Category: 2. World

  • Abbas decries Israel’s ‘genocide’ and says Hamas will have no role in future Gaza government | Mahmoud Abbas

    Abbas decries Israel’s ‘genocide’ and says Hamas will have no role in future Gaza government | Mahmoud Abbas

    Mahmoud Abbas, the Palestinian Authority president, has decried Israel’s “war of genocide” and settlement expansion, while condemning Hamas and saying the armed group would hand over its weapons in any postwar settlement in a closely watched speech to the United Nations.

    Abbas addressed the gathering by video conference after his visa was revoked by the United States ahead of the 80th session of the United Nations general assembly.

    Reinforcing the global schism over Israel’s war in Gaza, UN member states voted 145-5 to allow Abbas to address the international body remotely after the US barred more than 80 Palestinians from entering the country.

    “What Israel is carrying out is not merely an aggression. It is a war crime and a crime against humanity that is both documented and monitored, and it will be recorded in history books and the pages of international conscience as one of the most horrific chapters of humanitarian tragedy in the 20th and 21st centuries,” Abbas said on Thursday.

    Abbas reiterated a number of declarations he made at a special session led by France and Saudi Arabia on Monday, when France and several other countries formally recognised Palestinian statehood. In the speech, he called for an immediate ceasefire, unimpeded entry for humanitarian aid through UN organisations, the release of Israeli hostages and Palestinian prisoners, and the withdrawal of Israel from territory in Gaza.

    He also issued a rejection of the Palestinian Authority’s rival Hamas, which he said would have no role in a postwar governance of Gaza – a key condition of Israel and the United States. However Abbas and the Palestinian Authority administer the West Bank but not Gaza, and do not have a direct role in negotiations over a ceasefire or postwar planning for Gaza.

    “Despite all that our people have suffered, we reject what Hamas carried out on October 7 – actions that targeted Israeli civilians and took them hostages – because these actions do not represent the Palestinian people, nor do they represent their just struggle for freedom and independence,” he said.

    He said that Gaza was an “integral part of the state of Palestine, and that we are ready to bear full responsibility for governance and security there”.

    He also directed attention to Israel’s expansion of settlements in the West Bank, rejecting what he called the ambitions of the Israeli prime minister, Benjamin Netanyahu, of constructing a “greater Israel”. Plans to expand the E1 settlement would “divide the West Bank into two parts and would isolate occupied Jerusalem from its surroundings and would undermine the option of the two-state solution, in a blatant violation of international law and relevant security council resolutions”.

    Netanyahu is scheduled to speak at the United Nations on Friday. Rightwing allies in his government have called for a formal annexation of up to 82% of the West Bank, a “red line” for a number of US allies in the Gulf that would deepen a global standoff pitting Europe and Arab states against Israel and its main backer, the United States.

    Emmanuel Macron, France’s president, on Wednesday said that he believed the US would also restrain Israel from formally annexing territory in the West Bank, telling the France 24 television channel: “I think it is a red line for the USA.”

    In the speech, Abbas also condemned the conflation of support for Palestine with antisemitism, thanking “all the peoples and organizations around the world who protested in support of the rights of the Palestinian people to freedom and independence and to stop the war, destruction and starvation”.

    Finally, he said that Palestinians would not leave their lands.

    “Palestine is ours. Jerusalem is the jewel of our heart and our eternal capital,” he said. “We will not leave our homeland.”

    Continue Reading

  • Israel is guilty of war crimes, Palestine’s Abbas tells UN General Assembly | Israel-Palestine conflict News

    Israel is guilty of war crimes, Palestine’s Abbas tells UN General Assembly | Israel-Palestine conflict News

    Palestinian Authority President Mahmoud Abbas has decried Israel’s use of starvation as a weapon, calling out “the extremist Israeli government” for its continued settlement projects that make a future Palestinian state virtually impossible.

    The 89-year-old addressed world leaders gathered for the United Nations General Assembly via videolink on Thursday after being refused a visa by the United States to travel to New York.

    Recommended Stories

    list of 3 itemsend of list

    “I speak to you today after almost two years in which our Palestinian people in the Gaza Strip have been facing a war of genocide, destruction, starvation and displacement,” Abbas said.

    Addressing genocide

    The Palestinian leader began his speech by denouncing Israel’s genocidal war in Gaza, which has killed at least 65,419 people and wounded 167,160 since October 2023, according to local health authorities. Thousands more are believed to be buried under the rubble of homes and office buildings devastated by Israeli air strikes.

    A total of 1,139 people were killed in Israel during the Hamas-led October 7, 2023, attacks, and roughly 200 were taken captive to Gaza.

    “What Israel is carrying out is not merely an aggression,” Abbas said.

    “It is a war crime and a crime against humanity that is both documented and monitored, and it will be recorded in history books and the pages of international conscience as one of the most horrific chapters of humanitarian tragedy in the 20th and 21st centuries.”

    The UN outlined Israel’s plans to destroy life in Gaza in a report released on Tuesday, which found that Israeli forces have “systematically destroyed” civilian life across Gaza over the past two years.

    “Since October 2023, Israeli officials have demonstrated a clear and consistent intent to establish permanent military control over Gaza and to change its demographic composition while systematically destroying Palestinian life in Gaza,” the report said. It cited Israeli demolition of wells, sewage-pumping stations and wastewater treatment plants as well as the destruction of educational institutions, mosques and cemeteries.

    Last week, a UN inquiry found that Israel’s war on Gaza is a genocide, a landmark moment after nearly two years of conflict that critics have called a war of vengeance without any specific goals.

    Israel’s assault on Gaza intensified this week with at least 85 Palestinians killed across the territory on Wednesday.

    No role for Hamas

    Despite the ongoing hostilities, Abbas was clear about Hamas. He soundly rejected the group’s actions on October 7, 2023, saying the targeting of civilians and taking of captives does “not represent the Palestinian people, nor do they represent their just struggle for freedom and independence”.

    Abbas insisted “Hamas will not have a role to play in governance,” saying Hamas and other factions will have to hand over their weapons as part of a state-building process.

    Palestinian Authority President Mahmoud Abbas speaks during the United Nations General Assembly [Timothy Clary/AFP]

    Israel’s illegal settlements

    Abbas turned his attention to Israel’s settlements in the occupied West Bank, which are illegal under international law. He said: “The extremist Israeli government continues to implement its settlement disease through illegal settlement expansion and developing projects for annexing settlements.”

    Israeli Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu moved forward last week with a settlement expansion plan in the West Bank that would make any future Palestinian state virtually impossible.

    The Israeli leader signed an agreement to move forward with the project, which would bisect the West Bank, saying he was fulfilling his promise that “there will be no Palestinian state”.

    Abbas called this plan “a blatant violation of international law and relevant Security Council resolutions”.

    “Our people in the West Bank, including East Jerusalem, and in the Gaza Strip, are still living through the tragedies of the Israeli aggression and occupation for decades,” Abbas said in his speech. “Years that our people have spent under occupation, killing, arrests and settlement and the theft of money, property and lands, and this still continues without any deterrent or accountability.”

    While concluding his speech, Abbas outlined several of the Palestinian Authority’s positions, including the need for an immediate and permanent end to the war in Gaza, the release of all captives and prisoners on both sides, and the need for a guarantee that residents of the Gaza Strip will be able to remain on their lands without displacement.

    “No matter how much our wounds bleed and no matter how long this suffering lasts, it will not break our will to live and survive,” Abbas said at the end of his speech.

    Where do negotiations go from here?

    Abbas was careful not to criticise the US government, but notably, he was not in attendance in New York.

    “What’s interesting is that there’s really active diplomacy going on here, and Palestine is not present for that either,” Al Jazeera’s James Bays said after Abbas’s address, referring to a meeting this week between US President Donald Trump and Arab and Muslim leaders. From that meeting came a 21-point peace plan presented by Trump that includes a provision to stop Netanyahu from full annexation of the West Bank, Bays reported, quoting US special envoy Steve Witkoff.

    While this may be a notable step forward, it is a step that was negotiated without Abbas.

    “It is a plan that has been negotiated without the Palestinian Authority. Is the Palestinian Authority, under the Trump plan, going to play a role in the future of Gaza and, for that matter, the West Bank?” Bays said on Thursday from UN headquarters in New York.

    Martin Griffiths, director of the Mediation Group International and a former top UN official, told Al Jazeera it’s ominous that no Palestinians appear to have been consulted about the proposal.

    “I think it was very telling that in the Steve Witkoff comments, he made no mention of the Palestinians. I mean that is a red light, in my view, if you don’t include the people under consideration, and it tells us something profound about the possible plan,” Griffiths said.

    Continue Reading

  • Trump urges Turkey’s Erdogan to stop buying Russian oil – World

    Trump urges Turkey’s Erdogan to stop buying Russian oil – World

    United States President Donald Trump on Thursday urged Turkish counterpart Recep Tayyip Erdogan to stop buying Russian oil over the war in Ukraine, as Erdogan sought a long-awaited deal to buy US stealth fighter jets.

    As Erdogan visited the White House for the first time since 2019 during Trump’s first term, Trump called on him to use his influence with Russian President Vladimir Putin to end Moscow’s invasion.

    Trump said that he would discuss Ankara’s wish to buy high-tech F-35 aircraft and was ready to end sanctions on Turkey over its purchase of Russian air defence missiles.

    Nato ally Turkey was booted out of the flagship US stealth fighter programme during Trump’s first term after it defiantly bought Russia’s S-400 surface-to-air missile system.

    “I’d like to have him stop buying any oil from Russia while Russia continues this rampage,” Trump told reporters alongside Erdogan in the Oval Office.

    Trump said Erdogan was “very respected” by both Putin and Ukrainian President Volodymyr Zelensky and “could have a big influence if he wanted to.
    Right now, he’s being very neutral.

    “The best thing he could do is not buy oil and gas from Russia,” Trump added.

    Asked when the US sanctions on Turkey’s defence sector imposed over the Russian missiles could end, Trump replied: “If we have a good meeting, almost immediately.”

    The first Trump administration took the action out of concern that Turkey’s purchase of the Russian anti-aircraft system would end up giving Nato’s main adversary a window into the alliance’s capabilities.

    ‘Highly opinionated’

    Trump, who was wearing a badge of a gold fighter jet on the lapel of his suit jacket, confirmed that they would discuss Turkey’s push to end the long-running rift over buying more US aircraft.

    “He wants the F-35 and he’s wanted that, and we’re talking about that very seriously,” Trump said, adding that Turkey also wanted to buy more of the older F-16 jets and “you’ll know about that by the end of the day”.

    Trump, known for his admiration for forceful foreign leaders, has long shown a fondness for Erdogan and is embracing him despite a crackdown in Turkey on the opposition. His warm welcome also came despite the fact that Erdogan is at odds with key US ally Israel on Gaza and Syria.

    “This is a guy who’s highly opinionated. Usually, I don’t like opinionated people, but I always like this one, but he’s a tough one,” Trump told reporters.

    “He knows about rigged elections better than anybody,” Trump added about his counterpart, after saying that they had stayed friends even while the Republican was out of office due to what he called a “rigged election”.

    Continue Reading

  • Four takeaways from Trump’s Washington meeting with Turkiye’s Erdogan | Politics News

    Four takeaways from Trump’s Washington meeting with Turkiye’s Erdogan | Politics News

    United States President Donald Trump has hosted his Turkish counterpart, Recep Tayyip Erdogan, at the White House for the first time since 2019.

    In a brief Oval Office news conference on Thursday, the two leaders gave reporters a preview of the issues they would discuss behind closed doors, including the sale of military equipment, trade and global conflicts.

    Recommended Stories

    list of 3 itemsend of list

    “ He’s a highly respected man. He’s respected very much in his country and all throughout Europe and throughout the world where they know him,” Trump said, gesturing to Erdogan. “It’s an honour to have him.”

    While Trump has maintained friendly relations with Erdogan during his second term, the ties between their two countries have faced strain in recent years, particularly as a result of Turkiye’s continued trade with Russia.

    Still, both leaders sought to cast their relationship in a positive light at Thursday’s meeting, which was followed by a joint lunch.

    “We’ve had a very good relationship for a long time,” Trump said, adding, “ This is a tough man. This is a guy who’s highly opinionated. Usually, I don’t like opinionated people, but I always like this one.”

    Erdogan, for his part, said that he was “very pleased” to be returning to the White House and hoped to carry Turkiye-US relations to “a much different level”.

    Here are some of the key issues the pair addressed in their wide-ranging news conference:

    ‘Close to a deal’ on Gaza

    Thursday’s Oval Office meeting comes days after both Erdogan and Trump spoke at the United Nations General Assembly, where several world leaders pushed for recognition of Palestinian statehood.

    Trump himself met Arab and Muslim leaders on the sidelines of the assembly.

    Though few details have emerged about the sideline meeting, Trump officials reportedly presented their proposal to bring Israel’s war on Gaza to an end.

    That war has killed at least 65,502 Palestinians and wounded 167,376 more since its start in October 2023. An independent UN commission earlier this month accused Israel of committing the crime of genocide in the territory.

    On Thursday, when asked about this week’s negotiations, Trump reiterated that he had had “a very great meeting with the representatives of the most powerful countries in the Middle East”. He added that the US was “close to a deal” to end the war.

    “I think we can get that one done,” Trump said. “I hope we can get it done. A lot of people are dying, but we want the hostages back.”

    Trump stressed that the return of the Israeli captives held in Gaza — both the living and the bodies of the deceased — was a necessary condition to achieving a ceasefire.

    The next step, he explained, was to speak with Israeli Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu and stress that all parties involved want the war to end.

    “I believe in the peace efforts Mr Trump is leading,” Erdogan added.

    The Turkish leader had been among the participants in the meeting, along with representatives from Qatar, Egypt, Indonesia, Jordan, Pakistan, Saudi Arabia and the United Arab Emirates.

    Trump tells Putin ‘time to stop’ in Ukraine

    Trump has also repeatedly pledged to end Russia’s invasion of Ukraine, which began in February 2022 and has resulted in a slow-grinding war.

    But in short remarks on Thursday addressing the war, Trump briefly needled Erdogan for his country’s continued trade with Russia.

    “I’d like to have him stop buying any oil from Russia while Russia continues this rampage against Ukraine,” Trump said.

    Earlier this week, Trump made headlines when he posted on social media that he believes Ukraine can win back all of the territory Russia has captured since the invasion began.

    It was a sudden about-face for the US president, whose administration has long maintained that Ukraine would have to cede occupied territory in order to achieve peace.

    At Thursday’s news conference, Trump also chastised Russian President Vladimir Putin for continuing the war in Ukraine, calling it “such a waste of human life.”

    “ Russia’s spent millions and millions of dollars in bombs, missiles, ammunition and lives — their lives. And they’ve gained virtually no land,” Trump said. “I think it’s time to stop, I really do.”

    Trade deals and sanctions

    One of the most anticipated elements of Thursday’s meeting was the prospect that the US could resume trading military aircraft with Turkiye.

    In 2019, during Trump’s first term as president, the US removed Turkiye from a programme that saw Washington sell sophisticated F-35 fighter jets to allies.

    The US expressed fears at the time that Turkiye’s use of Russian technology could result in the collection of US military data.

    But on Thursday, Trump hinted he may lift sanctions against the sale of such aircraft to Turkiye if his meeting with Erdogan went well.

    “I know he wants the F-35, and he’s wanted that,” Trump said of Erdogan. “And we’re talking about that very seriously.”

    The pair also planned to discuss the transfer of F-16 fighter jets. The US had approved the sale of the F-16s to Turkiye in January 2024 after the Turkish parliament ratified Sweden’s NATO membership.

    When asked whether he was willing to make a deal to sell F-35s as well, Trump said of Erdogan, “I think he’ll be successful in buying the things that he wants to buy.”

    Trump also said he could lift sanctions against Turkiye’s defence industries “very soon”, adding: “If we have a good meeting, almost immediately.”

    ‘Major announcement’ coming on Syria

    At Thursday’s news conference, Trump took time to praise Erdogan, as well, for his government’s efforts in war-torn Syria.

    He also teased that he would make a “major announcement” later in the day about Syria, but did not elaborate.

    Syria had faced a nearly 14-year-long civil war until last December, when a rebel offensive toppled the government of former President Bashar al-Assad.

    Since the fall of al-Assad’s government, the Trump administration has begun to lift sanctions against Syria that were designed to address human rights abuses under the former president.

    At Thursday’s meeting, Trump credited Erdogan with paving the way for the sanctions relief in Syria. He also praised Erdogan for his role in al-Assad’s removal.

    “ I think President Erdogan is the one responsible for Syria, for the successful fight in ridding Syria of its past leader,” Trump said. “ I think this man is responsible. He doesn’t take the responsibility, but it’s actually a great achievement.”

    Trump added, “I took sanctions off in order to let them breathe, because those sanctions were very strong.”

    Al Jazeera correspondent Kimberly Halkett described Thursday’s meeting as “really about optics for the Turkish leader”, noting that Erdogan had been frozen out of Washington for the last four years and is now taking something of a victory lap.

    Continue Reading

  • Global Centre for Pluralism announces 2025 Global Pluralism Award finalists

    Global Centre for Pluralism announces 2025 Global Pluralism Award finalists

    Ottawa, Canada, 25 September 2025 – The Global Centre for Pluralism announces today the ten laureates for the 2025 Global Pluralism Award. These leaders are being recognised for their exceptional and courageous work to support full participation by marginalised groups in their societies, build trust and cooperation between warring parties, and create systems that foster the protection and celebration of differences around the world.

    Selected from over 300 applications across 64 countries, the 2025 finalists are operating in some of the world’s most challenging contexts. From active war zones to communities facing extreme discrimination, they champion a more peaceful and equitable world and provide examples of how it is possible to make practical changes that foster pluralistic societies.

    The 2025 Global Pluralism Award finalists are:

    • A Land for All (Israel and Palestine): An Israeli-Palestinian movement promoting a visionary future where two states exist within a shared homeland, prioritising reconciliation and a shared belonging despite current polarisation.
    • Artistic Freedom Initiative (USA): Provides critical legal and resettlement services to persecuted artists from over 60 countries, preserving cultural memories, languages and identities despite repression in their home countries.
    • Cesta von (Slovakia): Empowers the Roma community to find a way out of systemic poverty to participate more fully in their broader society.
    • Colombia Diversa (Colombia): Advances justice and inclusion for LGBTIQ+ people through strategic litigation and unprecedented dialogue with oppositional groups, including evangelical leaders and former combatants.
    • Coordinadora Nacional de Mujeres Indígenas – CONAMI (Mexico): A network of Indigenous women increasing indigenous women’s participation in decision-making in Mexico and tackling gender-based violence and land rights by centring traditional knowledge in national activism.
    • Mais Diferenças (Brazil): Unites Brazilians with and without disabilities to co-create tools that enable all students to experience meaningful learning together.
    • New Life Trust Organization (Afghanistan): Fosters women’s entrepreneurship and inter-ethnic solidarity through skills training and artistic expression in one of the world’s most challenging contexts for gender equality.
    • Nonviolent Peaceforce (International): Undertakes peacebuilding activities that build trust among all parties to conflict in countries from Ukraine to South Sudan, centring the voices of those on the peripheries to participate in building solutions.
    • Southern Africa Litigation Centre (Regional): Supports marginalised populations across 12 African countries through landmark litigation to overcome systemic barriers to full legal, social, and environmental participation.
    • Sudanese Youth Network for Ending the War and Establishing a Democratic Civil Transformation (Regional): Unites diverse Sudanese youth within Sudan and across six other countries around a common vision to end the war and transition to a civilian government.

    “The Global Pluralism Award seeks out the world’s most powerful examples of pluralism in action. This year, we are proud to welcome 10 new exemplary leaders into our now 50-strong community of award alumni,” said Meredith Preston McGhie, Secretary-General of the Global Centre for Pluralism. “This is more than a network; it is a dynamic and growing global community of practice with lessons for all of us. These leaders are on the front lines and provide vital lessons about what is possible around the world. Together, they prove that pluralism is not just an ideal, but a practical solution to the world’s most pressing challenges.”

    Dr Marwan Muasher, Chair of the Global Pluralism Award jury, points out that the Award plays a role in building solidarity. “People who work on pluralism need to be recognised and acknowledged around the globe; the Award does a lot in raising awareness about the need for pluralism. It is important for this global community of practitioners to know about each other and their successes in different contexts.”

    About the Global Pluralism Award

    The Global Pluralism Award recognises pluralism in action. Presented every other year to individuals, organisations, governments and businesses from around the world, the Award celebrates the inspiring and brave work that is helping to build more inclusive societies where diversity is valued and protected.

    The Award is conferred by the Global Centre for Pluralism, an independent, charitable organisation founded by His Highness the Aga Khan and the Government of Canada, and is made possible in part by the generous support of TD Bank Group. For more information about the Award, visit Global Pluralism Award.

    Continue Reading

  • Drone attacks leave Denmark exposed

    Drone attacks leave Denmark exposed

    Paul KirbyEurope digital editor

    BO AMSTRUP/Ritzau Scanpix/AFP Passengers walked in front of the terminal in AalborgBO AMSTRUP/Ritzau Scanpix/AFP

    Aalborg airport was among those targeted by a wave of drones in Denmark

    A night of drone incidents at airports and military bases all over Jutland, western Denmark, has not caused any harm or damage – and yet it has exposed the country’s defences as vulnerable to attack.

    In an era of hybrid warfare, there is a sense of embarrassment in Denmark – a founding member of the North Atlantic Treaty Organization (Nato) alliance – that its critical infrastructure has become so vulnerable.

    Aalborg and Billund airports had to close, while drones were spotted at Esbjerg, Sonderborg and Skrydstrup. Aalborg also serves as a military base and Skrydstrup is home to some of the air force’s F-35 and F-16 war planes. Drones were also seen over the Jutland Dragoon regiment at Holstebro.

    There have since been reports of police investigating drone activities around Denmark’s oil and gas platforms in the North Sea, and near the central port of Korsor.

    The question now facing the country’s military is how to respond.

    None of the drones have been shot down – defence chiefs decided it was safer not to, but that is not a long-term solution.

    Denmark is, of course, not alone.

    Norway, Estonia, Poland, Bulgaria and Romania have all been subjected to hybrid warfare in recent weeks. All are on Nato’s eastern flank.

    Estonia and Poland have both invoked Nato’s Article 4 this month after Russian war planes entered Estonian air space for 12 minutes, and about 20 Russian drones violated Polish airspace and were shot down.

    Denmark has said a “professional actor” was responsible for the drone attacks it saw, and left it at that.

    Article 4 brings the defensive alliance together for consultation when a member’s “territorial integrity, political independence or security… is threatened”.

    The Danish government is currently assessing whether to invoke it too.

    Map of Denmark showing airports in Jutland

    This is a serious moment for Denmark, and its top brass – government, defence and police – quickly called a press conference where Defence Minister Troels Lund Poulsen said it looked “systematic”, because of the number of locations targeted.

    “This is what I would define as a hybrid attack,” he said, without attributing blame as they have no concrete evidence.

    Russia has not been ruled out – something Prime Minister Mette Frederiksen made clear after Monday night’s drone disruption over Copenhagen.

    Moscow “firmly rejects” any involvement and its embassy in Copenhagen has denounced the incidents as “staged provocation”.

    However, Frederiksen is in no doubt about the risk and said only last week that Russia “will be a threat to Europe and Denmark for years to come”.

    Nobody has yet come to any harm, primarily because the drones were left to fly their course.

    Defence chief Michael Hyldgaard put it simply: “When you shoot something down in the air, something also comes down again.”

    An example of that was when the roof of a house was destroyed in Wyryki, eastern Poland, reportedly by a missile fired by a Nato jet.

    Police in Jutland did say they would try to bring down the drones if it could be done safely, and the military has made clear it is prepared to do so over military installations, dependent on “the specific threat assessment and possible consequences of the takedown”.

    But it has not happened so far.

    Watch: Object seen flying away from Aalborg airport as drones disrupt flights

    Kjeld Jensen, from the drone centre at the University of South Denmark, accepts it is embarrassing that Denmark’s vulnerabilities have been laid bare – but he believes the police and military acted appropriately.

    “I wouldn’t shoot down the drones if they are over an urban area or an airport,” he says, “as they have to come down, and there’d be other fuel or batteries creating a fire, which is also a risk you have to take into account.”

    “You need to decide whether it’s more dangerous than letting it fly around,” says Peter Viggo Jakobsen, of the Royal Danish Defence College. “But it’s not a sustainable situation and we need to come up with ideas.”

    Denmark’s cautious approach is markedly different from Poland’s since Russia’s drone incursions there on 10 September.

    This week, Polish Foreign Minister Radek Sikorski warned Moscow at the UN: “If another missile or plane crosses our territory without permission, intentionally or by accident, and is shot down and its wreckage falls on Nato territory, do not come here to complain. You have been warned.”

    What Denmark and many of its neighbours lack is the kind of tools they need to bring down the drones.

    The government recently announced plans for an “integrated layered air defence”, along with investment in long-range precision weapons to hit enemy territory.

    But that’s of little use for Denmark’s defences right now.

    “From an engineering perspective it’s so much easier to build a drone that can fly than to build something that can keep them from flying,” Jensen, from the University of South Denmark, points out.

    On Friday, Denmark will join several Nato allies and Ukraine to discuss the idea of erecting a “drone wall”, proposed by European Commission President Ursula von der Leyen, to protect the EU’s eastern borders.

    The drones they will be discussing are more likely to focus on the kind of armed weapons that reached Polish airspace rather than the unarmed drones with bright lights seen over Denmark.

    The aim is to create an early detection system, although again that may not have helped Denmark overnight if drones spotted over Jutland were launched locally.

    If Russia was behind the latest drone disruption, despite its denials, then by the standards of hybrid warfare this operation appears to have been a success.

    Airports were briefly closed, Denmark’s military sites were made to look vulnerable, and senior ministers were forced to give a rushed press conference to allay public concerns.

    But it has given Danes a new wake-up call. Police have raised their crisis level and the defence minister has spoken of the country facing a new reality.

    Continue Reading

  • From former president to future prisoner: Sarkozy’s conviction divides France

    From former president to future prisoner: Sarkozy’s conviction divides France

    Hugh SchofieldParis correspondent

    AFP via Getty Images Former President of France Nicolas Sarkozy looks off to the left of the frame. He is positioned in the far right. He is wearing a dark suit, white shirt and dark blue tie. His expression is slightly morose. The background is blurry and not quite clear. AFP via Getty Images

    Former leader of France, Nicolas Sarkozy, has been sentenced to five years in prison

    Nicolas Sarkozy is back where he used to be – dominating the news and dividing the nation.

    Thirteen years after he left office, he is about to become the first former French president to be sent to prison after getting a five-year term for criminal conspiracy.

    And the circumstances are full of the same sulphurous contention that used once to mark his every move.

    Fresh from his sentencing in the “Libyan money” trial on Thursday, he spoke with incandescent rage about the “limitless hatred” of which he said he was still a victim.

    From the moment he emerged as a champion of the right, Sarkozy was convinced he had been the target of a left-wing cabal within the French judiciary and media.

    And with this sentence – he thinks – has come more incontrovertible proof.

    Why, his supporters are asking, did the court clear him of three of the four charges weighing against him: illegal party funding, embezzlement of Libyan funds, and corruption?

    Why did the court only convict him of the last charge – the “catch-all” one of “criminal association” (often thrown at drugs gang members when investigators have nothing else to go on)?

    And why – having convicted him on this lesser charge – did the court then give him such a humiliating and draconian punishment? Not only did they send a 70 year-old man to five years in jail, it was a shocking 20 years after the offence.

    They also stipulated that the sentence was not “suspensive” – in other words they said he would go to jail even if he lodged an appeal, even though in French law pending an appeal he is in theory still innocent.

    Just when you thought the old passions for and against the man were beginning to fade, suddenly they are back with a vengeance.

    Many will feel some sympathy with Sarkozy – not necessarily that he is entirely guiltless in this matter of seeking Libyan campaign money.

    AFP via Getty Image Former President of France Nicolas Sarkozy stands walks as he is flanked by two men, in front and behind him. The two men in front of him is wearing police attire. The two men behind him are wearing matching black suits, white shirts and black ties. The one closest to him is wearing glasses as well. Sarkozy is wearing a black suit with grey pinstripes, paired with a white shirt and black tie. AFP via Getty Image

    But they will see some truth in his claims of victimisation: that there are indeed some in the Paris “politico-mediatic-judicial” establishment who loathe the former president and rejoice in bringing him down.

    Look through another lens, though, and Sarkozy is not some hard-done-by ex-head of state, but an egotistical and highly influential political operator who has consistently pushed the law to its limits in order to get his way.

    Why else would there be such a litany of lawsuits against him? Why else would Sarkozy already have been convicted on two other charges of corruption – once for trying to suborn a judge, and another time for illegal campaign funding?

    And if the court has now decided to throw the book at him in the Libya affair, maybe it is because the charge of trying to elicit election funds from a foreign dictator is actually a rather serious one.

    It is all relevant today because even though Sarkozy is no longer the influential figure that some make him out to be, the arguments about this case echo through the hall of ruins that are French politics.

    The right and far-right take up his cause, crying foul about left-wing judicial over-reach. Marine Le Pen – herself banned from running for the presidency because of a “no-suspension” clause in her own conviction early this year – was first to denounce the “injustice”.

    And the left sees it all as more evidence of rich men’s privilege – the powerful getting more powerful by blithely ignoring the law.

    Nicolas Sarkozy has long since left office, and there is no prospect of his returning. He is a figure of the past. But his case lays bare the divisions in a very divided country.

    Continue Reading

  • Abbas rejects Hamas attack, urges world to recognise Palestinian statehood – UN News

    1. Abbas rejects Hamas attack, urges world to recognise Palestinian statehood  UN News
    2. A surprise from China and a warning from Ukraine: The key takeaways from UNGA day two  Australian Broadcasting Corporation
    3. Israel is guilty of war crimes, Palestine’s Abbas tells UN General Assembly  Al Jazeera
    4. Palestinian President Abbas affirms readiness to work with Trump and others to implement Gaza peace plan  Dawn
    5. Palestinian president says ready to work with Trump for two-state peace plan  BBC

    Continue Reading

  • Canada, UK face backlash over changing embassy addresses to ‘Palestine’

    Canada, UK face backlash over changing embassy addresses to ‘Palestine’

    The websites of both the UK and Canadian embassies in Israel have come under criticism after references to “Palestine” were added to their addresses.

    Global Affairs Canada updated its site to describe its Tel Aviv embassy as being located in “Palestine”, according to the Toronto Sun. The page initially listed “Israel and Palestine” before later being corrected.

    The UK Foreign Office faced similar scrutiny after the website of its Consulate General in Jerusalem added “Palestine” at the bottom of the address. The location had previously been described as “East Jerusalem”.

    Read More: Muslim leaders reject Gaza displacement

    The changes quickly spread across social media, drawing thousands of views and comments.
    “This is nuts, and of note, they’re doing it all on Rosh HaShanah when a large portion of the Jewish community is offline,” wrote X user Dan Levy.

    In Canada, Liberal MP Anthony Housefather said he had contacted Global Affairs, and a correction was made “a few hours later”.

    In the UK, Alex Hearn, director of Labour Against Antisemitism, said: “The UK government erased Israel’s capital even on the Jewish new year.”

    Also Read: US allies’ support for Palestinian statehood puts Trump’s Israel policy to test

    France has also faced criticism after changing the address of its consulate in West Jerusalem to list “Palestine”.

    Canada’s Tel Aviv embassy was briefly listed as “Tel Aviv, Israel, Palestine”. Hearn described this as “geographically incoherent”, adding: “This geographically incoherent address is a political statement, showing they have decided all of Israel is Palestine ‘from the river to the sea’.”

    Continue Reading

  • Palestinian president warns against plans for ‘Greater Israel’

    Palestinian president warns against plans for ‘Greater Israel’

    LONDON: Palestinian Authority President Mahmoud Abbas called for an end to the war in Gaza and condemned Israel’s “expansionary plans,” in a virtual address to the UN General Assembly on Thursday.

    He demanded “intervention” to stop Israel’s war in Gaza and settler violence in the West Bank, warning that plans for a “Greater Israel” would encroach upon the territory of other Arab states.

    Gaza is “a war of genocide, destruction, starvation, and displacement,” Abbas said, adding that more than 220,000 Palestinians — the majority of them women, children and the elderly — have been killed or injured in the enclave since October 2023.

    He accused Israel of starving more than 2 million people, and of destroying 80 percent of Gaza’s buildings.

    “What Israel is carrying out isn’t merely an aggression. It’s a war crime and a crime against humanity that’s both documented and monitored,” he said.

    “And it will be recorded in history books and the pages of international conscience as one of the most horrific chapters of humanitarian tragedy in the 20th and 21st centuries.”

    Abbas said Israel’s settlement plans in the West Bank, including the E1 project, would make a two-state solution unviable and contravene international law and several UN Security Council resolutions. 

    He noted the unchecked, violent behavior of settlers in the West Bank, saying: “They burn homes and fields. They uproot trees and attack villages, and attack unarmed Palestinian civilians. In fact, they kill them in broad daylight under the protection of the Israeli occupation army.”

    Abbas cited recent remarks by Israeli Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu about a “Greater Israel,” and the recent Israeli strikes in Qatar, as reasons for concern for the broader Arab world, calling them “an escalation that’s a grave and a blatant violation of international law, which requires a decisive intervention and deterring procedures and measures.”

    He was equally unequivocal in condemning the Hamas attack on Israel of Oct. 7, 2023, demanding the immediate release of all remaining hostages in Gaza and the disarming of the group.

    “These actions don’t represent the Palestinian people, nor do they represent their just struggle for freedom and independence,” he said.

    “We’ve affirmed, and will continue to affirm, that the Gaza Strip is an integral part of the state of Palestine, and that we’re ready to bear full responsibility for governance and security there. 

    “Hamas won’t have a role to play in governance. Hamas and the other factions will have to hand over their weapons to the Palestinian Authority as part of a process to build the institutions of one state, one law and one legal security forces. We reiterate that we don’t want an armed state.”

    Abbas added that though the Palestinian people “are still living the tragedies of the Israeli aggression and occupation,” progress is being made on an independent Palestinian state following high-level diplomatic efforts led by Saudi Arabia and France at a meeting on Sept. 22. 

    He thanked the two countries for their efforts, as well as a raft of other governments that have recently recognized Palestinian statehood or announced plans to do so, including the UK, Canada, Australia, Belgium, Portugal and others. “Our people won’t forget this noble position,” Abbas said.

    “We highly appreciate all the peoples and organizations around the world who protested in support of the rights of the Palestinian people to freedom and independence, and to stop the war, destruction and starvation,” he said.

    “We reject confusing the solidarity with the Palestinian cause and the issue of antisemitism, which is something that we reject based on our values and principles.”

    Abbas reaffirmed the need for aid to be allowed to flow freely into Gaza through the UN, an end to the Israeli occupation of Palestinian lands, the release of prisoners on both sides, and an end to aggression at religious sites.

    He said it is essential that the people of Gaza not be displaced from their land, that Israel release confiscated taxes to help in the reconstruction of the Occupied Territories, and called for support for the PA to hold nationwide elections within a year of the end of hostilities.

    “We want a modern and democratic state that abides by international law, the rule of law and multilateralism, and the peaceful transition of power,” he added.

    “We declare that we’re ready to work with US President Donald Trump, and with the Kingdom of Saudi Arabia and France, the UN, and all partners to implement the peace plan that was approved in the conference that was held on Sept. 22.”

    Abbas said: “Peace can’t be achieved if justice isn’t achieved, and there can be no justice if Palestine isn’t freed.

    “We want to live in freedom, security and peace — like all other people on Earth — in an independent sovereign state on the borders of 1967 with East Jerusalem as our capital, in security and peace with our neighbors.

    “We want a modern civilian state that’s free of violence, weapons and extremism, one that respects law, human rights and invests in people, development, technology and education, not in wars and conflict.”

    He added: “Palestine is ours. Jerusalem is the jewel of our heart and our eternal capital. We won’t leave our homeland. We won’t leave our lands. Our people will remain rooted like the olive trees, firm as the rocks.

    “We’ll rise from under the rubble to rebuild, and to send from our blessed and holy land the messages of hope and the sound of truth and right, and build the bridges of a just peace for the people of our region and the entire world.”

    Continue Reading