” Anand said.

    He Hongping, vice president of CAS, said that upon receiving the Chang’e-6 lunar samples, CAS has placed high priority on related research efforts, and has yielded a series of high-level research achievements.

    Guan Feng, director of the Lunar Exploration and Space Engineering Center of the China National Space Administration, expressed the hope that the comprehensive development of space science, space technology and space applications will be further promoted, urging more scientists to make use of the extraterrestrial samples and scientific data obtained from China’s lunar and deep space exploration missions to achieve more results and make more discoveries.

    Previously, Chinese scientists analyzed the samples collected by the Chang’e-5 mission from the moon’s near side, and found evidence of young volcanic activity dating back just 2 billion years, extending the moon’s volcanic timeline by 1 billion years. This discovery was hailed by international peers as changing humanity’s understanding of lunar evolution.

    The success of China’s lunar exploration program is a prime example of the deep integration between science and engineering, said Li of the National Astronomical Observatories.

    Continue Reading

  • Pakistan never backs terrorists, Bilawal tells India’s Karan Thapar clearly

    Pakistan never backs terrorists, Bilawal tells India’s Karan Thapar clearly

    PPP Chairman Bilawal Bhutto-Zardari speaks during an interview with AFP at the Pakistani Embassy in Washington, DC. — AFP/File
    • Pakistan fighting largest inland war against terrorism: Bilawal.
    • Says cannot hide anything after going through FATF process.
    • Adds Pakistan offered impartial inquiry but India rejected.

    Former foreign minister and Pakistan Peoples Party (PPP) Chairman Bilawal Bhutto-Zardari rejected India’s claims of patronising terrorist groups to conduct attacks outside of Pakistan.

    In an interview with Indian journalist Karan Thapar, Bilawal said: “Pakistan does not willingly permit […] the groups you mentioned or any group to conduct terrorist attacks outside of Pakistan but also within Pakistan.”

    Highlighting the country’s losses during the war against terrorism, the PPP lawmaker said that the world is well aware that Pakistan faced the brunt of terrorism over the past many decades.

    “Pakistan is fighting and has been fighting the largest inland war against terrorism. We’ve lost 92,000 lives altogether. Just last year, we lost more than 1,200 civilian lives in more than 200 different terrorist attacks.”

    “At the rate at which terrorist attacks are taking place just this year alone, if they continue at this pace, this year will be the bloodiest year in Pakistan’s history.”

    Recalling the assassination of his mother and former premier Benazir Bhutto, Bilawal said: “I too am a victim of terrorism. I feel the pain of the victims of the Pahalgam terrorist attack. I understand the trauma that their families are experiencing in a way more than many others can ever imagine.”

    He also elaborated on Pakistan’s ongoing battle to root out the menace, saying: “Pakistan went through a process where we not only took military action against terrorist groups within Pakistan.”

    He said that in the previous Zardari’s tenure, Pakistan conducted an operation in South Waziristan following Benazir’s assassination, and the next government conducted another operation in North Waziristan.

    ‘Rigorous’ FATF process

    “We implemented a National Action Plan as far as our actions against the groups of concern to India. Most recently, we went through a rigorous FATF [Financial Action Task Force] process.”

    He added that the international community was very well aware and endorsed Pakistan’s actions against said terrorist groups.

    Bilawal added that the FATF is a very rigorous process that has a complete monitoring mechanism, so it’s not like you can hide from it.

    Slamming the Indian allegations, Bilawal said that immediately after the Pahalgam attack, Prime Minister Shehbaz Sharif publicly stated that Islamabad is “willing to be part of any impartial international inquiry into the incident, our hands are clean.”

    “We had that sort of confidence. It was the Indian government that rebuffed that offer. To this day, the Indian government has not shared with Pakistan or the international community.”

    Pakistan and India engaged in a military confrontation in May, triggered by April’s Pahalgam attack in Indian Illegally Occupied Jammu and Kashmir (IIOJK). Pakistan has denied involvement in the attack.

    Bilawal had also led a parliamentary delegation that visited global capitals on a mission to debunk the Indian propaganda in the aftermath of the recent conflict between the two countries.

    The nuclear-armed rivals used missiles, drones, and artillery fire during the four-day fighting —their worst in decades — before agreeing to a ceasefire.

    In response to the Indian aggression, Pakistan’s armed forces launched a large-scale retaliatory military action, named “Operation Bunyan-um-Marsoos”, and targeted several Indian military targets across multiple regions.

    The ceasefire was first announced by US President Donald Trump on social media after Washington held talks with both sides, but India has differed with Trump’s claims that it resulted from his intervention and threats to sever trade talks.

    However, Pakistan has acknowledged Trump’s efforts and formally recommended him for the 2026 Nobel Peace Prize, citing his role in defusing tensions between Pakistan and India last month.


    Continue Reading

  • Turkish Foreign, Defence Ministers conclude successful visit to Islamabad – RADIO PAKISTAN

    1. Turkish Foreign, Defence Ministers conclude successful visit to Islamabad  RADIO PAKISTAN
    2. Pakistan, Turkiye to establish special economic zone for Turkish entrepreneurs in Karachi: Dar  Dawn
    3. Pakistan, Türkiye pledge to elevate ties into strategic partnership during high-level meeting in Islamabad  Ptv.com.pk
    4. Pakistan, Turkiye aim for $5 billion trade volume to deepen bilateral relations  The Express Tribune
    5. Turkish companies to launch joint search for oil, gas off Pakistan | Daily Sabah  Daily Sabah

    Continue Reading

  • Amazon Prime Day Deals Drop the Samsung Galaxy A16 5G to the Lowest We’ve Seen All Year

    Amazon Prime Day Deals Drop the Samsung Galaxy A16 5G to the Lowest We’ve Seen All Year

    While pricing around new technology is increasing, Amazon Prime deals are still here to bring you a few sales on phones — even those that are already at fair prices. Take this Samsung Galaxy A16 for example. The Samsung Galaxy A series are some of our favorite phones for people on a budget, and while it doesn’t have everything the new Samsung Galaxy S25 series offers, it’s still a solid device. Best of all, Amazon Prime sales just dropped the phone to a new record low of $142. That’s a nice $58 saving for a 2025 model that has 5G built-in; and its the lowest price we have seen all year.

    The Samsung Galaxy A-series phones are built to last and are our favorite options for those who want an affordable model that will remain viable for years. Realistically, the new 2025 Galaxy A16 won’t exactly keep up with the latest and greatest models from Apple and Google — or the foldable Samsung devices being announced today at Galaxy Unpacked — but it still boasts some decent specs for the price.

    The Samsung Galaxy A15 won the best ultracheap phone on our Best Samsung Phone of 2025 round-up. Our CNET tech experts called it “an easy choice for someone looking to buy a phone that will last for years.” They added in the review, “Samsung provides [the Galaxy A15] with four years of software updates and five years of security support, which in this price range is unparalleled.”

    So, the Samsung Galaxy A16 is one step up. Mike Sorrentino, senior tech editor, says that the “Galaxy A16 [is] one of the lowest-cost phones to get a software and security update commitment [for] longer than five years, which could be a benefit for someone looking to buy a simple phone that will be updated.”

    The A16 has an Exynos 1330 processor, a 6.7-inch AMOLED display and an impressive 50-megapixel rear camera. It also has 4GB of RAM and 128GB of built-in storage that can be expanded using a microSD card. Other features include a tap-to-pay function, an IP54 weather-resistance rating and 25-watt fast-charging support.

    Best July Prime Day Deals 2025

    CNET’s team of shopping experts have explored thousands of deals on everything from TVs and outdoor furniture to phone accessories and everyday essentials so you can shop the best Prime Day deals in one place.


    See Now

    MOBILE DEALS OF THE WEEK

    Deals are selected by the CNET Group commerce team, and may be unrelated to this article.

    Why this deal matters

    We recommend the Samsung Galaxy A series phones as an excellent budget option, which means they’re already great value at full price. This deal marks the best discounts we’ve seen on this new 2025 model, beating out the last record-low price of $175 (now, it’s $33 cheaper than that). Plus, this offer is for an unlocked model, giving you the flexibility to activate it with whatever carrier you prefer or use it exclusively over Wi-Fi.

    Top deals available today, according to CNET’s shopping experts

    Curated discounts worth shopping while they last.

    Want to check out the competition? We’ve rounded up the best phone deals from around the web, including Apple, Samsung, Motorola and more.


    Continue Reading

  • First images from the Vera C. Rubin…

    First images from the Vera C. Rubin…

    Sarah Al-Ahmed:
    We’re exploring the dazzling new images from the Vera C. Rubin Observatory this week on Planetary Radio. I’m Sarah Al-Ahmed of The Planetary Society, with more of the human adventure across our solar system and beyond. Today, we explore the first public release of images from the Vera Rubin Observatory, and learn more about the powerful telescope behind them. Stephanie Deppe, a planetary scientist and astronomy content strategist at Rubin Observatory, joins us to explain how this revolutionary facility works, what these first images reveal, and how Rubin will transform our understanding of the universe over the next decade. Later in the show, we celebrate the Observatory’s namesake, Vera Rubin.

    Jess Soto, who’s the STEM Strategies Coordinator at Mount Wilson Observatory and founder of Science Women Shirts, shares how Rubin’s scientific brilliance and advocacy for women in science continue to shape and inspire future generations. And, of course, we’ll wrap things up with what’s up with our Chief Scientist, Bruce Betts, with a discussion of the third interstellar object ever discovered, Comet 3I/ATLAS. If you love Planetary Radio and want to stay informed by the latest space discoveries, make sure you hit that subscribe button on your favorite podcasting platform. By subscribing, you’ll never miss an episode filled with new and awe-inspiring ways to know the cosmos and our place within it. On June 23rd, 2025, the Vera C. Rubin Observatory released its first public images, offering a dazzling glimpse of the universe captured at an unprecedented scale.

    In just over 10 hours of test observations, the telescope imaged millions of galaxies and stars, and discovered over 2,100 never-before-seen asteroids. These are the very first images shared with the public, but behind the scenes, Rubin’s team has been hard at work for months, gradually bringing this next generation observatory into focus, fine-tuning the systems, and preparing for its official science mission. Perched high in Chile’s Cerro Pachón, the Rubin Observatory is the product of more than two decades of vision and engineering, jointly funded by the U.S. National Science Foundation and the Department of Energy’s Office of Science. Its state-of-the-art 8.4-meter telescope, and record-breaking digital camera, which is the largest humanity has ever built, will capture a dynamic time-lapse record of the universe, over a 10-year mission called the Legacy Survey of Space and Time. That survey is expected to reveal everything from dark matter and dark energy to asteroids, interstellar objects, and cosmic events that we haven’t even imagined yet.

    The release of these first images was a global event for space fans. More than 300 institutions, schools, and science centers around the world hosted watch parties for the image release. And Rubin isn’t just for scientists. With new tools like their SkyViewer and a dedicated Public Engagement platform, the observatory is bringing astronomical data on an unbelievable scale into classrooms, homes, and citizen science projects, making real exploration of the cosmos accessible to anyone with an internet connection. The observatory is named for Vera Rubin, the legendary astronomer who found the first convincing evidence of dark matter. We’ll learn more about her story and her legacy later in the show.

    But first, to talk about this historic image release and what’s to come, I’m joined by Dr. Stephanie Deppe, astronomy content strategist for Rubin Observatory. Stephanie is a planetary scientist, astronomer, and science communicator, and she’s one of the voices that are helping connect this remarkable observatory with the world. Thanks for joining me, Stephanie.

    Stephanie Deppe:
    Thanks for having me. I’m super excited to talk with you.

    Sarah Al-Ahmed:
    Well, this is a moment that’s decades in the making. Building an observatory of this size takes so much love and so much effort, and so much international collaboration. What was it like for you after all of that to finally get to see these images for the first time?

    Stephanie Deppe:
    Oh, man, it is so hard to put into words. I have seen kind of the end of all of this planning, and the lead-up, and the excitement from everybody who has been involved for decades, just getting so excited about the eminent release of these images and the turning on of the observatory. Yeah, the first time I saw the images, it was a really surreal experience. There are a number of times I’ve seen kind of first images, I guess. The first one was when we turned the Commissioning Camera on for the first time, and this is a smaller engineering test camera.

    And that was the first time that photons had ever come from space, bounced through the telescope’s mirror, and hit a camera detector. And so that was a really special moment that happened back in October of 2024. But the next kind of moment that all of this kind of felt like it was leading up to, and it’s kind of like the moment that everyone who has been working on Rubin for 20 plus years has been waiting for was what we call first photon, and it is the moment when the LSST camera, the big car-sized camera was turned on, pointed at the sky for the first time. That moment was a party. We kind of were narrowing in on the day it was going to be, but up until probably the week before, we didn’t know exactly what day it was going to be, because it just takes time to get everything into place and check all the boxes and whatever.

    And you’re assembling this huge facility, this telescope, this camera, like you’re putting all of these components together for the first time. And so you don’t know how it’s going to work until you plug things in and try to turn them on. And so finally, kind of a few days beforehand, we were like, “Okay, we’re pretty sure it’s going to happen on April 15th.” There was kind of like this buzz around all of the meetings that I was in, because everyone knew that it’s happening tonight, like we are turning this giant camera on, and there will be stars and galaxies visible in this camera for the first time tonight. And so they kind of last minute scrambled to put together a kind of staff-wide zoom room.

    So there were a bunch of people who were on site, but most people who work for Rubin are not in Chile. They’re in the U.S. or they’re elsewhere. Yeah, there were probably 200 people on the zoom room, plus probably another 100 people who were, throughout the various control rooms in person gathered. And we got the announcement like, “Okay, the shutter’s open. We’re taking the image.”
    And then like, “Okay, shutter is closed,” and we were all just like, “Where’s the image?” And then on zoom, everyone in the control room, who was actually physically there, just started cheering, and we were like, “We can’t see anything.”

    Sarah Al-Ahmed:
    “What’s happening?”

    Stephanie Deppe:
    So everyone on zoom was like, “We can’t see anything, but we know they can see something.” And so it was probably another seven seconds. It was the longest seven seconds ever, between that first year we knew that first image was on the screen in the control room, and when the rest of us online were able to see it. And then, of course, that first image was not in focus. It’s not going to be in focus the first time you put everything together and turn it on.

    It’s just not. It was pretty close, though. It was amazingly close, because the observatory … The telescope has laser trackers that help align everything without having to take an image, but it’s not exactly perfect. And so they took this image, and it was out focus, and everyone was all excited, like cheering, and then they were like, “Okay, now we have to work.”
    “We have to get it in focus,” and so they started taking successive images. And this camera is amazing, because it is 3,200 megapixels, which is a lot of pixels, and it reads out those 3,200 megapixels in two seconds. It is incredibly fast. And so they started doing kind of these iterations to bring the telescope into focus and bring the images into focus, and you take a 32nd exposure, wait two seconds, and you’re like, “Okay,” and mix into it.” So it’s really fast to do this sort of iteration, and within three or four minutes, it was in focus, which is amazing.

    Sarah Al-Ahmed:
    Well, this release was full of these just absolutely mind-blowing images. I cannot imagine what it would be like to be on the team after so much time working, and then finally, see these, that they’re … I don’t have words to describe what these are like, so I’m going to post them on the episode page for this episode so people can look at them themselves. But all of that was accomplished in 10 hours of test observations. How does that compare to what we’re going to be seeing when this thing is in full operation?

    Stephanie Deppe:
    Yeah. So I will say that the way that these first look observations, these first images, the way these observations were taken were a little bit different just in the sense that the goal was to create these beautiful images. And so we were very much focused on these two patches of sky, the Messier 49 Virgo Cluster region and the Trifid, Lagoon Nebula region. And so the way that those observations were captured is not exactly the same as how the observatory will operate in normal kind of science operations, but it also kind of was. So we have something that’s called a Feature Based Scheduler, which is a software algorithm that determines where to point the telescope next in the sky.

    And this is to really optimize the shutter time that’s open, the time that we have, the camera actually on sky. The software will map out the most efficient pattern to map out the sky based on where we’ve already covered, where clouds are in the sky, where the moon is. All of these different factors, they’ll take all that in, and be like, “Okay, the next best place to point is here. Go here.” And so that software was what drove these observations, but it was restricted to these specific areas rather than the whole sky.

    So that kind of mechanism for taking the observations was very similar to how Rubin Observatory will operate, but it was just restricted to these two smaller portions of sky. So ultimately, what we got in these 10 hours, for these two patches of sky was particularly for the Messier 49 Virgo Cluster region. It’s comparable to about five years of the full 10-year survey, is the depth that you’re seeing there. So we’re going to get more. It’s going to get even better, but that is kind of what you can expect from year five out of 10 of the whole survey.

    Sarah Al-Ahmed:
    What exactly is this survey going to be trying to accomplish, the Survey of Space and Time?

    Stephanie Deppe:
    It’s going to try to do everything, which is always a very ambitious thing to try to do. But the whole point of Rubin is really to see everything. It’s going to take these all-purpose images of the sky. It’s just going to look for the sake of looking, it’s going to record what it sees, and send that to our supercomputing data centers, and then the scientists will come in and sort through that data, and filter it, and curate the set of data that they need just for their specific area of science. And so the way I’ve heard it described, and I’ve kind of started describing it, is Rubin is not giving data to scientists, they are bringing scientists to the data.

    It’s a very fundamentally different way of doing astronomy. Scientists are not going to be downloading this data to their laptops. I mean, they might, but we’re talking like 20 terabytes of data every single night. You just cannot download that to a laptop. So everything’s going to happen on supercomputers in the cloud.

    So Rubin will get really precise data on galaxies and galaxy clusters, very distant galaxies. This will help us understand more about dark matter and dark energy, how the universe is expanding, how it clumps due to gravitational effects of everything that’s in it, and how those two kind of play together to shape the overall large-scale structure of the universe. Because Rubin is going to see everything, it’s also going to see a whole bunch of stars in our Milky Way. So Rubin is going to create the most comprehensive and precise map of the Milky Way ever generated. We’re going to see more stars than any previous observatory has been able to map in the Milky Way, which will help us understand the evolution, and structure, and history of our own galaxy.

    The part that I’m personally most excited about, I’m a solar system astronomer by training. Rubin is going to create the most kind of comprehensive inventory of the solar system that’s ever been generated. Currently, we know of about 1.5-ish million asteroids in the solar system, and Rubin is expected to discover up to another about four million than what we currently know, and so that’s going to give us a lot of information about what’s in our solar system, how did it get there, how did we get here, and just generally the evolution in history of our solar system. And then finally, the fourth kind of primary science driver of Rubin Observatory is looking out into the universe and seeing what changes, the changing, dynamic, transient sky. So the way that the Legacy Survey of Space and Time operates is we get a new snapshot of the entire Southern Hemisphere sky every few nights, about twice a week.

    And with that, you can essentially play a game of spot the difference every three to four nights. You look at the sky, and the next time you visit, you see what changed, and the next time you visit, you see what changed again. Rubin is going to be doing this over and over and over every night and essentially alerting the entire world about all of the changes it detects every night.

    Sarah Al-Ahmed:
    Just to give people an understanding of the camera on this thing, in last week’s show, we talked a little bit about the physical size of this camera. It’s like the size of a car. It’s huge. But this is the biggest digital camera ever built in the history of humankind. What makes this camera so special?

    Stephanie Deppe:
    There are a few things that make it pretty special. We actually have a couple of Guinness World Records for different parts of the camera. We’re in the Guinness Book of World Records for the largest lens ever made, which is literally human-sized. It’s about, I think five feet tall, which is … I mean, maybe relatively short human, but-

    Sarah Al-Ahmed:
    It’s like knee size.

    Stephanie Deppe:
    Yeah. I know, it’s huge. It’s giant. And the other really special thing about it is its focal plane, or that kind of grid of CCD detectors. There are 189 of them that are used for science, and then there are a few that are used for helping to focus in these other kind of fine-tune adjustments to make the image quality as good as it possibly can be. That focal plane, I believe is also the largest focal plane ever constructed, and so it’s like 60 or 65 centimeters across, which is also huge.

    Sarah Al-Ahmed:
    Yeah.

    Stephanie Deppe:
    Think of your handheld digital camera in the sensor that’s in your handheld digital camera, and then compare that to more than half a meter. It is really difficult to describe how substantial this camera is, how big it is.

    Sarah Al-Ahmed:
    If you could actually view the images that this thing is taking at max resolution on some giant high-definition screens or something, how many of these would it take to actually show a full image?

    Stephanie Deppe:
    If you wanted to display every single pixel using high-definition screens, you would need 400 high-definition screens, which would really go a long way in starting to cover the side of a building.

    Sarah Al-Ahmed:
    I love it when I just get to scroll through these giant images and see all the cool details, and as you said, like 20 terabytes of data every single night. What is the plan for managing this data and access for it so that people can get into it?

    Stephanie Deppe:
    Yeah. So Rubin Observatory is not just a telescope, it is a whole data management system with a community of scientists, who have been working for years and years to get ready for this data that is coming. So Rubin Observatory is the telescope, it’s the summit facility, but it’s also all of the data infrastructure that also had to be put into place to be able to get this data off of the camera, off of the mountain in Chile, and to our supercomputing centers. So the first place it goes is down the high-speed fiber-optic cables under the Pacific Ocean to the SLAC National Accelerator Laboratory in California. And there, we have what’s called the U.S. Data Facility, which is a big supercomputing center, and is also our primary data processing center.

    They process a little more than a quarter of all of the data that comes off of Rubin Observatory. They are the first kind of stop in the data processing pipeline. And SLAC is also where this nightly processing takes place. So every time an image comes off the camera at Rubin, within seven seconds, it arrives at the U.S. Data Facility in California. Then, within the next couple of minutes, it gets processed.

    So we were talking about how you compare these images from previous nights to the current image to find changes in the night sky. That is what happens during those next couple minutes. It scans all of these 3,200 megapixels, and it’s like, “Oh, there’s a change, there’s a change.” And it packages these … Identify changes up and sends them out to the world, as what are called alerts.

    And so these alerts are just literally going to be streaming from Rubin Observatory over the next 10 years, but that is what happens during those first couple minutes at SLAC, is identifying all of those changes and sending them out to the world. Then, it gets stored, and another set of processing that happens over the next 24 to 80 hours, where now that you have identified these changes, now you can start trying to identify what those changes are. So one of the things that will happen is the solar system identification. So which of these changes are actually objects that are moving from place to place on the sky? But they’re the same object.

    They’re just moving between different spots on the sky. And so that processing starts to happen after that initial two minutes. And we also send a copy to the France Data Facility. They are going to keep the copy of the raw data in France, and then there is also a data facility in the United Kingdom, that will … And between those three, those are what are the data facilities that are going to do a lot of the kind of big processing of all the images.

    We’re going to have these annual data releases, and that is going to require a lot more computational power. That’s like when you really crunch the numbers and combine all the data that you took over the last year to squeeze the most amount of science out of it, that takes a lot of computation power. And so between those three data facilities, that’s where that work is going to happen. Data are proprietary for two years to allow Rubin scientists and scientists who have access to Rubin data to be able to do their work, but then after those two years, after that proprietary period, the data becomes public, and anyone can use it.

    Sarah Al-Ahmed:
    We’ve spoken with people on the past, who were developing some of the systems that were going to be helping track objects in our solar system, and even in just the first 10 hours, this thing found over 2,100 asteroids, which is huge when it comes to planetary defense. There are a lot of things out there lurking in the dark, and I don’t want to panic people because we’ve found the majority of ones that are big enough to cause a Chicxulub style, destroy all life on earth situation, but there are plenty of things out there that come in and destroy a city, or, for example, something like Tunguska or Chelyabinsk, right? How would you envision this thing changing the game for planetary defense?

    Stephanie Deppe:
    Oh, it’s completely going to change the game. Rubin is going to find probably the majority of those kind of potentially threatening asteroids, the potentially hazardous ones. It’s going to find most of the ones that would do any sort of damage. I really come back to the saying like, “Knowledge is power.” We can’t do anything if we don’t know what’s out there, but if we know what’s out there, then we can start to formulate some sort of plan, if we do find something that does pose a threat.

    And so, I mean, really, the name of the game is just making sure we know everything that’s out there that could maybe pose a threat at some point in the future, because then, we have as much time as possible to be able to do something about it. Rubin is really going to fill in that gap in the Southern Hemisphere sky, and help us know even more what’s out there.

    Sarah Al-Ahmed:
    And then, we combine that with all of the amateur astronomers. I call them amateur astronomers, as if they aren’t completely professional in their ability to hunt for these asteroids, and then things like NEO Surveyor that we’re hoping to launch into space. If we combine all of this together, that’s going to give us the knowledge that we need because it’s just a numbers game. It’s a matter of time before something comes in. And with all of our innovations and things like DART, and hopefully with our observations of the upcoming asteroid Apophis, between all these things together, hopefully we can literally save the world, but you got to start with having the information.

    But something that I’m really interested in, because we’ve only detected two of these things, are interstellar asteroids. We’ve only found ‘Oumuamua and Borisov, and that was really difficult, but with this kind of data, do you envision that we’ll be able to spot a lot more of these objects that are coming in from outside of our solar system?

    Stephanie Deppe:
    Yeah. I mean, if they are passing through our solar system and are there to be found, Rubin is our best chance at finding them. We’ve only found two so far, so it’s really hard to make conclusive predictions with only two objects, but people have tried because that is definitely something that we’re very interested in. Interstellar objects are a really interesting way to be able to study other planetary systems directly. We can study their composition as they pass by, and compare that to what we see in our own solar system, and gain more knowledge about how planetary systems form and what they form from.

    And so these are really interesting and valuable objects, so the only way we have to study other planetary systems directly. However, we are kind of at the whim of whenever they pass by. We can’t really choose when one might pass us by, but if they’re passing through our solar system and exists to be found, Rubin is our best chance to find them. And I think that the current estimates are we’ll find somewhere around 10 interstellar objects over the next 10 years, about one a year, but again, it’s really hard to make really conclusive predictions, because we’ve only found two so far.

    Sarah Al-Ahmed:
    We’ve also spoken recently with Brown and Batygin, the team behind the search for Planet 9, and that’s a really challenging thing, given that this object, if it does exist, is so far away from the sun, so we’re dealing with low-light conditions and an orbit on the scale of thousands, if not tens of thousands of years. Even if we’re seeing the night sky over the course of 10 years, it might not move that much on the sky. Is it possible that this could help us find where it is if it exists?

    Stephanie Deppe:
    Totally. Yeah. I know. You always have to caveat with if it exists, but again, if it exists, I think Rubin is our best chance at finding it. The Planet 9 hypothesis comes from this set of objects.

    There’s multiple aspects to it, but the initial proposal was really inspired by the set of objects that were clustered. Their orbits were clustered in a very peculiar way, that you couldn’t explain unless something was essentially shepherding them into that configuration. But there’s been a bit of a debate over the last nine or so years on whether that is a real effect or whether that is due to the way that we observe the solar system from here on earth. And so Rubin is really, I think, going to break the … I don’t know if I want to call it a tie, but it’s going to, I think, be decisive one way or the other.

    So either it’s going to find more of these objects that support the Planet 9 hypothesis, or it’s going to find objects that refute it so that we no longer need a Planet 9 to explain what we’re seeing, or the third option is we find Planet 9 directly. So those are kind of the three outcomes that I see, but I think regardless of those three outcomes, we will answer the question of whether Planet 9 exists.

    Sarah Al-Ahmed:
    Well, I’m hoping that we can answer some of these big questions, and we need a telescope of this scale in order to help us do this, which is why I’m so excited that there are so many of these larger scale telescopes coming online. But I tell you, I was sitting there, staring at some of these images, just absolutely slack-jawed at their scale and detail. And I know this is an audio conversation, but I want to give people some idea of what these images were like. So let’s start with that image of the Virgo Cluster. What were we seeing in that field, and what really stands out to you scientifically?

    Stephanie Deppe:
    Yeah. So Messier 49 is the largest elliptical galaxy in the Virgo Cluster. So one of Rubin’s first images is centered on the southern region of the Virgo Cluster, which is the nearest galaxy cluster to earth. And what really stood out to me is just how full the images are. You are hard-pressed to find empty black space in that image.

    There are so many galaxies and so many things to see. There are 10 million galaxies in this image. And so anywhere you zoom in and you look, it’s just peppered with distant galaxies and small, faint smudges of galaxies. It’s just full. And that is really the story of Rubin and what it’s going to do.

    It’s just going to fill out what we know about the entire Southern Hemisphere sky. The whole Southern Hemisphere sky is going to look like that after Rubin. So I think for me, I mean, again, I’m really biased toward solar system astronomy. That is my science area of expertise. It’s what I love, but just the sheer …

    I was not prepared for the sheer number of galaxies, like the faint, tiny, little smudges that you see when you zoom in, I was not prepared for how many of those there would be.

    Sarah Al-Ahmed:
    It was like a reflection of that moment of the first time I saw my first Deep Field as a kid, and the first time someone explained that to me, just even as a child, feeling this deep, upwelling of emotion, of this understanding of just like how tiny we are and the scale of the universe, and how special it is that we get to be here and look out at all of that, it just fills me with this absolute awe and this gratitude that we get to be here to see all of this, after all this time of humanity, trying to understand the universe. It is just unbelievable what we’re going to learn.

    Stephanie Deppe:
    Yeah. I mean, as Carl Sagan said, “We are the universe, trying to understand itself,” and I think there is something so beautifully poetic about that. And I’m reminded of that every time I pull up our images, any images from a space telescope, really, but our images to just the sheer number of galaxies. Every one of those galaxies has billions of stars, and so it’s really special to be here at a time when we can do this sort of thing.

    Sarah Al-Ahmed:
    And that other image of the Trifid and the Lagoon Nebula, I mean, it by itself is a stacking of like 678 separate images. How are these stacked and processed together? People do this on a lot of smaller scale telescopes, but this is like a lot of data.

    Stephanie Deppe:
    Yeah. Processing images of that scale really does push whatever system you’re trying to do that on, because these images are so huge. You can actually go download the full resolution version of these images from our website. We’re talking tens of gigabytes, though. So I don’t know if you’ll be able to open it with any program on your computer, but you can download it and have it if you’d like.

    But it was an enormous weeks-long effort to produce just these two images, and one of them, the M49 Virgo Cluster image was actually produced with our scientific processing pipelines that were tuned in such a way to make this really aesthetic, beautiful image of this region of sky. You don’t usually need to put that sort of effort into an image that you’re only using for science, but if you really want it to be really beautiful, there’s a lot of extra fine-tuning that needs to happen in order to accomplish that. And it was just an absolutely heroic effort by dozens of people to make these two images for the world. I am in awe of the people who made these happen.

    Sarah Al-Ahmed:
    We’ll be right back with the rest of my interview with Stephanie Deppe after the short break.

    Bill Nye:
    Greetings, planetary defenders, Bill Nye here. At The Planetary Society, we work to prevent the earth from getting hit with an asteroid or comet. Such an impact would have devastating effects, but we can keep it from happening.

    Bruce Betts:
    The Planetary Society supports near-Earth object research through our Shoemaker NEO grants. These grants provide funding for astronomers around the world to upgrade their observational facilities. Right now, there are astronomers out there finding, tracking, and characterizing potentially dangerous asteroids. Our grant winners really make a difference by providing lots of observations of the asteroid so we can figure out if it’s going to hit earth.

    Bill Nye:
    Asteroids big enough to destroy entire cities still go completely undetected, which is why the work that these astronomers are doing is so critical. Your support could directly prevent us from getting hit with an asteroid. Right now, your gift in supporting our grant program will be matched dollar for dollar, up to $25,000.

    Bruce Betts:
    Go to planetary.org/neo, N-E-O, to make your gift today.

    Bill Nye:
    With your support, working together, we can save the world. Thank you.

    Sarah Al-Ahmed:
    You don’t necessarily have to download the whole thing in order to interact with it, thankfully. One of the tools that came out with this release was a SkyViewer, that can help people actually comb through this. How can, people who just want to look through it, but also people who are trying to share space with people, use these tools to dive into these images?

    Stephanie Deppe:
    From the very start, we knew that Rubin images were going to be giant, and really unwieldy, and difficult to work with for a regular laptop. The whole way that the Rubin Observatory science community, the data processing, everything is designed around the fact that you won’t have to download these giant data sets. And that’s true for the images too. The images are giant and huge, both in terms of number pixels and in just this sheer data volume. So SkyViewer is our tool where you can interact with Rubin images without having to download anything.

    You can download your view if you would like. If there’s a particularly beautiful area of sky and you’re like, “I want this as my new desktop wallpaper or my phone background,” anything like that, we have a really easy built-in way to download your current view, but the point is to make these giant images available at full resolution without you having to download them. This is our way for you to be able to work, or explore, or experience these huge images without totally crashing your computer when you try to open it.

    Sarah Al-Ahmed:
    I’ve also spoken in the past to some of the people on the Chandra team, who decided they were going to sonify some of their images to help them be shared with the world. There are a lot of people who might not be able to see these images or want a new way to interact with them. How do you see these visual and audio tools helping people connect with these Rubin images?

    Stephanie Deppe:
    One of the things we really wanted to do for these first images was also have a way to interact with them, not with site. That was really important to us, and the way we went about designing the experience … So SkyViewer also has a sonification version of it. We call it SkySynth, and this is that Virgo Cluster image, but conveyed via sound. It’s also conveyed via images for those who are sighted, who want to interact with it, but we really wanted to recreate the experience of being faced with this huge image of the Virgo Cluster and just exploring, just almost losing yourself in it.

    There are so many places where you can zoom in, and pan, and find something new, and no two people are going to have the same experience, exploring these images, and we wanted to recreate that for the sonification as well. We really wanted to create an experience where no two listeners would have the same experience, because that is visually also in the visual version of these images, what you’re getting. So the sonification piece of SkyViewer is essentially a random walk, so it kind of sticks you. You start in one area of the image, and there are two layers of sound that happen. The first is we have a central focus area, where the average color and average brightness within that focus area sets the pitch and the volume of kind of an underlying hum almost.

    It’s like a continuous tone, and then the central focus area kind of goes on a random walk around the image. It just kind of drifts around the image, similar to like if you were a sighted person interacting, and you were just kind of free-form exploring. The sonification goes on this random walk. As stars and galaxies enter the central focus area, they play as distinct notes. So galaxies will sound like harps, and stars sound like chimes.

    And so as galaxies and stars enter this focus area, you’ll hear harps and chimes sounding. Those are also like redder notes, correspond to lower pitch for those as well. So you have this really multi-layered soundscape happening. My favorite thing to do is to leave it open in a tab in the background and just let it play as background music, because it’s really relaxing, I find. But yeah, you have these kind of two layers, this underlying ambient tone, and then the individual notes from the stars and galaxies as they come into view.

    Sarah Al-Ahmed:
    Are there going to be opportunities for community or citizen scientists to get involved with this data?

    Stephanie Deppe:
    Absolutely. That is a huge effort that specifically the Rubin Education & Public Outreach team has been preparing for. So one of the things that our team has been working on is setting up all of the infrastructure needed for our scientists to very easily set up citizen science projects. So again, one of the complications with Rubin data is it it’s so huge, that you can’t just download this data, and then upload it to whatever your citizen science project platform of choices. We’ve partnered with the Zooniverse to do citizen science.

    But again, the fundamental issue was Rubin produces so much data, that you can’t download it, and then upload it to, for example, the Zooniverse. So what our team has done is cut out that download step. So our scientists who want to create a citizen science projects just say, “I want this data to go to Zooniverse,” and then it just happens, and you can set up these Zooniverse projects. And so we actually have a couple that are coming out very soon. Actually, by the time the show airs, it might already be out and done, because we expect a lot of attention on this first project, for sure. So sorry if you missed the first one, but there’s going to be lots, lots more citizen science projects, including additional data for this one that maybe you missed.

    Sarah Al-Ahmed:
    I love Zooniverse projects.

    Stephanie Deppe:
    Yeah. Well, it is.

    Sarah Al-Ahmed:
    I’m definitely one of those people that spends my extra time just clicking through Zooniverse projects.

    Stephanie Deppe:
    Yes, we will have a lot of citizen science projects on Zooniverse, I think. There’s going to be a lot of data that you just need human eyes and that kind of volunteer effort to be able to sort through all that data and really get the science that you need. There’s just some things that computers can’t do, and you need humans for it. So citizen science is going to be a huge, huge part of science with Rubin.

    Sarah Al-Ahmed:
    So what comes next for this telescope after the commissioning phase is done? What last steps do we have to do before it goes into full science operations?

    Stephanie Deppe:
    Yeah. So right now, the observatory is in what’s called science verification. And so we are kind of closing out this … It’s a bit of a blurry line between commissioning and science verification, but we are now transitioning from the, “Okay, we’ve turned everything on, and now we’re making sure it works together” to, “Okay. Now, we’re making sure it works well.”
    And so that is the phase, I think, we’re in now, is that verification phase that like, “Okay, here are the data sets we have identified to verify that.” From a science perspective, the observatory is working as well as it should. And then, we’re looking at kind of end of 2025 is when this big ten-year survey is going to start. So it’s coming very, very soon.

    Sarah Al-Ahmed:
    And how are you going to be collaborating with other observatories, because I know already the people at the large Magellan Telescope are ready to kick into high gear?

    Stephanie Deppe:
    Oh, yeah. Yeah. Well, the power of Rubin is really, its ability to see everything in detail and repeatedly. And so Rubin is really a discovery machine. It’s going to make a whole lot of discoveries that people are going to want to follow up, and we will get some of that follow up from Rubin just because of the nature of the survey.

    It’s going to be back at that same place in the sky three nights later. But the real power of Rubin and the way that it’s going to really powerfully work with a lot of other observatories is by providing those initial discoveries, those alerts, those like, “Hey, we’ve never seen this before,” and then providing that information so that other telescopes around the world can go follow that up for more information, or more data, or different kinds of data. Rubin Observatory is an optical imaging observatory, so if you want more data about kind of the different wavelengths of light, like with spectroscopy, that’s going to have to come from a different telescope because Rubin is only imaging. It has an imaging camera, or if you want information in different wavelengths, that’ll be a different telescope too. But in order to study something in detail, you have to first know that it exists, and so that’s what Rubin is going to do, is tell the world, “Hey, here’s what exists. Now, go follow it up.”

    Sarah Al-Ahmed:
    Well, this observatory is named for Vera Rubin, who helped uncover dark matter. And we’re going to be talking more about her life and her legacy in our upcoming segment, but what do you think she would make of this moment in history and this beautiful observatory that is her namesake?

    Stephanie Deppe:
    I like to think that she’d be proud of us the way that we’ve designed the observatory, the way that we have very intentionally made choices to bring in more scientists who maybe have not had access to this type of astronomical data before. We have a lot of folks who are at smaller institutions, who this is going to be game-changing for a lot of them, because we are the ones who are hosting the data. We are taking the data. All you need is an internet connection, a browser, and curiosity, and you can tap in and use this data for your own science. And so the way that we have designed the whole observatory is really about opening access to the incredible science that is going to come out of this. And I like to think that she’d be proud of us for where we’ve gotten.

    Sarah Al-Ahmed:
    And hopefully we can learn more about the secrets of dark matter and dark energy just as much as all the awesome planetary science we’re about to do. My gosh.

    Stephanie Deppe:
    Yeah. I mean, the initial name of Rubin Observatory when it was very, very first proposed to just a sketch on a piece of paper was the Dark Matter Telescope, so it’s very fitting and very full circle that our namesake provided the first convincing evidence for dark matter. It’s all full circle.

    Sarah Al-Ahmed:
    Really? Well, thanks for joining me, Stephanie, and sharing all of this, and seriously, good luck to you and the entire team as you go forward. You’re going to be providing the space community just such a wealth of knowledge, just a beautiful asset that we can use to learn more about our universe for decades to come, and it will take us decades to go through all of this data. So seriously, thank you for everything you guys have all done.

    Stephanie Deppe:
    Yeah. I mean, there’s a whole generation of people who’s really going to grow up with Rubin Observatory. Rubin Observatory is going to be the data set for generations, and I cannot wait to see all of the discoveries that come out of it.

    Sarah Al-Ahmed:
    Thank you so much.

    Stephanie Deppe:
    Thanks.

    Sarah Al-Ahmed:
    While the Vera C. Rubin Observatory represents the future of astronomy, its name honors a scientist whose work fundamentally reshaped our understanding of the universe. Vera Rubin was born in 1928, and passed away in 2016. She found the first convincing evidence of dark matter after it was first suggested by astronomer, Fritz Zwicky, but her impact extended far beyond her research. She believed science was for everyone, and spent her life working to make that a reality. Rubin didn’t just break barriers, she worked to remove them.

    She challenged hiring committees, called out conference organizers who excluded women, and used her influence to elevate others. She insisted on inclusion, not just as a value, but as a prerequisite for good science. Known for her warmth and humility, she mentored countless students and colleagues, often going out of her way to ensure young scientists, especially women, felt seen, supported, and empowered. She also raised four children, all of whom earned PhDs in science and mathematics, which is a powerful reflection of the way that she nurtured both curiosity and resilience. Much of Rubin’s groundbreaking work was done at observatories across the American Southwest, including Kitt Peak, Lowell Observatory, and Palomar, where she became the first woman officially allowed to observe.

    She spent the bulk of her career with the Carnegie Institute for Science, whose support was instrumental to her research. One of Carnegie’s earliest sites was Mount Wilson Observatory, which is visible on the mountain over our headquarters in Southern California. Vera fought to get data access for women at the observatory in a time when we were still excluded from using the telescopes directly. Our next guest, Jess Soto, is the STEM strategies coordinator at Mount Wilson Observatory, a long-time educator at Griffith Observatory, and the founder of Science Women Shirts. She joined me at Planetary Society HQ to reflect on Vera Rubin’s life and the lasting impact of her work. Thanks for joining me in our studio, Jess.

    Jess Soto:
    Thanks for having me.

    Sarah Al-Ahmed:
    I know you’ve been on the show before, but you also run a small company. You want to honor the legacy of women in science, and now, we, for the first time, have a telescope, an observatory named for a woman in science.

    Jess Soto:
    Yes, it’s really exciting. Vera Rubin, right? So what an exciting person to celebrate because her accomplishment was so relevant to astrophysics and just some revolutionary changes and concepts on how we saw galaxies in the universe, and just certain things that were invisible that she brought to light, so to speak.

    Sarah Al-Ahmed:
    What were some of the things that Vera Rubin did that led to this discovery, this idea that dark matter was a thing, because now, that’s something we just kind of accept in astrophysics, is a huge pillar of what we try to research.

    Jess Soto:
    Right. So she was really interested to see how galaxies work, and contrary to the popular belief that in the middle, there must be the most mass, and so everything falling outwards should be rotating less fast. That’s the thing that she pretty much proved to be wrong, and especially with spiral galaxies. It turns out that everything is moving sort of at the same speed, even on the outskirts of galaxies, which proves that there must be mass, and come to find out it’s dark matter.

    Sarah Al-Ahmed:
    It was a time when there were limited opportunities for women to do this kind of research, and she was very discouraged even early on from going into this field. What were some of the things that she had to overcome?

    Jess Soto:
    Her physics teacher, I believe one of her first physics teachers even told her, “Good luck.” “Just as long as you stay away from science,” I believe was something along the lines of how he sent her off. When she was excited and told him that she got accepted to Vassar, that was what he reciprocated, and that was a little discouraging, and I think it kind of geared her away from her love for physics. She wanted to apply to Princeton, but Princeton wasn’t accepting women, so they also pretty hastily, as she put it, rejected. I’m pretty sure they regret that after.

    Sarah Al-Ahmed:
    I hope they do. Really though, the number of things that she had to face during that time, I’ve met some women in science who’ve had some really difficult times, and it made them really thick-skinned and kind of off-puttish, almost confrontational when they’re trying to deal with other people.

    Jess Soto:
    Absolutely.

    Sarah Al-Ahmed:
    But Vera instead, took that energy and tried to do what she could to welcome as many people as she could into science.

    Jess Soto:
    Yeah.

    Sarah Al-Ahmed:
    What did she do for women and underrepresented groups in science during that time?

    Jess Soto:
    So from my understanding, even from folks that I know that had the privilege of working with her, she seemed to be kind of wise beyond her years. She definitely fought for women to have an equal opportunity and to be seen as folks that men can collaborate with. I don’t know if you heard about the bathroom skirt incident in the-

    Sarah Al-Ahmed:
    Yeah.

    Jess Soto:
    Yeah, the skirt. I don’t know if I’m phrasing that right, but over at … Oh my gosh, what observatory was that? Was that at Palomar?

    Sarah Al-Ahmed:
    Oh, I think that’s right, actually.

    Jess Soto:
    Yeah, where there was no restroom for women, so she cut out a skirt, or not an actual skirt, but something like a piece of paper or something, and placed it on top of the little man sign on the bathroom and said, “There. Now you have a women’s bathroom.” It’s one of those things that she was in the thick of, during a time, when women were starting to really be a part of the science. And as you could see, it was decades of a journey for many women in science, from Katherine Johnson to all the way back to the Harvard computers, which were really astronomers. They mapped the entire celestial sky. So it’s really crazy to me to see that even in her time by the ’60s, ’70s, she was still fighting the good fight, so to speak.

    Sarah Al-Ahmed:
    And so many of the women that you just named are women that you’ve tried to honor through your T-shirt line.

    Jess Soto:
    Yeah.

    Sarah Al-Ahmed:
    Why is it so important for you to share the stories of these women, so much so that you are willing to take this, veer off into a side project and try to represent them on shirts that people can wear?

    Jess Soto:
    Yeah, because I think it’s exciting when you go into a store and you see certain legends, so to speak, represented like Einstein, and that’s a common one that you see in most gift shops at museums, or Nikola Tesla, but there are so many that we are recognizing now that just were forgotten, and they contributed in ways that were just as important to science, and as like Tesla and Einstein, Henrietta Leavitt that I mentioned, discovered the star that ultimately helped us have a cosmic yardstick and led to the discovery of the universe outside of our Milky Way galaxy. Katherine Johnson got us to the moon, and back successfully, safely. I mean, these are things that are just overlooked, in my opinion, and all too often forgotten. Cecilia Payne, Annie Jump Cannon, and Vera Rubin is up there with all of them as well, and it’s exciting because these are women that, I think, are just now getting that kind of recognition more than ever, and I’m proud to be a part of that time, so I figured, “Why not help? Why not let anybody who wants to wear a shirt that mentions their name, help them become a common household name like Einstein?”

    Sarah Al-Ahmed:
    But despite all of that progress, we are in a time where opportunities in science are really shrinking due to budget cuts. But also, and I think Vera Rubin is a very concerning example of this, we’re in a time where diversity, equity, and inclusion programs are trying to be removed by the government, and mentions of it on government websites are being removed. And we got reporting from both ProPublica and Space News earlier this year, that they were going through the NASA websites about Vera Rubin, and removing bits of her history about the way that she mentored women and tried to open up opportunities for them at institutions. In that context, what kind of wisdom do you think we can take from Vera’s story? What do you think she would say to us in this moment?

    Jess Soto:
    Oh, that is a really good question. I would think it doesn’t define us. It doesn’t truly define us as a people in science right now. I think that a lot of people do not agree with this situation. It’s something that we have to keep fighting, unfortunately.

    And so I think we just need to kind of stand our ground and just continue to really focus on the science and do what we can in order to stand up for women, because it is just one entity and a very powerful entity. We all love and are grateful for NASA, but I think that we live in a different time, and it really actually misrepresents us as who we are. We are inclusive, we have diversity, and that’s not something that is really going to change just because they’ve removed the past. What do you think she would say?

    Sarah Al-Ahmed:
    She’s given some really good speeches and was very passionate about the idea that every person can make a difference, and that you need to push past these barriers and just keep striving. I mean, what an inspiring woman. I can only think that if she could do it in those times, we can lift each other up now.

    Jess Soto:
    Exactly. I love that. Nothing ever geared her away from being who she genuinely is, and her legacy of being the mother of dark matter is not the only thing that she’s really known for in science today. She’s known for being all inclusive for being fair, for just really being kind to everyone, and that’s something that obviously, although it’s a personal character, has played into her professional career, so I think that’s wonderful.

    Sarah Al-Ahmed:
    And now, we have this beautiful observatory that’s going to be looking at the sky and helping us to unravel the mysteries of the questions, but also give data access to people all around the world who might not have had it otherwise.

    Jess Soto:
    Yeah.

    Sarah Al-Ahmed:
    It’s a perfect namesake.

    Jess Soto:
    It’s amazing. Yeah, it’s really great.

    Sarah Al-Ahmed:
    Well, thanks for joining me and for sharing some of her story, and for doing what you can to share the stories of these women that have uplifted so much of us in science. I don’t think either one of us would be here without them.

    Jess Soto:
    That’s right. Yeah. Thank you for that. Thank you for helping me get the word out there too, and to remember these incredible women.

    Sarah Al-Ahmed:
    Here’s to Vera Rubin and all of the people who open the doors for people like me, Jess, and Stephanie. May we honor their legacy with awesome science forever. Strangely, just after I finished speaking with Stephanie Deppe at Rubin Observatory, and its potential to detect things like interstellar objects, wouldn’t you know it? A new one was discovered. 3I/ATLAS is the third known object to enter our solar system from interstellar space.

    This discovery was reported on July 1st, 2025, by the NASA funded ATLAS survey telescope. That’s the Asteroid Terrestrial-impact Last Alert System, which is also located in Chile. There have been two previously detected interstellar objects you might remember, the mysterious asteroid called 1I/’Oumuamua, and the more comet-like 2I/Borisov. Like Borisov, 3I/ATLAS appears to have a tail, which is fueling excitement among astronomers that are eager to study its composition. Now, let’s check in with Dr. Bruce Betts, our chief scientist for What’s Up? Hey, Bruce.

    Bruce Betts:
    Hey, Sarah.

    Sarah Al-Ahmed:
    Ah. Now, I swear I did not do this on purpose, but as I was talking to our guest this week about the Vera Rubin Telescope, I asked her whether or not it was going to help us find these interstellar objects, and then literally, a few days later, here comes the third interstellar object we’ve ever discovered. Can you tell us a little bit about this object that we found?

    Bruce Betts:
    Yes, 3I/ATLAS, the three for the third interstellar object found. So it’s come off from elsewhere in the galaxy and comes zipping through it. Anyway, it’s big, it’s out there, it’s not going to hit us, and it’s interesting because it comes from elsewhere in the grand universe, elsewhere in the galaxy, and it’s flying through our solar system. And you can tell it’s coming through because it’s got this high-speed hyperbolic orbit speed that you plot it backwards, it leaves the solar system, you plot it forwards, it leaves the solar system, so don’t get attached.

    Sarah Al-Ahmed:
    Some of my favorite comments online are about the direction it’s coming at us from, because it’s coming from Sagittarius, which is kind of where the center of our Milky Way galaxy is from our perspective. So people are making all these stories like, “It’s coming at us from the galactic core.”

    Bruce Betts:
    Just because it’s coming from kind of that direction, we’re 27,000 light years from the galactic core, but maybe. And yes, it is, and it’s awesome.

    Sarah Al-Ahmed:
    If people want to see this object, is it something they can actually see through their telescopes?

    Bruce Betts:
    I think it’ll be a tough object to see if you don’t have a fairly nice, advanced amateur telescope. You’re certainly not going to see it with just your eyes. You’re going to be probably beyond the binoculars. If you’re in an astronomy organization, astronomy club, you probably can do it. If you aren’t, you probably can’t, but I’m not totally sure, and still, it falls now into the realm of predicting the brightness of comets, which is notoriously like predicting the action of, I don’t know, a drunk cat.

    A cat should never be drunk. That was just important safety tip.

    Sarah Al-Ahmed:
    Well, that’s pretty random. What’s our Random Space Fact this week?

    Bruce Betts:
    Random Space Fact …

    Sarah Al-Ahmed:
    That’s the drunken cat.

    Bruce Betts:
    Yeah. So flying discs, flying saucer, I’m going to talk about these today. But what I’m talking about is what’s now called a Frisbee or a flying disc. When it was first put forth and started to be a little bit mass-marketed, it was originally known not as the Frisbee, but as the Pluto Platter. Yes, that Pluto.

    And in fact, it had names of all the planets around the outer edge of the disk and kind of had a sci-fi flying saucer look to it. And then, when the rights were sold to Wham-O, Wham-O, they ended up naming it Frisbee because of pie tins and a company named Frisbee, and you can look all that up. But the point is they still marketed it with the Pluto Platter initially, and then somewhere in there, they removed the names to get better aerodynamics, and then they just switched the name over to Frisbee, but it had an origin in the land of the solar system naming. My dog loves them wherever they came from. All right, everybody, go out there, look in the night sky, and think about flying discs, Frisbees and Pluto Platters, and what you would serve on a Pluto Platter. Thank you, and good night.

    Sarah Al-Ahmed:
    We’ve reached the end of this week’s episode of Planetary Radio, but we’ll be back next week to share our show’s creator, Mat Kaplan’s first Zero-G flight. Thanks to Space for Humanity for making the dream finally come true. If you love the show, you can get Planetary Radio t-shirts at planetary.org/shop, along with lots of other cool spacey merchandise. Help others discover the passion, beauty, and joy of space science and exploration by leaving your review and a rating on platforms like Apple Podcasts and Spotify. Your feedback not only brightens our day, but helps other curious minds find their place in space through Planetary Radio.

    You can also send us your space thoughts, questions, and poetry at our email at [email protected], or if you’re a Planetary Society member, leave a comment in the Planetary Radio space in our member community app. Planetary Radio is produced by The Planetary Society in Pasadena, California, and is made possible by our members from all over the world who believe that space is for everyone. You can join us as we celebrate the advancement of space science and the people that make it happen at planetary.org/join. Mark Hilverda and Rae Paoletta are our associate producers. Casey Dreier hosts our monthly Space Policy Edition, and now announcing Mat Kaplan as the host of our new monthly book club edition of Planetary Radio.

    More on that next week. Andrew Lucas is our audio editor. Josh Doyle composed our theme, which is arranged and performed by Pieter Schlosser. And until next week, ad astra.


    Continue Reading