CAPTAIN AMERICA (2025) by Chip Zdarsky and Valerio Schiti returns to the early moments when Steve Rogers emerged from the ice after World War II. The first arc in the acclaimed series explores the man out of time’s first foray into the ironclad clutches of Doctor Doom.
In CAPTAIN AMERICA #4, our titular hero and the Latverian monarch will come to a head. The preview for the upcoming issue sees the two powerful figures caught in a brawl, with Doctor Doom wielding his mystical might against Cap’s shield. It’s the first battle between Captain America and Doctor Doom, with only the fate of Latveria hanging in the balance. How will this historic battle between two titans shape the future of the Marvel Universe? The past will catch up with the present in the recently announced CAPTAIN AMERICA #6 and THE WILL OF DOOM #1, each dealing with the fallout and aftermath of ONE WORLD UNDER DOOM.
“Between THE WILL OF DOOM and CAPTAIN AMERICA, we’re charting a new course for the Marvel Universe with one simple statement: Doom always has a plan,” teased series writer Chip Zdarsky.
Witness Captain America’s first battle against Doctor Doom in the preview below!
Slim phones are making a comeback, and the world’s top two makers are here to battle it out. The newly announced iPhone Air is set to compete with Samsung’s Galaxy S25 Edge, so we’ve rounded up a quick specs comparison between the two.
Table of Contents:
You can compare the complete specs sheets or go through the rundown below.
Size comparison
The iPhone Air is 2 grams heavier than the S25 Edge, but it’s also 0.2mm thinner. Honestly, we doubt anyone will be able to tell the difference, so we can safely give this category a tie. Both phones feature titanium frames, with the one on the iPhone going for a shiny look while the Galaxy’s has a matte finish.
Apple iPhone Air
Light Gold
Cloud White
Space Black
Sky Blue
Samsung Galaxy S25 Edge
Titanium Icyblue
Titanium Silver
Titanium Jetblack
While we’ve yet to handle the iPhone Air in hand, it does feature rounded corners, which give out the illusion of being even slimmer. At the same time, its camera visor (or plateau as Apple calls it) appears to be more pronounced than the more compact camera island on the S25 Edge.
Display comparison
Samsung’s thin and light phone features a larger 6.7” display with higher pixel density (513ppi) and a smaller front-facing camera cutout. Both panels feature 120 Hz refresh rates and HDR10 support. The iPhone is rated at a higher peak brightness of 3000 nits, compared to 2600 nits on the Galaxy S25 Edge, even though we measured 1,416 nits during our review. We’ll have to test the Air’s brightness output once we get our unit.
iPhone Air features Ceramic Shield 2 vs. Corning Gorilla Glass Ceramic 2 on the S25 Edge. We expect both to fare equally in terms of scratch resistance. Elsewhere, the iPhone does feature an anti-reflective coating while the Galaxy does not.
Performance
Apple iPhone Air
Apple A19 Pro 3 nm
256GB 12GB RAM base config
1TB 12GB RAM top-tier config
The A19 Pro is the world’s fastest smartphone chipset according to Apple, but we don’t have any real benchmarks to work with for now. The Galaxy runs on Qualcomm’s flagship Snapdragon 8 Gen Elite for Galaxy, which is the current best of the best on the Android side.
The Galaxy gets the added benefit of a vapor chamber for heat dissipation, which is quite important for a slim device. It will be interesting to see how the iPhone performs under load since it does not get any advanced heat dissipation tech. Both phones come with 12 GB RAM and 256 GB base storage, but the iPhone is upgradeable up to 1 TB, while the Galaxy can only go up to 512 GB.
Camera comparison
Apple iPhone Air
48 MP main camera 1/1.56″ sensor
18 MP selfie camera f/1.9 (wide)
4K@24/25/30/60fps Main and selfie camera video
Samsung Galaxy S25 Edge
200 MP main camera 1/1.3″ sensor
12 MP ultrawide camera 1/2.55″ sensor
12 MP selfie camera f/2.2 (wide)
8K@30fps, 4K@30/60/120fps Main camera video
When it comes to cameras, the Galaxy S25 Edge is the clear winner. Not only does it feature a 200 MP main camera with a larger sensor, but it also has a 12 MP ultrawide lens. The Galaxy records up to 8K video or 4K 120fps, whereas the iPhone tops out at 4K 60fps.
The iPhone features a higher-resolution 18 MP front-facing camera, with a square sensor and wider viewfinder that allows you to take horizontal photos even when holding the phone in landscape mode.
Battery and charging
Apple iPhone Air
3149 mAh
Wired charging 20W (50% in 30 min)
Wireless charging 20W wireless MagSafe/Qi2
Samsung managed to fit 23% more battery capacity in the S25 Edge while also delivering faster 25W wired charging (55% in 30 minutes). Battery capacity is arguably the biggest pain point of these thin and light devices, and the larger cell on the Galaxy gets it a nod over the iPhone. Apple, however, offers slightly faster 20W wireless charging speeds compared to Samsung’s 15W.
Verdict
Rounding out the specs comparison, both phones support Wi-Fi 7 and UWB connectivity, though the iPhone gets the newer second-gen UWB and is also outfitted with the more recent Bluetooth 6.0 vs Bluetooth 5.4 on the Galaxy.
On the other hand, Galaxy S25 Edge brings a USB Type-C 3.2 port while the iPhone is limited to a USB Type-C 2.0 connector. Samsung also managed to fit stereo speakers on the S25 Edge, while the iPhone Air gets a single one on top. The Galaxy also retains the physical SIM slot while the iPhone is eSIM-only.
Apple iPhone Air • Samsung Galaxy S25 Edge
Last but certainly not least – pricing. The Galaxy S25 Edge is currently available for around $840/€725, whereas the iPhone Air starts at $1,000/€1,200. That’s a hefty difference, which certainly tips things in favor of the Galaxy. But we’ll have to wait and see how the iPhone Air performs in our tests to give you a final verdict.
Samsung Galaxy S25 Edge
In the meantime, we’d like to hear your thoughts – did Apple or Samsung make the better slim phone?
MANCHESTER, England (AP) — Phil Salt’s fastest and highest Twenty20 hundred for England launched the third biggest ever men’s total and a smashing 146-run win over South Africa on Friday.
Salt’s 141 not out and Jos Buttler’s 83 propped up England’s 304-2, which included 18 sixes and 30 boundaries.
Advertisement
South Africa followed with resolve but was 64-3 after the powerplay and lost captain Aiden Markram for a team-high 41 off 20 in the eighth over when the result became inevitable. The Proteas were all out for 158 in the 17th over.
It was their heaviest T20 loss by runs and England’s biggest win by runs.
“That was really good fun,” Salt told broadcaster Sky Sports. “A personal milestone but the fact we got 300 and won by such a big margin, I can’t have asked for much more.”
The three-match series goes to a tiebreaker on Sunday in Nottingham.
“With the batting lineup we have got there are not many heights we can’t reach,” England captain Harry Brook said. “Every must-win game we have now leading to the T20 World Cup (in February) is awesome preparation for us.”
Advertisement
The Proteas chose to bowl first in hope of using the moisture in the air, but all they caught was lightning from openers Salt and Buttler at their club ground, Old Trafford.
Salt clobbered the game’s first three deliveries to the boundary off Marco Jansen but was soon overtaken by Buttler.
A fourth consecutive boundary brought up Buttler’s 50 in 18 balls, the third fastest half-century for England.
He and Salt crashed 100 in the powerplay with a ball to spare, only the third time that’s been done in a men’s T20.
Buttler was on 83 from 30 balls and had Liam Livingstone’s fastest England T20 century in 40 balls in his grasp. Then he hit straight to the fielder at deep square leg at 126-1 in the eighth over and Old Trafford rose to applaud.
Advertisement
Salt reached his 50 in 19 balls, one more ball than Buttler.
But Salt broke Livingstone’s fastest record by one in 39 balls and the crowd was back on its feet. The century was Salt’s fourth for England. No other Englishman has more than one, and only Glenn Maxwell and Rohit Sharma (five each) have more T20 hundreds.
Salt’s hundred came in a 23-run over bowled by Kagiso Rabada, who overstepped twice and bowled wide twice.
Salt passed his and England’s highest T20 score of 119 from December 2023, and survived being out caught on 126 because Kwena Maphaka stepped on the rope at long-on, giving up Salt’s sixth six.
Advertisement
England arrived at the last over needing 16 runs to break 300 and ultimately got there thanks to another no ball by Rabada. His 70 runs conceded were the most by a South African in men’s T20s.
The only higher totals were Zimbabwe’s 344-4 against Gambia in 2024 and Nepal’s 314-3 versus Mongolia in 2023. England eclipsed the best total by an ICC full member, India’s 297-6 versus Bangladesh in 2024.
Salt finished unbeaten on 141 from 60 balls, with eight sixes and 15 boundaries. Brook was with him on 41 off 21.
The bowlers then feasted on the pressure on South Africa and Jofra Archer took 3-25, Sam Curran 2-11, and Will Jacks two at the death.
LONDON — The Netherlands added itself Friday to a number of countries pressuring organizers of the Eurovision Song Contest to drop Israel from the contest because of its war in the Gaza Strip.
Dutch broadcaster AVROTROS, one of dozens of public broadcasters that collectively fund and broadcast the contest, said it would not take part in next year’s competition in Vienna if Israel participates “given the ongoing and severe human suffering in Gaza.”
“The broadcaster also expresses deep concern about the serious erosion of press freedom: the deliberate exclusion of independent international reporting and the many casualties among journalists,” it said in a statement.
Irish broadcaster RTE released a similar statement Thursday, following a path already taken by Slovenia. Iceland said it may withdraw from the contest and Spanish Prime Minister Pedro Sánchez has called for Israel to be booted from the competition.
The boycott threat is part of a pressure campaign by arts organizations and figures to ostracize Israel and press for peace.
Earlier this week, Hollywood stars including Emma Stone, Ayo Edebiri, Ava DuVernay, Olivia Colman, Yorgos Lanthimos, Riz Ahmed, Rob Delaney, Javier Bardem, and Tilda Swinton joined 3,000 other industry figures to sign a pledge to boycott Israeli film institutions — including festivals, broadcasters and production companies — that are “implicated in genocide and apartheid against the Palestinian people,” according to the group Film Workers for Palestine.
Russia was banned from Eurovision after its full-scale invasion of Ukraine in 2022 but Israel has continued to compete the past two years despite disputes over its participation.
Dozens of former participants, including 2024 winner Nemo of Switzerland, have called for Israel to be excluded over its conduct in the war against Hamas in Gaza. Pro-Palestinian and pro-Israel protests took place around this year’s contest in Basel, Switzerland, though on a much smaller scale than the 2024 event in Sweden.
With politics from the war casting a shadow over the contest, Israeli singer Yuval Raphael finished second this year to Austria’s JJ in the exuberant celebration of pop music.
The European Broadcasting Union has given countries until mid-December to decide if they want to participate.
The Dutch broadcaster said it will continue preparing for the contest until it receives a decision from organizers about whether it will include Israel.
Eurovision’s finale is scheduled for May 16 after semi-finals on May 12 and 14, 2026.
A team of researchers from the University of Toronto in Canada has published two checklists for noncardiac radiologists to use when evaluating chest CT exams taken in the emergency department (ED) for potential cardiac conditions.
“The heart is included in all chest imaging and should be systematically evaluated in patients presenting to the emergency department, particularly if a noncardiac cause of the patient’s symptoms is not identified,” noted a team led by Farah Cadour, MD, of the University of Toronto in Ontario, Canada.
Indications for chest CT in the ED are often related to noncardiac conditions such as pulmonary embolism or pneumonia, the group explained. But as the heart is included in all thoracic imaging, and patients with both cardiac and noncardiac diseases can present in similar ways, radiologists reporting emergency thoracic imaging results should be “familiar with cardiac findings that can be identified with nondedicated nonelectrocardiographically gated chest CT,” the team wrote.
ED presentations that could indicate cardiac disease include chest pain, dyspnea, and palpitations, and although only 5% of patients who arrive in the ED with chest pain are diagnosed with acute coronary syndrome, “the implications of missing the diagnosis are substantial,” the authors noted.
Cadour and colleagues outlined six key categories to evaluate on ED chest CT imaging:
The patient’s clinical history, biochemistry, and any cardiac devices or surgery
Pericardium (effusion, mass, thickness, calcification) and epicardial fat
Aortic root, pulmonary arteries, and veins
They also offered an emergency imaging cardiac checklist for both coronary and noncoronary conditions:
Emergency imaging cardiac checklist (findings at emergency medical imaging)
Coronary
Noncoronary
Acute myocardial infarction
Cardiomyopathy
Spontaneous coronary artery dissection
Cardiac masses and thrombus
Anomalous coronary artery origin with malignant course
Epicardial fat necrosis
Vasculitis involving the coronary arteries
Pericarditis
Pericardial tamponade
Endocarditis
Acute myocarditis in a 30-year-old woman who presented to the emergency department with chest pain and an elevated troponin level. (A) Axial intravenous contrast-enhanced chest CT image acquired to rule out a pulmonary embolism shows focal myocardial low attenuation in the left ventricle basal inferolateral wall (arrow), indicating regional myocardial edema. (B) Short-axis 1.5-tesla T2-weighted cardiac MR image acquired 2 days later shows subepicardial hyperintensity (arrow), indicating acute myocardial edema. (C) Short-axis 1.5- tesla late gadolinium-enhanced cardiac MR image shows corresponding subepicardial late gadolinium enhancement (arrow), indicating inflammation. Images and caption courtesy of the RSNA.
Cardiac abnormalities can be identified at nongated, nondedicated chest CT performed in the emergency department, according to the researchers, who urged that “communication of cardiac imaging findings in the emergency department should be guided by clinical urgency.”
“A systematic approach to cardiac imaging in the emergency department should include evaluation of the coronary arteries, cardiac chambers, myocardium, pericardium, pericardial fat, and central vessels, informed by knowledge of the patient’s clinical presentation and the results of other investigations,” they concluded. “Careful assessment of the heart is crucial to identify urgent and nonurgent findings at chest imaging in the emergency department.”
As the Perseverance rover traversed an ancient river valley in Mars’ Jezero Crater back in July 2024, it drilled into the surface and extracted a sample from of a unique, striped rock called Chevaya Falls. The rover’s instruments then analyzed the sample, which is called Sapphire Canyon, and surveyed the surrounding rock.
When scientists started looking into the data, they found two types of iron-rich minerals arranged on the rock in a distinctive, spotted pattern. Both these minerals are associated with life on Earth. One is found around decomposing organic matter on Earth, while the other is produced by certain microbes.
A team of researchers determined in a study published Sept. 10, 2025, that the sample contains a potential biosignature – which could suggest the red planet once hosted microbial life.
These minerals may have formed on the rock when ancient microbes used chemical reactions to produce energy. But chemical reactions not related to life can also produce these minerals under certain conditions.
To learn more, The Conversation U.S. asked Amy J. Williams, an astrobiologist at the University of Florida, about biosignature hunting on Mars and what’s so special about this Sapphire Canyon sample.
What are biosignatures?
A biosignature is any characteristic, element, molecule, substance or feature that serves as evidence for past or present life. It must be something that cannot be produced without life. Some examples include fossils, organic molecules derived from a biological process, or mineral patterns that form only through microbial activity.
There are six types of biosignatures that scientists may find on Mars. The Planetary Society, CC BY
A potential biosignature, which is how the Sapphire Canyon finding is described, is a substance or structure that might have a biological origin but requires more data or further study before scientists can make a conclusion about the absence or presence of life.
How do scientists determine whether something could be a biosignature on Mars?
Biosignatures come in many different flavors – chemical, physical or structural. Some are rather obvious, like a dinosaur fossil on Earth, but most are far more nuanced.
The search for ancient life on Earth partially informs the search for biosignatures on Mars. Researchers rely on subtle clues preserved in the rock record to address questions such as how long ago microbial life arose on Earth. We search for that evidence in environments such as craters and lake beds with high preservation potential, meaning those that are likely to preserve the biosignatures.
Scientists can apply these techniques to the search for life on Mars. That is why Perseverance was sent to Jezero Crater. In the ancient past, the crater hosted a river-fed lake, which on Earth would represent a habitable environment: one where life would want to live if it ever arose.
This crater was an ideal location to search for ancient life preserved in the rock record on Mars. Astrobiologists then search for chemical, textural and mineral patterns that resemble processes influenced by life back on Earth.
What makes this sample unique and interesting?
The Sapphire Canyon sample is unique because Perseverance’s PIXL and SHERLOC instruments revealed distinctive textures that were dubbed “leopard spots.” These spots are concentric reaction fronts – places where chemical and physical reactions occur – enriched in the minerals vivianite, which contains iron phosphate, and greigite, which is made of iron sulfide.
Chevaya Falls, a rock in the Martian Jezero Crater, is speckled with ‘leopard spots,’ which could indicate chemical reactions that may have once supported ancient life. NASA/JPL-Caltech/MSSS
On Earth, vivianite often forms in environments with lots of decaying organic matter, while certain microbes that use sulfate for energy can produce greigite. Compounds in both these minerals are part of a chemical process called redox gradients, which refers to a series of gradual changes over physical space where chemicals can oxidize (lose electrons) or reduce (gain electrons).
One example is leaving your metal bike out in the rain. Over time, the reduced iron (Fe2+) will lose an electron and oxidize to rust (Fe3+). This process can happen nonbiologically, as exposure to water and oxygen drive the chemical changes that take your new bike to a rusty bike – I suggest not leaving it in the rain.
But some oxidation and reduction processes are so slow on their own that the only way they can occur is with living organisms that push the reactions forward. This process is how many microbes, such as bacteria, get the energy to live. Because these two minerals in the Sapphire Canyon sample both occur in redox gradients, scientists predict that microbial life, if it was ever present, could have played a role in the reactions that created these mineral signatures.
Now, scientists are looking into the explanations that wouldn’t require life to form these features on the sample.
Did scientists expect to find a sample like this?
This was a finding that we had hoped for. However, it was somewhat unexpected in this particular location. This sample came from some of the youngest sedimentary rocks the mission has investigated to date. An earlier prediction had assumed signs of ancient life would come from older Martian rock formations.
Finding these features in younger rocks widens the window of time that Mars was potentially habitable and suggests that Mars could have been habitable later in the planet’s history than scientists previously thought, and older rocks might also hold signs of life that are simply harder to detect.
NASA hosted a press conference on Sept. 10, 2025, about the mysterious sample.
What are the next steps to tell whether the sample indicates signs of past life, or whether the signature is from a nonbiological process?
The mineral associations are a potential fingerprint for those redox reactions that can occur when microbes drive the reaction forward – but abiotic processes, such as sustained high temperatures, acidic conditions and binding by organic compounds, could also explain them.
However, the Cheyava Falls rock shows no signs that it’s been exposed to the high heat or acidity usually required for greigite and vivianite to form nonbiologically. Still, the only definitive way to answer this question is to return the sample to Earth, where scientists can use advanced laboratory techniques to distinguish biological from nonbiological origins.
Hedge funds chopped their bullish position on US crude to the lowest on record as the OPEC+ alliance’s latest decision to boost production compounded already-gloomy forecasts that the world is heading toward an oil surplus this year.
Money managers cut their net-long stance on West Texas Intermediate by 14,630 lots to 12,657 lots in the week ended Sept. 29, the lowest in data stretching back to June 2006, according to the Commodity Futures Trading Commission. Meanwhile, net-long bets on Brent crude decreased by the most since June, data from ICE Futures Europe show.