Blog

  • Michigan lost billions in climate-related investments in Trump’s first year

    Michigan lost billions in climate-related investments in Trump’s first year

    • President Donald Trump’s first year in office has ushered in big changes for clean energy in Michigan
    • The state has seen $540 million in canceled climate grants and a dramatic decrease in green energy-related investments
    • Analysts expect the trend to continue as shifting federal policies prompt a renewed embrace of gas-powered vehicles and fossil fuel energy generation

    What a difference a year (and a political leadership change) makes. 

    At this time in 2024, Michigan was expecting a windfall of federal funds to fuel a transition to clean energy, along with billions of dollars’ worth of green manufacturing projects subsidized by the Biden administration’s signature climate spending bills. 

    But since President Donald Trump began his second term in January and began scrapping federal climate programs he refers to collectively as “the green new scam,” Michigan has seen a wave of project and grant cancellations, along with renewed investment in fossil fuel-based manufacturing and power generation.

    Roughly $540 million in climate-related grants to Michigan have been canceled or held up since Inauguration Day, according to a national database compiled by Atlas Public Policy, while shifting market forces and the end of federal tax credits for electric vehicles have caused clean manufacturing investments in Michigan to whipsaw from billions annually in recent years to $3 billion in canceled investments this year.

    RELATED: 

    “It certainly mirrors what we’re seeing nationally,” said Annabelle Rosser, a research analyst with the national firm. 

    Instead, Michigan automakers are scaling back and refocusing on gas and hybrid vehicle production — a trend emblemized by Ford’s and General Motors’ recent decisions to scrap EV production plans at Michigan plants and retool to produce gas-powered vehicles.

    “That’s just the way the market is shaking out right now,” said Glenn Stevens, executive director of MichAuto, an affiliate of the Detroit Regional Chamber. 

    It’s a trend likely to continue into 2026, as Trump administration officials continue their efforts to downplay climate change, deemphasize renewable energy and embrace fossil fuels.

    Here’s where things stand in Michigan as the year draws to a close:

    $540 million in canceled funding

    Michigan has seen $540 million in cancelled funding, with the biggest chunk coming from the Solar for All Program, a $7 billion US Environmental Protection Agency fund meant to expand solar energy in disadvantaged communities.

    Michigan had been slated to receive a $156 million grant through that fund, while Native American tribes in the state were expecting part of a $62 million grant shared with other Great Lakes tribes. 
    Michigan Attorney General Dana Nessel has sued over the grant cancellations, joining 22 other states to argue the administration “unilaterally and illegally terminated” the program, overstepping checks and balances to cancel congressionally approved funding. 

    Beyond the solar program, the federal government has cancelled or proposed to cancel more than 20 Michigan grants ranging from $31.7 million to help LuxWall Inc. build an energy-efficient window glass factory in Detroit to $14,000 for a west Michigan climate resilience project.

    Other canceled grants include: 

    • $28.2 million for TS Conductor to build a high-capacity power line plant in Erie
    • $20.4 million for Ecoworks, a Detroit nonprofit that planned to convert houses of worship into climate resilience hubs 
    • $20 million for the Inter-Tribal Council of Michigan to improve energy efficiency in tribal homes
    • $20 million for the Southwestern Michigan Planning Commission to build two resilience hubs in Benton Harbor, upgrade energy efficiency in low-income housing and support a workforce development initiative

    Smaller grants would have funded energy efficient housing in Kalamazoo, a climate change and resilience plan for the city of Flint and wild rice bed restoration in Michigan waterways.

    The Trump administration has also frozen a $20 billion federal “green bank” network that had been expected to send hundreds of millions of dollars to Michigan to build and rehab housing across the state, insulate old homes and boost energy efficiency in factories. 

    Trump officials have signaled that more cancellations could be coming as they review tens of billions of dollars in clean energy funds awarded by the previous administration. 

    Michigan utilities, for example, are awaiting word on the status of $15 billion in clean energy-related loans announced days before Trump took office. And the Trump administration is reevaluating a grant program that awarded $500 million to retool a Lansing GM factory for electrified vehicles.

    An exception to the administration’s shift of resources away from Biden-era energy policies: It has continued making disbursements from a $1.5 billion loan authorized in 2024 to support the reopening of the Palisades nuclear power plant and in December announced another $400 million to develop two new reactors at the site.

    “President Trump has made clear that America is going to build more energy, not less, and nuclear is central to that mission,” US Secretary of Energy Chris Wright said in a statement accompanying the grant announcement.

    $3 billion in canceled projects

    Spurred along by federal and state subsidies and regulations that encouraged automakers to build EVs and consumers to buy them, Michigan manufacturers announced a collective $23.8 billion in new investments tied to the energy transition between 2022 and 2024, mostly related to battery or EV plants.

    Atlas Public Policy’s green economy tracker shows changes in green manufacturing investments in Michigan in recent years. (Courtesy of Atlas Public Policy)

    Fast-forward to 2025, and the trendline has reversed. Michigan saw $3 billion worth of disinvestment this year as companies scrapped planned EV factories or closed existing ones, according to the Atlas analysis. 

    Spokespeople for the US Department of Energy, which has overseen efforts to reprioritize fossil fuels by shifting federal resources and loosening vehicle emissions regulations, did not respond to requests for comment from Bridge Michigan. 

    But Trump has routinely cast EVs as a costly “scam” while downplaying the effects of climate change caused by burning fossil fuels like gasoline. During a December announcement that his administration would loosen fuel economy standards applying to new vehicles, Trump cast his pro-gas policies as a win for consumers that would “protect American jobs” and shave “at least $1,000 off the price of a new car.”

    The biggest EV-related cancellation is the Gotion project, a once-planned $2.4 billion electric vehicle battery plant near Big Rapids that spent years embroiled in controversy before state officials declared the project dead this fall. 

    In that case, Rosser, the Atlas analyst, said, shifting federal policies weren’t the only factor.

    “The rollback of the (Inflation Reduction Act) clean energy tax credits, softening demand for electric vehicles, and concerns about the company’s foreign ownership are all likely factors,” Rosser said.

    This fall, batterymaker XALT Energy announced plans to close its Midland headquarters and an Auburn Hills facility just two years after announcing plans to spend a “double digit million sum” expanding the facility.

    Automotive supplier Dana Inc., which had vowed to invest $54.2 million at an Auburn Hills EV battery plant by the end of 2024, instead announced this fall that it would close the plant amid an “unexpected and immediate reduction in customer orders driven by lower demand for electric vehicles.”

    Fortescue canceled an under-construction $210 million EV charger, battery and hydrogen generator plant at the former Fisher Body site in Detroit, citing shifting US markets and policies including the loss of “critical tax credits.”

    Other losses included the closure of an Akasol electric vehicle battery factory in Warren and cancelled plans to build a TS Conductor high-voltage direct current conductor plant in Erie using a since-cancelled $28 million federal grant. 

    TS Conductor is still building the plant, but switched locations to South Carolina after receiving what company CEO Jason Huang described as a “very generous incentive package.” 

    Timelines and ambitions for numerous other EV and battery factory projects in Michigan have shifted amid the changing policies and market forces. GM, for instance, sold its stake in a planned EV battery factory near Lansing to LG Energy Solution and the plant’s planned opening has been delayed from 2025 to 2026. And Ford has scaled back plans for an EV battery plant near Marshall, now slated to open in 2026.

    Stevens said he expects the EV market to grow in 2026, but “it’s not going to be at the acceleration curve that a lot of people projected, and certainly the previous administration was pushing.”

    Creative Commons License


    Continue Reading

  • Roman around the Christmas tree photo of the day for Dec. 25, 2025

    Roman around the Christmas tree photo of the day for Dec. 25, 2025

    In a scene that feels more like a midnight vigil than a routine inspection, NASA engineers and scientists gathered in near darkness inside a pristine cleanroom. Armed with flashlights and ultraviolet lamps, members of the Nancy Grace Roman…

    Continue Reading

  • How Hallmark movies have helped develop ‘unmatched’ talent in B.C.’s film industry

    How Hallmark movies have helped develop ‘unmatched’ talent in B.C.’s film industry

    Listen to this article

    Estimated 4 minutes

    The audio version of this article is generated by AI-based technology. Mispronunciations can occur. We are working with our partners to continually review and improve the results.

    Hallmark movies are kind…

    Continue Reading

  • Inside the leather trade war hitting handbags, boots and couches

    Inside the leather trade war hitting handbags, boots and couches

    Different types of leather are seen at the Rio of Mercedes cowboy boot factory, on July 31, 2025, in Mercedes, Texas.

    Ronaldo Schemidt | AFP | Getty Images

    Bootmaker Twisted X — known for its Western footwear — was thrown into chaos overnight when President Donald Trump imposed sweeping tariffs on imports in April.

    The company turned a conference room at its Decatur, Texas, headquarters into a “tariff war room” as import costs on its finished work boots surged, shipments were paused mid-transit and invoices fluctuated so wildly that staff found themselves recalculating margins by the hour.

    “A lot of other leather companies had to pause shipments because of the chaos and it felt like prices were going all over the place before you could take account,” Twisted X CEO Prasad Reddy told CNBC. “It was a very uncertain time.”

    Twisted X wasn’t alone. Leather retailers big and small are facing similar challenges, and the result has been higher prices at the register that are unlikely to come down anytime soon.

    Pre-tariff inventory is gone, while replacement orders cost far more. The products hitting shelves now were manufactured with more expensive hides, subjected to pricier foreign processing and shipped with higher freight costs than last year’s merchandise, industry experts said.

    The Yale Budget Lab projects that leather goods prices will remain elevated by nearly 22% for at least the next one to two years, driven by inflation, supply chain bottlenecks and heavy tariff exposure, particularly across China, Vietnam, Italy and India.

    “The reason why leather is hit so hard is twofold,” said John Ricco with the budget lab. “No. 1, some of these tariff rates that are the highest are placed on different countries where we import most leather. The second reason is that we just import a lot of leather, and, more broadly, apparel-related products from these trading partners than we make.”

    The costs have already shown up for brands like Tapestry, owner of handbag makers Coach and Kate Spade. Executives told investors in August that tariff-related expenses could total $160 million, warning of “greater than previously expected profit headwinds” moving forward.

    Chasing low costs

    A pair of Twisted X boots starts the way most U.S. leather goods do: as a raw, salted cow hide from an American ranch. That hide is shipped overseas, usually to Asia, to be tanned into leather. For Twisted X, roughly half of its products are tanned in China, down from 90% in 2017, Reddy said.

    Once turned into leather, the material typically is shipped to another factory — often in China, Vietnam, Mexico or India — to be cut, stitched and assembled, before finally returning to the U.S. as a finished product.

    Under normal conditions, that global supply chain kept costs low. But reliance on foreign production backfired when the new duties took effect, Reddy said.

    “When tariffs happened, everything stopped,” said Kerry Brozyna, president of the Leather and Hide Council of America. “So they [China] couldn’t take shipments in because if they took them in and they computed in the price of the tariff, they wouldn’t be able to sell them.”

    Currently, the U.S. leather trade deficit is one of the widest in manufacturing. In 2023, the U.S. imported $1.37 billion in leather apparel while exporting just $92.7 million, a roughly 15-to-1 deficit, according to the Census Bureau. China alone supplies about one-third of all leather goods imported into the U.S.

    “Being so reliant on many overseas productions methods ended up hurting many people in the industry in the beginning when they didn’t know exactly what was going to happen,” Reddy said. “At Twisted X, we have been working for a while to reduce reliance on China.”

    As the duties took effect, Twisted X and many other leather companies rushed to exit China and encountered new problems: bottlenecks in Cambodia and Bangladesh, longer lead times in Vietnam, and a sudden 50% tariff on many Indian leather exports imposed in August.

    By late summer, nearly every leather company was paying more at every stage — for hides, tanning, assembly and re-importation, according to Reddy.

    “We saw all our channels to make boots keep getting more expensive until we were able to figure out a good solution,” Reddy said.

    Conglomerates like Steve Madden are also feeling the impacts.

    “The third quarter was challenging, driven largely by the impact of new tariffs on goods imported into the United States,” Edward Rosenfeld, chairman and CEO of Steve Madden, said on an earnings call in November.

    Price increases

    Many companies absorbed what they could, but that buffer is fading, Ricco said. Despite rerouting supply chains and moving production, Twisted X said it still had to raise prices around 1% to 3% this year.

    “We look at it as a success,” Twisted X’s chief marketing officer, Tricia Mahoney, told CNBC. “Many competitors were looking at bigger increases and but we made sure to prioritize our customers and keep the prices as stable as possible. Next year could be tough but we are more prepared than ever.”

    Already, leather luxury prices are up. Chanel’s iconic Classic Flap bag is about 5% more expensive than it was last year, after yet another round of price hikes this spring, according to luxury retail pricing data.

    But, by 2026, the leather industry’s price shock will likely be more prominent, Ricco said. Analysts expect prices for leather footwear and accessories to rise roughly 22% over the next year or two and around 7% long term as higher tariffs, freight costs and scarce premium hides move through the system.

    “2026 is going to probably be where rubber meets the road,” Ricco said. “They [leather companies] have to make these decisions about whether to pass cost increases on to consumers, whether to cut jobs and whether to reduce payments to shareholders.”

    Domestic declines

    Workers at the Rio of Mercedes cowboy boot factory put the finishing touches on boots on July 31, 2025, in Mercedes, Texas.

    Ronaldo Schemidt | AFP | Getty Images

    The decline of a once-booming domestic leather manufacturing industry is also reducing the options companies have to pivot away from the global supply chain.

    In the 1950s, manufacturers employed more than 300,000 people in roughly 1,000 tanneries nationwide, mainly spread across the Midwest and Northeast, according to the Leather and Hide Council of America.

    The workforce has fallen to around 50,000 in 2025, with the number of tanneries dwindling to a few hundred, per the council.

    Reddy said the so-called golden age of domestic manufacturing is long gone.

    The burden of tariffs has had the steepest impact on brands that rely on finished goods from Asia — not companies sourcing leather domestically. So far, rather than restoring U.S. manufacturing, as the Trump administration had predicated the tariffs on, many brands have responded by reshuffling suppliers overseas to contain costs, according to industry experts.

    Women work in a leather factory in Kolkata, India, on November 25, 2025.

    Nurphoto | Nurphoto | Getty Images

    Cattle shortages

    U.S. leather companies are also dealing with a raw material shortage, as there are simply fewer cattle hides to work with.

    The U.S. cattle herd is at its smallest point since the 1950s following prolonged drought, rising feed costs and herd liquidation. Since hides are a mandatory byproduct of dairy and beef production, fewer cattle mean fewer hides — even as global demand for top-grade leather persists for handbags, upholstery and footwear.

    “Few cattle means that what hides are left makes it more expensive to produce boots with high-quality leather that we use,” Reddy said.

    For shoppers hoping for a discount by trading down for a synthetic, alternatives haven’t been spared either.

    Many faux-leather and polyurethane materials rely on petrochemical inputs sourced from Asia, which also fall under the new tariff schedules. Retailers and industry analysts said synthetic footwear and handbags are seeing mid- to high-single-digit cost increases, according to industry estimates.

    Continue Reading

  • The Best Dive Watches of 2025

    The Best Dive Watches of 2025

    Year after year, the popularity of the dive watch category shows no signs of decreasing. A classic for most brands and a must-have in any serious collection, owning a dive watch is always a great option for summer or…

    Continue Reading

  • Blood test could predict who is most at risk from common inherited heart condition | Health

    Blood test could predict who is most at risk from common inherited heart condition | Health

    Scientists are developing a simple blood test to predict who is most at risk from the world’s most common inherited heart condition.

    Millions of people worldwide have hypertrophic cardiomyopathy (HCM), a disease of the heart muscle where the…

    Continue Reading

  • Xiaomi 17 Ultra launched with Leica 200MP zoom camera, 1-inch main lens, Snapdragon 8 Elite Gen 5, 6800mAh battery and more – Huawei Central

    1. Xiaomi 17 Ultra launched with Leica 200MP zoom camera, 1-inch main lens, Snapdragon 8 Elite Gen 5, 6800mAh battery and more  Huawei Central
    2. Xiaomi 17 Ultra launch date and design officially revealed – GSMArena.com news  GSMArena.com
    3. Xiaomi 17 Ultra…

    Continue Reading

  • Pope Leo XIV Christmas address

    Pope Leo XIV Christmas address

    Pope Leo XIV gestures on the day of delivering the traditional Christmas Day Urbi et Orbi speech to the city and the world from the main balcony of St. Peter’s Basilica at the Vatican, on Dec. 25, 2025.

    Simone Risoluti | Via Reuters

    Pope Leo XIV,…

    Continue Reading

  • NCCIA busts ‘international cartel’ involved in $60m cyber fraud, arrests 15 foreigners from Karachi – Dawn

    1. NCCIA busts ‘international cartel’ involved in $60m cyber fraud, arrests 15 foreigners from Karachi  Dawn
    2. 34 arrested, including 15 foreigners, in Karachi cyber fraud crackdown  The Express Tribune
    3. NCCIA arrests 34 in online scam involving…

    Continue Reading

  • BNP leader Tarique Rahman returns: Who is Bangladesh’s potential next PM? | Politics News

    BNP leader Tarique Rahman returns: Who is Bangladesh’s potential next PM? | Politics News

    After 17 years in exile, Tarique Rahman, leader of the Bangladesh Nationalist Party (BNP) and frontrunner to be the South Asian nation’s next prime minister, returned to Dhaka on Thursday to a rousing welcome by thousands of his party’s…

    Continue Reading