Category: 3. Business

  • SAM Engineering & Equipment (M) Berhad’s (KLSE:SAM) 26% CAGR outpaced the company’s earnings growth over the same five-year period

    SAM Engineering & Equipment (M) Berhad’s (KLSE:SAM) 26% CAGR outpaced the company’s earnings growth over the same five-year period

    The most you can lose on any stock (assuming you don’t use leverage) is 100% of your money. But when you pick a company that is really flourishing, you can make more than 100%. For example, the SAM Engineering & Equipment (M) Berhad (KLSE:SAM) share price has soared 203% in the last half decade. Most would be very happy with that. On top of that, the share price is up 16% in about a quarter.

    Since it’s been a strong week for SAM Engineering & Equipment (M) Berhad shareholders, let’s have a look at trend of the longer term fundamentals.

    Trump has pledged to “unleash” American oil and gas and these 15 US stocks have developments that are poised to benefit.

    While the efficient markets hypothesis continues to be taught by some, it has been proven that markets are over-reactive dynamic systems, and investors are not always rational. By comparing earnings per share (EPS) and share price changes over time, we can get a feel for how investor attitudes to a company have morphed over time.

    During five years of share price growth, SAM Engineering & Equipment (M) Berhad achieved compound earnings per share (EPS) growth of 2.6% per year. This EPS growth is lower than the 25% average annual increase in the share price. So it’s fair to assume the market has a higher opinion of the business than it did five years ago. And that’s hardly shocking given the track record of growth.

    The image below shows how EPS has tracked over time (if you click on the image you can see greater detail).

    KLSE:SAM Earnings Per Share Growth November 3rd 2025

    It might be well worthwhile taking a look at our free report on SAM Engineering & Equipment (M) Berhad’s earnings, revenue and cash flow.

    As well as measuring the share price return, investors should also consider the total shareholder return (TSR). The TSR is a return calculation that accounts for the value of cash dividends (assuming that any dividend received was reinvested) and the calculated value of any discounted capital raisings and spin-offs. So for companies that pay a generous dividend, the TSR is often a lot higher than the share price return. In the case of SAM Engineering & Equipment (M) Berhad, it has a TSR of 222% for the last 5 years. That exceeds its share price return that we previously mentioned. And there’s no prize for guessing that the dividend payments largely explain the divergence!

    It’s nice to see that SAM Engineering & Equipment (M) Berhad shareholders have received a total shareholder return of 15% over the last year. That’s including the dividend. However, the TSR over five years, coming in at 26% per year, is even more impressive. The pessimistic view would be that be that the stock has its best days behind it, but on the other hand the price might simply be moderating while the business itself continues to execute. Before deciding if you like the current share price, check how SAM Engineering & Equipment (M) Berhad scores on these 3 valuation metrics.

    But note: SAM Engineering & Equipment (M) Berhad may not be the best stock to buy. So take a peek at this free list of interesting companies with past earnings growth (and further growth forecast).

    Please note, the market returns quoted in this article reflect the market weighted average returns of stocks that currently trade on Malaysian exchanges.

    Have feedback on this article? Concerned about the content? Get in touch with us directly. Alternatively, email editorial-team (at) simplywallst.com.

    This article by Simply Wall St is general in nature. We provide commentary based on historical data and analyst forecasts only using an unbiased methodology and our articles are not intended to be financial advice. It does not constitute a recommendation to buy or sell any stock, and does not take account of your objectives, or your financial situation. We aim to bring you long-term focused analysis driven by fundamental data. Note that our analysis may not factor in the latest price-sensitive company announcements or qualitative material. Simply Wall St has no position in any stocks mentioned.

    Continue Reading

  • Faraday Future Founder and Co-CEO YT Jia Shares Weekly Investor Update: FF Appoints Chris Nixon Cox as Global Strategic Advisor to Accelerate Global Expansion of “EAI + Crypto” Strategy – Faraday Future

    1. Faraday Future Founder and Co-CEO YT Jia Shares Weekly Investor Update: FF Appoints Chris Nixon Cox as Global Strategic Advisor to Accelerate Global Expansion of “EAI + Crypto” Strategy  Faraday Future
    2. Faraday X Announces that its FX Super One Received Non-Binding Non-Refundable Paid B2B Preorders for over 200 Units Within 48 Hours of its Middle East Final Launch Event Held on October 28  Mena FN
    3. Faraday Future receives 200+ vehicle preorders in UAE launch  Investing.com
    4. Faraday Future (NASDAQ: FFAI) opens UAE sales; AIHEREV Max AED 309,000, 200+ B2B preorders  Stock Titan
    5. Faraday Future’s new model receives first down payment in USDT, announces plans to expand cryptocurrency payment options  Bitget

    Continue Reading

  • Week Ahead for FX, Bonds: U.S. ISM Data in Focus; -2-

    Week Ahead for FX, Bonds: U.S. ISM Data in Focus; -2-

    Australia/New Zealand

    The Reserve Bank of Australia will dominate the spotlight on Tuesday with a likely decision to leave interest rates unchanged at 3.60%, while signaling an extended period on the sidelines.

    Third-quarter inflation came in well above expectations, effectively wiping out any near-term prospects for rate cuts. The RBA also faces surging house prices, which argue strongly against easing for now.

    With core inflation back at the top of the RBA's target range, some economists are even speculating that the next move in rates will be upward--but not until 2027.

    The RBA has only cut rates three times in total and raised them less than many of its global peers, so a shallow easing cycle was always likely.

    In New Zealand, third-quarter employment data due Wednesday are expected to show the jobless rate remaining above 5.0%. Despite significant rate cuts over the past year, New Zealand's economy remains weak and employment growth has yet to recover.

    The Reserve Bank of New Zealand has said much of its policy easing has yet to reach households, many of which have fixed mortgage rates. With spare capacity still high, the RBNZ is expected to continue lowering rates over the coming months.

    Asia PMIs

    Monday sees a slew of PMI prints for Asia that will provide fresh signals on how tariff policies have affected manufacturing activity and sentiment in the region.

    The readings, capturing manufacturing trends in South Korea, Japan, Taiwan and other Asian economies, will likely show continued divergence across the region.

    The prior round of purchasing managers surveys indicated an uptick in output at the end of the third quarter, but also weak spots in exports and subdued demand.

    Markets will scrutinize October's data for signs of improving market conditions for Asia's manufacturers. Producers in export powerhouses like Japan and Taiwan have flagged deteriorating demand and sentiment toward the outlook for the months ahead has soured in some parts of the region.

    Despite fears that Asia's exports growth will fade in the second half of the year, figures from recent months do not reflect that, ANZ's research team said, highlighting particularly strong demand for electronic goods.

    Malaysia

    Bank Negara Malaysia is scheduled to announce its November policy decision Thursday afternoon. Given stronger-than-expected third-quarter GDP growth, there is "little reason" for the central bank to cut its policy rate in the near term, Barclays said.

    Looking ahead, GDP growth for 2026 is expected to remain firm at 4.5%, supported by new budget measures aimed at boosting private consumption and investment amid lingering external challenges and ongoing fiscal reforms, UOB economists Julia Goh and Loke Siew Ting said.

    This steady growth outlook should allow Bank Negara to keep the policy rate unchanged at 2.75% throughout the year, they added.

    Indonesia

    Indonesia will release September's trade and October inflation data Monday.

    Export growth likely rebounded due to favorable base effects and strong external demand, Barclays said. Looking ahead, Indonesia's trade ties with the U.S. could continue to weigh on the exports due to higher tariffs, while imports may benefit from reciprocal arrangements, UOB economists Enrico Tanuwidjaja and Vincentius Ming Shen said.

    Citi expects October inflation at 2.81% from 2.65% in September, driven by higher food prices.

    Core inflation likely eased to 2.06% from 2.19% amid moderate demand, ANZ said.

    Bank Indonesia's pro-growth stance suggests the easing cycle isn't over, with ANZ expecting two additional 25-basis-point cuts, bringing the policy rate down to 4.25% by the first quarter of next year.

    Indonesia's statistics bureau will release third-quarter GDP data Wednesday afternoon. Growth likely eased to 5.0% from 5.12% in the prior quarter, ANZ said. Indicators point to weaker consumer confidence, slower car sales, moderated loan growth, softer capital goods imports and budget disbursement delays, it said.

    Net exports likely provided some support, while fourth-quarter stimulus measures worth 46 trillion rupiah, equivalent to 0.2% of GDP, should help boost private consumption, ANZ added.

    South Korea

    South Korea is due to release its October inflation data Tuesday. Headline inflation likely picked up marginally, according to a Wall Street Journal survey.

    The median forecast from a WSJ poll of seven economists calls for a 2.2% on-year rise in the benchmark consumer-price index, following a 2.1% gain in September. On a monthly basis, the index likely edged up 0.1% after September's 0.5% increase.

    Citigroup economist Jin-Wook Kim said inflationary pressure from higher agricultural products during the early-October Chuseok holiday may have eased somewhat, while Shinyoung Securities economist Cho Yong-gu said higher prices for industrial goods and utility likely kept overall inflation elevated.

    Taiwan

    Taiwan reports trade data on Friday, which will show if the island's run of exports growth continued at the start of the fourth quarter.

    Frontloading of shipments to get ahead of U.S. tariffs, plus booming demand for the chips and electronics, have powered Taiwan's exports through the year, lifting the outlook for the broader economy.

    Some economists have expected that momentum to correct somewhat in the second half of the year. DBS's economics team thinks exports growth likely slowed but stayed solid at about 30% on year as the delay in U.S. semiconductor tariffs encouraged frontloading and AI-related demand remained strong.

    The trade data will be preceded by inflation figures for October that will likely show an uptick in price growth.

    Economists at HSBC point out the pullback in September was down to tax cuts, and the timing of the Mid-Autumn festival. The holiday, which fell later this year, will likely push inflation higher in October. A temporary hike in household electricity fees likely also drove up inflation.

    Philippines

    Investors will focus on the Philippines' inflation and GDP data for signs of how policy easing and fiscal spending are filtering through the economy. Rice prices likely rose slightly in October, driving headline inflation higher, Barclays said.

    Third-quarter GDP growth likely slowed sharply due to a significant decline in government spending, ING said, citing corruption scandals associated with flood-control projects.

    Business sentiment also weakened, with tariff uncertainties adding further drag, ING added.

    Thailand

    Thailand will release its October inflation data during the week.

    Consumer prices likely turned more negative, ANZ said, following government measures to cut retail diesel and gasoline prices and lower raw material costs amid favorable weather conditions.

    While prices of some items may have risen, HSBC economists expect price pressures to remain soft, with consumer demand still cooling on the back of high household debt and subdued confidence.

    Any references to days are in local times.

    Write to Jessica Fleetham at jessica.fleetham@wsj.com and Jihye Lee at jihye.lee@wsj.com

    (END) Dow Jones Newswires

    November 02, 2025 19:14 ET (00:14 GMT)

    Copyright (c) 2025 Dow Jones & Company, Inc.

    Continue Reading

  • IPD Group Limited’s (ASX:IPG) top owners are individual investors with 41% stake, while 33% is held by institutions

    IPD Group Limited’s (ASX:IPG) top owners are individual investors with 41% stake, while 33% is held by institutions

    • Significant control over IPD Group by individual investors implies that the general public has more power to influence management and governance-related decisions

    • 51% of the business is held by the top 12 shareholders

    • Insiders own 24% of IPD Group

    This technology could replace computers: discover the 20 stocks are working to make quantum computing a reality.

    If you want to know who really controls IPD Group Limited (ASX:IPG), then you’ll have to look at the makeup of its share registry. We can see that individual investors own the lion’s share in the company with 41% ownership. Put another way, the group faces the maximum upside potential (or downside risk).

    And institutions on the other hand have a 33% ownership in the company. Institutions will often hold stock in bigger companies, and we expect to see insiders owning a noticeable percentage of the smaller ones.

    Let’s take a closer look to see what the different types of shareholders can tell us about IPD Group.

    See our latest analysis for IPD Group

    ASX:IPG Ownership Breakdown November 3rd 2025

    Institutional investors commonly compare their own returns to the returns of a commonly followed index. So they generally do consider buying larger companies that are included in the relevant benchmark index.

    IPD Group already has institutions on the share registry. Indeed, they own a respectable stake in the company. This implies the analysts working for those institutions have looked at the stock and they like it. But just like anyone else, they could be wrong. If multiple institutions change their view on a stock at the same time, you could see the share price drop fast. It’s therefore worth looking at IPD Group’s earnings history below. Of course, the future is what really matters.

    earnings-and-revenue-growth
    ASX:IPG Earnings and Revenue Growth November 3rd 2025

    We note that hedge funds don’t have a meaningful investment in IPD Group. Our data suggests that Mohamed Yoosuff, who is also the company’s Senior Key Executive, holds the most number of shares at 11%. When an insider holds a sizeable amount of a company’s stock, investors consider it as a positive sign because it suggests that insiders are willing to have their wealth tied up in the future of the company. Moelis Australia Asset Management Ltd is the second largest shareholder owning 9.9% of common stock, and Challenger Limited holds about 5.1% of the company stock. Furthermore, CEO Michael Sainsbury is the owner of 1.1% of the company’s shares.

    After doing some more digging, we found that the top 12 have the combined ownership of 51% in the company, suggesting that no single shareholder has significant control over the company.

    Continue Reading

  • Asian Currencies Consolidate Ahead of Key U.S. Economic Data – The Wall Street Journal

    1. Asian Currencies Consolidate Ahead of Key U.S. Economic Data  The Wall Street Journal
    2. Asian currencies weakens against dollar  Business Recorder
    3. Greenback consolidates post Fed move, and Yen slumps after BoJ stands pat  FXStreet
    4. Asia FX sentiment brightens as dollar softens, peso bets most bearish in a year  MSN
    5. Asia FX Unveiled: Decoding BOJ and Fed Signals Amidst Pivotal Global Trade Talks  CryptoRank

    Continue Reading

  • Assessing China’s overseas coal power ban – Centre for Research on Energy and Clean Air

    Assessing China’s overseas coal power ban – Centre for Research on Energy and Clean Air

    More than four years after President Xi Jinping pledged to end China’s financing of overseas coal projects, the annual assessment from the Centre for Research on Energy and Clean Air (CREA) and the People of Asia for Climate Solutions (PACS) finds that while some progress has been made, the rise of privately owned off-grid captive coal projects for industrial needs, particularly in Indonesia and Africa, is a growing concern.

    While many coal plants have been cancelled, others continue to move forward, especially privately funded, off-grid projects for industrial use, revealing that implementation gaps and loopholes persist.

    The assessment analyses five categories — cancelled; pre-permitted; permitted; under construction; operational — and adds a new project category that has emerged this year for idle plants that could return to service at any time without entering a formal permitting process: mothballed. 

    As of July 2025, the total capacity of overseas coal projects in the pipeline has dropped to 31.4 gigawatts (GW), down from nearly 50 GW in 2024. Cancellations have also accelerated, after a slowdown in 2024, with 16.4 GW of new capacity cancelled in 2025. Since the 2021 pledge, a total of 59.3 GW of projects have been cancelled, which is equivalent to 6.1 billion tonnes of avoided lifetime carbon dioxide (CO₂) emissions.

    Despite these positive trends, operational projects have grown by 4.1 GW in 2025. Most of these projects were under construction in 2024 or about to be commissioned, demonstrating that once a plant enters the construction stage, it is unlikely to be cancelled.

    Trends in China-backed overseas coal power: 2021 to 2025 Q3

    Although the pace of construction has slowed in 2025, 12.1 GW of capacity remains under construction across 14 projects. These consist largely of captive coal projects in Indonesia, India, Laos, Zimbabwe, and Zambia. These are off-grid facilities that serve industrial needs and are owned by private Chinese companies. This loophole casts a growing shadow over the progress made in ending China’s overseas coal investments. See report annex for further details in the field studies.

    To-date, China’s overseas captive coal projects have added an estimated 1.5 billion tonnes of lifetime CO₂, which comes to almost half of all emissions currently in operation. The current projects under construction could add a total of around 3.4 billion tonnes of potential lifetime CO₂ emissions upon completion.

    Policy recommendations

    CREA and PACS propose the following policy recommendations to expedite the implementation of President Xi’s 2021 pledge to phase-out China-backed overseas coal projects, including but not limited to:

    • The pledge should explicitly cover captive coal. Approvals and financing should require renewable or hybrid alternatives, best available technology (BAT), environmental standards, and time-bound retirement plans. 
    • The prioritisation of financing redirected towards renewable energy investments: solar, wind, hydro, storage, and grid modernisation. In host countries with pre-permit projects, targeted support for project preparation, land and transmission access, and power market reforms can accelerate renewable pipelines and reduce coal dependence. 
    • Support for host country transition strategies. China and international partners should expand technical and financial assistance for national transition plans,  cooperating with local authorities to help ensure that the shift away from coal also supports economic resilience and local employment.
    • Establishing a dedicated coordinating agency. Since the 2021 pledge, China has yet to designate a body responsible for its enforcement. A dedicated agency with strong coordination and regulatory powers is needed to guide implementation, ensure accountability, and intervene in irresponsible or illegal operations when necessary.

    Continue Reading

  • Gold Falls on Reports of China’s Finance Ministry Ending Tax Incentive for Gold Sales – The Wall Street Journal

    1. Gold Falls on Reports of China’s Finance Ministry Ending Tax Incentive for Gold Sales  The Wall Street Journal
    2. China Ends Gold Tax Break in Setback for Key Bullion Market  Bloomberg.com
    3. China ends tax incentive on gold sales, raising costs for consumers and retailers  Business Today
    4. China Scraps Gold Tax Break for Retailers: Potential Market Ripples  scanx.trade
    5. China ends tax exemption on gold What will happen to prices  المتداول العربي

    Continue Reading

  • Hyundai Motor Group Partners With EDB To Build up Capabilities in Low-Carbon Technologies, Including Hydrogen

    • Hyundai Motor Group signs Memorandum of Understanding with Singapore’s Economic Development Board to identify partnership opportunities in building up capabilities in low-carbon technologies such as hydrogen
    • Collaboration reinforces Hyundai Motor Group’s commitment to advancing hydrogen technologies and supporting Singapore’s efforts to drive low-carbon hydrogen innovation  


    SEOUL, November 2, 2025
     – Hyundai Motor Group (the Group) has signed a Memorandum of Understanding (MoU) with the Economic Development Board (EDB) of Singapore to identify opportunities to develop low-carbon technologies, including hydrogen.

    The initiative builds on the existing partnership between the Group and EDB through the Hyundai Motor Group Innovation Center Singapore (HMGICS), which is Hyundai Motor Group’s first global open innovation hub and testbed.

    Recognizing Singapore’s ambitions set out in the Green Plan 2030, the Group is exploring various potential collaborations with Singapore-based companies and start-ups including the potential use of Singapore’s pipeline network for efficient hydrogen distribution, aiming to address logistical challenges and enhance resource efficiency.

    Through this collaboration, the Group reaffirms its commitment to advancing hydrogen as a clean energy source.

    “We are excited to collaborate with the EDB to explore new growth areas, including the development of low-carbon technologies,” said Jaeha Park, Vice President, Head of Global Hydrogen Business Sub-Division at Hyundai Motor Group. “By bringing our cutting-edge expertise in hydrogen technology, this partnership represents a significant step forward in creating a clean energy future for Singapore. We look forward to driving impactful solutions that demonstrate the potential of hydrogen as a cornerstone of global sustainability.”

    EDB will facilitate HMG’s participation in relevant initiatives to build up and apply low-carbon technologies, including potential collaborations with local enterprises and innovation partners to drive technological advancement.

    “This MoU builds on the strong partnership between EDB and Hyundai Motor Group. The collaboration is closely aligned to Singapore’s commitment to develop a low-carbon economy, by supporting companies on sustainable technology development. This will strengthen Singapore’s position as a global innovation hub within Hyundai Motor Group’s global network,” Zheng Jingxin, Vice President and Head of Mobility at the Singapore Economic Development Board.

    The Group’s mid-to-long-term vision extends globally, as it looks to expand the clean hydrogen ecosystem by integrating eco-friendly energy businesses across neighbouring countries. By focusing on sustainable energy solutions and advanced infrastructure, the Group continues to lead the way in hydrogen energy innovation, setting new benchmarks for global sustainability.

     

    ###

     

    About Hyundai Motor Group
    Hyundai Motor Group is a global enterprise that has created a value chain based on mobility, steel, and construction, as well as logistics, finance, IT, and service. With about 250,000 employees worldwide, the Group’s mobility brands include Hyundai, Kia, and Genesis. Armed with creative thinking, cooperative communication, and the will to take on any challenges, we strive to create a better future for all.

    More information about Hyundai Motor Group can be found at: http://www.hyundaimotorgroup.com or Newsroom: Media Hub by Hyundai, Kia Global Media Center (kianewscenter.com), Genesis Newsroom


    Contact:
    Jihyun Park
    Global PR Strategy & Planning / Hyundai Motor Group
    pjh85@hyundai.com

    Continue Reading

  • Dual abstinence from nicotine vaping and cannabis use among young people: secondary analyses from two U.S.-based randomized controlled trials of vaping cessation | Substance Abuse Treatment, Prevention, and Policy

    Dual abstinence from nicotine vaping and cannabis use among young people: secondary analyses from two U.S.-based randomized controlled trials of vaping cessation | Substance Abuse Treatment, Prevention, and Policy

    Among 1,503 adolescents randomized, the 7-month follow-up rate was 70.8% (n = 1,064). Data on cannabis use was missing for 48 participants, who provided data only on 7-month nicotine vaping status. Thus, the adolescent analytic sample comprised n = 1,016 participants with follow-up data on both e-cigarette and cannabis use. There was no differential attrition by treatment assignment (p = 0.20), with 66.0% (501 of 759) of Intervention participants retained at 7 months versus 69.2% (515 of 744) of Control. Likewise, there was no differential attrition by baseline cannabis use (p = 0.74), with 68.4% (258 of 377) of Exclusive E-cigarette Users retained at 7 months versus 67.3% (758 of 1126) of Dual Users. At baseline, 74.6% (95% CI = 71.8, 77.3) of adolescents reported past 30-day cannabis use, which decreased to 50.1% (47.0, 53.2) at 7 months, a 24.5% point change (95% CI = 20.8, 28.0; McNemar’s test p < 0.001).

    Among 2,588 YAs randomized, the 7-month follow-up rate was 76.0% (n = 1,967). Data on cannabis use was missing for 138 participants, who provided data only on 7-month nicotine vaping status. Thus, the YA analytic sample comprised n = 1,829 participants with follow-up data on both e-cigarette and cannabis use. There was no differential attrition by treatment assignment (p = 0.14), with 69.3% (904 of 1304) of Intervention participants retained at 7 months versus 72.0% (925 of 1284) of Control. Likewise, there was no differential attrition by baseline cannabis use (p = 0.86), with 70.9% (747 of 1053) of Exclusive E-cigarette Users retained at 7 months versus 70.5% (1,082 of 1534) of Dual Users. At baseline, 59.2% (95% CI = 56.9, 61.4) of YAs reported past 30-day cannabis use, which decreased to 55.0% (95% CI = 52.7, 57.3) at 7 months, a 4.2% point change (95% CI = 1.9, 6.4; McNemar’s test p < 0.001).

    What were the overall patterns of abstinence from e-cigarettes and cannabis at 7-months?

    As shown in Table 1, 31.7% (95% CI = 28.8, 34.6) of adolescents were Dual Abstinent, 18.2% (95% CI = 15.9, 20.7) were Exclusive E-cigarette Users, 15.1% (95% CI = 12.9, 17.4) were Exclusive Cannabis Users, and 35.0% (95% CI = 32.1, 38.1) were Dual Users.

    Table 1 Dual use of nicotine e-cigarettes and cannabis at 7 months by treatment assignment and baseline product use among adolescents (13–17 years) enrolled in a randomized trial of vaping cessation, n (%)

    As shown in Table 2, 15.6% (95% CI = 13.9, 17.3) of YAs were Dual Abstinent, 29.4% (95% CI = 27.3, 31.6) were Exclusive E-cigarette Users, 12.8% (95% CI = 11.3, 14.5) were Exclusive Cannabis Users, and 42.2% (95% CI = 39.9, 44.5) were Dual Users.

    Table 2 Dual use of nicotine e-cigarettes and cannabis at 7 months by treatment assignment and baseline product use among young adults (18–24 years) enrolled in a randomized trial of vaping cessation, n (%)

    Was there a treatment effect in promoting dual abstinence at follow-up?

    Yes. As shown in Table 1, among adolescents, the rate of Dual Abstinence was 13.5% points higher (95% CI = 7.8, 19.1; p < 0.0001) among those randomized to Intervention (38.5%; 95% CI = 34.4, 42.9) vs. Control (25.0%; 95% CI = 21.5, 29.0). As shown in Table 2, among YAs, the rate of Dual Abstinence was 4.6% points higher (95% CI = 1.3, 7.9; p = 0.007) among those randomized to Intervention (17.9%; 95% CI = 15.5, 20.6) vs. Control (13.3%; 95% CI = 11.2, 15.7).

    Did treatment effects in promoting dual abstinence vary by baseline product use?

    No. In the adolescent sample, the treatment advantage of Intervention over Control was comparable for Exclusive E-cigarette Users (12.4 points; 95% CI = 0.6, 23.8) and Dual Users (13.9 points; 95% CI = 7.4, 20.3), interaction p = 0.82 (Table 1). Among Exclusive E-cigarette Users, 44.0% of adolescents randomized to Intervention were Dual Abstinent (95% CI = 35.1, 53.1) compared to 31.6% of Control (95% CI = 23.8, 40.2). Among Dual Users, 36.7% of Intervention participants were Dual Abstinent (95% CI = 31.8, 41.8) compared to 22.8% of Control (95% CI = 18.7, 27.3).

    Likewise, in the YA sample, the treatment advantage of Intervention over Control was comparable for Exclusive E-cigarette Users (7.4 points; 95% CI = 1.1, 13.7; p = 0.02) and Dual Users (3.7 points; 95% CI = 0.0, 7.1, p = 0.03), interaction p = 0.28 (Table 2). Among Exclusive E-cigarette Users, 29.7% of YAs randomized to Intervention were Dual Abstinent (95% CI = 25.0, 34.8) compared to 22.3% of Control (95% CI = 18.3, 26.8). Among Dual Users, 10.3% of Intervention participants were Dual Abstinent (95% CI = 7.9, 13.2) compared to 6.6% of Control (95% CI = 4.6, 9.0).

    Was there an interaction effect between vaping status at 7 months and baseline tobacco product use on cannabis use outcomes?

    Among adolescents, the difference in cannabis use at follow-up between continuing vapers and vaping abstainers was significantly weaker among baseline Exclusive E-cigarette Users than among baseline Dual Users (interaction p < 0.001). As shown in Supplemental Table 1, among 258 adolescent baseline Exclusive E-cigarette Users, cannabis use at 7 months was reported by 31.1% (95% CI = 23.4, 39.6) of those who were still nicotine vaping versus 21.1% (95% CI = 14.8, 29.2) of those who were vaping abstinent, a 10% point difference (95% CI = −0.8, 20.3). Among 758 baseline Dual Users, cannabis use at 7 months was reported by 77.3% (95% CI = 72.9, 81.3) of those who were still nicotine vaping versus 36.1% (95% CI = 31.1, 41.3) of those who were vaping abstinent, a 41.3% point difference (95% CI = 34.5, 47.4). In total, 97 out of 258 baseline Exclusive E-cigarette Users were dual abstinent (37.6%) compared to 225 out of 758 baseline Dual Users (29.7%), a significant difference at p = 0.019.

    Among YAs, the difference in cannabis use at follow-up between continuing vapers and vaping abstainers was comparable (interaction p = 0.81) for baseline Exclusive E-cigarette Users and baseline Dual Users. As shown in Supplemental Table 2, among 747 YA baseline Exclusive E-cigarette Users, cannabis use at 7 months was reported by 27.2% (95% CI = 23.4, 31.2) of continuing nicotine vapers versus 16.8% (95% CI = 12.2, 22.3) of vaping abstainers, a 10.4% point difference (95% CI = 3.9, 16.2, p < 0.001). Among 1,082 baseline Dual Users, cannabis use at 7 months was reported by 79.5% (95% CI = 76.5, 82.2) of continuing nicotine vapers versus 68.1% (95% CI = 62.3, 73.4) of vaping abstainers, an 11.4% point difference (95% CI = 5.5, 17.6). In total, 193 out of 747 baseline Exclusive E-cigarette Users were dual abstinent (25.8%) compared to 92 out of 1082 baseline Dual Users (8.5%), a significant difference at p < 0.001.

    Continue Reading

  • Feed One Ltd. (TSE:2060) Margin Decline Challenges Reputation for Reliable Growth

    Feed One Ltd. (TSE:2060) Margin Decline Challenges Reputation for Reliable Growth

    Feed One Ltd. (TSE:2060) reported net profit margins of 1.8%, down slightly from last year’s 2%, signaling some margin pressure despite a strong multi-year record. Over the past five years, the company showed robust 8.5% annual earnings growth, though the most recent period brought a decline in earnings growth compared to that trend. With shares trading at ¥1,018 and a price-to-earnings ratio of 7.5x, well below both peer and industry averages, the company stands out as attractively valued, even as near-term headwinds remain in focus.

    See our full analysis for Feed OneLtd.

    Next, we’ll see how these fresh results compare to the prevailing narratives. We will explore whether the new numbers reinforce the story or challenge long-held views.

    Curious how numbers become stories that shape markets? Explore Community Narratives

    TSE:2060 Earnings & Revenue History as at Nov 2025
    • Feed One Ltd. has delivered an 8.5% average annual earnings growth rate over the last five years, but the latest period saw earnings trend negative, marking a break from this consistent run.

    • As the prevailing market view emphasizes, the company’s long-term steady performance is a draw for conservative investors. However, the slip into negative growth challenges assumptions of immunity to margin or sector pressures.

      • The market acknowledges this high-quality growth track record, indicating operational reliability even as recent contractions raise questions about future resilience.

      • With little excitement from the broader market, valuation optimism relies on the assumption that this downturn is temporary rather than structural.

    • Risks data highlight concern over the sustainability of Feed One Ltd.’s dividend, which is currently not well supported by profits. This stands out as a key vulnerability despite its reputation for stability.

    • According to the prevailing market view, the company’s image as a “safe haven” is tested since unreliable dividends can undermine investor trust in defensive stocks like this one.

      • This reveals tension between the appeal of sector stability and the practical risk that dividend payouts could be cut if profitability challenges persist.

      • Without a turnaround in earnings or cash generation, the main selling point for yield-focused investors may erode, making total return less attractive.

    • Shares trade at ¥1,018, a steep discount to the DCF fair value estimate of ¥3,878.45 and peers’ 29.1x P/E, highlighting the market’s skepticism despite Feed One Ltd.’s much lower 7.5x multiple.

    • The prevailing market view holds that such an undervaluation could be a launchpad for future upside. Yet the lack of clear earnings momentum or sector catalysts suggests the discount may persist until concrete positive developments emerge.

      • While a premium could develop if Feed One Ltd. initiates strategic moves or sector conditions improve, at present, the valuation gap mainly compensates investors for ongoing margin and dividend risks.

      • This makes the stock a classic value play, but patience may be required as near-term sentiment remains cautious absent new catalysts.

    Continue Reading