Category: 3. Business

  • China Paces Yuan Gains to Shield Exporters, Curbing Carry Trade – Bloomberg.com

    1. China Paces Yuan Gains to Shield Exporters, Curbing Carry Trade  Bloomberg.com
    2. Yuan heads for longest weekly winning streak since June  Business Recorder
    3. The strengthening of the Chinese yuan may support bitcoin prices  Bitget
    4. China’s yuan edges higher ahead of US inflation print, near 14-month high  Forex Factory
    5. PBOC sets USD/CNY reference rate at 7.0572 vs. 7.0550 previous  FXStreet

    Continue Reading

  • Samsung To Host Series of Tech Forums at CES 2026 – Samsung Global Newsroom

    Samsung To Host Series of Tech Forums at CES 2026 – Samsung Global Newsroom

    Samsung Electronics today announced that it will host a series of four moderated Tech Forum panel discussions at CES 2026, to highlight industry trends and unveil its distinct AI vision and strategy.

    Samsung’s Tech Forums will be held Jan. 5–6 at Samsung’s dedicated exhibition space in the Latour Ballroom at the Wynn Las Vegas. The company will host a total of four moderated panels covering AI, Home Appliances, Services and Design. Samsung executives along with partners, academics, media and industry analysts will participate in each session by topic:

    • When Everything Clicks: How Open Ecosystems Deliver Impactful AI (Jan. 5, 9:00 AM)  Yoonho Choi, Digital Appliances Business, Samsung Electronics (Chair, Home Connectivity Alliance)

    Description: Collaborating smart home innovators hold an open discussion on the necessity of cross-industry partnership and what it takes for meaningful smart home technology to be woven into daily living.

    • In Tech We Trust? Rethinking Security & Privacy in the AI Age (Jan. 5, 2:00 PM) — Shin Baik, Group Head, AI Platform Center, Samsung Electronics

    Description: Experts in security and AI examine the science of trust and how transparency and secure systems can spark a meaningful change for AI adoption.

    • FAST Forward: How Streaming’s Next Wave is Redefining Television (Jan. 5, 4:00 PM)
      Salek Brodsky, Executive Vice President, Visual Display Business, Samsung Electronics

    Description: Leaders in TV and entertainment explore the next wave of streaming, including free ad-supported streaming television (FAST), hybrid models and creator-led channels to shape a more interactive future.

    • The Human Side of Tech: Designing a Future Worth Loving (Jan. 6, 1:00 PM) — Mauro Porcini, President and Chief Design Officer, DX Division, Samsung Electronics

    Description: Design leaders urge the tech industry to look beyond minimalist, spec-driven approaches toward more expressive, human-centered design shaped by new materials, AI and creativity.

    In covering the latest trends in technology and daily living, the Technology Forum discussions will serve as a complement to the company’s latest product innovations, which will be showcased at the Samsung Exhibition Zone at the Wynn from Jan. 5–7.

    Continue Reading

  • Couple lose home loan complaint in face of $50,000 break fee

    Couple lose home loan complaint in face of $50,000 break fee

    The main banks are now advertising rates of 4.49 percent for 12 months.
    Photo: RNZ

    A couple who regretted their decision to fix their home loan for five years in 2023 have been unsuccessful in their complaint against their bank.

    They complained to the Banking Ombudsman, which issued a case note on its decision this month.

    It said the couple fixed their home loan for one year in 2021 and 2022. But in 2023, they refixed at the lowest rate available, which was for five years.

    Reserve Bank data shows that through 2023, the average special five-year rate was between 6.29 percent and 6.66 percent.

    This year, they contacted the bank to ask about breaking their fixed term.

    The main banks are now advertising rates of 4.49 percent for 12 months.

    The couple said the bank had misled and pressured them into refixing the loan for five years.

    The woman said she relied on advice from bank staff and wanted the bank to waive the cost of breaking the fixed term, which had been estimated at $45,000 to $50,000.

    The ombudsman scheme said it reviewed the correspondence the couple had with the bank,

    “There was no evidence bank staff pressured [her] when they refixed in 2021 and 2022. In 2021, [she] chose to fix for one year at the lowest available rate after being offered hardship assistance, which she declined. In 2022, both customers again chose a one-year term at the lowest rate.

    “In 2023, [the customer] requested a home loan review session with a senior business manager. [She] recalled the manager saying interest rates were likely to rise, and said she relied on this advice when choosing to fix for five years. The bank did not record the conference call with her, although the manager shared the standard bank disclosures with her, and the manager’s follow-up email summarised the scenarios discussed and interest rate options. The email did not contain any advice or suggestion to fix for a five-year term.”

    The ombudsman noted the woman asked about the five-year rate and accepted it, along with a $3000 loyalty payment, which required her to stay with the bank for at least three years.

    “[She] was given time, options and accurate written information before she made the decision. We found no evidence of pressure or misleading conduct by the bank.

    “We also considered whether the bank properly disclosed early repayment charges. The original loan agreement and subsequent variation letters explained how these charges were calculated and noted that such charges ‘could be large’. The bank met its obligations under the Credit Contracts and Consumer Finance Act 2003.”

    The complaint was not upheld.

    Mortgage adviser Jeremy Andrews, of Key Mortgages said he did not see many cases like this.

    “I did have a case last month where a client had fixed his loan in for five years with his bank directly at 6.39 percent. He didn’t receive any specific advice from the bank that there’s a was good chance of rates dropping over the next five years, and if they did, he could be looking at significant early payment penalties or break fees.

    “He was horrified to find out how much the break fees were, even for a small mortgage with just over three years remaining, well into five figures of fees.

    “Once we had his break fees on his mortgage, we ran figures through our break cost benefit calculator. Whilst his fees were substantial, it was looking in his favour at the time to pay the break fee to move onto lower rates at the most similar remaining term.”

    He said it was part of a mortgage adviser’s job to check clients’ goals and help structure their mortgage to achieve them.

    “We discuss the risks and costs of break fees, to confirm understanding before fixing in long term, and potential implications if there’s reasons they might want to restructure or break their fixed rate in future.”

    Longer terms we restarting to become more popular again, he said.

    Sign up for Money with Susan Edmunds, a weekly newsletter covering all the things that affect how we make, spend and invest money

    Continue Reading

  • A new era for merger control in Australia

    A new era for merger control in Australia

    From 1 January 2026, businesses will be required to notify the Australian Competition and Consumer Commission (ACCC) of certain acquisitions that meet prescribed thresholds and must not complete those transactions without prior ACCC approval.
    In response to stakeholder feedback, in December 2025, the Federal Government revised the notification thresholds and released further details regarding the waiver process. This article has been updated to reflect these latest changes.

    Requirements to notify

    Unless an exception applies, ACCC notification is required in relation to acquisitions of shares, assets, units in a unit trust, and interests in a managed investment scheme that meet the notification thresholds.

    Thresholds

    In response to stakeholder feedback, the Federal Government has materially revised the thresholds. This significantly narrows the application of the regime for certain asset acquisitions (including land transactions) that have traditionally not been the focus of merger control regimes.

    The current thresholds are set out in the table below. While most of the thresholds will apply from 1 January 2026, the thresholds applicable to acquisitions of assets that do not involve all, or substantially all of, the assets of a business will only come into effect from 1 April 2026.

     

    Acquisition type

    Threshold

    Resulting in large or larger corporate groups

     

     

    • Combined acquirer/target Australian revenue on the contract date is at least $200m; AND
      1. The target’s Australian revenue is at least $50m; OR
      2. The transaction value (i.e. market value or consideration) is at least $250m.

    Very large corporate groups 

     

    • Acquirer’s Australian revenue exceeds $500m; AND
    • The target’s Australian revenue exceeds $10m.

    Creeping or serial acquisitions

    • Either:
      1. The combined acquirer/target Australian revenue is $200m or more, and the 3 year look back test is satisfied with a specified revenue of $50m or more; OR
      2. The Australian revenue of the acquirer is $500m or more and the 3 year look back test is satisfied with a specified revenue of $10m or more,
    • AND the current acquisition is not a small acquisition.

    Supermarket land acquisitions

    • Land with a commercial building – gross lettable area >

    1,000 m2

     

    • Land without a commercial building – land size > 2,000 m2

    Applicable from 1 April 2026

     

    Asset acquisitions that do not involve all, or substantially all of, the assets of a business

     

     

    Asset acquisitions by large corporate groups

     

    • Combined acquirer/target Australian revenue on the contract date is at least $200m; AND

     

    • The transaction value is at least $200m

    Asset acquisitions by very large corporate groups

     

    • Acquirer’s Australian revenue is at least $500m; AND

     

    • The transaction value is at least $50m

    Applicable from 1 April 2026

     

    Asset acquisitions that do not involve all, or substantially all of, the assets of a business

     

     

    Asset acquisitions by large corporate groups

     

    • Combined acquirer/target Australian revenue on the contract date is at least $200m; AND

     

    • The transaction value is at least $200m

    Asset acquisitions by very large corporate groups

     

    • Acquirer’s Australian revenue is at least $500m; AND

     

    • The transaction value is at least $50m

     

    Applicable from 1 April 2026

     

    Asset acquisitions that do not involve all, or substantially all of, the assets of a business

     

    Asset acquisitions by large corporate groups

    ·                     Combined acquirer/target Australian revenue on the contract date is at least $200m; AND

    ·                     The transaction value is at least $200m

     

    Asset acquisitions by very large corporate groups

    ·                     Acquirer’s Australian revenue is at least $500m; AND

    ·                     The transaction value is at least $50m

    Key concepts in applying notification thresholds

    ‘Connected to Australia’

    In order to be notifiable, an acquisition must first be ‘connected to Australia’, meaning that:

    (a) in relation to the acquisition of a share or other interest in a body corporate, the body corporate carries on a business in Australia; or

    (b) in relation to the acquisition of an asset, the asset is used in, or forms part of, a business carried on in Australia.

    ‘Australian Revenue’

    An entity’s Australian revenue, at a time, is so much of the entity’s gross revenue, determined in accordance with accounting standards, for the entity’s most recently ended 12-month financial reporting period, that is attributable to transactions or assets within Australia, or transactions into Australia.

    ‘Connected entities’

    When calculating revenue for the purposes of the revenue tests, revenue from the acquiring entity and its connected entities is included. A ‘connected entity’ is:

    (a) a ‘related entity’ as referred to in section 4A of the Competition and Consumer Act 2010 (Cth) (Competition and Consumer Act) (subsidiary, holding and related bodies corporate); or

    (b) an entity that is controlled by, controls, or is under common control with the first entity, for the purposes of section 50AA of the Corporations Act 2001 (Cth) (Corporations Act).

    An entity may control a second entity when it controls that entity jointly with one or more associates. Connected entities of the target that are not indirectly acquired in the transaction (e.g. connected entities that are part of a vendor’s retained business) are excluded from Australian revenue calculations.

    3-year ‘look back’ test

    The revenue thresholds contain a ‘look back’ test which takes into account acquisitions in the previous 3 years. The criteria are:

    (a) the acquirer, or a connected entity of the acquirer, acquired other shares or assets (‘the previous shares or assets’) in the previous 3-year period; and

    (b) both the current shares or assets and the previous shares or assets relate to the carrying on of a business involving the supply or acquisition of comparable goods or services; and

    (c) the acquisition of the previous shares or assets and the current shares or assets, if treated as a single acquisition, would meet the specified revenue threshold.

    The following types of previous acquisitions are not included in the 3 year look back test:

    (a) acquisitions notified to the ACCC, except those notified under the creeping or serial acquisitions threshold;
    (b) acquisitions where the target revenue was less than $2 million Australian revenue;
    (c) acquisitions of certain assets below $2 million market value;
    (d) acquisitions of assets that are no longer held by the acquirer or its connected entities;
    (e) acquisitions of shares where neither the acquirer nor its connected entities have control; and
    (f) acquisitions not connected with Australia.

    Small acquisition

    A small acquisition is where:

    (a) the Australian revenue of the target (and its connected entities) is less than $2m; or
    (b) the market value of a discrete asset is less than $2m.

    Exemptions

    Control exemption

    Generally, acquisitions which do not result in control of the target business are exempt from a filing requirement. There is also an exemption for acquisitions of interests in Chapter 6 entities where the voting power of the acquirer following the acquisition is below 20%.

    However, from 1 April 2026, a filing requirement may also be triggered regardless of whether the transaction results in control if the monetary thresholds are satisfied and at least one of the following voting power thresholds are also satisfied:

    • the voting power of the acquirer moves from 20% or below, to more than 20% in an unlisted body corporate that is not widely held;
    • the voting power of the acquirer increases from between 20% and 50% to 50% or more;
    • the voting power of the acquirer moves from 20% or below to above 20% in a Chapter 6 entity where the acquirer controlled the Chapter 6 entity before the acquisition; and
    • the voting power of the acquirer moves from below 20% to 50% or more in a Chapter 6 entity where the acquirer does not control the Chapter 6 entity before or after the acquisition.

    Land related exemptions

    There are a number of exemptions for the notification of certain land and quasi-land acquisitions, including:

    acquisitions of an interest in land in the ordinary course of business, unless targeted notification requirements apply (for instance in the context of supermarket land acquisitions);

    • acquisitions of an interest in land (vacant or developed) for the purpose of:
      • developing residential premises; or
      • carrying on a business primarily engaged in buying, selling, leasing or developing land;
    • acquisition of an interest in an entity whose only non-cash asset is a legal or equitable interest in land which is held for one of the purposes noted immediately above;
    • extensions/renewals of leases for land;
    • land and quasi-land acquisitions where an acquisition of the relevant equitable interest in land or quasi-land right was previously notified, subject to a waiver, or acquired prior to 31 December 2025;
    • land development rights; and
    • sale and leaseback arrangements.

    Financial market exemptions

    There are a number of exemptions for the notification of certain financial market transactions, including in relation to:

    • clearing and settlement facilities, exercising a contractual right of set-off, or of combination of accounts, or to close out a transaction;
    • capital raising, share buy-backs, dividend reinvestment and foreign exchange contracts;
    • derivatives, where the acquisition does not result in control;
    • debt instruments, loans, debt interests in an entity, and securities financing transactions, where the acquisition does not result in control;
    • asset securitisation arrangements;
    • the enforcement of a security interest, where the acquisition is in the ordinary course of providing financial accommodation and the parties to the acquisition are dealing at arm’s length; and
    • custodial or depository services, certain trustees, and acquisitions by a nominee upon the conversion of regulatory capital instruments under certain circumstances.

    Other exemptions

    A number of additional exemptions apply to acquisitions that occur in relation to:

    • internal restructures or reorganisations;
    • external administration;
    • the transfer of members’ benefits between superannuation entities, or acquisitions resulting from a change of trustee of a superannuation entity; and
    • the operation of a law of the Commonwealth, or of a State or Territory.

    ACCC review and determination

    Timeline overview

    Pre notification

    While not mandatory, the ACCC encourages parties to engage in pre-notification discussions before formally notifying an acquisition. Such engagement allows parties to proactively raise issues that are likely to be relevant to the ACCC’s assessment. It also provides an opportunity for the ACCC to engage with the parties to ensure it has sufficient information to conduct its assessment.

    Pre-notification engagement with the ACCC is encouraged as it can streamline the ACCC’s review and reduce the risk of timeline extensions. The ACCC anticipates that in the most straightforward matters, pre-notification is likely to take approximately 2 weeks, but that in complex matters, pre-notification is likely to take at least 4 weeks.

    Waiver

    The ACCC has the discretion to grant notification waivers. If a waiver is granted, the acquisition need not be notified under the standard notification pathway (as noted below) and can proceed without a formal ACCC approval decision. This waiver process can streamline timing and reduce costs for straightforward transactions.

    The ACCC has indicated that it intends to grant waivers for low-risk or simple transactions which can be determined on the papers. Such circumstances may include where:

    • There is no or very limited competitive overlap, market definition is clear (or the decision can be made without reaching a view on market definition) and market concentration is low (e.g. less than 5% on the narrowest possible markets).
    • There are no vertical or conglomerate issues or, where there are vertical or conglomerate considerations, both the market concentration and market shares of each of the merger parties in the relevant market(s) are low (for example, market shares of less than 5%).
    • There are no complex scenarios or legal issues, such as:
      • a potential loss of future competition, including where the target is a potential new entrant (or is a nascent competitor with the potential to expand) in the acquirer’s market, or the acquirer might be a potential entrant or nascent competitor in the target’s market (such as an overseas company that would be likely, absent the acquisition, to enter the Australian market in which the target operates);
      • market concentration is already significant or high;
      • the target appears to be a vigorous and effective competitor;
      • a failing firm scenario; or
      • complicated market definitions or the merger parties operate across multiple segments.
    • There is unlikely to be risk of harm to consumers as a result of the acquisition.
    • There are no issues that are likely to warrant consultation by the ACCC and/or inquiries with third parties.

    The ACCC’s waiver decisions will still be published on the publicly available Acquisitions Register within 1 business day of the decision.

    Notification

    If the notification thresholds are met and no exemption or waiver applies, parties must lodge a notification (in the prescribed form) and obtain ACCC approval prior to completion. The ACCC’s review and determination process for notified transactions is outlined below.

    Phase 1

    The ACCC must complete a Phase 1 assessment of a transaction within 30 business days of receiving a notification. It will gather information from the parties and stakeholders. At the end of Phase 1, the ACCC may:

    • approve the acquisition;
    • approve the acquisition with conditions; or
    • issue a Phase 2 notice for further consultation.

    Most acquisitions are likely to be approved during phase 1. An acquisition will only proceed to phase 2 if the ACCC is satisfied that the acquisition could have the effect, or likely effect, of substantially lessening competition.

    Phase 2

    Phase 2 involves a more detailed review which will run for up to 90 business days. By day 25, the ACCC will issue a Notice of Competition Concerns, outlining its preliminary assessment. Parties may respond to the concerns and offer a solution that would permit the acquisition to proceed.

    At the conclusion of Phase 2, the ACCC can decide to:

    • approve the acquisition;
    • approve the acquisition with conditions; or
    • refuse approval.

    Public Benefits Phase

    Following the ACCC’s conclusion of a phase 2 review, parties may apply for a Public Benefit Review if they believe the acquisition delivers a net public benefit. This phase lasts up to 50 business days. The ACCC has indicated that it expects few transactions will proceed to this stage.

    14 day holding period

    Transaction parties should be aware that they must wait 14 days after receiving ACCC approval before proceeding with a transaction (in order to allow third parties the opportunity to lodge review applications to the Australian Competition Tribunal).

    Fees

    The filing fees (for mandatory and voluntary notifications) are as follows:

    Review Required 

    Fees 

    Notification Waiver

    $8,300

    Phase 1 Notification

    $56,800

    Phase 2 Notification

     

    $475,000 – for transactions valued under $50m

    $855,000 – for transactions valued between $50m and $1b

    $1,595,000 – for transactions valued over $1b

    Public Benefits Application

    $401,000

    Key Takeaways

    • Transaction timelines will need to take into account ACCC filing processes.
    • Buyers and sellers will need to assess completion risks arising prior to obtaining clearance – particularly where the ACCC notification is public.
    • The timing of ACCC notifications will need to take into account confidentiality implications of notifying transactions.

    Continue Reading

  • Netflix and Paramount are fighting over Warner Bros. Discovery. Here's the regulatory outlook – Courthouse News

    1. Netflix and Paramount are fighting over Warner Bros. Discovery. Here’s the regulatory outlook  Courthouse News
    2. Warner Bros CEO David Zaslav on Paramount offering ‘Big’ payout if company accepts merger at lower value: ‘It would be inappropriate to discuss…’  The Times of India
    3. “Larry Didn’t Show Up, and David Got Ahead of His Skis”  Puck
    4. Netflix Just Bought Warner Bros. And HBO: Here’s Why It Matters  bgr.com
    5. Trump World is picking sides in the battle for Warner Bros.  livemint.com

    Continue Reading

  • Why does Enbridge Gas get a free pass in Ontario?

    Why does Enbridge Gas get a free pass in Ontario?





    A few months ago, Ontario reporter Fatima Syed mentioned she’d been looking into “kind of complicated agreements” that the vast majority of municipalities in the province have signed with Enbridge Gas.

    These contracts are technical, sure, but they’re also important: they allow the natural gas company to access public land to install pipelines, free of charge. 

    It’s not like that everywhere. Many Canadian provinces, including British Columbia and Alberta, permit municipalities to levy fees for this access, which can bring in tens of millions in annual revenue.

    Ontario still has a law that prohibits this — it considers providing natural gas to heat homes a “public good.” But as home heating options expand and the world moves away from fossil fuels, at least two municipalities in the province are pushing back. 

    Fatima has been investigating energy issues in Ontario since 2019: cultivating sources, filing freedom of information requests and poring over opaque technical agreements. 

    Her persistence earned her this week’s scoop: the Waterloo Regional Municipality, which includes the cities of Waterloo, Kitchener and Cambridge, recently declined to renew its agreement with Enbridge, which would have locked in 20 more years of free access for gas pipelines.

     

    Continue Reading

  • Around 30% of Canadian renters spend 50% of income on rent: survey

    Around 30% of Canadian renters spend 50% of income on rent: survey

    A new survey reveals nearly one-third of renters are giving up over half their income to their landlord, despite rental prices across the country declining for a 14th straight month.

    According to the Winter 2025 Renter Feedback Survey from Rentals.ca, over 62 per cent of renters spend 30 per cent of their income on rent, while a third report spending over half their income on rent, and 12 per cent spend 70 per cent of their income on rent.

    For those aged between 25 and 34, 43 per cent report spending over half of their income on rent, while 37 per cent of renters aged 35 to 54 report about the same.

    Rentals.ca spokesperson Giacomo Ladas tells 660 NewsRadio that, according to responses from 503 renters across Canada, 70 per cent of renters budget under $2,000 a month for a new apartment, but old sayings around how much to spend on rent appear not to apply anymore.

    “Typically, we would see that 30 per cent was kind of that go-to number of ‘Hey, if you want to have any type of housing, try to spend around 30 per cent of your income towards rent,’ but that’s really not the case at all,” he said.

    The perspective of renters across the country was also included in the survey.

    Around 63 per cent of renters say rent prices have increased since the summer, and 69 per cent of respondents are most concerned about high rent prices in their online search, compared to concerns about supply, listing quality, or scams.

    Ladas says while there has been an influx in rental scams, which typically target a “desperate consumer base,” the perspective of renters reveals the reality of the market.

    “I do think when people are saying that 69 per cent are seeing that rental prices are the biggest challenge they face, I think that’s quite interesting when you factor that rental prices have been going down, because it shows how inflated they really are,” he said.

    Statistics Canada says the annual inflation rate was 2.2 per cent in November.

    Meanwhile, according to the latest monthly report from Rentals.ca and Urbanation, asking rents in Canada dropped to 3.1 per cent in November from the previous year to an average of $2,074 — the 14th straight month of annual declines.

    B.C., Alberta, and Ontario had the largest rental declines, the average dropping to $2,392, $1,775, and $2,296, respectively.

    Average asking rents were also down 1.5 per cent month-over-month, the largest such drop of 2025, with rents now at the lowest level since June 2023. However, average asking rents are still 3.4 per cent higher than three years ago.

    With files from Lisa Grant


    Continue Reading

  • Live markets updates: Wall Street rallies on AI rebound, ASX set to open higher

    Live markets updates: Wall Street rallies on AI rebound, ASX set to open higher

    Market snapshot

    • ASX 200 futures: +0.5% to 8,640 points
    • Australian dollar: -0.1% to 66.05US cents
    • Wall Street (Friday): S&P500 +0.9%, Dow +0.6%, Nasdaq +1.3%
    • Europe (Friday): Dax +0.4%, FTSE +0.5%, Eurostoxx +0.4%
    • Spot gold (Friday): +0.1% to $US4,338/ounce
    • Brent crude (Friday): +1.1% to $US 60.47/barrel
    • Iron ore (Friday): -0.4% to $US104.0/tonne
    • Bitcoin: +0.3% at $US88,431

    Prices current at around 7:10am AEDT

    Wall Street bounces on AI rally, ASX set to rise

    We may not have officially entered the so-called “Santa Rally” zone, but Wall Street enjoyed some festive cheer ahead of the shortened trading week.

    All the key US indices rose led in particular by the tech sector.

    The S&P 500 gained 0.9%, the Dow 0.4% and the Nasdaq 1.3%.

    The optimistic sentiment was widespread.

    The pan-Europe Eurostoxx 600 gained 0.4%, while the global MSCI benchmark rose 0.7% across the day.

    For Europe, it marked a record close. Once again, aerospace and defence stocks were in the hottest demand.

    The performance of Micron Technology in the US, which jumped 7% thanks to a broker upgrade, buoyed the somewhat wobbly AI cohort.

    Nvidia picked up almost 4% and Oracle rose 6.4% after signing a binding agreement with Byte Dance, the Chinese owner of Tik Tok, to run the US operations of the social media platform.

    “The return to a more optimistic tone around the AI trade is certainly helping a number of things across the board,” Rosenblatt Securities trader Michael James told Reuters.

    “It was certainly helping the Nasdaq in a meaningful way yesterday and again today,” he said.

    “We’re not out of the woods, but it certainly feels a lot better today than it did most of the course of the last week.”

    The US dollar index rose marginally, although the Australian dollar largely held its ground.

    On commodity markets, the global oil benchmark, Brent Crude rose 1.1% to $US60.47/barrel on the prospect of supply disruptions from a U.S. blockade of Venezuelan tankers.

    Spot gold edged higher and silver rose 2.8% to yet another record high, hitting $US67.22/ounce

    Good morning

    Good morning, and welcome to another day on the ABC markets and finance blog.

    Stephen Letts from ABC business team limbering up for a blow-by-blow coverage of the day’s events, where every post is hopefully a winner, but none should be construed as financial advice.

    In short, it looks like the local market will start the shortened trading week on a positive note.

    Futures trading is pointing to the ASX gaining around 0.5% on opening, clawing back some of the 0.9% it shed last week.

    As always, the game’s afoot, so let’s get blogging.

    Loading

    Continue Reading

  • Safety fears as Embark Education launches takeover bid for childcare rival, Mayfield

    Safety fears as Embark Education launches takeover bid for childcare rival, Mayfield

    Australian childcare company Embark Education has launched a bid for rival early childcare company Mayfield Education, alarming experts who say for-profit providers that fail to meet baseline safety standards are being allowed to expand without oversight.

    Embark is planning to more than double in size after announcing an off-market takeover bid for Mayfield Education last month.

    If successful, Embark — which operates under brands including Appleberries, Brighthouse, Cubby Care and Roseberry — would grow the number of centres under its control from 39 to 84.

    However, industry experts say the company is in no position to expand while its existing services fail to meet national quality standards.

    Data from childcare authority ACECQA shows 26 per cent of Embark’s long-day care centres failed national quality standards — almost three times the for-profit industry average of 9 per cent.

    “I think it’s extremely concerning that a company with such a bad record … is planning to expand dramatically,” Andrew Scott, an emeritus professor at Deakin University, said.

    He said he was concerned Embark was able to act despite a wave of tighter childcare regulations introduced in July following scandals involving other childcare providers.

    Mr Scott said the scandals gave rise to concerns about “companies pursuing profit ruthlessly from taxpayer subsidies at the expense of care and safety for Australian children”.

    Takeover bid flagged in October

    Embark, formerly known as Evolve Early Learning, made its takeover intentions clear in October when it purchased nearly 20 per cent of Mayfield’s shares.

    Former Genius Childcare boss Darren Misquitta has pleaded guilty after receiving money obtained through forgery.  (LinkedIn)

    Stock market filings indicate the shares were bought from Darren Misquitta, the head of embattled childcare empire Genius Education.

    Embark is offering 50c per share to Mayfield shareholders, who have been advised by Mayfield to take no action over the proposal yet.

    A booklet detailing the offer is due to be sent to shareholders in January.

    Embark has been approached for comment.

    Mayfield is flailing in part because of its dealings with Mr Misquitta, who in August pleaded guilty to receiving $120,000 in suspected proceeds of crime from a business associate not associated with the childcare industry.

    Steps Early Learning was poised to take over at least six Genius centres in May, but that deal appears to have fallen through.

    Steps had applied for provider approval to run childcare centres as long ago as May, but still had not received it as of November 2025.

    Steps did not respond to the ABC’s questions.

    Experts warn against ‘complex financial web’

    The Productivity Commission is calling for a national Early Childhood Education and Care Commission to provide oversight of for-profit providers following concerns about the risk of putting profit over child safety.

    The New South Wales government recently ordered another childcare giant, Affinity, to stop acquiring more centres after services it runs were at the centre of safety breaches and an abuse scandal at the hands of accused educator, Joshua Brown.

    But with only two of its present 39 services located in NSW, Embark is unlikely to fall under the same oversight.

    Professor Scott said there “absolutely should be” closer oversight of deals like Embark’s Mayfair takeover by childcare regulators.

    “There are too many gaps in these new regulations, including between state and federal responsibilities,”

    he said.

    “And in those gaps, this company is planning to weave yet another complex financial web to make profits.”

    He said it was generally accepted there was a place for for-profit centres in the childcare system.

    But he added that there was too much “excessive profiteering” and the federal minister responsible for the sector, Jason Clare, should use his powers to rebalance the system towards not-for-profits.

    Jason Clare seen between two people.

    Jason Clare previously flagged a national register for childcare workers was needed. (ABC News: Adam Kennedy)

    “What’s happened is that it has become an industrial-scale exercise in sweeping up taxpayer subsidies to make money, and care and education of children isn’t part of these companies’ agendas,” he said.

    One of Embark’s New South Wales centres, Carlton House Childcare Centre and Preschool in Dubbo, came under scrutiny from the NSW regulator in 2024, according to documents released through a NSW parliamentary order.

    In one incident detailed in the documents on July 16, an educator was allegedly found lying on a mat with an infant, with a child’s blanket completely covering her head.

    The next day, an educator and a child were allegedly observed in a yelling match, with the child claiming the educator had “grabbed [them] on the shoulder and threw [them] on the log”.

     Embark was issued a warning letter to comply with the national law.

    Loading…

    Continue Reading

  • West Berkshire Council announces more than 600 EV charge points

    West Berkshire Council announces more than 600 EV charge points

    The scheme will also include infrastructure for a further 300 future charge points across West Berkshire to ensure the network can grow as demand increases in public car parks and on-street locations.

    Installations are expected to begin in 2026 and the council said locations would be confirmed once feasibility studies were completed.

    Stuart Gourley, the authority’s executive member for environment and highways, called the project “a major step forward in delivering our climate and transport strategy”.

    He said: “By expanding public EV infrastructure, we’re enabling more residents to support our net-zero goals by choosing sustainable travel and future proofing the district as demand grows.”

    Connected Kerb chief executive Chris Pateman-Jones said the partnership was “all about giving every resident the confidence to go electric”.

    The 20-year contract includes a revenue-share model, capped tariffs to keep charging affordable and “strong service level agreements to ensure performance and reliability”.

    At the end of the contract, all infrastructure will transfer to the council for long-term public benefit.

    Continue Reading