Category: 2. World

  • Netanyahu acknowledges India’s use of ‘battle-tested’ Israeli weapons against Pakistan — Indian media

    Netanyahu acknowledges India’s use of ‘battle-tested’ Israeli weapons against Pakistan — Indian media

    Pakistan says will finalize Roosevelt Hotel’s privatization this year as it seeks financial adviser


    ISLAMABAD: Pakistan’s government has initiated the process to hire a new financial adviser for the partial sale of its New York-based Roosevelt Hotel, Adviser to the Finance Minister Khurram Schehzad confirmed this week, clarifying that the transaction would be completed this year.


    Pakistan plans to sell a minority stake in the century-old Manhattan hotel and is seeking a redevelopment partner as part of a broader effort to offload loss-making state-owned assets under a $7 billion agreement with the International Monetary Fund (IMF). The Roosevelt Hotel, viewed as one of Pakistan’s most valuable foreign holdings, was closed in 2020 and has since operated intermittently, including as a migrant shelter.


    Global real estate firm Jones Lang LaSalle (JLL) last month resigned from its role as financial adviser for the hotel’s privatization, citing a conflict of interest due to client interest in the property.


    A report in English-language newspaper ‘The News’ on Thursday claimed that if the Privatization Commission accelerates the process of hiring JLL’s replacement, it would require 18 months to do so. The delay will burden the national exchequer with at least $50 million in the form of debt servicing and maintenance, the report claimed.


    “The advertisement for the new financial adviser has already been published and the selection process is underway,” Schehzad told Arab News on Thursday, responding to the report.


    Pakistan has said it would not carry out an outright sale of the hotel but has decided to adopt a joint venture model to maximize long-term value.


    Schehzad said JLL completed the entire transaction structure for the joint venture, which was approved by the Privatization Commission and the federal cabinet.


    He said the new adviser would proceed with the same structure and would only be responsible for finding a development partner for the venture.


    “Therefore, there will not be a delay of one-and-a-half years as reported,” the finance official clarified. “Instead, the transaction will be completed within this year as planned.”


    Schehzad said JLL resigned from the process as the firm was interested in becoming a partner on the buyer’s side, which would have created a conflict of interest.


    “They even committed to returning all the money they had received in their role as the financial adviser,” he said, adding that there were many parties interested in investing in the hotel.


    The report had also said that a financial body had sent an official communication to the finance ministry, inquiring about the fate of its loan of $142 million to the Roosevelt Hotel after JLL resigned.


    The report said the finance ministry did not respond to the institution, warning that debt servicing would continue to burden the national exchequer. It said the financial body had lent the money to the Roosevelt Hotel in 2020.


    Schehzad confirmed the loan had been issued by the National Bank of Pakistan, saying its communication with the finance ministry was “a routine matter.”


    “This issue will also be addressed when the partnership agreement is signed,” he said.


    ‘BETTER PLANNING, BETTER ENGAGEMENTS’


    Pakistani economists viewed JLL’s resignation as a setback but said it would not derail the privatization process.


    Dr. Sajid Amin, deputy executive director at Islamabad-based think tank Sustainable Development Policy Institute (SDPI), said it was unfortunate authorities were unable to privatize the property despite its prime location.


    “We need better planning and better engagements so that we can privatize a prestigious property,” Amin told Arab News.


    Amin believed the advisory firm’s withdrawal would not have a significant impact on the IMF reforms agenda that Pakistan had agreed to, since JLL had stepped down over a potential conflict of interest.


    “The government will start looking for a new financial adviser firm and it will be sufficient to prove that the IMF commitments are on track,” he added.


    Dr. Ali Salman, executive director of the Policy Research Institute of Market Economy (PRIME), an Islamabad-based independent economic policy think tank, said privatization has many models, and a joint venture — instead of a direct sale — was an impressive approach.


    He said that the cost of the delay could be recovered through a joint venture deal if it was carried out professionally and transparently, according to the approved structure.


    “We need to increase the capacity of the Privatization Commission to ensure timely and well-informed decisions,” Salman added.

    Continue Reading

  • Netanyahu’s plan for Gaza risks dragging Israel into a conflict with no clear endpoint | World News

    Netanyahu’s plan for Gaza risks dragging Israel into a conflict with no clear endpoint | World News

    Israeli Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu’s new direction in the war on Gaza risks dragging Israel into a conflict with no clear endpoint.

    The stated goal remains, at least outwardly, the total destruction of Hamas.

    But attempting to eliminate an idea, particularly one tied to resistance and Palestinian national identity, is likely an impossible task.

    The prime minister’s plan has now received approval from the security cabinet.

    Follow the latest updates on the war in Gaza

    Yet in many ways, this remains one man’s war.

    Public opposition is growing. Protests have become a near-daily occurrence. Hostage families and their supporters continue to take to the streets, fearing the current strategy puts their loved ones in even greater danger.

    The military also appears increasingly uneasy.

    The chief of staff of the Israel Defence Forces (IDF), Lieutenant General Eyal Zamir, has raised strong objections.

    He is warning of military fatigue, the risks of a prolonged occupation, and the danger of turning the Israeli army into a long-term policing force for millions of Palestinians.

    Many within the military, like a significant portion of the Israeli public, would prefer a ceasefire that could lead to the release of more hostages.

    Israel currently claims to control around 75 percent of the Gaza Strip.

    Under the new plan, it will attempt to move into the remaining areas.

    Under international law, Gaza is already considered under Israeli occupation.

    According to the United Nations Office for the Coordination of Humanitarian Affairs, 86.3% of the Strip falls within Israeli militarised zones.

    The most intense operations for the new plan will likely focus on Gaza City, considered the de facto capital of the Strip and the administrative stronghold of Hamas.

    Taking Gaza City is seen as a key step in weakening Hamas’s operational capabilities.

    Its capture would also carry deep symbolic weight, potentially altering the political landscape of post-war Gaza.

    Israel believes a large number of hostages are still being held in or near Gaza City.

    This is one of the main reasons the IDF has previously avoided full incursions into those areas.

    Follow The World

    Listen to The World with Richard Engel and Yalda Hakim every Wednesday

    Tap to follow

    The risk to those in captivity remains high.

    Nevertheless, none of these plans will unfold quickly.

    The campaign could take months to prepare and many more to execute.

    In the meantime, Israel risks accusations of committing to an open-ended war with no clear exit strategy.

    Implementing control over Gaza would require a long-term project.

    Observers suggest it could mirror the military and administrative template used in the occupied West Bank (which has persisted for decades). Such an effort in Gaza would likely take years to set up.

    The Prime Minister’s Office has laid out five conditions that must be met before Israel agrees to end the war.

    These are: the full disarmament of Hamas, the return of all fifty remaining hostages (twenty of whom are believed to be alive), the complete demilitarisation of Gaza, Israeli security control over the territory, and the replacement of both Hamas and the Palestinian Authority with a new civilian government.

    These demands, while politically significant, will likely deepen Israel’s international isolation as the already horrendous civilian death toll in Gaza continues to climb.

    Critics argue that the operation is increasingly tied to Netanyahu’s own political survival.

    Since the Hamas-led attack on October 7, 2023, his popularity has collapsed.

    Polls consistently show a deep loss of public trust, and many Israelis blame him for the intelligence and leadership failures that led to the worst terror attack in the country’s history.

    Read more:
    Israel’s security cabinet agrees full military takeover of Gaza
    GHF aid sites in Gaza are scenes of ‘orchestrated killing’, charity claims

    Mass protests, led especially by families of the hostages, have called for new elections and a change in leadership.

    Netanyahu, however, may view the continuation of war as a means to delay accountability and avoid political defeat.

    His coalition depends on the support of far-right ministers such as Itamar Ben Gvir and Bezalel Smotrich.

    Any sign of compromise or willingness to negotiate risks collapsing his fragile government.

    It is also worth considering just how long this war has already dragged on.

    After 22 months of devastating conflict, many in Israel believe that Hamas no longer poses a strategic threat.

    Yet the war’s goals have become increasingly ambiguous, and its endpoint remains undefined.

    Hamas has largely fully transitioned into a guerrilla force.

    Israel now faces the same dilemma that has haunted major powers before it, fighting an asymmetric enemy deeply embedded in civilian areas.

    As the United States discovered in Vietnam and the Soviet Union in Afghanistan, fighting such a war comes at a price that is hard to grasp until it is far too late.

    Continue Reading

  • France is still fighting its biggest wildfire in 75 years

    France is still fighting its biggest wildfire in 75 years



    France is still fighting its biggest wildfire in 75 years

    A major wildfire started on Tuesday, August 5, near the village of Ribaute in southern France and has already burned an area bigger than Paris.

    So far one woman has died and 13 people are injured, including 11 firefighters. Two of them are in serious condition.

    Over 2,000 firefighters and 500 vehicles are still working in the Aude region. The army and police are also helping. Water dropping planes and helicopters have made more than 130 drops to control the flames.

    Officials say the fire is now under control but not fully out. It may take many more days to finish the job. “The fire is continuing, but the danger is not over,” said a top local officer.

    The wildfire has burned over 17,000 hectares of land. Villages like Jonquieres and Corbieres are badly affected. About 80 percent of Jonquieres is destroyed, and smoke can be seen from space.

    People cannot go back to their homes yet. Seventeen shelters have been set up for them. The road remains closed due to fallen power lines and other risks. Forests in the area are off limits until Sunday.

    Prime Minister Francois Bayrou called it a “huge disaster” and blamed climate change. Hot weather, strong winds, and dry plants helped the fire spread fast. The environment minister also said global warning made the fire worse.

    President Emmanuel Macron has promised full support and told the public to stay alert.

    Continue Reading

  • WHO says nearly 100,000 struck with cholera in Sudan

    WHO says nearly 100,000 struck with cholera in Sudan

    The World Health Organization on Thursday said nearly 100,000 cholera cases had been reported in Sudan since July last year, as it warned of more hunger, displacement and disease to come.

    Since April 2023, Sudan has been torn apart by a power struggle between army chief Abdel Fattah al-Burhan and Mohamed Hamdan Daglo, commander of the rival paramilitary Rapid Support Forces. The fighting has killed tens of thousands.

    “In Sudan, unrelenting violence has led to widespread hunger, disease and suffering,” said WHO chief Tedros Adhanom Ghebreyesus.

    “Cholera has swept across Sudan, with all states reporting outbreaks. Nearly 100,000 cases have been reported since July last year.”

    Oral cholera vaccination campaigns had been conducted in several states, including the capital Khartoum, he told a press conference with the Geneva UN correspondents’ association ACANU.

    “While we are seeing a declining trend in numbers, there are gaps in disease surveillance, and progress is fragile,” he said.

    “Recent floods, affecting large parts of the country, are expected to worsen hunger and fuel more outbreaks of cholera, malaria, dengue and other diseases.”

    Cholera is an acute intestinal infection that spreads through food and water contaminated with bacteria, often from faeces.

    It causes severe diarrhoea, vomiting and muscle cramps.

    Cholera can kill within hours when not attended to, though it can be treated with simple oral rehydration, and antibiotics for more severe cases.

    There has been a global increase in cholera cases, and their geographical spread, since 2021.

    – Malnutrition –
    As for hunger, Tedros said there were reports from El-Fasher, the besieged capital of North Darfur state, that people were eating animal feed to survive.

    Across the country, millions are going hungry and around 770,000 children under five years old are expected to suffer from severe acute malnutrition this year.

    “In the first six months of this year, nutrition centres supported by WHO have treated more than 17,000 severely malnourished children with medical complications. But many more are beyond reach,” Tedros warned.

    The UN health agency’s efforts were being held back by limited access and a lack of funding, he added, with the WHO having received less than a third of the money it has appealed for to provide urgent health assistance in Sudan.

    The WHO director-general said that as long as the violence continues in Sudan, “we can expect to see more hunger, more displacement and more disease”.


    Continue Reading

  • Israel’s security cabinet approves Gaza City takeover as Starmer calls plan ‘wrong’ – live updates

    Israel’s security cabinet approves Gaza City takeover as Starmer calls plan ‘wrong’ – live updates

    This is likely the first phase of a full takeover of Gaza by Israel’s militarypublished at 06:05 British Summer Time

    Hugo Bachega
    Middle East correspondent, reporting from Jerusalem

    Israeli Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu gestures while speakingImage source, Getty Images

    The takeover of Gaza City approved by the Israeli security cabinet is likely to be the first phase of a full takeover of Gaza by the military, as Israel PM Benjamin Netanyahu says this is his intention.

    His plans have faced strong opposition from the military leadership, with the army’s chief of staff, Lt Gen Eyal Zamir, warning him of a “trap”.

    The families of the hostages say an expansion of the offensive, which is likely to last months, will put the 20 captives believed to be alive at risk. There have also been warnings that a push will kill even more Palestinians and worsen the humanitarian crisis in the territory.

    Polls suggest most of the Israeli public favour a deal with Hamas for the release of the hostages and the end of the war. Israeli leaders say Hamas, for now, is not interested in negotiating as, in their view, the group is feeling emboldened by the international pressure on Israel over the humanitarian crisis in Gaza.

    There has been some speculation that the threat of full occupation could be part of a strategy to put pressure on Hamas to make concessions in stalled talks.

    Throughout the war, Netanyahu has been accused of prolonging the conflict to guarantee the survival of his coalition, which relies on the support of ultranationalist ministers who have threatened to quit the government if there is any deal with Hamas.

    In an interview shortly before the cabinet’s meeting, Netanyahu said that Israel planned to hand over the control of Gaza to “Arab forces”, although he did not give details about possible arrangements or which countries could be involved. Still, this was a rare indication of what he might be envisioning for a post-war Gaza.

    Continue Reading

  • Israel-Gaza war live: security cabinet approves Gaza City take over; opposition leader calls decision ‘a disaster’ | Israel

    Israel-Gaza war live: security cabinet approves Gaza City take over; opposition leader calls decision ‘a disaster’ | Israel

    Yair Lapid calls Gaza City takeover decision ‘a disaster’

    Israeli opposition leader Yair Lapid has blasted the security cabinet’s Gaza City decision as “a disaster” and said far-right ministers Itamar Ben Gvir and Bezalel Smotrich dragged the Israeli prime minister into something that was “exactly what Hamas wanted”.

    Lapid also said the decision would lead to the deaths of more hostages and many soldiers as well as “political collapse”.

    His post on X reads in full (in a translation):

    The cabinet’s decision tonight is a disaster that will lead to many more disasters.

    In complete contradiction to the opinion of the military and security ranks, without considering the erosion and exhaustion of the fighting forces, Ben Gvir and Smotrich dragged Netanyahu into a move that will take months, lead to the death of the hostages, the killing of many soldiers, cost tens of billions to the Israeli taxpayer, and lead to a political collapse.

    This is exactly what Hamas wanted: for Israel to be trapped in the field without a goal, without defining the picture of the day after, in a useless occupation that no one understands where it is leading.

    ‘A disaster that will lead to many more disasters’: Israeli opposition leader Yair Lapid. Photograph: Jacquelyn Martin/AP
    Share

    Updated at 

    Key events

    Another major Israeli ground operation will almost certainly lead to the killing of more Israeli soldiers in hit-and-run attacks, eroding domestic support for the war, and could endanger the remaining hostages, as the AP reports.

    Hamas-led militants killed about 1,200 people in the October 2023 attack and abducted 251 hostages, most of whom since been released in ceasefires or other deals. Fifty remain in the territory, around 20 of whom are believed by Israel to be alive.

    Palestinian militants have released videos in recent days showing emaciated hostages, saying they are suffering the same starvation as the Palestinian population.

    Hamas is believed to be holding the hostages in tunnels and other secret locations and has hinted it will kill them if Israeli forces draw near.

    Former security officials have also spoken out against further military operations, saying there is little to gain after Hamas has been militarily decimated.

    Israel’s military chief of staff, Lt Gen Eyal Zamir, reportedly argued during the security cabinet meeting that a more sweeping plan to retake all of Gaza would endanger the hostages and put added strain on the army after two years of regional wars.

    Share

    Yair Lapid calls Gaza City takeover decision ‘a disaster’

    Israeli opposition leader Yair Lapid has blasted the security cabinet’s Gaza City decision as “a disaster” and said far-right ministers Itamar Ben Gvir and Bezalel Smotrich dragged the Israeli prime minister into something that was “exactly what Hamas wanted”.

    Lapid also said the decision would lead to the deaths of more hostages and many soldiers as well as “political collapse”.

    His post on X reads in full (in a translation):

    The cabinet’s decision tonight is a disaster that will lead to many more disasters.

    In complete contradiction to the opinion of the military and security ranks, without considering the erosion and exhaustion of the fighting forces, Ben Gvir and Smotrich dragged Netanyahu into a move that will take months, lead to the death of the hostages, the killing of many soldiers, cost tens of billions to the Israeli taxpayer, and lead to a political collapse.

    This is exactly what Hamas wanted: for Israel to be trapped in the field without a goal, without defining the picture of the day after, in a useless occupation that no one understands where it is leading.

    ‘A disaster that will lead to many more disasters’: Israeli opposition leader Yair Lapid. Photograph: Jacquelyn Martin/AP
    Share

    Updated at 

    The UK’s ambassador to Israel has said extending the war in Gaza would only lead to more deaths and that occupying Gaza would be a “huge mistake”.

    Simon Walters was quoted by Israel’s Haaretz newspaper as saying on Thursday:

    The IDF has achieved all that it can achieve in Gaza, and extending the war any further will simply lead to more deaths. Deaths of soldiers, deaths of Palestinians, deaths of hostages.

    If you want to defeat Hamas, you cannot achieve that through military force. You need to use politics and diplomacy and you need to give the people of Gaza an alternative to Hamas.

    Walters said the UK’s approach to the ceasefire proposal set forth by US special envoy Steve Witkoff – for one full and comprehensive deal that brings back all hostages – would end the war and initiate a new governing body for the Gaza Strip, Haaretz reported.

    Walters said:

    We are working with friends, allies in Europe and in the Middle East to generate a real plan for what happens after the fighting stops, after the war.

    It needs to be a description of what the governments will be for Gaza. That has to be governance by Palestinians who are not members of Hamas with a role for the Palestinian Authority.

    Share

    Updated at 

    Looking at Gaza City – which Israel’s security cabinet has earmarked for a military takeover – much of it is in ruins.

    Israel has repeatedly bombarded the city in northern Gaza and it launched major ground operations there within weeks of Hamas’s October 2023 attack that triggered the war. Several neighbourhoods and key infrastructure are almost completely destroyed.

    The Associated Press reports that on the eve of the war it was Gaza’s most populous city, home to about 700,000 people. Hundreds of thousands fled under Israeli evacuation orders at the start of the war but many returned during a ceasefire earlier this year.

    Israel already controls and has largely destroyed around 75% of Gaza, with most of the population of some 2 million Palestinians now sheltering in Gaza City, the central city of Deir al-Balah and the sprawling displacement camps in the Muwasi area along the coast.

    Palestinians inspect the site after Israeli forces hit a health facility belonging to the UN agency for Palestinian refugees (Unrwa) in Gaza City on Wednesday. Photograph: APAImages/Shutterstock
    Share

    Updated at 

    Josh Butler

    Josh Butler

    Australian foreign minister Penny Wong has urged Israel not to follow through on its plans to occupy Gaza, a step she said could constitute a breach of international law.

    After Benjamin Netanyahu’s office said the Israel Defense Forces would prepare to take over Gaza City, Wong pushed back on the plan, telling the Guardian:

    Australia calls on Israel to not go down this path, which will only worsen the humanitarian catastrophe in Gaza.

    Permanent forced displacement is a violation of international law.

    Wong said Australia and international partners were maintaining ongoing calls for a ceasefire, the return of hostages and aid to flow unimpeded.

    A two-state solution is the only pathway to secure an enduring peace – a Palestinian state and the state of Israel, living side-by-side in peace and security within internationally-recognised borders.

    Share

    Israeli media reports disagreement between Netanyahu and top military official

    In announcing the approval of plans to take over Gaza City, the office of Benjamin Netanyahu referred to another plan that had been submitted to the Israeli security cabinet.

    A decisive majority of security cabinet ministers believed that the alternative plan that had been submitted to the security cabinet would neither achieve the defeat of Hamas nor the return of the hostages.

    Israeli media reported that this appeared to be referring to a proposal presented by IDF chief of staff, Lt Gen Eyal Zamir, who has reportedly warned that occupying Gaza would plunge Israel into a “black hole” of prolonged insurgency, humanitarian responsibility and heightened risk to hostages.

    It’s thought that the announcement from the security cabinet to take over Gaza City as opposed to the entire territory – as Netanyahu pledged on Thursday – could reflect the reservations of Israel’s top military officials.

    Share

    Updated at 

    After nearly two years of war in Gaza, Benjamin Netanyahu faces mounting pressure at home and abroad for a truce deal to pull the Palestinian territory’s more than 2 million people back from the brink of famine and to spare hostages held by Palestinian militants.

    Outside the prime minister’s office in Jerusalem on Thursday evening, hundreds of demonstrators protested against any expansion of the war, demanding an immediate end to the military campaign in return for the release of all the hostages.

    Protesters call for a ceasefire in Gaza and for Israeli hostages to be released in front of Netanyahu’s office. Photograph: Anadolu/Getty Images

    Protesters held signs bearing the faces of hostages still held in Gaza and voiced deep frustration with the government’s handling of the crisis.

    “I’m here because I am sick and tired of this government. It’s ruined our life,” said 55-year-old Noa Starkman, a Jerusalem resident who was born in a southern Israeli community close to where Hamas attacked in October 2023.

    Share

    Updated at 

    Indonesia will convert a medical facility on an uninhabited island to treat about 2,000 wounded residents of Gaza, according to a spokesperson for the president, reports Kate Lamb and agencies.

    “Indonesia will give medical help for about 2,000 Gaza residents who became victims of war, those who are wounded, buried under debris,” Hasan Nasbi said in Jakarta on Thursday.

    Indonesia plans to allocate the facility on Galang island, home to a former refugee camp for Vietnamese asylum seekers which lies off its island of Sumatra, to treat the wounded Gaza residents and temporarily shelter their families, the spokesperson said.

    The patients would be taken back to Gaza after they had healed, he added, without providing further details on the timing of the plan, or how their return would be guaranteed.

    Demonstrators in West Java, Indonesia, rally in solidarity with Palestinian people last year. Photograph: Mast Irham/EPA

    Muslim-majority Indonesia has sent humanitarian aid to Gaza during the war and the announcement follows an Axios report in July that the director of Israel’s Mossad spy agency had sought US help in convincing several countries – including Indonesia, Libya and Ethiopia – to take in hundreds of thousands of Palestinians from Gaza.

    See the full report here:

    Share

    Updated at 

    The Axios reporter Barak Ravid has cited an Israeli official as saying Israel’s occupation of Gaza City is to involve besieging Hamas fighters there while carrying out a ground offensive.

    Ravid’s post on X says:

    Senior Israeli official tells me: The operation that the IDF is currently preparing for is only in Gaza City. The goal is to evacuate all Palestinian civilians from Gaza City to the central camps and other areas by October 7. A siege will be imposed on the Hamas militants who remain in Gaza City, and at the same time, a ground offensive will be carried out in Gaza City. The Prime Minister and the Defense Minister have been authorized to approve the IDF’s final operational plan

    Share

    The Israeli prime minister’s office also said the “vast majority of cabinet ministers believed that the alternative plan presented in the cabinet would not achieve the defeat of Hamas nor the return of the hostages”.

    Netanyahu’s office said on X that the security cabinet voted by a majority to adopt what he called “the five principles for ending the war”. It listed them as (translated from Hebrew):

    1. Disarming Hamas of its weapons.

    2. Return of all hostages – both the living and the deceased.

    3. Demilitarization of the Gaza Strip.

    4. Israeli security control over the Gaza Strip.

    5. Establishment of an alternative civilian administration that is neither Hamas nor the Palestinian Authority.

    Share

    Updated at 

    Benjamin Netanyahu’s office has said on social media that the Israel Defense Forces will prepare to take over Gaza City and to provide aid to civilians outside the areas of fighting.

    The full post on X (translated from Hebrew) reads:

    The Political-Security Cabinet approved the Prime Minister’s proposal for the defeat of Hamas.

    The IDF will prepare to take control of Gaza City while providing humanitarian aid to the civilian population outside the combat zones.

    Share

    Updated at 

    Opening summary

    Welcome to our live coverage of the Israel-Gaza war.

    Benjamin Netanyahu’s office says Israel’s security cabinet has approved a plan to take over Gaza City after he earlier said the country intended to take full control of the entire Gaza Strip.

    The decision early on Friday marks another escalation of Israel’s offensive in Gaza.

    Ahead of the security cabinet meeting, which began on Thursday and ran through the night, Netanyahu said Israel planned to retake control over the whole territory and eventually hand it off to friendly Arab forces opposed to Hamas.

    The announced plans stop short of that, perhaps reflecting the reservations of Israel’s top general, who reportedly warned that it would endanger the remaining 20 or so living hostages held by Hamas and further strain Israel’s army after nearly two years of regional wars, the Associated Press reports.

    Many families of hostages are also opposed, fearing further escalation will doom their loved ones.

    A Hamas official was reported as telling the Al Jazeera Mubasher television network that the militant group would treat any force formed to govern Gaza per Netanyahu’s suggestion as an “occupying” force linked the Israel. And in the first reaction by a main Arab neighbour to Netanyahu’s comments, a Jordanian official told Reuters that Arabs “will only support what Palestinians agree and decide on”.

    Protesters outside Benjamin Netanyahu’s office in Jerusalem on Thursday demand the release of the hostages held in Gaza. Photograph: Ronen Zvulun/Reuters

    In key developments:

    • Before the security cabinet meeting, Netanyahu was asked on Fox News if Israel would “take control of all of Gaza” and he replied: “We intend to, in order to assure our security, remove Hamas there, enable the population to be free of Gaza.” The Israeli prime minister said: “We don’t want to keep it. We want to have a security perimeter. We want to hand it over to Arab forces that will govern it properly without threatening us and giving Gazans a good life.”

    • Israeli media reported that Netanyahu was hoping to obtain approval for fully controlling Gaza at the security cabinet meeting. The plan would mean sending ground troops into the few areas of the strip that have not been totally destroyed – roughly 25% of the territory where many of its 2 million people have sought refuge.

    • Israel was reportedly preparing a two-phase operation aimed at seizing control of Gaza City, with plans to evacuate about 1 million residents – half of Gaza’s population – in what officials described as a temporary measure to establish civilian infrastructure in central Gaza.

    • The proposal was being framed as a limited operation rather than a full invasion, apparently to placate military chiefs wary of long-term occupation, according to Israel’s Channel 12. The chief of staff, Lt Gen Eyal Zamir, has reportedly warned that occupying Gaza would plunge Israel into a “black hole” of prolonged insurgency, humanitarian responsibility and heightened risk to hostages.

    • At least 42 Palestinians were killed in Israeli airstrikes and shootings across southern Gaza on Thursday, according to local hospitals. Of the 42, at least 13 were seeking aid in an Israeli military zone in southern Gaza where UN aid convoys are regularly overwhelmed by looters and desperate crowds.

    • The World Health Organization said on Thursday that 99 people were known to have died from malnutrition in Gaza this year and the figure was probably an underestimate, amid famine warnings from UN agencies.

    • The families of the roughly 20 remaining living hostages held in Gaza have called for Israelis to protest against the government and a decision they fear would endanger the lives of their loved ones.

    Share

    Updated at 

    Continue Reading

  • Trump tariffs on Russia's oil buyers bring economic, political risks – Reuters

    1. Trump tariffs on Russia’s oil buyers bring economic, political risks  Reuters
    2. Why the oil market believes Trump will back down from tariffs on Russian crude buyers  CNBC
    3. Press Release: Blumenthal Issues Statement on Russian Sanctions Following Trump’s Deadline Expiration  Quiver Quantitative
    4. China-Russia trade hits 2025 high as Trump hints at 25% tariff over oil imports  South China Morning Post
    5. Sanctioning the Supply Chain: Why US Tariffs on Russian Oil Buyers Could Backfire  Finance Magnates

    Continue Reading

  • Xi Keeps Quiet as Trump Targets India Over Russia Ties – Bloomberg.com

    Xi Keeps Quiet as Trump Targets India Over Russia Ties – Bloomberg.com

    1. Xi Keeps Quiet as Trump Targets India Over Russia Ties  Bloomberg.com
    2. Why the oil market believes Trump will back down from tariffs on Russian crude buyers  CNBC
    3. India has 20 days to avoid 50% Trump tariffs – what are its options?  BBC
    4. India’s Modi unwilling to compromise on agriculture as US tariff war escalates  Dawn
    5. ADDRESSING THREATS TO THE UNITED STATES BY THE GOVERNMENT OF THE RUSSIAN FEDERATION  The White House (.gov)

    Continue Reading

  • PM Modi’s claim of special relationship with Trump stands totally exposed: Congress

    PM Modi’s claim of special relationship with Trump stands totally exposed: Congress

    Congress said PM Modi’s claim of having a special relationship with U.S. President Donald Trump “now stands totally exposed”. File

    Amid reports that Pakistan Army chief Asim Munir is set to visit the U.S. for the second time since the four-day conflict with India, the Congress on Friday (August 8, 2025) said Prime Minister Narendra Modi’s claim of having a special relationship with U.S. President Donald Trump “now stands totally exposed”.

    Congress general secretary in-charge communications Jairam Ramesh said, “Field Marshal Asim Munir, whose incendiary and inflammatory remarks provided the immediate backdrop to the brutal terror attacks in Pahalgam on April 22, 2025, appears to be a favourite of the U.S..”

    He was hosted to an unprecedented lunch on June 18, 2025, in Washington DC by President Trump, Mr. Ramesh pointed out.

    “The Pakistan Army Chief is soon going to America again to attend a farewell function for the retiring US Central Command Chief Gen. Michael Kurilla–the same General Kurilla who had on June 10, 2025, called Pakistan, in his own words, ‘a phenomenal partner in counter-terrorism operations.’ What a bizarre certificate this was,” he said in a post on X.

    “Prime Minister Modi has been claiming a special relationship with President Trump. That now stands totally exposed,” Mr. Ramesh said.

    He also pointed out that since January 2025, the U.S. does not have a regular Ambassador in New Delhi nor has it named anyone yet for confirmation by the U.S. Senate — unlike for other key countries like China.

    Mr. Munir is expected to visit the U.S. this week for consultations with top American officials, his second trip to Washington since the four-day conflict with India, Dawn News reported.

    Also Read | Trump’s imposition of 50% tariff is economic blackmail to secure unfair trade deal: Rahul Gandhi

    In June, Mr. Munir travelled to the U.S. on a rare five-day trip during which he attended a private luncheon with President Trump. That meeting culminated in Mr. Trump’s announcement of enhanced U.S.-Pakistan cooperation in various fields, including an oil deal.

    After his meeting with Mr. Trump in June, Mr. Munir had held a comprehensive and candid exchange with senior scholars, analysts, policy experts, and representatives of leading international media outlets in Washington.

    His visit to the U.S. came weeks after the four-day conflict between India and Pakistan following the April 22 Pahalgam terror attack.


    Continue Reading

  • Is Perrier as pure as it claims? The bottled water scandal gripping France

    Is Perrier as pure as it claims? The bottled water scandal gripping France

    Hugh Schofield

    Paris correspondent

    Getty Images A man pours a bottle of Perrier water into a glass on a barGetty Images

    Major brands like Perrier are under the spotlight after the scandal broke in France

    France’s multi-billion euro mineral water companies are under the spotlight because of climate change and growing concerns about the industry’s environmental impact.

    At issue is whether some world-famous brands, notably the iconic Perrier label, can even continue calling themselves “natural mineral water”.

    A decision in the Perrier case is due in the coming months. It follows revelations in the French media about illicit filtration systems that have been widely used in the industry, apparently because of worries about water contamination, after years of drought linked to climate change.

    “This really is our Water-gate,” says Stéphane Mandard, who has led investigations at Le Monde newspaper. “It’s a combination of industrial fraud and state collusion.”

    “And now there is a real Sword of Damocles hanging over the head of Perrier.”

    According to hydrologist Emma Haziza, “the commercial model of the big producers has worked very well. But it is absolutely not sustainable at a time of global climate change”.

    “When you have big brands that feel they have no choice but to treat their water – that means they know there is a problem with the quality.”

    Getty Images Bottles of Perrier, Yorre, Vichy, Vittel, Cristaline, Contrex and Hepar water stand next to each other on a tableGetty Images

    EU law says natural mineral water should be unaltered between the underground source and the bottle

    The story hit the headlines a year ago in France after an investigation by Le Monde and Radio France revealed that at least a third of mineral water sold in France had been illegally treated, either with ultra-violet light, carbon filters or ultra-fine micro-meshes commonly used to screen out bacteria.

    The issue was not one of public health. The treated water was by definition safe to drink.

    The problem was that under EU law, “natural mineral water” – which sells at a huge premium over tap water – is supposed to be unaltered between the underground source and the bottle. That is the whole point of it.

    If brands like Evian, Vichy and Perrier have been so successful in France and around the world, it is thanks to an appealing image of mountain-sides, rushing streams, purity and health-giving minerals.

    Admit filtering the water, and the industry risks breaking the market spell. Consumers might begin to ask what they’d been paying for.

    Complicating matters for Perrier and its parent company Nestlé – as well as President Emmanuel Macron’s government – is the charge that executives and ministers conspired to keep the affair quiet, covered up reports of contamination, and re-wrote the rules so that Perrier could continue using micro-filtration.

    In their investigations, Le Monde and Radio France alleged that the government considered the mineral water industry so strategic that it agreed to suppress damaging information. A senate inquiry into the affair accused the government of a “deliberate strategy” of “dissimulation”.

    Responding to the allegations, the government has asked the European Commission to rule on what level of micro-filtration is permissible for “natural mineral water”. Aurelien Rousseau, who was head of Prime Minister Élisabeth Borne’s cabinet at the time, admitted there had been an “error of appreciation” but insisted there was never any risk to public health.

    Getty Images French Senator Alexandre Ouizille (C), flanked by French Senators Laurent Burgoa (L) and Antoinette Guhl (R), presents the Senate commission of enquiry report about French industrial mineral waters during a press conference at the French Senate, Upper house of the French Parliament, in Paris on May 19, 2025Getty Images

    A senate report concluded that France’s government covered up the water scandal “at the highest level”

    Earlier this year, at the senate hearing into the industry, Nestlé’s CEO Laurent Freixe admitted that Perrier had indeed used illicit methods to treat its water.

    But he also had another admission: that an official hydrologists’ report into the company’s historic site in the Gard department in southern France had recommended against renewing “natural mineral water” status for the company’s output.

    It raises the possibility that for the first time in its 160-year history, Perrier water may soon not be labelled as what people assume it to be.

    According to the hydrologist Emma Haziza, “the link to climate change and global warming is absolutely established”. And if Perrier is feeling the impact ahead of other companies, it is probably because its geographical location sets it apart.

    Far from the remote mountain landscape you might imagine, Perrier’s water is pumped from deep aquifers in the coastal plain between Nîmes and Montpellier, a short drive from the Mediterranean. The area is populous, heavily-farmed, and very hot.

    “There has been a big climatic shift since 2017,” says Haziza. “For five years there was a succession of droughts, which were particularly badly felt in the south.”

    A woman with long wavy strawberry blonde hair in a white shirt and glasses stands in front of a river in the south of France

    Emma Haziza says climate change is causing a lot of problems in the south of France

    “All the aquifers were affected. This means not just the upper water-table, which is where everyday tap water comes from. We can now see that the deeper aquifers – which the companies thought were protected – are also being hit.

    “The unforeseen is taking place. We are moving from a period in which companies could draw water from the deep aquifers and be sure they would be replenished, to a period in which it’s obvious the whole system cannot go on.”

    The analysis made by Haziza and other hydrologists is that there is now a clear link between deeper and surface aquifers. Contaminants (farm chemicals or human waste) that drain off the land in the increasingly frequent flash floods, can now make their way into the lower aquifers.

    At the same time, the effects of long-term drought and over-pumping mean these lower aquifers contain less volume, so any contamination will be more concentrated, the experts say.

    “We can foresee that what has happened first at Perrier’s site will happen to other producers in the years to come. That’s why we need to move away from our current model of consumption,” says Haziza.

    A smiling man with a beard and moustache wearing a black shirt stands on a sunny road in the south of France

    Perrier hydrologist Jérémie Pralong insists their water is “100%” pure

    Last year at the Perrier site, three million bottles had to be destroyed because of a contamination. But the company insists that any problems are swiftly detected; and it disputes the claim that contaminants are entering the deep aquifers.

    “We are pumping water from 130 metres underground, beneath layers of limestone,” says Perrier hydrologist Jérémie Pralong. “We are 100% convinced of the purity of the water. And its mineral make-up is constant.”

    Perrier says there is no EU ruling that specifically bans micro-filtration. The relevant text simply says that nothing must be done to disinfect or alter the mineral make-up of the water. The argument is over at what measure of micro-filtration alteration begins.

    The original Perrier source was first tapped by a local doctor in the 1860s, but it was under British management that the brand took off 50 years later.

    St John Harmsworth – brother of newspaper magnates Lords Northcliffe and Rothermere – made Perrier a byword for mineral water across the British empire.

    According to company lore, Harmsworth took inspiration for the bottles’ bulbous shape from the Indian clubs he used for exercise following a crippling car accident.

    Today the bottling plant at Vergèze is still next to Harmsworth’s residence and the original source. The plant has been heavily automated. A rail track connects with the SNCF network to bring hundreds of millions of cans and bottles every year to Marseille for export.

    Crates of Perrier bottles travel around a factory floor on conveyor belts

    Perrier’s bottling plant is still next to the water’s original source at Vergèze

    The focus for the last year has been on a new brand: Maison Perrier. These energy and flavoured drinks are proving highly successful in France and around the world.

    The advantage for Perrier is that the new beverages do not claim to be “natural mineral water”. They can be treated and filtered without difficulty.

    Perrier says the new brand is part of the mix, and that it has no intention of abandoning its original Source Perrier natural mineral water. It has stopped the ultra-fine (0.2 micron) microfiltration, and now uses a 0.45 micron system which has been agreed with government.

    It has applied for “natural mineral water” status for just two out of the five drilling wells it was using for Perrier mineral water. A decision is due later this year.

    A thin, grey banner promoting the News Daily newsletter. On the right, there is a graphic of an orange sphere with two concentric crescent shapes around it in a red-orange gradient, like a sound wave. The banner reads: "The latest news in your inbox first thing.”

    Get our flagship newsletter with all the headlines you need to start the day. Sign up here.

    Continue Reading