Author: admin

Bajwa, J., Munir, U., Nori, A. & Williams, B. Artificial intelligence in healthcare: transforming the practice of medicine. Future Healthc. J. 8, e188–e194 (2021).

Google Scholar 

Bohr, A. & Memarzadeh, K. The rise of artificial intelligence in healthcare applications. In Artificial Intelligence in Healthcare (eds Bohr, A. & Memarzadeh, K.) 25–60 (Academic Press, 2020).

Moynihan, A. et al. New technologies for future of surgery in Ireland: An RCSI working Group report 2024. Surgeon 23, 120–132 (2025).

Google Scholar 

Sauerbrei, A., Kerasidou, A., Lucivero, F. & Hallowell, N. The impact of artificial intelligence on the person-centred, doctor-patient relationship: some problems and solutions. BMC Med. Inform. Decis. Mak. 23, 73 (2023).

Google Scholar 

Duffourc, M., Møllebæk, M., Druedahl, L. C., Minssen, T. & Gerke, S. Surgeons’ perspectives on liability for the use of artificial intelligence technologies in the United States and European Union: results from a focus group study. Ann. Surg. Open 6, e542 (2025).

Google Scholar 

Park, H. J. Patient perspectives on informed consent for medical AI: a web-based experiment. Digit. Health 10, 20552076241247938 (2024).

Google Scholar 

Iserson, K. V. Informed consent for artificial intelligence in emergency medicine: a practical guide. Am. J. Emerg. Med. 76, 225–230 (2024).

Google Scholar 

Pallocci, M. et al. Informed consent: legal obligation or cornerstone of the care relationship? Int. J. Environ. Res. Public Health 20, 2118 (2023).

Google Scholar 

Ng, I. K. Informed consent in clinical practice: old problems, new challenges. J. R. Coll. Physicians Edinb. 54, 153–158 (2024).

Google Scholar 

Director, S. Does black box AI in medicine compromise informed consent? Philos. Technol. 38, 62 (2025).

Google Scholar 

De Menech, C. Artificial intelligence and self-determination in medical field. Eur. J. Priv. Law Technol. 1, 164–180 (2022).

Google Scholar 

World Health Organization. Ethics and governance of artificial intelligence for health: WHO guidance. https://iris.who.int/handle/10665/341996 (World Health Organization, 2021).

Pruski, M. AI-enhanced healthcare: Not a new paradigm for informed consent. J. Bioethical Inq. 21, 475–489 (2024).

Google Scholar 

Mello, M. M., Char, D. & Xu, S. H. Ethical obligations to inform patients about use of AI tools. JAMA 334, 767–770 (2025).

Google Scholar 

Cahill, R. A., Duffourc, M. & Gerke, S. The AI-enhanced surgeon—integrating black-box artificial intelligence in the operating room. Int. J. Surg. 111, 2823–2826 https://doi.org/10.1097/JS9.0000000000002309 (2025).

Google Scholar 

Oliphant, K. Medical malpractice and compensation: comparative observations. In Medical Malpractice and Compensation in Global Perspective (eds Oliphant, K. & Wright, R.) 513–562 (Walter de Gruyter, 2013).

Borysiak, W. Concept of due care in medical law in a comparative perspective. Eur. J. Health Law 31, 1–26 (2023).

Google Scholar 

Duffourc, M. & Gerke, S. Decoding US Tort Liability in Healthcare’s Black-Box AI Era: lessons from the European Union. Stanf. Tech. L. Rev. 27, 1–70 (2023).

Google Scholar 

Raab, E. L. The parameters of informed consent. Trans. Am. Ophthalmol. Soc. 102, 225–232 (2004).

Google Scholar 

Almekkawy, M. et al. Therapeutic systems and technologies: state-of-the-art applications, opportunities, and challenges. IEEE Rev. Biomed. Eng. 2, 325–339 (2019).

Google Scholar 

Davis V. Nassau Ophthalmic Servs., P.C., 232 A.D.2d 358, 648 N.Y.S.2d 454 (1996).

BGH, judgment of 13-6-2006 – VI ZR 323/04 (OLG Frankfurt a.M.).

Johnson v. Jacobowitz, 65 A.D.3d 610, 884 N.Y.S.2d 158 (2009).

Mills v. Oxford University Hospitals NHS Trust, [2019] EWHC 936 (QB).

Snow v. Royal United Hospitals Bath NHS Foundation Trust, [2023] EWHC 42 (KB).

BGH, judgment of 22-09-1987 – VI ZR 238/86 (Karlsruhe).

Stover v. Association of Thoracic and Cardiovascular Surgeons, 635 A.2d 1047, 431 Pa.Super. 11 (1993).

OLG Cologne, judgment of 21.09.2011 – 5 U 188/10.

Bayley v George Eliot Hospital NHS Trust, [2017] EWHC 3398 (QB).