Author: admin

We often talk about platforms, tools or accommodations when we discuss accessibility in teaching. Yet students’ difficulties often begin much earlier, particularly in digital and blended learning contexts. The crucial moment comes when they encounter a task and decide whether they can, should – or even want to – engage with it. 

Task instructions can be procedural and technical – students are told where to click, what to submit and when it is due. But it’s not explained to them why the task matters, how to approach or engage with it or what support is available if they struggle. This creates an immediate barrier to students’ engagement, motivation and persistence.

In technology-enhanced environments, accessible teaching starts with how learning tasks are framed.

A motivation-informed view of accessibility

Learners engage more deeply when teaching supports three basic needs: feeling a sense of choice (autonomy), competence and connection. When these needs are supported, students are more willing to put in effort, persist through difficulty and reflect on their learning.

In digital learning contexts, these needs are harder to meet because interaction is often asynchronous and students work more independently. So, language used in task instructions is especially powerful. 

Our work has shown that brief need-supportive statements embedded directly into online learning task instructions can lead to students feeling more motivated and more willing to actively monitor and assess their own work. Importantly, these effects did not depend on complex technologies or additional teaching time but on small, intentional changes in wording.

What do need-supportive instructions look like?

Need-supportive instructions go beyond telling students what to do. In practice, they tend to do three things at once. 

First, they clarify purpose by briefly explaining why a task matters or how it connects to future learning, helping students see the task as more than a compliance exercise. 

Second, they support competence by acknowledging that parts of the task might be challenging, emphasising effort and strategy use, and offering simple guidance on how students might begin or recover if they get stuck. 

Third, they signal support and connection by using invitational language, encouraging questions or reflection, and making teacher presence visible even in asynchronous environments.

These elements can be embedded directly into written task descriptions, short introductory videos or announcements within a learning management system.

Why this matters for accessibility

From an accessibility perspective, need-supportive instructions reduce several hidden barriers to learning: 

(1) they lower cognitive barriers by reducing the effort students must spend interpreting expectations, freeing up attention for learning itself

(2) they reduce motivational barriers by making students more willing to start and persist, even when tasks feel demanding; and 

(3) they ease emotional barriers by framing difficulty as a normal part of learning rather than as evidence of inability.

This is particularly important for students who are neurodivergent, studying in a second language or balancing learning with work or caregiving responsibilities. At the same time, these practices also benefit high-achieving students, who might otherwise disengage from challenging tasks because of fear of failure.

Amplify supportive teaching with tech

Intentionally use technology to strengthen need-supportive teaching. For example, incorporate short reflective prompts in online tasks that encourage students to pause and check their understanding. Frame automated feedback as information for improvement rather than judgement. Recorded instructions can model how to approach a task strategically rather than simply explaining submission requirements. 

In these cases, technology does not replace good teaching; it amplifies it by making instructional choices more visible and more consequential.

Accessibility without lowering standards

A common concern is that making teaching more accessible could dilute academic rigour. But evidence suggests the opposite. When students feel supported in understanding expectations and navigating difficulty, they are more likely to engage in effortful learning behaviours such as revising work, reflecting on feedback and persisting with complex tasks. By implementing need-supportive instructions, we’re not making tasks easier but effort more productive.

Small changes, sustainable impact

One of the strengths of need-supportive instruction is its sustainability. It does not require new platforms, additional class time or major curriculum redesign. Instead, it relies on small, deliberate choices in how tasks are introduced. For teachers and educators aiming to make their teaching more accessible, a useful starting question is simple: “Do my task instructions help students understand why this learning task matters, how they can approach it and what they can do when they face difficulty?”

In this sense, accessibility can be built one task at a time.

Norman B. Mendoza is assistant professor in the Department of Curriculum and Instruction at the Education University of Hong Kong.

If you’d like advice and insight from academics and university staff delivered direct to your inbox each week, sign up for the Campus newsletter.