Author: admin

  • She’s 95, eats ice cream, golfs weekly & lives like a ‘superwoman’: Her 9 habits might be the real anti-ageing secret

    She’s 95, eats ice cream, golfs weekly & lives like a ‘superwoman’: Her 9 habits might be the real anti-ageing secret

    At 95, Sally Froelich is living proof that age is just a number. From working at Macy’s in the 1950s to hosting her own talk show for over 20 years, Froelich’s life has been full of charm, purpose, and positivity. Now, she’s part of the SuperAgers Family Study, a major research effort by the American Federation for Aging Research, trying to uncover the secrets of healthy ageing.

    The study, highlighted by Healthline, involves 600 participants aged 95 and above, including their children and their children’s spouses. According to Dr Sofiya Milman, who leads the research at the Albert Einstein College of Medicine, the aim is to discover the genes responsible for exceptional longevity.

    But Sally’s story reminds us: healthy habits still matter. Here are her 9 tips for a long and healthy life, as featured in Healthline.

    1. Eat mindfully

    “I eat three meals a day. I don’t overeat,” says Froelich. A balanced, consistent diet supports energy levels, immune health, and weight management.

    2. Avoid harmful habits

    Sally never smoked and drinks alcohol only in moderation. Experts agree that avoiding smoking and heavy drinking reduces the risk of heart disease and cancer.

    3. Maintain a stable weight

    Her weight hasn’t changed in 50 years. Froelich says, “My body shape changed, but the number didn’t.” Stable weight helps protect joints and reduce disease risk.

    4. Stay physically active

    She still plays golf two to three times a week and exercises six days a week. Her routine includes stretching, sit-ups, and light weight training, all great for heart and muscle health.

    5. Keep your brain busy

    From bridge games to audiobooks, Froelich keeps her mind sharp. Staying mentally active helps prevent memory loss and cognitive decline.

    6. Stay socially connected

    She often dines out, talks to her children, and regularly checks in with her grandchildren on Zoom. “If I’ve been inside too long, I walk around the block,” she says.

    7. Enjoy the little things

    “Do what makes you happy. Eat ice cream and delicious chocolate,” she says. Finding joy in simple pleasures boosts emotional wellbeing.

    8. Look after yourself

    “Keep your hair and nails done,” she advises. Self-care boosts confidence and mood, which also helps reduce stress.

    9. Think positively about ageing

    Experts featured in Healthline say that a positive mindset about ageing can extend your life by up to 7.5 years.

    Genes vs Lifestyle: What matters more?

    Dr Milman explains that while many SuperAgers share certain genes, like those affecting HDL cholesterol or growth hormone, lifestyle still plays a role. “They didn’t eat, drink, or exercise differently than their peers, but they lived much longer,” she told Healthline.

    However, Dr Rosanne Leipzig, geriatrician and author of Honest Aging, adds that genetics only explain about 20–40% of lifespan. “The rest is shaped by environment, access to healthcare, childhood diet, and even your neighbourhood.”

    So, while not everyone may reach 95 like Sally Froelich, her life reminds us that joy, movement, and connection can go a long way.

    Disclaimer: This article is for informational purposes only and not a substitute for professional medical advice. Always seek the advice of your doctor with any questions about a medical condition.

    Continue Reading

  • Toxic PFAS Contaminate Eggs, Meat, and Milk

    Toxic PFAS Contaminate Eggs, Meat, and Milk

    Following a recent cadmium exposure alert from the Union régionale des professionnels de santé-Médecins libéraux, a French regional body representing private practice physicians, attention has shifted to per- and polyfluoroalkyl substances (PFAS), a group of long-lasting industrial chemicals linked to serious health risks.

    Générations Futures, a France-based environmental non-governmental organisation headquartered in Paris that monitors the health and environmental impacts of chemical pollution, raised an alarm after analysing data from the European Food Safety Authority (EFSA), showing widespread PFAS contamination in food across Europe.

    PFAS, often referred to as “forever chemicals,” persist in the environment for decades and enter the human body primarily through dietary exposure.

    According to the French Agency for Food, Environmental and Occupational Health and Safety, this chemical class includes thousands of compounds that have been widely used since the 1950s in industrial and consumer products, including textiles, food packaging, firefighting foams, refrigerant gases, non-stick coatings, cosmetics, medical devices, and pesticides.

    Despite their extensive use, only three PFAS are routinely monitored, and four are subject to regulatory restrictions. However, many others contaminate water and food at levels well above health-based thresholds. PFAS are associated with multiple health risks, including endocrine disruption (such as thyroid dysfunction), metabolic effects (including elevated cholesterol levels), hepatic and renal toxicity, carcinogenicity, reproductive and developmental toxicity, and immune system impairment.

    Alarming Levels

    Générations Futures found that 69% of fish, 55% of offal, 55% of molluscs, 39% of eggs, 27% of crustaceans, 23% of milk, and 14% of meat samples contained at least one of the four PFAS currently regulated in food. In addition, the group identified seven other hazardous, non-regulated PFAS in samples of offal, fish, and eggs.

    The EFSA has established a tolerable weekly intake (TWI) of 4.4 ng ingested per kg of body weight for the combined exposure to the four regulated PFAS.

    According to the data analysed in the report, a 4-year-old child consuming a single egg would exceed this limit by 1.4 times. A 60-kg adult consuming 500 g of meat would ingest 2.5 times the TWI.

    The report highlighted that current regulatory limits prioritise economic considerations over public health. Authorities have set threshold limits on contamination levels according to observed contamination levels, aiming to remove only the most polluted products from the market. These limits also vary by food type and lack a consistent scientific basis.

    Générations Futures calls on public authorities to follow the example of Germany and the Netherlands by implementing systematic monitoring of PFAS levels across all food types, not just meat, offal, and fish, and by strengthening regulations to limit emissions and reduce exposure.

    The group supports the adoption of the PFAS restriction proposal 2023 under the Registration, Evaluation, Authorisation and Restriction of Chemicals regulation, which aims to ban or limit approximately 10,000 PFAS compounds. The group also called for the revision of the PFAS limits set at the European level to better protect public health.

    This story was translated from Univadis France.

    Continue Reading

  • 82 more Palestinians martyred by Israeli forces in Gaza – RADIO PAKISTAN

    1. 82 more Palestinians martyred by Israeli forces in Gaza  RADIO PAKISTAN
    2. Israeli attacks kill 82 amid forced displacement plans, truce talks in Gaza  Al Jazeera
    3. Israeli offensive in Gaza intensifies, humanitarian crisis deepens  Ptv.com.pk
    4. Israeli strike kills at least 10 children queueing for medical treatment in Gaza  The Guardian
    5. Israeli strikes hit displaced persons’ tents in Gaza; raids reported in West Bank  Dawn

    Continue Reading

  • Violence Often Continues Across Care Settings

    Violence Often Continues Across Care Settings

    TOPLINE:

    A study showed that more than 28% of patients who exhibited violent behavior continued exhibiting that violence in subsequent healthcare settings, often beginning out-of-hospital and continuing in the emergency department (ED) or hospital.

    METHODOLOGY:

    • Researchers conducted an observational cohort study to assess violence across multiple care settings at a large academic center from December 2022 to November 2023.
    • Data were collected from emergency medical service (EMS), ED, hospital, and security records.
    • The analysis included 4721 violent patient encounters (comprising 2791 distinct encounters from 2251 unique patients). Of these, 206 were out-of-hospital, 868 were ED, and 3561 were non-ED hospital violent encounters.
    • The primary outcome was violent patient encounters, including verbal abuse, physical assault, and threats.

    TAKEAWAY:

    • Of the 2791 violent encounters, 28.1% continued into a second care setting, 12.6% into a third, and 7.5% into a fourth.
    • Out-of-hospital settings had the highest rate of violence (18.02 events per 10 hours), followed by the ED (0.35 events per 10 patients); 41.7% of patients who were violent out-of-hospital were violent again in the hospital, with 26.2% specifically in the ED.
    • Out-of-hospital violence occurred in 0.78 per 100 encounters, with ED violence at 1.06 per 100 encounters and non-ED hospital violence at 6.37 per 100 encounters.
    • Patients aged 65 years or older had the lowest incidence of violence in the ED (3.7% vs 24.5%; relative risk [RR], 0.17; 95% CI, 0.13-0.23) and the highest on the general hospital floor (54.1% vs 21.1%; RR, 2.39; 95% CI, 1.37-2.49) compared with younger patients.

    IN PRACTICE:

    “Our findings reveal that workplace violence spans multiple care settings, beginning in the out-of-hospital setting, continuing through the ED, and persisting into inpatient units following admission,” the authors wrote, reflecting on the importance of exploring “contributing factors such as care transitions and underlying risk factors to inform targeted interventions aimed at preventing violence and safeguarding healthcare staff.”

    SOURCE:

    The study was led by Sarayna McGuire, MD, MS, Department of Emergency Medicine, Mayo Clinic, Rochester, Minnesota. It was published online on June 18, 2025, in Annals of Emergency Medicine.

    LIMITATIONS:

    The study results may not be generalizable to patient populations in rural or community hospitals served by EMS agencies that are not affiliated with hospitals and may have limited application to populations other than non-Hispanic White individuals. Other limitations were the potential underreporting of violent events and lack of data on other types of workplace violence.

    DISCLOSURES:

    The authors reported no funding information or relevant conflicts of interest.

    This article was created using several editorial tools, including AI, as part of the process. Human editors reviewed this content before publication.

    Continue Reading

  • Some ICD Recipients May Not Need Defibrillation Testing

    Some ICD Recipients May Not Need Defibrillation Testing

    TOPLINE:

    Among recipients of subcutaneous implantable cardioverter defibrillators, the omission of defibrillation testing (DT) was not associated with significant differences in mortality, or in the rates of appropriate and inappropriate shocks. Obesity and high shock impedance, however, predicted testing failure.

    METHODOLOGY:

    • Current guidelines recommend DT during the implantation of a subcutaneous implantable cardioverter-defibrillator (S-ICD); omissions of DT has yielded conflicting results regarding mortality and shock efficacy.
    • Researchers analyzed data from an ongoing observational study, including 4924 patients who were implanted with S-ICD systems in France between October 2012 and December 2019.
    • The analysis compared outcomes in patients who underwent DT (n = 4066; mean age, 49.6 years; 23.6% women) and those who did not (n=858; mean age, 51.2 years; 22.1% women) over a mean follow-up of 4.2 years.
    • The outcomes included overall mortality, cardiovascular mortality, sudden cardiac death, a composite of sudden cardiac death or death of unknown origin, and appropriate and inappropriate shocks.

    TAKEAWAY:

    • The omission of DT was not associated with an increased risk for any of the outcomes, including all death-related endpoints, or inappropriate and appropriate shocks.
    • DT was successful in 99% of patients; independent predictors of test failure were obesity (adjusted odds ratio [aOR], 2.17; = .042) and shock impedance ≥ 89 Ω (aOR, 4.60; < .001).
    • Ineffective appropriate shocks occurred only in patients who underwent testing.
    • Serious complications related to testing occurred in 0.07% of patients, and two related deaths were reported.

    IN PRACTICE:

    “These findings suggest that omitting DT [defibrillator testing] may be safe for most S-ICD recipients, challenging the necessity of routine testing in all cases,” the researchers reported.

    “Fourth, to our knowledge, this is the first study to report the incidence of complications directly associated with S-ICD testing, estimated at < 1 per 1000, including a 1 per 2000 risk” for death related to testing, they wrote. “However, the occurrence of DT-related deaths in patients with severely impaired LVEF [left ventricular ejection fraction] highlights the importance of a careful risk-benefit assessment in this vulnerable subgroup,” they added. In these cases, the risks associated with testing “may outweigh its potential benefits, warranting individualized clinical decision-making.”

    “The risk-benefit ratio of routinely performing DT seems to favor not doing routine testing,” Raul Weiss, MD, and Jose Sleiman Morales, MD, wrote in an editorial accompanying the journal article. 

    “A commonsense approach, therefore, would be to perform a low-risk 10-J synchronized shock in sinus rhythm to evaluate the system HV [high-voltage] impedance. If the impedance is elevated, (z > 90 U), then the system implantation features should be reevaluated with attention to posterior and preferably intermuscular implantation of the generator and minimal distance between the shocking coil and the sternum. These measures are likely to reduce the HV impedance. If the value remains elevated, then perhaps, in this scenario, DT offers clinical value,” they added.

    SOURCE:

    This study was led by Fawzi Kerkouri, MD, MPH, of European Georges Pompidou Hospital in Paris, France. It was published online on June 30, 2025, in the Journal of the American College of Cardiology. 

    LIMITATIONS:

    Clinicians may have omitted DT in patients with low risk or those with favorable procedural characteristics, introducing selection bias. Residual confounding may have persisted despite adjustments. Some cases of sudden cardiac death may have been misclassified as deaths of unknown origin.

    DISCLOSURES:

    This study was funded by the French Federation of Cardiology and the French Society of Cardiology. The studied device was manufactured by Boston Scientific, which supported the annual meeting of the study investigators. Several authors reported serving as consultants and/or receiving fees from Boston Scientific.

    This article was created using several editorial tools, including AI, as part of the process. Human editors reviewed this content before publication.

    Continue Reading

  • Trump threatens 35% tariffs on Canadian goods

    Trump threatens 35% tariffs on Canadian goods

    US President Donald Trump has said he will impose a 35% tariff on Canadian goods starting on 1 August, even as the two countries were days away from a self-imposed deadline to reach a new trade deal.

    The announcement came in the form of a letter published on Trump’s social media platform Truth Social, along with additional threats of blanket tariffs of 15% or 20% on most trade partners.

    Canadian Prime Minister Mark Carney said his government would continue to protect Canadian workers and businesses as they worked towards the new deadline.

    Trump has sent more than 20 such letters to other US partners this week. He says says he will soon announce new tariffs on the EU, too.

    Like Canada’s letter, Trump has vowed to implement those tariffs by 1 August.

    A blanket 25% tariff has already been imposed on some Canadian goods, with the nation also hit hard by Trump’s global steel, aluminium and auto tariffs – though there is a current exemption in place for goods that comply with a North American free trade agreement.

    It is unclear if the latest tariffs threat would also apply to goods covered by the Canada-United States-Mexico Agreement (CUSMA).

    Trump has also imposed a global 50% tariff on aluminium and steel imports, and a 25% tariff on all cars and trucks not built in the US.

    He also recently announced a 50% tariff on copper imports, scheduled to take effect next month.

    Canada sells about three-quarters of its goods to the US, and is an auto manufacturing hub and a major supplier of metals, making the US tariffs especially damaging to those sectors.

    Trump’s letter said the 35% tariffs were separate to those sector-specific levies.

    “As you are aware, there will be no tariff if Canada, or companies within your country, decide to build or manufacture products within the United States,” Trump stated.

    He also tied the tariffs to what he called “Canada’s failure” to stop the flow of fentanyl into the US, as well as Canada’s existing levies on US dairy farmers and the trade deficit between the two countries.

    “If Canada works with me to stop the flow of Fentanyl, we will, perhaps, consider an adjustment to this letter. These Tariffs may be modified, upward or downward, depending on our relationship with Your Country,” Trump said.

    President Trump has previously accused Canada – alongside Mexico – of allowing “vast numbers of people to come in and fentanyl to come in” to the US.

    In his response on X, Carney said Canada had made essential progress to “stop the scourge of fentanyl” in North America, and that his government was committed to continuing to work alongside the US to protect communities in both countries.

    According to data from the US Customs and Border Patrol, only about 0.2% of all seizures of fentanyl entering the US are made at the Canadian border. Almost all of the rest is confiscated at the US border with Mexico.

    Earlier this year, Canada also announced more funding towards border security and had appointed a fentanyl czar in response to Trump’s complaints.

    Canada has been engaged in intense talks with the US in recent months to reach a new trade and security deal.

    At the G7 Summit in June, Carney and Trump said they were committed to reaching a new deal within 30 days, setting a deadline of 21 July.

    Trump threatened in the letter to increase levies on Canada if it retaliated. Canada has already imposed counter-tariffs on the US, and has vowed more if they failed to reach a deal by the deadline.

    In late June, Carney removed a tax on big US technology firms after Trump labelled it a “blatant attack” and threatened to call off trade talks.

    Carney said the tax was dropped as “part of a bigger negotiation” on trade between the two countries.

    Continue Reading

  • Dollar losing allure for Chinese traders, creates runway for yuan

    Dollar losing allure for Chinese traders, creates runway for yuan

    Banks cut demand for US dollars

    Chinese state-owned banks have gradually shifted from wanting dollars to reducing their demand for it, to offering it out, according to traders who declined to be identified as they’re not authorised to speak publicly.

    Decreasing demand for US dollars

    “The swap points reflect decreasing demand for the dollar as well as optimism toward the room for yuan to strengthen,” said Hao Zhou, chief economist at Guotai Junan Hong Kong Ltd.

    Swaps might have also gained support from easing expectations of interest-rate cuts in China amid upbeat economic data, he said. 

    Fed rate cut expected in September

    From a market pricing perspective, swap points tend to shrink when the interest rate outlook between the US and China starts to align.

    That possibility has grown stronger, with markets anticipating a Federal Reserve rate cut in September and China’s recent economic data exceeding expectations — strengthening the belief the People’s Bank of China can afford to delay further easing. 

    Continue Reading

  • Linklaters advises on SF Holding’s HK$5.9bn placing of shares and convertible bond issuance

    Linklaters advises on SF Holding’s HK$5.9bn placing of shares and convertible bond issuance

    Linklaters advised the joint lead managers on the approximately HK$2.95bn (approximately US$378m) placing of shares and the concurrent issuance of approximately HK$2.95bn (approximately US$378m) of convertible bonds by S.F. Holding Co., Ltd. (SF Holding). 

    Listed on the Shenzhen Stock Exchange and the Hong Kong Stock Exchange, SF Holding is the largest comprehensive logistics service provider in China and Asia. The proceeds from the transaction will be used to strengthen the company’s international and cross-border logistics capabilities, and to support research and development of advanced technologies and digital solutions, among others. 

    The Linklaters team was led by capital markets partner Taiki Ki and corporate partner Donnelly Chan, with support from solicitors Austin Ho and Jun Tang.

    This transaction reinforces Linklaters’ strong track record advising on significant equity-linked transactions in the Asia Pacific region. The team recently acted on a number of the market’s most high-profile deals, including Ping An Insurance’s HK$11.765bn convertible bonds, Chow Tai Fook Jewellery Group’s HK$8.8bn convertible bond issuance, as well as share placings for Innovent Biologics and Keymed Biosciences.

    Continue Reading

  • Trump threatens a 35% tariff on Canadian goods, and he may double what most other nations are charged

    Trump threatens a 35% tariff on Canadian goods, and he may double what most other nations are charged



    CNN
     — 

    President Donald Trump late Thursday threatened a 35% tariff on goods imported from Canada, a dramatic escalation in an on-again, off-again trade war with America’s northern neighbor and one of its most important trading partners.

    And, in a separate NBC News interview, he suggested blanket tariffs on other US trading partners will jump, as well.

    The Thursday actions are the latest examples of a whipsaw policy that’s left investors, trading partners, businesses and everyday Americans alike scrambling to make plans even as the economic ground shifts not just from week to week but in some cases from hour to hour.

    It wasn’t immediately clear if the new tariffs, set to take effect August 1, would apply to all Canadian goods or if Trump’s threat applied only to the limited number of goods on which the United States currently levies tariffs.

    “Throughout the current trade negotiations with the United States, the Canadian government has steadfastly defended our workers and businesses,” Prime Minister Mark Carney said in a statement to X.

    “We will continue to do so as we work towards the revised deadline of August 1.”

    Trump’s announcement of higher tariffs on Canada comes amid a flurry of letters Trump has sent to world leaders over the past week informing them what rates their goods will be tariffed at come August 1, absent any trade deals. Trump has sent nearly two dozen such letters.

    But Canada is by far the largest trading partner with the United States to receive a letter from Trump this week. Canada and the US have been in trade talks with the hopes of reaching a deal by July 21.

    NBC News also reported Thursday that Trump told “Meet the Press” moderator Kristen Welker that the remaining US trading partners that have not yet received trade letters or reached framework agreements will be charged a blanket tariff rate. The United States currently imposes a 10% tariff on nearly all foreign goods coming into the country, but Trump on Thursday said he might double that.

    “We’re just going to say all of the remaining countries are going to pay, whether it’s 20% or 15%. We’ll work that out now,” Trump said, according to NBC News.

    Canada is the top buyer of US exported goods, importing $349 billion worth last year, according to Department of Commerce data. Tariffing Canadian goods could, therefore, backfire if additional retaliatory tariffs are put in place on American goods. (Trump threatened to respond to any such tariffs by raising rates on Canadian goods.)

    Meanwhile, Canada shipped $413 billion worth of goods to the US last year, the third-highest source of foreign goods.

    Back and forth tariffs

    But Canada has been the subject of Trump’s scorn since before he took office. In November 2024, just a few weeks after the election, Trump pledged 25% tariffs on all products from Canada and Mexico on his first day in office “until such time as Drugs, in particular Fentanyl, and all Illegal Aliens stop this Invasion of our Country!”

    A day before those tariffs were set to go into effect in February, Trump paused them for 30 days. They went into effect March 6, but Trump exempted goods that were compliant with the US-Mexico-Canada agreement that he negotiated and signed during his first term in office. That significantly blunted the impact of the tariffs on Canada and Mexico.

    On March 7, Trump threatened new tariffs on Canadian lumber and dairy products.

    “Canada has been ripping us off for years on lumber and on dairy products,” Trump said in an Oval Office address that day, citing Canada’s roughly 250% tariff on US dairy exports to the country. Trump said America would match those tariffs dollar-for-dollar. But the tariffs were never implemented.

    Last month Trump – once again – threatened to hike taxes on Canadian goods over a retroactive digital services tax that was set to take effect, which would have fallen heavily on American tech companies that did business in Canada. In the 11th hour, Canada indefinitely postponed the tax in an effort to continue trade talks and avoid higher tariffs.

    And, throughout, he has often waxed poetic about his desire to see Canada become the 51st state – a proposition Canada has vehemently, and repeatedly, rejected.

    The sectoral tariffs Trump imposed include 50% taxes across all imported steel and aluminum and 25% tariffs on most cars and car parts – some of Canada’s main exports to the US. The tariffs have been charged on Canadian shipments that do not comply with the USMCA, a previous trade agreement.

    In response to those auto tariffs, Canada levied a 25% tariff on US-made vehicles that aren’t compliant with USMCA. Canada also retaliated against Trump’s steel and aluminum tariffs by rolling out a tariffs on billions of dollars worth of US goods, including whiskey, sporting gear and household appliances.

    In Thursday’s letter, Trump mentioned the fentanyl issue, one of his original reasons for tariffing America’s northern neighbor. However, according to US federal statistics, Canada is responsible for a minuscule percentage of illegal fentanyl coming into the US. Of the 21,889 pounds of fentanyl US border authorities seized in the 2024 fiscal year, just 43 pounds – about 0.2% – were seized at the Canadian border.

    “If Canada works with me to stop the flow of Fentanyl, we will, perhaps, consider an adjustment to this letter. These Tariffs may be modified, upward or downward, depending on our relationship with your Country,” Trump said in the letter.

    Late on Thursday night, Carney responded by saying that Canada had made “vital progress to stop the scourge of fentanyl in North America.”

    “We are committed to continuing to work with the United States to save lives and protect communities in both our countries.”

    In February, Carney’s predecessor Justin Trudeau appointed a Fentanyl Czar and launched a new border plan aimed at intercepting fentanyl and other narcotics arriving and leaving Canada.

    Pierre Poilievre, Canada’s Conservative opposition leader, called the tariffs “another unjustified attack on Canada’s economy.”

    “Canada has long been a reliable partner and trusted friend to the United States. These tariffs will damage both our countries,” Poilievre wrote on X.

    This story has been updated with additional context and developments.

    Continue Reading

  • What is the link between gum disease and heart disease, according to Harvard Health |

    What is the link between gum disease and heart disease, according to Harvard Health |

    Gum disease, also known as periodontal disease, is a common condition that affects millions of people worldwide. However, its impact extends beyond oral health, with research suggesting a link between gum disease and an increased risk of heart disease. According to Harvard Health, studies have shown that individuals with poor oral health have higher rates of cardiovascular disease. The connection between gum disease and heart health is complex, but understanding the shared risk factors and taking steps to prevent and treat gum disease can help reduce the risk of cardiovascular disease. By prioritising oral health, individuals can protect their overall well-being and reduce the risk of heart disease.

    How is gum disease linked with heart health?

    The relationship between gum disease and cardiovascular disease is complex. While research suggests a potential link, it’s unclear whether gum disease directly causes cardiovascular disease or if common risk factors contribute to both conditions.

    1. Some scientists believe that the bacteria responsible for gum disease may travel through the bloodstream and trigger inflammation in blood vessels, potentially leading to heart problems.
    2. Others believe that it’s not the bacteria themselves, but rather the body’s immune response to gum disease that causes damage to blood vessels.
    3. It’s also possible that gum disease and heart disease aren’t directly linked, but rather share common risk factors, such as: Smoking: A habit that’s bad for your gums and heart and genetics: Some people might be prone to both conditions due to their genetic history
    4. Poor health habits, such as not taking care of your overall health by exercising regularly or not having access to good healthcare, may increase your risk of both gum disease and heart disease.

    Symptoms of gum disease

    Gum disease

    Recognising the signs of gum disease is crucial for early intervention.

    • Bleeding gums: Especially after brushing or flossing
    • Persistent bad breath
    • Swollen, tender, or red gums
    • Receding gums: Making teeth appear longer
    • Loose or shifting teeth

    Risk factors of gum and heart disease

    Gum disease and heart disease share common risk factors, including:

    • Smoking: Tobacco use weakens the immune system’s response to oral bacteria and contributes significantly to cardiovascular disease.
    • Diabetes: Individuals with diabetes are at higher risk for gum disease and cardiovascular complications.
    • Obesity: Excessive body fat promotes systemic inflammation and insulin resistance, contributing to cardiovascular disease.
    • Poor nutrition: A diet high in sugar, unhealthy fats, and processed foods can contribute to gum disease and heart disease.

    Prevention and treatment of gum disease

    Maintaining good oral hygiene is essential for preventing gum disease and reducing the risk of heart disease. This includes:

    • Brushing twice a day: Use a soft-bristled toothbrush and fluoride toothpaste.
    • Floss daily: It helps remove plaque and food particles between teeth.
    Floss your teeth

    • Using mouthwash: Rinse your mouth with an antibacterial mouthwash to reduce bacteria.
    • Regular dental visits: Schedule regular check-ups to detect and treat gum disease early.

    Managing gum disease and heart health

    If you have gum disease, it’s essential to consult your dentist and healthcare provider to treat both conditions.

    • Deep cleanings, antibiotics, and other treatments may be necessary to control gum disease
    • Regular heart checkups to monitor cardiovascular risk factors and detect any problems early
    • Changing your lifestyle, improving your diet, and increasing physical activity can help reduce the risk of both gum disease and heart disease.

    Also read | Is eating garlic on empty stomach safe for your health ? Know its benefits and side effects


    Continue Reading