- Chinese shares close higher Wednesday Xinhua
- Shanghai stock benchmark edges higher, set for longest winning streak since July Business Recorder
- Update: Chinese shares close higher Wednesday Xinhua
- China Stocks Rally for 5th Session TradingView — Track All Markets
- Shanghai Composite Rises 0.69% as Dongguan Dingtong Soars 20% Amid Strong Market Gains Markets Mojo
Category: 3. Business
-
Chinese shares close higher Wednesday – Xinhua
-

Powerball’s $1.7B jackpot could make Christmas Eve unforgettable : NPR
A convenience store employee grabs a Powerball lottery ticket for a customer on Monday, Dec. 22, 2025, in Portland, Ore.
Jenny Kane/AP
hide captiontoggle caption
Jenny Kane/AP
A Christmas Eve Powerball drawing could add new meaning to holiday cheer as millions of players hope to cash in on the $1.7 billion prize, which comes after months without a jackpot winner.
The United States’ 4th-largest jackpot on record comes after 46 consecutive draws without someone claiming to have all six numbers. The last contest with a jackpot winner was on Sept. 6. The game’s long odds have people decking the halls and doling out $2 — and sometimes more — for tickets ahead of Wednesday night’s live drawing.
It’s a sign the game is operating as intended. Lottery officials made the odds tougher in 2015 as a mechanism for snowballing jackpots, all the while making it easier to win smaller prizes.
The Christmas holiday is not expected to impact the drawing process should there be a winning ticket, a Powerball spokesperson said.
Here is what to know about Wednesday’s drawing:
Christmas Eve cha-ching
That ticket placed in a stocking or under the tree could be worth a billion bucks — but with some caveats.
Powerball is played in 45 states, along with Washington, D.C., Puerto Rico and the U.S. Virgin Islands. Most of those areas require players to be 18 or older, though some states have steeper requirements. In Nebraska, players have to be at least 19 years old, and in Louisiana and Arizona, people can’t buy tickets until they are 21.
Winning tickets also must be cashed in the states where they were bought. And players can’t buy tickets in Alabama, Alaska, Hawaii, Nevada or Utah.
Other than that, lottery officials argue there is a chance a lucky Powerball ticket could be a gift that keeps on giving.
Charlie McIntyre, the New Hampshire Lottery’s executive director, said Tuesday: “Just think of the stories you can tell for generations to come about the year you woke up a billionaire on Christmas.”
A range of prizes can be presents
Wednesday’s $1.7 billion jackpot has a cash value of $781.3 million.
A winner can choose to be paid the whole amount through an annuity, with an immediate payment and then annual payments over 29 years that increase by 5% each time. Most winners, however, usually choose the cash value for a lump sum.
The odds are high for the top prize, but there are smaller prizes players can reap.
At the last drawing, players in Florida, Georgia, Illinois, New York, Ohio, Pennsylvania, Tennessee and Wisconsin each won $1 million. There are also prizes outside the jackpot, ranging from a few dollars to $2 million.
One woman told Powerball officials that she already made plans for her $1 million win: “We’re going to pay off our cars and credit cards and get a bigger house!”
And Thomas Anderson of Burlington, North Carolina, said he intended to use his $100,000 Powerball win from earlier this month to go back to school, according to Powerball.
Long odds for the billion-dollar jackpots
Lottery officials set the odds at 1 in 292.2 million in hopes that jackpots will roll over with each of the three weekly drawings until the pool balloons so much that more people take notice and play.
The odds used to be notably better, at 1 in 175 million. But the game was made tougher in 2015 to create the out-of-this-world bounties. The tougher odds partly helped set the stage for back-to-back record-breaking sweepstakes this year.
The last time someone won the Powerball pot was on Sept. 6, when players in Missouri and Texas won $1.787 billion, which was the second-highest top prize in U.S. history.
The U.S. has seen more than a dozen lottery jackpot prizes exceed $1 billion since 2016. The biggest U.S. jackpot ever was $2.04 billion back in 2022.
More about those unfavorable odds
It’s hard to explain what odds of 1 in 292.2 million mean. Even if halved, they remain difficult to digest.
In the past, one math professor described the odds of flipping a coin and getting heads 28 straight times.
Tim Chartier, a Davidson College math professor in North Carolina, on Monday compared the odds of a winning lottery ticket to selecting one marked dollar bill from a stack 19 miles (31 kilometers) high.
“It’s true that if you buy 100 tickets, you are 100 times more likely to win. But in this case, ‘100 times more likely’ barely moves the probability needle,” Chartier said. “Using the time analogy, buying 100 tickets is like getting 100 guesses to name that one chosen second over nine years. Possible — but wildly improbable.”
Continue Reading
-

US stocks drift to more records on a holiday-shortened day of trading
NEW YORK — Wall Street closed higher and reached more records Wednesday on a holiday-shortened trading day.
The S&P 500 index rose 22.26 points, or 0.3%, to 6,932.05. The Dow Jones Industrial Average added 288.75, or 0.6%, to close at 48,731.16, and the Nasdaq composite added 51.46, or 0.2%, to 23,613.31
Trading was extremely light as markets closed early for Christmas Eve and will be closed for Christmas Thursday. Roughly 1.8 billion shares traded on the New York Stock Exchange on Wednesday, which is roughly a third of the average trading day.
Markets will reopen for a full day of trading on Friday; however volumes are expected to remain light this week with most investors having closed out their positions for the year.
The S&P 500 is up more than 17% this year, as investors have embraced the deregulatory policies of the Trump administration and been optimistic about the future of artificial intelligence in helping boost profits for not only technology companies but also for Corporate America. Some of the strongest performers this year include Nvidia and Micron Technologies, both companies that make chips or other components that power the proliferation of data centers across the country.
Much of the focus for investors for the next few weeks will be on where the U.S. economy is heading and where the Federal Reserve will move interest rates. Investors are betting the Fed will hold steady on interest rates at its January meeting.
The U.S. economy grew at a surprisingly strong 4.3% annual rate in the third quarter, the most rapid expansion in two years, driven by consumers who continue to spend in the face of ongoing inflation. There have also been recent reports showing shaky confidence among consumers worried about high prices. The labor market has been slowing and retail sales have weakened.
The number of Americans applying for unemployment benefits fell last week and remain at historically healthy levels despite some signs that the labor market is weakening.
U.S. applications for jobless claims for the week ending Dec. 20 fell by 10,000 to 214,000 from the previous week’s 224,000, the Labor Department reported Wednesday. That’s below the 232,000 new applications forecast of analysts surveyed by the data firm FactSet.
Dynavax Technologies soared 38.2% after Sanofi said it was acquiring the California-based vaccine maker in a deal worth $2.2 billion. The French drugmaker will add Dynavax’s hepatitis B vaccines to its portfolio, as well as a shingles vaccine that is still in development.
Novo Nordisk’s shares rose 1.8% after the weight-loss drug company got approval from U.S. regulators for a pill version of its blockbuster drug Wegovy. However, Novo Nordisk shares are still down almost 40% this year as the company has faced increased competition for weight-loss medications, particularly from Eli Lilly. Shares of Eli Lilly are up 40% this year.
European markets moved between slight gains and losses. Asian markets were also quiet, with Hong Kong moving up 0.2% while Japan’s Nikkei 225 fell 0.1%
Gold prices were flat at $4,502 an ounce, and silver rose 0.8% to $71.69. U.S. crude oil was flat at $58.38 a barrel.
Continue Reading
-

Stonepeak to Acquire Majority Controlling Interest in Castrol from bp
$10.1 billion transaction to support Castrol’s next phase of growth
LONDON & NEW YORK – December 24, 2025 – Stonepeak, a leading alternative investment firm specializing in infrastructure and real assets, today announced an agreement to acquire a majority controlling interest in Castrol (or “the Company”), a global leader in lubricants, from BP p.l.c. (“bp”) (NYSE: BP) (LON: BP), in a transaction valuing the business at an enterprise value of approximately $10.1 billion. bp will retain a 35% minority interest in Castrol as part of the transaction. In connection with the transaction, Canada Pension Plan Investment Board (“CPP Investments”) will invest up to USD$1.05 billion in support of the transaction, resulting in an indirect stake in Castrol.
Castrol is one of the largest lubricants providers globally and serves consumer automotive customers, as well as commercial and industrial end markets. As an embedded part of the large and diversified global finished lubricants market, Castrol works closely with its customers and consumers to develop and supply highly engineered lubricants for specific applications. The Company manufactures and markets engine oils, industrial fluids, and greases through approximately 20 blending plants and more than 100 third-party facilities and warehouses worldwide across 150 countries. Applications have included servicing the first jet airline, the Concorde, space missions for over 60 years, and many professional auto and bike racing teams, establishing Castrol’s historic and trusted brand identity. The Company’s products are recognized globally for their high performance, premium quality, and use of cutting-edge technology, and are supported by a global workforce of thousands of skilled professionals.
“Lubricants are a mission-critical product, which are essential to the safe and efficient functioning of virtually every vehicle, machine, and industrial process in the world,” said Anthony Borreca, Senior Managing Director and Co-Head of Energy at Stonepeak. “Castrol’s 126-year heritage has created a leading market position, an iconic brand, and a portfolio of differentiated products that deliver meaningful value to its customers. We are excited to work alongside Castrol’s talented employees, coupled with bp’s continued guidance as a minority interest holder, as we support the business’s continued growth.”
“We are thrilled to have Stonepeak join us as a partner in Castrol. Stonepeak’s capital support, energy sector expertise, and experience working with similar companies that provide essential services will be immensely additive in helping the business to innovate and grow,” said Michelle Jou, Global CEO of Castrol. “This transaction reflects our commitment to investing in the future and creating new opportunities for growth and success at Castrol, and we are proud that Stonepeak shares in our vision for the business as we take the next step in our journey.”
Commenting on the investment, Bill Rogers, Managing Director, Head of Sustainable Energies at CPP Investments said, “Castrol is a high‑quality, global business at the heart of the energy and industrial economy. Its cutting-edge innovations and premium brand position it well for a growing role in emerging applications, from electric vehicles to data centres. Our investment alongside Stonepeak aligns with our strategy of backing businesses that are essential to the energy system. We believe Castrol’s strong market position and diversified growth opportunities will deliver attractive risk‑adjusted returns for the CPP Fund.”
The transaction is expected to close by end of 2026, subject to customary regulatory approvals. Simpson Thacher & Bartlett LLP and DLA Piper served as legal counsel, Paul, Weiss, Rifkind, Wharton & Garrison LLP served as financing counsel, and UBS served as financial advisor to Stonepeak.
In addition to the announcement today, an announcement in respect of a mandatory tender offer (“MTO”) to the public shareholders of Castrol India Limited, in accordance with the Indian takeover code was published by UBS Securities India Private Limited as manager in respect of the MTO. The MTO will be proceeded with only upon completion of the Castrol transaction. The relevant details have been included in the Public Announcement on the Securities and Exchange Board of India website. Khaitan & Co served as legal counsel from an Indian law perspective.
About Stonepeak
Stonepeak is a leading alternative investment firm specializing in infrastructure and real assets with approximately $80 billion of assets under management. Through its investment in defensive, hard-asset businesses globally, Stonepeak aims to create value for its investors and portfolio companies, with a focus on downside protection and strong risk-adjusted returns. Stonepeak, as sponsor of private equity and credit investment vehicles, provides capital, operational support, and committed partnership to grow investments in its target sectors, which include digital infrastructure, energy and energy transition, transport and logistics, and real estate. Stonepeak is headquartered in New York with offices in Houston, Washington, D.C., London, Hong Kong, Seoul, Singapore, Sydney, Tokyo, Abu Dhabi, and Riyadh. For more information, please visit www.stonepeak.com.About Castrol
Castrol, one of the world’s leading lubricant brands, has a proud heritage of innovation and fuelling the dreams of pioneers. Our passion for performance, combined with a philosophy of working in partnership, has enabled Castrol to develop lubricants and greases that have been at the heart of numerous technological feats on land, air, sea, and space for over 125 years.Castrol is part of the bp group and serves customers and consumers in the automotive, marine, industrial and energy sectors. Our branded products are recognized globally for innovation and high performance through our commitment to premium quality and cutting-edge technology. For more information, please visit: www.castrol.com
Contacts
For Stonepeak:
Kate Beers / Maya Brounstein
corporatecomms@stonepeak.com
+1 (646) 540-5225Continue Reading
-
The African Transport Systems Database – a geospatial database of multi-modal connected networks
Hallegatte, S., Rentschler, J. & Rozenberg, J. Lifelines: The resilient infrastructure opportunity, https://doi.org/10.1596/978-1-4648-1430-3 (World Bank, 2019).
Van Laak, D. Lifelines of our society: A global history of infrastructure, https://doi.org/10.7551/mitpress/14693.001.0001 (MIT Press, 2023).
Quium, A. A. Transport corridors for wider socio–economic development. Sustainability 11(19), 5248, https://doi.org/10.3390/su11195248 (2019).
Ijjasz-Vasquez, E. J. Saghir, J. & Noble, I. State and Trends in Adaptation Report 2021: Africa. Global Center for Adaptation https://gca.org/wp-content/uploads/2022/08/GCA_STA_2021_Complete_website.pdf (2021)
Africa Finance Corporation. The state of Africa’s infrastructure report 2024 (Africa Finance Corporation, 2024).
International Trade Centre (ITC). Made by Africa: Creating Value through Integration. ITC, Geneva. ISBN: 978-92-1-103688-6 (2022).
African Union. African Continental Free Trade Area (AfCFTA). African Union https://au-afcfta.org/ (accessed February 2025).
AfDB. Expanding Market Access in Africa and Nurturing Continental Integration. African Development Bank (2023).
World Bank. Zambia – Transport Corridors for Economic Resilience Project (English). Washington, D.C.: World Bank Group http://documents.worldbank.org/curated/en/099013124091024437 (2024).
World Bank. Africa – Abidjan-Lagos Trade and Transport Facilitation Project (ALTTFP) (English). Washington, DC: World Bank http://documents.worldbank.org/curated/en/420311468008746849 (2010).
World Bank. Kenya – Eastern Africa Regional Transport, Trade and Development Facilitation Program Project: environmental and social impact assessments for three sections: Lesseru-Marich Pass; Marich Pass-Lodwar; and Lodwar-Nakodok – executive summary (English). Washington, DC; World Bank Group http://documents.worldbank.org/curated/en/865181468194649905 (2015).
World Bank. World Bank approves US$90 million additional financing for Djibouti Regional Economic Corridor. https://www.worldbank.org/en/news/press-release/2024/09/19/world-bank-approves-us-90-million-additional-financing-for-djibouti-regional-economic-corridor (2024).
World Bank. Tunisia – Road Transport Corridors Project (English). Washington, D.C.: World Bank Group http://documents.worldbank.org/curated/en/294541468187792993 (2015).
World Bank. Africa – East Africa Trade and Transport Facilitation Project (English). Washington, D.C.: World Bank Group http://documents.worldbank.org/curated/en/209691486740413363 (2016).
European Commission. EU-Africa Global Gateway Investment Package. https://international-partnerships.ec.europa.eu/policies/global-gateway/initiatives-sub-saharan-africa/eu-africa-global-gateway-investment-package_en (accessed February 2025).
Cabestan, J. P. The Belt and Road Initiative and China’s Hegemony in Africa. Orbis 67(4), 544–564, https://doi.org/10.1016/j.orbis.2023.08.005 (2023).
Boston University Global Development Policy Center. Chinese Loans to Africa Database. http://bu.edu/gdp/chinese-loans-to-africa-database (2023).
Nsakaza, K. & Maponga, O. The Lobito Corridor as an Anchor of Economic and Value Chain Development in Angola, Democratic Republic of Congo, and Zambia: Exploring the Issues. South African Journal of Economics, https://doi.org/10.1111/saje.12402 (2025).
Africa Finance Corporation (AFC). State of Africa’s Infrastructure Report 2024. https://s3.eu-central-1.amazonaws.com/afc-assets/afc/AFC-State-of-Africas-Infrastructure-2024.pdf (Africa Finance Corporation, 2024).
African Development Bank Group. Infrastructure Financing Trends in Africa 2019–2020. African Development Bank Group. https://www.afdb.org/en/documents/infrastructure-financing-trends-africa-2019-2020 (2022).
Laurance, W. F., Sloan, S., Weng, L. & Sayer, J. A. Estimating the environmental costs of Africa’s massive development corridors. Current Biology 25.24, 3202–3208 (2015).
Churchill, S. A., Inekwe, J., Ivanovski, K. & Smyth, R. Transport infrastructure and CO2 emissions in the OECD over the long run. Transportation Research Part D: Transport and Environment 95, 102857 (2021).
Takpara, M. M., Nkemgha, G. Z., Zouri, S. & Kebalo, L. Transport infrastructure and intra-African trade: A new empirical evidence (Afreximbank Policy Research Working Paper Series No. APRWPS/2024/11). African Export-Import Bank (2024).
African Development Bank. Developing economic corridors in Africa: Rationale for the participation of the AfDB (Regional Integration Brief) https://www.afdb.org/fileadmin/uploads/afdb/Documents/Publications/Regional_Integration_Brief_-_Developing_Economic_Corridors_in_Africa_-_Rationale_for_the_Participation_of_the_AfDB.pdf (2013).
Enns, C. Mobilizing research on Africa’s development corridors. Geoforum 88, 105–108 (2018).
Bignoli, D. J. et al. Towards more sustainable and inclusive development corridors in Africa. Environmental Research: Infrastructure and Sustainability 4(3), 035012, https://doi.org/10.1016/j.geoforum.2017.11.017 (2024).
Hall, J. W., Nicholls, R. J., Tran, M. & Hickford, A. J. The Future of National Infrastructure: A System-of-Systems Approach. https://doi.org/10.1017/CBO9781107588745 (Cambridge Univ. Press, 2016).
Thorn, J. P. R., Mwangi, B. & Juffe Bignoli, D. The African Development Corridors Database. Dryad. Dataset https://doi.org/10.5061/dryad.9kd51c5hw (2022).
UNEP-WCMC. Global Infrastructure Impact Viewer (GIIV). https://www.giiviewer.org/ (Cambridge, UK: UNEP-WCMC, 2022; accessed May 2025).
Baltic Press. European Transport Maps. https://www.europeantransportmaps.com/ (accessed May 2025).
European Commission. TENtec Interactive Map Viewer. https://webgate.ec.europa.eu/tentec-maps/web/public/screen/home (accessed May 2025).
Asian Transport Observatory. Asian Transport Observatory. https://asiantransportobservatory.org/ (Asian Development Bank, 2024; accessed May 2025).
Baranzelli, C. et al. Identification, characterisation and ranking of Strategic Corridors in Africa. EUR 31069 EN, Publications Office of the European Union, Luxembourg, ISBN 978-92-76-52430-4, https://doi.org/10.2760/498757 (2022).
Guigoz, Y. et al. Spatial data infrastructures in. Africa: A gap analysis. Journal of environmental informatics 30(1), 53–62 (2017).
UNCTAD. United Nations Conference on Trade and Development. Trade-and-Transport Dataset (experimental). UNCTADstat. https://unctadstat.unctad.org/EN/Index.html (accessed November 2024).
Mphigalale, T. V. Infrastructure investment in Sub-Saharan Africa: Opportunities, risks and prospects for economic development (2020).
Obeng, D. A., Bessah, E., Amponsah, W., Dzisi, E. K. & Agyare, W. A. Ghana’s railway transport services delivery: A review. Transportation Engineering 8, 100111 (2022).
Dina, A. O. & Raji, B. A. Analysis of train speed performance on Nigeria railway corporation Lagos district narrow gauge track. Ethiopian Journal of Environmental Studies and Management, 9(2) (2017).
Ogochukwu, C. G., Ogochukwu, O. F., Ogorchukwu, I. M. & Ebuka, I. A. Assessment of the performance of railway transportation in Nigeria from 1970 to 2010. Scientific African 15, e01120, https://doi.org/10.1016/j.sciaf.2022.e01120 (2022).
Аmah, A. M. Challenges and Prospects of Multimodal Transport System in Ethiopia. BRICS Transport. 2(2), 1–6 (2023).
African Union, AfDB, UNECA. Africa regional integration index report 2019. https://www.integrate-africa.org/fileadmin/uploads/afdb/Documents/ARII-Report2019-FIN-R40-11jun20.pdf (2019).
African Development Bank. ARII. Integrate Africa. https://www.integrate-africa.org/ (accessed February 2025) (b).
AfDB. The Africa Infrastructure Development Index (AIDI) (2018).
African Development Bank. AIKP. Infrastructure Africa. https://infrastructureafrica.opendataforafrica.org/ (accessed February 2025) (a).
OurAirports. Airport data. https://ourairports.com/ (accessed June 2025).
African Development Bank. MapAfrica. https://mapafrica.afdb.org/en (accessed February 2025) (c).
AU-PIDA. African Union. PIDA projects. AU-PIDA https://www.au-pida.org/pida-projects/ (accessed February 2025).
AUDA-NEPAD. African Union Development Agency. African Infrastructure Map. African Infrastructure Database https://aid.nepad.org/welcome/project-mapping/ (accessed November 2024).
AfDB. Cross-border Road Corridors: The Quest to Integrate Africa (2019).
Goodman, S., Zhang, S., Malik, A. A., Parks, B. C. & Hall, J. AidData’s Geospatial Global Chinese Development Finance Dataset. Scientific Data 11(1), 529, https://doi.org/10.1038/s41597-024-03341-w (2024).
Padilla, A. D. et al. Compilation of geospatial data (GIS) for the mineral industries and related infrastructure of Africa. US Geological Survey. https://doi.org/10.5066/P97EQWXP (2021).
Pant, R., Hall, J. W. & Blainey, S. P. Vulnerability assessment framework for interdependent critical infrastructures: case-study for Great Britain’s rail network. European Journal of Transportation and Infrastructure Research 16(1), 174–194 (2016).
Thacker, S., Pant, R. & Hall, J. W. System-of-systems formulation and disruption analysis for multi-scale critical national infrastructures. Reliability Engineering & System Safety 167, 30–41 (2017).
Open Street Maps. Open Street Maps. https://download.geofabrik.de/ (2021).
Barron, C., Neis, P. & Zipf, A. A comprehensive framework for intrinsic OpenStreetMap quality analysis. Transactions in GIS 18(6), 877–895 (2014).
Young, M. An Open Source Routable Rail Dataset For Africa. https://github.com/trg-rail/africa_rail_network.
World Bank Group. Global Airports: Locations of airports with international travel. https://datacatalog.worldbank.org/search/dataset/0038117/Global-Airports (2020).
International Air Transport Association (IATA) https://www.iata.org/.
Verschuur, J. Global multi-hazard risk to port infrastructure and trade. Mendeley Data. V1, https://doi.org/10.17632/kdyt24tsh5.1 (2022).
UN Global Platform; IMF PortWatch https://portwatch.imf.org/.
Intergovernmental Oceanographic Commission. Ocean Data Standards Volume 1. Recommendation to Adopt ISO 3166-1 and 3166-3 Country Codes as the standard for Identifying countries in oceanographic data exchange. Version 1.1. (2010).
AfdB. Africa Development Report 2010. https://www.afdb.org/en/documents/document/african-development-report-2010-27559 (2010).
NBI Technical Reports – WRM-2022-02. Nile River Navigation – Integration of scenarios for sector development into the Strategic Water Resources Analysis. https://nilebasin.org/sites/default/files/2023-09/WRM-2022-02_Nile%2520River%2520Navigation.pdf (2022).
Pant, R., Koks, E. E., Russell, T. & Hall, J. W. Transport Risks Analysis for The United Republic of Tanzania – Systemic vulnerability assessment of multi-modal transport networks. Final Report Draft. Oxford, UK (2018).
Munyangeyo, A. & Gudmestad, O. T. Safety aspects for inland personnel transport; case study Congo River. In ISOPE International Ocean and Polar Engineering Conference (pp. ISOPE-I). ISOPE (2022).
Africa Geoportal. OpenStreetMap Waterways for Africa. https://africageoportal.maps.arcgis.com/home/item.html?id=82232d0415c04e7086414dff7eb1310f (accessed August 2025).
Lake Victoria Routes. https://victoriatugandbarge.com/routes (accessed August 2025).
Young, M. https://github.com/trg-rail/africa_rail_network/blob/02964e53f7affb045f55c9b4cd302219625a62c6/data/africa-rail.gpkg.source.txt (2022)
Fred Thomas, Tom Russell, Thibault Lestang, maxrob27 & albert8v. nismod/open-gira: v0.3.1 (v0.3.1). Zenodo. https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.14537079 (2024).
Tom Russell and snkit contributors. https://github.com/nismod/snkit (2018).
CPCS Transcom International Limited. East African Railways Master Plan Study: Final Report. Prepared for the East African Community (2009).
Boeing, G. Modeling and Analyzing Urban Networks and Amenities with OSMnx. Working paper https://geoffboeing.com/publications/osmnx-paper/ (2024).
Tripartite Transport and Transit Facilitation Programme (TTTFP). https://tttfp.org/corridors/all-corridors/ (2019).
AfDB. Study on Road Infrastructure Costs: Analysis of Unit Costs and Cost Overruns of Road Infrastructure Projects in Africa (AfDB, 2014).
World Bank. Road Costs Knowledge System (ROCKS) – Doing Business Update. Washington DC: World Bank (2018).
Koks, E. E. et al. A global multi-hazard risk analysis of road and railway infrastructure assets. Nature Communications 10(1), 2677 (2019).
Integrum Construction. Road construction costs per km in Kenya. Integrum. https://integrum.co.ke/road-construction-costs-per-km-in-kenya-2021/ (2021).
Dulac, J. Global land transport infrastructure requirements. Paris: International Energy Agency 20 (2013) (2014).
World Bank. Inflation, Consumer Prices (Annual %). World Development Indicators, World Bank, https://data.worldbank.org/indicator/FP.CPI.TOTL.ZG (accessed February 2025).
Van Rensburg, J. & Krygsman, S. Funding for roads in South Africa: Understanding the principles of fair and efficient road user charges. Transportation Research Procedia 48, 1835–1847 (2020).
Colombo, S. et al. The African Transport Systems Database – a geospatial database of multi-modal connected networks https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.17861120 (2025).
Parida, P. Unlocking mineral resource potential in southern African countries: is rail infrastructure up to the challenge?. Transportation Research Procedia 1(1), 206–215 (2014).
CPCS Transcom Limited. EAC Railway Sector Enhancement Project – Final Report. https://www.eac.int/documents/category/railways (2016).
Bouraima, M. B. & Qiu, Y. West Africa’s “Railway Patchwork” and the challenges of its integration. In Africa’s Railway Renaissance (pp. 137-161). Routledge (2023).
Wissenbach, U. & Wang, Y. African politics meets Chinese engineers: The Chinese-built standard gauge railway project in Kenya and East Africa (No. 2017/13). Working Paper (2017).
Gwilliam, K. et al. The burden of maintenance: roads in sub-Saharan Africa. AICD Background Paper, 14(4) (2008).
Gwilliam, K. Africa’s Transport Infrastructure: Mainstreaming Maintenance and Management. Directions in Development; infrastructure. World Bank (2011).
Verschuur and Tavaszzy (under review). Redundancies of African port hinterlands and their implications for new container port investments. Journal of Transport Geography (2025).
Kafeero, N. UNDER-UTILIZATION OF LAKE VICTORIA FOR CARGO TRANSPORTATION BETWEEN UGANDA, KENYA AND TANZANIA. http://lup.lub.lu.se/student-papers/record/9175862 (2024).
Serrat-Capdevila, A. et al. Port access in the Lake Tanganyika: key challenges and recommendations. https://openknowledge.worldbank.org/server/api/core/bitstreams/709225ec-9ec7-5091-9e1d-cf5d0f570214/contents (2018).
Helal, E., Elsersawy, H., Hamed, E. & Abdelhaleem, F. S. Sustainability of a navigation channel in the Nile River: A case study in Egypt. River Research and Applications 36(9), 1817–1827 (2020).
Adel Hashem, M. The Impact of Transportation Development on Investment in Egypt. L’Egypte Contemporaine 115(556), 7–30 (2024).
AU- PIDA. Establishment of a Navigational Line between Lake Victoria and the Mediterranean Sea (VICMED). https://au-pida.org/prospectus/project.php?id=44 (accessed September 2025).
Humphreys, M., Stokenberga, A., Dappe, M. H. & Hartmann, O. Port Development and Competition in East and Southern Africa: Prospects and Challenges. International Development in Focus. World Bank. https://doi.org/10.1596/978-1-4648-1410-5 (2019).
Bouazza, S., Benmamoun, Z. & Hachimi, H. The driver of hub port development in Africa. In Proceedings of the International Conference on Industrial Engineering and Operations Management, Pilsen, Czech Republic (pp. 23-26) (2019).
Simuyemba, S. Linking Africa through regional infrastructure. African Development Bank.
African Union Development Agency-NEPAD. The missing connection: Unlocking sustainable infrastructure financing in Africa. https://www.nepad.org/publication/technical-white-paper-missing-connection-unlocking-sustainable-infrastructure (2025).
Cervigni, R., Liden, R., Neumann, J. E. & Strzepek, K. M. (Eds.). Enhancing the Climate Resilience of Africa’s Infrastructure: The Roads and Bridge Sector. Africa Development Forum series. Washington, DC: World Bank, https://doi.org/10.1596/978-1-4648-0466-3. License: Creative Commons Attribution CC BY 3.0 IGO (2017).
Ji, C., Cheng, L., Li, N., Zeng, F. & Li, M. Validation of global airport spatial locations from open databases using deep learning for runway detection. IEEE Journal of Selected Topics in Applied Earth Observations and Remote Sensing 14, 1120–1131 (2020).
Chen, Y., Wei, Z. & Zhou, Q. Assessing completeness of global airport data in OSM. Advances in Cartography and GIScience of the ICA 4, 3 (2023).
Barrington-Leigh, C. & Millard-Ball, A. The world’s user-generated road map is more than 80% complete. PloS one 12(8), e0180698 (2017).
Teimoory, N., Ali Abbaspour, R. & Chehreghan, A. “Reliability extracted from the history file as an intrinsic indicator for assessing the quality of OpenStreetMap.”. Earth Science Informatics 14(3), 1413–1432 (2021).
Kim-Blanco, P., Cîrlugea, B. M. & Sherbinin, A. D. Quality assessment of crowd-sourced data: OpenStreetMap roads validation in the developing countries of West Africa. Report produced for the International Science Council’s “Commitee on Data”(CODATA)-Global Roads Data Development Task Force 10 (2018).
Mooney, P. & Minghini, M. A review of OpenStreetMap data. Mapping and the citizen sensor, 37-59 (2017).
Tang, L. & Werner, T. T. Global mining footprint mapped from high-resolution satellite imagery. Communications Earth & Environment 4(1), 134 (2023).
Central Intelligence Agency (CIA). The World Factbook (online edition). Washington, DC: CIA, 2025. https://www.cia.gov/the-world-factbook/ (accessed June 2025).
World Population Review. World Population Review. https://worldpopulationreview.com/ (accessed June 2025).
Mengisti, M., Gala, T. & Birru, G. Environmentally Conscious Least Cost Multi-Criteria Decision Making for Modeling Railway Network for Eritrea. International Journal of Sustainable Development & Planning (2021).
Center for International Earth Science Information Network—CIESIN—Columbia University and Information Technology Outreach Services—ITOS—University of Georgia. Global Roads Open Access Data Set, Version 1 (Palisades, NY: NASA Socioeconomic Data and Applications Center, 2013).
Meijer, J. R., Huijbregts, M. A., Schotten, K. C. & Schipper, A. M. Global patterns of current and future road infrastructure. Environmental Research Letters 13(6), 064006 (2018).
Overture Maps Foundation. Overture Maps. https://docs.overturemaps.org/schema/concepts/by-theme/transportation/roads/ (accessed July 2025).
Randhawa, S. et al. Paved or unpaved? A deep learning derived road surface global dataset from mapillary street-view imagery. ISPRS Journal of Photogrammetry and Remote Sensing 223, 362–374 (2025).
Colombo, S., Pant, R., Russell, T., Thomas, F., nismod/Africa-transport-database: The African Transport Systems Database (AfTS-Db), version: v1.0.0. https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.17609113 (2025).
Continue Reading
-

ScotRail’s ‘cheapest tickets’ claim is misleading, watchdog rules
ScotRail said the claim “book direct for our best price” referred to the fact that consumers who booked directly with ScotRail always paid the lowest price it offered.
A spokesperson said the rail industry operated under regulated fares with a centrally-controlled fares database from which all accredited retailers sourced their ticket prices.
They said they applied no additional booking fees to those standard fares, unlike some third-party retailers and competitors, which meant they could guarantee their best price when a consumer booked with them directly.
The ASA ruling said: “As stated, we considered the overall impression of the ad was that consumers would be able to find the cheapest ticket for a particular journey on the ScotRail website.
“As such, we considered that the claims ‘get cheapest tickets’, ‘book direct for our best price’, and ‘unbeatable on price’ discouraged consumers from searching elsewhere for cheaper tickets.
“However, they provided no evidence that, through purchasing tickets separately on the ScotRail website, they would always beat competitors’ prices.”
The ASA said that the ad must not appear again and told ScotRail to ensure they do not mislead consumers by claiming they could offer the lowest price available if that was not the case.
Continue Reading
-

Mock turkey and other forgotten festive traditions
“Lambswool – I love the name, it’s an old-fashioned Christmassy-time drink.
“It’s common throughout the UK, but in the Black Country it was known to be made for workers. Managers would give it to workers.”
Still made today but particularly popular in the Victorian period, this traditional festive drink of roasted apples in strong ale would be served in a large bowl called a jowl, the researcher said.
“They had to keep going until it was finished and it’s quite a large bowl and then they’d finish with singing a carol.”
She said “you’d mix it with a bit of” nutmeg, ginger and sugar and if “you didn’t strain it, you would see the apple kind of pulp in the drink”.
Also, people could “have tipples of home-made wines”, things like parsnip wine and elderberry wine, made in their washhouse where laundry was done.
Continue Reading
-
ECS update Indian Subcontinent to Europe & Mediterranean| Maersk
We would like to inform you of changes to the Emergency Contingency Surcharges (ECS) for Indian Subcontinent to North Europe & Mediterranean (E3W & E4W) trades. There will be changes in charges for the following route:
- India, Pakistan, Nepal, Bangladesh, Sri Lanka and Maldives to North Europe & Mediterranean
The decrease of the surcharge will take effect from the Price Calculation Date (PCD) 1 January 2026. You can see the changes to the ECS surcharge on the table published below. Our Rate Announcements page is also updated with this advisory.
All surcharge changes are subject to any required regulatory approvals and notice periods, after which the surcharge will apply. You will see any relevant surcharges on your latest invoices, and we will keep you updated of any further changes.
If you have any further questions, please contact your local Maersk office or Maersk representative. They are standing by to help. Thank you for your understanding during this time. We remain committed to supporting you and your business with your supply chain needs.
The rates apply to all OOG, SOC and NOR containers also. So 40 Flat/Open/NOR will have the same rate as 40 Dry
*North West India – Mundra, Jawaharlal Nehru, Hazira, Pipavav
*South and East India – Ennore Chennai, Kattupalli, Tuticorin, Visakhapatnam, Kolkata, Cochin, Mangalore, Haldia ports
Continue Reading
-

Fast Retailing Selected for CDP’s “A List” in Both Climate Change and Water Security, Achieving Highest Rating in the Climate Change Category of the Global Index for Fourth Consecutive Year
Last Updated: 2025.12.24
Fast Retailing Selected for CDP’s “A List” in Both Climate Change and Water Security, Achieving Highest Rating in the Climate Change Category of the Global Index for Fourth Consecutive Year
FAST RETAILING CO., LTD.
to Japanese pageFast Retailing has been recognized on the prestigious “A List” by CDP, the international nonprofit organization that runs a global environmental disclosure system, for its climate change and water security initiatives, as well as for its high level of transparency. The company earned an A List ranking in climate change for the fourth consecutive year, and in water security for the third time since 2022. Fast Retailing also received a B score in the Forests category, which evaluates corporate efforts to prevent deforestation and the conversion of natural ecosystems.
Fast Retailing’s Initiatives
Fast Retailing promotes sustainability initiatives as an integral part of its business, centered on its “LifeWear” philosophy of creating high quality clothing that improves the lives of all people around the world. In the area of climate action, the company is strengthening its efforts aiming to achieve net-zero egreenhouse gas emissions by 2050. In November 2025, Fast Retailing announced that it would raise its greenhouse gas emissions reduction target* across the supply chain to 30% (against FY2019 baseline) from the previous target of 20%. This new target has also been approved by the Science Based Targets initiative (SBTi) as a science-based target (SBT), and is in line with the level of decarbonization required to achieve the goals outlined in the Paris Agreement.* Emissions associated with raw material production, fabric production, and garment sewing for UNIQLO and GU products.
Commenting on the recognition, Yukihiro Nitta, Fast Retailing Group Executive Officer responsible for sustainability, said: “Fast Retailing is accelerating its transition toward a business model that eliminates waste by making, transporting, and selling only the products that customers truly need. Through this approach, we aim to achieve both global business growth and long‑term sustainability. In addressing climate change–our highest‑priority issue–we are further strengthening our initiatives, including raising our Scope 3 greenhouse gas reduction targets for 2030 in close collaboration with our production partners. We are also advancing water security initiatives by conducting comprehensive risk assessments and implementing actions based on those findings. We believe our continued efforts to work alongside stakeholders, to pursue initiatives that meet globally expected standards, and to maintain highly transparent disclosure have all contributed to our inclusion on this year’s CDP A List.”
About CDP
CDP’s environmental disclosure platform and evaluation process are widely regarded as the global gold standard for corporate environmental reporting. In 2025, more than 22,100 companies reported through CDP’s platform. Achieving an ‘A’ places a company among the global leaders demonstrating comprehensive disclosure, mature environmental governance, and meaningful progress towards environmental resilience. Companies on the list represent the top 4% of those evaluated by CDP.For More Information on Fast Retailing’s environmental sustainability initiatives, please see the following.
Top of pageContinue Reading
-

PSX rises over 300 points amid range-bound trading activity
KARACHI (Dunya News) – Pakistan Stock Exchange on Wednesday registered modest gains amid cautious trading by investors.
During intraday trading, the KSE-100 index gained 316.95 points to reach 171,390.68 points, marking a positive change of 0.19 percent compared to previous close of 171,073.73 points.
The Pakistan International Airlines Holding Company Limited (PIAHCL) recorded a positive change of 2.2pc with share price hovering at Rs39.82, a day after Arif Habib Consortium bought 75 percent shares of PIA for Rs135 billion.
A day earlier, the benchmark KSE-100 Index closed bearish, losing 130.44 points, a negative change of 0.08 percent, to settle at 171,073 points compared to 171,204.18 points on the previous trading day, according to PSX data.
During the session, the ready market witnessed a trading volume of 650.136 million shares with a traded value of Rs 28.256 billion, against 684.548 million shares valuing Rs 30.100 billion in the previous session. Market capitalization declined to Rs 19.396 trillion from Rs 19.435 trillion a day earlier.
Out of 481 active companies in the ready market, 151 advanced, 287 declined, while 43 remained unchanged.
Related Topics
‘ ; r_text[1] = ” ; r_text[2] = ” ; r_text[3] = ” ; r_text[4] = ” ; r_text[5] = ” ; r_text[6] = ” ; var i = Math.floor(r_text.length * Math.random()); document.write(r_text[i]);
Continue Reading