The original Birkin bag sold for a record €8.58 million ($10 million) at auction, showing demand remains robust for unique luxury collectibles.
The black leather Hermès handbag made some forty years ago for the late singer and actress Jane Birkin was sold in a bidding war that lasted more than 10 minutes at Sotheby’s in Paris Thursday. Valuence Japan, a Tokyo-based re-seller of designer goods, said it was the buyer. Bidding was conducted via telephone, according to the auction house.
A new study led by investigators at the UCLA Health Jonsson Comprehensive Cancer Center may help explain why certain liver tumors return quickly after thermal ablation, a widely used minimally-invasive, image-guided technique that kills cancer cells by applying intense heat through a needle-like probe.
The team found that the sugar-binding protein Galectin-1 (Gal-1) plays a critical role in helping hepatocellular carcinoma, the most common form of primary liver cancer, resist thermal ablation and even thrive after being treated with high heat.
“We found that Gal-1 fuels cancer cells by boosting their ability to produce energy through sugar metabolism, allowing them to resist the effects of thermal stress,” said Dr. Jason Chiang, assistant professor of Radiological Sciences at the David Geffen School of Medicine at UCLA and senior author of the study. “It facilitates production of the additional energy required for liver cancer cells to continue growing, even after being exposed to thermal ablation. This helps the cells not only bounce back quickly after ablation but progress even faster on follow up imaging.”
The discovery, published in Hepatology, points to a promising new strategy that involves targeting Gal-1 to block the cancer’s survival mechanism. This combined approach could enhance the effectiveness of thermal ablation for people with early-stage, non-resectable liver cancer, and reduce the risk for progression after treatment.
While ablation typically destroys cancer cells at the center of the treated area and can be curative, up to 40% of patients eventually experience cancer recurrence, often at the tumor’s edge where the heat is less intense.
We’ve long known that the center of the tumor is destroyed by ablation, but the edges often remain vulnerable. What we didn’t fully understand was how some of these peripheral cancer cells managed to resist the peri-ablational heat, but we now know that Gal-1 seems to play a critical role in helping them survive and continue growing.”
Tu Nguyen, medical student at the David Geffen School of Medicine at UCLA, and first author of the paper
To better understand how Gal-1 works and influences liver cancer treatment, researchers analyzed 58 treatment naïve pre-ablation biopsy samples from patients with early-stage liver cancer and subsequently found to have either responded or had local recurrences to the ablation treatment. Using advanced lab techniques to analyze protein profiles of the pre-ablation biopsy samples, they found Gal-1 to be overproduced in tumors that had rapid recurrence after thermal ablation.
Using patient biopsy samples, genetically modified cell cultures and mouse cancer models, the researchers showed that Gal-1 enhances cancer cells’ ability to use sugar through a process called glycolysis, even in the face of thermal stress. They also found Gal-1 helps feed another major energy-producing system in cells, known as the tricarboxylic acid (TCA) cycle. Together, these metabolic pathways provide a survival advantage for tumor cells with higher Gal-1 levels after exposure to sublethal heat found in ablation zone peripheries, allowing them to quickly regrow after ablation.
While Gal-1 has previously been linked to cancer spread and resistance to therapy in other tumor types, this study is among the first to connect liver cancer recurrence to a specific metabolic mechanism driven by Gal-1, the researchers noted.
To test a potential pharmaceutical solution, the team paired thermal ablation with a drug that blocks Gal-1, called OTX008. This is a small-molecule inhibitor that binds selectively to Gal-1 to disrupt its function within tumor cells. When tested in mice, the combined treatment approach led to a 2-fold reduction in tumor size and a significant decrease in cancer cells’ ability to produce energy, compared to either treatment alone. These effects were closely linked to lower levels of the Gal-1 protein in tumors treated with the combination therapy, suggesting that Gal-1 inhibition could sensitize liver tumors to ablation and reduce recurrence risks.
“By blocking Gal-1, we’re not just making standard-of-care thermal ablation work better in early-stage liver cancer, but we may also be opening doors to better treatment options across all stages of liver cancer,” said Chiang. “Gal-1 is an evolutionarily conserved protein that is utilized in not only cancer metabolism, but also in immunology and cancer signaling pathways. There is thus tremendous potential in disrupting Gal-1 to also improve response rates of current drugs that are normally used to treat advanced stage liver cancers.”
While more studies are needed to confirm the results in human patients, the research shows considerable clinical promise for improving patient outcomes. The discovery not only identifies a key metabolic driver of liver cancer recurrence but also introduces a potential new therapeutic target. By integrating Gal-1 inhibition into existing treatment strategies, clinicians may be able to eliminate residual tumor cells, reduce recurrence rates and potentially extend this benefit to more advanced stages of the disease.
Other authors of this study, all from UCLA, are Yonghwan Shin, Aravinth Ruppa, Abigail Krall, Janet Pham, Po-Chun Chen, Hannah Mirmohammadi, Pedram Keshavaraz, Richard Finn, Vatche Agopian, Samuel French, Heather Christofk, David Lu and Steven Raman.
The work was supported in part by the UCLA Department Exploratory Research Grant, the UCLA Health Jonsson Comprehensive Center Fellowship Grant, and the Radiological Society of North America Research Scholar Grant.
Source:
University of California – Los Angeles Health Sciences
Journal reference:
Nguyen, T., et al. (2025). Galectin-1 modulates glycolysis via a GM1-galactose-dependent pathway to promote hyperthermia resistance in hepatocellular carcinoma. Hepatology. doi.org/10.1097/hep.0000000000001391.
West Africa is a growing market for Honda. In particular, the Republic of Ghana is a prominent market with one of the highest GDPs in West Africa, with a population of approximately 34.12 million, and a land area roughly two-thirds the size of Japan. It is known for its cocoa bean cultivation and mining of precious metals and oil.
Honda Motor Southern Africa (Pty.) Ltd. – Ghana (HSAF-G), established in April 2019 to support Honda distributors (responsible for sales and post-sales services) in the West African region, aims to enhance the penetration and value of the Honda brand in the West African region.
Despite being a small team of three expatriates and four local associates, HSAF-G actively visits distributors in the seven countries in West Africa, working to increase Honda’s customer base and maintain and improve quality.
In recent years, HSAF-G has been particularly focused on improving service quality. In Africa, there are many “roadside mechanics” who perform motorcycle maintenance on roadsides at low cost. Although many motorcyclists rely on these roadside mechanics rather than authorized dealerships., these mechanics often lack proper training, use low-quality replacement parts, and may leave customers with concerns about the quality of their repairs. To address this, HSAF-G is focusing on training skilled mechanics to provide customers with reliable service and enhance the presence of Honda’s official dealerships in the post-sales service sector.
Kenta Aoki, stationed at HSAF-G, leads this initiative. To improve the skills of local mechanics, Aoki launched the “Aoki Juku” motorcycle service training program in West Africa. In this academy, technicians (local mechanics) visit authorized dealers in their respective countries to ensure they are performing tasks correctly according to standard procedures. Skill checks are conducted to verify technical proficiency, and successful completion is rewarded with accreditation.
This issue of Honda Stories video introduces the “Aoki Juku” motorcycle service training program operated in the West African region.
EXCLUSIVE: Director M. Raihan Halim is reuniting with the cast of La Luna, Singapore’s submission for Best International Feature at this year’s Oscars, on family drama Badak, a co-production between Singapore, Malaysia and Indonesia.
La Luna‘s Shaheizy Sam and Wan Hanafi both play fathers struggling to connect with their much beloved children in the new film, which is scheduled for theatrical release in Malaysia on October 2 and in Singapore on October 16. Details of the Indonesian release will be announced soon.
Shaheizy Sam, whose credits also include the Police Evo franchise, plays a deaf single father whose life revolves around his daughter, Mirah. But when she becomes an overnight hip-hop sensation, their once tranquil routine is upended.
The actor underwent a massive physical transformation for the role – gaining 30kg over five months adhering to a strict diet of high sugar, high fat, and junk food. The film started shooting in late 2024 but only wrapped in May 2025 as the production waited six months for him to shed the weight for the second part of the shoot.
Wan Hanafi, who also starred in Cannes Un Certain Regard 2016 title Apprentice, plays a hearing father who has struggled to communicate with his deaf son his whole life. Rounding out the cast are Aida Amron, playing Mirah, and Kahoe Hon (Project: High Council) playing a DJ in the underground hip-hop scene.
“It truly makes me happy to portray two distinct physical forms in one film for the first time,” said Shaheizy Sam. “I believe this will distract viewers from the ‘usual me’, making the character feel new, and it has significantly boosted my confidence, proving my passion for acting is still strong after 30 years.”
Director M. Raihan Halim said: “I don’t think it’s hyperbole to say that there’s only one person who has the discipline and dedication to play Badak. That man is Shaheizy Sam. We both had so much fun working on La Luna that I knew I wanted to continue our collaboration with something far more challenging, and yes, scary.”
The film is financed by Singapore’s Clover Films and Malaysia’s Golden Screen Cinemas and Papahan Films, in association with Sinemart Indonesia, Juita Viden, One Tree Holdings, ACT 2 Pictures and Dropkick.
Clover Films, Papahan Films and Malaysian filmmaker Adrian Teh’s ACT 2 Pictures are the main producers on the film, which received support from the Singapore Film Commission and the Infocomm Media Development Authority.
Clover Films and GSC Movies will co-distribute in Malaysia, with Clover Films and Golden Village Pictures jointly handling Singapore distribution.
(Bloomberg) — US stock futures retreated and the dollar strengthened after President Donald Trump ratcheted up trade tensions yet again by suggesting higher tariff rates on most trading partners.
Contracts for the S&P 500 fell 0.4% and a gauge of the dollar rose 0.2% after Trump said in an interview with NBC News Thursday he plans to impose blanket levies of 15% or 20%. The current blanket tariff rate is 10%. The president plans to make a “major statement” on Russia and he is also mulling the use of sanctions.
The Canadian dollar weakened after Trump said he will impose 35% levy on some goods from the country. Gold rose for a third day as investors sought haven assets. Asian equities advanced 0.5%, led by cyclical stocks. Goldman Sachs Group Inc. strategists raised their forecast for Asia ex-Japan stocks, citing a more favorable macro environment and lower tariff risk.
“The latest news of a higher tariff rate on Canada and potentially others as well has seen risk getting pared back,” said Khoon Goh, head of Asia research at Australia and New Zealand Banking Group Ltd. “We are likely to see more risk aversion across Asia as investors pare back their positions ahead of the weekend, to avoid any whiplash that could occur next week on further tariff news over the next couple of days.”
Tariff tensions have increased recently as Trump pushed ahead with his plans to impose levies on various trading partners in a bid to remake the global trade, which he says wasn’t favorable to the US. Even so, investors have been piling back into stocks – the S&P 500 closed at a record Thursday – in a sign investors are shifting their focus from concerns about lower growth and higher inflation to prepare for the upcoming earnings season.
The levy on Canada is a blow to Prime Minister Mark Carney’s bid to avoid punishing levies on goods sold to the US. The tariff level would take effect from Aug. 1.
The announced rate is an increase from the current 25% levy on Canadian imports not covered by the trade deal negotiated between the US, Canada and Mexico, which do not face additional tariffs. That exclusion would remain unchanged, according to a official, who spoke on condition of anonymity to discuss the matter.
“Markets are likely to be concerned about further escalations given that Canada has retaliated before,” said Fiona Lim, a senior strategist at Malayan Banking Bhd in Singapore. “Given that US dollar has fallen substantially in the first half of the year, we could be seeing some unwinding of short US dollar positions amid intermittent tariff announcements.”
Trump’s moves signal no retreat from his flagship economic policy, with the president noting to NBC the recent rise in US equity markets. The president has spent the week sending missives to trading partners, informing them of new rates that will kick in on Aug. 1 if they cannot negotiate better terms. Letters to members of the European Union are also expected shortly.
Separately, Hong Kong authorities intervened for the fourth time in two weeks to prevent the city’s currency from weakening beyond its official trading band.
In China, after years of mounting concern over deflation and the bruising price wars that have plagued much of China’s economy, President Xi Jinping’s government is showing signs of finally taking action.
Elsewhere, JPMorgan Chase & Co. is considering cutting the weight of bond issuers in its emerging-market index — including China and India — as it seeks to reflect a broader range of developing-nation debt.
Corporate Highlights:
Nissan Motor Co. raised $4.5 billion from a junk-bond sale in US dollar and euros. The embattled automaker is offering a record-high coupon on at least one part of the deal to drum up demand.
Asian airline stocks gain after Delta issued a strong earnings outlook and said vacationers are coming back.
Northern Rare Earth and other Asian shares tied to critical minerals follow US peers higher after MP Materials secured a $400 million equity investment from the US Department of Defense.
Some of the main moves in markets:
Stocks
S&P 500 futures fell 0.4% as of 10:55 a.m. Tokyo time
Japan’s Topix rose 0.8%
Australia’s S&P/ASX 200 fell 0.2%
Hong Kong’s Hang Seng rose 1.1%
The Shanghai Composite rose 0.3%
Euro Stoxx 50 futures fell 0.3%
Currencies
The Bloomberg Dollar Spot Index rose 0.2%
The euro fell 0.2% to $1.1678
The Japanese yen fell 0.3% to 146.73 per dollar
The offshore yuan was little changed at 7.1777 per dollar
Cryptocurrencies
Bitcoin rose 2% to $115,896.42
Ether rose 4.5% to $2,946.35
Bonds
The yield on 10-year Treasuries was little changed at 4.36%
Japan’s 10-year yield was unchanged at 1.490%
Australia’s 10-year yield advanced four basis points to 4.32%
Commodities
West Texas Intermediate crude rose 0.8% to $67.07 a barrel
Spot gold rose 0.2% to $3,329.37 an ounce
This story was produced with the assistance of Bloomberg Automation.
–With assistance from Ruth Carson, Matthew Burgess and Mark Cranfield.
Donald Trump has said the US will impose a 35% tariff on imports from Canada next month and threatened to impose blanket tariffs of 15% or 20% on most other trade partners.
In a letter released on his social media platform, Trump told Mark Carney, the Canadian prime minister, the new rate would go into effect on 1 August and would increase if Canada retaliated.
Carney said on X his government would continue to defend Canadian workers and businesses in their negotiations with the US as they worked toward that deadline.
In March, Trump imposed a 25% tariff on cars and auto parts imported from Canada. In June, he announced a 50% tariff on Canadian steel and aluminum imports. The new rate would apply to all other goods.
Canada and the US are locked in trade negotiations in the hopes of reaching a deal, but the latest threat seemed to put that date in jeopardy.
It was the latest of more than 20 such letters issued by Trump since Monday, as he continues to pursue his trade war threats against dozens of economies.
However the new tariff rates set by Trump this week could all be reduced to zero if the administration loses its appeal later this month of an adverse ruling by the US court of international trade, which found in May that the president had acted beyond his legal authority by using emergency powers to impose tariffs in the absence of an actual emergency.
That hearing at the US court of appeals for the federal circuit in Washington is scheduled for 10am local time on 31 July.
Canada and Mexico are both trying to find ways to satisfy Trump so that the free trade deal uniting the three countries – known as the USMCA – can be put back on track.
The United States-Mexico-Canada Agreement replaced the previous Nafta accord in July 2020, after Trump successfully pushed for a renegotiation during his first term in office. It was due to be reviewed by July next year, but Trump has thrown the process into disarray by launching his trade wars after he took office in January.
Earlier this year, Canadian and Mexican products were slapped with 25% US tariffs, with a lower rate for Canadian energy. Trump targeted both neighbours, saying they did not do enough on illegal immigration and the flow of illicit drugs across borders.
But he eventually announced exemptions for goods entering his country under the USMCA, covering large swaths of products.
Thursday’s letter to Carney comes despite continuing trade negotiations and what many had seen as warming relations between Trump and the Canadian prime minister. Carney came to the White House on 6 May and had a cordial meeting with Trump in the Oval Office.
After Trump called off trade talks last month due to Canada’s newly imposed digital services tax, Carney agreed to rescind the levy, which would have affected US tech firms.
Trump has broadened his trade war in recent days, threatening new tariffs on a number of countries, including allies Japan and South Korea, along with a 50% tariff on copper.
In an interview with NBC News published on Thursday, Trump said other trading partners that had not yet received such letters could face blanket tariffs.
“Not everybody has to get a letter. You know that. We’re just setting our tariffs,” Trump said in the interview.
“We’re just going to say all of the remaining countries are going to pay, whether it’s 20% or 15%. We’ll work that out now,” Trump was quoted as saying by the network.
The blue shark (Prionace glauca) might be more than its name. Scientists investigating the sleek ocean predator’s skin discovered nanostructures that not only produce its signature hue, but also potentially let it change color like a chameleon.
Animals produce their colors in various ways. Some rely on pigmented cells that reflect a color by selectively removing wavelengths from ambient light, while others have microscopic light-scattering structures that build or remove select wavelengths – think peacock feathers.
A rare few can tweak their color-coding features in response to their surroundings, by modifying how wavelengths are absorbed or scattered.
Now it’s been revealed that the blue shark has that color-morphing ability, in a new study led by scientists at the City University of Hong Kong (CUHK).
Related: Squids’ Amazing Color Shifting Could Be Key to Hyper-Efficient Solar Tech
As their name suggests, blue sharks generally have dark blue coloration on their backs and lighter bellies. Their skin is lined with tooth-like scales called dermal denticles, and inside these are pulp cavities that play a key role in producing color.
The researchers examined these denticles using optical and electron microscopy, spectroscopy, and other imaging technology. They found that the pulp cavities contain guanine crystals, which reflect blue light, and tiny little sacs of the pigment melanin that absorb other colors.
“These components are packed into separate cells, reminiscent of bags filled with mirrors and bags with black absorbers, but kept in close association so they work together,” says Viktoriia Kamska, molecular biologist at CUHK.
Close up of blue shark skin, showing the dermal denticles responsible for its coloring. (Dr Viktoriia Kamska)
On closer inspection, the team found that these structures don’t just put the “blue” in blue shark – they could potentially respond to the animals’ environment to change their colors. Narrow spacing between layers of guanine crystals gives the sharks the blues, but if those spaces widen, they can potentially turn shark skin green or yellow.
Chameleons also get their color-changing abilities by shuffling guanine crystals around. In the shark’s case, this could naturally boost their camouflaging capabilities. If they dive deeper, for instance, the greater water pressure should push the crystal layers closer together, darkening their skin to match the darker waters.
At this stage, the effects have only been simulated, but the team plans to study how the mechanism might function in the natural environment of wild sharks, to gain a deeper understanding of how nature engineers color at the nanoscale.
The research was presented at the Society for Experimental Biology Annual Conference in Belgium.
What does it take to make it as a wristspinner in Test cricket? In this detailed chat about the craft, India’s record-breaking legspinner Anil Kumble talks about what coaches need to teach young spinners, the toll that legspin can exert on the body, his hopes for Kuldeep Yadav, and… why he found Sachin Tendulkar so aggravating.
Legspin in Test cricket is something I grew up watching. And I’m sure, generations before that did – including yours. But we don’t see it much these days. Yeah, I know. It’s disappointing not to see that. Probably Yasir Shah was the last of the [Test] legspinners, so to speak, consistently playing for Pakistan. But post that, Kuldeep [Yadav] is the other spinner who I love to watch.
It’s not just about the skill. It’s also about setting batters up and then sort of bamboozling them with something that they read wrongly. And all those intricacies, the drama that you want to see in Test cricket, certainly legspinners bring that.
Less than 4% of all balls bowled in Test cricket in 2024 were by wristspinners. That used to be much higher in the mid-2000s, and even more before. Do we have reason to ask why none of the Test-playing nations seem to be aspiring to produce the next Shane Warne, the next Anil Kumble, who still rank among the five leading wicket-takers in Tests. Is that not an ambition anymore? I don’t know. Even in first-class cricket you tend to not see too many legspinners coming in. White-ball cricket has certainly seen wristspin – probably because of the captains wanting a bowler beating both edges, irrespective of who the batter is, right-hander or left-hander. But I’d like to see someone really come through the ranks. Now that [R] Ashwin is not there for India and [Ravindra] Jadeja is towards the back end of his career, hopefully Kuldeep will get a longer rope and then somebody else may come through.
The number of wristspinners in white-ball cricket has gone up because of the huge appetite for them among T20 franchises. The India white-ball side in 2019 under Virat Kohli took a step away from fingerspin to attack with Yuzvendra Chahal and Kuldeep Yadav. But the job description is different there. Is that resulting in a loss of red-ball wristspinners? Yeah, possibly. And also, you need captains to have a little bit of patience. Especially in first-class cricket or in red-ball cricket. You need for these spinners to develop over time. You can’t get results straightaway. There will be the odd short ball, the odd full toss. And if a captain now is looking to sort of restrict [scoring] and look at bowlers who can bat, there are too many things that you need to tick for you to be a part of a playing XI in red-ball cricket. It’s not just about your wicket-taking ability. So it becomes a bit more challenging now, I guess.
Why did you choose to be a legspinner and who did you look up to? I certainly looked up to someone like BS Chandrasekhar [though] obviously I had not seen much of his bowling. I chose legspin because there were not too many legspinners around in my age group. My brother just said, why don’t you bowl legspin? Fast bowling was something [where] the seniors in my club said I chucked – you know, my elbow bends.
“[Earlier] spin was something that every team had irrespective of where they played, and that was a weapon. Whereas now, some of the teams are using it more as a defensive option”
Did they say that or was it actually the other kids who said it? No, I don’t know. As a young player, you don’t know exactly – you don’t have the strength to bowl 22 yards. So maybe the elbow was coming into play when I was bowling fast.
I didn’t know the grip of legspin, nothing, no formal coaching. So I just held the ball like an offspinner and then bowled. I knew that I had to rotate the wrist the other way around. And that was my grip. So it was an offspinner’s grip [but] bowling legspin.
So the first wristspin delivery you bowled in any kind of reasonably competitive game was at what age? At 14, yes, in the nets. And then immediately, within a couple of months, I represented Karnataka in the Under-15 age group. And since then, I never looked back.
Was it because you were moving to legspin that you perhaps developed a greater interest in how Chandrasekhar bowled? Yes. And the other fact was also that in Karnataka, there was an U-15 inter-school tournament where I was chosen as one of the allrounders. And there were a group of 30 kids, under 15, for a one-month summer camp. And I was fortunate that it was BS Chandrasekhar who was the coach. That probably was my initiation into representative cricket.
He was still bowling at that time. This was prior to his unfortunate [motor] accident [in 1994]. So he would bowl in the nets. As a young kid, you would just be mesmerised by him running in and bowling. He said to me: you should lengthen your run-up, because that will give you the momentum and better control and accuracy, and [it will] probably suit you. And that run-up sort of stuck with me for the rest of my career.
Play
02:40
‘I chose legspin because there weren’t too many legspinners around’
I’m guessing it also appealed to you because you had an innate desire to bowl like a quick bowler. So it didn’t take a lot for you to become the kind of legspinner we still consider as being not orthodox – like Chandra was as well. Yes, he was very different. He couldn’t really… he had polio-affected arms. So he had to sort of wind himself up to bowl. And that’s one of the reasons why he was that quick. And I was similar. So I used to bowl it quick. And for me, being tall, I could never look to flight the ball because I felt that was not me.
When you grew up watching cricket, you had Chandra and Abdul Qadir bowling. Richie Benaud was a well-known presence in the world even if you probably never watched him bowl live. You had inspirations and success stories. Who are the role models for a 13-14-year-old bowling now? Yasir Shah was a while ago. Australia haven’t found a successor to Warne. And now the heroes will be white-ball wristspinners. I guess the game has changed now. I mean, if you look at inspirations, generally [these days] you sort of look towards batters and big hitters.
White-ball cricket has meant that you have to be slightly different. Offspinners are bowling carrom balls and trying to come up with different deliveries.
The mystery of spin needs to be there. That is something that I think all kids tend to sort of grow up [knowing]. As a coach, I’m sure, as a 14-year-old, if you’re bowling just offspin, the coach might say, why don’t you bowl a carrom ball? Because that’s the kind of requirement now in white-ball cricket. I’m a bit surprised that people don’t consider [taking up] legspin, because automatically there’s a bit of mystery there – you have the opportunity to go different ways.
So I certainly feel that, like I mentioned, you need some sort of patience if you’re a captain or a team to have a legspinner develop into a consistent bowler.
“It was all about angles, pace, trajectory for me, and not necessarily legspin, googly, flipper”
How hard is it to bowl legspin? It’s not easy to bowl six deliveries in one place because of the action itself and the [way the] wrist [needs to be]. So it takes time. For some people it comes naturally. For me it was not natural. I had to sort of develop.
Since I was a fast bowler before, I could get the accuracy. So that [part] came naturally to me. I guess for a youngster, if someone’s sort of naturally doing that, then I think you need to continue to encourage that girl or boy to sort of try and do that.
Do you fear that there aren’t incentives to develop this skill? Test cricket was looking for wristspinners through the ’90s because it was felt that if you didn’t have a wristspinner, you’d never be able to make an inroad on flat pitches – your fast bowlers wouldn’t be enough. Now in Test cricket everyone’s happy with a fingerspinner who can bat. No one’s even looking for a wristspinner anymore. It is a concern because you look at world cricket. When I was playing, the great Shane Warne was there. You had Mushtaq Ahmed for Pakistan. Then I was playing here. [Muthiah] Muralidaran was a spinner [in Sri Lanka]. Daniel Vettori… So you had some wonderful spinners playing in every team.
Now, spin other than India, and perhaps Australia, to a large extent has become sort of only used when you’re coming to the subcontinent. [Earlier] spin was something that every team had irrespective of where they played, and that was a weapon. It was not just a defensive option. Whereas now, some of the teams are using it more as a defensive option.
Even the Indian mindset has changed. You’re looking at faster bowlers now trying to win you Test matches, rather than looking at spinners. Someone like an Ashwin [hardly ever] played outside of India. I felt that he should have played a lot more than he eventually played outside of India.
When you grew up, how hard did you have to work to become an accurate wristspinner? Take me through your journey. My journey was just continuing to bowl. You just didn’t stop bowling. And that’s how you develop accuracy. That’s how you learn your trade. It’s repetitive, it’s a mind thing. The body needs to be in the right position for you to bowl the ball. And when you know that everything is aligned, the more you do it, the better you get.
The toll it took on your body to bowl all day versus the toll it took on a fingerspinner’s body – could you try and articulate what the difference was? I was slightly quicker. So I had to have that kind of run-up and the action and the follow-through for me to be effective. Because I didn’t really turn the ball that much.
For an offspinner, for example, or a left-hand spinner, the control was always there because turning it this way rather than this way [demonstrates with wrist facing inwards and then outwards] is probably a lot easier when it comes to control. So for me, I had to bowl a lot more in the nets. You start the net, and till the end of the net, you’re bowling, irrespective of who’s batting. And that’s how you develop your art. That’s how you learn about how you can subtly vary pace, angles. It was all about angles, pace, trajectory for me, and not necessarily legspin, googly, flipper. At least when I was first trying to develop.
So would you say it took a greater toll on the body than for an offspinner who also bowled that long? Oh yeah. My shoulder was gone. Through my career in the ’90s, strength training wasn’t really [a] thing. Only after I got injured did I realise the importance of strength training. It was mostly about cardiovascular training [back then]. You kept running, you ran up and down the steps, and you did all the running training, cardio training. I never went to a gym for about ten years, until I was 30. At the end of it, there were stages where I sat down at the end of the day after a Test match and I couldn’t even lift my hand. It would be so sore. And you had to put ice on it and then take a few painkillers and ensure that you were ready for the next day.
And the kind of physios that you have now, the kind of support systems that you have now, I wish we had those kinds of support systems. But you just went through pain, you just pushed yourself. Look, no matter what, you just had to go and bowl.
“[When I was coaching in the IPL] a few bowlers would just run in and bowl three or four overs in the nets and say, “I’m happy now.” I’d say, I know you need to bowl four overs in the match, but at nets, you would like to bowl more because that’s how you get better control of your skill”
Did you sleep poorly as well? Yeah, I mean I had pain in my shoulder. Probably because I had some problem there. Probably because there was an impingement or whatever, at that point in time. So I just took a few injections. If you went to a social gathering at the end of the evening and someone came and tried to shake my hand, it was like that [lifts right arm with left hand under elbow for support]. So it was that bad. And you ended up trying to push through that pain and you just went about doing it. You were stiff and you had to stretch it out and then do some exercises to be ready for the next day.
But having said that, I think once I started building up strength, it became that much easier. In fact, I was much stronger after my surgery [on his shoulder, in 2001]. And I was probably stronger and fitter after 30 rather than between 20 to 30.
Is the legspinner’s action as unnatural a thing as perhaps a slingy-action fast bowler’s, where we think, oh my god, what’s this doing to his body? Even for a conventional leggie – we were talking the other day about Suyash Sharma, whose head tilts away acutely when he delivers. Where would you put bowling wristspin in terms of the most unnatural things the human body has to do in cricket? Bowling itself is unnatural. If I give you a ball and say you need to get it to that person ten metres away, you’re not going to bowl. You’re going to throw it. So that’s natural. Whereas bowling is unnatural. So the shoulder gets sort of clogged and that’s the impingement that you have every time you bowl. Invariably it puts pressure on your back, your lower back, and the effort that you put in when you land – it may not equate to a fast bowler running in and bowling at 150 [kph], but it certainly puts pressure on your back, and that was something that I always felt. I was fortunate that I didn’t have too many injuries in my career. Shoulder was one. Back troubled me on and off. Right towards the end of my career, my foot started to trouble me. Otherwise I was generally fine to go and bowl.
All of us who grew up watching cricket around the ’90s and 2000s, when we watched Warne, we thought, wow, this is easy. That was poetry. He was someone who was exceptional – exceptionally talented, gifted, and he could make the ball talk. He had control. We had conversations about how he thought. How did he set batters up? He would ask me and I would share my views on a few batters and what I would do. So those conversations [happened] whenever we played against each other.
Play
03:05
‘At the end of the day, I couldn’t even lift my hand’
It was wonderful to sit back and watch him bowl, or Murali bowl. And I knew that, okay, this is what he is trying to do, because at the end of it, it’s still a mind game. Yes, you may have different skills, but you need to know when to do what. And that’s the best part about bowling. When to use which variation? And how do you ensure that you’re setting him up for what you’re looking for, which is a wicket?
When Warne bowled, we thought he was born to bowl legspin, and that there was no way it could be something that was unnatural or hard for him. But would you say, whether from your conversations with him or speaking generally, that it took as much of a toll on his body as, say, it did on your own? Of course. He was strong. His upper body was much stronger, he was really strong in his shoulders. But the effort you could see, you could see that he was giving it a proper rip. So the wrist, the shoulder – when you’re doing that, all of those muscles come in. And yes, he also had a shoulder issue. I’m sure he had a back issue as well. So he had to go through those grinds.
Is it actually physically more demanding than even fast bowling, given you have to generate pace and accuracy from a shorter run-up? I’m sure a few fast bowlers may want to contest this. I would say probably equal because you’re bowling that much longer. Because invariably, if a fast bowler bowled 20 overs in a Test match, I would end up bowling 40 or 50. So which meant that literally I was doubling up on the number of overs.
And are your margins smaller? Where the bad ball of the leggie is actually easier to hit than the bad ball of the quick? Of course. It is. Margins are lesser. And the batter doesn’t have the fear of getting hit. As a fast bowler, you at least have that option – of injuring the batter.
One of my colleagues, Karthik Krishnaswamy, did a detailed analysis piece about how few wristspinners we have in Test cricket now. Cricket often goes without wristspinners for a while because they are so hard to produce. And I’m guessing because of the toll it takes on the body, and the mindset needed, we don’t get them. I’m wondering if we were blessed in watching a generation of yourself and Warnie and Mushtaq Ahmed all bowl together, and we may not see legspinners for a long time. Yeah, especially in red-ball cricket. I think it’s unlikely. And that’s why I think we need to celebrate someone like Kuldeep Yadav. I would like to see him playing Test match cricket more often, because on any surface, the batsman is still unsure [against legspin]. He doesn’t know which way the ball is going to go. That’s something that you want to see and encourage. And I thought that there would be a few more legspinners who would line up to bowl in red-ball cricket. Someone like Chahal, I thought, would make it to the Test match cricket arena. I know it was difficult for Chahal to get in because of Ashwin and Jadeja and Kuldeep. But I would have wanted to see him compete. I think he just gave up competing [for a spot in] red-ball cricket. Although he was really exceptional in white-ball cricket.
“For you [as a wristspinner] to be [in consideration] when you get a flat deck is for you to be successful. Unless you pick those five-wicket hauls, you’re not going to get opportunities in red-ball cricket”
Warnie’s success was so much about the ability to get the ball to drift. That’s not necessarily something you are asked to work on in white-ball cricket, where it’s more about bowling wide or bowling away from a batter’s arc. Do you think the education and training for white-ball cricket takes away from a legspinner’s chances of playing Test cricket? It does, because you still have to play those long formats to be successful. To get the kind of drift that Warnie or somebody like that was getting, you need to give it a proper rip.
And you need to bowl long spells to understand your own bowling. Because [in T20] you’re just bowling four overs. You know, the last time that I was coach in franchise cricket, for Punjab [Kings], there were a few bowlers who would just run in and bowl three overs or four overs in the nets and say, “I’m happy now.” I’d say, come on, I know you need to bowl four overs in the match, but at nets, you would like to bowl more because that’s how you get better control of your skill, of what you’re trying to achieve. I would end up bowling about one and a half hours in the nets, you know, at 50 years.
You were bowling that much as coach? Yeah, as coach. I mean, it was Covid conditions, so you needed the extra bowler to run in and bowl! But I think what is important is for the mindset. You know, the mindset has shifted now to saying, “I know I need to bowl four overs in a T20. I’m happy with bowling just that half hour in the nets because that’s all it takes for me to bowl different deliveries. And I’ll be ready for the match.”
You’re a big wildlife man, I know. So you understand about the preservation of species. So let’s say I put you in charge of the preservation of legspinners. How do we preserve them? How do we increase their numbers? Because I’d like to think India should at least aspire to have red-ball wristspinners in future. It needs to be forced, I guess, in some way. Because if you look back at the way faster bowlers came through the ranks [in India], the pitches were prepared like that. There were green tops and there was a concentrated effort on building fast bowling. So maybe that’s something that one needs to do. Saying okay, every team – well, not necessarily every team, maybe at least one in two teams, needs to have a wristspinner.
And you need to prepare the pitches. At the end of it, if the pitches are flat and you’re just running in and getting smashed every game that you play, for one, the captain’s not going to play you [more]. Two, the confidence level will go away. You need to give [legspinners] those kinds of opportunities and also create an environment where you’re giving them enough to succeed. Because until you succeed, you’re not going to get that confidence. So as a young spinner, you need to be picking wickets, winning matches, for you to continue to be passionate about doing that day in, day out.
If you’re not doing that, if you’re getting smashed every ball and you’re [bowling on] flat decks, that’s not going to work. Or if you’re going to give green tops and say, you know what, you’re not needed, we’ll only look at you in case [we know the pitch will turn]. That’s not going to work.
Will a flat deck help, though, for a red-ball legspinner? That’s where you might think he’ll have an edge over a fingerspinner. Oh yes. But for you to even be [in consideration] when you get a flat deck is for you to be successful. Unless you pick those five-wicket hauls, you’re not going to get opportunities in red-ball cricket. So you need to create that environment. When you’re developing spin, you know – let’s leave wristspin for a moment and say we want to develop spinners in India – you need to provide surfaces where spinners can be successful. You need to give them a little bit of help. Otherwise they’re not going to be successful – it’s going to be very difficult to get a consistent performance from a spinner, a standout spinner. But it’s not easy because the shift is more towards white-ball cricket.
In red-ball cricket, India produced far more spin-friendly surfaces – to the point where enough of them could be called rank turners. In many ways, that brought in the spin-bowling allrounders – which Ashwin, Jadeja and even Axar Patel were at home. But it also took away the need for a wristspinner like yourself, who would be a threat on days one and two, and almost unplayable later, on the traditional wickets. I know batters complain about rank turners in India, but aren’t wristspinners also right to be aggrieved about these kind of surfaces? Yes, they are. Like I said, at the domestic level you need to first start training them so that they are successful. And only then – I mean, the pitches that get prepared for domestic cricket and for Test cricket are probably chalk and cheese.
How are you going to build that kind of a pipeline if you want to be successful at Test level with a wristspinner coming on board? And then once you [as a spinner] get that kind of success [in domestic cricket], it’s easier for you to go abroad and [bowl]. I feel someone like a Kuldeep should be playing more often than not for India in Test match cricket, because he can win you matches. Like you said, on day one, get you a couple of wickets. And the best part about wristspin, I feel, is they can run through sides. It’s not just about getting that one. It’s also about two, three, four, five. Just literally pushing the game beyond the opposition.
“How do you bowl your first over? How do you bowl a spell? I think those are things that need to be taught. You need to construct your spell in a manner where the pressure is always on the batter. Because ultimately it’s the pressure that gets a batter out”
Is there a wristspinner you see today who makes you go, wow? I’ve seen a few in this IPL, you know, although I’ve not seen them in red-ball cricket. I think Vipraj [Nigam] certainly is someone who has it in him. He bowls that much quicker, he has all the variations. He’s only 21, and I feel he’s someone who you can develop into a red-ball bowler.
Zeeshan [Ansari] probably is more classical. You can develop him into a red-ball bowler. But I feel between the two, maybe a Vipraj will… I see that he has potential. Certainly to play white-ball formats, for sure – T20. Because he can bat. He’s a good fielder. He bowls in different, sort of, sections of the game. He has the natural repetitive action that you need for the longer format.
Did you ever think, when it was taking a toll on your body in the early years: What am I doing bowling legspin? Might as well just try a bit of fingerspin. It’d be so much easier. Less toll on the shoulder and whatnot. No, I knew that this was the only way that I could be successful. And for me, I was not an orthodox spinner. So obviously, you know, I had to be different. I had to be in the face of the batter every ball. And I had to put in that kind of body behind every ball. Because I didn’t have the skill of a Shane Warne, who would probably beat the batter from the hand. I didn’t have that. I had to sort of literally beat batters with pace – that was my strength. Batters expected it to come slower, but I was slightly quicker. And that would beat them either bowled or lbw or caught at short leg or silly point with bounce and pace, rather than turn and guile. So for me it was more to push myself doing that day in, day out.
Pace is something we regularly mention in relation to Kuldeep, about his ability to adapt pace for formats. At one point he was too slow for T20 cricket, and then he was firing it in, which didn’t help him in the longer formats. Now wristspinners are all starting off bowling quick through the air because that is something that the white-ball game demands. But you also have to be able to slow it down when needed in ODIs or in Test cricket. What sort of challenge do you think that is? So if you’re someone who bowls slightly quicker, like me, the challenge was to slow things down. And same for someone who’s slow in the air, for that person to bowl quicker. See, I think people get confused when you say Kuldeep should bowl quicker. It’s not about the pace in the air. Yes, that is there, but it’s off the pitch. Off the pitch, it needs to zip through. So that’s something that you need. That’s the only way that you can beat a batter.
And you’re basically generating that with your shoulder. With your shoulder, with your action, with your body. All of that needs to sort of go one [after] the other, so that you get that kind of pace off the surface. And that is what you see in a bowler. When you’re looking at talent – X versus Y, why is this guy better? Although he may not have the variations of the other guy, he’s probably more consistent with the pace at which it comes off the surface. So that’s why I felt someone like a Vipraj has that – whatever I’ve seen, it’s only four overs that you see, but off the surface, he has that zip.
What does the mindset of a wristspinner have to be if he wants to play long-form cricket, where you’re saying, I’m going to find a way to get the batter out defending. When Rashid Khan plays Test cricket today, great white-ball bowler that he is, it’s a huge challenge for him to get batters out on the defence. How much of that is mindset? It’s mindset and control. And I think it’s also about having that ability to vary length and pace with consistency. And that will only come if you practise day in, day out. And then, of course, the [knowledge] to bowl which ball when, and what length when, what line when. I think those are something that you learn as you play more and more.
Is this something that can be taught? Or are we just going to wait till the next naturally born leggie comes out? The next guy who thinks like Anil Kumble or aspires to be a legspinner or who’s born with the gifts of Shane Warne? Must cricket simply wait? No, what I feel is, coaches tend to sort of teach young cricketers how to bowl legspin. You know that you don’t need that. I mean, basically you sort of know what the grip is. And you know that if you do this, it’s legbreak, if you do this, it’s a googly. You do that, that’s a flipper. Yeah, those are things that you can teach. But I think what is more critical is, which I don’t think gets taught enough or at least shared enough, is the ability to take wickets. Like for a batter, yes, defence, cover drive, technique, all that is [important]. But how do you score runs? How do you plan your fifties? How do you plan your hundreds?
How do you bowl your first over? How do you bowl a spell? I think those are things that need to be taught. And that can only come with experience, and that needs to be shared. Because that is the [basis] of how successful you can be. Because it’s not just about bowling the beautiful ball in the first over and then after that, you bowl rubbish. Then it doesn’t work. You need to construct your spell in a manner where the pressure is always on the batter. Because ultimately it’s the pressure that gets a batter out, not necessarily the skill sets that you have. Yes, the skill sets, the kind of bowling you have, will build pressure. So that’s what you need to do. As long as you can hold that pressure for a long time, you have a better chance of getting a batter out.
“If you want to become a match-winner, you need that X factor, whether you’re a batter or a fast bowler or a spinner. That X factor comes naturally to you by bowling wristspin, because there is an element of doubt as to which way the ball is going”
Watching Digvesh Rathi this year, it seemed like we may not get the legspinner, but we may get someone who actually bowls a pretty decent legbreak, as well as the carrom ball or the offie. Liam Livingstone might have opened the door for bowlers who can bowl legspin and offspin. Is it likely that we will find right-arm all-spin before right-arm legspin? Yeah, you need that. I mean, we saw, I think… who was that – Kamindu Mendis?
Oh, that was ambidextrous. I think he’s just right-arm straight and left-arm straight. I know. So that’s something that I’m sure you’ll see. You’ll see a lot of bowlers now wanting to take the ball away from both left-handers and right-handers, whether you do it with the carrom ball or the conventional way of a legbreak.
Don’t you need two actions for that? Rathi seems like an outlier, where he’s managing to bowl the two pretty much the same. So even Varun Chakravarthy does that a little bit. I guess it’s a matter of camouflaging it. How little can the batter see the variation is what you’re trying to hide. If the batter knows that this is what is coming, it becomes that much easier. So you’re trying to sort of keep that [hidden] slightly longer, so the batter gets less time to react.
All you’re trying to do as a bowler is to create doubt in the batter’s mind. And you do that, the bowler needs to figure out.
Let’s say you’re making a pitch to young kids who are taking up cricket for the first time, and perhaps their parents as well, about why they should want to bowl legspin. Not just as a T20 bowler but as someone who could be among the top wicket-takers. Give them good reasons. Because you can win matches. Yes, if you’re a batter who can destroy a bowling attack, you can certainly win matches. But as a bowler, if you have those tricks up your sleeve that are not easy for the batters to pick, you can win matches. So if you want to become a match-winner, you need that X factor, whether you’re a batter or a fast bowler or a spinner.
That X factor comes naturally to you by bowling wristspin, because there is an element of doubt as to which way the ball is going. And [the key is to] develop that from a young age, and then start bowling a lot, to understand your own skills. Because it’s all about the mind.
As soon as the ball is released from your hand, you [should] know where exactly it’s going to land. So you need the subconscious mind to absorb all of that. For that to happen, it’s a repetitive process. You just need to go through it day in, day out, doing the same thing, trying to understand: if I do this, this is what happens, and if I do that, this is what happens. Once you understand that, the ability to use what when and how depends on situations and the surface and the batter that you’re facing.
You have spoken so much in the past about how much the game has given you, how much cricket has done for you. India had many great batters. Among bowlers, yes, there was a Chandra, but the volume of your achievements puts you in a unique category. Do you feel when you look back that you did the right thing bowling legspin? You could have been a quick, could have decided to bat, could have given it away… I’ve really not thought about it in that fashion at all. I’ve always believed that this is what I can do. I’ve never considered myself a classical spinner. So I’ve always had these challenges of trying to prove myself first before trying to prove [things to] anyone else. Saying, look, I need to cross this line because I feel I’m not capable, because of the skills that I have. When you look at a Warnie or a Mushy, or a Murali for that matter – all of them could spin it big. But I didn’t do that.
I had to create my own style. So I felt that for me every day was a challenge, whether it was practice, whether it was a match. That mindset probably helped me get to where I eventually ended up. I think it’s all about what your mind wants you to do rather than wanting to have a different skill. Everyone has limitations and [it’s about] understanding those limitations early in your life and then working on how you can mask them, basically. Everyone has those. Unless you’re a [Sachin] Tendulkar. He had probably the greatest of all the gifts. And he was blessed. But he also worked hard at it. Let me say it: he worked really hard at his game.
But for someone like me, I had to sort of work on my strength day in, day out. But also try and figure out how I can mask those limitations.
“If you have that attitude of wanting to win at any cost, irrespective of what the conditions are, I think that helps you to deliver better, helps your game go one notch higher. It’s not about the skills, It’s about your mindset. It’s about the attitude on the field”
I’m just going to sidetrack for a little. Did it ever annoy you if you and Sachin bowled in the nets and Sachin suddenly just decided to bowl legbreaks? Always. Always. I say this every time! I said it to Sachin as well. I said, thank god you didn’t take legspin seriously. Because otherwise, I wouldn’t have played. Because he was someone who could do everything. He would just wobble like that in nets and then turn it this big.
And he can bowl a googly as well, and then he would bowl a flipper. He would do everything. Suddenly bowl offspin, bowl outswing, inswing.
Why was it so easy for him to bowl? I did sort of look at his grip and try to see if I could get that going. But I never got it. I said, no, I can’t do this. And yeah, he was gifted. And I was glad that he didn’t take up legspin – seriously!
Did he ever come to you and say, why do you put so much effort into it – the jump and long run? No, he certainly knew that it required a lot more effort than just having… you had to bowl about 30-40 overs.
In India we worship our cricketers. Especially those from your generation, which felt like a golden generation. When you meet all the great batters you played with, you somewhere feel, yeah, batters might be the toast of the nation with their achievements and runs, and there’s only ever one Tendulkar and one Dravid… But do you sense your team-mates respect your achievements more because of your skill? Because I’ve heard this when I’ve worked with you in multiple studios – every one of your colleagues, they all just go: what this man did… You reached the pinnacle of perhaps the hardest thing in the game. Yeah, I think being a bowler is not easy. It’s tough because you just have to go through the process and the grind of doing it repetitively, whether you like it or not, whether the conditions are in your favour or not. You just have to go there. Probably, you know, I certainly know that the respect is there. And it’s mutual. And I think I’ve earned that respect because of the attitude that I had on the field.
Yes, the results were different. But I think more importantly, if you have that attitude on the field of wanting to win at any cost, irrespective of what the conditions are, I think that helps you to deliver better, helps your game go one notch higher. It’s not about the skills. Skills I think everybody has. It’s about your mindset. It’s about the attitude on the field, which sort of determines whether you can succeed consistently or not.
So I guess when you’re looking at young players, it’s also their hunger and attitude that you’re looking at, not necessarily just the skill.
Is the ten-for more pleasing or the Test hundred? Ten-fer, I guess, because that’s something that you don’t really think of. I mean, it’s destiny. I believed that I could get a hundred every innings. But I never thought that I would get a ten-fer every time I bowled. Every time I batted, I felt that I could get a hundred.
I felt like there was more emotion when you got the Test hundred. The happiness was there. Yeah, obviously. I came close to a few of those in my career – [where I made] 70 or 80 but didn’t eventually cross the line. I had a few first-class hundreds. But when this eventually happened, it was certainly something that… I certainly got emotional. More than me, I think the team-mates were happier than I was on that day.
Do you think we’ll see a legspinner come close to 619 or 708 Test wickets? I don’t know about Test cricket. I’m not really sure. The numbers are not there anymore. I mean, the focus is more towards white ball cricket. But someone like a Kuldeep, I think, will bowl and get wickets in Test match cricket and in white-ball cricket, because he’s someone who has that skill and he’s wonderful to watch.
Yeah, I mean, 600 is just a number. I’m sure if you continue to play and play longer, then those numbers can be achieved. It’s just that I would like to see wristspinners. And I’m happy that at least in white-ball cricket, you’re seeing them in most teams now – at least one bowler. I’d like to see that often in red-ball cricket too.
Raunak Kapoor is deputy editor (video) and lead presenter for ESPNcricinfo. @RaunakRK