Blog

These innovators, selected from more than 660 applicants across 54 countries and regions, are competing for a share of RMB200 million (approximately US$28 million) in catalytic funding. Winners will also receive technical resources, expert mentorship, and opportunities to pilot their solutions in real-world environments, including in climate vulnerable regions such as Kenya, the Maldives, and Serbia.

Bridging the “Valley of Death” in Climate Innovation 

The path from breakthrough discovery to real-world impact is often blocked by what experts call the ‘Valley of Death’ – the critical gap between early-stage innovation and large-scale deployment. Many climate technologies fail to progress due to limited funding, partnerships, and testing environments.

The CarbonX Program was created to close this gap. It does this by building a global ecosystem where scientists, engineers, entrepreneurs, investors, and industry leaders work together to accelerate the scaling of climate solutions, offering comprehensive support beyond mere financing.

“The climate crisis is the defining challenge of our time and tackling it demands both bold innovation and collective action across the global ecosystem,” said Davis Lin, Senior Vice President of Tencent. “With CarbonX, we are not only investing in groundbreaking ideas, but also creating the pathways to turn them into real-world solutions. By bridging the gap between research and deployment, we aim to accelerate technologies that can store, transform, and reduce CO₂ emissions at scale, laying the foundation for a truly low-carbon future.” 

Scaling Climate Innovation Across Borders

Building on the success of its inaugural program focused on China, CarbonX 2.0 has expanded globally to identify and support promising early-stage climate technologies. The 50 finalists represent a diverse mix of universities, research institutes, and startups working at the forefront of four key areas:

1. Carbon Dioxide Removal (CDR): Supporting pilots in Kenya to accelerate scalable, cost-effective solutions for permanently removing historic CO₂ emissions, with the potential to reduce direct air capture (DAC) costs substantially.

2. Industrial Decarbonization (CCUS for Steel): Advancing breakthrough approaches to reduce lifecycle emissions in steel production with pilots in Serbia. The focus is on developing cost-effective and scalable industrial carbon capture, utilization, and storage (CCUS) solutions for hard-to-abate industries.

3. Carbon Capture and Utilization (CarbonXmade): Transforming captured carbon into chemicals, and ultimately into consumer products. This creates a circular value chain that turns waste into consumer goods, with early market adoption supported by brand premiums in China.

4. Long-Duration Energy Storage (LDES): Providing real-world scenarios in the Maldives to refine and validate emerging technologies, to meet the growing demands of renewable energy expansion – with flow batteries showing strong promise for commercially viable, long-duration storage.

In early 2026, a global panel of multi-disciplinary experts will evaluate and select the winning teams to receive grants and other resources to pilot their technologies in those regions and create measurable impact.

CarbonX Summit 2025: Inspiring Collective Action

The announcement was made at the CarbonX Summit 2025 in Shenzhen, a convening of finalist teams and leaders from business, academia, and policy to explore how innovation ecosystems can accelerate climate action globally. The Summit spotlighted the role of catalytic finance, inclusive deployment, and multilateral collaboration in achieving the Paris Agreement targets. 

“Sustainability can only be achieved through innovation,” said Hao Xu, Head of Climate Innovation at Tencent. “By supporting the world’s brightest climate entrepreneurs, we aim to harness technology as a force for good — addressing one of humanity’s most urgent challenges while creating shared value for future generations.” 

For more information about CarbonX 2.0, please visit the program website.

Appendix: List of Top 50 Finalists of CarbonX Program 2.0

Anomaly detection use case will be demonstrated live with partner Q-KON at AfricaCom 2025

Herndon, VA, 28 October 2025 – ST Engineering iDirect, a global leader in satellite communications, today announced its AI-powered network analytics platform proof of concept that enables operators to anticipate and resolve network issues before they escalate. This underscores how real-time insights, predictive analytics, and anomaly detection are reshaping satellite network operations. 

ST Engineering iDirect’s platform leverages both historical and real-time data—such as weather patterns—to predict throughput, identify anomalies, and drive proactive interventions. By minimizing downtime and maximizing network reliability, it empowers operators to meet customers’ expectations and deliver exceptional service by ensuring uninterrupted connectivity. The platform will help operators cut operating expenses, streamline resource management, and transition from manual to autonomous workflows, driving greater customer satisfaction and operational efficiency.

“Our strategy goes beyond connectivity. We’re developing value-added applications that help our customers run smarter, more resilient operations and create a true competitive edge,” said Sridhar Kuppanna, CTO and SVP of Engineering at ST Engineering iDirect. “By enabling operators to resolve issues early, optimize resources, and boost workforce efficiency, our network analytics platform advances both business outcomes and customer satisfaction.”

The platform was recently validated in a real-world use case. Q-KON, a leading provider of satellite communication solutions in Africa, utilized ST Engineering iDirect’s platform to detect anomalies affecting network performance. The early identification of a recent installation error allowed Q-KON to take corrective action and avoid service degradation, directly improving customer experience and operational performance.

“The insights gained from ST Engineering iDirect’s network analytics platform will be transformative,” said Dr. Dawie De Wet, CEO of Q-KON. “The ability to predict and prevent issues before they impact service will raise our operational standards, ensure reliable connectivity for our customers and enable us to offer advanced service packages.”

Live demonstrations of the platform will be hosted at Stand C63 during AfricaCom 2025, Nov 10-13, 2026. Register today.

*****

Media contact:
Martyn Gettings Tank PR
Email: martyn.gettings@tank.co.uk

Unlock the Editor’s Digest for free

Roula Khalaf, Editor of the FT, selects her favourite stories in this weekly newsletter.

Hedge funds have adopted a new tactic in the distressed debt wars, arguing in a New York lawsuit filed on Tuesday that heavy-handed deals violate US anti-monopoly and cartel laws.

Manulife’s CQS, Algebris Funds and Deltroit Asset Management claim they were cut out of a deal that handed a group of other similarly situated bondholders disproportionate economic benefits in a debt restructuring earlier this year.

The lawsuit, which relates to the recent restructuring of Swiss vending machine operator Selecta, represents the first time that competition law has been invoked as an alleged charge of wrongdoing in the increasingly fractious realm of distressed debt litigation.

The claimants allege that a so-called co-operation agreement struck between the majority bondholders — a group that included Invesco, Man Group, Strategic Value Partners and Diameter — was specifically designed to keep the bulk economic benefits of a bond exchange from those not invited to join.

According to the complaint, the bonds currently held by the majority group trade at more than 70 cents on the dollar while the minority group has paper trading at half that level.

“The co-operation agreement is a classic example of an anti-competitive and collusive agreement between competitors . . . to control the price for Selecta Group BV’s first lien debt”, the complaint said. It alleged the agreement violated the federal Sherman Act and the New York state Donnelly Act.

So-called non pro-rata debt restructurings, where lenders or bondholders holding equally-ranked paper get different payouts, have proliferated in the US over the past decade. But only in recent years have European companies attempted such manoeuvres.

The Selecta deal drew attention this year among analysts and investors for what was believed to be one of the most complex and aggressive bond exchanges in recent memory.

Selecta, which was previously owned by KKR, had sought a solution to upcoming maturities in a near €1.5 debt stack it could not pay off.

The majority bondholder group used Dutch law on distressed disposals to take control of Selecta, and then offered a coercive bond exchange to the smaller holders.

That offer presented the smaller holders with a choice to either keep their existing paper, but pushed to the bottom of the creditor hierarchy, or take new senior paper which gave the majority group the ability to strip covenants and other protections ahead of potential future transactions through which the majority group could extract even more benefits.

Litigation over non-pro rata debt exchanges has typically centred on contract or securities law, which generally requires unanimous or supermajority approval within a class of creditors to change debt terms or execute a refinancing transaction.

Theories about how competition law may apply in intra-class disputes have surfaced in recent debates between academics and advisers.

However, those had focused on circumstances where a debtor company declared that a creditor co-operation agreement was anti-competitive, not a dispute between creditors as with Selecta.

The plaintiffs, who have separately alleged the restructuring violated contractual provisions of the bond indenture that required 90 per cent support for the deal, are requesting damages.

Samir Parikh, a law professor at Wake Forest University in North Carolina, expressed scepticism about the chances of success of the minority bondholder’s claims, but said that such a lawsuit was predictable.

“Parties resorting to antitrust law is unsurprising given the strong desire to undermine co-operation agreements and the relative ineffectiveness of other levers that have been pulled to date.”