You are free to share this article under the Attribution 4.0 International license.
A new study examines the economic impact of Salmonella Dublin across Danish dairy farms over a 10-year period.
The infectious and multi-resistant cattle disease Salmonella Dublin can be fatal to both humans and animals and causes significant losses for farmers. Although Denmark has attempted to eradicate the disease since 2008, it has not yet succeeded.
The new study points to possible reasons—and the necessary solutions.
While we’ve all heard of salmonella in chickens, salmonella in cows is likely unknown to many. Nevertheless, Salmonella Dublin is a disease that has been present in cattle herds for decades—in Denmark as well as many other countries. And it is on the rise globally.
It causes pneumonia and blood poisoning and kills many thousands of calves and cows every year.
Although Salmonella Dublin infects humans far less frequently than the more regular salmonella, there is every reason to take it seriously: it is significantly more dangerous and kills up to 12% of those who become infected. At the same time, it is often resistant to antibiotics. Infection can occur through contact with animals as well as through unpasteurized dairy products and undercooked meat.
Still, Denmark has not managed to eradicate the disease—despite a national eradication plan launched in 2008, which set out to completely eliminate the disease. Today, the infection rate is estimated to be around 5% of Danish cattle herds, down from 20-25% in 2008.
In contrast, the infection has increased in recent years to about 18% of herds in the United States and as much as 60% in the United Kingdom.
“Salmonella Dublin is not just a serious threat in the barn. Globally, it is a potential public health risk that is likely to grow as antibiotic resistance spreads. This is a bacterium that kills people every year, and it is high time we do more to combat it,” says Dagim Belay, assistant professor at the food and resource economics department at the University of Copenhagen.
“Denmark has made great progress in the fight against this disease—so why have we not yet reached the goal? One possible reason is that farmers may not have a strong enough incentive to fight it. However, our research shows that the consequences are not only a matter of health—there are also hidden financial losses associated with infection,” says Jakob Vesterlund Olsen from the food and resource economics department.
The study shows that Salmonella Dublin leads to increased calf mortality, lower milk yield, higher medication costs, and more veterinary treatments.
“The tricky thing about Salmonella Dublin is that it often flies under the radar. Many herds are infected without visible symptoms, meaning both the disease and the economic losses can develop gradually without being noticed. Infection reduces productivity and weakens the animals year after year—and the financial losses accumulate over time,” says Belay.
Cattle farms with high levels of infection face average additional annual costs of around EUR 11,300 (about $13,307 USD. But even herds with low levels of infection face financial losses. A typical herd of 200 dairy cows with low-level infection incurs extra variable costs of approximately EUR 6,700 (about $7,891 USD) per year.
“Our estimates are conservative. They are based on data from a Danish system that already has a control program—unlike most other countries. If similar estimates were made in the UK or the US, the economic costs would be significantly higher,” says Belay.
The researchers highlight a key problem in how Danish authorities currently monitor Salmonella Dublin. The Danish Veterinary and Food Administration measures the level of antibodies against the bacterium in the farm’s milk tank, and if the antibody level is below a certain threshold, the herd is deemed salmonella-free.
“Threshold-based regulation has been instrumental in helping Denmark substantially reduce the prevalence of Salmonella Dublin to its current low level. But the current threshold is rather arbitrarily set. And our data shows that production losses already occur at infection levels well below that threshold,” says Olsen.
“So, it is also crucial to give farmers stronger incentives to eradicate the problem. For example, by offering subsidies to farmers who invest in prevention, early detection, and control measures, or by introducing a discounted milk price for milk from chronically infected herds,” says Belay.
Finally, the researchers urge authorities to provide targeted information to cattle producers about the hidden costs of Salmonella Dublin and about effective control strategies.
The study appears in the journal Agricultural Economics.
British High Street bank TSB is being sold off by its Spanish-owner to rival Santander in a deal worth up to £2.9bn.
The sale still has to be agreed by Sabadell’s shareholders, but if TSB does change hands, it will be the second time it has been sold in a decade.
Santander declined to comment on whether the TSB brand – which can trace its roots back more than 200 years – will remain.
TSB has 175 branches in the UK while Santander has around 349 banks in Britain, but it has been shutting branches, saying more customers want to do their banking digitally.
Often when we listen to music, we just instinctually enjoy it. Sometimes, though, it’s worth dissecting a song or other composition to figure out how it’s built.
Take the 1953 jazz standard “Satin Doll,” written by Duke Ellington and Billy Strayhorn, whose subtle structure rewards a close listening. As it happens, MIT Professor Emeritus Samuel Jay Keyser, a distinguished linguist and an avid trombonist on the side, has given the song careful scrutiny.
To Keyser, “Satin Doll” is a glittering example of what he calls the “same/except” construction in art. A basic rhyme, like “rent” and “tent,” is another example of this construction, given the shared rhyming sound and the different starting consonants.
In “Satin Doll,” Keyser observes, both the music and words feature a “same/except” structure. For instance, the rhythm of the first two bars of “Satin Doll” is the same as the second two bars, but the pitch goes up a step in bars three and four. An intricate pattern of this prevails throughout the entire body of “Satin Doll,” which Keyser calls “a musical rhyme scheme.”
When lyricist Johnny Mercer wrote words for “Satin Doll,” he matched the musical rhyme scheme. One lyric for the first four bars is, “Cigarette holder / which wigs me / Over her shoulder / she digs me.” Other verses follow the same pattern.
“Both the lyrics and the melody have the same rhyme scheme in their separate mediums, words and music, namely, A-B-A-B,” says Keyser. “That’s how you write lyrics. If you understand the musical rhyme scheme, and write lyrics to match that, you are introducing a whole new level of repetition, one that enhances the experience.”
Now, Keyser has a new book out about repetition in art and its cognitive impact on us, scrutinizing “Satin Doll” along with many other works of music, poetry, painting, and photography. The volume, “Play It Again, Sam: Repetition in the Arts,” is published by the MIT Press. The title is partly a play on Keyser’s name.
Inspired by the Margulis experiment
The genesis of “Play It Again, Sam” dates back several years, when Keyser encountered an experiment conducted by musicologist Elizabeth Margulis, described in her 2014 book, “On Repeat.” Margulis found that when she altered modern atonal compositions to add repetition to them, audiences ranging from ordinary listeners to music theorists preferred these edited versions to the original works.
“The Margulis experiment really caused the ideas to materialize,” Keyser says. He then examined repetition across art forms that featured research on associated cognitive activity, especially music, poetry, and the visual arts. For instance, the brain has distinct locations dedicated to the recognition of faces, places, and bodies. Keyser suggests this is why, prior to the advent of modernism, painting was overwhelmingly mimetic.
Ideally, he suggests, it will be possible to more comprehensively study how our brains process art — to see if encountering repetition triggers an endorphin release, say. For now, Keyser postulates that repetition involves what he calls the 4 Ps: priming, parallelism, prediction, and pleasure. Essentially, hearing or seeing a motif sets the stage for it to be repeated, providing audiences with satisfaction when they discover the repetition.
With remarkable range, Keyser vigorously analyzes how artists deploy repetition and have thought about it, from “Beowulf” to Leonard Bernstein, from Gustave Caillebotte to Italo Calvino. Some artworks do deploy identical repetition of elements, such as the Homeric epics; others use the “same/except” technique.
Keyser is deeply interested in visual art displaying the “same/except” concept, such as Andy Warhol’s famous “Campbell Soup Cans” painting. It features four rows of eight soup cans, which are all the same — except for the kind of soup on each can.
“Discovering this ‘same/except’ repetition in a work of art brings pleasure,” Keyser says.
But why is this? Multiple experimental studies, Keyser notes, suggest that repeated exposure of a subject to an image — such as an infant’s exposure to its mother’s face — helps create a bond of affection. This is the “mere exposure” phenomenon, posited by social psychologist Robert Zajonc, who as Keyser notes in the book, studied in detail “the repetition of an arbitrary stimulus and the mild affection that people eventually have for it.”
This tendency also helps explain why product manufacturers create ads with just the name of their products in ads: Seen often enough, the viewer bonds with the name. However the mechanism connecting repetition with pleasure works, and whatever its original function, Keyser argues that many artists have successfully tapped into it, grasping that audiences like repetition in poetry, painting, and music.
A shadow dog in Albuquerque
In the book, Keyser’s emphasis on repetition generates some distinctive interpretive positions. In one chapter, he digs into Lee Friendlander’s well-known photo, “Albuquerque, New Mexico,” a street scene with a jumble of signs, wires, and buildings, often interpreted in symbolic terms: It’s the American West frontier being submerged under postwar concrete and commerce.
Keyser, however, has a really different view of the Friendlander photo. There is a dog sitting near the middle of it; to the right is the shadow of a street sign. Keyser believes the shadow resembles the dog, and thinks it creates playful repetition in the photo.
“This particular photograph is really two photographs that rhyme,” Keyser says.“They’re the same, except one is the dog and one is the shadow. And that’s why that photograph is pleasurable, because you see that, even if you may not be fully aware of it. Sensing repetition in a work of art brings pleasure.”
“Play It Again, Sam” has received praise from arts practitioners, among others. George Darrah, principal drummer and arranger of the Boston Pops Orchestra, has called the book “extraordinary” in its “demonstration of the ways that poetry, music, painting, and photography engender pleasure in their audiences by exploiting the ability of the brain to detect repetition.” He adds that “Keyser has an uncanny ability to simplify complex ideas so that difficult material is easily understandable.”
In certain ways “Play It Again, Sam” contains the classic intellectual outlook of an MIT linguist. For decades, MIT-linked linguistics research has identified the universal structures of human language, revealing important similarities despite the seemingly wild variation of global languages. And here too, Keyser finds patterns that help organize an apparently boundless world of art. “Play It Again, Sam” is a hunt for structure.
Asked about this, Keyser acknowledges the influence of his longtime field on his current intellectual explorations, while noting that his insights about art are part of a greater investigation into our works and minds.
“I’m bringing a linguistic habit of mind to art,” Keyser says. “But I’m also pointing an analytical lens in the direction of natural predilections of the brain. The idea is to investigate how our aesthetic sense depends on the way the mind works. I’m trying to show how art can exploit the brain’s capacity to produce pleasure from non-art related functions.”
A recent study led by researchers at SapienCE has revealed that ochre—previously considered primarily a symbolic pigment—played a crucial role in the production of sophisticated stone tools by early modern humans in Blombos Cave, South Africa, during the Middle Stone Age (MSA), between 90,000 and 70,000 years ago.
The seven ochre retouchers from the MSA layers of Blombos Cave (BBC). Credit: Velliky et al., Science Advances (2025)
While examining previously excavated artifacts at the SapienCE laboratory in Cape Town, archaeologist Elizabeth Velliky discovered an ochre fragment bearing wear patterns distinct from the typical grinding marks used for pigment production. Intrigued, she presented the artifact to colleagues Francesco d’Errico, Karen van Niekerk, and Christopher Henshilwood. Their examination confirmed the fragment had been deliberately shaped and used in a previously undescribed way. As they continued to sort through more discoveries, further ochre artifacts with the same marks appeared—seven in total—resulting in a reassessment of the use of ochre in early human life.
Published in Science Advances, the study reports the initial direct archaeological evidence that ochre was specifically crafted into retouching tools for lithic implements. Experimental research and replication studies by d’Errico and colleagues revealed that these ochre “retouchers” were used for pressure flaking and direct percussion—advanced methods in shaping stone tools. These methods are highly dexterous and mentally demanding, especially for the production of the Still Bay points: bifacial tools renowned for their symmetry and refined forms.
Notably, the ochre artifacts show signs of rejuvenation, indicating that they were maintained in good condition over time, a characteristic typical of personal or curated tools. “The sophistication of these pressure flakers implies that they were the personal property of expert toolmakers,” d’Errico said. “They may have functioned not only as practical instruments but also as indicators of identity and technical prowess.”
Macro-images of use traces on some artifacts. Credit: Velliky et al., Science Advances (2025)
This discovery contradicts common assumptions that ochre’s primary role in the cultures of ancient people was symbolic—ritual, or body painting. Instead, it speaks to the pigment’s functional versatility. Earlier ethnographic and experimental studies had hinted at ochre’s use in such processes as hide tanning or hafting adhesives, but definitive archaeological evidence had remained elusive—until now.
Henshilwood, director of SapienCE, emphasized the significance of the find: “We now have evidence that ochre was not only a medium for symbolic expression but also a key material in specialized tool production, reflecting a level of technological sophistication previously associated with much later periods.”
Van Niekerk, a co-author and director of the Blombos Cave excavations, commented that this discovery adds another piece of evidence to how early Homo sapiens were behaviorally modern. “This discovery will add another layer to our understanding of the behavioral modernity of early Homo sapiens in southern Africa,” she said.
Publication: Velliky, E. C., d’Errico, F., van Niekerk, K. L., & Henshilwood, C. S. (2025). Unveiling the multifunctional use of ochre in the Middle Stone Age: Specialized ochre retouchers from Blombos Cave. Science Advances, 11(26), eads2797. doi:10.1126/sciadv.ads2797
Since Draper’s last appearance at Wimbledon, he has reached a Grand Slam semi-final at the US Open, won one of the biggest titles on the ATP Tour in Indian Wells and become only the fourth British man to crack the world’s top five.
That means he is widely regarded as the fourth favourite – behind Jannik Sinner, Carlos Alcaraz and Novak Djokovic – at this year’s grass-court major.
A big reason why left-handed Draper can thrive on the slicker surface is his serve.
The power and variety of his opening shot enables him to start points strongly.
When he lands his first serve, it is effective. His first-serve percentage is only the 43rd best on the ATP Tour this year, but he is 14th in terms of points won after it.
Against 38th-ranked Baez, Draper broke in the first game of the match and the strength of his first serve meant the Argentine had little chance of responding.
He landed 78% of his first serves in the first set, winning 86% of those points with the help of four aces.
By the time Baez decided he could not continue, Draper had won 23 of his 25 first-serve points (93%).
“I served well, although I could have been a bit cleaner off the ground,” said Draper.
“After the first 15 minutes, we started getting good control. We did very professionally and very well.”
During cooling break, he made an adjustment to start to pull the game wider.
On Garcia: “That’s what a striker is meant to do.”
On Mbappe: “He will have more training, he will have more days to recover, so we’ll check.”
NOW I’ll bid farewell. Thanks all.
With that, I’ll bid farewell. Enjoy the Real Madrid-Monterrey match after Monterrey’s upset win over Borussia Dortmund this evening. (Look, if Al-Hilal can beat Manchester City …)
Thanks for checking in with us today.
Valverde speaks on goal-scorer Garcia: He moves very well, he’s a player from the academy, he sees an opportunity.
Valverde on his play: I tried to do the best for all my teammates.
The translator then laughed at something that was clearly lost in translation.
Last word from the mailbag: Kurt Perleberg asks why we haven’t seen any US players for Real Madrid.
Because they’re not that good, maybe?
Google’s AI tells me the record for most La Liga appearances by a US player is 94 by Yunus Musah, all at Valencia. Then Luca de la Torre with 59 at Celta Vigo. After that, Kasey Keller (Rayo Vallecano) and Sergiño Dest (Barcelona) are tied with 51.
But seriously – it’s all about the right fit. And even then, the team and their supporters might not appreciate you. Looking your way, Chelsea.
We have not been presented any postgame comments yet. Lots of beer promotion.
Full time: Real Madrid 1-0 Juventus
If you were expecting Real to dominate this encounter, you were right. Only a series of stellar saves by Di Gregorio kept this close. Juve had some bright moments early on but nothing that screamed, “yes, this team deserves an equalizer” for the last 60-75 minutes.
Next up: the winner of Borussia Dortmund vs. Monterrey, which will take place in the nice air conditioning of Atlanta this evening. I’m picking Monterrey. Concacaf are overdue.
90 min +5: Last chance for Juve, and is that a call for a penalty? No, our referee says with emphatic waves of his arms. Replay shows Kolo Muani was basically headed for the ground the whole time, hoping for a miracle.
The ball is recycled out and hit from a long way away out of desperation. Courtois collects, and …
80 seconds left … throw-in for Real. Juve players showing some long faces.
Justin Kavanagh writes: “Infantino will be happy that Mbappe is back now that Messi is out of the tournament. If Juve could sneak an equalizer, though, you’d fancy Di Gregorio to provide the heroics in a shootout.”
I would predict Real would win a shootout 1-0.
90 min +3: Offside on Juve.
90 min +1: Real play keepaway for a while, then blast the ball downfield for no apparent reason.
The crowd, having finished saluting Valverde, are silent. Expectations for the remaining 210 seconds are low.
We’ll have five minutes of stoppage time, starting … oh, 30 seconds ago.
90 min: Ceballos replaces Valverde, who receives a well-earned ovation as he departs. He wipes his sweaty face, then claps to acknowledge the crowd.
89 min: Valverde springs forward and loses control of the ball but manages to knock it off a defender to earn a corner kick. That’ll keep Juve pinned back a bit more as time starts to run out.
Quick word from krishnamoorthy v: “If you have done refereeing for U 14, you are qualified for Manchester derby.”
I still have a lot to live for, so no thanks.
87 min: YELLOW to Jude Bellingham. That’s our first card of the day, and there have been no incidents to this point at which it was even a question. Fair play indeed.
Referee Szymon Marciniak shows the yellow card to Jude Bellingham. Photograph: Lynne Sladky/AP
85 min: At last, it’s Juve’s last window, and we’ll see Weston McKennie along with Federico Gatti. The sad figures of Locatelli and Rugani stroll out past their own goal for the long walk around the field to their bench.
83 min: Bellingham combines with Vinicius Junior, and the ball is sprayed wide to Tchouaméni, who shoots back across the grain, and forces a 10th save, this one a fingertip save at full extension, from Di Gregorio. He’s entering Tim Howard territory here.
80 min: It would appear that Igor Tudor changed his mind about using his third substitution window right now, and Juve are indeed on the attack. Real regain control, but that was a helpful reminder that this game is still just 1-0, thanks in large part to Di Gregorio’s nine saves.
Game reset at the cooling break …
Real lead 1-0 on a powerful short-range header by Garcia.
Mbappe is in for Real, and Modric is about to join him, even though they really need people at the back to keep things calm for another 15-20 minutes.
Speaking of calm, the Weather Channel now says “expect dry conditions for the next 6 hours,” and the precipitation on the radar is all north of Miami.
Modric takes the captain’s armband as he replaces Güler.
We haven’t seen confirmation that McKennie is actually on.
76 min: So we WILL see Weston McKennie in this game!
After the cooling break …
72 min: CHANCE for Real, and how did THAT stay out?!
Precise passing in the penalty area, including a couple of touches for Mbappe, and it goes back to the top of the area for Güler, who launches a brutal shot toward the lower corner that Di Gregorio somehow keeps out. Fine game by the Italian keeper.
70 min: CHANCE for Juve. Not over yet!
But they’re taking out Yildiz, so maybe it is. Off the bench, it’s US cornerstone Weston McKenn- … oh, no, it’s Teun Koopmeiners.
69 min: Valverde seems determined to get on the scoresheet, no matter how many times he has to shoot. Di Gregorio scoops this one off the ground.
67 min: To underscore the point, Real shoot twice in three seconds, each time bouncing back off a wall of defenders.
Mbappe officially makes his way in, which means we see plenty of picture of people wearing his shirt. He replaces Garcia, scorer of the lone goal so far.
Here comes Mbappe …
Into a game in which, honestly, Real probably don’t need him. Juve haven’t looked like equalizing in a while.
On comes Kylian Mbappe. Photograph: Allstar Picture Library Ltd/Richard Sellers/Apl/Sportsphoto
66 min: Patient possession for Real, and why not?
63 min: Nicolas Gonzalez is the man replacing Kelly.
The Weather Channel is still saying “thunderstorms will end at 5:30” while we have no thunderstorms and no lightning on the radar.
The game continues.
60 min: BICYCLE KICK by Valverde, and it’s only the alertness of the in-form Juve keeper Di Gregorio that keeps us from being at 2-0.
59 min: Conceição departs, replaced by Filip Kostic. Also, English defender Lloyd Kelly, signed permanently by Juve after a successful loan spell, is out.
56 min: Conceição bids for an immediate answer with a worm-burning shot that Courtois has to dive to slap away.
We have now reached the part of the game in which players sit down with cramps.
GOOOOOALLLL! Real Madrid 1-0 Juventus (Garcia 54)
That was coming, like a storm front passing across the peninsula.
And this time, Alexander-Arnold takes a touch, looks up and puts in a high cross that drops where Garcia has enough space for an uncontested 6-yard header that he knocks straight under the bar and into the net.
Gonzalo Garcia scores for Madrid! Photograph: Marta Lavandier/AP
51 min: Corner for Juve, as we’re again starting brightly. Real defend well and break quickly with Vinicius Junior down the left, stopped by Locatelli deep in his own half.
Garcia then draws a foul from Conceição. Nothing interesting from the free kick, but the ball is worked back out to Bellingham, who blasts a shot from 20 yards that stings Di Gregorio’s hands.
And another chance for Real as Di Gregorio sprawls to stop a dipping shot with some menace.
50 min: Trent Alexander-Arnold runs on to the ball in an acre of space near the corner of the penalty area. He has all day to settle it, and he picks out a spot …
No, I’m kidding – he blasted it several dozen rows into the stands.
Row-Z botherer Trent Alexander-Arnold. Photograph: Richard Sellers/Getty Images/Allstar
49 min: A cross gets through for Juve, but the ball goes beyond the attacker. Also, the flag was up. And there are probably other reasons it wouldn’t have been a goal.
For the record – there were no halftime subs.
48 min: Courtois and a defender can’t agree on who should be clearing the ball, and the resulting awkward clearance eventually yields a Juve corner.
47 min: Valverde tries curling a shot within the penalty area, and he doesn’t miss by that much.
No sign of weather issues yet.
Second half is underway. Still 0-0.
Ian Copestake writes: “Are you the first MBMing referee in the Guardian’s history? And does your full name suggest a penchant for French symbolist poetry? So many questions and so few minutes.”
All that I know about French is that my name roughly translates to “pretty hard.” As far as referees go … maybe? To be fair, I’ve never done any level higher than Under-16 low-level travel, Under-14 higher-level travel and Under-19 rec league. I’m too old to keep up with anyone else.
The ever-knowledgeable Peter Oh checks in: “It’s interesting that RM fans are watching in Athens, GA, but frankly I would be more impressed if REM fans were watching in Athens, GA. Or maybe even the band themselves. Anyway, this tournament makes me wonder if I’m Losing My Religion.”
One of my bands played an R.E.M. tribute recently, but we didn’t do that one, due in part to the lack of a mandolin player.
When drummer Bill Berry left one of the two Big Bands from Athens (the other being the B-52s), the headline font in the local newspaper was about the same size as the end of World War II.
Weather watch
Justin Kavanagh writes: “The Forecast called for pain at the start, but the weather now Feels Like Rain in Miami, so I think you need some of the great John Hiatt at halftime. “
Unfortunately, yes, it appears that some of the green blobs on the radar in and around Florida are now passing over Miami. The Weather Channel says “thunderstorms likely to continue through 6 p.m. (two hours and change from now),” but there’s no lightning on the map. Maybe we’ll just have a good soaking rain.
Halftime: Real Madrid 0-0 Juventus
After a promising start at both ends, Real have had the better of things since the cooling break, but honestly, neither of these teams can finish as well as Al-Hilal.
Just saying.
45 min +3: Bellingham, Valverde and Alexander-Arnold form a potent passing triangle and work their way forward, where Trent unleashes a powerful cross that could easily have caromed into the net off any of the players from either side lined up across the 6-yard box.
45 min: Impressive turn from Güler, but his cross is blocked away.
Real reset, and it’s a CHANCE for Real as Valverde laces a shot from 18 yards that Di Gregorio impressively knocks wide with a mighty sideways leap. That might have been goal-bound.
Four minutes of stoppage time, still 0-0.
43 min: Thuram has it on the left for Juve, but his cross finds no one in Juve’s dark shirts.
41 min: Quickly taken free kick at midfield for Juve. They continue even after one of their players rolls around on the grass for a bit. Real win the ball back thanks to, of all people, Vinicius Junior, tracking back to help out at the back.
39 min: Juve now seem to have seen enough of Real’s patient and nearly effective attack. They swarm to win the ball back.
Stephanie McMahon is a name closely associated to WWE. She is an American businessman and is the daughter of former WWE Chairman and CEO Vince McMahon and Linda McMahon. Stephanie also happens to be the wife of WWE Chief Content Officer Paul ‘Triple H’ Levesque. From championship gold to executive goals, the duo has been instrumental in shaping the modern WWE landscape. They are WWE’s ultimate power couple, a real-life tag team ruling from both the ring and the C-suite.Stephanie has also been a part of the wrestling industry and has proven herself as one of the finest players of WWE. She started off in the industry as a model at the age of 13, and then made her debut inside the ring in 1998 when she was only 21 years old. After 20 years as a pro wrestler, she bade adieu to the ring. Following her exit, McMahon became a WWE board member in 2013, holding various positions in the company. Over the years, the former WWE legend has amassed a humongous wealth from the company and her multiple ventures. Let’s take a look at her net worth in 2025, source of income, WWE relations, and more.
Net worth of Stephanie McMahon in 2025
According to Celebrity Net Worth, Stephanie McMahon’s 2025 net worth is estimated at $250 million, all thanks to her WWE stakes, executive roles, and strategic business ventures. Reports suggest that most of their wealth comes from Stephanie’s significant investments in WWE’s common stock. When WME bought WWE, Stephanie had about 2.5 million shares of WWE’s common stock. The value of those shares fluctuated between $40 million and $225 million. WWE was sold for $106 a share, which meant her shares were valued at $265 million.
The current source of income of Stephanie McMahon
Stephanie McMahon’s primary source of income in 2025 is her role as a board member of WWE and her ongoing involvement in various business ventures. The current salary is expected to be around $2.5 million. Besides, being the board member of WWE, the former WWE star also hosts a talk show named ‘Stephanie’s Places’ on ESPN+, where she interviews professional wrestlers about their journeys into WWE.
Personal life
Stephanie has been married to WWE superstar and executive Paul “Triple H” Levesque. The couple started dating in 2000, when they were involved in a scripted storyline together. After dating each other for 3 years, they got engaged on Valentine’s Day in 2003 and tied the knot that October in Sleepy Hollow, New York. After their wedding, Stephanie adopted her husband’s last name and changed her middle name to McMahon. The couple has three daughters: Aurora Rose Levesque, Murphy Claire Levesque, and Vaughn Evelyn Levesque.
Stephanie McMahon rings in the Paul “Triple H” Levesque era: WrestleMania XL Sunday highlights
Business ventures
Stephanie has made quite a name for herself in the wrestling world, having held the title of Women’s Champion and even stepping in as the SmackDown General Manager. Over the years, McMahon has worn many hats, starting as an Account Executive and Receptionist from 1998 to 2002, to becoming the Director of Creative Television from 2002 to 2006.She later went on to become the Senior Vice-President of Creative Writing from 2006 to 2007, followed by her role as Executive Vice-President of Creative Development and Operations from 2007 to 2013. Later, she took on the title of Chief Brand Officer in 2013.In May 2022, she announced she would be taking a leave of absence from her responsibilities. However, when Vince retired in July, Stephanie was named the new chairwoman, alongside Nick Khan. Also Read: Drew McIntyre graces former WWE star Jinder Mahal’s wedding ceremony in traditional Indian attireIn January 2023, she made headlines again by resigning from WWE after her father’s return as chairman. Throughout her career, McMahon has earned two Slammy Awards and the prestigious Vincent J. McMahon Legacy of Excellence Award.
In the mood to party like it is the 1970s? | Dazed and Confused
Return to the ‘70s with Richard Linklater’s American classic Dazed and Confused. On the last day of classes, the students of Lee High School—played by an extraordinary cast that includes Milla Jovovich, Adam Goldberg, Parker Posey, Renée Zellweger, Cole Hauser, Ben Affleck, and Matthew McConaughey—throw a blow-out party to say good-bye to the year that was. From embarrassing initiation rites to thoughtful meditations on the meaning of life, the film depicts the joys and sorrows of high school in hilarious detail. Entertainment Weekly wrote, “Once every decade or so, a movie captures the hormone-drenched, fashion-crazed, pop-song-driven rituals of American youth culture with such loving authenticity that it comes to seem a kind of anthem, as innocently giddy and spirited as the teenagers it’s about.”