- Amid Real but Unequal Progress, Breakthrough Still Possible: UN Stats Report SDG Knowledge Hub
- UN Report warns world is drastically off-track to meet 2030 SDGs Ptv.com.pk
- Five years to go, India’s climate action SDGs show worsening trend Scroll.in
- ‘A compass towards progress’ – but key development goals remain way off track UN News
- UN: Only 35% Of Sustainable Development Goals On Track bernama
Category: 2. World
-
Amid Real but Unequal Progress, Breakthrough Still Possible: UN Stats Report – SDG Knowledge Hub
-
Official says Gaza deal ‘more likely than not,’ as Israel said to retract pullback demands – The Times of Israel
- Official says Gaza deal ‘more likely than not,’ as Israel said to retract pullback demands The Times of Israel
- Trump hosts Qatar’s PM for private dinner, meets Bahrain crown prince Al Jazeera
- Gaza ceasefire talks on verge of collapse, Palestinian officials say BBC
- Netanyahu is stroking Trump’s ego: But will flattery buy a ceasefire in Gaza? Arab Center Washington DC
- Trump says there is ‘good news’ on Gaza as he prepares to meet Qatari premier Anadolu Ajansı
Continue Reading
-
UK offered to speed up resettlement case of Afghan who posted leaked data online
Joel Gunter and Hannah O’GradyBBC News
PA
British troops leaving Camp Bastion in Helmand Provice, Afghanistan, in 2014 The Ministry of Defence offered to expedite the review of a rejected resettlement application of an Afghan national after he posted sensitive details from a data breach on Facebook, the BBC understands.
The man published nine names from a dataset containing details of thousands of Afghans who applied to be relocated to the UK after the Taliban seized power, and indicated he could release the rest.
He obtained the details after they were sent out from UK Special Forces headquarters in an accidental data breach in February 2022.
British authorities tracked the man down and strongly requested he take the data down, offering an expedited review of his rejected resettlement application in return.
The BBC understands the man is now in the UK, having had his rejected application overturned. He is not believed to be facing any criminal charges in relation to his conduct.
Government sources close to the process told the BBC the individual had essentially blackmailed his way into the country using the leaked dataset.
When asked about the actions of the individual and his subsequent relocation to the UK, the MoD declined to comment on the case.
A spokesperson said “anyone who comes to the UK under any Afghan relocation schemes” must go through “robust security checks in order to gain entry”.
The BBC has also approached the Met Police for comment.
Getty Images
Protesters in London in 2021 called for the safe evacuation of Afghans that had worked with the British military Johnny Mercer, the former veterans minister, who was covered by the super-injunction because of his knowledge of the events, told the BBC the breach was representative of the “chaos” around the relocation process, and the individual brought to the UK had used the data to get in.
“He put the names on Facebook and essentially bribed the MoD to get in the country. The Ministry of Defence offered to expedite his case and next thing you know he’s in the UK,” Mercer said.
“There were multiple data leaks from the MoD regarding these applications. I think that gives you some sense of the chaos and lack of care in how things were being run at that time.”
The breach occurred in February 2022 after someone working in UK Special Forces (UKSF) headquarters accidentally emailed the personal data of every applicant to the UK’s Afghan resettlement scheme to date – nearly 19,000 people – to someone outside government.
The data was sent to an Afghan person living in the UK, who passed the information onto others, including people in Afghanistan. One individual in Afghanistan, after having his application rejected, posted some of the data on Facebook.
Alerting a defence minister to the presence of the data on Facebook in August 2023, an MoD case worker helping people seeking relocation called the possibility the Taliban might get hold of it “bone-chilling”.
The data came from the Afghan Relocations and Assistance Policy (Arap) resettlement scheme, set up in 2021 as the Taliban seized control of Afghanistan.
It was highly sensitive because Afghan nationals who worked with the British government during the conflict with the Taliban were at risk of serious harm and even execution with the group back in power.
The breach led to the previous government setting up a secret £850m emergency resettlement scheme to bring some of those in the database to the UK.
Both the breach and subsequent scheme were kept secret by an unprecedented super-injunction, until it was lifted by High Court judge Mr Justice Chamberlain on Tuesday.
The emergency scheme – known as the Afghanistan Response Route and set up in April 2024 – has resulted in about 4,500 Afghans being brought to the UK so far, with a further 2,400 expected.
The government announced this week the scheme was being closed down, but said relocation offers already made to those who remain in Afghanistan would be honoured.
Special forces veto had role in breach
The UKSF official who inadvertently leaked the data was assisting with the verification of a small number of applications from Afghan special forces when the accidental breach occurred.
The official was in possession of the full dataset because UKSF – the umbrella group containing the SAS and SBS – was given a secret veto over Arap applications from former members of Afghan special forces.
The BBC revealed last year that UKSF had used that veto to block hundreds of Afghan commandos who had fought alongside the SAS and SBS from relocating to the UK.
Documents obtained by Panorama showed special forces had rejected applications despite some containing compelling evidence of service alongside the SAS on dangerous night raid operations.
The personal information of many of those Afghan special forces were included in the massive data breach revealed this week.
But sources told the BBC they were sidelined in the emergency evacuation process and their cases were essentially paused, while case workers were instructed to prioritise people who had worked on British military bases for urgent evacuation.
Downing Street refused to say on Tuesday whether the UKSF official who accidentally leaked the data had faced disciplinary action. The BBC has confirmed he is no longer in the post he occupied at the time of the breach.
The MoD refused to comment on how many applicants affected by the breach had been harmed by the Taliban in the years since it happened. It said some of those whose data was compromised by the breach were not informed until after the lifting of the super-injunction.
Defence Secretary John Healey told the BBC on Wednesday he was “unable to say for sure” that no Afghans were killed as a result of the data breach, and the Taliban would “almost certainly” have held the same type of information.
Speaking in the Commons on Tuesday, he offered a “sincere apology” to those whose details had been included in the breach, which he described as a “serious departmental error” and a “clear breach of strict data protection protocols”.
Healey told MPs an independent review had found it was “highly unlikely” an individual would have been targeted solely because of the breach.
In a 2024 High Court judgement made public on Tuesday, Mr Justice Chamberlain said it was “quite possible” that some of those who saw parts of the leaked document in a Facebook group “were Taliban infiltrators or spoke about it to Taliban-aligned individuals”.
Erin Alcock, a lawyer for the firm Leigh Day, which has assisted hundreds of Arap applicants including dozens of former Afghan commandos, said the breach represented a “catastrophic failure” of the government to “protect the personal information, and therefore the safety, of what is an extremely vulnerable group of individuals”.
Do you have information about this story that you want to share?
Get in touch using SecureDrop, a highly anonymous and secure way of whistleblowing to the BBC which uses the TOR network.
Or by using the Signal messaging app, an end-to-end encrypted message service designed to protect your data.
SecureDrop or Signal: 0044 7714 956 936
Please note that the SecureDrop link will only work in a Tor browser. For information on keeping secure and anonymous, here’s some advice on how to use SecureDrop.
It’s proved a really important way for people to get in touch with us in the past.
Continue Reading
-
Displacement, poverty and insecurity fueling violence against women in Gaza – UN News
- Displacement, poverty and insecurity fueling violence against women in Gaza UN News
- More misery as new Israeli evacuation orders impact tens of thousands of people in Gaza: UN Associated Press of Pakistan
- Life in Gaza is ‘Russian roulette with a bullet in almost every chamber’: Palestinian envoy tells UN TRT Global
- UN Relief Chief warns Security Council: Erosion of rules of war in Gaza demands urgent response OCHA
- Reported impact snapshot | Gaza Strip, 9 July 2025 at 15:00 ReliefWeb
Continue Reading
-
(Not the Funniest) Weekend Update: Recap of Recent Developments in the EU-US Tariff Dispute
Since taking office earlier this year, the Trump administration has reignited tariff disputes between the European Union and the United States. The US has reimposed US Section 232 measures on steel and aluminum, extended the scope of these measures, and, on April 2nd, imposed IEEPA tariffs on EU products under the International Emergency Economic Powers Act. These IEEPA tariffs were then reduced to 10% until July 9th.
In response, the EU issued a list of US goods worth EUR 21 billion that would face additional customs duties as countermeasures to the US Section 232 measures. These countermeasures were then immediately suspended until July 14th to allow for negotiations.
Over the weekend of July 12th/13th, both the Trump administration and the European Commission made announcements about the ongoing tariff dispute. We go over these in this alert.
1. US measures
-
- On July 12th, US President Trump announced that his administration will impose an additional 30% tariff on all products from the European Union starting August 1st.
- The Trump administration also threatened to increase the tariff rate on EU products proportionally to the level of retaliation chosen by the EU.
- These 30% tariffs are separate from the sectoral tariffs (e.g., the US Section 232 measures on steel and aluminum).
However, the legal basis for these measures remains unclear. The IEEPA tariffs have been challenged in court, and on May 28th, the US Court of International Trade ruled that “IEEPA does not authorize any of the Worldwide, Retaliatory, or Trafficking Tariff Orders.” On May 29th, the US Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit entered an administrative stay pending appeal.
2. EU measures
-
- The Commission decided to extend the suspension of the countermeasures until August 1st.
- Commission President von der Leyen stated that the EU was still committed to working towards an agreement with the Trump administration.
- The Commission also indicated that it would adopt proportionate countermeasures if they were needed to safeguard EU interests. To that end, the Commission held a preparatory stakeholders’ consultation in May, on countermeasures. This week, as the August 1st deadline approaches, the Commission will propose additional countermeasures to the EU Member States that would target EUR 72 billion in US goods.
- Despite strong advocacy from certain Member States, President von der Leyen indicated that the Commission is reluctance to use the Anti-Coercion Instrument, as EU-US trade relations are not yet in an “extraordinary situation”.
Continue Reading
-
-
Turkey has conveyed its views on Syria strikes to Israel via intelligence agency – Reuters
- Turkey has conveyed its views on Syria strikes to Israel via intelligence agency Reuters
- LIVE: Israel attacks Syria’s Damascus amid fighting in Suwayda Al Jazeera
- Israel bombs Syria army HQ after warning Damascus to leave Druze alone Dawn
- Israel strikes Damascus military HQ as fighting between Syrian forces and Druze continues – live updates BBC
- Powerful Israeli strikes rock Damascus as Syrian forces clash with Druze militias CNN
Continue Reading
-
Analyst hails Pak-China cooperation for a better world – RADIO PAKISTAN
- Analyst hails Pak-China cooperation for a better world RADIO PAKISTAN
- Pakistan, China reaffirm mutual support in security and agriculture on SCO sidelines Dawn
- Dar rejects ‘normalisation of arbitrary force’ The Express Tribune
- ‘Pakistan committed to ceasefire, however…’: Pak Minister Ishaq Dar seeks ‘peace, stability’ with India at SCO Mint
- SCO foreign ministers hold strategic dialogue in Tianjin to discuss pressing regional challenges Ptv.com.pk
Continue Reading
-
Members of The Hague Group declare six 'concrete' steps against Israel at Bogota summit – Middle East Eye
- Members of The Hague Group declare six ‘concrete’ steps against Israel at Bogota summit Middle East Eye
- UN rapporteur demands global action to stop Israel’s ‘genocide’ in Gaza Al Jazeera
- 12 countries commit to arms embargo on Israel to stop its attacks on Gaza Peoples Dispatch
- PI Briefing | No. 25 | To Bogotá Progressive International
- UN’s Albanese hails 30-nation meeting aimed at ending Israeli occupation of Palestine The Guardian
Continue Reading
-
UN chief condemns Israel strikes on Syria: spokesman
UK foreign secretary suggests Israeli minister could be sanctioned over Gaza camp plans
LONDON: The UK foreign secretary has suggested that Israel’s defense minister could be sanctioned over plans to relocate Gaza’s population into a camp in the south of the territory.
Israel Katz told Israeli media last week that he wanted to establish what he described as a “humanitarian city” amid the ruins of Rafah to initially house 600,000 people.
Those entering the camp would be screened to ensure they were not Hamas members, and would not be allowed to leave. The aim would be to move the entire population of Gaza — more than 2 million people — inside the zone.
The plans have been widely condemned, with the UN agency for Palestinian refugees describing the proposed site as a “concentration camp” that would deprive Palestinians of their homeland.
UK Foreign Secretary David Lammy told the International Development Committee on Wednesday that he condemned the “unconscionable” plans in the strongest terms.
Asked whether he would consider sanctions against Katz similar to those imposed by the UK against Israel’s far-right government ministers Itamar Ben-Gvir and Bezalel Smotrich last month, Lammy said he could not comment on sanctions that are under consideration.
“But you have heard my statement about what has been said by minister Katz and you will have heard my statements previously about ministers Smotrich and Ben-Gvir and then the subsequent decision that I took.
“No defense minister should be talking about effectively holding people, unable to leave, presumably, in the manner in which he described,” Lammy added.
The UK government is coming under increased pressure, including from within its own ranks, to take further action against Israel amid daily reports of atrocities in Gaza.
Prime Minister Keir Starmer on Wednesday said he was “appalled” by further reports of civilians being killed in the enclave, “particularly when they are trying to access aid.”
Hundreds of Palestinians have been killed by gunfire in recent weeks as they attempted to access aid distributed by the widely criticized Gaza Humanitarian Foundation, which is run by the US and Israel.
“Each of those incidents does need to be fully and transparently investigated,” Starmer said.
But the prime minister has been accused by his own MPs of not taking a sufficiently tough stance against Israel for its actions in Gaza, where more than 58,000 people have been killed since the conflict began in 2023.
Labour MP Imran Hussain angrily asked Starmer in parliament on Wednesday “how many more horrors must we witness” before the prime minister imposes against Israel the same scale of sanctions that the UK has placed on Russia for its Ukraine invasion.
Last week, almost 60 Labour MPs sent a letter to Lammy responding to Katz’s Gaza plans in which they demanded the UK immediately recognize Palestine as a state, The Guardian reported.
“By not recognizing (Palestine) as a state, we undermine our own policy of a two-state solution and set an expectation that the status quo can continue and see the effective erasure and annexation of Palestinian territory,” the MPs warned.
Asked again on Wednesday whether the UK would recognize Palestinian statehood, Lammy insisted the “symbolic” action needed to be “part of a process,” including the agreement of a ceasefire.
During a state visit to the UK last week, French President Emmanuel Macron urged Starmer to recognize Palestine in tandem with France. He said the move would initiate a political momentum which is “the only path to peace.”
France has suggested it will go ahead with recognition during an international UN conference on a two-state solution later this month. It is co-hosting the event with Saudi Arabia at the UN headquarters in New York with the aim of adopting concrete measures toward implementation of a two-state solution.Continue Reading
-
Israel bombs Syria army HQ after warning Damascus to leave Druze alone – World
Israel bombed the Syrian army’s headquarters in Damascus on Wednesday after warning the government to leave the country’s Druze minority alone, as authorities announced a ceasefire in the community’s southern heartland after deadly sectarian clashes.
Syrian government forces entered the majority-Druze city of Sweida on Tuesday with the stated aim of overseeing a ceasefire agreed with Druze community leaders following days of fighting with local Bedouin tribes.
However, witnesses reported that the government forces joined with the Bedouin in attacking Druze fighters and civilians in a bloody rampage through the city.
The Syrian Observatory for Human Rights war monitor said that the violence in Sweida province since Sunday had left more than 300 people dead, including government forces, local fighters and 27 Druze civilians killed in “summary executions … by members of the defence and interior ministries”.
The Syrian presidency vowed to investigate the “heinous acts” in Sweida and to punish “all those proven to be involved”.
Syrian security forces walk together along a street, after clashes between Syrian government troops and local Druze fighters resumed in the southern Druze city of Sweida, July 16. — Reuters State media said a fresh ceasefire had been agreed, announcing “the deployment of security checkpoints” in Sweida city. A previous truce declared on Tuesday appeared to have had little effect on the ground.
The fighting was the most serious outbreak of violence in Syria since government forces battled Druze fighters in Sweida province and near Damascus in April and May, leaving more than 100 people dead.
The authorities have had strained relations with Syria’s patchwork of religious and ethnic minorities since they toppled longtime leader Bashar al-Assad in December.
Israel, which has its own Druze community, has presented itself as a defender of the group, although some analysts say that is a pretext for pursuing its own military goal of keeping Syrian government forces as far from their shared frontier as possible.
Following Assad’s fall, the Israeli military took control of the UN-monitored demilitarised zone in the Golan Heights and conducted hundreds of strikes on military targets in Syria.
Syrian state TV reported several Israeli strikes today near the army and defence ministry headquarters in central Damascus, with Israel’s army saying it had “struck the entrance of the Syrian regime’s military headquarters”.
AFP images showed the side of a building in the defence complex in ruins after the strike, as smoke billowed over the area.
Israel said it had also struck a “military target” in the area of the presidential palace in Damascus.
The Syrian health ministry said that at least one person was killed and 18 others wounded in the strikes on Damascus.
‘Existential battle’
Turkey, which has backed Syrian interim President Ahmed al-Sharaa’s administration, said “Israel’s attacks on Damascus … constitute an act of sabotage against Syria’s efforts to secure peace, stability and security.”
Israeli Defence Minister Israel Katz called on Damascus to “leave the Druze in Sweida alone”, later threatening to unleash “painful blows” to “eliminate the forces that attacked the Druze until their full withdrawal” from Syria’s south.
Israel said it was sending more troops to the armistice line between the occupied Golan Heights and Syrian-controlled territory.
A military official said some troops would be redeployed there from the Gaza Strip, where Israel’s conflict against Hamas was in its 22nd month.
Dozens of people were crossing the heavily fortified Golan frontier, according to an AFP correspondent in Majdal Shams, a mainly Druze town in the Israeli-annexed area.
A military statement said Israeli forces were “operating to prevent the infiltration” from Syrian territory and to “safely return the civilians who crossed the border” from the Israeli-controlled side.
Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu said in February that southern Syria must be completely demilitarised, warning that Israel would not accept the presence of forces of the government near territory it controls.
The head of the Druze community in Israel, Sheikh Mowafaq Tarif, called the situation “an existential battle for the Druze community”.
Abuses ‘must stop’
Sporadic gunfire continued to ring out in Sweida today, an AFP correspondent reported before the latest ceasefire was announced.
The correspondent counted the bodies of around 30 combatants, some in plain clothes and some in military uniform.
The Observatory, witnesses and Druze armed groups have said government forces took part in fighting alongside the Bedouin against the Druze.
The Syrian defence ministry accused “outlaw groups” of attacking its forces inside the city, saying they are now “continuing to respond to the sources of fire”.
The Bedouin and the Druze have been at loggerheads for decades, with the latest violence triggered by the kidnapping of a Druze vegetable merchant, the Observatory said.
Since they toppled Assad in December, Syria’s authorities and their allies have been repeatedly accused of not doing enough to protect the country’s religious and ethnic minorities.
The United States, a close ally of Israel, was “talking to both sides, all the relevant sides on this and hopefully we can bring it to a conclusion, but we’re very concerned”, according to Secretary of State Marco Rubio.
US President Donald Trump’s administration asked Israel again to halt strikes on Syria and engage in dialogue with the government in Damascus, Axios correspondent Barak Ravid reported, citing a senior US official.
Neither Axios nor Ravid said whether that request came before or after Israeli strikes on Syria’s military headquarters and near the presidential palace in Damascus.
France said that “the abuses targeting civilians, which we strongly condemn, must stop”, while the European Union urged “all external actors” to “fully respect Syria’s sovereignty”.
Germany criticised the airstrikes, urging Tel Aviv to refrain from actions that could destabilise the country, Anadolu reported.
The six-member Gulf Cooperation Council (GCC) also condemned the attacks on Damascus in the “strongest terms”, Al Jazeera reported.
In a statement, GCC Secretary-General Jasem Mohamed Albudaiwi said the air campaign represented a “flagrant violation” of Syria’s sovereignty, “a breach of international laws and norms, and a serious threat to regional security and stability”.
Albudaiwi reiterated the GCC’s support for Syria’s territorial integrity, adding that the continuation of the repeated Israeli attacks had constituted an “irresponsible escalation” and disregarded international efforts to achieve stability in Syria and the region.
He also called for international action to stop the “serious violations, hold the perpetrators accountable, and work diligently to protect the Syrian people and preserve its sovereignty in accordance with the principles of the United Nations Charter and international law”.
Continue Reading