Category: 3. Business

  • Asian Growth Companies With High Insider Ownership In April 2026

    Asian Growth Companies With High Insider Ownership In April 2026

    As geopolitical tensions ease following a U.S.-Iran ceasefire, Asian markets have shown resilience, with investor sentiment buoyed by optimism in technology and infrastructure sectors. In this environment, growth companies with high insider ownership can be particularly appealing as they often demonstrate strong alignment between management and shareholders, potentially enhancing their ability to navigate market fluctuations effectively.

    Name

    Insider Ownership

    Earnings Growth

    Seojin SystemLtd (KOSDAQ:A178320)

    25.5%

    105.9%

    Phison Electronics (TPEX:8299)

    10.3%

    35.5%

    Modetour Network (KOSDAQ:A080160)

    12.3%

    61.6%

    Meitu (SEHK:1357)

    22.7%

    31.1%

    Laopu Gold (SEHK:6181)

    34.7%

    25.5%

    J&V Energy Technology (TWSE:6869)

    17.9%

    114.3%

    Guangzhou Tinci Materials Technology (SZSE:002709)

    38.4%

    42.5%

    Gold Circuit Electronics (TWSE:2368)

    30.5%

    42.8%

    Fine M-TecLTD (KOSDAQ:A441270)

    15.1%

    98.4%

    Biocytogen Pharmaceuticals (Beijing) (SEHK:2315)

    14.1%

    46.1%

    Click here to see the full list of 541 stocks from our Fast Growing Asian Companies With High Insider Ownership screener.

    We’ll examine a selection from our screener results.

    Simply Wall St Growth Rating: ★★★★★★

    Overview: Deepexi Technology Co., Ltd. offers enterprise-level big-model AI application solutions in China and has a market cap of HK$14.57 billion.

    Operations: The company’s revenue is primarily generated from the sale of FastData and FastAGI solutions, amounting to CN¥414.99 million.

    Insider Ownership: 18.7%

    Revenue Growth Forecast: 46.9% p.a.

    Deepexi Technology has demonstrated substantial revenue growth, with sales reaching CNY 414.99 million in 2025, up from CNY 242.93 million the previous year, driven by its FastAGI enterprise AI solution. Despite a net loss of CNY 934.56 million, this marks an improvement from the prior year’s loss of CNY 1,254.99 million. The company is expected to achieve profitability within three years and shows strong projected revenue growth at 46.9% annually, outpacing market averages significantly.

    SEHK:1384 Ownership Breakdown as at Apr 2026

    Simply Wall St Growth Rating: ★★★★★☆

    Overview: Sunwoda Electronic Co., Ltd specializes in the research, design, development, production, and sale of lithium-ion battery modules both in China and internationally, with a market cap of approximately CN¥52.47 billion.

    Operations: Sunwoda Electronic Co., Ltd focuses on the innovation and commercialization of lithium-ion battery modules across domestic and international markets.

    Insider Ownership: 28.8%

    Revenue Growth Forecast: 22.5% p.a.

    Sunwoda Electronic Ltd. is positioned for robust growth, with earnings expected to increase by 44.56% annually, surpassing the broader Chinese market’s growth rate. Despite trading at a significant discount to its estimated fair value, challenges include legal issues in Korea over patent infringement claims related to lithium-ion battery technology. Revenue is forecasted to grow at 22.5% annually, yet concerns persist regarding low return on equity and unsustainable dividends due to limited free cash flow coverage.

    SZSE:300207 Earnings and Revenue Growth as at Apr 2026
    SZSE:300207 Earnings and Revenue Growth as at Apr 2026

    Simply Wall St Growth Rating: ★★★★☆☆

    Overview: Scientech Corporation focuses on the research, development, production, sale, and maintenance of process equipment for the semiconductor, LCD, LED, and solar power generation industries with a market cap of NT$54.06 billion.

    Operations: Scientech’s revenue is primarily derived from its brokerage segment, contributing NT$6.70 billion, and its manufacturing segment, which adds NT$4.72 billion.

    Insider Ownership: 27.8%

    Revenue Growth Forecast: 12.5% p.a.

    Scientech Corporation’s earnings are forecasted to grow significantly at 34.4% annually, outpacing the Taiwanese market’s growth rate. The company reported a solid financial performance for 2025, with net income rising to TWD 1.11 billion from TWD 926.98 million the previous year, while revenue increased to TWD 11.37 billion from TWD 9.69 billion. However, its share price has been highly volatile recently and revenue growth is expected to lag behind the broader market trend.

    TWSE:3583 Earnings and Revenue Growth as at Apr 2026
    TWSE:3583 Earnings and Revenue Growth as at Apr 2026

    This article by Simply Wall St is general in nature. We provide commentary based on historical data and analyst forecasts only using an unbiased methodology and our articles are not intended to be financial advice. It does not constitute a recommendation to buy or sell any stock, and does not take account of your objectives, or your financial situation. We aim to bring you long-term focused analysis driven by fundamental data. Note that our analysis may not factor in the latest price-sensitive company announcements or qualitative material. Simply Wall St has no position in any stocks mentioned.The analysis only considers stock directly held by insiders. It does not include indirectly owned stock through other vehicles such as corporate and/or trust entities. All forecast revenue and earnings growth rates quoted are in terms of annualised (per annum) growth rates over 1-3 years.

    Companies discussed in this article include SEHK:1384 SZSE:300207 and TWSE:3583.

    Have feedback on this article? Concerned about the content? Get in touch with us directly. Alternatively, email editorial-team@simplywallst.com

    Continue Reading

  • Veradermics (MANE) Reports Q4 Net Loss of $21.8M

    Veradermics (MANE) Reports Q4 Net Loss of $21.8M

    Veradermics, Incorporated (NYSE:MANE) is one of the

    8 Healthcare Stocks Insiders Are Buying. On March 30, 2026, Veradermics, Incorporated (NYSE:MANE) reported a Q4 net loss of $21.8M and ended the year with $141.9M in cash, cash equivalents, and marketable securities. CEO Reid Waldman said 2025 was a “landmark year,” highlighting progress in Phase 3 development of VDPHL01 and the company’s IPO, while noting expectations for two Phase 3 readouts in men, continued progress toward an NDA submission, and advancement of a Phase 3 trial for female pattern hair loss.

    Earlier in March, Cantor Fitzgerald analyst Prakhar Agrawal initiated coverage on Veradermics, Incorporated (NYSE:MANE) with an Overweight rating, noting the company’s focus on dermatology and its use of “validated biology” of minoxidil with optimized pharmacokinetics to improve efficacy and safety.

    Veradermics (MANE) Reports Q4 net loss of $21.8M

    Copyright: nyul / 123RF Stock Photo

    Similarly, Leerink initiated coverage on Veradermics, Incorporated (NYSE:MANE) with an Outperform rating and a $75 price target, highlighting the large market for hair loss treatments and positioning VDPHL01 as a potential best-in-class oral therapy for both men and women, supported by a hybrid marketing strategy combining telehealth and direct access.

    Veradermics, Incorporated (NYSE:MANE) develops therapies for dermatologic and aesthetic conditions.

    While we acknowledge the potential of MANE as an investment, we believe certain AI stocks offer greater upside potential and carry less downside risk. If you’re looking for an extremely undervalued AI stock that also stands to benefit significantly from Trump-era tariffs and the onshoring trend, see our free report on the best short-term AI stock.

    READ NEXT: 33 Stocks That Should Double in 3 Years and Cathie Wood 2026 Portfolio: 10 Best Stocks to Buy. 

    Disclosure: None. Follow Insider Monkey on Google News.

    Continue Reading

  • Collapse of US-Iran talks heightens fears of prolonged energy shock | Oil

    Collapse of US-Iran talks heightens fears of prolonged energy shock | Oil

    The failure of the US and Iran to reach a peace deal after marathon negotiations has put markets on alert for further oil and gas price rises.

    With large numbers of oil tankers remaining stuck in the Gulf, the US vice-president, JD Vance, blamed the collapse of the talks on Tehran’s refusal to abandon its nuclear weapons programme, while Iranian sources hit back at “excessive” demands from Washington.

    Vance, who left Islamabad on Sunday morning after 21 hours of talks with Iranian officials in the Pakistani capital, said his team had been very clear on its red lines as hopes faded of a quick end to the war that began on 28 February with US and Israeli airstrikes on Tehran.

    A weekend market in US crude oil operated by the broker IG indicated that the oil price was going to rise when trading begins on Sunday night, UK time, to about $98 a barrel, from about $96.50 on Friday night before the peace talks in Pakistan.

    Tony Sycamore, market analyst at IG Australia, said: “Unless a sudden U-turn emerges, energy markets are set for a rocky open when regular trading resumes tomorrow morning.”

    Analysts at JPMorgan Chase expect oil prices to stay high in the second quarter, above $100 a barrel, before easing in the second half of the year.

    Oil prices fluctuated wildly last week and fell below $100 a barrel on Wednesday after a two-week ceasefire was announced. They ended the week lower, with Brent crude at $94.26 a barrel, compared with a peak of $119.45 during the war and about $72 a barrel before the conflict began.

    Donald Trump said on Sunday that the lack of a deal meant US ships would blockade the strait of Hormuz, which has been effectively closed by Iran, and whose reopening was part of the truce agreed on Wednesday.

    The Iranian deputy parliament speaker, Haji Babaei, has been quoted by the Mehr news agency as saying that the shipping passage is “completely” under Iranian control, adding that tolls must be paid in the country’s currency, rials.

    In a lengthy post on Truth Social, the US president said the US was going to start “BLOCKADING any and all Ships trying to enter, or leave, the Strait of Hormuz”.

    Donald Trump said the US navy was going to start “destroying the mines the Iranians laid in the straits”, warning that any Iranian who fires at the US or at “peaceful vessels will be blown to hell”.

    Governments have grown concerned at the long-term impact of rising inflation following the jump in oil and gas prices since the start of the war. Central banks have indicated that previous expectations of cuts in interest rates would need to be re-examined, with financial markets pricing in interest rate increases instead. Ireland has suffered social unrest as protesters took to the streets of Dublin last week and throughout the weekend about the rising cost of living.

    Mohamed El-Erian, an adviser to the German insurer Allianz and a former president of Queens’ College, University of Cambridge, said uncertainty would continue to dominate assessments of the financial impact from the war.

    “While both parties stressed that a quick agreement was too much to hope for given the issues involved, neither readily indicated the next step – something the whole world will be focused on, especially as Israel’s attacks on Lebanon continued throughout the weekend,” he said.

    El-Erian added: “Absent a swift resumption of negotiations, the immediate reaction of financial markets when they open for the trading week will be to push oil prices higher and borrowing costs higher.

    “The extent of the sell-off in the stock market, where investors have been consistently more optimistic than in other asset classes, will depend on whether they see a viable path to further diplomacy.

    “For the UK, all this translates into another hit to the cost of living and less flexibility for both fiscal and monetary policy responses.”

    The week had started with Trump’s apocalyptic threat to Iran that “a whole civilisation will die tonight, never to be brought back again” by bombing the country’s power stations and bridges. But he pulled back from the brink on Wednesday after a two-week truce was hastily agreed with Tehran, brokered by Pakistan.

    Global stock markets rebounded after the temporary ceasefire was announced. By the end of the week, the S&P 500, a measure of top US companies, was close to its level before the US-Israeli attacks on Iran began, and flat on the year.

    Saudi Arabia attempted to head off a possible increase in oil prices by announcing that its east-west oil pipeline and other facilities had been restored following attacks by Iran on infrastructure across the Gulf.

    Citing an energy ministry statement, the official Saudi Press Agency reported that the attacks had led to a “loss of approximately 700,000 barrels per day of pumping capacity through the east-west pipeline” and work was under way to restore full production capacity at the kingdom’s Khurais oilfield.

    During the talks in Islamabad, three supertankers fully laden with oil passed through the strait of Hormuz on Saturday, shipping data showed, most likely headed to China. These were the first vessels to exit the Gulf since the ceasefire deal.

    Wei Yao, an economist at Société Générale, said: “Even if the ceasefire frays, the more likely near-term outcome, in our view, is messy non-compliance and low-level retaliation near-term, rather than an immediate return to full-blown escalation. For the global economy, this means lasting disruptions, as oil and LNG [liquefied natural gas] flows would normalise only slowly.”

    The war’s impact on the global economy will dominate the International Monetary Fund and World Bank’s spring meetings in Washington, which start on Monday. The IMF’s managing director, Kristalina Georgieva, has indicated that the fund will present three scenarios this week, all of which predict lower economic growth and higher inflation. The IMF is also expected to highlight the impact on vulnerable economies.

    Continue Reading

  • Global oil shocks less damaging after lessons learned in ’70s

    Global oil shocks less damaging after lessons learned in ’70s

    The world economy is experiencing a disorienting flashback to the 1970s.

    Oil prices are once again surging in the wake of war in the Middle East, driving up the cost of gasoline, diesel and jet fuel and threatening a return to stagflation – the toxic mix of higher prices and slower growth that made economic life so miserable a half century ago.

    But the U.S. and world economies are less vulnerable now than they were when Saudi Arabia and other Middle Eastern petroleum producers withheld oil supplies to punish countries that supported Israel in the 1973 Yom Kippur War.

    In response to that shock — and another triggered six years later by the Iranian revolution — countries embarked on a new course to increase their energy efficiency, reduce their dependence on Middle Eastern oil, stockpile fuel against future threats, and find and develop alternative sources of energy.

    “We have decades of experience now dealing with these kinds of oil shocks,’’ said Amy Myers Jaffe, research professor at New York University’s Center for Global Affairs.

    Of course, the notion that the current Iran energy shock could have been worse is little comfort to frustrated American motorists paying $4 or more for a gallon of gasoline, to European farmers contending with skyrocketing fertilizer prices and to street vendors in India who can’t get enough gas to cook curries and samosas for their customers.

    And the sheer scale is unprecedented. In response to attacks by the United States and Israel that began Feb. 28, Iran effectively shut off the Strait of Hormuz, through which 20 million barrels of oil — or one-fifth of global production — flowed daily.

    Lutz Kilian, director of the Federal Reserve Bank of Dallas’ Center for Energy and the Economy, figures that 5 million daily barrels can either be rerouted from the Persian Gulf to the Red Sea or continue to transit through the Strait of Hormuz. But that still means that roughly 15 million barrels — or 15% — of daily global oil production is missing, ` with just 6% in the 1973 embargo and after Iraq’s invasion of Kuwait in 1990.

    Cushioning the blow

    Changes the U.S. and other countries made over the past five decades have limited the economic fallout from the war. In 1973, oil accounted for almost half — 46% — of world energy supplies. By 2023, oil’s share had fallen to 30%, according to the International Energy Agency.

    The world still uses more oil than ever: Consumption topped 100 million barrels a day last year, up from fewer than 60 million barrels a day in 1973. But a much bigger share of global energy is coming from other sources — such as natural gas, nuclear, solar — compared with five decades ago.

    The U.S., in particular, has weaned itself away from dependence on foreign oil.

    When the ’73 oil shock hit, America’s domestic energy production was in decline and its reliance on oil imports was growing alarmingly. But the rise of fracking — pumping high-pressure water deep underground to extract previously hard-to-get oil or gas from rock — rejuvenated U.S. energy production in the 21st century. By 2019, America had become a net petroleum exporter.

    “The U.S. economy is much better positioned than it was in the 1970s,” when it was “particularly vulnerable to an oil price shock,” said Sam Ori, executive director of the University of Chicago’s Energy Policy Institute.

    In the early ‘70s, for example, the United States got about 20% of its electricity from oil, Ori said. But a law enacted in 1978 prohibited the use of petroleum in power plants. Now the United States gets no electricity from oil — aside from a few generators in, say, the far reaches of Alaska.

    Dimming the lights

    The 1973 oil embargo was a wake-up call, creating shortages that led to long lines at U.S. gasoline stations.

    On Nov. 25, 1973, President Richard Nixon went on television to ask the American people to make sacrifices. To conserve fuel, he urged gasoline stations to shut their pumps from Saturday night through Sunday, hoping to discourage long-distance weekend driving.

    He asked Congress to lower the maximum speed limit to 50 miles an hour (lawmakers settled for 55 miles an hour) and to ban ornamental and most commercial lighting (they balked at that). Nixon himself promised to dim the White House Christmas lights.

    But while those memories may have left a lasting imprint on some, Jaffe of New York University’s Center for Global Affairs says that today, “a repeat of long gasoline lines, fuel rationing, and outright fuel shortages in the U.S seems highly unlikely.”

    Other countries took aggressive action following the 1973 oil embargo as well.

    The United Kingdom, contending with a coal strike as well as the energy crisis, cut the work week to three days to slash electricity consumption. France ordered offices to turn off the lights at night.

    Japan, almost entirely dependent on imported oil, passed a series of “sho-ene’’ laws — combining the Japanese words for “save’’ or “reduce’’ with “energy’’ — mandating energy efficiency in shipping, buildings, machinery, automobiles and homes.

    Japan also encouraged the use of liquefied natural and gas and the rapid growth of nuclear power, an effort set back after a 2011 earthquake and tsunami damaged the Fukushima nuclear plant. Overall, Japan ranks No. 21 in the world in per capita energy consumption, according to International Energy Agency data, as a result of its efficiency drive and widespread use of buses and trains. The United States is No. 9.

    More fuel efficient cars, new oil fields

    The U.S. government began imposing fuel economy standards in 1975. Fuel economy has risen from 13.1 miles per gallon for model year 1975 vehicles to 27.1 mpg in model year 2023, according to the Environmental Protection Agency. The World Bank, in fact, attributes most of the drop in the global economy’s dependence on oil to stricter fuel efficiency requirements for vehicles around the world.

    The ’70s shocks also set off a search for oil outside the Middle East — Prudhoe Bay in Alaska, the North Sea fields off the coasts of the United Kingdom and Norway and Canada’s oil sands deposits.

    As fracking boomed, U.S. oil production shot up from 5 million barrels a day in 2008 to 13.6 million barrels a day last year. Over the same period, U.S. natural gas production has more than doubled.

    Countries also began stockpiling oil and set up the Paris-based International Energy Agency in 1975 to coordinate responses to energy shocks. Last month, the agency’s 32 member countries agreed to release 400 million barrels of oil in an effort to calm the oil market; included were 172 million barrels from the U.S. Strategic Petroleum Reserve, set up in 1975.

    Central banks such as the Federal Reserve also learned lessons. In the ‘70s, they reduced interest rates to protect the economy from the oil shocks. In so doing, they overlooked the threat posed by higher energy costs — and inflation, already elevated, got worse.

    In a Feb. 17 commentary – 11 days before the United States and Israel attacked Iran – the Dallas Fed’s Kilian wrote that the Fed erred in cutting rates to boost the economy when the 1970s oil shocks hit: “What we can learn from the 1970s is that a well-intentioned policy of stimulating the economy by lowering interest rates has the potential of inadvertently reigniting inflation.’’

    Trump undoes efforts to reduce oil dependence

    While much has changed, the University of Chicago’s Ori cautions: “Oil is still king, the No. 1 fuel in the U.S. economy.’’ Cars, planes, trucks and ships get about 90% of their delivered energy from petroleum. “The lifeblood of the economy – the transportation sector —is still overwhelmingly reliant on petroleum fuel, the price of which is set in a global market,’’ Ori said, “and a disruption anywhere affects the price everywhere.’’

    He also notes that President Donald Trump is undoing many of the policies meant to reduce America’s dependence on petroleum and to encourage the use of electric vehicles.

    Trump’s sweeping tax bill last year ended consumer credits of up to $7,500 for EV purchases. He has announced a proposal to weaken U.S. fuel economy standards and repealed fines on automakers that don’t meet those standards.

    “You take all that together, and the fact is, the U.S. is going in the opposite direction of making big changes to further insulate the economy from oil shocks and oil price volatility,’’ Ori said.

    Wiseman and Kageyama write for the Associated Press. Kageyama reported from Tokyo.

    Continue Reading

  • Where Will the S&P 500 Be in 10 Years? Nobel Laureate Robert Shiller Weighs In

    Where Will the S&P 500 Be in 10 Years? Nobel Laureate Robert Shiller Weighs In

    The last 10 years have been an excellent run for the stock market. Despite two bear markets (2020 and 2022) and two nearly bear markets (2018 and 2025), the S&P 500 (^GSPC 0.11%) has produced a total return of 282% over the last decade, a compound annual return of 14.4%. That’s well above the historical average return for the index. The Nasdaq Composite (^IXIC +0.35%) has fared even better, up 394% (17.3% annually), thanks to the strong performance of tech stocks.

    But investors always need to be looking forward. The next 10 years will certainly unfold differently from the last 10 years. And the stock market will likely produce significantly different returns. Nobel Prize-winning economist Robert Shiller thinks that investors should be prepared for what comes after years of exceptionally strong market performance.

    Image source: Getty Images.

    Shiller’s preferred valuation metric is flashing a major warning sign

    The cyclically adjusted price-to-earnings (CAPE) ratio, developed by Shiller as part of his Nobel Prize-winning research, measures the price of an equity (or a group of equities) relative to its average earnings over the last 10 years, adjusted for inflation. The metric smooths out economic cycles and helps produce better long-term return estimates.

    The S&P 500 CAPE ratio topped 40 before the end of last year. That’s a level the index hasn’t seen since the height of the dot-com bubble. The index ended the year at a CAPE ratio of 39.9. After the sell-off in the stock market so far this year, the CAPE ratio now sits around 38. That’s still one of the highest levels it’s reached throughout history.

    There’s an inverse relationship between the CAPE ratio and future long-term returns. The higher the CAPE ratio, the lower the expected future returns. When the S&P 500 CAPE ratio peaked at the end of 1999, the next decade delivered total returns of negative 9% for the S&P 500. That’s what’s known as the lost decade.

    ^SPX Chart

    Data by YCharts.

    Shiller sees a similar story playing out over the next decade. With index returns driven by a handful of stocks tied to the artificial intelligence (AI) story, he expects only a few survivors out of the group over the long run. The rest, as in the dot-com bubble, may see a significant reduction in their market value as the winners emerge. That’s going to weigh significantly on market returns, just as it did in the early 2000s.

    As a result, Shiller’s model expects the S&P 500 to produce total returns averaging just 1.3% over the next decade. Note that this includes dividends. If you look only at nominal returns, Shiller’s model forecasts an annualized return of negative 0.7% over the next 10 years. Based on the S&P 500’s level at the end of 2025, Shiller puts the index level at 6,381 by the end of 2035 — another lost decade.

    How to invest in today’s market

    Shiller still sees opportunities in today’s market. While AI enthusiasm has pushed the valuations of many tech companies to extremes, there are still stocks trading at attractive values. A company that trades at a good value relative to its earnings and reasonable growth expectations is likely to outperform over the long run.

    Investors may consider buying a value stock ETF. Alternatively, they can research individual stocks to determine their fair value and ensure that they buy them with a wide margin of safety, just in case their expectations don’t pan out as well as expected.

    Shiller also sees opportunities in international stocks. He points out that the major European and Japanese stock indexes are trading at much more attractive CAPE ratios. The MSCI Europe index has a CAPE ratio of just 22.3, which led Shiller to forecast average annual total returns of 7.8% for European stocks over the next decade. The MSCI Japan index trades at a higher CAPE, 26.4 as of the end of the year, but it still trades below its 20-year average. As such, Shiller’s model expects it to return 6.2% per year over the next 10 years.

    Investors should also be wary of over-reliance on the CAPE ratio at extreme valuations. As mentioned, the S&P 500 has only traded above a CAPE ratio of 40 once before. That’s a pretty small sample size. The next 10 years are likely to be different from the last 10 years, but they’ll also look different from the “lost decade.” That said, seeking stocks trading below their fair value and avoiding overhyped stocks is a winning strategy in any market.

    Continue Reading

  • Assessing Ziff Davis (ZD) Valuation After Recent Share Price Momentum And Mixed Long Term Returns

    Assessing Ziff Davis (ZD) Valuation After Recent Share Price Momentum And Mixed Long Term Returns

    Find your next quality investment with Simply Wall St’s easy and powerful screener, trusted by over 7 million individual investors worldwide.

    Ziff Davis (ZD) has caught investor attention after a recent move in its share price, with the stock closing at US$43.72 and showing mixed returns over the past week, month and past 3 months.

    See our latest analysis for Ziff Davis.

    The recent pullback in the share price comes after a strong run, with a 30 day share price return of 10.8% and a year to date share price return of 28.6%. The 1 year total shareholder return of 37.7% contrasts with weaker 3 and 5 year total shareholder returns, which suggests that recent momentum is building from a lower long term base.

    If Ziff Davis has you rethinking where growth could come from next, it may be worth widening your search with a focused list of 18 top founder-led companies

    So with Ziff Davis trading around US$43.72, strong recent returns, mixed longer term performance and a modelled intrinsic discount of about 63%, are you looking at a genuine value opportunity or a stock already pricing in future growth?

    The most followed narrative pegs Ziff Davis at a fair value of about $43.43, almost level with the last close at $43.72, which puts the current debate on the underlying assumptions rather than a big valuation gap.

    Ziff Davis is benefiting from the growing demand for digital content, cloud-based solutions, and recurring subscription services, as demonstrated by double-digit organic growth across Health & Wellness, Connectivity, and strong SaaS uptake, which supports sustained revenue and margin expansion from recurring business models.

    Read the complete narrative.

    Curious what kind of revenue mix and margin shift have to hold up for that fair value to make sense? The core narrative leans heavily on recurring sales, fatter margins and a future earnings multiple that looks more reserved than many growth stories. The full breakdown shows exactly how those moving parts are stitched together.

    Result: Fair Value of $43.43 (ABOUT RIGHT)

    Have a read of the narrative in full and understand what’s behind the forecasts.

    However, this hinges on acquisitions continuing to deliver and on digital advertising holding up, while AI driven content aggregation could still pressure traffic and monetization.

    Find out about the key risks to this Ziff Davis narrative.

    Here is where the story gets more complicated. Ziff Davis screens as cheap on future cash flows, with the SWS DCF model pointing to value above the current US$43.72 price, yet the current 34.9x P/E is richer than the industry on 14.4x and a fair ratio of 27.9x. Is the market overpaying for near term earnings while underestimating longer term cash generation?

    Look into how the SWS DCF model arrives at its fair value.

    ZD Discounted Cash Flow as at Apr 2026

    Simply Wall St performs a discounted cash flow (DCF) on every stock in the world every day (check out Ziff Davis for example). We show the entire calculation in full. You can track the result in your watchlist or portfolio and be alerted when this changes, or use our stock screener to discover 58 high quality undervalued stocks. If you save a screener we even alert you when new companies match – so you never miss a potential opportunity.

    With sentiment clearly split between risk and reward, it makes sense to move quickly, put the numbers in context, and stress test the story for yourself by weighing up the 2 key rewards and 2 important warning signs

    If Ziff Davis has sharpened your thinking, do not stop here. Use the Simply Wall St screener to quickly surface fresh, data driven stock ideas.

    This article by Simply Wall St is general in nature. We provide commentary based on historical data and analyst forecasts only using an unbiased methodology and our articles are not intended to be financial advice. It does not constitute a recommendation to buy or sell any stock, and does not take account of your objectives, or your financial situation. We aim to bring you long-term focused analysis driven by fundamental data. Note that our analysis may not factor in the latest price-sensitive company announcements or qualitative material. Simply Wall St has no position in any stocks mentioned.

    Companies discussed in this article include ZD.

    Have feedback on this article? Concerned about the content? Get in touch with us directly. Alternatively, email editorial-team@simplywallst.com

    Continue Reading

  • Oil prices expected to rise as hope fades of end to Iran war – Financial Times

    1. Oil prices expected to rise as hope fades of end to Iran war  Financial Times
    2. Oil traders are seeing something in Iran’s truce that stocks aren’t  thestreet.com
    3. VIDEO: US-Iran Conflict and Ongoing Fuel Crisis  Australian Broadcasting Corporation
    4. Oil prices could race past $150 as ceasefire in ‘difficult phase’  City AM
    5. Pump price rises slow but fuel up for 40th day in a row  Fleet News

    Continue Reading

  • Is Rigetti Computing’s New 2-Qubit Gate Fidelity Record a Reason to Buy the Stock?

    Is Rigetti Computing’s New 2-Qubit Gate Fidelity Record a Reason to Buy the Stock?

    Rigetti Computing (NASDAQ: RGTI) is a popular quantum computing stock pick. It’s a relatively small company, sporting a market cap of less than $5 billion. However, if its quantum technology pans out, it could be a huge winner and easily deliver ten- or 20-fold returns.

    That kind of return on investment is highly attractive to investors, and Rigetti recently announced some information regarding the success of one of its products. But is that enough to buy the stock? Let’s take a look.

    Will AI create the world’s first trillionaire? Our team just released a report on the one little-known company, called an “Indispensable Monopoly” providing the critical technology Nvidia and Intel both need. Continue »

    Image source: Getty Images.

    The biggest issue surrounding quantum computing is not the ability to do it, which has already been proven. It’s the accuracy with which it’s done. The most popular accuracy metric used by quantum computers is 2-qubit gate fidelity, which measures a quantum computer’s accuracy after a calculation passes through two logic gates. The higher the number, the more accurate the computer is.

    Recently, Rigetti announced that its platform achieved 99.9% fidelity, meaning it has about 1 error in every 1,000 operations. While that sounds impressive, there are competitors that have already surpassed that threshold, like IonQ. IonQ achieved 99.99% fidelity back in October 2025. While that extra 0.09% sounds like very little, it’s a huge amount in the quantum world.

    Additionally, Rigetti only achieved that in a small, prototype platform. Its larger systems, like its 108-qubit system, only achieved 99% fidelity. That’s a problem, because it shows that Rigetti’s technology isn’t scaling well.

    Now, Rigetti may be able to right the course and improve its products, but the clock is ticking fast. There are several competitors in the quantum computing realm, like IonQ. But there are also big tech companies like Microsoft and Alphabet that are heavily investing in quantum technology. These two have resources that Rigetti could only dream of, and it will be a tough road ahead for them.

    As a result, I don’t think Rigetti is a great quantum computing investment. I think investors should be focused on companies with differentiating technology or that are leaders in an area, rather than a company that’s just in the mix. Another option is to purchase a quantum computing exchange-traded fund (ETF), which includes a whole host of quantum computing companies that could be the ultimate winners. Regardless of which one you choose, I think there are better investments out there than Rigetti.

    Before you buy stock in Rigetti Computing, consider this:

    The Motley Fool Stock Advisor analyst team just identified what they believe are the 10 best stocks for investors to buy now… and Rigetti Computing wasn’t one of them. The 10 stocks that made the cut could produce monster returns in the coming years.

    Consider when Netflix made this list on December 17, 2004… if you invested $1,000 at the time of our recommendation, you’d have $555,526!* Or when Nvidia made this list on April 15, 2005… if you invested $1,000 at the time of our recommendation, you’d have $1,156,403!*

    Now, it’s worth noting Stock Advisor’s total average return is 968% — a market-crushing outperformance compared to 191% for the S&P 500. Don’t miss the latest top 10 list, available with Stock Advisor, and join an investing community built by individual investors for individual investors.

    See the 10 stocks »

    *Stock Advisor returns as of April 12, 2026.

    Keithen Drury has positions in Alphabet, IonQ, and Microsoft. The Motley Fool has positions in and recommends Alphabet, IonQ, and Microsoft. The Motley Fool has a disclosure policy.

    Is Rigetti Computing’s New 2-Qubit Gate Fidelity Record a Reason to Buy the Stock? was originally published by The Motley Fool

    Continue Reading

  • GSK sees blockbuster potential in targeted cancer therapy after promising early data – Reuters

    1. GSK sees blockbuster potential in targeted cancer therapy after promising early data  Reuters
    2. GSK presents positive data for B7-H4-targeted ADC in gynecological cancers  GSK US
    3. GSK Sees Blockbuster Potential in Targeted Cancer Therapy Mo-rez  Global Banking & Finance Review®
    4. Strong early data prompts GSK to plan five Phase 3 studies for gynecological cancer ADC  Endpoints News
    5. GSK Bets Big On Its B7-H4 ADC With Five Phase III Trials Upcoming  Citeline News & Insights

    Continue Reading

  • Has Agnico Eagle Mines (AEM) Run Too Far After Its 88% One Year Share Price Jump

    Has Agnico Eagle Mines (AEM) Run Too Far After Its 88% One Year Share Price Jump

    Make better investment decisions with Simply Wall St’s easy, visual tools that give you a competitive edge.

    • If you are wondering whether Agnico Eagle Mines at US$218.75 is priced for opportunity or already reflects the story, the starting point is to understand what current investors are paying for.

    • The stock has posted returns of 4.9% over the last 7 days, 5.4% over the last 30 days, 28.3% year to date and 87.8% over the last year. This naturally raises questions about how much of this is already built into the share price.

    • Recent coverage of the company has focused on its position in the precious metals sector and how investor interest in this space relates to Agnico Eagle Mines as a large producer. News flow has also highlighted how gold focused miners are being reassessed by the market, which helps frame these recent price moves.

    • Agnico Eagle Mines currently holds a 2/6 valuation score, reflecting that it screens as undervalued on 2 of 6 checks. The rest of this article will walk through the main valuation methods used to reach that result, and will point you to a more complete way of thinking about value at the end.

    Agnico Eagle Mines scores just 2/6 on our valuation checks. See what other red flags we found in the full valuation breakdown.

    A Discounted Cash Flow, or DCF, model estimates what a business could be worth today by projecting its future cash flows and discounting them back to a single present value figure.

    For Agnico Eagle Mines, the model used is a 2 Stage Free Cash Flow to Equity approach, based on cash flow projections in $. The latest twelve month free cash flow sits at about $4.2b. Analyst inputs and extrapolated estimates suggest annual free cash flows in the range of roughly $5.5b to $6.8b in the coming years, with a projected free cash flow of $5.5b in 2030. Beyond the explicit analyst window, Simply Wall St extrapolates the remaining years in the 10 year projection.

    When all of those projected cash flows are discounted back, the DCF model arrives at an estimated intrinsic value of $182.30 per share, compared with the current share price of $218.75. This implies the stock screens as around 20.0% overvalued on this method.

    Result: OVERVALUED

    Our Discounted Cash Flow (DCF) analysis suggests Agnico Eagle Mines may be overvalued by 20.0%. Discover 58 high quality undervalued stocks or create your own screener to find better value opportunities.

    AEM Discounted Cash Flow as at Apr 2026

    Head to the Valuation section of our Company Report for more details on how we arrive at this Fair Value for Agnico Eagle Mines.

    For a profitable business, the P/E ratio is a useful shorthand for what investors are paying today for each dollar of earnings. It helps you compare how the market is pricing earnings across similar companies without needing complex models.

    What counts as a “normal” or “fair” P/E depends on how the market views a company’s growth prospects and risk. Higher expected growth or lower perceived risk can support a higher P/E, while slower growth or higher risk usually points to a lower multiple.

    Agnico Eagle Mines currently trades on a P/E of 24.56x. That sits above the Metals and Mining industry average P/E of about 22.77x, but below the peer group average of 30.89x. To refine this, Simply Wall St uses a proprietary “Fair Ratio,” which estimates the P/E that might be reasonable given the company’s earnings growth profile, industry, profit margins, market cap and risk factors. This tailored Fair Ratio of 24.84x is often more informative than a simple comparison with peers or the broad industry because it is built around Agnico Eagle Mines own characteristics rather than broad group averages.

    The current P/E of 24.56x is very close to the Fair Ratio of 24.84x, suggesting the shares look about right on this metric.

    Result: ABOUT RIGHT

    NYSE:AEM P/E Ratio as at Apr 2026
    NYSE:AEM P/E Ratio as at Apr 2026

    P/E ratios tell one story, but what if the real opportunity lies elsewhere? Start investing in legacies, not executives. Discover our 18 top founder-led companies.

    Earlier it was mentioned that there is an even better way to understand valuation. This is where Narratives come in, giving you a simple story-driven framework that connects your view of Agnico Eagle Mines to a forecast and then to a fair value you can compare with today’s share price.

    A Narrative on Simply Wall St is your own story for the company, where you spell out what you think is reasonable for future revenue, earnings and margins. The platform then turns that into a financial forecast and an implied fair value rather than leaving those assumptions hidden.

    Because Narratives live inside the Community page used by millions of investors, they are designed to be accessible. You can quickly see how your view of Agnico Eagle Mines compares with others and use the fair value versus current price gap to help decide whether the stock appears attractive, fully priced or expensive for your goals.

    These Narratives also update when new information arrives, such as earnings or company news. For example, if one investor builds a very optimistic Agnico Eagle Mines Narrative around a fair value of US$333 and another uses a more cautious fair value near US$81, both are transparently refreshed as the data behind their stories changes over time.

    For Agnico Eagle Mines, however, we will make it really easy for you with previews of two leading Agnico Eagle Mines Narratives:

    🐂 Agnico Eagle Mines Bull Case

    Fair value in this bullish Narrative: US$221.67 per share.

    Gap to that fair value versus the last close of US$218.75: around 1.3% below the Narrative fair value.

    Assumed annual revenue growth: 12.38%.

    • Analysts in this Narrative see revenue rising alongside higher assumed profit margins and a slightly higher future P/E multiple to support the US$221.67 fair value.

    • They factor in revenue of US$11.0b and earnings of US$3.4b by 2028, with earnings per share of US$6.91 and an assumed P/E of 26.1x on those earnings.

    • The view leans on continued project delivery, reserve expansion and cost efficiency while also flagging gold price sensitivity, project execution and permitting as key risks to monitor.

    🐻 Agnico Eagle Mines Bear Case

    Fair value in this cautious Narrative: US$136.62 per share.

    Gap to that fair value versus the last close of US$218.75: around 37.2% above the Narrative fair value.

    Assumed annual revenue growth: 4.34%.

    • This Narrative leans on more conservative assumptions, including lower revenue growth, margin pressure and a reduced future P/E multiple of 16.25x, to arrive at the US$136.62 fair value.

    • It reflects concerns that a large project pipeline, higher real interest rates and potential softening in gold demand could weigh on revenue, earnings and the scope for capital returns.

    • At the same time, it acknowledges the company’s substantial project depth, balance sheet strength and long mine lives, which could challenge a more cautious fair value if execution and gold pricing prove more supportive than assumed.

    In short, these Narratives frame a reasonable range of outcomes for Agnico Eagle Mines. The key for you is to decide which assumptions around growth, margins and valuation multiples feel closer to your own view of the company and the gold sector.

    See what the community is saying about Agnico Eagle Mines

    Do you think there’s more to the story for Agnico Eagle Mines? Head over to our Community to see what others are saying!

    NYSE:AEM 1-Year Stock Price Chart
    NYSE:AEM 1-Year Stock Price Chart

    This article by Simply Wall St is general in nature. We provide commentary based on historical data and analyst forecasts only using an unbiased methodology and our articles are not intended to be financial advice. It does not constitute a recommendation to buy or sell any stock, and does not take account of your objectives, or your financial situation. We aim to bring you long-term focused analysis driven by fundamental data. Note that our analysis may not factor in the latest price-sensitive company announcements or qualitative material. Simply Wall St has no position in any stocks mentioned.

    Companies discussed in this article include AEM.

    Have feedback on this article? Concerned about the content? Get in touch with us directly. Alternatively, email editorial-team@simplywallst.com

    Continue Reading