An 8%-lit waxing crescent moon —”the new moon in the old moon’s arms” — will be visible in the west just after sunset on Monday, Aug. 25, 2025. (Photo by: Alan Dyer/VWPics/Universal Images Group via Getty Images)
VWPics/Universal Images Group via Getty Images
Moon gazers across the globe will get the chance to catch a fragile lunar crescent in the western twilight sky on Monday, Aug. 25, 2025. Just one day after the razor-thin newborn moon reappears, the waxing crescent will shine 8% illuminated, sitting just below and to the right of Mars. Though the Red Planet is fading in brightness, the pairing will be a rewarding sight for anyone with a clear horizon — and perhaps a pair of binoculars, too.
Where And When To Look
The crescent moon will become visible in the western sky about 30 minutes after sunset. At this very early stage of the lunar cycle, the moon lingers low on the horizon and sets soon after sunset, so observers have less than an hour to enjoy the view before both objects sink into the twilight haze.
Look due west, ideally from an open vantage point without trees, buildings or hills blocking the horizon. The moon will appear as a slim curve of light, hovering just below and slightly to the right of Mars.
An 8%-lit waxing crescent moon —”the new moon in the old moon’s arms” — will be visible in the west just after sunset on Monday, Aug. 25, 2025.
Stellarium
What You’ll See
The moon will be a delicate crescent in the constellation Virgo, its darkened surface faintly lit by “Earthshine,” the sunlight reflected from Earth’s clouds, ice and oceans. Mars, now getting dimmer, will glow faintly just above and to the left of the lunar crescent.
Since it reached opposition on Jan. 16 — its brightest and closest appearance to Earth since 2022 — Mars has been steadily getting fainter as Earth pulls away from it on its faster orbit of the sun. Mars eventually become lost in the sun’s glare by late November. The next opposition — when Mars once again shines brilliantly — will not occur until Feb. 19, 2027.
A 7.4% crescent moon (earthshine) is seen in Calascio, Italy, on January 13th, 2024. (Photo by Lorenzo Di Cola/NurPhoto via Getty Images)
NurPhoto via Getty Images
Observing Tips
Catching the moon and Mars this evening requires a little preparation. Be outside 20–30 minutes after sunset where you are on Monday evening, and begin scanning low along the horizon. A west-facing overlook, beach, or open field offers the best chance. Binoculars will help you locate Mars if it’s faint against the twilight glow, but what they’ll be really useful for is studying the moon, whose entire disk may be faintly visible thanks to “Earthshine.” The ghostly glow looks fabulous in binoculars.
What’s Next in the Night Sky
This pairing is just the start of several beautiful evening arrangements. On Tuesday, Aug. 26, the 14%-lit crescent moon will slide between Mars and Spica, Virgo’s brightest star. By Wednesday, Aug. 27, a 21%-lit crescent will shine next to Spica and Mars, with the brilliant orange star Arcturus directly above.
Mars’ Valles Marineris stretches nearly a quarter of the way around the planet’s equator. (Image credit: NASA/JPL-Caltech/University of Arizona)
QUICK FACTS
What it is: Candor Chasma, a large canyon on Mars
Where it is: Valles Marineris, the biggest canyon network in the solar system
When it was shared: Aug. 14, 2025
Mars has a huge network of canyons that stretches about 2,500 miles (4,000 kilometers) across its equator. This canyon system, called Valles Marineris, is the largest in the solar system, dwarfing Earth’s largest canyon, which covers 460 miles (750 km) under Greenland’s ice sheet. (Condolences to the Grand Canyon and its mere 277-mile length.)
First imaged by NASA’s Mariner 9 spacecraft in 1972, Valles Marineris has been captured by the HiRISE camera on NASA’s Mars Reconnaissance Orbiter many times in its 19 years in orbit. However, this geological wonder still holds many secrets.
This latest photo, taken May 24 and published last week, is of the eastern side of Candor Chasma, one of the largest canyons within Valles Marineris. What it reveals could change how planetary geologists think about Mars’ ancient environment.
Using its ability to see detail down to the size of a kitchen table, HiRISE produced an image that shows layered deposits of sediment several meters thick, scientists at the Lunar and Planetary Laboratory at the University of Arizona, which developed and operates the camera, said in a description of the image. Crucially, these layers of sediment must date to after the canyon itself formed, because they appear to have been eroded, warped and bent by tectonic movements.
Related: 32 things on Mars that look like they shouldn’t be there
Mars doesn’t have plate tectonics like Earth does. Instead, its crust is like one giant plate, according to NASA. But faults and fractures still form in the Martian crust as it cools. Unlike Earth’s Grand Canyon, which was carved by a river, Valles Marineris — including Candor Chasma — is thought to have formed by volcanic activity, with landslides, floods and erosion later sculpting it into its present form.
In 2021, the European Space Agency (ESA) revealed that the ExoMars Trace Gas Orbiter, a collaboration between ESA and the Russian space agency, had found water beneath the surface in Candor Chasma. It’s thought that up to 40% of the near-surface material in Valles Marineris could be water. That would make it akin to Earth’s permafrost regions in Alaska, Canada, Greenland and Siberia, where water ice permanently persists under dry soil because of the constant low temperatures.
Get the world’s most fascinating discoveries delivered straight to your inbox.
With its steep walls and chaotic landscapes, Candor Chasma would be challenging for a Mars rover to explore. However, the German Space Agency’s Valles Marineris Exploration project would study the possibility of sending a swarm of autonomous rovers, crawlers and uncrewed aerial vehicles to this treacherous terrain.
For more sublime space images, check out our Space Photo of the Week archives.
Optical microscopy is a key technique for understanding dynamic biological processes in cells, but observing these high-speed cellular dynamics accurately, at high spatial resolution, has long been a formidable task.
Now, in an article published in Light: Science & Applications, researchers from The University of Osaka, together with collaborating institutions, have unveiled a cryo-optical microscopy technique that take a high-resolution, quantitatively accurate snapshot at a precisely selected timepoint in dynamic cellular activity. Capturing fast dynamic cellular events with spatial detail and quantifiability has been a major challenge owing to a fundamental trade-off between temporal resolution and the ‘photon budget’, that is, how much light can be collected for the image. With limited photons and only dim, noisy images, important features in both space and time become lost in the noise.
“Instead of chasing speed in imaging, we decided to freeze the entire scene,” explains one of the lead authors Kosuke Tsuji. “We developed a special sample-freezing chamber to combine the advantages of live-cell and cryo-fixation microscopy. By rapidly freezing live cells under the optical microscope, we could observe a frozen snapshot of the cellular dynamics at high resolutions.”
For instance, the team froze calcium ion wave propagation in live heart-muscle cells. The intricately detailed frozen wave was then observed in three dimensions using a super-resolution technique that cannot normally observe fast cellular dynamics due to its slow imaging acquisition speed.
“This research began with a bold shift in perspective: to arrest dynamic cellular processes during optical imaging rather than struggle to track them in motion. We believe this will serve as a powerful foundational technique, offering new insights across life-science and medical research,” says senior author Katsumasa Fujita. One of the lead authors, Masahito Yamanaka, adds “Our technique preserves both spatial and temporal features of live cells with instantaneous freezing, making it possible to observe their states in detail. While cells are immobilized, we can take the opportunity to perform highly accurate quantitative measurements with a variety of optical microscopy tools.”
The researchers also demonstrated how this technique improves quantification accuracy. By freezing cells labeled with a fluorescent calcium ion probe, they were able to use exposure times 1000 times longer than practical in live-cell imaging, substantially increasing the measurement accuracy.
To capture transient biological events at precisely defined moments, the researcher integrated an electrically triggered cryogen injection system. With UV light stimulation to induce calcium ion waves, this system enabled freezing of the calcium ion waves at a specific time point after the initiation of the event, with 10 ms precision. This allowed the team to arrest transient biological processes with unprecedented temporal accuracy.
Finally, the team tuned their attention to combining different imaging techniques, which are often difficult to align in time. By the near-instantaneous freezing of samples, multiple imaging modalities can now be applied sequentially without worrying about temporal mismatch. In their study, the team combined spontaneous Raman microscopy and super-resolution fluorescence microscopy on the same cryofixed cells. This allowed them to view intricate cellular information from a number of perspectives at the exact same point in time.
This innovation opens new avenues for observing fast, transient cellular events, providing researchers with a powerful tool to explore the mechanisms underlying dynamic biological processes.
Fast animals get plenty of attention for their incredible feats of speed. But what about animals that move at a slower pace?
“We definitely are programmed to think that speed is good,” said James Maclaine, senior curator of fish at the Natural History Museum in London. “For a lot of animals, that doesn’t make any sense to them at all.”
So what is the world’s slowest animal? And what does survival look like when speed isn’t part of your skill set?
Slow sea movers
These may seem like simple questions, but speed can be defined in different ways. One way to understand and compare animals’ speeds is to consider the time it takes them to cover a particular distance. In that regard, the slowest animal could be the sea anemone, which creeps along at just 4 to 6 inches (10 to 25 cm) per hour (0.00006 to 0.00015 mph), usually when it’s searching for a new abode; otherwise, it remains stationary.
Not far behind this largely stationary creature isthe dwarf seahorse (Hippocampus zosterae), which is widely regarded as the slowest-swimming fish and one of the slowest animals in the world. Partly, that comes down to its upright swimming posture and its tiny dorsal fin, which has limited power to propel the seahorse through the water at that angle. “If you made it move, it would take it an hour to move a meter and a half [or 5 feet],” Maclaine told Live Science.
But this suits the seahorse quite well, as the creature spends most of its time tethered to its seagrass habitat by its long, prehensile tail, and eats tiny passing crustaceans. “Food comes to it, so that means it doesn’t need to be fast,” Maclaine explained. What’s more, these animals don’t have many predators because they’re well armored with defensive, bony plates and, therefore, have little need to escape.
Related:What is the fastest animal on Earth?
The only time these seahorses pick up their pace is when they’re ready to reproduce, Maclaine said. “This is really quite special, because they dance with each other … They sort of synchronize their movements.” The choreography can last hours, he added. “That courtship dance is the big seahorse movement.”
In the ocean’s deeper layers, the Greenland shark (Somniosus microcephalus) is a coldwater behemoth that can reach lengths of 24 feet (7.3 m). This ancient creature drifts along at an incredibly leisurely 2 mph 3 km/h. The Greenland shark lives in frigid waters where it scavenges on dead sea creatures. “You don’t need to move very fast for that, so it has slowed right down,” Maclaine said.
The Galápagos giant tortoise is super slow, walking roughly at about 0.16 mph (0.26 km/h). (Image credit: Jacob Poul Skoubo / 500px via Getty Images)
Locomotion on land
On land, the slowest-moving animal would likely be the banana slug, which moves at the extremely leisurely pace of 0.006 miles (0.0096 km) per hour, according to Jon Ablett, senior curator of molluscs at the Natural History Museum in London.
While it’s difficult to get definitive estimates on animal speeds, molluscs are notably slower than other animals, Ablett told Live Science in an email: “Some molluscs don’t move at all in their adult life, some bivalves are permanently sessile.” It’s not just that these animals are small, Ablett added. “They are slow moving in general — if you think of other groups like beetles, spiders or ants for example, they are small, often smaller than slugs and snails, but much faster.”
Despite this, there is a variety of speeds in the mollusc kingdom. For instance, the common garden snail (Cornu aspersum) glides along at a surprisingly speedy clip of 0.03miles (0.048 km) per hour, Ablett said.
Other standout slow movers on land are the Galápagos giant tortoise (Chelonoidis niger), a reptile with a limited range of speed, which also takes a long time to cover a short distance. These reptiles saunter along at about 0.16 mph (0.26 km/h). To put that into perspective, humans, who are similar in size, walk at about 2.8 mph (4.5 km/h).
Meanwhile, mammals that live in trees are among the slowest animals around. The slow lorises (Nycticebus) are a group of diminutive primates that, as their name suggests, move around in the trees at a gradual, deliberate pace, cautiously swiveling around their large eyes to observe the surrounding environment as they go. While they can stay motionless for hours, these creatures move at about 1.1 mph (1.8 km/h).
With a name like slow loris, it’s no surprise these primates go only about 1.1 mph (1.8 km/h). (Image credit: Freder via Getty Images)
Speed and size
There’s another way to measure speed, which is to factor in body size. Some biologists consider this a more accurate way to compare animals. Consider for example that a human can cover a much greater distance in one second than an ant can. Yet considering its tiny body, the ant is covering more distance and much faster, relative to its size, than we are.
A creature’s range of speed is another factor to think about when identifying the world’s slowest animal, said Rory Wilson, professor of aquatic biology and sustainable aquaculture at Swansea University in Wales. For example, some snakes may creep along almost imperceptibly but then rapidly lash out to ambush and catch their prey.
Factoring in these various traits, Wilson thinks that for the title of slowest animal there’s no contest for three-toed sloths (Bradypus).
“From the perspective of someone who studies animal movement in the broadest sense — not just getting from one tree to another, but also the speed of movement when they react to stimuli — it is really striking how slow sloths are,” Wilson told Live Science. These animals can hit speeds of 1 mph (1.6 km/h), but several estimates suggest it’s typically in the realm of just tens of meters.
In addition to taking a long time to cover little ground, sloths are worthy of the slowest-animal crown because all of their motions unfold at a glacial pace. “When I saw my first wild sloth, I couldn’t believe how slow it was,” Wilson said. “Everything is like tai chi.”
Like many other animals that live life at a relaxed tempo, sloths require some adaptations to compensate for the missing benefits of speed. Sloths have evolved to be masters of camouflage, because if they’re spotted by predators they have no ability to escape. These animals are also strikingly strong, with three times our human strength, giving them stability in the trees where nimbleness and speed might otherwise help keep them safely aloft.
The sloths’ unhurried pace is also connected to a slow metabolism that allows them to survive on small amounts of energy-poor food. It can take them days to digest their diet of leaves, and they descend from the trees just once a week to defecate.
“The question is, why would they be that slow? What do they get out of it?” Wilson said. The simple answer is that speed requires power, and power demands energy, which can be difficult and expensive to acquire, Wilson said. Sloths have managed to circumvent that need by thriving on very little — and that means a life in the slow lane. “If your whole lifestyle is ‘I’m chilling so I don’t need to eat much, I can eat rather poor quality food so I can digest it over days instead of hours, the energy return is very slow, and that’s OK because I’m very slow’ — it all works out extremely well,” Wilson explained.
Animal quiz: Test yourself on these fun animal trivia questions
For centuries, humans have gazed into the night sky, wondering what lies beyond the planets we know. Each new discovery in the Solar System reshapes our sense of place in the cosmos.
Now, astronomers are once again pointing to the possibility of an unseen world – one that may be orbiting far beyond Neptune. This hypothetical body has been given the tentative name “Planet Y.”
The idea of hidden planets is not new. Astronomers once speculated about Planet X, which was believed to be seven times Earth’s mass and orbiting 50 times farther from the Sun than Earth.
That idea was mostly debunked. Later came Planet Nine, a still-viable candidate about 10 times Earth’s mass, at least 300 times farther from the Sun. Now, evidence is mounting for yet another contender.
Warped orbits suggest hidden planet
Amir Siraj at Princeton University and his colleagues suggest a new possibility. They noticed a warping effect in the orbits of some Kuiper belt objects, a distant region filled with icy remnants, including Pluto.
“If that warp is real, the simplest explanation is an undiscovered inclined planet,” Siraj said.
This potential world would be smaller than Earth but larger than Mercury, orbiting 100 to 200 times farther from the Sun than Earth does. Its gravity seems to nudge nearby objects about 15 degrees out of the solar system’s flat plane, like ripples disturbing a lake’s surface.
“Our signal is modest, but credible,” Siraj said, estimating just a two to four percent chance of being a fluke. Early evidence for Planet Nine carried similar odds, though the signatures differ.
Planet Nine would tug objects toward it, while this “Planet Y” appears to tilt orbits out of alignment. In theory, both worlds could exist at once.
Unexplained Kuiper belt tilt
The new research shows that if no hidden planets exist, the average plane of the Kuiper belt should align with the invariable plane of the solar system.
However, astronomers now detect a clear warp between 80 and 200 astronomical units (AU).
This tilt is unlikely to be primordial, since natural orbital precession would erase it in less than 100 million years. For the warp to persist, something must be maintaining it – such as the gravity of a hidden planet.
Possible Planet Y scenarios
Jonti Horner at the University of Southern Queensland in Australia sees this as possible.
“It plays into the fact that we simply don’t know what’s out there. It’s only in the last couple of decades that we’ve really started to explore the space beyond Neptune,” he said.
Astronomers believe such planets might not have formed so far from the Sun. Instead, they could have been scattered outward early in the Solar System’s history. “Scattering seems more likely,” Horner said.
Models support Planet Y theory
Numerical experiments suggest that a planet with a mass between Mercury and Earth, an orbit of roughly 100 to 200 AU, and an inclination greater than 10 degrees could maintain the observed warp.
Lower-mass bodies like Pluto could contribute, but far less effectively. Planets more massive than Earth would cause distortions in nearer regions, making them poor fits for the data.
The proposed Planet Y differs from Planet Nine in both location and influence. Planet Nine, if real, is thought to explain the clustering of orbital paths at great distances. Planet Y, by contrast, would explain why the Kuiper belt’s average plane is warped.
“The signature is different,” Siraj said, emphasizing that both ideas could coexist without contradiction.
Search for hidden worlds continues
The outer solar system is one of astronomy’s greatest frontiers, and the next decade promises breakthroughs.
The Vera C. Rubin Observatory will soon begin its 10-year survey, mapping the night sky in unprecedented detail. This facility could spot Planet Y directly or confirm indirect signs of its influence.
“Rubin will rapidly expand the catalog of well-measured trans-Neptunian objects,” Siraj said. If Planet Y exists, “within the survey’s first few years” we may either see it or gather stronger proof of its gravitational effects.
For now, Planet Y remains hypothetical, a hint drawn from subtle orbital patterns. But history shows that careful attention to small irregularities can reveal great discoveries.
From Neptune’s prediction in the 19th century to Pluto’s identification in the 20th, the search for hidden worlds has always reshaped our cosmic understanding. If Planet Y is real, it may soon step from speculation into fact.
The study is published in arXiv.
—–
Like what you read? Subscribe to our newsletter for engaging articles, exclusive content, and the latest updates.
Check us out on EarthSnap, a free app brought to you by Eric Ralls and Earth.com.
The US Space Force’s experimental X-37B spaceplane is back in orbit. The reusable Boeing-built platform launched late on August 21, 2025, atop a SpaceX Falcon 9 from Florida’s Kennedy Space Center, kicking off its eighth mission in 15 years of operations.
The uncrewed vehicle separated from the rocket’s upper stage as planned and entered low Earth orbit, roughly 500 kilometers (310 miles) above the surface. Mission details remain classified, but the US Space Force has confirmed that the spaceplane will test a mix of navigation, communications, and payload-handling technologies.
From rapid turnaround to rapid testing
The launch comes less than six months after the X-37B completed its seventh mission, which ended with a landing at Vandenberg Space Force Base in California on March 7, 2025. That mission included a first-of-its-kind aerobraking maneuver that allowed the vehicle to change orbit while saving propellant.
This quick turnaround also highlights the X-37B’s growing role as an operationally ready testbed for new military and commercial space technologies.
Bigger payloads, more experiments
For this eighth flight, Boeing has added a redesigned service module that expands the spaceplane’s payload capacity. The upgrade allows the Space Force and its partners, including the US Air Force Research Laboratory and the Defense Innovation Unit, to run more complex experiments simultaneously.
Among the payloads are two key technologies. The first is a high-bandwidth laser communications system, part of the US Space Force’s push to link satellites and space assets through resilient, high-speed networks.
The second is a quantum inertial sensor, designed to deliver precise navigation data in GPS-denied environments. If proven reliable in orbit, the technology could eventually support missions in contested orbital zones or even deep-space exploration where GPS signals are unavailable.
A platform that keeps evolving
Since its debut, the X-37B has spent over 4,200 cumulative days in space, returning after every flight for inspection, upgrades, and mission planning. That reusability has made it a critical asset for testing and refining technologies faster than traditional satellite platforms allow.
Each successive mission has offered a glimpse into how the US Space Force sees the future of orbital operations: a mix of reusable platforms, rapid iteration, and resilient systems designed to survive and operate in increasingly contested space.
The mystery at Jupiter’s heart has taken a fresh twist – as new research suggests a giant impact may not have been responsible for the formation of its core.
It had been thought that a colossal collision with an early planet containing half of Jupiter’s core material could have mixed up the central region of the gas giant, enough to explain its interior today.
But a new study published in Monthly Notices of the Royal Astronomical Society suggests its make-up is actually down to how the growing planet absorbed heavy and light materials as it formed and evolved.
Unlike what scientists once expected, the core of the largest planet in our solar system doesn’t have a sharp boundary but instead gradually blends into the surrounding layers of mostly hydrogen – a structure known as a dilute core.
How this dilute core formed has been a key question among scientists and astronomers ever since NASA’s Juno spacecraft first revealed its existence.
Using cutting-edge supercomputer simulations of planetary impacts, with a new method to improve the simulation’s treatment of mixing between materials, researchers from Durham University, in collaboration with scientists from NASA, SETI, and CENSSS, University of Oslo, tested whether a massive collision could have created Jupiter’s dilute core.
The simulations were run on the DiRAC COSMA supercomputer hosted at Durham University using the state-of-the-art SWIFT open-source software.
The study found that a stable dilute core structure was not produced in any of the simulations conducted, even in those involving impacts under extreme conditions.
Instead, the simulations demonstrate that the dense rock and ice core material displaced by an impact would quickly re-settle, leaving a distinct boundary with the outer layers of hydrogen and helium, rather than forming a smooth transition zone between the two regions.
Reflecting on the findings, lead author of the study Dr Thomas Sandnes, of Durham University, said: “It’s fascinating to explore how a giant planet like Jupiter would respond to one of the most violent events a growing planet can experience.
“We see in our simulations that this kind of impact literally shakes the planet to its core – just not in the right way to explain the interior of Jupiter that we see today.”
Jupiter isn’t the only planet with a dilute core, as scientists have recently found evidence that Saturn has one too.
Dr Luis Teodoro, of the University of Oslo, said: “The fact that Saturn also has a dilute core strengthens the idea that these structures are not the result of rare, extremely high-energy impacts but instead form gradually during the long process of planetary growth and evolution.”
The findings of this study could also help inform scientists’ understanding and interpretation of the many Jupiter- and Saturn-sized exoplanets that have been observed around distant stars. If dilute cores aren’t made by rare and extreme impacts, then perhaps most or all of these planets have comparably complex interiors.
Co-author of the study Dr Jacob Kegerreis said: “Giant impacts are a key part of many planets’ histories, but they can’t explain everything!
“This project also accelerated another step in our development of new ways to simulate these cataclysmic events in ever greater detail, helping us to continue narrowing down how the amazing diversity of worlds we see in the Solar System and beyond came to be.”
NASA has now postponed the launch of its TOMEX+ sounding rocket mission for the sixth time, and this time, there is no set date for the launch. The TOMEX+ is a mission with the goal of tracking turbulence in the Earth’s mesopause.
The TOMEX+ mission was initially scheduled to launch on August 18, but has since been rescheduled 6 times for a host of reasons. Here is a detailed breakdown of all postponements.
August 17: The planned August 18 launch was cancelled and then scheduled for August 19, due to “expected cloud cover in the area and down range camera sites.”
August 18: It was again rescheduled for August 21, due to high sea states from Hurricane Erin and cloud cover in the area.
August 19: It was rescheduled for August 22, due to high sea states in the recovery area as an aftereffect of Hurricane Erin and cloud cover.
August 20: The mission was rescheduled, this time for August 23, due to high sea states in the recovery area caused by Hurricane Erin.
August 21: It was rescheduled to August 24 for the same reason it was rescheduled on August 20.
August 22: It was indefinitely rescheduled due to persisting high sea states in the recovery area and cloud cover.
NASA is now looking to fix a new date this week for the launch attempt. The launch window for the mission opened on August 18 and is scheduled to close on September 3. The TOMEX+ mission consists of three rockets, two of which will release vapor tracers — comparable to colorful smoke — which can then be studied to trace wind patterns. The third rocket, which will be launched about 5 minutes after the first two, will carry a lidar instrument which will measure atmospheric density and motion over time.
Sounding rocket missions are short missions that usually last between 2–20 minutes. They are especially important for studying the mesopause — a layer of Earth’s atmosphere inaccessible to satellites and weather balloons alike.
Chibuike Okpara – Tech Writer – 138 articles published on Notebookcheck since 2024
I have always been fascinated by technology and digital devices my entire life and even got addicted to it. I have always marveled at the intricacy of even the simplest digital devices and systems around us. I have been writing and publishing articles online for about 6 years now, just about a year ago, I found myself lost in the marvel of smartphones and laptops we have in our hands every day. I developed a passion for learning about new devices and technologies that come with them and at some point, I asked myself, “Why not get into writing tech articles?” It is useless to say I followed up the idea — it is evident. I am an open-minded individual who derives an infinite amount of joy from researching and discovering new information, I believe there is so much to learn and such a short life to live, so I put my time to good use — learning new things. I am a ‘bookworm’ of the internet and digital devices. When I am not writing, you will find me on my devices still, I do explore and admire the beauty of nature and creatures. I am a fast learner and quickly adapt to changes, always looking forward to new adventures.
On Mars, the past is written in stone — but the present is written in sand. Last week, Perseverance explored inactive megaripples to learn more about the wind-driven processes that are reshaping the Martian landscape every day.
After wrapping up its investigation at the contact between clay and olivine-bearing rocks at “Westport,” Perseverance is journeying south once more. Previously, attempts were made to drive uphill to visit a new rock exposure called “Midtoya.” However, a combination of the steep slope and rubbly, rock-strewn soil made drive progress difficult, and after several attempts, the decision was made to return to smoother terrain. Thankfully, the effort wasn’t fruitless, as the rover was able to gather data on new spherule-rich rocks thought to have rolled downhill from “Midtoya,” including the witch hat or helmet-shaped rock “Horneflya,” which has attracted much online interest.
More recently, Perseverance explored a site called “Kerrlaguna” where the steep slopes give way to a field of megaripples: large windblown sand formations up to 1 meter (about 3 feet) tall. The science team chose to perform a mini-campaign to make a detailed study of these features. Why such interest? While often the rover’s attention is focused on studying processes in Mars’ distant past that are recorded in ancient rocks, we still have much to learn about the modern Martian environment.
Almost a decade ago, Perseverance’s forerunner Curiosity studied an active sand dune at “Namib Dune” on the floor of Gale crater, where it took a memorable selfie. However the smaller megaripples — and especially dusty, apparently no longer active ones like at “Kerrlaguna” — are also common across the surface of Mars. These older immobile features could teach us new insights about the role that wind and water play on the modern Martian surface.
After arriving near several of these inactive megaripples, Perseverance performed a series of measurements using its SuperCam, Mastcam-Z, and MEDA science instruments in order to characterize the surrounding environment, the size and chemistry of the sand grains, and any salty crusts that may have developed over time.
Besides furthering our understanding of the Martian environment, documenting these potential resources could help us prepare for the day when astronauts explore the Red Planet and need resources held within Martian soils to help them survive. It is hoped that this investigation at “Kerrlaguna” can provide a practice run for a more comprehensive campaign located at a more extensive field of larger bedforms at “Lac de Charmes,” further along the rover traverse.
Written by Melissa Rice, Professor of Planetary Science at Western Washington University
For more than a century, scientists have known that Earth is constantly bombarded by cosmic rays, charged particles with staggering energies, far beyond what our accelerators can produce.
Yet their origins have remained hidden because cosmic rays are bent and scattered by magnetic fields during their journey across space.
Neutrinos, however, offer a way around this barrier. These ghostly particles rarely interact with matter and fly in straight lines from their sources. If we can trace where they come from, we can finally discover the source of cosmic rays. At the South Pole, the IceCube Neutrino Observatory, an immense detector buried deep under the ice, has been built to do just that.
Neutrinos are “ideal candidates for searching for the sources of cosmic radiation because they travel a more or less direct path from their source to Earth. There, they can be detected by IceCube,” the Ruhr University Bochum (RUB) team notes.
Researchers at RUB have created a new algorithm using which IceCube can now pinpoint neutrinos with far greater speed and accuracy than before.
A trick to improve neutrino path reconstruction
IceCube works by watching for the rare moment when a neutrino collides with an atom in Antarctic ice. Such a collision produces a flash of blue light. By comparing the timing and brightness of these flashes, scientists can reconstruct the neutrino’s path and work out where in the sky it came from.
Until now, however, these reconstructions were relatively rough, leaving astronomers with wide patches of sky to search, too large to reliably catch passing cosmic flares.
The RUB researcher changed that by overhauling IceCube’s analysis pipeline. Their system now issues an initial reconstruction in about 30 seconds, giving a quick estimate of the neutrino’s direction and energy that can be sent immediately to telescopes worldwide.
“We need 30 seconds to calculate the energy and direction of a neutrino, and immediately disseminate the information worldwide,” Anna Franckowiak, one of the researchers at RUB, said.
Then a slower, more detailed calculation follows, refining the trajectory with much greater precision. Depending on how much energy the neutrino leaves behind in the ice, the system switches between two mathematical approaches.
For lower-energy events, one method called SplineMPE provides sharp sky locations, while for higher-energy tracks, another method, Millipede Wilks, handles the complicated and irregular energy losses better. This hybrid strategy means astronomers get the best possible reconstruction for each event.
As a result, the regions of sky where a neutrino is thought to have come from are now about five times smaller for the 50 percent confidence area (the patch of sky from where neutrinos likely come), and about four times smaller for the 90 percent area, compared with the older system.
Checking previously suggested sources
The team didn’t stop at new detections. They re-analyzed more than a decade of IceCube’s archived alerts using the same improved methods, creating a cleaner and more reliable catalog.
This process showed how important precision is. For instance, some earlier associations, such as hints that neutrinos were linked to tidal disruption events (TDE), where black holes rip apart passing stars, disappeared once the paths were recalculated.
“After we improved our algorithm for trajectory reconstruction, we analyzed the events again, and the neutrino paths don’t match the positions where the tidal disruption events occurred,” Franckowiak said.
At the same time, the reanalysis uncovered a striking new clue. Two neutrinos, each carrying about 100 trillion electron volts of energy, were both consistent with having come from the same source, NGC 7469, a galaxy with an active core about 220 million light-years away.
“We estimate the possible neutrino flux from NGC 7469 under different assumptions. The result leaves open the possibility that either one or both of the neutrinos originated from the source,” the researchers note in their study.
The coincidence is intriguing, however, not conclusive. Other analysis suggest the strength of the signal depends on which reconstruction values are used, so for now the finding remains a promising but unproven lead.
Being able to trace neutrinos with this level of speed and accuracy is a turning point for high-energy astronomy. For the first time, astronomers can respond almost immediately when a neutrino is detected, pointing telescopes toward the right spot in the sky before a flare fades away.
If repeat detections are confirmed from the same object, whether it be an active galaxy like NGC 7469, a star-forming region, or another exotic source, it would finally reveal the long-sought birthplaces of cosmic rays.
Such a discovery would not only solve a century-old mystery but also expand our understanding of black holes and exploding stars.
This research is covered in three papers. You can read them here, here, and here.