The projected fair value for Phoenix Mecano is CHF769 based on 2 Stage Free Cash Flow to Equity
Phoenix Mecano is estimated to be 44% undervalued based on current share price of CHF434
Our fair value estimate is 56% higher than Phoenix Mecano’s analyst price target of €493
In this article we are going to estimate the intrinsic value of Phoenix Mecano AG (VTX:PMN) by taking the expected future cash flows and discounting them to their present value. The Discounted Cash Flow (DCF) model is the tool we will apply to do this. Before you think you won’t be able to understand it, just read on! It’s actually much less complex than you’d imagine.
Remember though, that there are many ways to estimate a company’s value, and a DCF is just one method. If you want to learn more about discounted cash flow, the rationale behind this calculation can be read in detail in the Simply Wall St analysis model.
Trump has pledged to “unleash” American oil and gas and these 15 US stocks have developments that are poised to benefit.
We use what is known as a 2-stage model, which simply means we have two different periods of growth rates for the company’s cash flows. Generally the first stage is higher growth, and the second stage is a lower growth phase. In the first stage we need to estimate the cash flows to the business over the next ten years. Where possible we use analyst estimates, but when these aren’t available we extrapolate the previous free cash flow (FCF) from the last estimate or reported value. We assume companies with shrinking free cash flow will slow their rate of shrinkage, and that companies with growing free cash flow will see their growth rate slow, over this period. We do this to reflect that growth tends to slow more in the early years than it does in later years.
Generally we assume that a dollar today is more valuable than a dollar in the future, so we discount the value of these future cash flows to their estimated value in today’s dollars:
2026
2027
2028
2029
2030
2031
2032
2033
2034
2035
Levered FCF (€, Millions)
€28.3m
€23.8m
€35.8m
€48.5m
€51.2m
€53.1m
€54.5m
€55.6m
€56.5m
€57.2m
Growth Rate Estimate Source
Analyst x2
Analyst x1
Analyst x1
Analyst x1
Analyst x1
Est @ 3.64%
Est @ 2.69%
Est @ 2.03%
Est @ 1.57%
Est @ 1.25%
Present Value (€, Millions) Discounted @ 7.0%
€26.4
€20.8
€29.3
€37.0
€36.6
€35.4
€34.0
€32.4
€30.8
€29.2
(“Est” = FCF growth rate estimated by Simply Wall St) Present Value of 10-year Cash Flow (PVCF) = €312m
The second stage is also known as Terminal Value, this is the business’s cash flow after the first stage. For a number of reasons a very conservative growth rate is used that cannot exceed that of a country’s GDP growth. In this case we have used the 5-year average of the 10-year government bond yield (0.5%) to estimate future growth. In the same way as with the 10-year ‘growth’ period, we discount future cash flows to today’s value, using a cost of equity of 7.0%.
Present Value of Terminal Value (PVTV)= TV / (1 + r)10= €887m÷ ( 1 + 7.0%)10= €452m
The total value, or equity value, is then the sum of the present value of the future cash flows, which in this case is €764m. The last step is to then divide the equity value by the number of shares outstanding. Relative to the current share price of CHF434, the company appears quite good value at a 44% discount to where the stock price trades currently. Remember though, that this is just an approximate valuation, and like any complex formula – garbage in, garbage out.
SWX:PMN Discounted Cash Flow January 18th 2026
We would point out that the most important inputs to a discounted cash flow are the discount rate and of course the actual cash flows. If you don’t agree with these result, have a go at the calculation yourself and play with the assumptions. The DCF also does not consider the possible cyclicality of an industry, or a company’s future capital requirements, so it does not give a full picture of a company’s potential performance. Given that we are looking at Phoenix Mecano as potential shareholders, the cost of equity is used as the discount rate, rather than the cost of capital (or weighted average cost of capital, WACC) which accounts for debt. In this calculation we’ve used 7.0%, which is based on a levered beta of 1.538. Beta is a measure of a stock’s volatility, compared to the market as a whole. We get our beta from the industry average beta of globally comparable companies, with an imposed limit between 0.8 and 2.0, which is a reasonable range for a stable business.
See our latest analysis for Phoenix Mecano
Strength
Weakness
Opportunity
Threat
Valuation is only one side of the coin in terms of building your investment thesis, and it shouldn’t be the only metric you look at when researching a company. It’s not possible to obtain a foolproof valuation with a DCF model. Instead the best use for a DCF model is to test certain assumptions and theories to see if they would lead to the company being undervalued or overvalued. If a company grows at a different rate, or if its cost of equity or risk free rate changes sharply, the output can look very different. Can we work out why the company is trading at a discount to intrinsic value? For Phoenix Mecano, we’ve put together three essential items you should look at:
Risks: As an example, we’ve found 1 warning sign for Phoenix Mecano that you need to consider before investing here.
Future Earnings: How does PMN’s growth rate compare to its peers and the wider market? Dig deeper into the analyst consensus number for the upcoming years by interacting with our free analyst growth expectation chart.
Other High Quality Alternatives: Do you like a good all-rounder? Explore our interactive list of high quality stocks to get an idea of what else is out there you may be missing!
PS. The Simply Wall St app conducts a discounted cash flow valuation for every stock on the SWX every day. If you want to find the calculation for other stocks just search here.
Have feedback on this article? Concerned about the content?Get in touch with us directly. Alternatively, email editorial-team (at) simplywallst.com.
This article by Simply Wall St is general in nature. We provide commentary based on historical data and analyst forecasts only using an unbiased methodology and our articles are not intended to be financial advice. It does not constitute a recommendation to buy or sell any stock, and does not take account of your objectives, or your financial situation. We aim to bring you long-term focused analysis driven by fundamental data. Note that our analysis may not factor in the latest price-sensitive company announcements or qualitative material. Simply Wall St has no position in any stocks mentioned.
You are battling the January blues and see a cheap deal on one of your socials for a two-week break in Spain during August. Better still, the price is £200 cheaper than elsewhere, possibly because the holiday is almost sold out.
When you text to confirm the details after making the payment, you are talked through the booking by a convincing contact.
Unfortunately, that will be the last you hear from the travel agent as they are criminals, and the advertisement was a fake set up to lure you in.
January is one of three months during the year – June and July being the others – when scammers ramp up their efforts to defraud people planning summer and winter breaks. This time of year is traditionally when holiday companies see a rush of bookings as people crave something to look forward to after Christmas.
Jim Winters, head of economic crime at Nationwide, says the building society sees a pick up in holiday scams at this time of year. Typically, people are drawn in by a social media ad, which is either a direct copy of a legitimate one from a reputable company, or created by AI.
“They’ll look at where the popular holiday destinations are, and if there’s one that is up and coming they’ll tailor the scam,” he says.
Nationwide said the average loss to people is about £3,500.
What it looks like
The hook is a credible-looking ad on social media for two weeks in the sun, or a winter break skiing. The reason it looks like the real thing is that it has probably been copied from a genuine travel site, however the price quoted will be significantly less than you might expect to pay.
Too good to be true holidays deals are just that. Most often they will take your hard-earned cash and leave you high and dry. Photograph: peangdao/Getty Images/iStockphoto
After clicking on the ad, you will be asked to fill in your details and then be contacted on a chat app, such as WhatsApp, later. Or you may be able to click through directly to the chat from the ad.
Winters explains: “The offer will look like a bargain, an incredibly good value holiday. They might even give you some time pressure – as in ‘this is a one-time only deal’ or ‘you’ve got to sign up to it in the next 24 hours to qualify for this price’, and ‘we’ve only got x amount of tickets at this amount’.”
The fraudsters will ask for payment through bank transfer, and then, typically, cease contact, although some will still answer inquiries to lend some sort of legitimacy to the fraud. But, ultimately, the holiday does not exist.
What to do
When booking a holiday, make sure that you start the process on a reputable website, and not via a chat app. A good tip is to check the URL of the site in your browser. Be aware of the tactics of criminals. Urgency, and the fear of missing out on a deal, are big ploys to make victims act quickly and without thinking through decisions.
“Fraudsters know when peak periods are,” says Winters. “They know when people will be shopping for holidays. And, crucially, they know when they’ll be vulnerable to ‘too good to be true’ offers.”
Being asked to pay via bank transfer is a significant red flag as you will not have the section 75 protections that come with using a credit card.
If you think you have been defrauded, contact your bank immediately. After that, contact Action Fraud, the central hub for fraud and online crime.
Your guide to what Trump’s second term means for Washington, business and the world
European institutions are increasingly pushing into private markets to help mitigate “a new regime of higher volatility”, BlackRock has said, as it rapidly expands its own activity in the sector.
Dominik Rohé, deputy head of international business at the world’s largest fund manager, said clients in Europe, the Middle East and Africa accounted for about 35 per cent of its private asset fundraising last year.
The amount raised from institutions in this region increased by more than 50 per cent in absolute terms from 2024, in a sign of the fast-growing adoption of private assets in this market.
Rohé said institutions in Europe such as pension funds have been shifting away from public equities and bonds towards private assets, partly to manage market turbulence and to find investments whose returns were not correlated with movements in stock or bond markets.
“European institutions are allocating more to private markets as they recognise that we are in a new regime with higher volatility and different correlations between bonds and equities,” he told the FT.
BlackRock’s Dominik Rohé said private markets ‘can be more opaque to evaluate’ and warned investors to be mindful
BlackRock has bought three firms — infrastructure investment group Global Infrastructure Partners, private investment firm HPS Investment Partners and data provider Preqin — to fuel its expansion in the sector over the past two years. It is targeting $400bn in private market fundraising by 2030.
The private markets sector has grown rapidly as investors have been attracted to an asset class that is viewed as less volatile because it is priced less frequently than public markets. But private markets can be more opaque and the less frequent valuation process can pose a risk for investors.
Geopolitical tensions and policy uncertainty pushed up volatility last year, including a sharp sell-off in equity markets in the wake of US President Donald Trump’s “liberation day” tariffs, even as equities reached all-time highs.
Institutions “also see the opportunity to achieve early and diversified access through private markets into areas that are driving the economy, such as the infrastructure that will support the growth of AI as well as cash flowing businesses that have chosen to stay private for longer”, Rohé said.
BlackRock this week reported strong inflows into its fast-growing private markets unit, with the private credit business attracting $7.2bn and its infrastructure investment unit drawing in close to $5bn in three months.
BlackRock has amassed $322.6bn of assets under management in private markets. Total assets under management climbed to a record of $14tn, driven by its equity and fixed-income business.
Rohé said that private markets “can be more opaque to evaluate” and warned investors to be mindful of some of the liquidity challenges posed by private assets that can be harder to value and sell.
He added that across the EU and UK, more than 90 per cent of companies with annual revenue of over $100mn are privately held.
Suppliers of parts for Nvidia’s H200 have paused production after Chinese customs officials blocked shipments of the newly approved artificial intelligence processors from entering China, according to a report.
Reuters could not immediately verify the report, which appeared in the Financial Times citing two people with knowledge of the matter. Nvidia did not immediately respond to a Reuters request for comment made outside regular business hours.
Nvidia had expected more than one million orders from Chinese clients, the report said, adding that its suppliers had been operating around the clock to prepare for shipping as early as March.
Chinese customs authorities this week told customs agents that Nvidia’s H200 chips were not permitted to enter the country, Reuters reported.
Sources have also said government officials summoned domestic tech firms to warn them against buying the chips unless it was necessary.
The sources, who spoke on condition of anonymity due to the sensitivity of the matter, said authorities had not provided any reasons for their directives and had not given any indication if this was a formal ban or a temporary measure.
The H200, Nvidia’s second most powerful AI chip, is one of the biggest flashpoints in US-Sino relations. There is strong demand from Chinese firms, but it remains unclear if Beijing wants to ban the chips outright to encourage domestic chip companies to develop their own; whether the Chinese government is still mulling restrictions; or if it is all a bargaining tactic.
If the import ban is confirmed, it adds to a convoluted situation that includes the Trump administration allowing the US-designed, Taiwanese-manufactured H200 chips to be exported to China, with the US government reportedly to take a share of the profits.
The US government then decreed that instead of the completed chips being sent directly to China from Taiwan, they instead first go to a US laboratory for testing, allowing a 25% tariff to be imposed as they pass through the US. The tariff was also applied to chipmaker AMD’s MI325X processor.
Experts and analysts are split on whether selling the H200 to China is strategically a good idea. Those in favour say its availability might slow China’s progress developing similar chips and keep Chinese companies dependent on US technology; those against say the H200 is, for example, powerful enough to be used in weapons systems that China’s military might one day deploy against the US or its allies.
Using the 2 Stage Free Cash Flow to Equity, AirAsia X Berhad fair value estimate is RM1.64
With RM1.67 share price, AirAsia X Berhad appears to be trading close to its estimated fair value
Industry average of 58% suggests AirAsia X Berhad’s peers are currently trading at a higher premium to fair value
Does the January share price for AirAsia X Berhad (KLSE:AAX) reflect what it’s really worth? Today, we will estimate the stock’s intrinsic value by taking the forecast future cash flows of the company and discounting them back to today’s value. We will use the Discounted Cash Flow (DCF) model on this occasion. Before you think you won’t be able to understand it, just read on! It’s actually much less complex than you’d imagine.
Remember though, that there are many ways to estimate a company’s value, and a DCF is just one method. For those who are keen learners of equity analysis, the Simply Wall St analysis model here may be something of interest to you.
This technology could replace computers: discover the 20 stocks are working to make quantum computing a reality.
We use what is known as a 2-stage model, which simply means we have two different periods of growth rates for the company’s cash flows. Generally the first stage is higher growth, and the second stage is a lower growth phase. To start off with, we need to estimate the next ten years of cash flows. Where possible we use analyst estimates, but when these aren’t available we extrapolate the previous free cash flow (FCF) from the last estimate or reported value. We assume companies with shrinking free cash flow will slow their rate of shrinkage, and that companies with growing free cash flow will see their growth rate slow, over this period. We do this to reflect that growth tends to slow more in the early years than it does in later years.
Generally we assume that a dollar today is more valuable than a dollar in the future, so we need to discount the sum of these future cash flows to arrive at a present value estimate:
2026
2027
2028
2029
2030
2031
2032
2033
2034
2035
Levered FCF (MYR, Millions)
RM464.8m
RM444.8m
RM437.1m
RM436.7m
RM441.3m
RM449.5m
RM460.3m
RM473.2m
RM487.7m
RM503.6m
Growth Rate Estimate Source
Analyst x1
Analyst x1
Est @ -1.72%
Est @ -0.09%
Est @ 1.05%
Est @ 1.85%
Est @ 2.41%
Est @ 2.80%
Est @ 3.07%
Est @ 3.26%
Present Value (MYR, Millions) Discounted @ 11%
RM420
RM364
RM323
RM292
RM267
RM246
RM228
RM212
RM197
RM184
(“Est” = FCF growth rate estimated by Simply Wall St) Present Value of 10-year Cash Flow (PVCF) = RM2.7b
We now need to calculate the Terminal Value, which accounts for all the future cash flows after this ten year period. For a number of reasons a very conservative growth rate is used that cannot exceed that of a country’s GDP growth. In this case we have used the 5-year average of the 10-year government bond yield (3.7%) to estimate future growth. In the same way as with the 10-year ‘growth’ period, we discount future cash flows to today’s value, using a cost of equity of 11%.
Present Value of Terminal Value (PVTV)= TV / (1 + r)10= RM7.6b÷ ( 1 + 11%)10= RM2.8b
The total value, or equity value, is then the sum of the present value of the future cash flows, which in this case is RM5.5b. The last step is to then divide the equity value by the number of shares outstanding. Relative to the current share price of RM1.7, the company appears around fair value at the time of writing. The assumptions in any calculation have a big impact on the valuation, so it is better to view this as a rough estimate, not precise down to the last cent.
KLSE:AAX Discounted Cash Flow January 18th 2026
Now the most important inputs to a discounted cash flow are the discount rate, and of course, the actual cash flows. Part of investing is coming up with your own evaluation of a company’s future performance, so try the calculation yourself and check your own assumptions. The DCF also does not consider the possible cyclicality of an industry, or a company’s future capital requirements, so it does not give a full picture of a company’s potential performance. Given that we are looking at AirAsia X Berhad as potential shareholders, the cost of equity is used as the discount rate, rather than the cost of capital (or weighted average cost of capital, WACC) which accounts for debt. In this calculation we’ve used 11%, which is based on a levered beta of 1.150. Beta is a measure of a stock’s volatility, compared to the market as a whole. We get our beta from the industry average beta of globally comparable companies, with an imposed limit between 0.8 and 2.0, which is a reasonable range for a stable business.
See our latest analysis for AirAsia X Berhad
Strength
Weakness
Opportunity
Threat
Although the valuation of a company is important, it is only one of many factors that you need to assess for a company. It’s not possible to obtain a foolproof valuation with a DCF model. Instead the best use for a DCF model is to test certain assumptions and theories to see if they would lead to the company being undervalued or overvalued. For example, changes in the company’s cost of equity or the risk free rate can significantly impact the valuation. For AirAsia X Berhad, we’ve put together three relevant elements you should look at:
Risks: For example, we’ve discovered 2 warning signs for AirAsia X Berhad (1 is significant!) that you should be aware of before investing here.
Future Earnings: How does AAX’s growth rate compare to its peers and the wider market? Dig deeper into the analyst consensus number for the upcoming years by interacting with our free analyst growth expectation chart.
Other Solid Businesses: Low debt, high returns on equity and good past performance are fundamental to a strong business. Why not explore our interactive list of stocks with solid business fundamentals to see if there are other companies you may not have considered!
PS. Simply Wall St updates its DCF calculation for every Malaysian stock every day, so if you want to find the intrinsic value of any other stock just search here.
Have feedback on this article? Concerned about the content?Get in touch with us directly. Alternatively, email editorial-team (at) simplywallst.com.
This article by Simply Wall St is general in nature. We provide commentary based on historical data and analyst forecasts only using an unbiased methodology and our articles are not intended to be financial advice. It does not constitute a recommendation to buy or sell any stock, and does not take account of your objectives, or your financial situation. We aim to bring you long-term focused analysis driven by fundamental data. Note that our analysis may not factor in the latest price-sensitive company announcements or qualitative material. Simply Wall St has no position in any stocks mentioned.
Never miss an important update on your stock portfolio and cut through the noise. Over 7 million investors trust Simply Wall St to stay informed where it matters for FREE.
If you are wondering whether Compass Minerals International’s recent share price makes sense, you are not alone. This article is here to help you size up what that price might be offering you.
The stock last closed at US$23.29, with returns of 2.5% over 7 days, 22.9% over 30 days, 17.3% year to date, 63.9% over 1 year, compared with declines of 47.0% over 3 years and 59.7% over 5 years.
Recent coverage has focused on how the share price and long term return profile compare with the company’s fundamentals and peers. This helps frame whether the current level lines up with its underlying business. This context is useful as we assess whether the recent rebound sits on solid footing or still leaves questions about longer term value.
Compass Minerals International currently has a valuation score of 2 out of 6, based on how many of our checks suggest the stock looks undervalued. We will look at what different valuation methods say about that score and finish by considering a more complete way to think about value beyond the headline metrics.
Compass Minerals International scores just 2/6 on our valuation checks. See what other red flags we found in the full valuation breakdown.
A Discounted Cash Flow, or DCF, model estimates what a company might be worth today by projecting its future cash flows and then discounting those back to a present value.
For Compass Minerals International, the model uses a 2 Stage Free Cash Flow to Equity approach based on cash flow projections. The company’s last twelve month free cash flow is about $79.7 million. Analysts provide estimates for the next few years, and Simply Wall St then extends those to a 10 year view. Within those projections, free cash flow for 2026 is set at $55.5 million and for 2027 at $47.7 million, with further years extrapolated, reaching $42.1 million by 2035 on a discounted basis of $15.6 million.
Combining all projected and discounted cash flows, the model arrives at an estimated intrinsic value of about $11.78 per share. Compared with the recent share price of US$23.29, this implies the stock is 97.7% overvalued according to this specific DCF framework.
Result: OVERVALUED
Our Discounted Cash Flow (DCF) analysis suggests Compass Minerals International may be overvalued by 97.7%. Discover 871 undervalued stocks or create your own screener to find better value opportunities.
CMP Discounted Cash Flow as at Jan 2026
Head to the Valuation section of our Company Report for more details on how we arrive at this Fair Value for Compass Minerals International.
For companies where sales are a more stable reference point than earnings, the P/S ratio can be a useful way to think about what you are paying for each dollar of revenue.
What counts as a reasonable P/S multiple usually reflects how the market views a company’s growth potential and risk profile. Higher expected growth and lower perceived risk tend to support higher multiples, while slower expected growth or higher risk often line up with lower ones.
Compass Minerals International currently trades on a P/S of 0.78x. That sits well below the Metals and Mining industry average P/S of 3.16x and also below the peer average of 9.84x that Simply Wall St tracks for this group. On headline comparisons alone, the stock screens as cheaper than both its sector and similar companies on a sales basis.
Simply Wall St’s Fair Ratio takes this a step further. It estimates what a more tailored P/S might look like, based on factors such as earnings growth, industry, profit margins, market cap and company specific risks. Because it adjusts for these elements, it can be more informative than raw peer or industry comparisons.
For Compass Minerals International, the Fair Ratio is 0.61x versus the current 0.78x. That gap points to the shares looking overvalued relative to this customised benchmark.
Result: OVERVALUED
NYSE:CMP P/S Ratio as at Jan 2026
P/S ratios tell one story, but what if the real opportunity lies elsewhere? Discover 1442 companies where insiders are betting big on explosive growth.
Earlier we mentioned that there is an even better way to understand valuation. Let us introduce you to Narratives, which are simply your story about Compass Minerals International. A Narrative links your assumptions for future revenue, earnings, margins and fair value to a clear financial forecast that you can compare with today’s share price. All of this is available within an easy tool on Simply Wall St’s Community page that updates automatically when new earnings or news arrive. This allows you to see in real time whether your Fair Value suggests the shares look more attractive or less attractive than the current US$23.29 price. You can also see how other investors frame the same stock. For example, some may build a Narrative around the US$20.75 fair value and modest revenue growth and margin assumptions, while others use more cautious or more optimistic inputs, giving you a range of perspectives to weigh against your own view.
Do you think there’s more to the story for Compass Minerals International? Head over to our Community to see what others are saying!
NYSE:CMP 1-Year Stock Price Chart
This article by Simply Wall St is general in nature. We provide commentary based on historical data and analyst forecasts only using an unbiased methodology and our articles are not intended to be financial advice. It does not constitute a recommendation to buy or sell any stock, and does not take account of your objectives, or your financial situation. We aim to bring you long-term focused analysis driven by fundamental data. Note that our analysis may not factor in the latest price-sensitive company announcements or qualitative material. Simply Wall St has no position in any stocks mentioned.
Companies discussed in this article include CMP.
Have feedback on this article? Concerned about the content? Get in touch with us directly. Alternatively, email editorial-team@simplywallst.com
Significant control over Amway (Malaysia) Holdings Berhad by private companies implies that the general public has more power to influence management and governance-related decisions
The largest shareholder of the company is Alticor Global Holdings Inc. with a 52% stake
Institutional ownership in Amway (Malaysia) Holdings Berhad is 33%
AI is about to change healthcare. These 20 stocks are working on everything from early diagnostics to drug discovery. The best part – they are all under $10bn in marketcap – there is still time to get in early.
If you want to know who really controls Amway (Malaysia) Holdings Berhad (KLSE:AMWAY), then you’ll have to look at the makeup of its share registry. The group holding the most number of shares in the company, around 52% to be precise, is private companies. In other words, the group stands to gain the most (or lose the most) from their investment into the company.
And institutions on the other hand have a 33% ownership in the company. Generally speaking, as a company grows, institutions will increase their ownership. Conversely, insiders often decrease their ownership over time.
Let’s delve deeper into each type of owner of Amway (Malaysia) Holdings Berhad, beginning with the chart below.
See our latest analysis for Amway (Malaysia) Holdings Berhad
KLSE:AMWAY Ownership Breakdown January 18th 2026
Institutional investors commonly compare their own returns to the returns of a commonly followed index. So they generally do consider buying larger companies that are included in the relevant benchmark index.
We can see that Amway (Malaysia) Holdings Berhad does have institutional investors; and they hold a good portion of the company’s stock. This can indicate that the company has a certain degree of credibility in the investment community. However, it is best to be wary of relying on the supposed validation that comes with institutional investors. They too, get it wrong sometimes. It is not uncommon to see a big share price drop if two large institutional investors try to sell out of a stock at the same time. So it is worth checking the past earnings trajectory of Amway (Malaysia) Holdings Berhad, (below). Of course, keep in mind that there are other factors to consider, too.
KLSE:AMWAY Earnings and Revenue Growth January 18th 2026
Amway (Malaysia) Holdings Berhad is not owned by hedge funds. Alticor Global Holdings Inc. is currently the company’s largest shareholder with 52% of shares outstanding. With such a huge stake in the ownership, we infer that they have significant control of the future of the company. In comparison, the second and third largest shareholders hold about 19% and 8.6% of the stock.
While studying institutional ownership for a company can add value to your research, it is also a good practice to research analyst recommendations to get a deeper understand of a stock’s expected performance. There is a little analyst coverage of the stock, but not much. So there is room for it to gain more coverage.
The definition of company insiders can be subjective and does vary between jurisdictions. Our data reflects individual insiders, capturing board members at the very least. The company management answer to the board and the latter should represent the interests of shareholders. Notably, sometimes top-level managers are on the board themselves.
Insider ownership is positive when it signals leadership are thinking like the true owners of the company. However, high insider ownership can also give immense power to a small group within the company. This can be negative in some circumstances.
We can see that insiders own shares in Amway (Malaysia) Holdings Berhad. As individuals, the insiders collectively own RM20m worth of the RM852m company. Some would say this shows alignment of interests between shareholders and the board. But it might be worth checking if those insiders have been selling.
The general public– including retail investors — own 12% stake in the company, and hence can’t easily be ignored. While this group can’t necessarily call the shots, it can certainly have a real influence on how the company is run.
It seems that Private Companies own 52%, of the Amway (Malaysia) Holdings Berhad stock. It might be worth looking deeper into this. If related parties, such as insiders, have an interest in one of these private companies, that should be disclosed in the annual report. Private companies may also have a strategic interest in the company.
It’s always worth thinking about the different groups who own shares in a company. But to understand Amway (Malaysia) Holdings Berhad better, we need to consider many other factors. Take risks for example – Amway (Malaysia) Holdings Berhad has 2 warning signs we think you should be aware of.
Ultimately the future is most important. You can access this free report on analyst forecasts for the company.
NB: Figures in this article are calculated using data from the last twelve months, which refer to the 12-month period ending on the last date of the month the financial statement is dated. This may not be consistent with full year annual report figures.
Have feedback on this article? Concerned about the content?Get in touch with us directly. Alternatively, email editorial-team (at) simplywallst.com.
This article by Simply Wall St is general in nature. We provide commentary based on historical data and analyst forecasts only using an unbiased methodology and our articles are not intended to be financial advice. It does not constitute a recommendation to buy or sell any stock, and does not take account of your objectives, or your financial situation. We aim to bring you long-term focused analysis driven by fundamental data. Note that our analysis may not factor in the latest price-sensitive company announcements or qualitative material. Simply Wall St has no position in any stocks mentioned.
Never miss an important update on your stock portfolio and cut through the noise. Over 7 million investors trust Simply Wall St to stay informed where it matters for FREE.
TOTO (TSE:5332) has been drawing attention after its recent share performance, with returns over the month and past 3 months outpacing its longer term 5 year record and prompting fresh interest in its plumbing fixtures business.
See our latest analysis for TOTO.
With the share price at ¥4,724 and a 30 day share price return of 11.60% feeding into a 7.71% year to date gain, recent momentum contrasts with a weaker 5 year total shareholder return of a 12.53% decline. This hints that sentiment around TOTO’s prospects has shifted more positively in the nearer term.
If this kind of renewed interest in established industrial names has your attention, it could be a good moment to see what else is moving through fast growing stocks with high insider ownership.
With the stock at ¥4,724, a value score of 1 and trading above an average analyst price target of ¥4,309, the key question is whether TOTO is still undervalued or if the market is already pricing in future growth.
TOTO is trading on a P/S of 1.1x, which sits above both its peer group and the broader Japan building industry despite the recent share price recovery.
The P/S ratio compares the company’s market value with its annual revenue, so it tells you how much investors are paying for each ¥ of sales in TOTO’s plumbing fixtures and related products business.
In TOTO’s case, the current 1.1x P/S is described as expensive compared to both the peer average of 1x and the Japan building industry average of 0.6x. At the same time, that 1.1x level is flagged as good value against an estimated fair P/S of 1.6x, a level the market could move toward if sentiment and fundamentals stay aligned.
Relative to the sector, the current P/S suggests investors are already paying a premium versus many building names, even though TOTO’s earnings profile has recently included a large one off loss and low return on equity.
Explore the SWS fair ratio for TOTO
Result: Price-to-Sales of 1.1x (ABOUT RIGHT)
However, you still need to weigh risks like TOTO’s recent large one off loss and low return on equity, which could potentially limit how much investors are willing to pay.
Find out about the key risks to this TOTO narrative.
While the 1.1x P/S ratio looks roughly in line with a fair ratio of 1.6x, our DCF model points in a different direction. On that basis, TOTO at ¥4,724 is described as trading above an estimated fair value of ¥3,460.5, which suggests less room for error if expectations slip.
Look into how the SWS DCF model arrives at its fair value.
5332 Discounted Cash Flow as at Jan 2026
Simply Wall St performs a discounted cash flow (DCF) on every stock in the world every day (check out TOTO for example). We show the entire calculation in full. You can track the result in your watchlist or portfolio and be alerted when this changes, or use our stock screener to discover 100+ undervalued stocks based on their cash flows. If you save a screener we even alert you when new companies match – so you never miss a potential opportunity.
If you see the story differently or prefer to lean on your own work, you can shape a fresh view in just a few minutes: Do it your way.
A great starting point for your TOTO research is our analysis highlighting 1 key reward and 3 important warning signs that could impact your investment decision.
If TOTO has sharpened your focus, do not stop here. The Screener can quickly surface other angles that might suit your watchlist and research style.
This article by Simply Wall St is general in nature. We provide commentary based on historical data and analyst forecasts only using an unbiased methodology and our articles are not intended to be financial advice. It does not constitute a recommendation to buy or sell any stock, and does not take account of your objectives, or your financial situation. We aim to bring you long-term focused analysis driven by fundamental data. Note that our analysis may not factor in the latest price-sensitive company announcements or qualitative material. Simply Wall St has no position in any stocks mentioned.
Companies discussed in this article include 5332.T.
Have feedback on this article? Concerned about the content? Get in touch with us directly. Alternatively, email editorial-team@simplywallst.com
Ji Seung-ryeol is being roasted online for his fashion
Ji Seung-ryeol, 41, prides himself on his sense of fashion.
He diligently shares mirror selfies on Instagram, where everyone knows the more likes you get, the cooler you are.
So he was bewildered to find out thatmen his age have become the subject of ridicule online, mocked for shoehorning their way into styles associated with Gen Z and younger millennials.
AI-generated caricatures of this demographic have gone viral on social media: a middle-aged man decked out in street wear and clutching an iPhone. The kids call them “Young 40s”.
The memes have made Ji’s beloved Nike Air Jordans and Stüssy T-shirts the butt of jokes—and the source of much indignation.
“I’m just buying and wearing things I’ve liked for a long time, now that I can afford them,” he tells the BBC. “Why is this something to be attacked for?”
The iPhone that started it all
Once celebrated as pioneers of taste in the 1990s, the tide of public opinion on 40-year-olds turned after the release of the iPhone 17 last September.
The smartphone, long considered the preserve of the youth, was suddenly recast as a tacky trademark of Young 40s. These are, in the words of Gen Z Jeong Ju-eun, people “trying too hard to look young”, who “refuse to accept that time has passed”.
The figures seem to reflect this shift. While the majority of young South Koreans still prefer the iPhone to the Samsung Galaxy, over the past year Apple’s market share fell by 4% among Gen Z consumers and rose 12% for people in their 40s, according to research by Gallup.
Something similar played out a few years back with Geriatric Millennials, born in the early ’80s, whose brand of humour—the crying-laughing emoji, finger moustaches and the word “adulting”—was derided as cringey.
Back then, debate over Geriatric Millennials sparked self-deprecating jokes, think pieces and quizzes dictating if you’re meant to pile on the ribbing or be subjected to it.
The same trends have taken hold in South Korea with Young 40s.
News1
The iPhone, long considered the preserve of young people, is now seen as a trademark of Young 40s
In Korea, age difference, even by a year, forms the basis of social hierarchy. Age is one of the first things strangers ask each other, setting the tone for future interactions: how they address one another, who gets to open the bottle of soju at parties (it’s usually the oldest person) and which way to tip your shot glass (the correct answer: away from your seniors).
But the Young 40 memes also represent Korean youth’s growing scepticism of this almost forced reverence for elders.
Just a few years ago, the term “kkondae” was another buzzword among young South Korean to describe an annoying breed of rigid, condescending elders.
Such friction has been exacerbated by social media, where “multiple generations mix within the same space”, says Lee Jae-in, a sociology professor at Korea University’s Sejong campus.
“The old pattern where different generations consumed separate cultural spaces has largely disappeared,” he adds.
A self-conscious sandwich generation
Popularised in marketing circles in the 2010s, the term “Young 40” originally referred to consumers with youthful sensibilities. They were health-conscious, active and comfortable with technology—an important target demographic for companies.
“In the past, people in their 40s were seen as already old,” says Kim Yong-Sup, a trend analyst widely credited with coining the term “Young 40”.
As the median age of South Korea’s society rose, however, these people were “no longer on the verge of old age but at the centre of society”, he says.
But the marketing term has since taken a viral, sardonic turn. Over the past year, “Young 40” was mentioned online more than 100,000 times – more than half the referenceswere used in a negative context, according to analytics platform SomeTrend. Many of them appeared alongside words like “old” and “disgusting”.
An offshoot of the meme is Sweet Young 40, a sarcastic label for middle-aged men who like to hit on young women.
Getty Images
Many South Korean youth face soaring house prices and cut-throat competition in the job market
Some see the jokes about Young 40s as a form of punching up: these are people at the peak of their careers, who amassed wealth in a time of economic stability and a property boom.
On the other side are Gen Z and young millennials, born a couple of decades later, who face soaring house prices and cut-throat competition in the job market. In their eyes, Young 40s represent “the generation that made it through just before the door of opportunity closed”, according to psychologist Oh Eun-kyung.
“They are seen not simply as individuals with personal tastes, but as symbols of privilege and power,” she says. “That’s why the energy of mockery is focused on them.”
But Ji, the 41-year-old fashion enthusiast who lived through the so-called golden era, tells a different version of that story.
As a young graduate entering the job market during the Asian financial crisis in the late 1990s, he remembers submitting around 70 applications to land a job. His generation is one that “had very little to enjoy growing up, and only began to enjoy things later, as adults”, he says.
Instagram/@detailance
Ji says he feels “caught in between” two generations
Now at the workplace, he often finds himself sandwiched between two worlds. The generation above him ran a “strict, top-down system where you did what you were told”, while below him is “a generation that asks ‘why””.
“We’re a generation that has experienced both cultures. We feel caught in between.”
While the ability to straddle two generations was once a badge of honour, Ji says he has become self-conscious about interacting with younger colleagues for fear of being labelled a kkondae or Young 40.
“These days, I hardly organise drinking gatherings,” he says. “I try to keep conversations focused on work or career concerns, and only share personal stories when discussions naturally deepen.”
According to Kang, another fashionable 41-year-old, sitting at the heart of the Young 40 meme is a deeply human desire.
“As you get older, longing for youth becomes completely natural. Wanting to look young is something every generation shares.”
Buying shares in the best businesses can build meaningful wealth for you and your family. While the best companies are hard to find, but they can generate massive returns over long periods. Just think about the savvy investors who held Channel Infrastructure NZ Limited (NZSE:CHI) shares for the last five years, while they gained 453%. And this is just one example of the epic gains achieved by some long term investors. Also pleasing for shareholders was the 13% gain in the last three months.
So let’s investigate and see if the longer term performance of the company has been in line with the underlying business’ progress.
Trump has pledged to “unleash” American oil and gas and these 15 US stocks have developments that are poised to benefit.
In his essay The Superinvestors of Graham-and-Doddsville Warren Buffett described how share prices do not always rationally reflect the value of a business. One way to examine how market sentiment has changed over time is to look at the interaction between a company’s share price and its earnings per share (EPS).
During the five years of share price growth, Channel Infrastructure NZ moved from a loss to profitability. Sometimes, the start of profitability is a major inflection point that can signal fast earnings growth to come, which in turn justifies very strong share price gains. Given that the company made a profit three years ago, but not five years ago, it is worth looking at the share price returns over the last three years, too. We can see that the Channel Infrastructure NZ share price is up 106% in the last three years. Meanwhile, EPS is up 77% per year. This EPS growth is higher than the 27% average annual increase in the share price over the same three years. So you might conclude the market is a little more cautious about the stock, these days.
You can see how EPS has changed over time in the image below (click on the chart to see the exact values).
NZSE:CHI Earnings Per Share Growth January 17th 2026
It is of course excellent to see how Channel Infrastructure NZ has grown profits over the years, but the future is more important for shareholders. It might be well worthwhile taking a look at our free report on how its financial position has changed over time.
As well as measuring the share price return, investors should also consider the total shareholder return (TSR). The TSR is a return calculation that accounts for the value of cash dividends (assuming that any dividend received was reinvested) and the calculated value of any discounted capital raisings and spin-offs. So for companies that pay a generous dividend, the TSR is often a lot higher than the share price return. We note that for Channel Infrastructure NZ the TSR over the last 5 years was 602%, which is better than the share price return mentioned above. This is largely a result of its dividend payments!
It’s nice to see that Channel Infrastructure NZ shareholders have received a total shareholder return of 60% over the last year. And that does include the dividend. That gain is better than the annual TSR over five years, which is 48%. Therefore it seems like sentiment around the company has been positive lately. In the best case scenario, this may hint at some real business momentum, implying that now could be a great time to delve deeper. I find it very interesting to look at share price over the long term as a proxy for business performance. But to truly gain insight, we need to consider other information, too. Take risks, for example – Channel Infrastructure NZ has 1 warning sign we think you should be aware of.
For those who like to find winning investments this free list of undervalued companies with recent insider purchasing, could be just the ticket.
Please note, the market returns quoted in this article reflect the market weighted average returns of stocks that currently trade on New Zealander exchanges.
Have feedback on this article? Concerned about the content?Get in touch with us directly. Alternatively, email editorial-team (at) simplywallst.com.
This article by Simply Wall St is general in nature. We provide commentary based on historical data and analyst forecasts only using an unbiased methodology and our articles are not intended to be financial advice. It does not constitute a recommendation to buy or sell any stock, and does not take account of your objectives, or your financial situation. We aim to bring you long-term focused analysis driven by fundamental data. Note that our analysis may not factor in the latest price-sensitive company announcements or qualitative material. Simply Wall St has no position in any stocks mentioned.