Category: 2. World

  • Xi, Putin, Kim and the optics of a new world order | China

    Xi, Putin, Kim and the optics of a new world order | China

    Waving beatifically over the crowd of 50,000 spectators assembled in Beijing’s Tiananmen Square on Wednesday, Xi Jinping exuded an aura of confidence that many leaders in the west could only envy. To his left stood North Korea’s Kim Jong-un, the supreme leader of an increasingly strident hermit kingdom. To his right was the Russian president, Vladimir Putin, Xi’s “old friend” and China’s biggest ally in opposing the US-led world order. The last time that the leaders of these three countries were together in public was at the height of the cold war.

    “Humanity once again faces the choice between peace or war, dialogue or confrontation,” the Chinese president told the gathered crowds. His insistence that China would “adhere to the path of peaceful development” was punctured somewhat by the country’s biggest ever military parade that marched through the square beneath his rostrum atop the Gate of Heavenly Peace, the entrance to the Forbidden City that has – on and off – been the seat of Chinese power since the 15th century.

    Alongside Xi, Putin and Kim, a gaggle of global autocrats solemnly watched the display of Chinese military might.

    Vladimir Putin, Narendra Modi and Xi Jinping at the Shanghai Cooperation Organisation, which provided a forum for networking at a level normally seen only at the United Nations. Photograph: Suo Takekuma/Reuters

    The same day, more than 5,000 miles away, Volodymyr Zelenskyy and his allies assembled in Paris for a summit on the future of Ukraine, a country that has been racked by war since Russia’s full-scale invasion in 2022. The “coalition of the willing”, led by the UK and France, did not include the US. The optics of the new global order could not be clearer: an anti-western bloc, helmed by China, on one side, and a western alliance of democracies, lacking its traditional leader in Washington, on the other.

    China’s military parade, in which more than 10,000 soldiers marched in unison alongside a sabre-rattling lineup of nuclear-capable missiles and underwater drones, was designed to celebrate 80 years since the end of the second world war. The parade had two aims: to promote the Chinese Communist party’s narrative about its role in defeating the Japanese in 1945, and to display Beijing’s political and military might on the world stage in 2025. Both serve to underline the legitimacy and power of the party, helmed by Xi, at home and abroad.

    Faced with a challenging domestic economy and a bruising trade war with the US, the parade was also a chance for China’s 72-year-old leader to whip up nationalism and provide what some analysts say is a much-needed distraction from China’s problems at home.

    “This kind of event is never about building bridges,” said Yu Jie, a senior research fellow at Chatham House. “It is more about building a political theatre to tell your own version of the story.”

    The ‘coalition of the willing’ gather in Paris for a summit on the future of Ukraine. Photograph: Hollandse Hoogte/Shutterstock

    In Washington DC, there was a growing sense of unease as Xi feted the leaders of some of the world’s most notable pariah states, including Russia, Iran and North Korea – a trio of countries that, along with China, has been described as “the axis of upheaval”. It is a consolidation of alliances that has been accelerated by Donald Trump’s use of political and economic pressure against his friends and foes around the world.

    “It’s being perceived as an inflection point here in Washington, I think also in Europe too,” said Brian Hart, the deputy director of the China Power Project at the Center for Strategic and International Studies in Washington DC. Western governments are “seeing that Xi Jinping is doubling down on his relationships with these countries, despite concern around the world”.

    Trump, who staged his own somewhat lacklustre military parade in Washington in June, quickly responded on social media.

    “May President Xi and the wonderful people of China have a great and lasting day of celebration,” Trump posted on Truth Social. “Please give my warmest regards to Vladimir Putin, and Kim Jong-un, as you conspire against the United States of America.”

    A Kremlin aide denied that any conspiring was taking place in Beijing. “No one has been plotting anything,” Yuri Ushakov said. “None of these three leaders had such a thought.”

    Still, the show of unity among countries broadly sceptical of the US could not have been clearer.

    While the concrete results of the parade and the ensuing meetings between the delegations were limited – and many analysts thought that any real agreements to collude among the US’s rivals would remain hidden – foreign policymakers such as the EU foreign affairs chief Kaja Kallas warned in strident tones that the meeting was “an authoritarian alliance seeking a rapid process towards a new world order”.

    ‘This kind of event is never about building bridges,’ said Yu Jie, a senior research fellow at Chatham House. ‘It is more about building a political theatre to tell your own version of the story.’ Photograph: China News Service/Getty Images

    But the “axis of upheaval” is riven by significant internal fractures, analysts said, and the propaganda effect may have been greater than the real threat to the international rules-based order.

    “People in the west are freaking out, as if there is something that’s really big and meaningful and there is this alternative world order and everything,” said Alexander Gabuev, the director of the Carnegie Russia Eurasia Center. “And I think that the major reason here is really the dysfunction brought into the western family by Donald Trump.”

    A Chinese academic, who asked to remain anonymous, also said that there were cracks in the seemingly robust anti-west alliances, particularly between the two most powerful members: China and Russia.

    China is “pretending to have a strong relationship with Russia to push back against pressure from the US and other western countries,” the academic said.

    “China says there is ‘no limits’ to its relationship with Russia, but in practice, it hesitates, constantly looking over its shoulder, wary of pressure from the west, the EU and Nato.”

    Although China has been criticised for providing economic and political support for Russia’s war in Ukraine, the academic noted that Moscow turned to Pyongyang, not Beijing, for extra boots on the ground. North Korea is thought to have supplied about 15,000 troops to the Russian armed forces – something that Putin thanked Kim for in Beijing.

    Xi, thought to be keen to assert his dominance in the Russia-North Korea relationship, also held talks with Kim this week. The Chinese leader said China and North Korea were “good neighbours, good friends and good comrades”, according to North Korean state media.

    The parade came shortly after the annual Shanghai Cooperation Organisation summit took place in Tianjin, a city that neighbours Beijing. The blandly named conference was another diplomatic coup for Beijing. Dozens of leaders travelled to China for the economic and security conference, which provided a forum for networking at a level normally seen only at the United Nations.

    Most notable among the guests was India’s prime minister, Narendra Modi, whose own relationship with China has been frosty owing to a border dispute and trade spats. Days after being hit with US tariffs of 50% as a punishment for buying Russian oil, Modi was tweeting in Russian about his “excellent” meeting with Putin in Tianjin.

    But this week was not just about diplomacy. It was also about guns.

    Wednesday’s parade was closely watched by military analysts for clues about the Chinese People’s Liberation Army’s modernisation. China’s military uplift has in recent years made it a naval power and put it on track to be capable of a full-scale invasion of Taiwan and the potential war with the US that such an act might spark.

    Several newly developed weapons and aircraft were revealed during China’s military parade, including hypersonic missiles designed to take out ships at sea, underwater drones, and electronic warfare planes that can fly with fighter jets to track moving targets while also drawing away fire. Photograph: China News Service/Getty Images

    Several newly developed weapons and aircraft were revealed, including hypersonic missiles designed to take out ships at sea, underwater drones and electronic warfare planes that can fly with fighter jets to track moving targets for them while also drawing away fire. An unnamed aircraft that was either a real or mocked up stealth drone fighter also turned heads. Meanwhile, the appearance of new submarine-launched and road-mobile intercontinental ballistic missiles confirmed that China now has a solid and diverse delivery system for nuclear strikes – from land, air and sea.

    “Did we know China had a nuclear triad? Yes, we did. But, that image really brings it home,” said Jennifer Parker, an adjunct fellow in naval studies at the University of New South Wales, Canberra.

    “That capability sets China apart from other nuclear states, alongside Russia and the US.”

    Still, analysts noted that none of China’s shiny new weapons have been tested in combat.

    And diplomatically, Beijing still faces challenges. For all its talk of being a stable alternative to Washington, it’s economy is only 60% the size of the US, and its ongoing stability is reliant on agreeing a trade deal with Trump.

    “China is far from being able, or willing, to replace the US as a global public goods provider,” said Alicja Bachulska, a policy fellow at the European Council on Foreign Relations. “Nevertheless, it is willing to exploit the current situation to build its image as a responsible and reliable partner, unlike the US under Donald Trump, and to capitalise on it.”

    Additional research by Lillian Yang

    Dressing to suit the occasion

    It is a sure bet that Xi Jinping’s sartorial choice of suit was as carefully selected as the spotless uniforms of the president’s synchronised soldiers. Composite: EPA, Getty Images

    In a show as tightly choreographed as China’s biggest ever military parade, it is a sure bet that Xi Jinping’s sartorial choice of suit was as carefully selected as the spotless uniforms of the president’s synchronised soldiers.

    Xi presided over the 50,000 spectators in Tiananmen Square in an instantly recognisable “Mao suit”, chosen to signal the leader’s frugality and revolutionary spirit.

    The simple, tunic-style jacket, with four pockets said to represent propriety, justice, honesty and humility, was first adopted by Sun Yat-sen, the nationalist revolutionary who helped to overthrow the Qing dynasty in 1911. Blending Chinese and western elements, the utilitarian jacket symbolised a rejection of imperial decadence. In Chinese, the suit is still known as a “Zhongshan suit”, after the name Sun is known by in China.

    But to the outside world the outfit is better known as the Mao suit. Chairman Mao Zedong wore one to declare the foundation of the People’s Republic of China in 1949.

    Posters of Mao Zedong in Beijing, who wore a Mao suit to declare the foundation of the People’s Republic of China in 1949. Photograph: Jade Gao/AFP/Getty Images

    Since then, the suit has gone out of fashion among the masses, but it is still the outfit of choice for Xi when he wants to project authority as the vanguard of China’s Communist revolution.

    The suit is “saturated [in] political meaning,” said Sari Arho Havrén, an associate fellow at the Royal United Services Institute. “It commemorates the revolutionary past of the Communist party” and “shows the separation from the west”.

    For day to day diplomacy, Xi tends to favour a western-style suit and tie. But for major events, such as when he attended a state banquet at Buckingham Palace in 2015, he dons the Mao suit.

    Amy Hawkins

    Continue Reading

  • Xi Jinping asks the world to choose ‘war or peace.’ Which direction is China headed?

    Xi Jinping asks the world to choose ‘war or peace.’ Which direction is China headed?


    Beijing
     — 

    The optics could not have been more stark as Chinese leader Xi Jinping arrived at a massive military parade in Beijing flanked by Russian President Vladimir Putin and North Korean leader Kim Jong Un – with some two dozen other leaders including from Iran, Pakistan, Belarus and Myanmar trailing behind.

    Jumbotrons at Tiananmen Square beamed the image to the 50,000 people gathered under the beating Beijing sun to witness the spectacle, many waving small Chinese flags, while state media transmitted it to televisions across China and the world.

    Many watching in capitals across the West, including Donald Trump, thought the messaging was clear: China is deliberately provoking the US and its partners.

    “Please give my warmest regards to Vladimir Putin, and Kim Jong Un, as you conspire against The United States of America,” the US president wrote to Xi on social media as legions of troops goose-stepped their way through central Beijing.

    For anyone who heard the echoing shouts of the thousands of well-drilled troops and saw the hulking nuclear-capable missiles, underwater drones and warplanes gliding down Beijing’s Avenue of Eternal Peace, there’s no question that Xi was orchestrating his most forceful showing yet of China as an alternative global leader – with both military might and geopolitical heft.

    China has long touted its “peaceful” rise and decried the “warmongering” US. But the parade, commemorating the end of World War II, was undoubtedly intended to telegraph the rapid advancement of the world’s largest military, and signal Xi’s growing ability to project hard power on the world stage.

    A live mic that picked up Xi and Putin discussing how people may soon live to 150 through medical advances hinted at the durability both see for their own positions driving a global transition of power, as perhaps did Kim’s decision to bring his daughter and potential successor with him on his green train to Beijing.

    Behind the carefully choreographed pomp was a key message – that Xi aims for a world where the US and the West don’t get to set the rules – and a question: what does that mean for the US and the world?

    For Xi, setting Kim and Putin by his side was a forceful way to underscore his belief that the existing international system led by the US is to blame for current conflict and confrontation, not the men seated around him.

    “Only when all countries and nations treat each other as equals, coexist in peace and support each other” can they “uphold common security” and “eradicate the root cause of war,” Xi said during a speech carried by loudspeaker across the parade grounds on Wednesday.

    That root cause is “Cold War mentality, bloc confrontation and bullying practices,” Xi and his officials have said time and again, using Beijing’s code to describe American foreign policy.

    China's President Xi Jinping (center), North Korea's leader Kim Jong Un (right) and Russia's President Vladimir Putin arrive for a reception following a military parade on September 3.

    Earlier in the week, in the port city of Tianjin, the Chinese leader closed a summit of regional leaders including Indian Prime Minister Narendra Modi by unveiling a “global governance initiative” – one pillar of Xi’s broader plan to reshape the way the international system is run and make it more “democratic.”

    The plan, which supports the United Nations, could have broad reach, according to Wang Yiwei, director of the Institute of International Affairs at Renmin University in Beijing. “Global governance is not just focused on (security) but also finance – SWIFT system, sanctions, trade, AI governance, ocean governance, climate change … and we need to make the Global South have more say and power (at the UN),” Wang said.

    Observers say Xi’s initiative is meant to both stand as a rallying point for countries that feel squeezed by an international system they see as unfairly dominated by the West – and help China dilute US power across a range of areas, by sharing it across more China-friendly countries.

    That could help Beijing shape an international system where national development trumps any concept of individual human rights and no US-led alliance can hem in China’s ambitions. It’s an arrangement that could well benefit China’s designs on the island democracy of Taiwan, which Beijing claims and has not ruled out taking by force.

    The one-two punch of Xi’s summitry followed by his parade over the past week appeared carefully calibrated to send a message: while China builds out its influence and soft power, it’s also growing the hard power that could back it if needed.

    And even as China emphasizes that its military is for defensive purposes, its show of strength on Wednesday has given analysts around the world a clear look at the extent of its offensive capabilities and its vast capacity to produce arms.

    Members of the Chinese military hold flags during a military parade in Beijing's Tiananmen Square on September 3.

    The arsenal of missiles on show could enable China to strike targets across the world and evade advanced missile defenses with hypersonic technology; its vanguard of combat drones as well as laser weapons could also make it challenging for adversaries to block the advances of Chinese forces in the region in the event of an offensive.

    And it was against a backdrop of this bristling display that Xi looked out into the crowds before him in Tiananmen Square and called on humanity to make a simple choice: “peace or war.”

    There, Xi appeared to be referring to a choice of international system: China’s or the West’s.

    And it’s a choice that he may now be more confident to ask countries to make, as Beijing watches Trump shake up America’s traditional role on the global stage by exiting international bodies, axing foreign aid, and roiling longstanding allies and partners with tariffs and other demands.

    But it’s a statement that rings eerily for many observers when delivered alongside a show of military might attended by Putin, whose invasion of Ukraine sparked Europe’s bloodiest war since WWII, and Kim, who feeds him weapons and troops while building up his own illegal nuclear stockpile.

    Chinese officials have long said China’s military is defensive, and took pains to describe their parade as commemorating China’s contributions to “safeguarding world peace.” Xi assured his spectators that China “remained committed to the path of peaceful development.”

    But as Beijing hardens its ties with Russia, North Korea and other nations unfriendly to the West, the emergence of two camps and the contest between them appears clearer than ever.

    Indonesian President Prabowo Subianto, Russian President Vladimir Putin, Chinese President Xi Jinping and North Korean leader Kim Jong Un look out from Tiananmen Gate as they attend a military parade in Beijing on September 3.

    Dismissing those ties between these countries would be “naive and dangerous,” said Edward Howell, a lecturer in politics at the University of Oxford in the United Kingdom, who focuses on the Korean Peninsula.

    Their “common opposition to the US” allows for future, greater possibilities for “exchange in trade, weapons, and knowhow… for the broader goal of undermining the US-led international order,” he added.

    And even as Beijing hopes to see a world where US alliances are broken apart, its own aggression in the region – as it asserts its territorial claims in the South China Sea and toward Taiwan – is driving American allies in Asia closer to Washington.

    Meanwhile, as China faces its own challenges at home, where the ruling Communist Party is grappling with a slowing economy and persistent unemployment, some observers wonder whether drumming up nationalism as a distraction strategy could push China into an even more aggressive stance.

    The parade on Wednesday “serves not only to demonstrate power abroad but also to rally nationalism at home and strengthen public support in face of economic headwinds,” said Tong Zhao, a senior fellow at the Carnegie Endowment of International Peace in the US. That helps Beijing in “shoring up internal stability to bolster China’s long-term rivalry with Washington,” he added.

    And within the country, there are also those considering carefully where China’s military ambitions will lead.

    Senior Col. (ret) Zhou Bo, a senior fellow at Tsinghua University’s Center for International Security and Strategy in Beijing, told CNN that he looked forward to China between now and 2049 becoming a so-called world-class military and still maintaining peace and continuing to rise.

    “At that time, China’s aim is to be neck-to-neck with the US military. Then, of course, you have another dilemma: how can you prove that you have a world-class military without being combat tested?”


    Continue Reading

  • Israeli arms manufacturer closes UK facility targeted by Palestine Action | Arms trade

    Israeli arms manufacturer closes UK facility targeted by Palestine Action | Arms trade

    An Israeli arms manufacturer’s facility in Bristol which was repeatedly targeted by Palestine Action appears to have closed unexpectedly.

    The Elbit Systems UK site in the Aztec West business park was the subject of dozens of protests by Palestine Action, including on 1 July, days before the direct action group was banned under the Terrorism Act.

    Elbit has held the lease since 2019 and it was not due to expire until 2029. The protests included blockades using lock-ons, occupying the roof, smashing windows and dousing the site in red paint.

    Elbit Systems UK is a subsidiary of Elbit Systems, which is Israel’s largest arms producer. Elbit Systems, which had revenues of $6.8bn (£5bn) last year, describes itself as the “backbone” of the Israel Defense Force’s (IDF’s) drone fleet, which has been used extensively in the assault on Gaza.

    Its portfolio also includes systems for military aircraft and helicopters, armed remote control boats, land vehicles and for command and control.

    Elbit Systems UK did not respond to the Guardian’s request for comment about the status of the site. But the property, located within a commercial and industrial park on the outskirts of Bristol where the M5 and M4 meet, was deserted when the Guardian visited this week.

    There were no staff present aside from a security guard stationed in a vehicle parked outside the premises.

    The site was previously owned by Somerset Council, which was also targeted by Palestine Action before selling the property last year. The Guardian attempted to contact the current landlords. Fences and barriers had been put up around the site after it was targeted by protesters.

    The Aztec West facility is a different Elbit facility to that in Filton, Bristol, which was also targeted by Palestine Action and in relation to which 24 people are awaiting trial on charges including criminal damage, violent disorder and aggravated burglary. One individual has also been charged with grievous bodily harm with intent.

    Before it was proscribed, Palestine Action ran a campaign targeting the company’s UK sites and connected firms, which escalated significantly after Israel’s assault on Gaza in response to the 7 October 2023 attacks by Hamas. Elbit System UK’s latest accounts show that it made an operating loss of £4.7m last year, compared with a profit of £3.8m in 2023.

    skip past newsletter promotion

    Andrew Feinstein, an expert and author on the global arms trade and former member of the South African national assembly, described the closure as “extremely significant”, adding: “We need to remind ourselves that Elbit (Systems) is one of the two most important Israeli arms films, along with IAI, that is it is obviously a key component of Israel’s military industrial complex.”

    Last year, Elbit Sytems UK sold its West Midlands-based subsidiary Elite KL (now Calatherm). After Elite KL’s operating profit fell by 75% in 2022, it said that it was primarily a result of increased security costs, its Tamworth site having been targeted by Palestine Action. The new owners said they would not have any association with Elbit and cancel its defence contracts.

    In 2022, Eblit sold Ferranti P&C, part of its Oldham-based business, after 18 months of protests by Palestine Action as well as Oldham Peace.

    Last month, Private Eye revealed that Elbit Systems UK was part of a consortium close to winning a £2bn contract that would make it a “strategic partner” of the Ministry of Defence. The FT reported that the former Labour cabinet minister, Peter Hain had written to the defence secretary, Jon Healey, urging him not to hand the contract to the company, given “the devastation unfolding in Gaza”.

    Palestine Action has been granted permission for a judicial review in November of the decision to proscribe. However, at a court of appeal hearing on 25 September, the home secretary will try to overtturn the permission decision.

    Continue Reading

  • ‘Everything is gone’: Punjabi farmers suffer worst floods in three decades | India

    ‘Everything is gone’: Punjabi farmers suffer worst floods in three decades | India

    For days, farmers in the Indian state of Punjab watched the pounding monsoon rains fall and the rivers rise with mounting apprehension. By Wednesday, many woke to find their fears realised as the worst floods in more than three decades ravaged their farms and decimated their livelihoods.

    Hundreds of thousands of acres of bright green rice paddies – due to be harvested imminently – as well as crops of cotton and sugar cane were left destroyed as they became fully submerged in more than five feet of muddy brown flood waters. The bodies of drowned cattle littered the ground.

    “The crops are ruined, and even our homes are in danger of collapsing,” said Parmpreet Singh, 52, a farmer from Ajnala in Amritsar district, Punjab. His family, including his elderly mother and two young children, were now living on the roof of their house to stay safe from the murky flood waters.

    “My entire livelihood depends on my seven hectares of farmland, all of which has been destroyed by flood waters,” he said, despairing that his only option left would be to sell his land and abandon farming. “I had already invested most of my money into seeds and fertilisers for the previous crop. Now everything is gone.”

    While monsoon season usually brings heavy rain, the extreme levels of rainfall that fell across northern India this week caused untold damage in Punjab, resulting in flash floods and swollen rivers breaching their banks and overflowing into fields and villages. So far, 43 people have lost their lives and almost 2,000 villages in the state have been affected, leaving hundreds of thousands of people without electricity and access to clean water. The stench of rotting animal carcasses hangs over many villages.

    Rescue workers evacuate people affected by rising flood waters in Multan district, Punjab province, Pakistan. Photograph: Mansoor Abbas/EPA

    “This is the worst time Punjab has ever faced,” said Parminder Singh Pinki, a lawmaker from Firozpur district in western Punjab, one of the areas badly hit by floods.

    “I have never witnessed such devastation in my lifetime. Entire farmlands are submerged under water, now layered with mud and sand.”

    India’s farmers have already faced mounting hardship, with millions saddled with high debts, low incomes and heavy crop losses in the face of increasingly extreme and unpredictable weather conditions brought on by the climate crisis.

    Pinki was among those who accused the ruling Bharatiya Janata party (BJP) government, led by Narendra Modi, of negligence towards farmers and simply abandoning them to their fate during this year’s extreme monsoon.

    “The government had been aware for months about the weather forecasts and should have put proper measures and emergency responses in place,” he said. “But that never happened, and this failure has led to destruction on such a massive scale.”

    He was echoed by Surinder Singh, 75, a farmer from Sarala Kalan village in Patiala. For days, he had watched the canal near to their village getting higher and higher, but had been powerless to stop it.

    “The government will make promises of relief, but the farmers will end up receiving nothing,” he said. “In the end, we are left to take care of ourselves.” Like many, he questioned the long-term viability of Indian agriculture, which employs half the country’s workforce and keeps food on the country’s tables.

    “I cannot imagine what is left for our future generations,” he said. “Floods and extreme weather events are becoming more frequent, and the future does not look any better. If the farmers of Punjab – the food bowl of India – cannot even feed themselves, how will they feed others?”

    Governments in India and Pakistan have been criticised for their inadequate response as villages across the region are submerged. Photograph: Mansoor Abbas/EPA

    This crisis has not been India’s alone. Across the border, in Pakistan’s agriculture-heavy province also called Punjab, the devastation caused by floods has been even more catastrophic, with almost 2 million people evacuated and about 4,000 villages submerged in flood waters.

    skip past newsletter promotion

    The two countries share several major rivers and the Indian government’s decision to release water from several heavily filled dams upstream has led to further flooding on both sides of the border in the geographical region of Punjab, prompting Pakistani officials to try to blame India for the disaster.

    Such was the fury of the overflowing Ravi River, which runs through the border of India into Pakistan, that on Friday it ripped down 30km of iron fencing that forms the highly militarised border between the two conflicting neighbours, and forced India’s border security force soldiers to abandon dozens of their highly sensitive posts.

    Maratab Ali Gondal, a farmer from Mandi Bahauddin district in Pakistani Punjab, said the rising levels of the Chenab River, which also flows from India, had washed away 90 acres of his crops, including rice and sugar cane, causing losses of millions of rupees.

    Gondal said he had spent the previous months begging local officials to build embankments along the river, which would protect farmland, but nothing had been done. “The water erosion has taken all of my land. There is flood water everywhere now. This is not the fault of India; it was [Pakistani] Punjab government negligence which swept away my farmland,” he said.

    He added: “This is not only my story – our farmers have been witnessing the worst time in the country’s history.”

    Pakistan’s Punjab province hit by ‘biggest flood in its history’ – video

    It was not only farmland that was affected. Residents of the highly affluent housing development Park View Society in Lahore, recently constructed just a few hundred metres away from the bank of the Ravi, also found their multimillion-rupee homes filled with murky flood water. Experts said that rapid deforestation and development along the waterways was only worsening the likelihood of floods in the area.

    Umar, a resident who moved to the development this year, said his home had been filled with five feet of river water. “Many of us have invested our life savings in buying or constructing a dream house here,” he said. “But how could they be allowed to build it if it is at such risk of flooding?”

    Maryam Nawaz Sharif, the chief minister of Pakistani Punjab, who is also the niece of Pakistan’s prime minister, Shehbaz Sharif, was accused of doing little to help those affected by the flooding. In a social media post, she highlighted how portable toilets were being installed at a relief camp to help the displaced – however, the image she shared was revealed to be from two years ago.

    Continue Reading

  • President Putin rejects western plan for Ukraine security force – samaa tv

    1. President Putin rejects western plan for Ukraine security force  samaa tv
    2. Analysis: Putin doubles down on Ukraine war stance after Beijing meeting  BBC
    3. Western troops in Ukraine would be ‘targets’ for Russian forces: Putin  Al Jazeera
    4. Western troops in Ukraine would be ‘legitimate targets’, Putin says  The Guardian
    5. Putin says foreign troops in Ukraine would be legitimate targets  Reuters

    Continue Reading

  • Rift over Palestinian statehood deepens tension between U.S., France – The Washington Post

    1. Rift over Palestinian statehood deepens tension between U.S., France  The Washington Post
    2. Recognition of Palestinian state is ‘disastrous’, US ambassador says  BBC
    3. Israel warns recognising Palestinian state could trigger ‘unilateral’ action  Dawn
    4. ‘Closure of Consulate’: Israel threatens France over Palestine move  news.cgtn.com
    5. High Court rules state failing to adequately feed Palestinian security prisoners  The Times of Israel

    Continue Reading

  • Power Shifts

    Power Shifts

    China’s President Xi Jinping has just concluded another display of diplomatic authority, reinforcing Beijing’s place at the centre of global politics. The optics were clear: China is no longer emerging; it is firmly in command of its own orbit. On the other side of the globe, Donald Trump, never one to miss an opportunity for theatrics, responded with his trademark outburst, declaring that India and Russia had “lost” themselves to “the deepest, darkest China”. The juxtaposition is almost too telling.

    What we are witnessing is not merely the showmanship of individual leaders but a larger signalling of shifting power balances. China is playing the long game; methodical, calculated, and patient. The United States, meanwhile, appears content to rely on bluster, with Trump’s rant serving as a convenient illustration of how its political discourse often collapses into petulance. One might even say his tirade, amplified on social media, sounded less like statesmanship and more like a child stamping his feet at being left out of the game. The danger in such rhetoric, however, lies beyond its immaturity. Othering world leaders, dismissing nations as pawns in some imagined conspiracy against the US, and casually stoking narratives of conflict serve no one, except, of course, the elite who profit handsomely from perpetual war. It is warmongering disguised as patriotism, and it is far from harmless.

    Moreover, Washington is hardly in a position to lecture others. From decades of political interference in sovereign states to its ongoing, unflinching support for Israel’s campaign of genocide in Palestine, the US’s moral authority is not just eroded, it is threadbare. Perhaps a moment of introspection is overdue. Fix the domestic chaos, address the hypocrisies, and only then look outward. Until then, the world is unlikely to take American indignation seriously anymore, least of all when it comes dressed as a tantrum.


    Continue Reading

  • Trump signs order offering some tariff exemptions to countries with U.S. trade deals

    Trump signs order offering some tariff exemptions to countries with U.S. trade deals

    U.S. President Donald Trump signed an executive order offering some tariff exemptions as soon as Monday to trading partners who strike deals on industrial exports such as nickel, gold and other metals, as well as pharmaceutical compounds and chemicals.

    Trump has spent his first seven months in office building up massive tariff increases to reorder the global trading system, cut U.S. trade deficits and extract concessions from trading partner countries in negotiations.

    His latest order identifies more than 45 categories for zero import tariffs from “aligned partners” who clinch framework pacts to cut Trump’s “reciprocal” tariffs and duties imposed under the Section 232 national security statute.

    Continue Reading

  • US Navy SEALs killed North Korean civilians during botched mission: Report | Kim Jong Un News

    US Navy SEALs killed North Korean civilians during botched mission: Report | Kim Jong Un News

    US Navy SEALs killed several North Korean fishermen after encountering them by accident during a botched mission, US news outlet reports.

    United States Navy SEALs shot and killed several North Korean civilians during a botched mission in 2019 to plant a listening device in the nuclear-armed country, reportedly approved by US President Donald Trump, a leading US news outlet reports.

    The New York Times reported on Friday that the classified mission was carried out by the US Navy’s SEAL Team 6 during high-stakes diplomatic negotiations between Washington and Pyongyang in early 2019.

    Recommended Stories

    list of 3 itemsend of list

    The elite special forces unit – the same one that killed former al-Qaeda leader Osama bin Laden in 2011 – was tasked with covertly going ashore in North Korea and planting a listening device to spy on the country’s leadership.

    But working in the dead of night with blackout communications, a series of errors led to civilians – several North Koreans reportedly diving for shellfish – inadvertently coming across the US special forces as they splashed ashore.

    The SEALs opened fire, killing all those on board a small fishing vessel, the Times report said, without specifying the number of casualties.

    Officials familiar with the mission told the Times that the US soldiers “pulled the bodies into the water to hide them from the North Korean authorities”. One source described how SEAL members “punctured the boat crew’s lungs with knives to make sure their bodies would sink”.

    The Times said it gained knowledge of the botched mission through interviews with dozens of people, “including civilian government officials, members of the first Trump administration and current and former military personnel with knowledge of the mission”.

    All spoke on condition of anonymity due to the mission’s classified status, the news outlet said. It added that several people said their decision to provide details was out of concern that the US military’s special operations failures are “often hidden by government secrecy”.

    Sources said President Trump, during his first term in office, gave the mission its final go-ahead.

    Trump denied any knowledge of the operations when questioned by reporters about the report on Friday.

    “I could look, but I know nothing about [it],” Trump said.

    “I’m hearing it now for the first time,” he said.

    US officials said it was “unclear” whether Pyongyang ever pieced together what had happened in 2019.

    North Korea did not make any public statements about the deaths of civilians at the time and has yet to comment on the story published by the Times.

    Continue Reading

  • EU not ‘living up to responsibilities’ on Gaza war: Belgian FM

    EU not ‘living up to responsibilities’ on Gaza war: Belgian FM

    BRUSSELS (Belgium) (AFP) – Belgian Foreign Minister Maxime Prevot told AFP Friday that the EU’s credibility on foreign policy was “collapsing” due to the bloc’s failure to act over Israel’s war in Gaza.

    “It is undeniable, we are not going to bury our heads in the sand, that the European Union at this stage is not living up to its responsibilities in this enormous humanitarian crisis,” Prevot said in an interview at his office in Brussels.

    Belgium has said it will recognise the State of Palestine at this month’s UN General Assembly, while unilaterally imposing new sanctions against Israel, in view of the humanitarian crisis in Gaza.

    That move comes as the EU has so far failed to take action against Israel in the face of the dire situation in Gaza, because of deep divisions among its 27 member states.

    “It is clear that, in the eyes of the public, the credibility of the European Union’s foreign policy on this particular issue is collapsing,” Prevot said.

    The EU’s executive in July proposed cutting funding to Israeli start-ups over the war, but so far the move has not got the backing of a majority of countries.

    Prevot said Belgium’s decision on recognising the State of Palestine and sanctioning some Israeli ministers was meant to send a “strong political and diplomatic signal” to the government of Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu.

    The recognition will take legal effect via royal decree, subject to two conditions: the release of all remaining hostages held by Hamas, and the militant group’s full exclusion from Palestinian governance.

    Prevot said the aim was to “put pressure on the Israeli government to respond as quickly as possible to the humanitarian emergency” in Gaza.

    “There is a moral obligation, and there is also a legal imperative to act; countries are parties to international conventions and treaties that oblige them to take all necessary measures to prevent genocide from occurring,” said Belgium’s top diplomat.

    “We must be proactive defenders of international law.”

    In July, French President Emmanuel Macron said France would recognise a Palestinian state at the UN meeting, due to be held from September 9 to 23 in New York.

    More than a dozen other Western countries have since called on others to do the same.

     


    Related Topics



    Subscribe Dunya News on YouTube

    ‘ ; r_text[1] = ” ; r_text[2] = ” ; r_text[3] = ” ; r_text[4] = ” ; r_text[5] = ” ; r_text[6] = ” ; var i = Math.floor(r_text.length * Math.random()); document.write(r_text[i]);

    Continue Reading