Category: 5. Entertainment

  • ‘Generations of women have been disfigured’: Jamie Lee Curtis lets rip on plastic surgery, power, and Hollywood’s age problem | Jamie Lee Curtis

    ‘Generations of women have been disfigured’: Jamie Lee Curtis lets rip on plastic surgery, power, and Hollywood’s age problem | Jamie Lee Curtis

    I’m scheduled to speak to Jamie Lee Curtis at 2pm UK time, and a few minutes before the allotted slot I dial in via video link, to be met with a vision of the 66-year-old actor sitting alone in a darkened room, staring impassively into the camera. “Morning,” she says, with comic flatness, as I make a sound of surprise that is definitely not a little scream.

    Oh, hi!! I say, Are you early or am I late?

    “I’m always early,” says the actor, deadpan. “Or as my elder daughter refers to me, ‘aggressively early’.”

    Curtis is in a plain black top, heavy black-framed glasses and – importantly for this conversation – little or no makeup, while behind her in the gloom, a dog sleeps in a basket. She won’t say what part of the US she’s in beyond the fact it’s a “witness protection cabin in the woods” where “I’m trying to have privacy” – an arch way, I assume, of saying she’s not in LA – and immediately starts itemising other situations in which she has been known to be early: Hollywood premieres (“They tell me I can’t go to the red carpet yet because it’s not open and so my driver, Cal, and I drive around and park in the shade”); early-morning text messages (“I wake people up”); even her work schedule: “I show up, do the work, and then I get the fuck out.”

    This is the short version; in full, the opening minutes of our conversation involve Curtis free-associating through references to the memory of her mother and stepfather missing her performance in a school musical in Connecticut; the negotiating aims of the makeup artists’ union; the nickname by which she would like to be known if she ever becomes a grandmother (“Fifo” – short for “first in first out”); and what, exactly, her earliness is about. Not, as you might imagine, anxiety, but: “You know, honestly, I’ve done enough analysis of all this – it’s control.” Curtis knows her early arrivals strike some people as rude. “My daughter Annie says: ‘People aren’t ready for you.’ And I basically say: ‘Well, that’s their problem. They should be ready.’”

    “That’s their problem” is, along with, “I don’t give a shit any more” a classic Curtis expression that goes a long way towards explaining why so many people love her – and they really do love her – a woman who on top of charming us for decades in a clutch of iconic roles, has crossed over, lately, into that paradoxical territory in which she is loved precisely because she’s done worrying about what others think of her. Specifically, she doesn’t care about the orthodoxies of an industry in which women are shamed into having cosmetic surgery before they hit 30. Curtis has spoken of having a procedure herself at 25, following a comment made on the set of a film that her eyes were “baggy”. Regretting it, she has in the years since made the genuinely outlandish and inspiring decision to wear her hair grey and eschew surgical tweaks. That Curtis is the child of two Hollywood icons, Tony Curtis and Janet Leigh, and thus an insider since birth, either makes this more surprising or else explains it entirely, but either way, she has become someone who appears to operate outside the usual Hollywood rules. “I have become quite brusque,” says Curtis, of people making demands on her time when she’s not open for business. “And I have no problem saying: ‘Back the fuck off.’”

    Photograph: Mary Rozzi/The Guardian

    I can believe it. During the course of our conversation, Curtis’s attitude – which is broadly charming, occasionally hectoring and appears to be driven by a general and sardonic belligerence – is that of someone pushing back against a lifetime of misconceptions, from which, four months shy of her 67th birthday, she finally feels herself to be free. Curtis is in a glorious phase of her career, one that, despite starring in huge hits – from the Halloween franchise and A Fish Called Wanda (1988) to Trading Places (1983), True Lies (1994) and the superlative Knives Out (2019) – has always eluded her. The fact is, celebrity aside, Curtis has never been considered a particularly heavyweight actor or been A-list in the conventional way. At its most trivial, this has required her to weather small slights, such as being ignored by the Women In Film community, with its tedious schedule of panels and events. (“I still exist outside of Women In Film,” she snaps. “They’re not asking me to their lunch.”) And, more broadly, has seen Curtis completely overlooked by the Oscars since she shot Halloween, her first movie, at the age of 19.

    With her Oscar for best supporting actress for 2022’s Everything Everywhere All at Once. Photograph: Angela Weiss/AFP/Getty Images

    Well, all that has changed now. In 2023, Curtis won an Oscar for best supporting actress for her role as Deirdre Beaubeirdre in the genre-bending movie Everything Everywhere All at Once. That same year, she appeared in a single episode of the multi-award-winning TV show The Bear as Donna Berzatto, the alcoholic mother of a large Italian clan – she calls it “the most exhilarating creative experience I will ever have”. Anyone who saw this extraordinary performance is still talking about it, and it led to a larger role on the show. Doors that had always been shut to Curtis flew open. For years, she had tried and failed to get movie and TV projects off the ground. Now, she lists the forthcoming projects she had a hand in bringing to the screen: “Freakier Friday, TV series Scarpetta, survival movie The Lost Bus, four other TV shows and two other movies.” She has become a “prolific producer”, she says, as well as a Hollywood elder and role model. All of which makes Curtis laugh – the fact that, finally, “at 66, I get to be a boss”. You’d better believe she’ll be making the most of it.


    The movie Curtis and I are ostensibly here to talk about is Freakier Friday, the follow-up to Freaky Friday, the monster Disney hit of 2003 in which Curtis and Lindsay Lohan appeared as a mother and daughter who switch bodies with hilarious consequences. I defy anyone who enjoyed the first film not to feel both infinitely aged by revisiting the cast more than 20 years on, and also not to find it a wildly enjoyable return. The teenage Lohan of the first movie is now a 37-year-old mother of 15-year-old Harper, played by Julia Butters, while the introduction of a second teenager – Harper’s mortal enemy Lily, played by Sophia Hammons – allows for a four-way body swap in which Curtis-as-grandma is inhabited by Hammons’ British wannabe influencer. If it lacks the simplicity of the first movie, I thoroughly enjoyed it and look forward to taking my 10-year-old girls when it opens next month.

    As a baby with parents Tony Curtis and Janet Leigh and sister Kelly, 1959. Photograph: Donaldson Collection/Getty Images

    It is also a movie that presented Curtis with an odd set of challenges. She has a problem with “pretty”. When Curtis herself was a teenager, she says, she was “cute but not pretty”. She watched both her parents’ careers atrophy after their youthful good looks started to wane. Part of her shtick around earliness is an almost existential refusal to live on Hollywood’s timeline, because, she says: “I witnessed my parents lose the very thing that gave them their fame and their life and their livelihood, when the industry rejected them at a certain age. I watched them reach incredible success and then have it slowly erode to where it was gone. And that’s very painful.”

    As a result, says Curtis: “I have been self-retiring for 30 years. I have been prepping to get out, so that I don’t have to suffer the same as my family did. I want to leave the party before I’m no longer invited.” In the movie, Curtis was allowed to keep her grey hair (although it looks shot through with blond) but her trademark pixie cut was replaced with something longer and softer. I take it with a pinch when she says things such as, “I’m an old lady” and, “I’m going to die soon” – even in age-hating Hollywood, this seems overegged – but one takes the point that she found the conventional aesthetic demands of Freakier Friday, in which she “had to look pretty, I had to pay attention to [flattering] lighting, and clothes and hair and makeup and nails”, much harder than playing a dishevelled alcoholic in The Bear.

    In Halloween, 1978. Photograph: Archive Photos/Getty Images

    On the other hand, Curtis is a pro and, of course, gave Disney the full-throated, zany-but-still-kinda-hot grandma they wanted. (There is a scene in which she tries to explain various board games – Boggle, Parcheesi – to the owl-eyed teens that reminds you just how fine a comic actor she is.) It’s the story of how Freakier Friday came about, however, that really gives insight into who Curtis is: an absolute, indefatigable and inveterate hustler. “I am owning my hustle, now,” she says and is at her most impressive, her most charming and energised when she is talking about the hustle.

    To wit: Curtis was on a world tour promoting the Halloween franchise that made her name and that enjoyed a hugely successful reboot in 2018, when something about the crowd response struck her. “In every single city I went to, the only movie they asked me about besides Halloween was Freaky Friday – was there going to be a sequel?” When she got back from the tour, she called Bob Iger, Disney’s CEO. “I said: ‘Look, I don’t know if you’re planning on doing [a sequel], but Lindsay is old enough to have a teenager now, and I’m telling you the market for that movie exists.’”

    As the project came together, Curtis learned that Disney was planning to release Freakier Friday straight to streaming. “And I called Bob Iger” – it’s at this point you start to imagine Iger seeing Curtis’s name flash up on his phone and experiencing a slight drop in spirits – “and I called David Greenbaum [Disney Live Action president], and I called Asad Ayaz, who’s the head of marketing, and I said: ‘Guys, I have one word for you: Barbie. If you don’t think the audience that saw Barbie is going to be the audience that goes and sees Freakier Friday, you’re wrong.’”

    This is what Curtis means when she refers to herself as “a marketing person”, or “a weapon of mass promotion”, and she has done it for ever. It’s what she did in 2002 when she lobbied More magazine to let her pose in her underwear and no makeup – “They didn’t come to me and say: ‘Hey Jamie, how about you take off your clothes and show America that you’re chubby?’ The More magazine thing happened because I said it should happen, and I even titled the piece: True Thighs.”

    And it is what she was doing a few weeks before our interview when she turned up to the photoshoot in LA bearing a bunch of props she had ordered from Amazon, including oversized plastic lips and a blond wig. Curtis says: “There are many, many actresses who love the dress up, who love clothes, who love fashion, who love being a model. I. Hate. It. I feel like I am having to wrestle with your idea of me versus my idea of me. Because I’ve worked hard to establish who I am, and I don’t want you to … I have struggled with it my whole life.”

    Portraits: Mary Rozzi/The Guardian

    Curtis is emphatic that her ideas be accurately interpreted and, before our meeting, sent an email via her publicist explaining her thinking behind the shoot. “The wax lips is my statement against plastic surgery. I’ve been very vocal about the genocide of a generation of women by the cosmeceutical industrial complex, who’ve disfigured themselves. The wax lips really sends it home.”

    Obviously, the word “genocide” is very strong and risks causing offence, given its proper meaning. To Curtis, however, it is accurate. “I’ve used that word for a long time and I use it specifically because it’s a strong word. I believe that we have wiped out a generation or two of natural human [appearance]. The concept that you can alter the way you look through chemicals, surgical procedures, fillers – there’s a disfigurement of generations of predominantly women who are altering their appearances. And it is aided and abetted by AI, because now the filter face is what people want. I’m not filtered right now. The minute I lay a filter on and you see the before and after, it’s hard not to go: ‘Oh, well that looks better.’ But what’s better? Better is fake. And there are too many examples – I will not name them – but very recently we have had a big onslaught through media, many of those people.”

    Well, at the risk of sounding harsh, one of the people implicated by Curtis’s criticism is Lindsay Lohan, her Freakier Friday co-star and a woman in her late 30s who has seemingly had a lot of cosmetic procedures at a startlingly young age (though Lohan denies having had surgery). In terms of mentoring Lohan, with whom Curtis remained friends after making the first film, she says: “I’m bossy, very bossy, but I try to mind my own business. She doesn’t need my advice. She’s a fully functioning, smart woman, creative person. Privately, she’s asked me questions, but nothing that’s more than an older friend you might ask.”

    But given the stridency of Curtis’s position on cosmetic surgery, don’t younger women feel judged in her presence? Isn’t it awkward? “No. No. Because I don’t care. It doesn’t matter. I’m not proselytising to them. I would never say a word. I would never say to someone: what have you done? All I know is that it is a never-ending cycle. That, I know. Once you start, you can’t stop. But it’s not my job to give my opinion; it’s none of my business.”

    As for Lohan, Curtis says: “I felt tremendous maternal care for Lindsay after the first movie, and continued to feel that. When she’d come to LA, I would see her. She and I have remained friends, and now we’re sort of colleagues. I feel less maternal towards her because she’s a mommy now herself and doesn’t need my maternal care, and has, obviously, a mom – Dina’s a terrific grandma.”

    skip past newsletter promotion

    The general point about the horror of trying to stay young via surgery is sensible and, of course, I agree. At the back of my mind, however, I have a small, pinging reservation that I can’t quite put my finger on. I suggest to Curtis that she has natural advantages by virtue of being a movie star, which, on the one hand, of course, makes her more vulnerable around issues of ageing, but on the other hand, she’s naturally beautiful and everyone loves her, and most average women who –

    “I have short grey hair!” she protests. “Other women can –”

    They can, of course! But you must have a physical confidence that falls outside the normal –

    “No! No!” She won’t have it. “I feel like you’re trying to say: ‘You’re in some rarefied air, Jamie.’” I’m not! She responds: “By the way, genetics – you can’t fuck with genetics. You want to know where my genetics lie?” She lifts up an arm and wobbles her bingo wings at me. “Are you kidding me? By the way, you’re not going to see a picture of me in a tank top, ever.” This is Curtis’s red line. “I wear long-sleeve shirts; that’s just common sense.” She gives me a beady look. “I challenge you that I’m in some rarefied air.”

    I think about this afterwards to try and clarify my objection, which I guess is this: that the main reason women in middle age dye their hair is to stave off invisibility, which, with the greatest respect, is not among the veteran movie star’s problems. But it’s a minor quibble given what I genuinely believe is Curtis’s helpful and iconoclastic gesture.

    And when she talks about cosmetic surgery as addiction, she should know. Curtis was an alcoholic until she got sober at 40 and is emphatic and impressive on this subject, the current poster woman – literally: she’s on signs across LA for an addiction charity with the tagline: “My bravest thing? Getting sober”. I’m curious about how her intense need for control worked, in those years long ago, alongside her addiction?

    With her mother Janet Leigh in LA, 1979. Photograph: Ron Galella Collection/Getty Images

    “I am a controlled addict,” she says. “In recovery we talk about how, in order to start recovering, you have to hit what you call a ‘bottom’. You have to crash and burn, lose yourself and your family and your job and your resources in order to know that the way you were living didn’t work. I refer to myself as an Everest bottom; I am the highest bottom I know. When I acknowledged my lack of control, I was in a very controlled state. I lost none of the external aspects of my life. The only thing I had lost was my own sense of myself and self-esteem.”

    Photograph: Mary Rozzi/The Guardian

    Externally, during those years of addiction, she seemed to be doing very well. Her career boomed. She married Christopher Guest, the actor, screenwriter and director, and they have two children and have stayed married for more than 40 years. (There’s no miracle to this. As Curtis puts it, wryly: “It’s just that we have chosen to stay married. And be married people. And we love each other. And I believe we respect each other. And I’m sure there’s a little bit of hatred in there, too.”) I wonder, then, whether Curtis’s success during those years disguised how serious a situation she was in with her addiction?

    “There’s no one way to be an addict or an alcoholic. People hide things – I was lucky, and I am ambitious, and so I never let that self-medication get in the way of my ambition or work or creativity. It never bled through. No one would ever have said that had been an issue for me.”

    Where was the cost?

    “The external costs are awful for people; but the internal costs are more sinister and deadly, because to understand that you are powerless over something other than your own mind and creativity is something. But that was a long time ago. I’m an old lady now.”

    She is doing better than ever. With the Oscar under her belt, Curtis has just returned in the new season of The Bear and has a slew of projects – many developed with Jason Blum, the veteran horror producer with whom she has a development deal – coming down the line. Watching her bravura performance as Donna Berzatto, I did wonder if playing an alcoholic had been in any way traumatic. She flashes me a look of pure vehemence. “Here’s what’s traumatic: not being able to express your range as an artist. That’s traumatic. To spend your entire public life holding back range. And depth. And complexity. And contradiction. And rage. And pain. And sorrow.” She builds momentum: “And to have been limited to a much smaller palette of creative, emotional work.

    As Donna Berzatto, the alcoholic mother of a large Italian clan, in The Bear. Photograph: FX

    “For me, it was an unleashing of 50 years of being a performer who was never considered to have any range. And so the freedom, and the confidence, that I was given by Chris [Storer, the show’s creator], and the writing, which leads you … everywhere you need to go – it was exhilarating.” She continues: “It took no toll. The toll has been 40 years of holding back something I know is here.”

    Well, there she is, the Curtis who thrills and inspires. Among the many new projects is The Lost Bus, a survival disaster movie for AppleTV+ about a bus full of children trying to escape wildfires. The idea came to Curtis while she was driving on the freeway, listening to an NPR report on the deadly wildfires of 2018 in the small town of Paradise, California. She pulled over and called Blum; the movie, directed by Paul Greengrass and starring Matthew McConaughey and America Ferrera, drops later this year. For another project, she managed to persuade Patricia Cornwell, the superstar thriller writer, to release the rights for her Scarpetta series, which, as well as producing, Curtis will star in alongside Nicole Kidman.

    This burst of activity is something Curtis ascribes to the “freedom” she derived from losing “all vanity”, and over the course of our conversation “freedom” is the word she most frequently uses to describe what she values in life. Freedom is a particularly loaded and precious concept for those on the other side of addiction and, says Curtis, “I have dead relatives; I have parents who both had issues with drinking and drugs. I have a dead sibling. I have numerous friends who never found the freedom, which is really the goal – right? Freedom.”

    With husband Christopher Guest and daughters Ruby and Annie. Photograph: Caroline Brehman/EPA-EFE/ Shutterstock

    It’s a principle that also extends to her family. Curtis’s daughter Ruby, 29, is trans, and I ask how insulated they are from Donald Trump’s aggressively anti-trans policies. “I want to be careful because I protect my family,” says Curtis. “I’m an outspoken advocate for the right of human beings to be who they are. And if a governmental organisation tries to claim they’re not allowed to be who they are, I will fight against that. I’m a John Steinbeck student – he’s my favourite writer – and there’s a beautiful piece of writing from East of Eden about the freedom of people to be who they are. Any government, religion, institution trying to limit that freedom is what I need to fight against.”

    There are many, many other subjects to cycle through, including Curtis’s friendship with Mariska Hargitay, whose new documentary about her mother, Jayne Mansfield, hit Curtis particularly hard, not least because “Jayne’s house was next to Tony Curtis’s house – that big pink house on Carolwood Drive that Tony Curtis lived in and Sonny and Cher owned prior to him.” (I don’t know if referring to her dad as “Tony Curtis,” is intended to charm, but it does.) There’s also a school reunion she went to over a decade ago; the feeling she has of being “a 14-year-old energy bunny”; the fact we’ve been pronouncing “Everest” wrong all this time; the role played by lyrics from Justin Timberlake’s Like I Love You in her friendship with Lindsay Lohan; and the “Gordian knot” of what happens when not being a brand becomes your brand.

    Curtis could, one suspects, summon an infinite stream of enthusiasms and – perhaps no better advertisement for ageing, this – share urgent thoughts about every last one of them. In an industry in which people weigh their words, veil their opinions and pander to every passing ideal, she has gone in a different direction, one unrestrained by the usual timidities. Or as she puts it with her typical take-it-or-leave-it flatness, “the freedom to have my own mind, wherever it’s going to take me. I’m comfortable with that journey and reject the rest.”

    Freakier Friday is in Australian cinemas from 7 August and from 8 August in the UK and US

    Jamie Lee Curtis wears: (leopard look) jacket and skirt, by Rixo; T-shirt and belt, both by AllSaints; boots, by Dr Martens; tights, by Wolford; (tartan look) suit, by Vivienne Westwood, from mytheresa.com; tights, by Wolford; shoes, by By Far. Fashion stylist: Avigail Collins at Forward Artists. Set stylist: Stefania Lucchesi at Saint Luke Artists. Hair: Sean James at Aim Artists. Makeup: Erin Ayanian Monroe at Cloutier Remix.

    Continue Reading

  • Astronomer hires Gwyneth Paltrow with a wink after ‘kiss cam’ viral video

    Astronomer hires Gwyneth Paltrow with a wink after ‘kiss cam’ viral video

    Data company Astronomer may be making lemonade by hiring Gwyneth Paltrow as a “temporary spokesperson” to answer questions in the wake of a viral “kiss cam” video.

    The company made headlines after internet sleuths identified its CEO and chief people officer as the man and woman seen embracing and then hiding their faces on a “kiss cam” at a July 16 Coldplay concert. Both have since resigned.

    Paltrow appeared in a television-style spot on Astronomer’s social media on Friday making a pitch for the company’s everyday strengths.

    “Astronomer has gotten a lot of questions over the last few days, and they wanted me to answer the most common ones,” said Paltrow, who split with Coldplay singer Chris Martin in 2014.

    Paltrow cut off a question that started with “OMG!” to emphatically say, “Yes, Astronomer is the best place to run Apache Airflow.”

    “We’ve been thrilled so many people have a newfound interest in data workflow automation,” she added.

    She interrupted another question — “How is your social media team holding …” — to make a pitch for an Astronomer conference in September.

    Paltrow concluded, “We will now be returning to what we do best — delivering game-changing results for our customers.”

    CEO Andy Byron resigned on July 19, and Chief People Officer Kristin Cabot followed on Thursday, according to statements from the company.

    Their body language after the camera captured them in an embrace led Martin to remark on stage, “Either they’re having an affair or they’re just very shy.”

    Astronomer said afterward it was investigating the incident. “Our leaders are expected to set the standard in both conduct and accountability,” it said on July 18.

    The company confirmed Thursday that Cabot was the woman in the video. Neither she nor Byron have responded to requests for comment.

    Astronomer, a New York-based company, helps companies develop, grow, and analyze products using artificial intelligence.

    Continue Reading

  • Young people at Latitude explain how hard it is to get a job

    Young people at Latitude explain how hard it is to get a job

    Charlie Jones

    BBC News, Suffolk

    Reporting fromLatitude Festival
    BBC Abi has long brown hair and looks into the camera with a serious expressionBBC

    Abi would love to get a part-time job to earn some money and get some independence

    Every day, Abi applies for part-time jobs to be a waitress or work in a shop.

    The 16-year-old, from Colchester, Essex, has made more than 50 job applications recently but has never heard anything back.

    Speaking at Latitude Festival, near Southwold, Suffolk, Abi says it is very difficult for her generation to find part-time employment.

    “I worry that in the future even when I have qualifications I won’t be able to get a job. It just feels impossible,” she says.

    Abi, who wants to be a paediatric therapist, has been predicted top grades when she collects her GCSE results next month but says it is not enough.

    “Employers want experience, but I can’t get any. I want the responsibility and I want to give something back,” she says.

    She feels grateful that her parents have paid for her festival ticket and is aware many families would not be able to afford it.

    “I want to pay my own way. I would love to be part of a team and a job would give me some independence rather than relying on them.”

    ‘We want to earn our own money’

    Ella is wearing a bandana and has a black lace cardigan on, Lydia is wearing a white top with a jacket, and both smile at the camera

    Ella (left) and Lydia (right) say they have applied for multiple part-time jobs

    Many young people at Latitude say they have either borrowed money to attend or had their tickets paid for by their parents.

    Ella and Lydia, both aged 16 and from Lincoln, keep handing out their CVs when they go into town and send multiple emails to employers but have had no luck getting work.

    “No-one in our friendship group has a job,” Ella says.

    The teenagers, who have just finished their GCSEs and will continue in education, had to ask their parents to pay for their tickets.

    “We would love to earn our own money but it feels like it will never happen,” Lydia adds.

    How much does Latitude Festival cost?

    Eight sheep spray-painted pink grazing in front of a large mirrored sign which reads: Latitude

    Henham Park has been home to the Latitude Festival since 2006

    Up to 40,000 people are expected to be at Latitude each day, where headliners include Sting, Fatboy Slim and Snow Patrol.

    Adult weekend camping tickets cost £308. The festival offers a plan where payments can be spread out.

    Children aged up to four are free for the weekend while those aged five to 12 cost £28. Teenagers aged 13 to 15 pay £190 and over-16s pay adult prices.

    Adult day tickets cost £110 plus fees. Under fours are free and children cost £18, but those aged over 13 must pay adult prices for day tickets.

    Campers are allowed to bring their own alcohol into the camping areas but not the main areas, where it costs £6.95 for a pint of lager.

    ‘We’ve borrowed money from our parents to come’

    Three teenage boys, one with his top off, the other two waer white t-shirts, smiling at the camera

    Zac aged 17, Freddi aged 17 and Matt aged 18 say they have had to borrow money for the festival

    Zac and Freddi, both 17, and their friend Matt, aged 18, all from Norwich, have had to borrow money from their parents to attend the festival.

    Zac is about to start an electrician’s apprenticeship while Matt is going to university to study for a degree apprenticeship in quantity surveying.

    Freddi is at college and working in a pub, cooking and washing up, which he says is the only job he was able to get without experience.

    “It’s minimum wage but I feel lucky to have got it,” he says.

    He hopes to be able to afford to go to university to study criminology.

    Many of their friends are Neets, meaning they are not in education, employment or training, and one has applied for “more than 100 jobs”.

    Almost one million young people across the UK fall into this category, according to the Office for National Statistics (ONS).

    That equates to about one in eight young people. Graduates make up about 10% of them.

    Job vacancies in the UK are currently at their lowest level in nearly four years.

    In April, National Insurance Contributions paid by employers increased while a rise in the minimum wage came into force.

    The hike is forecast to raise £25bn in revenues by the end of the Parliament, but some analysts say it has discouraged firms from hiring.

    There are concerns the forthcoming Employment Rights Bill could make it even harder for employers to offer people part-time jobs.

    The bill includes a right to guaranteed hours and a crackdown on zero-hour contracts without the offer of work.

    ‘Unemployment can affect mental health’

    Youth Futures Foundation Abigail, who has shoulder length brown hair, smiles at the camera. She is wearing a beige top and standing in front of a burgundy background. Youth Futures Foundation

    Abigail Coxon, from the Youth Futures Foundation, says being out of work can have a scarring effect on young people

    Many Neets are economically inactive, meaning they are not actively seeking work, according to the ONS.

    Poor mental health is one of the key issues preventing them finding work, according to The Youth Futures Foundation.

    The organisation, which aims to help marginalised young people find work, says unemployment can be both a cause and a consequence of mental ill health.

    It is calling for more inclusive entry routes into work – through apprenticeships and employment support programmes.

    Abigail Coxon, a senior economist at the organisation, says being out of work and education “can have a scarring effect on young people even decades later, impacting their future prospects and wellbeing”.

    Mental health needs to be prioritised, she says, and “preventative solutions that bring together health services, education, employers, civil society and other stakeholders” must be found.

    A Department for Work and Pensions official said getting more young people into work was a priority for the government.

    “We are determined that no young person is left behind as we drive up growth and opportunity in every corner of the country.

    “Through our Plan for Change we are transforming job centres, testing new ways of delivering targeted youth employment support and giving every young person the opportunity to earn or learn through our Youth Guarantee, while we significantly expand mental health support.”

    BBC Tackling it Together logo banner

    Expert tips for finding work

    1. Search beyond a 40-mile radius – Remote, hybrid and flexible working open up opportunities further away.

    2. Use key words in your searches – Online algorithms will pick up on daily searches and send you more of the same.

    3. Do not wait for a job to be advertised – Contact a manager at a business that you like the look of as you never know what opportunities might be coming up.

    4. Sell your skills – Use social media sites such as LinkedIn which showcase your skills and experience. Other platforms such as X and Instagram can prove useful when touting yourself out to potential employers as well.

    5. Get learning – While you are on the hunt for a job see if there are ways to fill gaps in your CV with free courses, volunteering or shadowing.

    6. Celebrate the small wins – Set personal targets, such as a certain number of jobs to apply for in a week or a number of cold emails to send, and acknowledge the little wins along the way to keep your spirits up.

    You can read tips from careers experts in full here.

    Continue Reading

  • Mohit Suri, Ahaan Panday and Aneet Padda’s ‘Saiyaara’ becomes second biggest hit of 2025, surpasses Akshay Kumar’s ‘Housefull 5’ in just 8 days | Hindi Movie News

    Mohit Suri, Ahaan Panday and Aneet Padda’s ‘Saiyaara’ becomes second biggest hit of 2025, surpasses Akshay Kumar’s ‘Housefull 5’ in just 8 days | Hindi Movie News

    Mohit Suri’s Saiyaara is a box office hit. The film stars Ahaan Pandya and Aneet Padda. Saiyaara has earned Rs 190.25 crore in just eight days. It surpassed Housefull 5 collections. Experts predict a Rs 250 crore lifetime run. The film’s success continues due to postponed releases. Saiyaara’s second Friday earned Rs 17.50 crore.

    Mohit Suri’s Saiyaara, starring newcomers Ahaan Pandya and Aneet Padda, has emerged as the surprise box office juggernaut of the year. The romantic drama, which opened to solid numbers with Rs 21.5 crore on its first Friday and ended its 1st week collection at Rs 172.75 crore. The film witnessed remarkable growth over the opening weekend and sustained well through the weekdays, it averaged over Rs 20 crore for the first six days of its release..In just 8 days, Saiyaara has raked in Rs 190.25 crore at the Indian box office, overtaking Akshay Kumar’s Housefull 5 (Rs 183.38 crore) to become the second highest-grossing film of 2025 so far. Housefull 5 had a battery of stars alongside Akshay like Abhishek Bachchan, Fardeen Khan, Ritiesh Deshmukh, Sonam Bajwa, Jacqueline Fernandez , Sanjay Dutt and Jackie Shroff.

    Mohit Suri’s Emotional Wrap on ‘Saiyaara’ Sets Hearts Ablaze

    What makes Saiyaara’s success even more impressive is that it features newcomers in the lead and belongs to a genre that rarely cracks the Rs 150 crore mark in today’s action-heavy market. With the second weekend underway, trade experts are now eyeing a possible Rs 250 crore lifetime run. The film is second to just Vicky Kaushal ‘s Chhaava which went on to make Rs 585.5 crore in Hindi and overall Rs 600 crore across languages.

    Poll

    Which film are you more excited to see based on box office performance?

    The dream run for Saiyaara is going to continue thanks to the postponement of Ajay Devgn and Mrunal Thakur’s Son of Sardaar 2 which was slated to release on 25th July. In fact even the newer releases like Marvel’s The Fantastic Four: First Steps have paled in collection earning just over Rs 5 crore in front of Saiyaara which on second Friday earned Rs 17.50 crore. For Mohit Suri, this marks a career resurgence, while Ahaan Pandya and Aneet Padda have instantly become the industry’s most talked-about newcomers.Saiyaara Full Movie Collection: ‘Saiyaara’ box office collection Day 8: Mohit Suri’s romantic drama crossed Rs 190 crore mark; Ahaan Panday and Aneet Padda starrer to enter Rs 200 crore club today


    Continue Reading

  • Mohit Suri’s ‘Saiyaara’ BEATS Aamir Khan’s ‘Sitaare Zameen Par’ at box office; Ahaan Panday and Aneet Padda starrer hits Rs 220 crore mark worldwide |

    Mohit Suri’s ‘Saiyaara’ BEATS Aamir Khan’s ‘Sitaare Zameen Par’ at box office; Ahaan Panday and Aneet Padda starrer hits Rs 220 crore mark worldwide |

    Mohit Suri’s romantic drama Saiyaara, starring debutants Ahaan Panday and Aneet Padda, has crossed another major milestone at the box office by surpassing the lifetime collections of Aamir Khan’s ‘Sitaare Zameen Par’. With a net total of Rs 172.50 crore in India within its first week, ‘Saiyaara’ has officially taken its place as the current fourth-highest-earning Bollywood film of 2025, according to sacnilk. Aamir Khan’s emotional drama had previously closed its theatrical run with approximately Rs 160.62 crore in domestic collections, a record that the romantic drama has now overtaken in its 7-day run.

    Top 3 Highest-Earning Films

    The movie now trails only behind ‘Chhaava’, which earned an estimated Rs 601 crore, Housefull 5, which occupies the second spot with a collection of Rs 183 crore, and ‘Raid 2’ which earned Rs 173 crore.

    Poll

    Do you think ‘Saiyaara’ will surpass Rs 250 crore worldwide?

    Global Box Office

    Globally, the film has recorded even more impressive numbers. With an India gross of Rs 183 crore and an overseas gross of Rs 37 crore, Saiyaara has achieved a total worldwide gross of Rs 220 crore. With no major Hindi releases lined up in the coming days and strong, sustained occupancy, Saiyaara is well on its way to crossing the Rs 200 crore India net mark and potentially breaching Rs 250 crore worldwide if momentum holds in its second weekend.Saiyaara Full Movie Collection: ‘Saiyaara’ box office collection Day 8: Mohit Suri’s romantic drama crossed Rs 190 crore mark; Ahaan Panday and Aneet Padda starrer to enter Rs 200 crore club today The film’s success is being attributed to a combination of heartfelt storytelling, striking visuals, and strong lead performances. Director Suri, known for emotionally charged romances like Aashiqui 2 and Ek Villain, brings a fresh pairing of Ahaan Panday and Aneet Padda and has particularly impressed viewers, with many praising the chemistry between the two newcomers.

    Saiyaara Music Tops Charts

    Music has also played a pivotal role in the film’s popularity. The film’s title track has struck a chord globally, recently entering the Top 5 on the Global Spotify charts with over 4.9 million streams. The music of ‘Saiyaara’ features seven songs composed by Mithoon, Sachet-Parampara, Tanishk Bagchi, Rishabh Kant, Vishal Mishra, Faheem Abdullah and Arslan Nisami.Alongside Pandey and Padda, the romance also stars Geeta Agarwal, Rajesh Kumar, Varun Badola and Shaad Randhawa in key roles.See More:Saiyaara box office day 7: The Ahaan Panday-Aneet Padda starrer surpasses Rocky Aur Rani Kii Prem Kahani with Rs 170 crore collection


    Continue Reading

  • WWE Pays Tribute to Hulk Hogan on ‘Smackdown’

    WWE Pays Tribute to Hulk Hogan on ‘Smackdown’

    WWE paid tribute to Hulk Hogan on this week’s episode of “SmackDown.”

    Hogan, who passed away at age 71 on Thursday, was honored during the broadcast with an opening segment featuring a large number of WWE stars and personnel standing at the top of the “SmackDown” entrance ramp. Along with current stars like Cody Rhodes and Jacob Fatu, WWE legends like Jimmy Hart and Sgt. Slaughter were present.

    As the crowd repeatedly chanted “Hogan,” WWE chief content officer Paul “Triple H” Levesque said, “Ladies and gentlemen, yesterday we lost one of the biggest and most globally recognized icons in the world. A man I grew up watching, was fortunate enough to share the ring with, and like so many of us were honored to call a friend.”

    “The truth is, he captivated millions of people and inspired them around the globe,” he continued. “We would not be standing here right now, all of us together, if it was not for him.” The crowd then stood silent as a ten bell salute rang out in the arena. A highlight reel of Hogan’s career followed, narrated by Levesque.

    Watch the video below.

    Hogan, a.k.a. Terry Bollea, helped WWE (then WWF) become the powerhouse it is today. When Vince McMahon Jr. took the company from a regional promotion to a national one in the 1980s, Hogan was the face of the company for years and headlined multiple WrestleManias, including the very first. With legions of Hulkamaniacs behind him, Hogan told his fans to “train, say your prayers, and eat your vitamins.”

    Hogan held the WWE Heavyweight Championship six times in his career, memorably winning it for the first time against The Iron Sheik and holding it for over four years. His other notable opponents in WWE included Andre the Giant, Roddy Piper, “Macho Man” Randy Savage, and Dwayne “The Rock” Johnson.

    Hogan also famously wrestled for WWE competitor World Championship Wrestling (WCW) in the 1990s, turning heel (wrestling parlance for bad guy) and becoming Hollywood Hulk Hogan as a member of the New World Order (NWO). He has also wrestled for promotions like New Japan Pro Wrestling and TNA.

    According to the Clearwater Police Department in Florida, Hogan died Thursday morning due to cardiac arrest. He was treated by a rescue crew before being taken to the hospital, where he was pronounced dead.

    Continue Reading

  • Ex-MasterChef host ‘sorry’ but says he’s ‘not a groper’

    Ex-MasterChef host ‘sorry’ but says he’s ‘not a groper’

    Noor Nanji & Steven McIntosh

    Culture reporters

    BBC Gregg Wallace on MasterChef, wearing a dark blue shirtBBC

    An independent review upheld 45 allegations against Wallace relating to his behaviour on MasterChef

    Former MasterChef host Gregg Wallace has said he is “so sorry” to anyone he hurt, but insisted that he is “not a groper, a sex pest or a flasher”.

    In a new interview with The Sun, the TV presenter also defended his sacked co-host John Torode, saying he is “not a racist”.

    Wallace was sacked earlier this month after a report upheld 45 allegations about his behaviour on the programme, including one of unwelcome physical contact and three of being in a state of undress.

    Torode was also axed after a claim against him using “an extremely offensive racist term” was upheld. He has said he has “no recollection” of the incident.

    The inquiry, conducted by an independent law firm, was ordered by MasterChef’s production company Banijay in the wake of a BBC News investigation last year, which first revealed claims of misconduct against Wallace.

    Since then, more than 50 people have come forward to BBC News with claims against him.

    They include allegations he groped one MasterChef worker at a wrap party and pulled his trousers down in front of another.

    BBC News has repeatedly requested an interview with Wallace but he has declined.

    The majority of substantiated claims against Wallace related to inappropriate sexual language and humour, but also culturally insensitive or racist comments.

    In his first interview since being sacked, the presenter acknowledged that he had said things that “offended people, that weren’t socially acceptable and perhaps they felt too intimidated or nervous to say anything at the time.

    “I understand that now – and to anyone I have hurt, I am so sorry.”

    He indicated his background was to blame for those comments, as a former greengrocer from Peckham working in an environment that was “jovial and crude”.

    But he added: “I’m not a groper. People think I’ve been taking my trousers down and exposing myself – I am not a flasher.

    “People think I’m a sex pest. I am not.”

    Wallace said that one of the upheld claims against him related to a widely reported incident in which he had allegedly walked around MasterChef’s set naked with a sock on his penis.

    Addressing that incident, he said that there were no contestants on set, and just four of his friends from the show outside his dressing room door.

    “I was getting changed to go to a black tie event, a charity event. I put my bow tie on and my shirt. It’s only them outside the door. I put the sock on, opened the door, went, ‘Wahey!’ and shut the door again.

    “The people interviewed were either amused or bemused. Nobody was distressed,” he claimed.

    Autism defence

    Ahead of the report’s publication earlier this month, Wallace posted a now-deleted statement on Instagram in which he appeared to link the misconduct allegations he was facing to his recent autism diagnosis.

    That led to a backlash from charities and groups working with disabled people. One charity told BBC News that autism is “not a free pass for bad behaviour”, while other groups warned that such remarks risked stigmatising the autistic community.

    In his interview on Friday night, Wallace spoke again about his diagnosis, saying: “I know I struggle to read people. I know people find me weird. Autism is a disability, a registered disability.”

    He also repeated a claim that he “never [wears] pants”, saying: “It’s not sexualised. It’s hypersensitivity – that happens with autism.”

    John Torode and Gregg Wallace on MasterChef

    The BBC has said a previously filmed series featuring Wallace and Torode will still be broadcast as planned

    Last week, Wallace’s co-host Torode was sacked after an allegation of using a severely offensive racist term was upheld.

    BBC News has since revealed that the alleged incident took place on the set of MasterChef in 2018.

    Torode has said any racist language is “wholly unacceptable”.

    Addressing the claim against his co-host, Wallace said: “I’ve known John for 30 years and he is not a racist.

    “And as evidence of that, I’ll show you the incredible diversity of the people that he has championed, MasterChef winners, over the years. There is no way that man is a racist. No way. And my sympathies go out to John because I don’t want anybody to go through what I’ve been through.”

    But he added that he had unfollowed Torode and his wife Lisa Faulkner on social media, saying: “We never really did get on that well.

    “We’re two very, very different characters.”

    Earlier this week, the BBC announced that a new series of MasterChef, which was recorded before Wallace and Torode were sacked, will still be broadcast as planned, on BBC One and iPlayer.

    Some of the women who came forward with claims against Wallace have said they did not think the new series should be shown.

    One former MasterChef worker, who claims he groped her, told BBC News the decision to go ahead showed “a blatant disregard for the people who have come forward”.

    The BBC said it had taken the decision “after careful consideration and consultation with the contestants”.

    It added it has not yet taken a decision on what to do with the completed celebrity series and Christmas special.

    Continue Reading

  • How reality TV has changed the way we think

    How reality TV has changed the way we think

    Alex Taylor profile image
    BBC A treated image showing an old TV screen with a close up eyeBBC

    It was 17 August 2000 and a group of people were huddled around a computer screen in the BBC TV newsroom, when suddenly there came a collective gasp. One of the group turned around and announced, very solemnly: “Nasty Nick’s gone.”

    Nick Bateman – a housemate in the UK reality TV show Big Brother – was found to have attempted to “manipulate” his fellow contestant’s votes, and was asked to leave the reality TV house. It would become front-page news.

    The saga prompted a nationwide moral debate, not only about the incident but the very existence of the show.

    Writing for the London Evening Standard one TV critic accused Big Brother’s top executive Peter Bazalgette of “smearing excrement over our screens”.

    A reviewer from The Herald newspaper denounced the housemates as “fakers, chancers, dullards, no-marks, and dimwits”.

    Yet Britons voted with their feet (or their remote controls). Some 10 million people tuned in for the finale on 15 September – marking the start of a major cultural shift.

    Press Association Host Davina McCall at the Big Brother house for series sixPress Association

    It is exactly 25 years since the first Big Brother UK series – and reality TV has snowballed since

    Now, 25 years on, reality TV is one of the most popular genres on screens in the UK.

    The Traitors attracted more than 10 million viewers for the opening episode of third series in January. And Love Island UK may have seen audiences shrink since its episode peak of six million in 2019, but it has still been renewed 10 times.

    For years, the dark sides of reality TV have been unpicked. There have been concerning, in some cases devastating, impacts on the contestants of certain shows, which has rightly prompted change.

    As for critics, some have continued to dismiss many reality TV shows as superficial escapism, at best – or, at worst, harmfully divisive.

    Listen closely, however, and a small clutch of psychologists and social experts are quietly starting to tell a different story – one that suggests that the impact of watching reality TV might not be as bad for brains (or social consciences) as it may seem.

    Getty Images/ Press Association Two images: A close up of Reality TV star "Nasty" Nick Bateman, and the other image showing him leaving the Big Brother house after being evictedGetty Images/ Press Association

    Nick Bateman was asked to leave the Big Brother house. It would become front-page news

    Some suggest that it could help viewers build a better grasp of perspectives outside our realm of experience, or even overcome biases.

    “Reality TV has historically been more diverse demographically than other forms of media,” says Danielle Lindemann, a sociology professor at Lehigh University, Pennsylvania.

    “[It] casts a spotlight over patches of the social landscape that we don’t always see, so in that way, it can be a tool for greater social understanding.”

    A glimpse behind the curtain

    The UK Big Brother, based on a Dutch television series of the same name, brought together a group of 10 strangers in a house in London.

    For 64 days, contestants were sealed off from the outside world and their every move filmed, with viewers voting out roughly one person each week until a winner was handed the £70,000 prize.

    What was truly innovative wasn’t the competition format but the connection between the audiences and the ordinary people whose lives inside the house played out on screen.

    “That didn’t exist before,” says Dr Jacob Johanssen, associate professor of communications at St Mary’s University, who researches the psychological effects of reality TV.

    “For the first time, viewers started seeing ordinary people on television who weren’t celebrities, which is a very different phenomenon.”

    ITV/PA Wire Seven Love Island contestants pose in front of a giant heart iconITV/PA Wire

    Today ‘reality tv’ covers a broad spectrum, including competition-based shows such as Survivor, The Traitors and Love Island – some of their cast from the 2022 series are pictured

    Today reality TV covers a broad spectrum — from fly-on-the-wall dramas that document the lives of friends (The Only Way is Essex, Geordie Shore, Made in Chelsea) to competition-based shows (Survivor, The Traitors, Love Island) that revolve around the ‘reality’ of contestants’ lives.

    But its power remains the same – each offers a glimpse into the dramas of real peoples’ lives – a chance to see behind the curtain.

    “You do see lots of unfiltered, raw emotions… in these different programmes,” continues Dr Johanssen. “If we see them in real life, usually that would happen in the private sphere, certainly not in public.”

    ‘People feel less isolated or alienated’

    Dr Johanssen has worked on the reality show Embarrassing Bodies, which features patients consulting with doctors, aiming to destigmatise common health complaints.

    As he sees it, “even though there are lots of problematic aspects to it, it made people aware there are different kinds of body types, there are different conditions people might have.

    “It perhaps made people feel less isolated or alienated.”

    The same can go for disability awareness. Pete Bennett, the winner of the 2006 series of Big Brother, was a livewire personality who won over the public, also happened to have Tourette’s syndrome.

    His appearance on the show felt groundbreaking at a time when disability awareness and representation in the UK was nowhere near current understanding – and it gave enough screen time for a mass audience to both be introduced to Tourette’s, but also warm to Pete.

    “I’d get bullied a lot with Tourette’s,” Pete explained of his time before Big Brother. “I couldn’t really go out and enjoy myself without being ridiculed or started on because of my ticks.”

    But he adds: “I’ve never been bullied since leaving the house.”

    Getty Images Pete Bennett smiles - he wears a black outfit and has short bleached blonde hairGetty Images

    Pete Bennett, the winner of the 2006 series of Big Brother: “I’ve never been bullied since leaving the house”

    Then there are the conversations about uncomfortable, and sometimes controversial, subjects that contestants have delved into too – in some cases a lightning rod for national discussions.

    Over the years, several Love Island contestants have been accused of “gaslighting,” a potential form of coercive control, which is a criminal offence. It has prompted much discussion on social media, in one instance leading Women’s Aid to release a statement.

    Prof Helen Wood of Lancaster University, who researches and advises on the ethics and practices of reality TV, recalls a separate discussion about domestic abuse and argues that raising this can be a positive.

    “I remember a big debate about Love Island and whether it allows… a conversation on what domestic abuse looks like?” she says. “For some audiences that could be triggering, for some audiences that could be helpful.”

    Insights into social cues… and deception

    Faye Winter was 26 when she appeared on Love Island. She worked as a lettings manager at the time, but lamented there were, as she saw it, “no fit men in Devon”, where she lived, so she applied for the show and joined the 2021 series.

    Quickly, she partnered up with Teddy Soares, a financial consultant originally from Manchester.

    “From a girl’s standpoint, they’re going to have to get used to me stirring a few pots and causing a bit of a ruckus,” he told ITV after signing up.

    Getty Images Faye Winter and Teddy Soares attend ITV PaloozaGetty Images

    Love Island contestant Faye Winter’s heated, expletive-filled shouts prompted complaints to Ofcom

    The promised ruckus soon materialised, after Faye was shown a clip in which Teddy admitted to being sexually attracted to another contestant.

    Her heated, expletive-filled shouts, in which she called Teddy two-faced, prompted almost 25,000 complaints to Ofcom.

    Some considered her response disrespectful and an “overreaction”. Yet other viewers strongly identified with her.

    “I got a lot of trolling for it,” she later told a newspaper. “[But] I got a lot of people who said they’ve been through it”.

    Dr Rosie Jahng, an associate professor of communications from Wayne State University in Michigan, believes that the insights offered by reality TV into social cues, body language, and deception, can be valuable.

    “It becomes like testing a moral boundary – we start to ask, ‘what would I do in that situation?’”

    When reality TV becomes ‘constructed’ reality

    Understanding how others react in situations can in itself be informative, or prompt self-reflection. But what happens when reality TV deviates away from documented reality to a murkier type of “constructed” reality?

    A former Made in Chelsea cast member previously explained how it worked when she was on the show.

    “The producers spoke to us on the phone for hours every week,” Francesca “Cheska” Hull, who appeared from the first series, previous said in an interview.

    “They’d come on nights out with us. They put us in situations that created drama.”

    Getty Images Seven cast members from early seasons of Made in Chelsea pose for a photographGetty Images

    Cheska Hull (fourth from the left) poses with some fellow Made in Chelsea cast members

    She stressed that scripts weren’t used but added, “You knew the conversations you had to have”.

    On the surface, at least, this seems to deviate from the idea of following raw emotions. But psychologists have suggested that even constructed reality can have benefits.

    “It can potentially offer benefits to viewers and society because it can lead to wider conversations about the world we want to live in,” argues Dr Johanssen. “For instance when it comes to problematic or unethical behaviour or questions of gender identity and inequality for example.”

    The darker side of reality TV

    The experiences of people who appear on the shows, however, raises an entirely different set of questions.

    “We have to separate out the value of a show sparking a conversation and what’s happening to participants,” explains Prof Wood. “A lot of shows, especially early shows, were about putting people in very difficult situations that were trauma-inducing.”

    During the 2007 series of Celebrity Big Brother, actress Shilpa Shetty found herself at the centre of a race and bullying row, after a fellow contestant called her “Shilpa poppadum”.

    The incident sparked a national conversation about racism.

    Press Association Two images: On the left Shilpa Shetty after leaving the Big Brother house, and on the right, she holds a bouquet of flowersPress Association

    During the 2007 series of Celebrity Big Brother, actress Shilpa Shetty found herself at the centre of a race and bullying row

    “With the Shilpa Shetty case… there were lots of complaints where people felt someone was being bullied or not being treated well on screen,” says Prof Wood.

    “I think that moment enabled a sort of shift. We don’t want to see that anymore.”

    More recently, some Love Island contestants have spoken about their experiences of poor mental health following the show, as well as struggles with the relentless scrutiny.

    A UK parliamentary committee carried out an inquiry into reality TV in 2019, and said its “decision to launch the inquiry into reality TV comes after the death of a guest following filming for The Jeremy Kyle Show and the deaths of two former contestants in the reality dating show Love Island”.

    PA Media Steve Dymond appearing on the Jeremy Kyle Show with host Jeremy Kyle and partner, Jane CallaghanPA Media

    The Jeremy Kyle Show was a tabloid talk show on ITV

    “We’re still not there in terms of whether participants are completely adequately cared for,” argues Dr Johanssen, who submitted evidence to the inquiry.

    “They have no agency or control over the edit, or what an episode looks like, how somebody is portrayed.”

    However, Love Island’s producers have said they’ve learned how to better support the cast and crew. Revised welfare measures have been introduced including specialised social media training for contestants, as well as video training and guidance on topics including coercive behaviour and avoiding discriminatory language.

    Ofcom also established new rules to protect those appearing on TV and radio reality shows, following a steady rise in complaints over the welfare of guests — saying broadcasters must “properly look after” contributors, particularly those who might be at risk of “significant harm” as a result of taking part.

    “A lot of the broadcasters are saying to us that there’s a shift in mood,” adds Prof Wood, who is working on a research project looking at care practices in UK reality TV.

    “They want participants… to get something better out of it than they would have in the past.”

    Reflecting society back at itself – or shaping it?

    The question that remains, however, is what the collective impact is. Is reality TV just holding up a mirror to society, or could it really play an active part in shaping it?

    Prof Lindemann believes that there are examples of positive connections between the material on reality shows and how viewers engage with the world.

    Even as far back as 2011, it was found to be having an effect on behaviour.

    Press Association Craig Philips (left) winner of Big Brother, celebrates outside the house with fellow contestants Anna Nolan and Darren RamseyPress Association

    Big Brother contestant Craig Philips (left) celebrates winning the first UK series 25 years ago

    She points to one US study which found that girls who watched dating shows like Temptation Island, The Bachelor, or Joe Millionaire were more likely to talk with one another about sex.

    In 2014, a paper was published, cowritten Melissa Kearney an associate professor of economics at the University of Maryland, that drew links between a reduction in teenage birth rates in the US, and the airing of a reality series on MTV called 16 and Pregnant, which offered a brutally honest look at life for pregnant teenagers.

    This show “was not specifically designed as an anti-teen childbearing campaign,” wrote the authors, “but it seems to have had that effect by showing that being a pregnant teen and a new mother is hard.”

    They concluded: “We find that media has the potential to be a powerful driver of social outcomes.”

    One decade on, that certainly hasn’t changed. Which makes reality television a powerful tool. In some cases that tool is powerful for the worse – but just sometimes, it really could shape those watching it for the better.

    Top picture credit: ITV/PA Wire

    BBC InDepth is the home on the website and app for the best analysis, with fresh perspectives that challenge assumptions and deep reporting on the biggest issues of the day. And we showcase thought-provoking content from across BBC Sounds and iPlayer too. You can send us your feedback on the InDepth section by clicking on the button below.

    Continue Reading

  • Alex Warren scores first UK Number one album

    Alex Warren scores first UK Number one album

    Alex Warren soars high with album ‘You’ll Be Alright, Kid’

    Alex Warren just secured his first Official UK Number 1 album with You’ll Be Alright, Kid.

    The Californian singer-songwriter’s debut collection climbed up 24 spots to reach the summit for the first time after spending 31 weeks on the chart.

    Originally released as You’ll Be Alright, Kid (Chapter 1) in September 2024, the expanded record now features 21 tracks, including the record-breaking Ordinary, which was recently named the UK’s Official biggest song of 2025 so far.

    Additionally, Tyler, The Creator garnered a fifth Top 10 LP with DON’T TAP THE GLASS which he surprise drop released on Monday.

    The record joins his Top 10 tally, with 2017’s Flower Boy which landed on the Number 9 spot on release, 2019’s IGOR which came in fourth, 2021’s CALL ME IF YOU GET LOST which also came in fourth on release and 2024 chart-topper CHROMAKOPIA.

    Ahead of Oasis’s London Wembley Stadium shows, Time Flies… 1994-2009 is on the number 3 spot, the album (What’s The Story) Morning Glory? is on number 4 and Definitely Maybe is on the fifth spot, all holding their positions firmly in the Top 5.

    As we speak of tours bringing popularity to music, Billie Eilish’s HIT ME HARD AND SOFT stepped up two ranks and came in the tenth spot while her 2021 LP Happier Than Ever came in 35.


    Continue Reading

  • 'Saiyaara' box office collection day 8: The Ahaan Panday, Aneet Padda starrer sees a drop, records its LO – Times of India

    'Saiyaara' box office collection day 8: The Ahaan Panday, Aneet Padda starrer sees a drop, records its LO – Times of India

    1. ‘Saiyaara’ box office collection day 8: The Ahaan Panday, Aneet Padda starrer sees a drop, records its LO  Times of India
    2. Saiyaara Box Office Day 8 (Early Trends): Ahaan Panday & Aneet Padda Starrer Is Now Bollywood’s 3rd Highest-Grossing Film Of 2025!  Koimoi
    3. Saiyaara box office collection Day 5: Mohit Suri directorial headed for Rs 150 crore mark; Ahaan Panday a  Times of India
    4. Deanne Panday pens heartfelt note for son Ahaan Panday, shares childhood pics after Saiyaara’s success: ‘Stay grounded’  Hindustan Times
    5. Akshay Kumar Calls Saiyaara’s Success ‘Best Thing’: ‘Newcomer Ki Film Itni Chalna Badi Baat Hai’  News18

    Continue Reading