Category: 5. Entertainment

  • Everything We Know So Far About the 2025 Venice Film Festival

    Everything We Know So Far About the 2025 Venice Film Festival

    Below, everything else you need to know about this year’s ceremony:

    Alexander Payne will chair the jury

    American director Alexander Payne (Sideways, The Descendants, The Holdover) will take on the role of jury president at the 2025 Venice Film Festival, succeeding Isabelle Huppert. His appointment has proven controversial, however, given the filmmaker has faced allegations of sexual assault from actress Rose McGowan.

    Kim Novak and Werner Herzog will receive honorary Golden Lions

    Kim Novak made her final film appearance in 1991, in Mike Figgis’s Liebestraum, before retiring from Hollywood. This summer, however, Alfred Hitchcock’s iconic muse—best known for her role as Madeleine Elster in Vertigo—will return to the spotlight to receive a Golden Lion for Lifetime Achievement at the 2025 Venice Film Festival.

    According to artistic director Alberto Barbera, who shared the news on June 10, the decision to honor the actress was an obvious one, as she is “one of the most beloved icons of an entire era of Hollywood films, from her auspicious debut during the mid-1950s until her premature and voluntary exile from the gilded cage of Los Angeles a short while later.”

    Earlier this year, it was announced that Werner Herzog would also receive the same honor. With more than 70 films to his name—spanning fiction and documentary works created across the globe—the German filmmaker has left an indelible mark on the history of cinema. According to Alberto Barbera, Herzog has done so by “testing our ability to see, challenging us to grasp what lies beyond the surface of reality, and pushing the limits of cinematic representation in a relentless quest for a higher, ecstatic truth and new sensory experiences.”

    When will the full lineup be released?

    The full slate of films headed to the 2025 Venice Film Fesitval is expected to be unveiled at the end of July.

    Continue Reading

  • Sellout or washout: will the boom in huge outdoor concerts be sustained after Oasis? | Music industry

    Sellout or washout: will the boom in huge outdoor concerts be sustained after Oasis? | Music industry

    From Lana Del Rey to Beyoncé and Kendrick Lamar, the UK has already hosted a series of gigantic outdoor gigs this year. Having already played six Wembley Stadium shows on their Music of the Spheres tour in 2022, Coldplay are bringing it back for 10 more later this summer, plus two more in Hull. And now, here come Oasis, playing a total of 17 stadium concerts in Cardiff, Manchester, London and Edinburgh.

    These are the kind of figures that get the music industry very excited. Last year, according to UK Music, 23.5m concertgoers spent a total of £10bn in the UK, supporting 72,000 jobs. “Artists are delivering spectacular performances, and there’s nothing like the feeling of being at a live show,” says Denis Desmond, UK and Ireland chair of the massive promoter Live Nation. “We’re seeing a real and sustained boom in outdoor shows, festivals and stadium concerts”.

    Certainly, it looks that way. The Guardian has calculated that in London alone this summer, there are at least 100 single-day outdoor shows with a capacity of 15,000 or more, ranging from events in local parks to stadium shows. Festivals and arena shows have always been popular in the UK, but there have never been so many big outdoor gigs.

    Industry insiders put the shift down to customer demand. That’s undoubtedly part of it – there are many people who enjoy standing in the sun with thousands of others listening to a selection of acts, but have no desire for it to involve camping in the middle of nowhere. One senior figure in the live industry says the changing nature of the music industry has driven the shift, too – social media and streaming mean many artists are popular enough to play to bigger audiences earlier in their careers, and outdoor shows provide the perfect opportunity.

    Immense … Lana Del Rey performs at Hampden Park, Glasgow, June 2025. Photograph: Roberto Ricciuti/Getty Images

    It’s not just consumer-led, though. Local councils have been actively courting promoters to put on shows in parks, to raise money for local services; stadium operators have been trying to attract more shows (the Rugby Football Union wants to put on more shows each year at Twickenham, up from the three it is currently allowed, to nine next year, 12 in 2027 and 15 in 2028).

    Either way, this current glut of shows is so immense that there are those wondering if it can be sustained. All summer, there have been stories of cheap last-minute tickets available on secondary ticketing sites, and Facebook-disseminated offers to shift unsold seats. And while the demand for Oasis tickets might have been enormous, not everyone can be Oasis. At the time of writing, there are seated tickets available in all areas for Catfish and the Bottlemen’s show at Tottenham Hotspur Stadium at the start of August (and plenty for their Cardiff Principality Stadium concert, too). Nor will you have any trouble getting into Post Malone’s two shows at Tottenham. Even at shows billed as sold out, venues don’t appear full – there were many pockets of empty seats when Dua Lipa played the first of two shows at Wembley Stadium.

    That’s not necessarily bad news for the artists, who are paid a guaranteed fee, but it is very bad news for promoters, because shows at this scale tend only to break even when 90% of tickets have been sold. And that is where some industry figures sound a note of caution. “I think we’re all surprised at the amount of large-scale events London can sustain,” one says. “Will it continue at this same growth and to the same scale? Only time will tell.” Another says brusquely: “There are certainly a lot this year, and they’re not all doing well.”

    Artists, too, are uncertain: the Guardian knows of acts who turned down slots high on stadium show bills this summer, because they were concerned about the reputational damage of playing to a crowd sparse enough to be mocked on social media.

    It’s perhaps a measure of industry uncertainty that so few people within live music were willing to talk on the record about this year’s boom, and certainly not to confront the issue of whether sellouts or sparsely attended washouts are likely to shape next summer’s bookings. Desmond, though, remains optimistic. To him, these shows are a chance to build memories: “We’re seeing generations come together – fans who saw the Beatles or the Rolling Stones in the 60s are now attending shows with their children and grandchildren. A connection that only live music can create.”

    Nevertheless, whether those younger generations will need the older ones to pay for the incredible cost of a ticket, and whether the live music sector can continue to operate at the scale that it is, remain points of debate in the industry.

    Continue Reading

  • Squid Game creator initially planned a reunion ending in Season 3

    Squid Game creator initially planned a reunion ending in Season 3

    One of the best South Korean thrillers, Squid Game, finally wrapped up after three seasons on Netflix. It was first released in 2021, with director Hwang Dong-hyuk having no idea it would go on to become a global sensation.

    So, the creator decided to continue the story of survival in a world consumed by greed beyond Season 1. Even though completing the series brought him peace, the weight of global expectations made the process challenging. Even with its massive success, the ending of Squid Game Season 3 has left fans split, with some praising its bold choices and others feeling let down.

    One of the most debated aspects is the final twist: every single character who enters the game dies, and the only one left alive is a newborn baby. Interestingly, this wasn’t the original plan. Hwang said in an interview with The Korea Times:

    “I initially vaguely considered a storyline where Gi-hun would survive with a few other contestants and eventually go to meet his daughter in the U.S.”

    He continued:

    “But I reconsidered what story I really wanted to tell with this project and felt that Gi-hun’s journey should end here.”

    Hwang Dong-hyuk also mentioned that while the show brought him incredible fame and success, but also brought exhaustion and pressure. He even lost some teeth while making Squid Game, but didn’t give up.

    Keep reading to explore more about the finale and Hwang Dong-hyuk’s insights.


    Squid Game creator thought of Gi-hun’s survival, but changed his mind

    Gi-hun with his daughter in Season 1 (Image via Netflix).
    Gi-hun with his daughter in Season 1 (Image via Netflix).

    Since Squid Game Season 3 came out on Netflix, fans couldn’t stop discussing the shocking finale no one saw coming. While deaths were expected, many didn’t think of the main character, Gi-hun’s death.

    As seen in the finale episode, the players participate in the Sky Squid Game, where they’re placed in huge towers, resembling the three iconic shapes of the survival thriller. The players were tasked with killing others to enter the final round, and Gi-hun, despite carrying the baby, managed to reach the last tower.

    However, since only one player was meant to survive, Gi-hun chose to sacrifice himself, saying that they’re all human and that some people still choose humanity over greed. This was a heartwrenching part of Squid Game that Hwang Dong-hyuk created to reflect the harsh realities of the world today.

    As mentioned earlier, this wasn’t the ending he originally had in mind. The creator first thought of Gi-hun’s survival and reunion with his daughter in America. But he eventually realized that worsening inequality, continuing wars, and the sense that society is failing to solve its biggest problems were more in line with the message he wanted to leave behind.

    He said:

    “Because ultimately, this project is about the world we live in. Economic inequality has worsened since I made Season 1, the lives of ordinary people have become more difficult, and wars show no signs of ending.”

    Hwang sensed a much darker future coming, and that inspired him to create an ending that fits that emotional tone. He shared that many young people today feel hopeless about the future, and he sees the baby as “our future”. By placing the child in the game, he wanted to show that protecting the next generation, our conscience, and the future requires real struggle and sacrifice.


    Also Read: Leonardo DiCaprio is the Squid Game showrunner’s choice to play the lead in the US rendition— Here’s what he said

    Continue exploring Soap Central for regular updates on TV series, films, and more!