
JD.com (NasdaqGS:JD) is making headlines as it aims to expand into Hong Kong’s insurance sector, even as recent regulatory moves affect its digital asset projects in the region. These changes offer fresh insight into the company’s evolving strategy and challenges.
See our latest analysis for JD.com.
JD.com’s latest push into insurance comes at a pivotal moment for the stock. Despite steady innovation and expansion, momentum has faded over the past year, with shares closing at $33.19 and a -14.4% total shareholder return. Looking further back, long-term holders have faced deeper losses. Investors are now weighing how JD.com’s strategic shifts and regulatory headwinds might reshape its outlook.
Curious to see what other dynamic companies are shaking up their industries? It could be time to broaden your search and discover fast growing stocks with high insider ownership
The question now is whether JD.com’s recent share slump signals a compelling value opportunity or if the market is already factoring in the company’s future growth potential. Could this be a turning point for investors?
With the narrative’s fair value target sitting at $45.12, substantially above JD.com’s last close, there is a significant gap in how analysts and the market are currently pricing the company. This disparity is setting the stage for an intriguing debate about JD.com’s future prospects and the underlying growth story.
Diversification into high-growth and synergistic businesses, especially food delivery, general merchandise, and international retail, are driving new user cohorts, accelerating cross-selling, and establishing new revenue streams, which should underpin top-line growth and gradually improve Group-level net margins as these businesses scale.
Read the complete narrative.
Curious what’s fueling that bullish outlook? The narrative hinges on a powerful combination of revenue acceleration, margin expansion, and a future earnings multiple usually reserved for mature industry leaders. Want to know the precise projections guiding this premium price? Dive in to discover what assumptions drive the analysts’ valuation and see if they could reshape your entire perspective on JD.com.
Result: Fair Value of $45.12 (UNDERVALUED)
Have a read of the narrative in full and understand what’s behind the forecasts.
However, intensifying competition in food delivery and persistent margin pressure could quickly test whether this optimistic outlook holds true for JD.com.
Find out about the key risks to this JD.com narrative.

Gold prices rallied hard amid the chaos of the reciprocal tariff roll-out in early April. Once that episode was over, they went into a holding pattern and stayed there until Chair Powell’s dovish speech at Jackson Hole on August 22, which unleashed a true frenzy of precious metals buying. The IMF/WB annual meetings burst that bubble and precious metals prices have gone back into the same holding pattern they went into once the April tariff shock had worn off. However, my sense is that the underlying drivers of the “debasement trade” are only getting stronger, so that will keep going.
In today’s post, I lay out how markets might evolve now that the “gold rush” of recent months has ended. Needless to say, forecasting is a dangerous business and I’ll likely be wrong on many fronts. But I feel strongly that the “debasement trade” is here to stay and will only build over the medium term. If that is true, the question then becomes where this trade will pop up next. Will it again be in precious metals, in longer-term yields, in equities or in currencies? I discuss all this in today’s post.
Why the “debasement trade” will build: the Fed is cutting as underlying inflation rises. The “debasement trade” is about the fear that central banks will bend to the will of politicians and monetize unsustainable government debt levels. Some of this “fiscal dominance” is already playing out in the US. The left chart below shows the drivers of monthly core CPI inflation (black line). My preferred measure of underlying inflation – what inflation is after you filter out all the noise – is the blue bars, which have trended up for half a year. That just isn’t an environment where the Fed should be cutting, let alone be in a substantial easing cycle. The blue line in the right chart below shows that markets price almost five 25 basis point rate cuts between now and the end of 2026. The fact that the Fed isn’t pushing back on this market pricing understandably raises questions about its credibility and is one reason why longer-term Treasury yields (the red line in the right chart below) remain high even as more and more Fed cuts get priced.
Why the “debasement trade” will build: fewer safe haven assets. I’ve been banging on about how safe haven countries like Japan or Germany are losing that status. Indeed, there are many places across the G10 where fiscal policy is unsustainable, not just in the US. This is why the Dollar was stable in the course of the precious metals rally in recent months, as the blue line in the left chart below shows. The debasement trade isn’t about the US, it’s about a much broader loss of confidence in fiat currencies. The Japanese Yen would have been a key place to hide in the past, but the blue line in the right chart below shows that’s tumbling against the Dollar. The safe havens of today are Switzerland (black line), Sweden (red line) and Norway (orange line). Unsurprisingly, these are places where government debt is low because fiscal policy hasn’t become unmoored.

Where will the “debasement trade” pop up next? Precious metals are back in the same holding pattern they were in after the April tariff shock wore off. Longer-term bond yields are in a similar holding pattern as markets price more and more rate cuts for G10 central banks, which is pulling long-end yields down for now. Perhaps the best “debasement trade” currently is the S&P 500, which is up over 15 percent so far this year. President Trump frequently looks to the stock market as validation of his policies. The S&P 500 won’t be allowed to fall. What will also not fall is the Dollar, which – as the left chart below shows – has been stable since its sharp fall in April. So much “bad news” is priced into rate differentials, which have moved massively against the Dollar, that the only way for the greenback is up. Indeed, over the past few weeks, I’ve heard more and more talk of a return of “US exceptionalism.” Sentiment on the Dollar is changing for the better.


American Express (AXP) recently posted impressive third-quarter earnings, which has driven a fresh wave of market optimism. The company has raised its full-year revenue and EPS guidance. This decision signals management’s upbeat outlook on ongoing business momentum.
See our latest analysis for American Express.
American Express shares have rallied this year, recently closing at $357.56 after a series of upbeat announcements, including stronger-than-expected third-quarter results, the launch of a refreshed platinum card, and a successful $2 billion bond offering. With a 19.8% share price return so far in 2025 and an impressive five-year total shareholder return of 316.9%, momentum appears to be building as the company doubles down on premium products and deepens its moat.
If you’re curious to see what else is delivering outsized growth lately, now’s the perfect time to explore fast growing stocks with high insider ownership
With American Express stock hovering near all-time highs after stellar results, investors may wonder if the recent rally has left little room for upside, or if there is still a compelling opportunity to buy before further growth is fully priced in.
With American Express’s fair value currently pegged below the last close, the most popular narrative points to the shares trading at a premium. The story behind this valuation involves both the company’s track record and its future growth blueprint.
“Sustained momentum in acquiring younger (Millennial and Gen Z) cardholders, with these groups showing strong spend growth and lower delinquency rates compared to industry averages, suggests a successful strategy in capturing the next generation of affluent consumers, which should drive future billed business and support earnings stability.”
Read the complete narrative.
Want to know what powers this rich price tag? The narrative revolves around bold, double-digit top-line projections, robust profit margins, and a future earnings multiple that tops industry norms. Find out which financial levers analysts are betting on, and whether they are realistic or too optimistic.
Result: Fair Value of $338.24 (OVERVALUED)
Have a read of the narrative in full and understand what’s behind the forecasts.
However, there are still clear risks, including intensifying competition and shifting consumer payment preferences, which could challenge American Express’s premium growth trajectory.
Find out about the key risks to this American Express narrative.
Looking at American Express through the lens of its price-to-earnings ratio paints a mixed picture. Although it trades at 23.7x earnings, this is lower than similar peers averaging 29.4x. However, it is notably higher than the broader industry average of 10.1x and above the fair ratio of 21.5x analysts believe the market could eventually reflect. This gap suggests investors are paying a premium for quality and track record, but also raises questions about potential downside if growth expectations are not met. Is the premium justified, or is caution warranted?

Kirin Holdings Company (TSE:2503) shares have edged higher over the past month, drawing attention from investors interested in the food and beverage sector. The stock’s upward trend raises questions about what is driving recent sentiment.
See our latest analysis for Kirin Holdings Company.
Kirin’s share price has climbed 11.3% over the past three months, reflecting a wave of renewed optimism about its growth outlook, while the total shareholder return over the past year sits at 1.5%. Investors watching this steady uptrend may be sensing improving fundamentals and a potential rerating on valuation, especially as the sector sees pockets of positive momentum.
If you’re looking to broaden your search for fresh opportunities, consider exploring fast growing stocks with strong insider ownership. fast growing stocks with high insider ownership
The question now is whether Kirin’s recent rally still offers attractive value for new investors, or if the market has already factored in the company’s potential for future growth. Is there a buying opportunity left?
Kirin Holdings trades at a price-to-earnings ratio of 33.4 times, which is notably higher than both its industry average and the fair multiple suggested by valuation models. The current share price of ¥2,221.5 puts this premium in focus.
The price-to-earnings (P/E) ratio measures how much investors are willing to pay for each unit of the company’s earnings. For an established food and beverage group like Kirin, this number reflects market expectations for profit stability, future growth, and sector competitiveness. However, such a high P/E raises the question of whether recent optimism is running ahead of underlying performance.
Compared to the Asian Beverage industry average of 19.6x, Kirin’s stock is expensive. It also exceeds the company’s own estimated fair P/E of 30.5x, suggesting the stock could be priced for stronger growth or efficiency gains than currently forecast. If expectations reset, the market could drive the multiple closer to this fair ratio in the future.
Explore the SWS fair ratio for Kirin Holdings Company
Result: Price-to-Earnings of 33.4x (OVERVALUED)
However, slower revenue growth or shifts in market sentiment could quickly cool enthusiasm and put downward pressure on Kirin’s current valuation premium.
Find out about the key risks to this Kirin Holdings Company narrative.
While Kirin looks expensive based on its price-to-earnings ratio, the SWS DCF model offers a very different takeaway. According to this approach, the stock is trading at a steep 60% discount to its estimated fair value of ¥5,552.77. This suggests that, even after its recent run, the market may be overlooking longer-term cash flow potential. Could investors be underestimating Kirin’s future growth, or is there something the DCF is not capturing?

Dr. Ing. h.c. F. Porsche (XTRA:P911) reported current net profit margins of 2.5%, down sharply from last year’s 10.2%, as earnings continued to trend lower. Over the past five years, the company’s earnings have decreased by an average of 9.2% per year, but management now projects annual earnings growth of 36.1%, which would easily outpace the broader German market’s expected 16.4%. Revenue growth is only forecast at 3% per year, trailing the industry pace, and with profit margins under pressure, the focus now shifts to whether future performance can validate these ambitious growth forecasts.
See our full analysis for Dr. Ing. h.c. F. Porsche.
The next section puts the headline results in context by weighing them against the dominant investor narratives. This highlights where the stories align and where they diverge.
See what the community is saying about Dr. Ing. h.c. F. Porsche
Porsche’s profit margins have declined to 2.5% from last year’s 10.2%, reflecting ongoing headwinds and the impact of restructuring costs.
According to analysts’ consensus view, management’s aggressive cost controls, including a 15% workforce reduction by 2029, are expected to help margins recover.
Consensus narrative highlights that efficiency programs should structurally lower expenses after 2025, which could potentially reverse the margin squeeze.
However, the continued impact of macroeconomic and industry challenges is expected to keep margins below historic highs for several years.
Porsche is currently trading at a price-to-earnings ratio of 45.1x, significantly above the peer average of 8.4x and the auto industry average of 18.8x, but below its DCF fair value of €63.43 per share.
Analysts’ consensus view notes that despite the premium valuation relative to earnings, the share price of €47.16 remains 25.6% below the DCF fair value, which may justify holding for long-term profit growth.
Consensus narrative points to strong expected earnings growth of 36.1% annually, a key factor supporting this gap.
Some skepticism remains because the analyst price target of €44.27 is only 5.8% above the current price, signaling limited expected upside in the near term.
Persistent sales declines in China, with volume down over 50% from peak, and slow luxury EV adoption are major challenges that directly threaten revenue and margin recovery prospects.
According to the analysts’ consensus view, these risks could weigh on Porsche’s ability to deliver forecasted growth and maintain profitability.
Consensus narrative flags that overexposure to China raises geopolitical and regulatory risks, making recovery dependent on improving market conditions there.
Additional restructuring and tariffs, especially in the US and EU, are driving up costs that cannot easily be offset, putting further downward pressure on margins and free cash flow.

Alphabet (NASDAQ:GOOGL) shares are up 51% over the past 12 months. But that’s nothing compared to many of the stocks in my quantum computing watchlist. Several of them are up more than 1,000%.
So, why am I talking about Alphabet and quantum computing?
Well, if you’ve been following this rather exciting sector you’ll know that Alphabet — the parent company of Google — is advancing its own quantum technologies, and it’s doing rather well.
Pure-play quantum computing stocks have been in vogue over the past 12 months, but they’re small companies, with relatively short pockets, and often no cash flow.
Alphabet on the other hand is a technology giant. Among other pros, it’s has a huge net cash position of over $50bn. I think its pockets are so deep that it could buy all of the pure-plays and have money left over.
Google’s recent demonstration of verifiable quantum advantage (doing something faster than a supercomputer) with its Willow chip and the Quantum Echoes algorithm is a milestone for quantum computing.
The experiment showed that complex simulations — such as molecular modelling — could be performed thousands of times faster than on the world’s fastest classical supercomputers.
From an investment perspective, this is important because it signals that quantum computing is moving from theory to practical application. In fact, Alphabet believes we will see real-world applications of quantum computing in the next five years.
Companies leading in this space are building a technological and competitive advantage that could one day open up opportunities in pharmaceuticals, materials science, and optimisation problems.
Early adoption could translate into faster innovation cycles and new revenue streams. For investors, breakthroughs like this highlight the potential of quantum technologies to reshape industries and generate long-term value.
For now, I don’t believe Google’s quantum computing achievements are really reflected in the share price. Which is strange because some of the pure-play quantum stocks are trading at ridiculous valuations.
However, if Alphabet continues to deliver these updates as we move towards a real-world application, I have no doubt that it will be reflected in the share price.
Personally, I believe Alphabet is among the best value mega-cap stocks. It’s often wrongly compared with communications peers when it’s really a technology giant.
Looking at the figure, the stock is currently trading around 26 times forward earnings. That’s broadly in line with the information technology sector average.

Nicola HaselerHertfordshire
BBC/Nicola HaselerA pensioner who ploughed £40,000 into a fraudulent wine investment scheme has warned others not to fall for similar scams after three men were jailed.
Terry Fleming, 81, from Croxley Green, Hertfordshire, said he invested the money over two years believing he would make a profit, but eventually had to sell the bottles at a considerable loss.
Three men who stole at least £6m from 41 victims in the scheme were given prison terms to at St Albans Crown Court on Friday.
Mr Fleming said the scam “sounded believable” but the men only “cared about how much money they were going to make”.
Benjamin Cazaly, 43, of Coach House, Orpington, south-east London, was jailed for six and a half years; Dominic D’Sa, 46, of Oxford Avenue, Wimbledon, south-west London, for four and a half years; and Gregory Assemakis, 40, of Plaistow Grove, Bromley, south-east London, for three and a half years.
They had been found guilty of fraudulent trading in August.
Cazaly founded Imperial Wines of London in 2008.
It claimed to be a family-run investment house with offices in Paris and Hong Kong.
In reality, it was a call centre in an office building in Groveland Court, London, which was raided by trading standards in November 2018.
An investigation by Hertfordshire Trading Standards found £37m passed through Imperial Wine & Spirits Merchants’ accounts during the 10 years it was trading.
Hertfordshire County CouncilThe mantra “no means yes” was written on the wall, and they used films such as The Wolf of Wall Street to learn manipulation tricks.
Cold callers used fake names and followed scripts – found when the office was raided – to persuade pensioners to hand over their money.
Victims were sent glossy brochures that used logos from the Daily Telegraph and the Financial Times without permission.
Hertfordshire County Council said the jury was played a recording where a confused woman was asked for payment card details despite not knowing what a card was or who she banked with.
It said the long-running scam saw pensioners convinced to spend their life savings on wine investments which had vastly inflated prices.
Investors were told the company did not make money unless the wine was sold at a profit.
Mr Fleming said: “It sounded believable.
“It didn’t seem like you were paying a small price and getting a huge return, it would be an average purchase price and a reasonable profit selling price.”
But staff from Imperial Wines of London kept contacting him.
“They offered me better and better deals,” he said.
“Instead of just a slight profit, these were really good wines that were going to make a lot of money. I said ‘no, no, no’ and they kept coming back trying to sell me more and more wine.”
What Mr Fleming didn’t realise was that the bottles he was paying £2,000 for were only worth £400. In the end he had to sell them at a loss.
“They sold some of it for me at a loss but some of the wine just disappeared,” he said.
“I just gave up in the end. All they cared about was how much money they were going to make. “
Hertfordshire County CouncilTrish Burls, from National Trading Standards, said: “Victims in this case lost thousands of pounds through a co-ordinated scam of lies, deceit and manipulation.
“The criminals exploited people’s passion and enthusiasm, preying on them to invest while stripping many of their life savings and causing significant emotional distress.”
Ajanta Hilton, executive member for community safety at Hertfordshire County Council, added: “The stories of those targeted with this investment scam are devastating.
“I’d like to thank them for their bravery in telling their stories so that these callous criminals could be brought to justice.”
Mr Fleming said he is speaking out to prevent other people from falling for similar scams.
“However smooth and nice they seem, they’re not,” he said.
“The nicer they seem, the worse they are.
“A lot of people I know didn’t cope, and it must have been terrible for them because their lives have been ruined.

If you have been watching Bank of China’s stock, you are not alone. Whether you are considering buying in, holding, or wondering if it is time to lock in some profits, the last few years have given you plenty to think about. With share prices rising more than 23.8% in the past year and an outstanding 163.2% over the last five years, Bank of China has outperformed many expectations. Just this past week, shares nudged up another 2.6%, echoing a positive sentiment that has been building among investors.
Some of this optimism is tied to ongoing global financial shifts, where Chinese banks are seeing stronger capital inflows and a broad wave of strategic government support. Recent headlines highlight regulatory efforts aimed at reinforcing the stability of major banks, and Bank of China stands to benefit from both its size and its international footprint. These factors are changing how many investors perceive risk in the Chinese banking sector. They are also making those return numbers even more interesting.
With a value score of 5 out of a possible 6 checks for undervaluation, Bank of China already looks compelling compared to its peers. Next, let’s break down how that score came together using classic valuation approaches. As you will see, there may be an even more insightful way to look at the company’s worth.
Why Bank of China is lagging behind its peers
The Excess Returns valuation model measures how much return a company generates above the cost of its equity. This makes it a useful way to assess whether shareholders are getting a worthwhile reward for their investment risk. For Bank of China, this approach focuses on several key metrics drawn from forward-looking analyst expectations and historical performance.
Currently, Bank of China has a book value of HK$8.19 per share and a stable earnings per share (EPS) estimate of HK$0.75, based on a consensus of 14 analysts. The cost of equity is calculated at HK$0.78 per share, resulting in a modest excess return of HK$-0.02 per share. The company’s average return on equity is a solid 8.26%, with forecasts projecting a stable book value moving up to HK$9.11 per share, sourced from 11 analyst estimates.
Applying the Excess Returns model to these figures suggests an intrinsic value significantly higher than the current market price. The model estimates Bank of China’s stock to be approximately 53.8% undervalued. This result suggests the market may be underestimating the company’s capacity to generate returns on equity, especially relative to its peers and the industry average.

Bank Polska Kasa Opieki has recently seen a slight decrease in its consensus analyst price target, shifting from PLN 210.03 to PLN 207.78. This change comes as analysts weigh the bank’s robust historical revenue growth and stable asset quality, while also considering uncertainties brought on by evolving market conditions. Stay tuned to discover how you can continue monitoring key updates and shifts in the bank’s investment outlook.
Recent analyst activity reflects a reassessment of Bank Polska Kasa Opieki’s stock, factoring in both the company’s historical strengths and shifting market sentiment.
🐂 Bullish Takeaways
Analysts have previously rewarded Bank Polska Kasa Opieki for strong execution, consistent historical growth in revenue, and maintaining stable asset quality.
Positive mentions have often cited disciplined cost control and transparency, which support the bank’s resilient operating profile.
Some analysts acknowledge that while upside potential exists, much of it may be priced in at current valuation levels. This warrants a more balanced view going forward.
🐻 Bearish Takeaways
Oddo BHF downgraded Bank Polska Kasa Opieki to Neutral from Outperform on October 22, 0025, assigning a price target of PLN 200. This signals a more cautious stance on near-term upside.
The downgrade reflects elevated concerns about the bank’s valuation and the potential that recent market optimism may have already been factored into the share price.
Do your thoughts align with the Bull or Bear Analysts? Perhaps you think there’s more to the story. Head to the Simply Wall St Community to discover more perspectives or begin writing your own Narrative!
Bank Polska Kasa Opieki S.A. has announced a Special/Extraordinary Shareholders Meeting, which will take place on November 6, 2025, at 10:00 Central European Standard Time. The gathering is expected to address key strategic decisions for the bank’s future.
Analyst consensus price targets for Bank Polska Kasa Opieki have slightly declined, reflecting both steady performance fundamentals and increased market uncertainty.
Recent shifts in analyst outlooks, including a rating downgrade from Oddo BHF, highlight a cautious approach to the bank’s medium-term prospects amid valuation and market sentiment concerns.
The consensus analyst price target has decreased slightly from PLN 210.03 to PLN 207.78.
The discount rate has edged up marginally from 9.44% to 9.45%.
The revenue growth expectation has risen from 1.99% to 2.68%.
The net profit margin has decreased from 41.04% to 40.38%.
The future P/E ratio has declined modestly from 10.61x to 10.46x.