Author: admin

  • Underutilization of Guideline-Directed Medical Therapy in Heart Failure With Reduced Ejection Fraction: A Retrospective Study in Rural Appalachia

    Underutilization of Guideline-Directed Medical Therapy in Heart Failure With Reduced Ejection Fraction: A Retrospective Study in Rural Appalachia


    Continue Reading

  • “Read the box…” Elon Musk raises alarm over contraceptives and birth control pills | World News

    “Read the box…” Elon Musk raises alarm over contraceptives and birth control pills | World News

    Elon Musk has sparked a wave of discussion with a short but cautionary post on X, urging people to “read the box of anything you’re taking.” His comment came in response to a new scientific study on hormonal contraceptives, which suggested potential effects on brain function, emotional regulation, and memory. The research focused on how synthetic hormones may alter activity in areas of the brain linked to decision-making and emotional processing. Musk’s post amplified the study’s findings to a global audience, drawing widespread attention to the broader question of whether the long-term side effects of commonly used medications are fully understood or sufficiently communicated to the public.

    Elon Musk’s warning on birth control pills and the study behind it

    Musk’s post was linked to a Rice University study published in Hormones and Behavior (2025). Researchers found that hormonal contraceptives may alter activity in the ventromedial prefrontal cortex (vmPFC), a brain region tied to emotion regulation, decision-making, and memory. Adolescent girls on contraceptives showed stronger emotional responses but recalled fewer details of negative experiences.The study, led by Beatriz Brandao, revealed that women on birth control processed emotions differently when using strategies such as distancing or reinterpretation. While this pattern may protect against reliving distress, it could also alter memory patterns in unexpected ways. Co-authors Bryan Denny and Stephanie Leal highlighted that reproductive hormones shape fundamental mental health processes, including stress response and resilience, and called for more research into different contraceptive types and menstrual phases.

    How contraceptives may shape emotions and memory

    The Rice team found that women on contraceptives tended to enhance memory for positive experiences when fully immersing themselves in them, suggesting that hormonal influences may support resilience-building. At the same time, differences in handling negative experiences raised questions about long-term behavioral effects.Earlier research supports this concern. A 2018 Frontiers in Psychology study showed that damage to the vmPFC reduces empathy, while a 2013 Psychoneuroendocrinology paper suggested that contraceptive use can influence mate preferences. More recent studies, including a 2023 paper in Brain, Behavior, and Immunity, linked synthetic hormones to heightened stress and inflammation, underscoring the need for deeper investigation.

    From individual health to population-wide effects

    With more than 60 million women in the United States and hundreds of millions globally using hormonal birth control, even small cognitive or emotional shifts could scale into population-wide effects. Some researchers argue that these influences may extend to stress responses, social decision-making, and even political attitudes over time.However, most medical experts caution against alarmism. They emphasize that contraceptives bring significant health benefits, including preventing unintended pregnancies, regulating menstrual cycles, and reducing risks of ovarian and endometrial cancers. For the majority of women, these benefits outweigh the potential risks. What is needed, they argue, is not panic, but better research, clearer communication, and more personalized options for reproductive health.

    Why Musk’s post drew global attention

    Musk’s brief “read the box” post was not a direct attack on contraceptives but a reminder to be informed about any medication. Its timing, however, against the backdrop of new research, pushed the conversation into the spotlight. Supporters saw his words as a call for greater transparency in pharmaceutical science, while critics warned that influential voices risk fueling misconceptions about birth control.The debate highlights a broader challenge: how to balance recognition of contraceptive side effects with the immense social and medical value these drugs provide. Musk’s comment, simple as it was, amplified a conversation that blends science, health, and ethics, one likely to continue as more research emerges.


    Continue Reading

  • What is art for? A brush with… publication reveals artists’ favourite things – The Art Newspaper

    What is art for? A brush with… publication reveals artists’ favourite things – The Art Newspaper

    “What do you have pinned to your studio wall? If you could live with just one work of art, what would it be? Which writers or poets do you return to? What is art for?”—these are among the 12 anchor questions on The Art Newspaper’s popular and informed podcast A brush with…which was co-conceived and launched in 2020 by Ben Luke, a contributing editor at the newspaper.

    Entitled after the final question he asks every guest, the new publication What is art for? (Heni Publishing) comprises 25 of these conversations with artists such as Ragnar Kjartansson, Michael Armitage, Mark Leckey, Julie Mehretu, Cornelia Parker and Doris Salcedo.

    Luke says in the introduction: “When starting A brush with… my desire was to illustrate a long-held conviction: that artists are the best of us. That they are, to use [Italian art historian] Vasari’s term… ‘impressive and marvellous’, not just in their work, but in the way they approach and respond to the world. The interviews in this book are about inspiration, in multiple senses. But I hope, too, that they provide it.” Jeremy Deller, one of the interviewees, sums up why the podcast is a must-listen, saying: “Ben’s got a knack of getting the best out of his subjects.” We asked Ben about the genesis of the publication, who moved him most and the people he’d now like to see in the hot seat.

    The Art Newspaper: How did the A brush with… series come about?

    Ben Luke: It emerged during lockdown. I had always enjoyed interviewing artists for The Week in Art podcast, but felt that there was scope for a longer-form interview, and it coincided with a period in which there was a thirst for new digital content as people were stuck at home or on lonely walks while social distancing. As I describe in the introduction to the book, the initial pitch to the team was pretty much exactly how the podcast turned out: to talk to artists “about their work and working life and then have several stock questions, repeated each week”. The stock questions included some from the existing Q&A called A brush with… in The Art Newspaper, alongside some new ones. And they’ve stayed the same in every episode—now 121 and counting.

    What are some of the most memorable or surprising answers?

    Every single interview provides such moments. I think of Doris Salcedo’s answer to “Who was the first artist whose work you loved?”: I was expecting that Francisco de Goya might come up because, as she put it, “Goya taught me… not to flinch when witnessing horrors of war, the horrors of political violence”. And that’s very present in her work. But I wasn’t expecting her to mention Cézanne in the same breath. And when I asked her if she feels that he, like Goya, had influenced her, she said: “I adore Cézanne’s neutral, contained, strange beauty. And that containment is essential to me. It is very important to my work.” In a different way, Arthur Jafa surprised me by talking about one of my favourite songs, As by Stevie Wonder, and describing it as “fucking apocalyptic”. I’d never considered it in that way before, and I returned to a cultural entity I thought I knew inside out with a completely different perspective, courtesy of Jafa. The book is full of these insights that introduce us to people, places, works, ideas, that I hope might prompt new adventures for the reader or a rethinking of things they thought they knew—as they have for me.

    Which interview made you laugh the most? Did any make you cry?

    Ragnar Kjartansson’s is by far the funniest of the interviews; his joy is totally infectious. There are many moving moments, like when Julie Mehretu is talking about Diego Velázquez’s Juan de Pareja. It is a portrait of the painter who was an enslaved man, working in Velázquez’s studio, and Julie discusses it in relation to the question, “If you could live with just one work of art, what would it be?” She reflects on “how dehumanised somebody becomes in being somebody’s object, in being somebody’s slave”, but goes on to describe the “deep humanity with which he’s painted, in the profound breath that he’s about to take, the expression in his eyes, the touch of his mouth”. She says she “would want to always have that lesson in my life”. And among the most moving is the interview with Phyllida Barlow, which was recorded just a few days before she died—I really felt that tragic loss when re-reading the interview. She is a truly great artist and thinker about art, as I hope that conversation shows.

    An anchor in the book: Diego Velázquez, Las Meninas, 1656

    courtesy Museo del Prado, Madrid

    Can you explain how you have organised the interviews in the book?

    There are 25 interviews from the series and they appear in the book in the order that they were recorded chronologically, beginning with Michael Armitage from 2020 and ending with Arthur Jafa from 2024. It’s not the full conversation from the podcast: we focus on the 12 standard questions that I ask all the artists, and the answers are largely as they are on the podcast, but lightly (yet rigorously) edited. Listeners to the podcast will know that I do an introduction for each episode that is effectively a short essay on the artist’s work, and I’ve embellished and often re-written these texts, which now include quotes from the part of the podcast that isn’t included in the edited Q&A. I’ve also written an introduction and five texts about artists who are the most frequently mentioned through these interviews, which I’ve termed Anchor Artists: Velázquez, Goya, Édouard Manet, Marcel Duchamp and Louise Bourgeois. A key element is the pictures, which are abundant and beautiful reproduced. So, for the first time, images of the artist’s work, and those of the artists and other cultural figures they reference, accompany the interviews.

    Which historical artist would you have most liked to interview and why?

    So many—I am constantly playing this game in my head. I was recently deeply moved again to hear an archive recording of Eva Hesse talking on the Getty’s Radical Women podcast, and it made me think how much I would have loved to talk to her. I find her work relentlessly fascinating. But I am most obsessed with Henri Matisse, so it would have to be him. I’ve just read a letter Matisse wrote to Pierre Bonnard in 1946 in which he sent him some reproductions of Giotto’s Padua frescoes, which had proved so pivotal in a radical shift away from Fauvism in Matisse’s early years, and which he was revisiting. “For me Giotto is the summit of my desires,” he tells Bonnard, “but the road leading to an equivalent, in our age, is too long for one lifetime.” So, had I interviewed him in 1946, that would be his answer to: “Which historical artist do you turn to the most today?”

    Who is your dream interviewee who you still haven’t managed to get on the podcast?

    There are quite a few. David Hammons is one dream, but that will never happen, because he barely ever does interviews. Likewise, Jasper Johns. And then, I would love to talk to Kara Walker, Simone Leigh, Chris Ofili, Bridget Riley and Kerry James Marshall, among others.

    Your final question to each artist is always, ‘What is art for?’—how would you answer that question?

    I agree with so many of the artists’ answers, from Sarah Sze’s simple answer—“sustenance”—to Tacita Dean’s idea that “it makes it possible to do everything else”, and Charline von Heyl’s entirely accurate assessment that “we all would be completely fucked without it”. But because I was looking back to my student days as part of doing the book, I reconnected with a combination of words used in 1891 by Albert Aurier, the French critic, that I used as the quote we had to provide for the catalogue for the degree show at Middlesex University in 1995. Aurier’s point was about decorative versus easel painting, but he talked about art’s ability to use “thoughts, dreams, and ideas” to decorate “the banal walls of human edifices”. Decoration is only one of the things it can do, of course, but I think art is for confronting us with visual and experiential forms that present varying combinations of “thoughts, dreams and ideas” that reflect in myriad ways on our world, and very often make us think differently about it.

    What is Art For? Ben Luke, Heni Publishing, 400pp, £29.99 (hb)

    Michael Armitage, #mydressmychoice (2015)

    © Michael Armitage. Photo © White Cube (George Darrell)

    Continue Reading

  • Interstellar visitor 3I/ATLAS could be the oldest comet we’ve ever seen

    Interstellar visitor 3I/ATLAS could be the oldest comet we’ve ever seen

    Is it a bird? Is it a plane? No, it’s a mysterious interstellar interloper spotted passing through our Solar System.

    The comet, named 3I/ATLAS, was discovered by NASA’s Asteroid Terrestrial-impact Last Alert System (ATLAS) survey telescope.

    Currently 675 million km (420 million miles) away, 3I/ATLAS could be the oldest comet ever seen. 

    Composite showing comet 3I/ATLAS’s movement across the sky, captured by ESO’s Very Large Telescope. Images were captured over the course of 13 minutes on the night of 3 July 2025. Credit: ESO/O. Hainaut

    “Rather than the quiet Wednesday I had planned, I woke up to messages like ‘3I!!!!!!!!!!’,” says Matthew Hopkins, one of the astronomers who discovered the comet.

    Hopkins and the team developed the Ōtautahi–Oxford model to predict the properties of interstellar objects based on their orbits and possible origins.

    Image of interstellar comet 3I/ATLAS captured by the Hubble Space Telescope’s Wide Field Camera on 21 July 2025. Credit: NASA, ESA, D. Jewitt (UCLA); Image Processing: J. DePasquale (STScI)
    Image of interstellar comet 3I/ATLAS captured by the Hubble Space Telescope’s Wide Field Camera on 21 July 2025. Credit: NASA, ESA, D. Jewitt (UCLA); Image Processing: J. DePasquale (STScI)

    How old is 3I/ATLAS?

    Non-interstellar comets, like Halley’s Comet, formed within our Solar System and are no older
    than the Solar System’s 4.5-billion-year lifespan.

    Interstellar visitors, however, are not formed around the Sun and can be much older.

    The team’s modelling suggests 3I/ATLAS is more than seven billion years old – the oldest comet identified to date. 

    “It’s a fantastic opportunity to test our model on something brand new and possibly ancient,” Hopkins continues.

    A series of images showing the movement of comet 3I/ATLAS across the sky. Credit: ATLAS, University of Hawaii, NASA
    A series of images showing the movement of comet 3I/ATLAS across the sky. Credit: ATLAS, University of Hawaii, NASA

    A visitor from deep space

    3I/ATLAS is only the third-known interstellar object to have been observed, following 2I/Borisov in 2019 and ‘Oumuamua in 2017.

    Unlike its predecessors, it is travelling on a much steeper path through the Galaxy, implying it originated in a completely different region of the Milky Way. 

    It’s thought the comet formed in the Milky Way’s ‘thick disc’, a region of ancient stars that contains about 10 per cent of our Galaxy’s stellar mass.

    Interstellar comet 3I/ATLAS as seen by the Gemini North Telescope. Credit: International Gemini Observatory/NOIRLab/NSF/AURA/K. Meech (IfA/U. Hawaii). Image Processing: Jen Miller & Mahdi Zamani (NSF NOIRLab)
    Interstellar comet 3I/ATLAS as seen by the Gemini North Telescope. Credit: International Gemini Observatory/NOIRLab/NSF/AURA/K. Meech (IfA/U. Hawaii). Image Processing: Jen Miller & Mahdi Zamani (NSF NOIRLab)

    If it does originate from around an old star in the thick disc, that implies that the comet should be rich in water-ice.

    “This is an object from a part of the Galaxy we’ve never seen up close before,” says Professor Chris Lintott, who co-authored the study.

    As 3I/ATLAS nears the Sun, its surface will heat up, allowing scientists to observe whether the expulsion of vapour and dust will form a classic glowing tail.

    As well as having implications for how we detect interstellar comets, astronomers also hope 3I/ATLAS will provide clues about the role of interstellar objects in star and planet formation within our Galaxy.

    Diagram showing the orbit of comet 3I/ATLAS. Credit: NASA/JPL-Caltech
    Diagram showing the orbit of comet 3I/ATLAS. Credit: NASA/JPL-Caltech

    Was Earth an interstellar wanderer?

    Words: Chris Lintott

    Five billion years ago or so, another interstellar object passed through our part of the Galaxy.

    This wanderer, perhaps similar to 3I/ATLAS, became trapped in the nebula from which the Sun was forming.

    Within the disc of material around our newly born star, the object began to accrete material, growing quickly into a more substantial body – one that would become the planet Earth.

    Is this true?

    Astronomers Suzanne Pfalzner and Michele Bannister proposed this idea following the arrival of ‘Oumuamua, and the romance of it grabbed me immediately.

    Maybe the arrival of 3I will help us understand whether this idea about our cosmic origins holds up. 

    This article appeared in the September 2025 issue of BBC Sky at Night Magazine

    Continue Reading

  • Fazaia Medical College hosts transformative self-defense workshop to empower women

    Fazaia Medical College hosts transformative self-defense workshop to empower women

    Fazaia Medical College (FMC), Air University, in collaboration with the Pakistan Martial Arts Association (PMAA) and IFMSA-Pakistan, successfully organised a two-day self-defense workshop that earned wide acclaim from students, faculty, and distinguished professionals.

    The event carried more than just training in defensive skills, it sent a strong message of empowerment: women must be equipped with the knowledge, confidence, and courage to safeguard themselves in any circumstance.

    The workshop was held under the patronage of Maj Gen (R) Muhammad Tahir Khadim, HI(M), Principal of Fazaia Medical College, who inaugurated the event with an inspiring address. He hailed the initiative as “a shield of confidence” at a time when women face growing challenges in public spaces. “Every participant who walks out of this hall today will be stronger, braver, and better prepared for life,” he said, emphasizing that mental resilience is just as vital as academic achievement for Pakistan’s youth.

    Brig (R) Prof Muhammad Mazhar Hussain, SI(M), Vice Principal FMC, described the sessions as transformational. “What we saw here was not merely training, it was transformation. The sight of our daughters blocking, disarming, and defending themselves was a moment of pride. Pakistan needs more of these initiatives, and FMC is proud to lead the way,” he remarked.

    The keynote address was delivered by Ms. Qurrat-ul-Ain from the Pakistan Sports Board, who spoke on the theme “Courage is Contagious.” She highlighted how one empowered woman becomes a beacon of hope for many others.

    The technical backbone of the workshop was led by PMAA President and Chief Trainer, Anwar Mohiuddin, supported by Vice President Faiza Rashid and co-instructors Sumaiyya, Sarah Gill, Noor-ul-Huda, and Maheen Sheikh. Unlike conventional martial arts demonstrations, the workshop focused on real-world tactics: knife disarming, pistol defense, pressure-point strikes, and situational awareness.

    “Self-defense is not about aggression, it is about survival and dignity,” Anwar explained. “Every young woman here is learning not just moves, but how to protect her future.” Students from premier institutions including NUST, FAST, NDU, Bahria University, Air University, IIUI, Federal Medical & Dental College, and FMC participated enthusiastically, many experiencing such training for the first time.

    The event was further distinguished by the presence of Ms Aisha Farrukh, Manager Flight Services, and Ms Sonaina Younus, Manager Flight Operations at Serene Air, who attended as special guests. Both expressed admiration for the initiative. Ms Aisha Farrukh praised the trainers’ professionalism and the students’ confidence, adding: “Safety is paramount in aviation, and it must be the same in everyday life. Self-defense should be part of every institution’s curriculum.”  

    She also announced that Serene Air, in collaboration with PMAA, will launch specialized self-defense training for its female crew and office staff in Karachi, Lahore, and Islamabad. Echoing her colleague, Ms Sonaina Younus said: “This initiative is inspiring. These students are not just learning defense, they are learning courage. Such programs must be celebrated and expanded nationwide.”

    The workshop concluded with a grand ceremony where certificates and prizes were distributed by FMC leadership and PMAA trainers. In his closing remarks, Anwar Mohiuddin urged continuity: “This is not the end but the beginning of a movement. Every participant here is now an ambassador of courage. Spread this knowledge to your families and communities, that is how we build a stronger Pakistan.”

    The audience responded with a standing ovation, while Principal Tahir Khadim aptly summed up the spirit of the workshop: “When you empower women, you empower families. When you empower families, you empower nations. The future of Pakistan is not only educated, but courageous.”


    Continue Reading

  • How Europe’s deforestation law could change the global coffee trade

    How Europe’s deforestation law could change the global coffee trade

    If your morning can’t begin without coffee, you’re in good company. The world drinks about 2 billion cups of coffee a day. However, a European Union law might soon affect your favorite coffee beans – and the farmers who grow them.

    Starting in 2026, companies selling coffee on the European Union market will have to prove that their product is “deforestation-free.” That means every bag of beans, every jar of ground coffee and every espresso capsule must trace back to coffee plants on land that hasn’t been cleared of forest since Dec. 31, 2020.

    The new rules, found in what’s known as the EU Deforestation Regulation, are part of a wider effort to ensure European consumption doesn’t drive global deforestation.

    However, on the ground – from the coffee hills of Ethiopia to the plantations of Brazil – the rule change could transform how coffee is grown, traded and sold.

    Why the EU is targeting deforestation

    Deforestation is a major driver of biodiversity loss and accounts for about 10% of global greenhouse gas emissions. And coffee plantations, along with cocoa, soy and palm oil production, which are also covered by the new regulations, are known sources of forest loss in some countries.

    Under the new EU Deforestation Regulation, companies will be required to trace their coffee to its exact origin – down to the farm plot where the beans were grown – and provide geolocation data and documentation of supply chain custody to EU authorities.

    They will also have to show proof, often through satellite imagery, that any open land where coffee is grown was forest-free before the 2020 cutoff date.

    The rules were initially set to go into effect in early 2025 but were pushed back after complaints from many countries. Governments and industry groups in Latin America, Africa and Southeast Asia warned of trade friction for small farms, and the World Trade Organization has received complaints about the regulations.

    Most companies must now comply by Dec. 30, 2025. Small enterprises get until June 30, 2026.

    Potential winners and losers

    The coffee supply chain is complex. Beans are grown by millions of farmers, sold to collectors, then move through processors, exporters, importers and roasters before reaching grocery shelves. Adding the EU rules means more checkpoints, more paperwork and possibly new strategies for sourcing coffee beans.

    Small farms in particular could be vulnerable to losing business when the new rules go into effect. They could lose contracts or market access if they can’t provide the plot-level GPS coordinates and nondeforestation documentation buyers will require. That could prompt buyers to shift toward larger estates or organized co-ops that can provide the documentation.

    If a farm can’t provide precise plot coordinates or pay for mapping services, it could end up being excluded from the world’s largest coffee market.

    Larger coffee growers already using systems that can trace beans back to specific farm plots could gain a competitive edge.

    Global forest area by type and distribution in 2020, according to a U.N. Food and Agriculture Organization assessment.
    FAO

    The new regulations also include stricter oversight for countries considered most likely to allow deforestation, which could slow trade from those regions. As a result, buyers may shift to regions with lower deforestation risk.

    Even outside Europe, big buyers are likely to prioritize beans they can trace to nondeforested plots, potentially dropping small farms that can’t provide plot-level proof. That could reduce availability and raise the price of some coffee types and put farms out of business. In some cases, the EU regulations could reroute undocumented coffee beans into markets such as the U.S.

    Helping small farms succeed

    For small farms, succeeding under the new EU rules will depend on access to technical support and low-cost tools for tracing their crop’s origin. Some countries are developing national systems to track deforestation, and they are pushing the EU to invest more in helping them.

    Those small farms that can comply with the rules, often through co-ops, could become attractive low-risk suppliers for large buyers seeking compliant crops.

    The change could also boost demand for sustainability certifications, such as Rainforest Alliance, 4C Common Code or Fairtrade, which certify only products that don’t contribute to deforestation. But even certified farms will still need to provide precise location data.

    Agroforestry’s potential

    Arabica coffee, the most common variety sold globally, naturally evolved as an understory shrub, performing best in cooler tropical uplands with good drainage and often partial shade. That points to a way farmers can reduce deforestation risk while still growing coffee: agroforestry.

    Two women examine beans on a coffee plant.
    Farmers check on coffee beans at a small agroforestry operation in Kenya. The coffee bushes were planted among trees that provide shade.
    World Agroforestry Centre/Joseph Gachoka via Flickr, CC BY-NC-SA

    Agroforestry involves planting or conserving shade trees in and around coffee plots to maintain the tree canopy.

    In agroforestry systems, shade trees can buffer heat and drought, often reducing evaporation from soil and moderating plants’ water stress. Several field studies show lower evaporative losses and complementary water use between coffee and shade trees. In some contexts, this can lower irrigation needs and reduce fertilizer demand. Practical tools such as World Coffee Research’s Shade Catalog help farmers choose the right tree species for their location and goals.

    Agroforestry is common in Ethiopia, where Arabica originated, and in parts of Central America, thanks to long traditions of growing coffee in shade and specialty demand for the products.

    Under the new EU rules, however, even these farms must prove that no forest was cleared after 2020.

    Why this matters to coffee drinkers

    For European coffee drinkers, the new EU rules promise more sustainable coffee. But they may also mean higher prices if compliance costs are passed down the supply chain to consumers.

    For coffee lovers elsewhere, changes in global trade flows could shift where beans are sold and at what price. As EU buyers bid up beans that can be traced to nondeforested plots, more of those “fully verified” coffees will flow to Europe. U.S. roasters may then face higher prices or tighter supply for traceable lots, while unverified beans are discounted or simply avoided by brands that choose to follow EU standards.

    Continue Reading

  • Building the Australian Cardiovascular disease Data Commons

    Building the Australian Cardiovascular disease Data Commons

    The authors acknowledge the participants, data custodians, and investigators of the Australian Cardiovascular disease Data Commons (ACDC). The ACDC is funded by the Medical Research Future Fund (RFRHPI000110 and MRFCRI000210). The authors are supported by National Health and Medical Research Council of Australia Emerging Leadership and L3 Investigator Grants (2023/GNT2027256 and 2021/GNT2009965).

    Continue Reading

  • Graham Linehan arrested at Heathrow over his X posts

    Graham Linehan arrested at Heathrow over his X posts

    Helen BushbyCulture reporter

    Getty Images Graham Linehan in a white shirt, lookiing serious Getty Images

    Linehan said in an online article his bail condition stipulates he is “not to go on Twitter”

    Father Ted co-creator Graham Linehan has been arrested at Heathrow Airport on suspicion of inciting violence in relation to his posts on X.

    He was arrested after arriving on a flight from the US, and said in an online Substack article that officials then became concerned for his health after taking his blood pressure, and took him to hospital.

    The Metropolitan Police said that a man in his 50s was arrested on 1 September at Heathrow Airport and taken to hospital, adding his condition “is neither life-threatening nor life-changing” , and he was bailed “pending further investigation”.

    Linehan said in an online article on Substack that his bail condition stipulates he is “not to go on Twitter” and that his arrest related to three posts on X from April, on his views about challenging “a trans-identified male” in “a female-only space”.

    Linehan said when he stepped off the aircraft, “five armed officers were waiting” to tell him he was under arrest.

    The Met said: “The arrest was made by officers from the MPS Aviation Unit. It is routine for officers policing airports to carry firearms. These were not drawn or used at any point during the arrest.”

    Continue Reading

  • Sandy beaches harbor a surprising source of methane emissions

    Sandy beaches harbor a surprising source of methane emissions

    We usually see the coast as a natural line of defense. Seagrass beds and mangroves are often praised for pulling carbon from the air. But there’s another story unfolding in the sand.

    New research from Monash University shows that sandy coastlines are not silent climate helpers. They also release methane, a greenhouse gas that warms the planet much faster than carbon dioxide.


    The study points to half of the world’s continental margins. These sandy stretches cover vast areas and have gone mostly unnoticed in climate models. They now appear to be an important, and underestimated, source of emissions.

    Sandy coastlines release methane

    Professor Perran Cook, a biogeochemist in the Department of Chemistry at Monash, is the principal investigator of the study.

    “This new finding not only challenges a fundamental assumption in marine science, but calls into question what we thought we knew about the role of sandy coastline ecosystems in greenhouse gas production,” said Professor Cook.

    In simple terms, the sand isn’t just storing carbon. It is leaking methane, and much of it comes from seaweed and seagrass breaking down. This means the gains we credit to coastal ecosystems may be smaller than once thought.

    Sand microbes producing methane

    The researchers worked in Australia’s Port Phillip Bay and Westernport Bay, and in Denmark’s Avernakø region.

    The team found microbes living in sandy sediments that can survive oxygen and keep producing methane. Until now, scientists believed these methanogens could only work in oxygen-free zones.

    Tests revealed two new strains. These microbes feast on the leftovers of decaying seaweed and seagrass. Instead of dying when oxygen floods their habitat, they bounce back quickly and restart methane production within hours. That recovery is much faster than anything seen in soils or rice fields.

    How the microbes make methane

    The microbes use a pathway called methylotrophic methanogenesis. They prefer compounds like trimethylamine, choline, and dimethyl sulfoniopropionate.

    All of these compounds are released when marine plants break down. Other potential food sources, such as acetate or hydrogen, did little to stimulate methane.

    This discovery shows why sandy sediments matter. They sit under mats of seaweed, soak up plant byproducts, and then feed methane straight into the atmosphere. Waves and currents push oxygen into the sand, but the microbes endure.

    Algal blooms make it worse

    Warmer water leads to more algae. The algae wash onto beaches and rot. As they decay, methane escapes into the air. This cycle keeps feeding itself, creating a feedback loop.

    Professor Cook warned that large blooms add fuel to the problem. “With rising sea temperatures, species invasions and increasing nutrient pollution, we’re seeing more frequent algal blooms and biomass accumulation on beaches.”

    “This could lead to larger and more frequent pulses of methane to the atmosphere, which in turn contributes to rising sea temperatures.”

    Sandy beaches match major methane sources

    The researchers calculated methane flux from sandy sediments. In some cases, emissions were as strong as wetlands, which are already known as major methane sources.

    The average methane flux matched mangroves and salt marshes but beat out seagrass meadows.

    Because these sands lie under shallow, turbulent waters, methane doesn’t linger. It escapes quickly instead of breaking down in deeper layers. This rapid release means sandy coasts may punch above their weight in the global methane budget.

    Persistent methane production

    The team isolated methanogen strains from both Australia and Denmark. Belonging to the genus Methanococcoides, they showed surprising resilience. When hit with oxygen, they paused. Once conditions shifted back, they resumed methane production within an hour.

    Genomic analysis revealed why. The microbes carry antioxidant defenses, including enzymes normally linked to oxygen-using organisms. These tools allow them to handle sudden oxygen bursts and keep working in shifting coastal sands.

    Local and seasonal drivers

    Not every coastline behaves the same. Seasonal growth and decay of different seaweed and seagrass species matter. Warm waters, nutrient levels, and grazing pressure also play roles. Tropical and temperate coasts may follow very different emission patterns.

    Human activity adds another layer. Fertilizer runoff and nutrient pollution drive eutrophication, leading to dense blooms.

    As these blooms wash ashore, they deliver more fuel for methane-producing microbes. Climate change then sharpens the cycle further.

    Sandy coastlines as methane sources

    Study first author and Monash Ph.D. candidate Ning Hall emphasized the path forward. “From here, we need to understand this process in more detail,” Hall said.

    Future work will examine how different species of seaweed and local ocean conditions affect emissions. These insights will help refine climate models and give a clearer picture of how much methane coastal zones release.

    The study changes how we see sandy shores. They store carbon but also release methane. Microbes, decaying plants, and shifting ocean conditions decide how much they give or take.

    By pulling this hidden source into focus, researchers show that coasts can’t be counted only as climate allies. They are active, dynamic players in the greenhouse gas puzzle, and they demand a place in future climate strategies.

    The study is published in the journal Nature Geoscience.

    —–

    Like what you read? Subscribe to our newsletter for engaging articles, exclusive content, and the latest updates. 

    Check us out on EarthSnap, a free app brought to you by Eric Ralls and Earth.com.

    —–

    Continue Reading

  • China’s Victory Day military parade: Who’s attending and why it matters | Military News

    China’s Victory Day military parade: Who’s attending and why it matters | Military News

    China is hosting a major military parade in capital Beijing on Wednesday, marking 80 years since the end of World War II.

    In the country’s largest ever military parade, Chinese President Xi Jinping will welcome world leaders including Russian President Vladimir Putin and North Korean leader Kim Jong Un, presenting China’s military prowess and vision for the future.

    Here is what to expect from the parade, and why it is significant.

    What time does China’s Victory Day parade start?

    The event will begin on Wednesday at 9am (01:00 GMT), according to China’s state-run Xinhua news agency.

    The last time China hosted a victory day military parade was 10 years ago. That was the first time China organised a grand military parade to commemorate the end of the war.

    What could we expect?

    The parade will be a presentation of Chinese military might, comprising a choreographed showcase of advanced military equipment such as drones, hypersonic missiles and fighter jets.

    Hundreds of People’s Liberation Army (PLA) aircraft will be displayed in the parade, according to Chinese military officials.

    State media reported that 80 buglers will be present at the parade, marking the 80 years since the defeat of Imperial Japan in World War II.

    More than 1,000 musicians will be sat in 14 rows, representing each year of China’s resistance since Japan’s invasion of Manchuria in 1931.

    Spectators in Tiananmen Square will be seated on chairs coloured green, red, and gold, which symbolise fertile land, the sacrifices of the people, and peace, respectively, according to China’s state broadcaster, CCTV.

    The “Victory Day” parade will feature 45 troop contingents and is expected to last about 70 minutes as they march past Xi in Beijing’s Tiananmen Square. Xi is also expected to make a speech.

    China scaled up security across Beijing starting in August, when the rehearsals for the parade kicked off.

    Who will be attending?

    The military parade will be attended by 26 foreign leaders, China’s Assistant Foreign Minister Hong Lei said during a news conference on August 28.

    Putin is already in China, having attended the Shanghai Cooperation Organisation summit in Tianjin on Sunday and Monday.

    Other leaders who travelled to China for the SCO summit or related meetings, and will stay for the September 3 parade, include Myanmar military chief Min Aung Hlaing, Iranian President Masoud Pezeshkian, Pakistani Prime Minister Shehbaz Sharif, Mongolian President Khurelsukh Ukhnaa, Uzbek President Shavkat Mirziyoyev and Belarusian President Alexander Lukashenko.

    But others are joining them, too.

    North Korea’s Kim arrived in China early on Tuesday after his armoured train crossed the North Korea-China border, the state-controlled Rodong Sinmun newspaper reported.

    It is the first time a North Korean leader will attend a Chinese military parade in 66 years. The last North Korean leader to attend a military parade in China was North Korea’s founder and Kim’s late grandfather, Kim Il Sung, in 1959.

    Only two European leaders, Slovakian Prime Minister Robert Fico and Serbian President Aleksandar Vucic, are set to attend the event in Beijing.

    While Slovakia is part of the European Union and NATO, Fico has pushed for closer ties with Russia and visited Moscow for talks with Putin in December 2024. Vucic, like Fico, has been critical of sanctions against Russia over its war in Ukraine and has recently visited Moscow.

    Why does China hold a Victory Day parade and what does it commemorate?

    The German invasion of Poland in 1939, which resulted in Britain and France declaring war on Germany, is commonly considered in the Western world as the point when World War II started.

    But Asia had been facing the brunt of Japanese aggression for several years by then.

    After the invasion of Manchuria in 1931, Japanese and Chinese troops – primarily under Chiang Kai-shek’s Kuomintang (KMT) and the Chinese Communist Party (CCP) – engaged in a series of skirmishes. But at the time, the KMT and the CCP were also locked in the first phase of their own civil war for control of China, and Japan made major advances.

    Then, in July 1937, Japanese and Chinese troops clashed outside of Beijing. Within days, this burgeoned into a full-blown conflict – by then, the KMT and CCP had agreed to a united front against the Japanese that would last until the end of the war in 1945.

    The Japanese military began to invade eastern cities, including Nanjing, killing thousands of civilians, destroying villages and raping women. The CCP and KMT continued to resist. Some estimates say that 20 million Chinese people died as a result of the war, a majority of them civilians.

    In 1941, the United States, under Democratic President Franklin D Roosevelt, imposed an oil embargo on Japan. In December 1941, the Japanese army launched a surprise attack on the US Pacific Fleet at Pearl Harbor in Hawaii, causing damage and casualties, and drawing the US into the war.

    In the 1940s, Japan captured other parts of Asian countries as well, including parts of modern-day Indonesia, Malaysia and Myanmar, and parts of present-day India.

    In 1945, the US Air Forces dropped an atomic bomb on the Japanese city of Hiroshima and three days later, on the city of Nagasaki. After this, the Soviet Union also declared war on Japan.

    Japan formally surrendered on September 2.

    The CCP and KMT resumed their civil war, with the communists under the leadership of Mao Zedong, finally emerging victorious in 1949, when Chiang and his remaining KMT troops fled to Taiwan, setting up a parallel government there.

    In 2014, the Chinese government declared September 3, the day after Japan’s surrender, as Victory Day.

    In 2015, the CCP acknowledged the sacrifices made by KMT soldiers during the war, inviting veterans to attend the military march back then. At the time, Taiwan was ruled by the KMT – which, despite their historical tensions, has long sought closer relations with mainland China under the CCP.

    Since 2016, however, Taiwan has been ruled by the Democratic Progressive Party (DPP), which has been assertive about the self-governing territory’s sovereignty. China, which insists that Taiwan must be reunited with the mainland, has been critical of the DPP.

    Against that backdrop, Wednesday’s parade is expected to highlight the CCP’s role in defeating Japan.

    Continue Reading