Category: 2. World

  • SCO’s growing significance built on mutual trust, equality: ambassador – Newspaper

    SCO’s growing significance built on mutual trust, equality: ambassador – Newspaper

    ISLAMABAD: Pakistan’s ambassador to China Khalil Hashmi on Friday highlighted the SCO’s growing significance as a leading regional organisation built on mutual trust, equality, dialogue, and shared development embodied in the ‘Shanghai Spirit.

    Speaking at a seminar, he noted that under President Xi Jinping’s leadership, the SCO had gained fresh momentum with an enhanced focus on cooperation, connectivity, digital transformation and green development.

    Ambassador Hashmi emphasized Pakistan’s strong commitment to the SCO as a vital platform for countering terrorism and extremism, ensuring peace and security, and advancing sustainable development.

    He underlined the centrality of CPEC as not only a bilateral undertaking but also a bridge for wider SCO regional integration.

    Reaffirming the ‘iron brotherhood’ between Pakistan and China as the cornerstone of Pakistan’s foreign policy, he expressed confidence that the upcoming Tianjin Summit would renew collective commitments to regional peace, prosperity, and the ‘Shanghai Spirit’.

    The China-Pakistan Study Centre (CPSC) at the Institute of Strategic Studies Islamabad (ISSI) hosted a seminar on Friday titled “SCO’s ‘China Year 2025’: Upholding the ‘Shanghai Spirit’.

    Ambassador Farhat Ayesha, Pakistan’s National Coordinator for SCO, delivered the keynote address, while Ambassador Khalil Hashmi was the Guest of Honour.

    Other speakers included Ambassador Babar Amin, Pakistan’s former National Coordinator for SCO, Dr. MA Bin from Fudan University China, Dr Ma Zheng from Sun Yat-sen University China, and Dr. Hassan Daud Butt from Bahria University.

    In her keynote address, Ambassador Farhat Ayesha noted that SCO’s “China Year 2025” marked a defining moment in the organization’s trajectory. She praised China’s far-sighted approach and active role in constructive engagement, dialogue, and cooperation within the SCO framework.

    She stressed that China’s leadership has strengthened the SCO’s standing as a vital multilateral platform and expanded its scope towards new areas such as poverty reduction, climate resilience, digital economy, and connectivity.

    She underlined Pakistan’s strong commitment to the SCO since becoming a full member in 2017 and highlighted the deep alignment between Pakistan’s foreign policy objectives and the principles enshrined in the UN Charter, the SCO Charter, and international law.

    In his welcome remarks, Ambassador Sohail Mahmood, Director General ISSI, underscored the SCO’s remarkable evolution into one of the world’s most comprehensive and dynamic multilateral platforms, calling it a compelling example of multilateralism in action.

    He emphasised that in an era of intensifying geopolitical tensions, the ‘Shanghai Spirit’ offers an alternative vision of cooperation — dialogue rather than dominance, consensus rather than confrontation, and collective prosperity rather than unilateral gains.

    He noted that with nearly half the world’s population and a quarter of global GDP, the SCO’s global salience is firmly established. Highlighting China’s Presidency in 2024-25, he pointed to Foreign Minister Wang Yi’s five-point roadmap as a forward-looking plan rooted in the Shanghai Spirit, encompassing solidarity, collective security, win-win economic cooperation, and equitable global governance.

    Hailing China’s proactive and innovative approach, Ambassador Sohail Mahmood expressed the confidence that the upcoming 25th SCO Summit in Tianjin, China, on August 31-September 1 would adopt a long-term development strategy and other documents, charting the SCO’s course for the next decade and reinforcing its role in promoting peace, stability, and prosperity across Eurasia.

    Ambassador Babar Amin highlighted China’s instrumental role in facilitating Pakistan’s integration into the SCO and noted the upcoming Tianjin Summit as the largest-ever gathering of SCO members.

    He appreciated China’s efforts in advancing cooperation aligned with President Xi Jinping’s Global Development Initiative, covering poverty alleviation, food security, health, climate change, industrialization, digital economy, and connectivity.

    Published in Dawn, August 23rd, 2025

    Continue Reading

  • The Donbas ‘fortress belt’: why does it matter? – Newspaper

    The Donbas ‘fortress belt’: why does it matter? – Newspaper

    KYIV: The Donbas, a large area of eastern Ukraine bordering Russia, is at the centre of US-mediated peace talks between Moscow and Kyiv.

    Moscow has demanded that Kyiv concede the whole area, which is made up of the Donetsk and Lugansk regions, even though Russian forces still do not fully control the territory.

    Ukraine has ruled out giving it up, pointing out that Russia has been unable to capture the Donbas completely, despite years of trying.

    Here’s what one needs to know about the important strategic stronghold:

    What is the Donbas?

    The Donbas, named after the Donets River and its coal basin, covers an area larger than Switzerland and represents about nine per cent of Ukraine’s whole territory.

    The region has been at war since the start of a Moscow-backed separatist insurgency in 2014.

    It is hard to assess how many people live there now, but according to the last census from 2001, the population stood at six million in the two regions. The Donbas is a traditionally majority Russian-speaking area, though many Ukrainian speakers live there as well.

    According to the US-based Institute for the Study of War, Russia holds 79 per cent of the Donetsk region and almost all of the Lugansk region. Ukraine has said Russia controls 67-69pc of the Donetsk region, which has emerged as the focal point for peace talks.

    The fortress belt

    The Russian advance is threatening Ukrainian fortifications in the Donetsk region that Kyiv has been consistently building up since 2014.

    The ISW said Ukraine has built a “fortress belt” stretching from the towns of Slovyansk and Kramatorsk, in the north, down to Kostyantynivka and Druzhkivka, in the south.

    “Ukraine has spent the last 11 years pouring time, money, and effort into reinforcing the fortress belt,” ISW said.

    It added that “Russian forces currently have no means of rapidly enveloping or penetrating” the chain of fortifications and it would likely take them years to do so.

    Since the start of Russia’s invasion in 2022, Moscow has managed to conquer about one-third of the Donetsk region. The Donbas also has a special meaning for President Volodymyr Zelensky, whose grandfather fought in the Soviet army in the area against the Nazis in 1943, as did many other Ukrainians.The Donetsk region has also seen some of the war’s bloodiest battles against Russia, such as in Mariupol, Bakhmut and Avdiivka.

    Resources

    Historically, the Donbas has been known for coal mining and industry, but another type of resource there is gaining attention.

    The region is rich in raw minerals, such as lithium, uranium, titanium and rare earths, but many of them remain untapped in the occupied or embattled territories.

    In May, Washington and Kyiv signed a minerals deal that allows the United States to exploit Ukraine’s rare earth and other deposits.

    What’s next?

    Giving up Donbas could have devastating consequences for Ukraine’s future security.

    It “would open the gate to a future deeper invasion of Ukraine”, said Andreas Umland, a Kyiv-based analyst from the Stockholm Centre for Eastern European Studies.

    Published in Dawn, August 23rd, 2025

    Continue Reading

  • Sri Lankan ex-president arrested in anti-graft crackdown – Newspaper

    Sri Lankan ex-president arrested in anti-graft crackdown – Newspaper

    COLOMBO: Sri Lankan police arrested former president Ranil Wickremesinghe on Friday, making him the most senior opposition figure to be detained under an anti-corruption crackdown by the new leftist government.

    He was remanded in custody soon after being arrested. “The suspect (Wickremesinghe) will be held in custody till Tuesday, but considering his medical condition he could be admitted to the prison hospital or another hospital,” Magistrate Nilupuli Lankapura said while ordering his remand.

    Wickremesinghe, whose lawyers said was suffering from heart disease and diabetes, was charged under the Public Property Act and two counts of the penal code — “dishonest misappropriation of property” and “criminal breach of trust”.

    The offences carry a maximum punishment of 20 years in jail and a fine not exceeding three times the value of misappropriated funds.

    Sri Lanka’s anti-graft units have led the crackdown since President Anura Kumara Dissanayake came to power in September on a promise to fight corruption.

    Wickremesinghe, 76, who lost the last election to Dissanayake, was taken into custody after being questioned about a September 2023 visit to London to attend a ceremony for his wife at a British university, a police detective told AFP.

    Wickremesinghe had stopped in London in 2023 on his way back from Havana, where he attended a G77 summit.

    His office had previously denied that he abused his position to visit London.

    Three of his then senior aides were questioned this month by the Criminal Investigation Department (CID).

    He and his wife, Maithree, attended a University of Wolverhampton ceremony where she was conferred an honorary professorship.

    Wickremesinghe had maintained that his wife’s travel expenses were met by her and that no state funds were used.

    However, the CID alleged that Wickremesinghe used government money for his travel on a private visit and that his bodyguards were also paid by the state.

    Wickremesinghe became president in July 2022 for the remainder of Gotabaya Rajapaksa’s term after Rajapaksa stepped down following months of street protests over alleged corruption and mismanagement.

    IMF bailout

    Wickremesinghe secured a $2.9 billion bailout from the International Monetary Fund (IMF) in early 2023 and was credited with stabilising the economy after the country’s worst-ever financial meltdown in 2022. He doubled taxes and removed energy subsidies as part of tough austerity measures to raise state revenue. He lost his re-election bid in September but remained a key opposition figure despite his coalition holding only two seats in the 225-member parliament.

    Key opposition politicians, including two former senior ministers, have been jailed for up to 25 years for corruption since the new leftist government took office.

    Several members of former president Mahinda Rajapaksa’s family have also been charged with misusing state funds and are being prosecuted. Many of them are currently on bail pending court hearings.

    Dissanayake’s government earlier this month impeached the police chief after accusing him of running a criminal network that supported politicians.

    Published in Dawn, August 23rd, 2025

    Continue Reading

  • Iran, Europeans agree to meet as sanctions deadline nears – World

    Iran, Europeans agree to meet as sanctions deadline nears – World

    • France says ‘time running out’ for Tehran nuclear talks
    • Iranian FM Araghchi warns of snapback ‘consequences’

    TEHRAN: Iran will meet next week with Britain, France and Germany on its nuclear programme, the parties said on Friday, as the European powers warned Tehran to engage swiftly to avoid snapback sanctions.

    The Islamic republic suspended cooperation with the International Atomic Energy Agency in July in the wake of its 12-day war with Israel, citing the UN nuclear watchdog’s failure to condemn Israeli and US strikes on its nuclear facilities.

    The European trio — parties to the landmark 2015 Iran nuclear deal — have threatened to trigger a “snapback mechanism” by the end of August.

    The move would reimpose sweeping UN sanctions lifted under the 2015 agreement unless Iran agrees to curb its uranium enrichment and restore cooperation with IAEA inspectors.

    “It was agreed that Iran’s talks with the three European countries and the European Union would continue next Tuesday at the level of deputy foreign ministers,” Iran’s foreign ministry said after a phone call between Foreign Minister Abbas Araghchi and senior European diplomats.

    France confirmed the talks and cautioned that Iran faced a narrowing window of time. “We have just made an important call to our Iranian counterpart regarding the nuclear programme and the sanctions against Iran that we are preparing to reimpose,” said French Foreign Minister Jean-Noel Barrot on X, noting he was joined on the call by his British and German counterparts and the EU’s top diplomat.

    “Time is running out. A new meeting will take place next week on this issue,” he added.

    German Foreign Minister Johann Wadephul said on X that his country remained “committed to diplomacy but time is very short”.

    “Iran needs to engage substantively in order to avoid the activation of snapback,” he said. “We have been clear that we will not let the snapback of sanctions expire unless there is a verifiable and durable deal.”

    The EU’s foreign policy chief, Kaja Kallas, made a similar statement. “With the deadline for the snapback mechanism fast approaching, Iran’s readiness to engage with the US is crucial. Iran must also fully cooperate” with the IAEA, she said.

    It was not immediately clear where the talks, the second since the Iran-Israel war, would take place.

    Snapback ‘consequences’

    Iran and the European trio — known as the E3 — held talks in late July at the Iranian consulate in Istanbul, which Tehran described as “frank”.

    Iran’s 12-day war with Israel derailed its nuclear negotiations with the United States and saw it suspend cooperation with the IAEA.

    The 2015 nuclear deal was aimed preventing Iran from developing an atomic bomb — an ambition it has consistently denied.

    The deal was torpedoed in 2018 when Donald Trump, during his first term as US president, unilaterally withdrew the United States from the agreement and slapped crippling sanctions on its economy.

    Iran has ever since criticised Europe over failing to meet its commitments under the deal.

    Araghchi reiterated on Friday the “lack of legal and moral competence of these countries to resort to the said mechanism” while warning about “the consequences of such an action”.

    Iran has previously said it would leave the non-proliferation treaty — or NPT — if the mechanism, envisaged in the nuclear deal, is activated by the European parties.

    The deadline for activating the mechanism ends in October, though Europeans have set an internal target of the end of August to trigger it if diplomacy fails. They have also offered an extension to buy time for talks.

    Araghchi said that “this is a decision that must essentially be taken by the United Nations Security Council; and while the Islamic Republic of Iran has its own principled positions and views in this regard, it is not involved in this process.”

    The foreign minister said earlier this month that Iran was working with China and Russia to prevent the snapback of sanctions.

    Published in Dawn, August 23rd, 2025

    Continue Reading

  • Israel blamed for causing famine in Gaza City – World

    Israel blamed for causing famine in Gaza City – World

    • UN announcement is only the fifth-ever official declaration of famine, and the first outside Africa
    • Hunger monitor says similar conditions expected in Deir el-Balah and Khan Yunis by next month
    • Hamas demands opening of Gaza crossings after UN, IPC declaration
    • Israel cries foul as world holds it responsible for ‘man-made’ calamity

    ROME: The United Nations on Friday officially declared a famine in Gaza City, the first time it has done so in the Middle East, with exp­­e­rts warning that over half a million people faced catastrophic hunger.

    “It is a famine: the Gaza famine,” said Tom Fletcher, the UN’s emergency relief coordinator, as the Integrated Food Security Phase Classification (IPC) panel found famine was now present in and around Gaza City.

    He blamed Israel, accusing it of “systematic obstruction” of aid deliveries to the war-ravaged Palestinian territory.

    Israeli Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu slammed the UN-backed report as “an outright lie”, while the foreign ministry insisted: “There is no famine in Gaza.”

    The IPC defines famine as occurring when 20 per cent of households have an extreme lack of food; 30pc of children under five are acutely malnourished; and at least two in every 10,000 people die daily from outright starvation or from malnutrition and disease.

    UN agencies have long been war­n­ing of the deteriorating huma­nita­rian situation in Gaza, particularly as Israel steps up its offensive in the besieged and war-torn enclave.

    The Rome-based IPC said that “as of 15 August 2025, famine (IPC Phase 5) — with reasonable evidence — is confirmed in Gaza governorate”.

    The UN estimates that nearly one million people currently live in the Gaza governorate.

    It was the first time the IPC has recorded famine outside of Africa, and the global group predicted that famine conditions would spread to the central and southern areas of Deir al-Balah and Khan Yunis by the end of next month.

    The IPC previously concluded that there was famine in areas of Somalia in 2011, South Sudan in 2017 and 2020, and Sudan in 2024.

    A famine was projected in Yemen in 2018, but never officially confirmed, des­pite the humanitarian crisis in the country.

    ‘Man-made’

    According to figures from Gaza’s Health Ministry, verified by the World Health Organisation, deaths from malnutrition and starvation are spiking.

    In the first seven months of the year, 89 fatalities were attributed to malnutrition or starvation, mostly children and teens. Just in August, there have been at least 138 deaths, including 25 minors, the ministry said on Friday.

    The IPC said the famine in Gaza was “entirely man-made”, driven by a sharp escalation of the conflict in July, massive displacement of people since mid-March and restricted access to food.

    In early March, Israel completely banned aid supplies from Gaza, before allowing very limited quantities to enter at the end of May, leading to severe shortages of food, medicine and fuel.

    Speaking to reporters in Geneva, Fletcher said the famine should “haunt us all”.

    “It is a famine that we could have prevented if we had been allowed. Yet food stacks up at borders because of systematic obstruction by Israel,” he said.

    UN rights chief Volker Turk said “it is a war crime to use starvation as a method of warfare”.

    UN Secretary-General Antonio Guterres renewed calls for an immediate ceasefire and full humanitarian access to Gaza, adding: “We cannot allow this situation to continue with impunity.”

    The International Red Cross described the declaration of famine as “devastating and entirely foreseeable”.

    “Under international humanitarian law, Israel, as the occupying power, must ensure that the basic needs of the civilian population in Gaza are met,” it said in a statement.

    Outrage

    Hamas called on Friday for an immediate end to the war in Gaza and the lifting of the Israeli siege on the territory.

    In a statement published online, the group called for “immediate action by the UN and the security council to stop the war and lift the siege” and demanded that crossings be opened “without restrictions to allow the urgent and continuous entry of food, medicine, water and fuel”.

    It said the declaration by the UN confirmed the “humanitarian catastrophe” in Gaza — but lamented that it came far too late.

    Britain’s Foreign Secretary David Lammy on Friday condemned the famine in Gaza as a “moral outrage” and a “man-made catastrophe”.

    Calling it “utterly horrifying and wholly preventable”, he called on Israel to take urgent action to remedy the situation.

    “We are seeing the worst possible humanitarian catastrophe that we can even measure,” said Jeanette Bailey, a child nutrition lead at the International Rescue Committee, a New York-based aid organisation.

    ‘Too weak to cry’

    In July alone, more than 12,000 children were identified as acutely malnourished – a six-fold increase since January, according to UN agencies.

    “The signs were unmistakable: children with wasted bodies, too weak to cry or eat, babies dying from hunger and preventable disease,” said Unicef Executive Director Catherine Russell.

    The local food system has collapsed, with an estimated 98pc of cropland in the Gaza Strip either damaged, inaccessible or both, the IPC said.

    Meanwhile, livestock is decimated and fishing is banned.

    The IPC said conditions in the North Gaza Governorate, north of Gaza City, may well be worse, but said it did not have enough data.

    Published in Dawn, August 23rd, 2025

    Continue Reading

  • Donald Trump has renewed a threat to impose sanctions on Russia if there is no progress toward a peaceful settlement in Ukraine in two weeks, showing frustration at Moscow a week after his meeting with Vladimir Putin in Alaska.
    “I’m going to make a decision as to what we do and it’s going to be, it’s going to be a very important decision, and that’s whether or not it’s massive sanctions or massive tariffs or both, or we do nothing and say it’s your fight,” the US president said on Friday. He said he was unhappy about Russia’s strike on an American factory in Ukraine this week, which caused a fire that injured some of the facility’s employees.

  • At the same White House event where he mentioned possible sanctions, he showed a photograph of his meeting with Putin on the red carpet in Alaska, saying Putin wanted to attend the World Cup 2026 football tournament in the US. “I’m going to sign this for him. But I was sent one, and I thought you would like to see it, it’s a man named Vladimir Putin, who I believe will be coming, depending on what happens. He may be coming, and he may not, depending on what happens,” Trump said.

  • The Ukrainian president, Volodymyr Zelenskyy, meanwhile said Russia was doing everything it could to prevent a meeting between him and Putin. Zelenskyy has repeatedly called for Putin to meet him, saying it is the only way to negotiate an end to the war. He accused Russia of stalling. “The meeting is one of the components of how to end the war,” he said on Friday at a press conference in Kyiv with Nato secretary general Mark Rutte. “And since they don’t want to end it, they will look for space to [avoid it].”

  • Russia’s foreign minister, Sergei Lavrov, told NBC there was no agenda for such a summit. “Putin is ready to meet with Zelenskyy when the agenda would be ready for a summit. And this agenda is not ready at all,” he said.

  • During a visit to a nuclear research centre on Friday, Putin said Trump’s leadership qualities would help restore US-Russia relations. “With the arrival of President Trump, I think that a light at the end of the tunnel has finally loomed. And now we had a very good, meaningful and frank meeting in Alaska,” Putin said.

  • Ukraine has attacked a key pumping station on the Druzhba oil pipeline bringing fuel to Europe from Russia, Deborah Cole reports. The attack knocked out supplies to Hungary and Slovakia, the only remaining EU member states still receiving Russian oil. The Hungarian and Slovakian governments wrote to the European Commission after the attack, saying that Russian oil supplies could be suspended for at least five days owing to the damage. “The physical and geographical reality is that without this pipeline, the safe supply of our countries is simply not possible,” their foreign ministers, Péter Szijjártó and Juraj Blanár, said in a letter.

  • The Russian warlord and businessman Yevgeny Prigozhin looked “doomed” after his failed mutiny and told his mother he expected to die in the days before his private plane crash, Pjotr Sauer reports. Prigozhin, the founder of the notorious Wagner mercenary group, died when his business jet went down in the summer of 2023, two months after his fighters briefly seized control of the southern city of Rostov-on-Don and advanced towards Moscow in a short-lived rebellion against Russia’s military leadership. “When I last saw him, he looked doomed,” said Violetta Prigozhina, 85, in an interview with the Russian outlet Fontanka.

Continue Reading

  • CPEC integration to benefit Kabul immensely

    CPEC integration to benefit Kabul immensely


    LAHORE:

    The China-Pakistan Economic Corridor (CPEC) is poised to open vast avenues for socio-economic development and regional connectivity for Afghanistan, stated Zafar Iqbal, Acting President of the Pakistan-China Joint Chamber of Commerce and Industry (PCJCCI), during a think-tank session held at the PCJCCI Secretariat.

    He emphasised that CPEC would be a game changer for Afghanistan as it emerges as a central hub in the evolving trade and transit ecosystem in the region.

    With Uzbekistan, Tajikistan and other Central Asian Republics planning to utilise Gwadar Port, Afghanistan stands to benefit immensely from transit trade, connectivity and infrastructure investment. “Afghanistan is no longer a landlocked country; with CPEC, it becomes a land-linked trade corridor between Central Asia, South Asia and the Middle East,” Iqbal remarked.

    Continue Reading

  • Trump again mulls Russia sanctions as Ukraine peace remains elusive one week after Alaska summit | Ukraine

    Trump again mulls Russia sanctions as Ukraine peace remains elusive one week after Alaska summit | Ukraine

    Donald Trump renewed a threat to impose sanctions on Russia if there was no progress toward a peaceful settlement in Ukraine, as Moscow said there remained “no meeting planned” between Vladimir Putin and Volodymyr Zelenskyy.

    “I’m going to make a decision as to what we do and it’s going to be a very important decision, and that’s whether or not it’s massive sanctions or massive tariffs or both, or we do nothing and say it’s your fight,” Trump said, showing apparent frustration at Moscow a week after his meeting with Putin in Alaska.

    The president said he was unhappy about a Russian strike on an American factory in Ukraine this week, which caused a fire that injured some of the facility’s employees.

    The Ukrainian president said on Friday that Russia was doing everything it could to prevent a meeting between him and Putin.

    Trump had said he had begun the arrangements for a Putin-Zelenskty meeting after a call with the Russian leader on Monday that followed their Alaska meeting, while Zelenskyy has repeatedly called for Putin to meet him, saying it is the only way to negotiate an end to the war.

    Donald Trump holds a photograph of him with Vladimir Putin in Alaska. Photograph: Chip Somodevilla/Getty Images

    Russia’s foreign minister, Sergei Lavrov, told NBC there was no meeting planned, but Putin was “ready to meet with Zelenskyy when the agenda would be ready for a summit. And this agenda is not ready at all.”

    The statement, echoing Moscow’s rhetoric about a leaders’ meeting being impossible unless certain conditions were met, was a setback for Trump, who had spent the week declaring a diplomatic breakthrough in his bid to bring Moscow and Kyiv closer to peace.

    Even as Trump voiced frustration with the slow progress on a potential peace deal, he showed White House reporters a photograph of his meeting with Putin on the red carpet in Alaska, and said Putin wanted to attend the World Cup 2026 football tournament in the US.

    “I’m going to sign this for him. But I was sent one, and I thought you would like to see it, it’s a man named Vladimir Putin, who I believe will be coming, depending on what happens. He may be coming, and he may not, depending on what happens,” Trump said.

    Trump’s comments did not address the fact that Russia was banned from international competitions such as the World Cup after the 2022 invasion of Ukraine and has not taken part in qualification for the 2026 tournament, which will be hosted by the US, Canada and Mexico.

    During a visit to a nuclear research centre on Friday, Putin said there was “light at the end of the tunnel” for a restoration of US-Russia relations.

    “We had a very good, meaningful and frank meeting in Alaska,” Putin said, adding “the next steps now depend on the leadership of the United States, but I am confident that the leadership qualities of the current president.”

    His comments signalled Russia’s optimism that it can mend relations with the US and strike business deals, despite the lack of clear progress towards ending the Ukraine conflict.

    Thousands of Ukrainian civilians have been killed in the full-scale invasion of Ukraine that Russia launched in 2022. Analysts estimate that more than a million soldiers on both sides have been killed or wounded and fighting is continuing unabated, with both sides also attacking energy facilities.

    Russia has maintained its longstanding demand for Ukraine to give up land it still holds in two eastern regions while proposing to freeze the frontline in two more southerly regions Moscow claims fully as its own and possibly hand back small pieces of other Ukrainian territory it controls.

    Zelenskyy meanwhile has dropped his demand for a lengthy ceasefire as a prerequisite for a leaders’ meeting, although he has previously said Ukraine cannot negotiate under the barrel of a gun.

    European leaders meet at the White House to discuss the Ukraine conflict. Photograph: Simon Dawson/No 10 Downing Street

    On Thursday, Zelenskyy had accused Russia of “trying to wriggle out of holding a meeting”, adding that Moscow wanted to continue the offensive.

    The question of eventual security guarantees for Ukraine has been front and centre of the US-led diplomatic push to broker a peace deal to end the conflict.

    Trump – who hosted Zelenskyy and top European leaders at the White House on Monday before making a call to Putin – said Russia had agreed to some western security guarantees for Kyiv.

    But Moscow later cast doubt on any such arrangement, Lavrov saying on Wednesday that discussing them without Russia was “a road to nowhere.”

    “When Russia raises the issue of security guarantees, I honestly do not yet know who is threatening them,” said Zelenskyy, who wants foreign troops in Ukraine to deter Russian attacks in the future.

    With Reuters, Agence France-Presse and the Associated Press

    Continue Reading

  • Shifting geopolitics of South Asia – Opinion

    Shifting geopolitics of South Asia – Opinion

    The recent visit of China’s Foreign Minister to New Delhi marks more than a routine diplomatic exchange. It hints at a subtle but consequential reordering of South Asian geopolitics. China’s engagement with India goes beyond tariffs; it signals a bid to reshape South Asia’s rivalries and regional alignments. After brokering peace in the Middle East, China eyes South Asia—where India and Pakistan remain locked in old disputes.

    As Beijing reaches out to New Delhi, the regional chessboard shifts, raising questions about America’s role and Pakistan’s strategic space. Beijing’s balancing act with India has deep implications for Pakistan’s security, economy, and foreign policy flexibility. The US still provides hard power, but China is emerging as the region’s indispensable broker. Where does this leave Pakistan?

    India and China, despite border disputes and decades of rivalry, appear willing to reopen channels at a time when both face economic and strategic pressures. For India, the outreach is about hedging. Washington has positioned New Delhi as a central pillar of its Indo-Pacific strategy against China. Yet India has never been fully comfortable as a junior partner. Its refusal to sanction Russia, its oil purchases from Moscow, and now its gestures toward Beijing reflect a familiar instinct: preserve strategic autonomy.

    US is not likely to abandon India — the strategic logic is too strong — but it will view this hedging with concern. If India waters down its role in the Indo-Pacific coalition, Washington may respond by tightening expectations or recalibrating its own engagement with South Asia.

    For China, re-engagement with India is about stabilising its periphery and blunting the US containment drive. With tariff conflicts straining trade, Beijing wants to avoid open hostility with South Asia’s largest state, even if relations remain fragile.

    The shift raises many valid questions — which has short term and long-term consequences for South Asian geopolitics, notably:

    1. What this shift means for South Asia?

    2. Can China nudge India and Pakistan toward dialogue amidst developing scenarios?

    3. Will this shift dilute terrorism in Balochistan?

    4. Is China growing influence in the region signal a new world order diluting America’s historic grip on South Asia?

    5. What does the shift means for Pakistan?

    The answer to these questions much depends on the sustainability and sincerity of China-India developing alignment – to be put to test once India and USA trade war reach a settlement and their relations swing back to that of strategic partners – notwithstanding the fact that India’s confidence and reliance on USA has shaken.

    Assuming India takes a midway of balancing the relationship between the two, which is the most likely scenario, the implications of the shift extend beyond India–China ties. Smaller states such as Nepal, Sri Lanka, and Bangladesh are already recipients of Chinese loans and infrastructure. If Beijing can simultaneously keep channels open with both India and Pakistan, it elevates itself as South Asia’s chief mediator—filling a role once associated with Washington.

    For Pakistan, the stakes are particularly high. China’s model of quiet diplomacy has already borne fruit in the Middle East, where Beijing facilitated the Iran–Saudi reconciliation and now the Iran – Pakistan – Afghanistan dialogue. If China applies the same template to South Asia, Pakistan could benefit from reduced hostility with India and expanded trade through a “CPEC Plus” framework.

    Under this scenario, China could nudge India and Pakistan toward dialogue. Both countries are under economic strain, and connectivity across the region is impossible without some easing of tensions. Even modest steps—such as trade resumption—would signal progress. If China’s mediation helps restrain Indian hostility and reopens trade channels, Islamabad gains strategic breathing space to focus on domestic recovery. China’s growing stature as a regional stabilizer also enhances Pakistan’s own relevance as Beijing’s closest partner.

    The obstacles, however, are formidable. Domestic politics in India, dominated by Hindutva nationalism, leaves little space for rapprochement with Pakistan. Kashmir remains a frozen conflict, and electoral cycles often reward confrontation rather than conciliation. Still, China’s rising leverage makes it harder for India to ignore Pakistan’s relevance, particularly where Chinese interests in CPEC and Gwadar are concerned.

    For Islamabad, one immediate concern is Indian interference in Balochistan. Here, China’s role could prove decisive. Since Gwadar and CPEC depend on stability in the province, Beijing has every reason to discourage Indian destabilization efforts. While it cannot compel New Delhi to change course, China’s growing economic influence gives it tools.

    China growing influence in the region is still far from diluting America’s historic grip on South Asia. The struggling economies of South Asian states are in perpetual need of funding from IMF & World Bank and American lucrative markets to sustain their economies – the concessions which China’s model of funding and market does not provide.

    The US still maintains unmatched military power in the Indian Ocean and remains India’s partner in defense and technology. But diplomatically, Beijing has become the region’s problem-solver, filling a vacuum left by Washington’s absence from the region.

    For South Asia, this means living in a dual order: the US as the financial and security anchor and China as the economic and diplomatic broker.

    For Pakistan, the opportunity lies in using China’s rise to ease tensions with India while maintaining diversified external ties.

    Copyright Business Recorder, 2025

    Continue Reading

  • PCJCCI describes CPEC a ‘game-changer’ for Afghanistan – Business & Finance

    PCJCCI describes CPEC a ‘game-changer’ for Afghanistan – Business & Finance

    LAHORE: The China-Pakistan Economic Corridor (CPEC) presents significant opportunities for Afghanistan’s socio-economic development and enhanced regional connectivity, according to senior officials from the Pakistan-China Joint Chamber of Commerce and Industry (PCJCCI).

    Speaking at a think-tank session held at the PCJCCI Secretariat on Wednesday, PCJCCI Acting President Zafar Iqbal described CPEC as a “game-changer” for Afghanistan, positioning the nation as a central hub in the region’s evolving trade and transit ecosystem.

    “Afghanistan is no longer just a landlocked country; with CPEC, it becomes a land-linked trade corridor between Central Asia, South Asia, and the Middle East,” Iqbal stated during the session.

    The integration comes at a crucial time as Uzbekistan, Tajikistan, and other Central Asian Republics plan to utilize Pakistan’s Gwadar Port for their trade operations. This development is expected to generate substantial benefits for Afghanistan through increased transit trade, improved connectivity, and infrastructure investment opportunities.

    The PCJCCI senior vice president highlighted the potential impact on Afghanistan’s agricultural sector, which currently provides livelihoods for more than 60 percent of the population. Through enhanced irrigation systems, improved supply chain logistics, and better market access, agricultural output in Afghanistan could potentially double within five years.

    According to World Bank estimates cited during the session, full integration into CPEC could drive Afghanistan’s GDP growth by up to 6 percent annually. This growth would be fueled by increased trade activities, infrastructure development, and mining investments.

    Afghanistan’s strategic geographical position provides access to over 3 billion consumers in regional markets, making it a critical player in future Eurasian trade routes.

    Several major connectivity projects are under discussion, including the proposed Kabul-Peshawar rail link, which forms part of a broader plan to connect Afghanistan with Gwadar and Karachi ports. The comprehensive infrastructure program envisions over 3,000 kilometers of road and rail connections linking Afghanistan to Pakistan and China through transnational extensions of CPEC.

    Access to Gwadar Port alone could reduce Afghanistan’s export and import costs by 30-40 percent compared to current trade routes through Iran or Pakistan’s northern borders. The port, currently handling over 13 million tons annually, is being expanded to accommodate up to 100 million tons in the future.

    Afghanistan possesses vast untapped natural resources, with estimated mineral reserves valued between $1-3 trillion. These resources include 2.2 billion tons of iron ore, 60 million metric tons of copper, and significant deposits of lithium and rare earth metals—materials essential for the global technology and energy sectors.

    Integration into CPEC offers a secure and investment-ready framework to attract foreign mining companies and develop necessary processing infrastructure, according to PCJCCI officials.

    The inclusion of Afghanistan in CPEC is projected to create over 150,000 direct jobs through the establishment of Special Economic Zones (SEZs). These zones will accommodate manufacturing units, logistics hubs, agro-processing centers, and technology parks, facilitating Afghanistan’s integration into global supply chains.

    Under stable security and investment conditions, Afghanistan could potentially attract $6-8 billion in foreign direct investment over the next decade.

    Energy access represents another critical development area. CPEC energy projects have the potential to supply up to 1,000 MW of electricity to Afghanistan by integrating the country into the regional power grid. Currently, Afghanistan imports over 70 percent of its electricity requirements.

    CPEC-linked energy initiatives, particularly in solar, wind, and hydroelectric power, could help localize energy production and reduce Afghanistan’s dependency on imports.

    Secretary General Salahuddin Hanif emphasised that Special Economic Zones would play a crucial role in empowering Afghan youth through employment opportunities, skills development programs, and entrepreneurship initiatives.

    Copyright Business Recorder, 2025

    Continue Reading